Opportunities and Challenges for Decentralized Clinical Trial Approaches: European Health Technology Assessment Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Decentralized clinical trial (DCT) approaches are clinical trials in which some or all trial activities take place closer to participants' proximities instead of a traditional investigative site. Data from DCTs may be used for clinical and economic evaluations by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies to support reimbursement decision making. This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges for DCT approaches from an HTA perspective by interviewing representatives from European HTA bodies. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 25 European HTA representatives between September 2022 and February 2023, and transcripts were analyzed after thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two main themes were identified from the data relating to (1) DCT approaches in HTA and (2) trial-level acceptance and relevance. Experience with assessing DCTs was limited and a variety of knowledge about DCTs was observed. The respondents recognized the opportunity of DCTs to reduce recall bias when participant-reported outcome data can be collected more frequently and conveniently from home. Concerns were expressed about the data quality when participants become responsible for data collection. Despite this challenge, the respondents recognized the potential of DCTs to increase the generalizability of results because data can be collected in a setting reflective of the everyday situation potentially from a more diverse participant group. CONCLUSIONS: DCTs could generate relevant results for HTA decision making when data are collected in a real-world setting from a diverse participant group. Increased awareness of the opportunities and challenges could help HTA assessors in their appraisal of DCT approaches.

Primary nonadherence to drugs prescribed by general practitioners: A Dutch database study.

AIM: Primary nonadherence (PNA) is defined as not filling the first prescription for a drug treatment. PNA can lead not only to poor patient outcomes but also to exposure misclassification in written prescription databases. This study aims to estimate PNA in primary care in the Netherlands and to investigate associated factors. METHODS: Patients from the Nivel Primary Care Database (Nivel-PCD) who received a new prescription (>1 year not prescribed) from a general practitioner in 2012 were linked to pharmacy dispensing information of consenting pharmacies based on sex, year of birth, four-digit postal code and at least 50% matching Anatomical Therapeutic Classification codes. PNA was defined as not having a prescription dispensed within 30 days from the prescribing date. PNA was assessed overall and per drug class. The associations between PNA and several patient- and prescription-related characteristics were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression models. RESULTS: After matching 86 361 of 396 251 subjects (21.8%) in the Nivel-PCD records to the pharmacy records, this study included 65 877 subjects who received 181 939 new drug prescriptions. Overall, PNA was 11.5%. PNA was lowest for thyroid hormones (5.5%) and highest for proton pump inhibitors (12.8%). Several factors were associated with PNA, such as having comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-1.56 for >3 active diagnoses, compared to no active diagnoses) or reimbursement status (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.65-2.92 for not reimbursed drugs compared to fully reimbursed drugs). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 11.5% of newly prescribed drugs were not dispensed. This can lead to overestimation of the actual drug exposure status when using written prescription databases.

Direct-to-participant investigational medicinal product supply in clinical trials in Europe: Exploring the experiences of sponsors, site staff and couriers.

AIMS: Insights into the current practice of direct-to-participant (DtP) supply of investigational medicinal product (IMP) in the context of clinical trials conducted in Europe are needed, as regulations are unharmonized. This study is set out to explore how DtP IMP supply has been employed in Europe and what the advantages and disadvantages and barriers and facilitators of its implementation are. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives from sponsor companies, courier services and site study staff involved in the IMP dispensing and delivery process in Europe. Interviews were conducted between May and November 2021, and data were analysed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen respondents participated in one of the 12 interviews. Respondents had experience with different models of DtP IMP supply including shipment from the investigative site, a central pharmacy (a depot under the control of a pharmacist) and a local pharmacy-aiming to reduce trial participation burden. The respondents indicated that investigative site-to-participant shipment is not affected by regulatory barriers, but could burden site staff. Shipment from central locations was considered most efficient, but possible regulatory barriers related to maintaining participants' privacy and investigator oversight were identified. The respondents indicated that the involvement of local pharmacies to dispense IMP can be considered when the IMP is authorized. CONCLUSIONS: Several DtP IMP supply models are implemented in clinical trials conducted in Europe. In this study, three main DtP IMP models were identified, which can be referenced when describing these approaches for regulatory approval.

