Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 49(7): e164-e175, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267462

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Decreasing MRI scan time is a key factor to increase patient comfort and compliance as well as the productivity of MRI scanners. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Compressed sensing (CS) should significantly accelerate 3D scans. This study evaluated the clinical application and cost effectiveness of accelerated 3D T2 sequences of the lumbar spine. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational. POPULATION: Twenty healthy volunteers and 10 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3D T2 TSE sequence, identical 3D sequences with three different parallel imaging and CS accelerating factors, and 2D TSE sequences as a clinical reference were obtained on a 3T scanner. ASSESSMENT: Three readers evaluated the sequences for delineation of anatomical structures and image quality. A quantitative analysis consisting of root mean square error, structural similarity index, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were performed. The scan times were used to calculate cost differences for each sequence. STATISTICAL TESTS: An analysis of variance with repeated measurements and the Friedman test were used to test for potential differences between the sequences. Post-hoc analysis was made with the chi-squared and Tukey-Kramer test. RESULTS: CS with factor 4.5 results in unchanged image quality compared to the T2 TSE for volunteers and patients (overall image impression: 4.75 vs. 4.20 [P = 0.73] and 4.90 vs. 4.47 [P = 0.44]). The CS 4.5 scan is 167 seconds (-39%) faster than the 3D and 216.5 seconds (-45%) faster than the 2D sequences. No significant differences was found for the diagnostic certainty in the volunteers and patients between 2D TSE and 3D CS 4.5 (P = 0.89 and P = 0.43). A reduction of scan time to 148 seconds (CS 8) was still rated acceptable for most diagnosis. DATA CONCLUSION: CS accelerates the 3D T2 without compromising image quality. The 3D sequences offer comparable diagnostic quality to the clinical 2D standard with less scan time (-45%), potentially increasing the productivity of MRI scanners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e164-e175.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Adulto , Idoso , Artefatos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento (Física) , Estudos Prospectivos , Razão Sinal-Ruído , Adulto Jovem
2.
World Neurosurg ; 181: e18-e28, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791880

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the feasibility of using compressed sensing accelerated, low-velocity encoded, isotropic resolution phase contrast (CLIP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for avascular trajectory planning of stereoelectroencephalography. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects (1 woman and 9 men; age, 33.6 ± 9.0 years) and 20 consecutive patients (12 female patients; age, 22 ± 13.6 years) were enrolled in the present study. The healthy subjects underwent CLIP-MRA, and 3 other phase contrast MRA protocols with conventional parallel imaging (PI) acceleration, including low resolution with twofold PI (PI2), high resolution (HR) with fivefold PI (PI5), and HR-PI2. The patients underwent CLIP-MRA and computed tomography angiography (CTA). The image qualities were evaluated. The numbers and locations of trajectory-vessel conflict detected using CLIP-MRA were noted. RESULTS: With similar scan durations, CLIP-MRA achieved higher spatial resolution compared with low resolution with PI2 and detected significantly more branches compared with HR-PI5. With the same spatial resolution, the signal/noise and contrast/noise ratios of CLIP-MRA were higher than those with HR-PI2 with a shorter scan duration. For the 12 adult patients (10 female patients; 28.8 ± 12.7 years), CLIP-MRA had better signal/noise and contrast/noise ratios than CTA. The trajectory had required modification for 14 of the 20 patients (70%), with a proportion of trajectory modification of 10.7% (23 of 215 electrodes). The middle meningeal artery, cortical vessel, and skull vessel were the main vessels with conflict (n = 11, n = 7, and n = 5, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, CLIP-MRA provided a clear cortical vascular display noninvasively without intravascular contrast and radiation. The middle meningeal artery and diploic and emissary veins were the main conflict vessels and could be clearly displayed using CLIP-MRA but not CTA.


Assuntos
Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Adolescente , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Meios de Contraste
3.
Eur J Radiol ; 132: 109273, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957000

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate potential clinical acceleration factors of Compressed SENSE (CS)1 in direct comparison with SENSE for fat saturated (fs)2, proton density-weighted (PD)3 2D and 3D sequences of the knee. METHOD: Twenty healthy volunteers were scanned with a 3 T scanner, all receiving a standard, fs 2D PD, three CS (CS 2, CS 3, CS 5) as well as time-equivalent SENSE accelerations (S 2, S 3, S 5). The fs 3D PD sequence was acquired with four CS (CS 6, CS 8, CS 10, CS 15) and equivalent SENSE (S 5.72, S 7.69, S 9.57, S 14) factors. Three independent readers rated the images. Signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, root-mean-square error and structural similarity index were analyzed for objective evaluation. RESULTS: Scan time decreased with increasing CS factor (2D CS 2: 145 s, 2D CS 3: 95 s, 2D CS 5: 57 s, 3D CS 6: 293 s, 3D CS 8: 220 s, 3D CS 10: 176 s, 3D CS 15: 119 s). The 2D standard sequence was rated best for diagnostic certainty and overall image impression with an average of 4.97 ±â€¯0.10 and 4.80 ±â€¯0.24 (all p < 0.05), except for 2D CS 2 and 2D S 2. For the 3D sequences, the standard sequence performed better for both parameters for CS 15, S 9.57 and S 4, as well as S 7.69 for overall image impression while CS 8 was non-inferior for all tested criteria and CS 10 only inferior for delineation of the anterior cruciate ligament, both outperforming the time-equivalent SENSE accelerations. CONCLUSION: Compressed SENSE can significantly decrease (34.39 % for 2D CS 2 and 54.17 % for 3D CS 10) scan time in knee imaging with unchanged diagnostic certainty and overall image impression compared to the clinical reference.


Assuntos
Imageamento Tridimensional , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Pressão , Prótons
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA