The geographical distribution and socioeconomic risk factors of COVID-19, tuberculosis and leprosy in Fortaleza, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Fortaleza (Brazil) is high endemic for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy. These three diseases share respiratory droplets through coughing or sneezing as the main mode of transmission but differ in incubation time, with COVID-19 having a short and leprosy a long incubation time. Consequently, contacts of a patient are at higher risk of infection and developing these diseases. There might be scope for combined preventive measures, but a better understanding of the geographical distribution and relevant socioeconomic risk factors of the three diseases is needed first. This study aims to describe the geographic distribution of COVID-19, TB and leprosy incidence and to identify common socioeconomic risk factors. METHODS: The total number of new cases of COVID-19, TB and leprosy, as well as socioeconomic and demographic variables, were retrieved from official registers. The geographical distribution of COVID-19, TB and leprosy rates per neighbourhood was visualised in Quantum GIS, and spatial autocorrelation was measured with Moran's I in GeoDa. A spatial regression model was applied to understand the association between COVID-19, TB, leprosy rates, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: COVID-19 and TB showed a more homogenous distribution, whereas leprosy is located more in the south and west of Fortaleza. One neighbourhood (Pedras) in the southeast was identified as high endemic for all three diseases. Literacy was a socioeconomic risk factor for all three diseases: a high literacy rate increases the risk of COVID-19, and a low literacy rate (i.e., illiteracy) increases the risk of TB and leprosy. In addition, high income was associated with COVID-19, while low income with TB. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the similar mode of transmission, COVID-19, TB and leprosy show a different distribution of cases in Fortaleza. In addition, associated risk factors are related to wealth in COVID-19 and to poverty in TB and leprosy. These findings may support policymakers in developing (partially combined) primary and secondary prevention considering the efficient use of resources.

Determining target populations for leprosy prophylactic interventions: a hotspot analysis in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy incidence remained at around 200,000 new cases globally for the last decade. Current strategies to reduce the number of new patients include early detection and providing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to at-risk populations. Because leprosy is distributed unevenly, it is crucial to identify high-risk clusters of leprosy cases for targeting interventions. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) methodology can be used to optimize leprosy control activities by identifying clustering of leprosy cases and determining optimal target populations for PEP. METHODS: The geolocations of leprosy cases registered from 2014 to 2018 in Pasuruan and Pamekasan (Indonesia) were collected and tested for spatial autocorrelation with the Moran's I statistic. We did a hotspot analysis using the Heatmap tool of QGIS to identify clusters of leprosy cases in both areas. Fifteen cluster settings were compared, varying the heatmap radius (i.e., 500 m, 1000 m, 1500 m, 2000 m, or 2500 m) and the density of clustering (low, moderate, and high). For each cluster setting, we calculated the number of cases in clusters, the size of the cluster (km2), and the total population targeted for PEP under various strategies. RESULTS: The distribution of cases was more focused in Pasuruan (Moran's I = 0.44) than in Pamekasan (0.27). The proportion of total cases within identified clusters increased with heatmap radius and ranged from 3% to almost 100% in both areas. The proportion of the population in clusters targeted for PEP decreased with heatmap radius from > 100% to 5% in high and from 88 to 3% in moderate and low density clusters. We have developed an example of a practical guideline to determine optimal cluster settings based on a given PEP strategy, distribution of cases, resources available, and proportion of population targeted for PEP. CONCLUSION: Policy and operational decisions related to leprosy control programs can be guided by a hotspot analysis which aid in identifying high-risk clusters and estimating the number of people targeted for prophylactic interventions.

Testing the psychometric properties of the Participation Scale in Eastern Nepal.

PURPOSE: To test the psychometric properties of the Participation Scale (P-scale) among people with various disabling conditions in Eastern Nepal. METHODS: A sample of 153 individuals with disabling conditions was selected through systematic random sampling. The following psychometric properties were tested: structural validity (explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses), internal consistency, inter-tester reliability, construct validity and floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS: The explanatory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure ('work-related participation' and 'general participation'). The confirmatory factor analysis suggested good model fit. The internal consistency measured with Cronbach's alpha was 0.93 for the whole scale and 0.78 and 0.93 for the subscales. The inter-tester reliability coefficient was 0.90. All hypothesized correlations were as expected confirming the construct validity of the scale. No floor or ceiling effects were identified for the whole scale; only the subscale 'work-related participation' showed a ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: The results of the analyses suggest that the psychometric properties of the P-scale are sufficient in the context of Eastern Nepal. Use of the P-scale will require (re-) confirmation of its validity in each new cultural context.

Stigma and social participation in Southern India: differences and commonalities among persons affected by leprosy and persons living with HIV/AIDS.

Stigma is a common phenomenon worldwide and infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS and leprosy are often associated with high levels of stigma. Several studies have been conducted concerning the effects of stigma and the impact on social participation, but comparative studies are rare. The objective of this study was to identify differences and similarities between HIV/AIDS and leprosy-related stigma. From April till July 2009, 190 questionnaire-based interviews were conducted to assess the levels of internalized stigma (Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness scale), perceived stigma (Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue stigma scale) and social participation (Participation scale) in a cross-sectional sample of people affected by leprosy (PL) and people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA). Respondents were selected from several hospitals, charity projects and during home visits in Vellore district, Tamil Nadu. Our results showed that both PLHA (n = 95) and leprosy-affected respondents (n = 95) faced a substantial burden of internalized and perceived stigma, with the former reporting a significantly higher level of stigma. As a result, PLHA faced more frequent and also more severe participation restrictions than PL. Especially, restrictions in work-related areas were reported by the majority of the respondents. In conclusion, PLHA faced a significantly higher level of stigma and participation restriction than PL. However, the latter also reported a substantial burden of stigma and participation restrictions. The study suggests that it may be possible to develop joint interventions based on the commonalities found. More research is needed to define these more precisely and to test the effectiveness of such joint interventions in reducing stigma and improving social participation.

Reducing stigma and discrimination associated with COVID-19: early stage pandemic rapid review and practical recommendations.

AIMS: To develop recommendations for strategies and interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), through reviewing and synthesising evidence in relation to COVID-19 and other disease outbreaks and infectious/stigmatised conditions from systematic reviews and primary studies and recommendations from additional materials. METHODS: Rapid review, drawing on the World Health Organization's (WHO) methodology for developing interim guidelines during health emergencies. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central and Campbell Collaboration searched up to mid-April 2020. Searches were supplemented by reference-searching and expert recommendations. Searches were designed to identify: (1) systematic reviews (<10 years), or (2) primary intervention studies (no date limit) reporting evidence on anti-stigma interventions (in relation to COVID-19 or other infectious/stigmatised conditions) or (3) additional relevant materials. Data were extracted on population, intervention, outcome and results. These data were compiled into evidence summary tables and narrative overviews. Recommendations on strategies for COVID-19 stigma-reduction were developed using the WHO 'Evidence to Decision' framework approach. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42020177677). RESULTS: The searches identified a total of 4150 potentially relevant records, from which 12 systematic reviews and 29 additional articles were included. Overarching considerations and specific recommendations focus on: (1) language/words used in relation to COVID-19 and affected people; (2) media/journalistic practices; (3) public health interventions; (4) targeted public health interventions for key groups and (5) involving communities and key stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations represent the first consolidated evidence-based guidance on stigma and discrimination reduction in relation to COVID-19. Mitigating the impact of stigma is critical in reducing distress and negative experiences, and strengthening communities' resolve to work together during exceptional circumstances. Ultimately, reducing stigma helps addressing structural inequalities that drive marginalisation and exacerbate both health risks and the impact of stigma. Administrations and decision makers are urged to consider integrating these recommendations into the ongoing COVID-19 response.

The impact of leprosy on the mental wellbeing of leprosy-affected persons and their family members - a systematic review.

Leprosy has long-term consequences related to impairment and stigma. This includes a major impact on mental health. This study aims to consolidate current evidence regarding the mental health impact of leprosy on affected persons and their family members. In addition, determinants influencing mental health outcomes among leprosy-affected persons and effective interventions are examined. A keyword-based search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Infolep and InfoNTD; additional literature was also considered. Articles presenting primary data involving leprosy-affected persons or their family members experiencing mental conditions were included. Independent extraction of articles was executed using predefined data fields. Articles were sorted according to relevance. In total, 65 studies were included in this systematic review. Multiple psychiatric morbidities have been identified among leprosy-affected persons, including depression, anxiety disorders and suicide (attempts). Additional factors were found that may impact mental health. Moreover, studies found that demographic factors, lifestyle and disease-specific factors and stigma and discrimination impact mental health. Depressive symptoms and low self-esteem were identified among children of leprosy-affected persons. In addition, interventions were identified that could improve the mental wellbeing of leprosy patients. Depressive disorders and anxiety disorders were found to be very common among persons affected by leprosy. Feelings such as fear, shame and low self-esteem are also experienced by those affected, and their children. Further research is necessary to ensure that mental health impact is included when determining the burden of disease for leprosy, and to relieve this burden.

'People like me don't make things like that': Participatory video as a method for reducing leprosy-related stigma.

The Stigma Assessment and Reduction of Impact project aims to assess the effectiveness of stigma-reduction interventions in the field of leprosy. Participatory video seemed to be a promising approach to reducing stigma among stigmatized individuals (in this study the video makers) and the stigmatisers (video audience). This study focuses on the video makers and seeks to assess the impact on them of making a participatory video and to increase understanding of how to deal with foreseeable difficulties. Participants were selected on the basis of criteria and in collaboration with the community health centre. This study draws on six qualitative methods including interviews with the video makers and participant observation. Triangulation was used to increase the validity of the findings. Two videos were produced. The impact on participants ranged from having a good time to a greater sense of togetherness, increased self-esteem, individual agency and willingness to take action in the community. Concealment of leprosy is a persistent challenge, and physical limitations and group dynamics are also areas that require attention. Provided these three areas are properly taken into account, participatory video has the potential to address stigma at least at three levels - intrapersonal, interpersonal and community - and possibly more.

Risk factors for participation restriction in leprosy and development of a screening tool to identify individuals at risk.

The World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health defines participation as involvement in a life situation. Participation restrictions are problems experienced in any life situation, for example, in relationships or in employment. Our research explored risk factors for participation restrictions experienced by people affected by leprosy. Our objective was to develop a screening tool to identify individuals at risk. An initial round of qualitative fieldwork in eight centres in Nepal, India and Brazil identified 35 potential risk factors for participation restriction. These were then further assessed through quantitative fieldwork in six centres in India and Brazil. In all, 264 individuals receiving leprosy treatment or rehabilitation services made a retrospective assessment of their status at time of diagnosis. Their level of participation restriction was assessed using the Participation Scale. Regression analysis identified risk factors for participation restriction including fear of abandonment by family members (odds ratio 2.63, 95% CI 1.35-5.13) and hospitalization at diagnosis (3.98, 1.0-7.32). We recommend four consolidated items as the basis for a simple screening tool to identify individuals at risk. These are the physical impact of leprosy, an emotional response to the diagnosis, female gender and having little or no education. Such a tool may form the basis for a screening and referral procedure to identify newly diagnosed individuals at risk of participation restrictions and in need of actions that may prevent such restrictions.

Peripheral neuropathy in leprosy and its consequences.

Leprosy causes a 'mononeuritis multiplex' of immunological origin that results in autonomic, sensory and motor neuropathy. When detected and treated early, primary impairments may be reversible. However, 11-51% of patients do not recover. In addition, 33-56% of newly registered patients already have clinically detectable impairments, often no longer amenable to drug treatment. Among new patients, 6-27% present with secondary impairments, such as wounds, contractures and shortening of digits. All patients with impairments should be taught methods to prevent further impairment and subsequent disability (POID). As the result of impairments, many people experience limitation of activities of daily living, which can be partially overcome with the help of assistive devices, training, and surgery. As a result of these limitations, because of visible impairments, or simply because of the diagnosis 'leprosy', many people are restricted in their participation in society. Many overcome activity limitations and participation restrictions without assistance, despite residual impairments. However, some require intervention, such as physical or occupational therapy, reconstructive surgery or temporary socioeconomic assistance. Information on these issues is not collected routinely, and the few tools that exist to measure the severity or extent of impairment have not been widely used, nor have they been used to generate cohort-based statistics. There are no agreed indicators for monitoring POID activities or rehabilitation interventions. Work in the general field of rehabilitation has resulted in the ICIDH-2, which provides a conceptual framework for rehabilitation and the entire area of 'consequences of health conditions'. Although experience to date is very limited, the conceptual framework appears appropriate to leprosy. Data on the prevalence and incidence of primary and secondary impairments have been reported from several countries, the link between impairments and activity limitations has been investigated, and a few studies of the magnitude of the need for rehabilitation have been reported. Research priorities include studies of methods to improve detection of autonomic, sensory and motor neuropathy; trials of alternative drugs or regimens for treating neuropathy; studies of the use of various POID-monitoring systems that may be derived from these; studies of the design and use of instruments to assess limitations of activities and restrictions on participation; assessments of needs for rehabilitation and the development of methods to do these; studies of the efficacy of various types of rehabilitation interventions for particular conditions; and studies of the cost-effectiveness of such interventions.