Bias in observational studies on the effectiveness of in hospital use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19.

PURPOSE: During the first waves of the coronavirus pandemic, evidence on potential effective treatments was urgently needed. Results from observational studies on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were conflicting, potentially due to biases. We aimed to assess the quality of observational studies on HCQ and its relation to effect sizes. METHODS: PubMed was searched on 15 March 2021 for observational studies on the effectiveness of in-hospital use of HCQ in COVID-19 patients, published between 01/01/2020 and 01/03/2021 on. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Association between study quality and study characteristics (journal ranking, publication date, and time between submission and publication) and differences between effects sizes found in observational studies compared to those found in RCTs, were assessed using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 33 (55%) included observational studies were scored as critical risk of bias, eleven (33%) as serious risk and only four (12%) as moderate risk of bias. Biases were most often scored as critical in the domains related to selection of participants (n = 13, 39%) and bias due to confounding (n = 8, 24%). There were no significant associations found between the study quality and the characteristics nor between the study quality and the effect estimates. DISCUSSION: Overall, the quality of observational HCQ studies was heterogeneous. Synthesis of evidence of effectiveness of HCQ in COVID-19 should focus on RCTs and carefully consider the added value and quality of observational evidence.

A Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Primary PCI.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) benefit from genotype-guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded trial in which patients undergoing primary PCI with stent implantation were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a P2Y12 inhibitor on the basis of early CYP2C19 genetic testing (genotype-guided group) or standard treatment with either ticagrelor or prasugrel (standard-treatment group) for 12 months. In the genotype-guided group, carriers of CYP2C19*2 or CYP2C19*3 loss-of-function alleles received ticagrelor or prasugrel, and noncarriers received clopidogrel. The two primary outcomes were net adverse clinical events - defined as death from any cause, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding defined according to Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) criteria - at 12 months (primary combined outcome; tested for noninferiority, with a noninferiority margin of 2 percentage points for the absolute difference) and PLATO major or minor bleeding at 12 months (primary bleeding outcome). RESULTS: For the primary analysis, 2488 patients were included: 1242 in the genotype-guided group and 1246 in the standard-treatment group. The primary combined outcome occurred in 63 patients (5.1%) in the genotype-guided group and in 73 patients (5.9%) in the standard-treatment group (absolute difference, -0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.0 to 0.7; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The primary bleeding outcome occurred in 122 patients (9.8%) in the genotype-guided group and in 156 patients (12.5%) in the standard-treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.98; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing primary PCI, a CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy for selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy was noninferior to standard treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel at 12 months with respect to thrombotic events and resulted in a lower incidence of bleeding. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; POPular Genetics ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01761786; Netherlands Trial Register number, NL2872.).

Opioid use is associated with increased out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risk among 40 000-cases across two countries.

AIMS: Opioid use has substantially increased in the last decade and is associated with overdose mortality, but also with increased mortality from cardiovascular causes. This finding may partly reflect an association between opioids and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Therefore, we aimed to investigate OHCA-risk of opioids in the community. METHODS: We conducted 2 population-based case-control studies separately in the Netherlands (2009-2018) and Denmark (2001-2015). Cases were individuals who experienced OHCA of presumed cardiac cause. Each case was matched with up to 5 non-OHCA-controls according to age, sex and OHCA-date. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 5473 OHCA-cases matched with 21 866 non-OHCA-controls in the Netherlands, and 35 017 OHCA-cases matched with 175 085 non-OHCA-controls in Denmark. We found that use of opioids (the Netherlands: cases: 5.4%, controls: 1.8%; Denmark: cases: 11.9%, controls: 4.4%) was associated with increased OHCA-risk in both regions (the Netherlands: OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.8-2.5]; Denmark: OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.5-2.1]). The association was observed in both sexes, and in individuals with cardiovascular disease (the Netherlands: OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.5-2.1]; Denmark: OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.5-1.7]) or without (the Netherlands: OR 3.4 [95% CI: 2.4-4.8], Pinteraction  < .0001; Denmark: OR 2.3 [95% CI: 2.0-2.5], Pinteraction  < .0001). CONCLUSION: Use of opioids is associated with increased OHCA-risk in both sexes, independently of concomitant cardiovascular disease. These findings should be considered when evaluating the harms and benefits of treatment with opioids.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and differential risk of cardiac and non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs in 37 000 cases.

AIMS: Drugs that prolong the QT interval, either by design (cardiac QT-prolonging drugs: anti-arrhythmics) or as off-target effect (non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs), may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Risk mitigation measures were instituted, in particular, surrounding prescription of cardiac QT-prolonging drugs. We studied OHCA risk of both drug types in current clinical practice. METHODS: Using data from large population-based OHCA registries in the Netherlands and Denmark, we conducted two independent case-control studies. OHCA cases with presumed cardiac causes were matched on age/sex/index date with up to five non-OHCA controls. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of cardiac or non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs with OHCA risk using conditional logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 2503 OHCA cases and 10 543 non-OHCA controls in the Netherlands, and 35 017 OHCA cases and 175 085 non-OHCA controls in Denmark. Compared to no use of QT-prolonging drugs, use of non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs (Netherlands: cases: 3.0%, controls: 1.9%; Denmark: cases: 14.9%, controls: 7.5%) was associated with increased OHCA risk (Netherlands: OR 1.37 [95% CI: 1.03-1.81]; Denmark: OR 1.63 [95% CI: 1.57-1.70]). The association between cardiac QT-prolonging drugs (Netherlands: cases: 4.0%, controls: 2.5%; Denmark: cases: 2.1%, controls: 0.9%) and OHCA was weaker (Netherlands: OR 1.17 [95% CI: 0.92-1.50]; Denmark: OR 1.21 [95% CI: 1.09-1.33]), although users of cardiac QT-prolonging drugs had more medication use and comorbidities associated with OHCA risk than users of non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, cardiac QT-prolonging drugs confer lower OHCA risk than non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs, although users of the former have higher a priori risk. This is likely due to risk mitigation measures surrounding prescription of cardiac QT-prolonging drugs.

Multiple categories of non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs are associated with increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: real-world data from a population-based study.

AIM: Drugs causing QT-prolongation as off-target effect [non-cardiac QT-prolonging drugs (QT-drugs)] increase the risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Such drugs are categorized in multiple clinically widely used CredibleMeds.org lists. Category 1 ('known risk of Torsade de Pointes') and category 2 ('possible risk of Torsade de Pointes') are of particular clinical relevance. However, a category-stratified analysis of OHCA-risk is presently unavailable. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a case-control study with OHCA-cases from presumed cardiac causes included from the ARREST registry in the Netherlands (2009-2018) that was specifically designed to study OHCA, and age/sex/OHCA-date matched non-OHCA-controls. Adjusted odds ratios for OHCA (ORadj) of QT-drugs from categories 1 or 2 were calculated, using conditional logistic regression. Stratified analysis was performed according to sex, age, and presence of cardiovascular drugs (proxy for cardiovascular disease). We included 5473 OHCA-cases (68.8 years, 69.9% men) and matched them to 20 866 non-OHCA-controls. Compared with no use of non-cardiac QT-drugs, drugs of both categories were associated with increased OHCA-risk, but seemingly weaker for category 2 {category 1: case 3.2%, control 1.4%, ORadj 1.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-2.1]}; [category 2: case 7.3%, control 4.0%, ORadj 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2-1.6)]. The increased risk occurred in men and women, at all ages (highest in patients aged ≤50 years), and both in the presence or absence of cardiovascular drug use. CONCLUSION: Both category 1 and category 2 QT-drugs are associated with increased OHCA-risk in both sexes, at all ages, and in patients taking or not taking cardiovascular drugs.

