Decrease in viral load at weeks 12 and 24 in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with lamivudine or adefovir predicts virological response at week 48.

AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the decrease in viral load (VL) that is able to predict antiviral treatment response at one year in patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: The clinical records of 66 patients, 31 treated with lamivudine (LAM) and 35 treated with adefovir (ADF), were retrospectively reviewed. We measured viral DNA at months 1, 3 and 6. RESULTS: The LAM group showed virological response (VR) in 51.6% of patients. Baseline VL was higher in non responders (5.37 +/- 1.16 vs. 7.01 +/- 1.05; p < 0.001). Responders showed a higher percentage of VL decrease at month 3 from baseline (49.2 vs. 38.3%; p = 0.03). We designed a ROC curve and established a cutoff point for decrease of 30% that had 80% of negative predictive value (NPV).The ADF group showed VR in 57.1% of patients. Baseline VL was higher in nonresponders (4.67 +/- 1.22 vs. 5.78 +/- 1.34; p = 0.01). We observed a significant decrease in VL (log) at months 3 (2.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.3 +/- 1.3; p = 0.03) and 6 (2.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.3 +/- 1.2; p = 0.006). The percentage of decrease of VL from baseline was also statistically significant. We created ROC curves at months 3 and 6, and established the best cutoff points. At month 6 a decrease of 1 log in VL had a NPV of 80%, and a decrease of 20% in VL from baseline had 100% NPV. CONCLUSION: The decrease in viral DNA at weeks 12 and 24 can predict VR at one year in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with LAM or ADF. This could optimize treatment.

Effectiveness of low-dose intramuscular anti-VHB immune globulin in the prophylaxis of viral B hepatitis reinfection after liver transplantation: preliminary report.

INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis using high-dose intravenous anti-HBV immune globulin (HBIG) is effective to prevent reinfection due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, this treatment is expensive and intravenous administration is difficult during outpatient care. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose intramuscular HBIG to prevent HBV reinfection after OLT. PATIENTS: Six patients (all men, mean age 41 years, negative HBV DNA without hepatotropic virus coinfection) were transplanted in our institution due to HBV cirrhosis and included in a prospective noncomparative study. Intramuscular HBIG (2000 IU) was administered during the anhepatic phase of OLT, followed by daily 2000 IU doses for 7 days and then monthly. HBV antibody titers were measured every month. Reinfection was defined as the recurrence of surface HBV antigen in serum after transplantation. RESULTS: After 1 year follow-up, none of the six patients had detectable HBV surface antigen and the liver biopsies were normal in all cases. Using 2000 IU, anti-HBs levels were: 880+/-356 IU/L at 1 month, 191+/-123 at 6 months, and 225+/-49 after 1 year. In all cases anti-HBs titers were above 100 IU/L during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly administration of low-dose (2000 IU) intramuscular HBIG effectively prevents recurrence of HBV infection as well as attains a protective level of anti-HBs antibodies (over 100 IU/L) for at least the first year after transplantation.