Silent neuropathy in leprosy: an epidemiological description.

This paper presents epidemiological data on silent nerve function impairment in leprosy based on a retrospective study of 536 patients registered at Green Pastures Hospital, Pokhara, West Nepal. Because of the multiple possible aetiologies it is proposed that the clinical phenomenon should be named 'Silent Neuropathy' (SN). We defined this as sensory or motor impairment without skin signs of reversal reaction or erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), without evident nerve tenderness and without spontaneous complaints of nerve pain (burning or shooting pain), paraesthesia or numbness. The functioning of the main peripheral nerve trunks known to be affected in leprosy was assessed using a nylon filament to test touch thresholds and a manual voluntary muscle test to quantify muscle strength. Almost 7% of new patients had SN at first examination. The incidence rate of SN among the 336 new patients who were available for follow-up was 4.1 per 100 person years at risk. In total, 75% of all SN episodes diagnosed after the start of chemotherapy occurred during the first year of treatment. During steroid treatment the sensory and motor function in nerves affected by SN improved significantly (p = 0.012, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test) over a period of 3 months. The patients with more extensive clinical disease (3/9 or more body areas involved, more than 3 enlarged nerves or a positive skin smear) were found to be at increased risk of developing SN. We discuss 4 different possible aetiologies of SN: 1, Schwann cell pathology; 2, nerve fibrosis; 3, cell-mediated immune reaction; and 4, intra-neural ENL. Some epidemiological evidence is presented that suggests that SN cannot be equated with a 'reversal reaction expressing itself in the nerves'. It is recommended that all patients should have a nerve function assessment at every visit to the clinic at least during their first year of treatment. Regular nerve function assessment is essential to detect SN at an early stage and to prevent permanent impairment of nerve function.

Nerve damage in leprosy: an epidemiological and clinical study of 396 patients in west Nepal--Part 1. Definitions, methods and frequencies.

A historic cohort study was performed to determine the prevalence and incidence rates of nerve function impairment (NFI) as demonstrated by sensory testing with a nylon monofilament and standard tests of motor function. The records of 396 new leprosy patients registering at Green Pastures Hospital, Pokhara, between January 1988 and January 1992 were analysed. The mean follow-up period was 21 months. In all, 36% (141/396) of patients had either sensory or motor function impairment at their initial examination. For each nerve the prevalence of sensory and motor impairment is reported separately. The posterior tibial nerve was the most frequently affected (sensory) nerve (21%). Sensory impairment of the ulnar nerve was found in 17% of the patients; 8.8% had sensory impairment of the median nerve. The overall incidence rate of motor function impairment was 7.5 (5.4-10) per 100 person years at risk (PYAR). Sensory impairment had a significantly higher rate of 13 (10-17)/100 PYAR (rate ratio (1.8 (1.2-2.7), p = 0.0076). Bl patients had a significantly higher incidence rate of nerve function impairment than BT patients (rate ratio 2.3 (1.4-3.7), p = 0.006). Altogether 152/396 (39%) of the patients required corticosteroid treatment for 'recent' or 'acquired' impairment, and 78 of the patients (20%) developed severe nerve function impairment during or after antileprosy treatment. Analysis of potential risk factors for nerve function impairment showed a significant association with the extent of clinical disease expressed as the number of body areas (out of 9) with primary or secondary signs of leprosy (rate ratio 5.0 (1.5-17), p = 0.0091). It was concluded that nerve function impairment is a serious problem, often occurring during or after multidrug therapy. The extent of clinical disease expressed as a count of body areas involved, or of skin or nerve lesions may identify patients who are at increased risk of nerve damage.

Nerve function impairment in leprosy: an epidemiological and clinical study--Part 2: Results of steroid treatment.

This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the progress of sensory and motor function during and after steroid treatment, and to identify any prognostic factors for the outcome of treatment. The study used one hundred and sixty-eight leprosy patients registered at Green Pastures Hospital, Pokhara, West Nepal, who were treated with one of four different corticosteroid regimens for impairment of nerve function. The function of the main peripheral nerve trunks affected in leprosy was assessed with a nylon filament to test touch thresholds (TST) and a manual voluntary muscle test (VMT) to quantify muscle strength. The TST and VMT scores at 3 months after initiation of steroid treatment served as the main outcome measure. The significance of potential prognostic factors was evaluated with logistic regression. At 3 months, the sensory and motor function of the majority of patients with 'recent' impairment ( = less than 6 months duration) had improved significantly (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test). The likelihood of 'good' recovery (prognosis) for both sensibility and motor function was directly related to the severity of the nerve damage at the beginning of treatment. Although nerve function improved in 30-84% (depending on the type of nerve) of patients, an active search for better methods of treatment and improved regimens is justified. The need for early assessment and treatment is stressed.

The allocation of leprosy patients into paucibacillary and multibacillary groups for multidrug therapy, taking into account the number of body areas affected by skin, or skin and nerve lesions.

In Nepal, the setting up and maintaining of reliable services for slit-skin smears has proven difficult. A clinical classification system for leprosy has therefore been developed to assist in the allocation of patients to either paucibacillary or multibacillary groups for the purpose of multiple drug therapy (MDT), using 9 body areas: head (1), arms (2), legs (2), trunk (4). Patients with more than two areas of the body affected are grouped as multibacillary (MB) and those with only one or two areas affected are paucibacillary (PB). Using a computer simulation model and the data of 53 patients registered at Green Pastures Hospital (GPH) in Pokhara and 703 field patients from the Western Region, different clinical classification systems were evaluated with regard to their sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for MB or PB classification, as compared with the histological classification for the GPH cases and the bacteriological classification for the field patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the body area system in present use were 93% and 39%, respectively. The low specificity is due to MB overclassification. The sensitivity of the WHO classification system without skin smear facilities is 73% (the difference with the body area system is significant: p < 0.05, McNemar's test). Our histology findings confirm previous publications indicating that, while some borderline-tuberculoid (BT) patients may outwardly have a 'PB appearance' and be skin-smear negative, their nerve biopsy and sometimes skin biopsy may show a 'MB' picture. This is the first publication discussing a 'body area system' for the purpose described, including diagrams of the areas used. In Nepal it has proved easy to use and teach and its use may be justified in other control programmes which implement MDT, particularly if slit-skin smear services are unreliable or nonexistent.

Evaluation of sensibility in leprosy--comparison of various clinical methods.

In order to determine whether various sensibility tests, not in common use at our hospital, are appropriate for the neurological screening of leprosy patients, an extended nerve function assessment (NFA) was done on 50 in- and outpatients who had been diagnosed as suffering from leprosy (100 hands and feet). The nerve function assessment battery consisted of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing (SWMT), moving 2-point discrimination (M2PD). Pinprick (PP), position sense (PS), vibration sense (VS) and voluntary muscle testing (VMT). In addition the SWMT was performed on 637 hands and 634 feet of field patients' in order to get a better indication of the prevalence of sensory impairment as measured with the SWMT. The SWMT has been shown to be a sensitive test of peripheral nerve function, therefore the other tests were compared with the SWMT. Results are reported separately for the ulnar, median and posterior tibial nerve. Test sites were the pulp of the distal phalanx of the index finger, the little finger and the big toe. Correlation between the SWMT and each of the other tests proved statistically significant; the closest correlations were between the SWMT, M2PD and PP for both ulnar and median nerves (r > 0.7, F test > 100, p < 0.0001). It is argued that the first tests to show nerve function impairment (NFI) are the M2PD and the SWMT. VS and PS were also absent in a significant proportion of patients. Arguments are presented that this may indicate advanced NFI. Results are compared with other data currently available in the literature.

Grading impairment in leprosy.