Medication Use and Clinical Outcomes by the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing Medicines Program: Quantitative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA) Medicines Program was set up in September 2018 to evaluate expensive medicine use in daily practice in terms of real-world effectiveness using only existing data sources. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the potential of the addition of declaration data to quality registries to provide participating centers with benchmark information about the use of medicines and outcomes among patients. METHODS: A total of 3 national population-based registries were linked to clinical and financial data from the hospital pharmacy, the Dutch diagnosis treatment combinations information system including in-hospital activities, and survival data from health care insurers. The first results of the real-world data (RWD) linkage are presented using descriptive statistics to assess patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 21 Dutch hospitals participated in the DICA Medicines Program, which included 7412 patients with colorectal cancer, 1981 patients with metastasized colon cancer, 3860 patients with lung cancer, 1253 patients with metastasized breast cancer, and 7564 patients with rheumatic disease. The data were used for hospital benchmarking to gain insights into medication use in specific patient populations, treatment information, clinical outcomes, and costs. Detailed treatment information (duration and treatment steps) led to insights into differences between hospitals in daily clinical practices. Furthermore, exploratory analyses on clinical outcomes (TTNT and OS) were possible. CONCLUSIONS: The DICA Medicines Program shows that it is possible to gather and link RWD about medicines to 4 disease-specific population-based registries. Since these RWD became available with minimal registration burden and effort for hospitals, this method can be explored in other population-based registries to evaluate real-world efficacy.

Statins After Ischemic Stroke in the Oldest: A Cohort Study Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Database.

[Figure: see text].

Impact of anticoagulant exposure misclassification on the bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants.

AIMS: Drug exposure status based on routinely collected data might be misclassified when the database contains only prescriptions from 1 type of prescriber (e.g. general practitioner and not specialist). This study aims to quantify the impact of such exposure misclassification on the risk of major bleeding and stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). METHODS: Incident anticoagulant users (>12 mo free of anticoagulation use) in the Dutch PHARMO Database Network between 2008 and 2017 were included. Drug exposure was assessed using pharmacy dispensing information. The risks of hospital admission of major bleeding for DOAC vs. VKA users was assessed with Cox regression analysis, where exposure was based on all dispensings, on general practitioner (GP)-prescribed dispensings only or on specialist-prescribed dispensings only. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated also for hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding and stroke/TIA. RESULTS: We included 99 182 VKA-initiators and 21 795 DOAC-initiators. Use of DOAC was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKA use; HR 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.90), 0.78 (0.68-0.91) and 0.62 (0.50-0.76), for exposure based on complete dispensing information, only GP- and only specialist-prescribed dispensings, respectively. Similar results were found for the other bleeding outcomes. For stroke/TIA the HRs were 0.96 (0.84-1.09), 1.00 (0.84-1.18) and 0.72 (0.58-0.90), respectively. CONCLUSION: Including only GP-prescribed anticoagulant dispensings in this case did not materially impact the effect estimates compared to including all anticoagulant dispensings. Including only specialist-prescribed dispensings, however, strengthened the effect estimates.

Influence of allopurinol on thiopurine associated toxicity: A retrospective population-based cohort study.

AIMS: Thiopurines are important for treating inflammatory bowel disease, but are often discontinued due to adverse effects. Concomitant use of allopurinol might lower the risk of these unwanted effects, but large studies in the general population are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate rates of hepatotoxicity, myelotoxicity, pancreas toxicity and therapy persistence in adult thiopurine users with or without allopurinol. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted within current thiopurine users (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Among these patients, co-use of allopurinol was compared to non-use. Hazard ratios (HRs) for hepatotoxicity, myelotoxicity and pancreatitis were derived using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models, and were adjusted for potential confounders. Persistence of thiopurine use was evaluated using Log-rank statistics. RESULTS: Patients using thiopurines (n = 37 360) were identified of which 1077 were concomitantly taking allopurinol. A 58% decreased risk of hepatotoxicity was observed in those concomitantly taking allopurinol (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30-0.60; NNT 46). Rate of myelotoxicity (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89-1.03) was not influenced. Risk of pancreatitis was increased (HR 3.00; 95% CI 1.01-8.93; NNH 337), but was only seen in those with active gout (suggesting confounding by indication). Finally, allopurinol co-users were able to maintain thiopurine therapy over twice as long as those not on allopurinol (3.9 years vs. 1.8 years, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In thiopurine users, allopurinol is associated with a 58% reduced risk of hepatotoxicity. In addition, thiopurine persistence was prolonged by 2.1 years in allopurinol users. These data support the use of allopurinol in individuals requiring thiopurine therapy.

