Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37407719

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of sequential examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to determine pelvic instability and to evaluate radiological and functional outcomes in unstable lateral compression (LC) injuries. METHODS: A prospective case series study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 at a university hospital on 43 cases with LC injuries that met the inclusion criteria. Sequential EUA was carried out in three steps. Posterior-only fixation or anterior-posterior fixation was done according to the algorithm. Each patient was followed up for at least 12 months, both radiologically and functionally. RESULTS: Forty cases proved unstable and were fixed. None showed secondary displacement in the anterior-posterior fixation group. However, five cases (19.2%) of the posterior-only fixation group showed secondary displacement with a mean of 5.9 mm. Four cases of them had tetra-ramic injuries. There is a high tendency for secondary displacement at 14.5 mm or more preoperative displacement of the rami. Patients with secondary displacement showed comparable functional outcome scores to patients without secondary displacement. Posterior-only fixation showed shorter operative time, lesser radiological exposure, blood loss and iatrogenic nerve injury than anterior-posterior fixation. CONCLUSION: EUA is a reliable method to determine pelvic instability and management plan for LC fractures with unilateral anterior ring injury. Anterior-posterior fixation is needed if there is a tetra-ramic fracture or initial anterior ring displacement of 14.5 mm or more, irrespective of EUA.

2.
Eur Spine J ; 31(9): 2212-2219, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35122503

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine complications, readmission, and revision surgery rates in patients undergoing single position surgery (SPS) for surgical treatment of traumatic and pathologic thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: A multi-center review of patients who underwent SPS in the lateral decubitus position (LSPS) for surgical management of traumatic or pathologic thoracolumbar fractures between January 2016 and May 2020 was conducted. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, readmissions, and revision surgeries were collected. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with a mean age of 45 years (66.67% male) were included. The majority of patients underwent operative treatment for acute thoracolumbar trauma (66.67%) with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 16.71. Mean operative time was 175.5 min, mean EBL of 816.67 cc. Five patients experienced a complication, two of which required revision surgery for additional decompression during the initial admission. All ambulatory patients were mobilized on postoperative day 1. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 9.67 days. CONCLUSION: The results of this case series supports LSPS as a feasible alternative to the traditional combined anterior-posterior approach for surgical treatment of pathologic and thoracolumbar fractures. These results are similar to reductions in operative time, EBL, and LOS seen in the elective spine literature with LSPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Assuntos
Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Technol Health Care ; 2024 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39453647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of posterior malleolus fractures in ankle fractures ranges from 7% to 44%. Studies have indicated a poorer prognosis for ankle joint function when a posterior malleolar fracture is present, underscoring the significance of active intervention for optimal postoperative ankle function recovery. Hence, the selection of treatment for such fractures holds particular importance. OBJECTIVE: Screw fixation is a key treatment for posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) or Haraguchi Type 1 fractures involving less than 25% of the distal tibia's articular surface. However, the optimal screw placement direction - anteroposterior (AP) or posterior-anterior (PA) - remains debated. This meta-analysis aims to compare these two approaches for treating posterior ankle fractures, focusing on the efficacy of PA fixation. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, SinoMed, and Web of Science databases from their inception to October 20, 2022. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing bias risk in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Stata MP17 software was used to compare the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, full weight-bearing time, and fracture healing time at the last follow-up between the two fixation methods. RESULTS: A total of 403 patients with posterior malleolar fractures from six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher AOFAS score at the last follow-up for PA placement compared to AP placement [SMD = 0.512, 95% CI (0.244 to 0.780), z= 3.74, P< 0.001]. Postoperative full weight-bearing time and fracture healing time did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: PA fixation demonstrated a superior AOFAS score compared to AP fixation for posterior malleolar fractures. PA screw placement offers advantages in restoring ankle joint stability and enhancing joint function recovery post-surgery.

4.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 101: 105864, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563544

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The main purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different fixation methods (anterior fixation, self-stabilizing fixation and anterior-posterior fixation) on biomechanical property of vertebral body replacement and fusion. METHODS: Three finite element models of cervical vertebral body replacement and fusion were established. The implanted models included artificial vertebral body and fixation system, and the loads imposed on the models included 75 N compression load and 1 Nm moment load. FINDINGS: For anterior-posterior fixation, the cervical load was mainly transmitted by the posterior pedicle screw and rod (more than 50%), and the stress shielding problem was the most significant than the self-stabilizing and anterior fixation. Self-stabilizing fixation was more helpful to the fusion of implant and vertebrae, but the higher risk of vertebral body collapse was worthy of attention if the cervical spine with osteoporosis. The stress of bone was mainly concentrated around the screw hole. The maximum stress (20.03 MPa) was lower than the yield stress of cortical bone and the possibility of fracture around the fixation device of cervical spine was low. The anterior fixation could meet the requirement of vertebral body replacement and fusion, and the addition of posterior pedicle screws and rods might obtain better treatment in cases of severe spine injury or osteoporosis. INTERPRETATION: The findings of this study may provide guidance on clinical treatments for choosing more appropriate fixation methods for different patients.


Assuntos
Osteoporose , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Corpo Vertebral , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Pescoço , Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Análise de Elementos Finitos
5.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 11(2): 86-89, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34141678

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Better understanding of disruption of bony and ligamentous constraints of the radiocapitellar joint in complex capitellum fracture is essential for optimizing the surgical care and outcome. This report highlights the need for modification in surgical fixation technique to address an unusual variant of this rare injury. CASE REPORT: We report a three-part capitellum fracture pattern with a Y-shaped split of distal humerus with a sheared anterior fragment and a single, large, non-articular posterolateral fragment in a young male patient. Articular fragment was fixed with two countersunk anterior-distal to posterior-proximal oblique screws. Additional screw was used to fix the posterolateral fragment to prevent posterolateral rotational instability. Mayo elbow performance score was 95 with no rotational instability at 2 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Additional fixation of posterolateral fragment in this three-part variant of Bryan and Morrey Type IV capitellum fracture ensured rotational stability and good function.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA