Longitudinal clinical and functional outcome in distinct cognitive subgroups of first-episode psychosis: a cluster analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits may be characteristic for only a subgroup of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and the link with clinical and functional outcomes is less profound than previously thought. This study aimed to identify cognitive subgroups in a large sample of FEP using a clustering approach with healthy controls as a reference group, subsequently linking cognitive subgroups to clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: 204 FEP patients were included. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using baseline brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia (BACS). Cognitive subgroups were compared to 40 controls and linked to longitudinal clinical and functional outcomes (PANSS, GAF, self-reported WHODAS 2.0) up to 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Three distinct cognitive clusters emerged: relative to controls, we found one cluster with preserved cognition (n = 76), one moderately impaired cluster (n = 74) and one severely impaired cluster (n = 54). Patients with severely impaired cognition had more severe clinical symptoms at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up as compared to patients with preserved cognition. General functioning (GAF) in the severely impaired cluster was significantly lower than in those with preserved cognition at baseline and showed trend-level effects at 6- and 12-month follow-up. No significant differences in self-reported functional outcome (WHODAS 2.0) were present. CONCLUSIONS: Current results demonstrate the existence of three distinct cognitive subgroups, corresponding with clinical outcome at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up. Importantly, the cognitively preserved subgroup was larger than the severely impaired group. Early identification of discrete cognitive profiles can offer valuable information about the clinical outcome but may not be relevant in predicting self-reported functional outcomes.

Antipsychotic medication for women with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

There are significant differences between men and women in the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic drugs. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of what is currently known about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antipsychotics in women with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and translate these insights into considerations for clinical practice. Slower drug absorption, metabolism and excretion in women all lead to higher plasma levels, which increase the risk for side-effects. Moreover, women reach higher dopamine receptor occupancy compared to men at similar serum levels, since oestrogens increase dopamine sensitivity. As current treatment guidelines are based on studies predominantly conducted in men, women are likely to be overmedicated by default. The risk of overmedicating generally increases when sex hormone levels are high (e.g. during ovulation and gestation), whereas higher doses may be required during low-hormonal phases (e.g. during menstruation and menopause). For premenopausal women, with the exceptions of quetiapine and lurasidone, doses of antipsychotics should be lower with largest adjustments required for olanzapine. Clinicians should be wary of side-effects that are particularly harmful in women, such as hyperprolactinaemia which can cause oestrogen deficiency and metabolic symptoms that may cause cardiovascular diseases. Given the protective effects of oestrogens on the course of SSD, oestrogen replacement therapy should be considered for postmenopausal patients, who are more vulnerable to side-effects and yet require higher dosages of most antipsychotics to reach similar efficacy. In conclusion, there is a need for tailored, female-specific prescription guidelines, which take into account adjustments required across different phases of life.

Psychiatrists effect on positive symptom severity and daily functioning during pharmacotherapy for first-episode psychosis patients.

Clinical outcomes after a first-episode of psychosis (FEP) are heterogeneous. Many patient-related factors such as gender and comorbidity have been studied to predict symptomatic outcomes. However, psychiatrist-related factors such as prescription behaviour and gender have received little attention. We assessed the relationship between patients' psychiatrists, psychosis severity and daily functioning in 201 patients remitted from an FEP for a duration of one year, treated by 18 different psychiatrists. We controlled for baseline severity, dose and type of antipsychotic medication, frequency of visits, and patients' education. Symptom severity, daily functioning, and antipsychotic drug use were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and, 12 months follow-up. We found that psychiatrists accounted for 9.1% of the explained variance in patients' symptom severity and 10.1% of the explained variance in daily functioning.These effects persisted even when controlling for factors such as baseline severity and the prescribed dose. The effect of prescribed dose on symptom severity and daily functioning differed between psychiatrists. Treatment centre, session frequency, and medication nonadherence were not related to symptom severity. Our results emphasize the importance of individual psychiatrist factors in symptomatic outcomes after an FEP. Further identification of psychiatrist-related factors such as the quality of therapeutic alliances and shared decision-making, may optimize psychiatrists' training with the goal of improving patient outcomes.

Antipsychotic dopamine D2 affinity and negative symptoms in remitted first episode psychosis patients.

Negative symptoms can be an integral part of schizophrenia spectrum pathology and can be secondary to other psychotic symptoms or caused by antipsychotic medication. As antipsychotic drugs differ in their affinity to dopamine receptors and some antipsychotics have partial agonistic effects, antipsychotic drugs are expected to vary in their ability to cause negative symptoms. The association between negative symptoms and antipsychotic medication divided into partial agonists, or antagonists with high or low D2 affinity was assessed in 310 remitted first episode psychosis (FEP) patients. Severity of negative symptoms was assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Linear regression analyses were performed while controlling for differences in clinical and sociodemographic characteristics between the groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Patients using partial agonists (n = 78) showed fewer negative symptoms compared to those using high affinity antagonists (n = 84). Patients using partial agonists displayed less severe negative symptoms compared to those using low affinity antagonists (n = 148) at a trend level (p = 0.051). Negative symptom severity was higher in patients who had higher antipsychotic doses. In remitted FEP patients, we observed that the use of antipsychotic medication classified as partial agonists was associated with lower severity of negative symptoms, while the use of antagonists with high D2 affinity was associated with more severe negative symptoms.

[Antipsychotic medication after a first episode of psychosis: taper or continue?] / Antipsychotica na een eerste psychose.

In this paper we discuss the risks and benefits of discontinuing antipsychotic medication within one year after remission of a first episode of psychosis. We start with a fictional case report of a 21-year-old man, who was diagnosed with schizophreniform disorder four months earlier. While symptoms responded well to a daily dose of 10 mg ariprazole, he experienced side effects (tiredness and mild hypersomnia). Three months after symptom remission, he expressed the wish to discontinue his medication. How should psychiatrists respond to his wish? To answer that, we briefly summarize relevant evidence and discuss arguments for the different therapeutic approaches, i.e., maintaining vs. tapering antipsychotic medication, based on specific patient characteristics. Recommendations from the current Dutch guidelines are complemented with personal experience and considerations in finding the optimal balance between side effects, relapse risk, stigma and acceptance of mental health problems, while incorporating the principles of shared decision-making.

Monoamine oxidase inhibition by selected dye compounds.

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is an important drug target as the MAO isoforms play key roles in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, as well as in neuropsychiatric diseases such as depression. Methylene blue is an inhibitor of MAO-A, while azure B, the major metabolite of methylene blue, and various other structural analogues retain the ability to inhibit MAO-A. Based on this, the present study evaluated 22 dyes, many of which are structurally related to methylene blue, as potential inhibitors of human MAO-A and MAO-B. The results highlighted three dye compounds as good potency competitive and reversible MAO inhibitors, and which exhibit higher MAO inhibition than methylene blue: acridine orange, oxazine 170 and Darrow red. Acridine orange was found to be a MAO-A specific inhibitor (IC50  = 0.017 µM), whereas oxazine 170 is a MAO-B specific inhibitor (IC50  = 0.0065 µM). Darrow red was found to be a non-specific MAO inhibitor (MAO-A, IC50  = 0.059 µM; MAO-B, IC50  = 0.065 µM). These compounds may be advanced for further testing and preclinical development, or be used as possible lead compounds for the future design of MAO inhibitors.