Sulfonylurea antidiabetics are associated with lower risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Real-world data from a population-based study.

AIMS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) mostly results from ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), often triggered by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Sulfonylurea (SU) antidiabetics can block myocardial ATP-regulated K+ channels (KATP channels), activated during AMI, thereby modulating action potential duration (APD). We studied whether SU drugs impact on OHCA risk, and whether these effects are related to APD changes. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study in 219 VT/VF-documented OHCA cases with diabetes and 697 non-OHCA controls with diabetes. We studied the association of SU drugs (alone or in combination with metformin) with OHCA risk compared to metformin monotherapy, and of individual SU drugs compared to glimepiride, using multivariable logistic regression analysis. We studied the effects of these drugs on APD during simulated ischaemia using patch-clamp studies in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. RESULTS: Compared to metformin, use of SU drugs alone or in combination with metformin was associated with reduced OHCA risk (ORSUdrugs-alone 0.6 [95% CI 0.4-0.9], ORSUdrugs + metformin 0.6 [95% CI 0.4-0.9]). We found no differences in OHCA risk between SU drug users who suffered OHCA inside or outside the context of AMI. Reduction of OHCA risk compared to glimepiride was found with gliclazide (ORadj 0.5 [95% CI 0.3-0.9]), but not glibenclamide (ORadj 1.3 [95% CI 0.6-2.7]); for tolbutamide, the association with reduced OHCA risk just failed to reach statistical significance (ORadj 0.6 [95% CI 0.3-1.002]). Glibenclamide attenuated simulated ischaemia-induced APD shortening, while the other SU drugs had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: SU drugs were associated with reduced OHCA risk compared to metformin monotherapy, with gliclazide having a lower risk than glimepiride. The differential effects of SU drugs are not explained by differential effects on APD.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in UK patients with atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To estimate the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in AF patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed, using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (August 2011-June 2018). Participants were 1-year naïve users of DOACs or warfarin, followed from the date of first prescription of an oral anticoagulant until the end of the study period, death, discontinuation of treatment, switching to another anticoagulant, or an outcome of interest, whichever came first. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 8555 patients were identified. No significant differences were found between DOACs and warfarin in the risk of stroke (adjusted HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.82-1.60), ischemic and unspecified stroke (adjusted HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.86-1.76) or haemorrhagic stroke (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.30-1.85), and myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 1.39;95% CI 0.99-1.97). DOAC and warfarin users were comparable with respect to risk of major bleed (adjusted HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.68-1.03), intracranial bleeding (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.34-1.30), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.60-1.30), and bleeding on other clinically relevant sites (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.60-1.31). In the subgroup analyses stratified by gender and diabetes severity, the risk for stroke and bleeding remained consistent. CONCLUSION: DOACs are effective and safe alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in AF patients with T2DM.

Drug exposure misclassification in pharmacoepidemiology: Sources and relative impact.

