Development of pathogenicity predictors specific for variants that do not comply with clinical guidelines for the use of computational evidence.

BACKGROUND: Strict guidelines delimit the use of computational information in the clinical setting, due to the still moderate accuracy of in silico tools. These guidelines indicate that several tools should always be used and that full coincidence between them is required if we want to consider their results as supporting evidence in medical decision processes. Application of this simple rule certainly decreases the error rate of in silico pathogenicity assignments. However, when predictors disagree this rule results in the rejection of potentially valuable information for a number of variants. In this work, we focus on these variants of the protein sequence and develop specific predictors to help improve the success rate of their annotation. RESULTS: We have used a set of 59,442 protein sequence variants (15,723 pathological and 43,719 neutral) from 228 proteins to identify those cases for which pathogenicity predictors disagree. We have repeated this process for all the possible combinations of five known methods (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, PON-P2, CADD and MutationTaster2). For each resulting subset we have trained a specific pathogenicity predictor. We find that these specific predictors are able to discriminate between neutral and pathogenic variants, with a success rate different from random. They tend to outperform the constitutive methods but this trend decreases as the performance of the constitutive predictor improves (e.g. with PON-P2 and PolyPhen-2). We also find that specific methods outperform standard consensus methods (Condel and CAROL). CONCLUSION: Focusing development efforts on the case of variants for which known methods disagree we may obtain pathogenicity predictors with improved performances. Although we have not yet reached the success rate that allows the use of this computational evidence in a clinical setting, the simplicity of the approach indicates that more advanced methods may reach this goal in a close future.

Molecular analysis of the novel L243R mutation in STXBP2 reveals impairment of degranulation activity.

The presence of mutations in PRF1, UNC13D, STX11 and STXBP2 genes in homozygosis or compound heterozygosis results in immune deregulation. Most such cases lead to clinical manifestations of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). In the present study, we analyzed degranulation and cytotoxicity in a pediatric patient with a late presentation of HLH associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Remarkably, the results of the degranulation assay showed reduction of CD107a median fluorescence intensity (MFI) and absent cytotoxicity. Genetic analysis identified compound heterozygous mutations in STXBP2 gene: a previously reported splicing defect in exon 15 (c.1247-1G>C, p.V417LfsX126) and a novel missense mutation in exon 9 (c.728T>G, p.L243R). Transfection experiments of STXBP2-L243R or STXBP2-WT constructs showed an undetectable protein expression of the STXBP2-L243R mutation. The residue L243 is highly preserved evolutionarily; moreover, computational analysis of its structure revealed its participation in the rich network of interactions that stabilizes domains 2 and 3 of the protein. Altogether, we demonstrated by molecular and in silico analysis that the new L243R mutation in STXBP2 plays a pathogenic role that, together with the p.Val417Leufsc mutation, shows the synergistic negative effect of these two mutations on STXBP2 function, leading to a decrease of degranulatory activity in vivo.