Improving pharmacovigilance in Europe: TPMT genotyping and phenotyping in the UK and Spain.

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is the rate-limiting step in the conversion of thiopurine drugs including azathioprine (AZA) to inactive metabolites. Heritable deficiency of TPMT activity increases risk for adverse events, most notably, myelosuppression leading to leukopenia and neutropenic sepsis. The reported European Commission study was undertaken to identify current evidence for the clinical utility of testing for TPMT status and extent of uptake, by either genotyping or phenotyping, in the clinical setting. Data presented here for the UK and Spain indicate that there has been a considerable increase in the uptake of TPMT testing in recent years. There are some data that support routine TPMT testing before AZA prescribing for reducing AZA-related adverse events. Key data include evidence in favor of TPMT testing in addition to the current practice of routine monitoring for reducing the number of AZA-related episodes of myelosuppression, averting deaths from neutropenic sepsis and improving health-related quality of life. Further data are needed for determining the cost-effectiveness of routine TPMT testing.

CYP2D6 genotyping for psychiatric patients treated with risperidone: considerations for cost-effectiveness studies.

In order to ascertain data availability and feasibility for conducting cost-effectiveness studies in pharmacogenetics, and as part of a European Commission Joint Research Center, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS) study, data concerning risperidone use and cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6) genotyping in medical care was collected in Germany, Spain and the USA, and are summarized in this perspective. The gene coding for CYP2D6 is highly polymorphic, resulting in a significant part of the population being poor metabolizers and ultrarapid metabolizers. Individuals who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, have an increased risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) when treated with CYP2D6-metabolized drugs, suggesting that CYP2D6 genotyping might be beneficial for patient care. This might be especially important in psychiatry, where approximately 50% of the patients use at least one drug primarily metabolized by CYP2D6. In particular, ADRs and poor response to treatment are major problems for some antipsychotics, including risperidone. However, there are no published cost-effectiveness studies on CYP2D6 genotyping, and the benefit that pharmacogenetic testing might represent by identifying problematic patients is still unclear. The present European Commission study found that current clinical and economical data concerning the frequency and direct healthcare costs of risperidone-related ADRs, the relation of such ADRs with the patients CYP2D6 genotypes, and costs for CYP2D6 genotyping, are not sufficient for determining if routine CYP2D6 genotyping might be cost beneficial for patients treated with risperidone. Therefore, efforts should be put on performing prospective cost-benefit studies with randomized treatment according to the CYP2D6 genotype to establish the utility of CYP2D6 genotyping for personalizing antipsychotic treatment.

Avoiding adverse drug reactions by pharmacogenetic testing: a systematic review of the economic evidence in the case of TPMT and AZA-induced side effects.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims at evaluating the economic evidence related to testing for genetic variants of the drug-metabolizing enzyme, TPMT. Detecting TPMT genetic variants before the administration of azathioprine (AZA) has the potential to prevent serious and costly adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as neutropenia. In particular, our analysis concentrated on assessing the reliability of data on costs of neutropenia and performing the tests, the two main cost categories that could inform an economic evaluation of TPMT pharmacogenetic testing. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to gather evidence on the costs of testing and neutropenia. Articles were critically appraised for their comprehensiveness and quality. To better estimate costs of TPMT tests, a small-scale survey of European diagnostic laboratories was conducted. RESULTS: Only seven articles were retrieved specifying the costs associated with the management and treatment of AZA-induced neutropenia. Most of these studies are based on theoretical modeling reconstructed with key-informants or on very few cases of ADRs, and either the methodology for cost calculation is not specified or costs are based on national cost databases and tariffs. After critical appraisal of these studies, we considered 2,116 euros as the most reliable estimate for the cost of a case of neutropenia. Literature review accompanied by the survey of several diagnostic laboratories also provided an estimate (68 euros) for TPMT testing. Based on these values, the net cost per prevented case of neutropenia equals to 5,300 euros. CONCLUSIONS: Solid economic considerations related to TPMT pharmacogenetic testing are still limited by underreporting of ADRs and high level of approximation related to cost data. Ad hoc observational studies and the ADR recording process embedded in pharmacovigilance systems, established across Europe, should represent more reliable sources of cost data in the future.