BACKGROUND: Drug exposure assessment based on dispensing data can be misclassified when patients do not adhere to their therapy or when information about over-the-counter drugs is not captured in the study database. Previous research has considered hypothetical sensitivity and specificity values, whereas this study aims to assess the impact of literature-based real values of exposure misclassification. METHODS: A synthetic cohort study was constructed based on the proportion of exposure theoretically captured in a database (range 0.5-1.0) and the level of adherence (0.5-1.0). Three scenarios were explored: nondifferential misclassification, differential misclassification (misclassifications dependent on an unmeasured risk factor doubling the outcome risk), and nondifferential misclassification in a comparative effectiveness study (RRA and RRB both 2.0 compared to nonuse, RRA-B 1.0). RESULTS: For the scenarios with nondifferential misclassification, 25% nonadherence or 25% uncaptured exposure changed the RR from 2.0 to 1.75, and 1.95, respectively. Applying different proportions of nonadherence or uncaptured use (20% vs. 40%) for subgroups with and without the risk factor, an RR of 0.95 was observed in the absence of a true effect (i.e., true RR = 1). In the comparative effectiveness study, no effect on RR was seen for different proportions of uncaptured exposure; however, different levels of nonadherence for the drugs (20% vs. 40%) led to an underestimation of RRA-B (0.89). DISCUSSION: All scenarios led to biased estimates, but the magnitude of the bias differed across scenarios. When testing the robustness of findings of pharmacoepidemiologic studies, we recommend using realistic values of nonadherence and uncaptured exposure based on real-world data.

Real-world outcomes of advanced melanoma patients not represented in phase III trials.

The aim was to provide evidence on systemically treated patients with advanced melanoma not represented in phase III trials to support clinical decision-making. Analysis were performed on advanced melanoma patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 in the Netherlands, treated with immune- or targeted therapy, who met ≥1 trial exclusion criteria. These criteria were derived from the KEYNOTE-006 and CHECKMATE-067/-066 phase III trials. Prognostic importance of factors associated with overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox models, predicted OS probabilities of prognostic subgroups and a conditional inference survival tree (CIST). A nationwide population-based registry was used as data source. Of 2536 systemically treated patients with advanced melanoma, 1004 (40%) patients were ineligible for phase IIII trials. Ineligible patients had a poorer median OS (mOS) compared to eligible patients (8.8 vs 23 months). Eligibility criteria strongly associated with OS in systemically treated ineligible patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS) ≥2, brain metastases (BM) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of >500 U/L. Patients with ECOG PS of ≥2 with or without symptomatic BM had a predicted mOS of 6.5 and 11.3 months and a 3-year survival probability of 9.3% and 23.6%, respectively. The CIST showed the strongest prognostic covariate for survival was LDH, followed by ECOG PS. The prognosis of patients with LDH of >500 U/L is poor, but long-term survival is possible. The prognosis of ineligible patients with advanced melanoma in real-world was very heterogeneous and highly dependent on LDH value, ECOG PS and symptomatic BM.

C-reactive protein as a biomarker of response to inhaled corticosteroids among patients with COPD.

AIMS: C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important biomarker in systemic inflammation in COPD; reports have suggested inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) attenuate CRP levels. We evaluated the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among patients with COPD currently exposed to Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) stratified by CRP levels compared to never ICS users with low CRP levels. METHODS: We included subjects age 40 or more who had a diagnosis of COPD from January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2014 from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). ICS exposure was determined time-dependently, as current, recent, past or never users. We evaluated the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among ICS users stratified by CRP levels. RESULTS: 17,722 subjects diagnosed with COPD met the inclusion criteria. Among current or never ICS with elevated CRP levels we found, no significantly reduced risk of moderate-to-severe or severe exacerbations. For patients currently exposed ICS with CRP levels ≥8 mg/L there was no reduced risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations (adjusted hazard ratio [adj. HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.31) or severe exacerbations (adj.HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.71-3.27). However, we found an increased risk of all-cause mortality among COPD patients with CRP levels ≥8 mg/L irrespective of ICS exposure. CONCLUSION: We did not find a reduced risk of moderate and/or severe COPD exacerbations among COPD patients with varying CRP levels currently exposed to ICS. However, low-grade systemic inflammation was associated with all-cause mortality among COPD patients.

Developing patient-centric medicines for older people: Reflections from the draft EMA paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population.