The aim of the paper is to discuss the concept of 'severity grading' in relation to impairment in leprosy, and to describe the use of an impairment sum score, the Eyes, Hands, Feet (EHF) score, as an indicator of the severity and the evolution of impairment over time. The use of an impairment sum score, the EHF score, is illustrated using data on impairment at diagnosis and after a 2-year interval from MB patients released from MDT in the Western Region of Nepal. The WHO 1988 'disability' grading scale (0-2, for both eyes, hands and feet--six sites) was used as a measure of impairment. For the analysis, the WHO grades for the six sites were summed to form an EHF score (minimum 0, maximum 12). The sensitivity to change over time of the EHF score was compared with that of the 'method of maximum grades'. Using the 'method of maximum grades', 509/706 patients (72%) appeared not to have changed in impairment status, compared with only 399 (56.5%) with the EHF score. Improvement or deterioration of impairment status was missed in 113 patients (16%). In 216/706 patients (30.6%), the changes detected with the EHF score were bigger than those revealed by the method of maximum grades. The six components of the WHO impairment grading may be added up to form a EHF sum score of impairment. This score can be used to monitor changes in impairment status in individuals or in groups. It should be recorded and reported at least at diagnosis and release from treatment. Reporting could be done as the 'proportion of patients with improved EHF score', 'stable EHF score' and 'EHF score worse', and 'proportion of patients without impairment', 'proportion with WHO grade 1' and 'proportion with WHO grade 2'. It is recommended that the concepts and terminology of the WHO International Classification of Impairments, Activities and Participation (ICIDH-2) be adopted in the field of leprosy, particularly for the areas of prevention of impairment and disability and rehabilitation. The 'WHO disability grade' should be renamed 'WHO impairment grade'.

Reactions in leprosy: an epidemiological study of 386 patients in west Nepal.

This paper presents epidemiological data on reversal reaction (RR) and erythema nodosum leprosum reaction (ENL) from a retrospective study of 386 leprosy patients newly registered at Green Pastures Hospital, Pokhara, West Nepal. The average follow-up time was 21 months. The prevalence of RR at first examination was 28% (23-32), and the prevalence of ENL reaction was 5.7% (2.3-9.2). The overall incidence rates among the 335 patients that were available for follow-up were 8.7 (6.5-12)/100 person years at risk (PYAR) for RR and 3.2 (1.5-6.7)/100 PYAR for ENL. Relapse of RR was common (1.4/patient). In all, 52% of RR were complicated by new nerve function impairment, against 59% of ENL reactions. The finding of other investigators that most RRs occur during the first year of treatment was confirmed by this study. The most significant risk factor for RR was extent of clinical disease measured by a count of body areas with clinical signs of leprosy. The risk of developing a RR for patients with 'extensive disease' (3 or more out of 9 body areas involved) was 10 times that of patients with limited disease (Rate Ratio 10 (1.3-76), p = 0.026). The study indicated that the following categories of patients in Nepal are at high or increased risk of developing a RR: 1, borderline patients during their first year of MDT; and 2, patients with more extensive clinical disease as described above.

Reference values for touch sensibility thresholds in healthy Nepalese volunteers.

A hundred and thirty-six apparently healthy volunteers between the ages of 16 and 67 were used to determine normative thresholds of tactile sensibility in the Nepali adult population. Tactile sensibility thresholds on standardized sites on hands and feet were assessed for two sensory tests: Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) and moving-point discrimination (M2PD). Results are reported as the proportion of subjects able to feel a given threshold. The effect of age, sex, side, occupation, smoking habit and alcohol consumption on the results was examined with quantile regression. On the hand 200 mg seemed an appropriate threshold for 'normal' touch sensibility measured with monofilaments. About 99% (95% confidence interval 97-100) of individuals could detect this filament at all sites. A similar proportion could discriminate two points 4 mm apart which were moved from proximal to distal on the volar pad of the distal phalanx of the index and little finger. For the sole of the foot the thresholds were 2 g and 8 mm. Variability of results was greatest at the heel. Normal thresholds for tactile sensibility were higher than those published for the North American population. Monofilament thresholds suitable for screening were 200 mg (log number 3 center dot 61) and 2 g (log number 4 center dot 31) for hand and foot, respectively. For moving 2-point discrimination on the hand this threshold was 4 mm.

Vasomotor reflex testing in leprosy patients, healthy contacts and controls: a cross-sectional study in western Nepal.

