13N-ammonia PET/CT stress myocardial blood flow compared to fractional flow reserve in coronary artery disease.

AIM: In this retrospective study, fractional flow reserve was compared to stress myocardial blood flow derived by -ammonia (-NH3) myocardial perfusion PET/CT. METHODS: From a large cohort of patients referred for -NH3 PET/CT, patients who also had fractional flow reserve-measurements within 6 months of the PET study were selected. These fractional flow reserve measurements were compared to PET/CT derived stress myocardial blood flow of the corresponding coronary territory. Results were categorized as concordant or discordant. Patients with discordant results were subdivided into a group with reduced fractional flow reserve but normal stress myocardial blood flow (group A) or into a group with normal fractional flow reserve but reduced stress myocardial blood flow (group B). RESULTS: From September 2013 through July 2016, 46 patients examined with -NH3 PET/CT also had fractional flow reserve-measurements within 6 months. A total of 66 measurements were used for comparison. Discordance was found in 32% of the measurements. Group B showed a significant reduction in stress myocardial blood flow of all coronary territories compared to group A (P = 0.000). During follow-up (median 3.96 years), group B showed more visits to the emergency department and newly developed heart failure. CONCLUSION: Discordance with stress myocardial blood flow in the corresponding flow territory was found in 32% of the fractional flow reserve-measurements. Patients with reduced stress myocardial blood flow but normal fractional flow reserve showed significantly reduced stress myocardial blood flow in all coronaries and a trend towards more cardiac adverse events.

Major adverse cardiac events during endurance sports.

Major adverse cardiac events in endurance exercise are usually due to underlying and unsuspected heart disease. The investigators present an analysis of major adverse cardiac events that occurred during 2 consecutive annual long distance races (a 36-km beach cycling race and a 21-km half marathon) over the past 5 years. All patients with events were transported to the hospital. Most of the 62,862 participants were men (77%; mean age 40 years). Of these, 4 men (3 runners, 1 cyclist; mean age 48 years) collapsed during (n = 2) or shortly after the races, rendering a prevalence of 0.006%. Two patients collapsed after developing chest pain, 1 of whom needed resuscitation at the event site, which was successful. These patients had acute myocardial infarctions and underwent primary angioplasty. The third patient was resuscitated at the site but did not have coronary disease or inducible ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation and collapsed presumably because of catecholamine-induced ventricular fibrillation. The fourth patient experienced heat stroke and had elevated creatine kinase-MB and troponins in the absence of electrocardiographic changes. In conclusion, the risk for major adverse cardiac events during endurance sports in well-trained athletes is very low.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time.

We investigated whether primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients admitted with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction could be performed more rapidly and with comparable outcomes in a community hospital versus a tertiary center with cardiac surgery. We started the first PCI with an off-site surgery program in The Netherlands in 2002 and report the results of 439 consecutive patients. In the safety phase, 199 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to treatment at our off-site center versus a more distant cardiac surgery center. In the confirmation phase, 240 consecutive patients were treated in the off-site hospital. Safety and efficacy end points were the rate of an angiographically successful PCI procedure (diameter stenosis <50% and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow) in the absence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The randomization phase showed a 37-minute decrease in door-to-balloon time (p <0.001) with comparable procedural and clinical successes (91% Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow in the 2 groups). In the confirmation phase, the 30-day rate without major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 95%. None of the 439 patients in the study required emergency surgery for failed primary PCI. In conclusion, time to treatment with primary PCI can be significantly shortened when treating patients in a community hospital setting with off-site cardiac surgery backup compared with transport for PCI to a referral center with on-site surgery. PCI at hospitals with off-site cardiac surgery backup can be considered a needed strategy to improve access to primary PCI for a larger segment of the population and can be delivered with a very favorable safety profile.

Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) pump function is optimal when pacing is performed at the LV near the sites where the impulses exit the Purkinje system. BACKGROUND: Pacing at the conventional site, the right ventricular (RV) apex, adversely affects hemodynamics. During normal sinus rhythm (SR), electrical activation of the working myocardium starts at the LV septal endocardium and spreads from apex to base. METHODS: Experiments were conducted in anesthetized open-chest dogs with normal ventricular conduction to investigate hemodynamic effects of pacing at various epicardial LV sites, the RV apex, and combinations of these sites (n = 11) and of RV and LV septal pacing (n = 8). The LV septal endocardium was reached via the RV by puncturing through the septum with a barbed electrode. Left ventricular systolic (LVdP/dtpos and stroke work) and diastolic (LVdP/dtneg and Tau) function were assessed using pressure-volume relations (conductance catheter technique). RESULTS: Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function were highly dependent on the site of pacing, but not on QRS duration. Left ventricular function was maintained at SR level during LV septal, LV apex, and multisite pacing, was moderately depressed during pacing at epicardial LV free wall sites, and was most severely depressed during RV apex pacing. On average, RV septal pacing did not improve LV function, compared with RV apex pacing, but in each experiment one (variable) RV pacing site was found, which only moderately reduced LV function. CONCLUSIONS: During ventricular pacing, LV pump function is maintained best (i.e., at SR level) when pacing at the LV septum or LV apex, potentially because pacing from these sites creates a physiological propagation of electrical conduction.

Escitalopram in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients.

AIM: The primary aim was to investigate the long-term safety and tolerability of escitalopram (10 or 20 mg/day) treatment of elderly patients suffering from major depressive disorder. The secondary aim was to examine response to treatment, as measured by change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from study entry to each visit, using observed cases. METHOD: This extension trial included 225 patients who had completed an 8-week, double blind, placebo-controlled lead-in study, which was performed in outpatients in primary care and in specialist clinics. The intent-to-treat population comprised 223 patients. RESULTS: The overall withdrawal rate was 24%. The most common reason for withdrawal was adverse events (9%). The 5 most common adverse events were accidental injury, rhinitis, weight increase, arthralgia and coughing, with an incidence ranging from 8 to 13%. No new types of adverse events were reported in this extension study compared to the 8-week lead-in study. The mean weight increased from 69.7 kg at study entry to 70.3 kg at endpoint. The percentage of patients in remission (MADRS total score < or = 12) increased from 48% at study entry to 72% by week 52. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram demonstrated a favourable tolerability profile during 52 weeks of open-label treatment of elderly patients, with further improvement in depressive symptoms.

Escitalopram in the treatment of depressed elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: Management of depression in elderly patients presents a significant medical challenge, and there is a need for further clinical trials. The authors examined the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram and fluoxetine versus placebo in the treatment of elderly patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram (10 mg/day) and fluoxetine (20 mg/day), to placebo in elderly patients with MDD. The prospectively defined primary efficacy parameter was the change from baseline in mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at endpoint, using last observation carried forward. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat set comprised 517 patients; the escitalopram group included 173 patients; fluoxetine, 164 patients; and placebo, 180 patients. Mean age was 75 years, with a range of 65 to 93. Formally, this was a "failed study" (i.e., neither active treatment was superior to placebo), and the efficacy results should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. On the basis of the primary efficacy parameter, fluoxetine showed significantly lower efficacy than both escitalopram and placebo, which were not significantly different from each other. Rates of withdrawal because of adverse events/lack of efficacy were: placebo (2.8%/4.4%, respectively), escitalopram (9.8%/1.7%, respectively), and fluoxetine (12.2%/1.8%, respectively). No single adverse event occurred at an incidence > or =10% in escitalopram-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both escitalopram and fluoxetine were well tolerated by elderly patients with MDD. Neither demonstrated superior efficacy on primary endpoint versus placebo.