Increased global longevity requires a re-evaluation of current structures in society to adapt to the consequential demographic shift. As (very) old people are prone to impaired human organ and body functions resulting in, for example, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, hospitalisation and problems in medication management, it is increasingly acknowledged that re-evaluations should include the suitability of pharmaceutical patient care as one of the cornerstones of public health. Following the 2011 European Medicines Agency (EMA) Geriatric Strategy, in 2017 the EMA published the draft "Reflection paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population". The draft paper was opened for public consultation and specific attention and feedback (either supportive or with a proposal for revision) was asked on three design aspects: tablet breaking, drug administration through enteral feeding tubes and medication management. Following publication, the draft paper was presented at two public conferences attended by participants from different disciplines. This manuscript is intended to draw the attention of different stakeholder parties to the urgent need to collaborate on the emerging issues arising from increasing longevity and multimorbidity, and especially those associated with pharmaceutical patient care and drug product design, including the need for collaborative research into existing or emerging knowledge gaps. The manuscript focuses on the three aforementioned aspects of pharmaceutical development (tablet breaking, drug administration through enteral feeding tubes and medication management) as these highly relate to medication safety and efficacy and constitute persistent and typical challenges for older people, caregivers and healthcare professionals in daily clinical practice.

Medication safety in patients with hepatic impairment: A survey of community pharmacists' knowledge level and their practice in caring for these patients.

AIMS: To study community pharmacists' level of knowledge on medication safety in patients with hepatic impairment and their practice in caring for these patients. METHODS: Pharmacists from Dutch community pharmacies (n = 1545) were invited to participate in an online survey. The survey consisted of 27 questions covering 2 main topics: knowledge and current practice. The level of knowledge was measured by a 6-item knowledge test. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of correctly answered responses. RESULTS: In total, 338 pharmacists (22%) completed the questionnaire. The mean knowledge score was 2.8 (standard deviation 1.6). Only 30.3% of respondents were able to appropriately advise on use of analgesics in severe cirrhosis. Postgraduate education on hepatic impairment, knowledge of recently developed practical guidance, and fewer years of practice were associated with a higher level of knowledge. In total, 70.4% indicated to evaluate medication safety in a patient with hepatic impairment at least once weekly. In the past 6 months, 83.3% of respondents consulted a prescriber about a patient with hepatic impairment. Frequently encountered barriers in practice were insufficient knowledge on the topic and a lack of essential patient information (i.e. diagnosis and severity of the impairment). CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists regularly evaluate the safety of medication in patients with hepatic impairment, yet their level of knowledge was insufficient and additional education is needed. Pharmacists experienced several difficulties in providing pharmaceutical care. If these issues are resolved, pharmacists can play a more active role in ensuring medication safety in their patients with hepatic impairment.

Risk of major bleeding among users of direct oral anticoagulants combined with interacting drugs: A population-based nested case-control study.

AIMS: To assess the association between concurrent use of potential pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interacting drugs and major bleeding among direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users. METHODS: We performed a case-control study nested in a cohort of new users of DOACs (dabigatran etexilate, apixaban or rivaroxaban). Data were obtained from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (2008-2015). Cases were patients hospitalized having a primary diagnosis of major bleeding. Up to 4 controls were matched on age, sex, index date and region. Odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of major bleeding were assessed by conditional logistic regression analysis and adjusted for well-known covariates for the risk of bleeding. RESULTS: We identified 393 patients with a major bleeding from a total of 23 492 new users of DOACs and 1494 matched controls. Most subjects were users of rivaroxaban (58.8%) on the index date. The concurrent use of pharmacodynamic interacting drugs was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (21.6% of cases vs 13.5% of controls, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.66). For the antiplatelet drugs the aOR was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.29-3.11) and for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors the aOR was 1.68 (95% CI, 1.10-2.59). We found no increased risk of major bleeding for concurrent use of pharmacokinetic interacting drugs vs DOACs alone (45.0 vs 51.2%; aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.10). CONCLUSION: Among patients taking DOACs the concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors was associated with increased risk of major bleeding, while pharmacokinetic interacting drugs do not increase this risk.