Blinded comparison of computed tomography, ultrasound and needle methods to measure skin flap thickness for cochlear implantation.

PURPOSE: Patient suitability for cochlear implant (CI) devices compatible with magnetic resonance imaging and CI processor configuration is dependent on their retro-auricular skin flap thickness. This is typically measured intra-operatively using a needle and therefore patients are not guaranteed their implant of choice prior to surgery. We aimed to identify an accurate method to measure skin flap thickness pre-operatively to streamline CI selection and simplify the consent process. METHODS: Blinded prospective skin flap thickness measurements for patients undergoing CI surgery were recorded using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US), and intraoperative needle measurement. RESULTS: Fifty-six adult patients (36 females, 20 males; mean age 59 years) were included. The mean flap thickness was measured highest by CT (6.9 mm, 95% CI 6.5-7.3 mm), followed by US (6.3 mm, 95% CI 5.9-6.7 mm) and lastly needle (5.5 mm, 95% CI 5.1-5.9 mm) (p < 0.0001). A strong positive correlation (p < 0.001) was noted between all three modalities: CT vs needle (r = 0.869), US vs needle (r = 0.865), and CT vs US (r = 0.849). CONCLUSION: Accurate, non-invasive measurement of skin flap thickness prior to CI surgery can be achieved using CT or US. We recommend the routine use of US in the outpatient clinic to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure.

Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults.

BACKGROUND: Adult cochlear implant (CI) candidacy is assessed in part by the use of speech perception measures. In the United Kingdom the current cut-off point to fall within the CI candidacy range is a score of less than 50% on the BKB sentences presented in quiet (presented at 70 dBSPL). GOAL: The specific goal of this article was to review the benefit of adding the AB word test to the assessment test battery for candidacy. RESULTS: The AB word test scores showed good sensitivity and specificity when calculated based on both word and phoneme scores. The word score equivalent for 50% correct on the BKB sentences was 18.5% and it was 34.5% when the phoneme score was calculated; these scores are in line with those used in centres in Wales (15% AB word score). CONCLUSION: The goal of the British Cochlear Implant Group (BCIG) service evaluation was to determine if the pre-implant assessment measures are appropriate and set at the correct level for determining candidacy, the future analyses will determine whether the speech perception cut-off point for candidacy should be adjusted and whether other more challenging measures should be used in the candidacy evaluation.