OBJECTIVE: To examine test characteristics of laser Doppler vasomotor reflex testing for leprosy and to determine the prevalence of abnormal responses in leprosy patients, healthy contacts and controls. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study including 89 leprosy patients (mean age 35 years, 74% male), 36 healthy contacts (29 years, 64% male) and 47 controls (30 years, 68% male), for a total of 172 participants. SETTING: Leprosy hospital in an endemic region 200 km west of Kathmandu, Nepal. OUTCOME MEASURE: Finger-tip and toe-tip vasomotor reflexes elicited by inspiratory gasp were measured using a laser-doppler flow temperature technique. Results were expressed in per cent as the maximal reduction in bloodflow from baseline. RESULTS: For all 12 measurement sites there were highly significant (p > 0.0001 to < 0.004) differences between the three groups tested. Leprosy patients consistently had the lowest responses and controls the highest, with healthy contacts showing intermediate values. Thresholds defined as mean bloodflow reductions among controls minus 1.64 or minus 1.96 standard deviations provided optimal combinations of sensitivity and specificity. Using these cut-off values around 80% of leprosy patients, 50% of healthy contacts and 20% of controls had two or more abnormal reflexes (p < 0.0001 for differences between groups). CONCLUSIONS: In endemic regions, subclinical autonomic neuropathy may be an early but detectable marker for the risk of subsequent leprosy, making early treatment and prevention of transmission possible. Prospective studies are needed to establish the predictive value of abnormal vasomotor reflexes.

Intertester reliability of manual muscle strength testing in leprosy patients.

This study reports the results of a study on the intertester reliability of manual muscle strength testing in leprosy patients with confirmed motor function loss of at least one nerve. Three testers graded the muscle strength of 72 patients in random order. Both hands and feet were graded. Strength was graded on a modified Medical Research Council Scale (9 points, 5, 4+, 4, 3+, 3, 2+, 2, 1, 0). The following movements were tested for strength: little finger and index finger abduction, intrinsic position of all four fingers, thumb abduction and opposition, foot dorsiflexion and eversion and extension of the big toe. The weighted kappa statistic was used to calculate the chance-corrected percentage of agreement between observers. Overall agreement for each of the 11 tests appeared to be good or very good (0.61-1.00). However, when data for hands or feet with normal strength or complete paralysis were excluded from the analysis, the reliability of the remaining mid-range scale was not acceptable (kappa 0.55-0.88, direct agreement range 11-41%). While the reliability of this scale could possibly be improved by special training, we feel that, for the evaluation of nerve function for leprosy patients with (suspected) nerve function loss, the extended 9-point VMT scale should only be used when direct intra- or intertester agreement is more than 80%.

Functional sensibility of the hand in leprosy patients.

The aims of this cross-sectional comparative study was to compare the results of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing (SWM) and moving 2-point discrimination (M2PD) with four tests of functional sensibility: recognition of objects, discrimination of size and texture and detection of dots. Ninety-eight leprosy in- and outpatients at Green Pastures Hospital in Pokhara, Nepal were tested with each of the above tests and the results were compared to see how well they agreed. Using the tests of functional sensibility as reference points, we examined the validity of the SWM and M2PD as predictors of functional sensibility. There was definite, but only moderate correlation between thresholds of monofilaments and M2PD and functional sensibility of the hand. A normal result with the SWM and/or M2PD had a good predictive value for normal functional sensibility. Sensitivity was reasonable against recognition of objects and discrimination of textures as reference tests (80-90% and 88-93%), but poor against discrimination of size and detection of dots (50-75% and 43-65%). Specificity was high for most combinations of SWM or M2PD with any of the tests of functional sensibility (85-99%). Above a monofilament threshold of 2 g, the predictive value of an abnormal test was 100% for dot detection and 83-92% for textural discrimination. This indicates that impairment of touch sensibility at this level correlates well with loss of dot detection and textural discrimination in patients with leprous neuropathy. For M2PD the pattern was very similar. Above a threshold of 5 mm, 95-100% of affected hands had loss of dot detection and 73-80% had loss of textural discrimination. Monofilament testing and M2PD did not seem suitable as proxy measures of functional sensibility of the hand in leprosy patients. However, a normal threshold with monofilaments and/or M2PD had a good predictive value for normal functional sensibility. Above a monofilament threshold of 2 g and/or a M2PD threshold of 5 mm, textural discrimination was abnormal in most hands.