Emergency department management of atrial fibrillation: 2023 consensus from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH). / Manejo de la fibrilación auricular en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: actualización a 2023 del consenso de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias (SEMES), la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (SEC) y la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH).

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia managed in emergency departments, and the already high prevalence of this arrhythmia is increasing in Spain. This serious condition associated with increased mortality and morbidity has a negative impact on patient quality of life and the functioning of the health care system. The management of AF requires consideration of diverse clinical variables and a large number of possible therapeutic approaches, justifying action plans to coordinate the work of several medical specialties in the interest of providing appropriate care and optimizing resources. This consensus statement brings together recommendations for emergency department management of AF based on available evidence adapted to special circumstances. The statement was drafted by a multidisciplinary team of specialists from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH). Strategies for stroke prophylaxis, measures to bring heart rate and heart rhythm under control, and related diagnostic and logistic issues are discussed in detail.

OBJETIVO: La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia sostenida de mayor prevalencia en los servicios de urgencias (SU), y en España presenta una frecuentación elevada y creciente. Esta arritmia es una enfermedad grave, que incrementa la mortalidad y asocia una relevante morbilidad e impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes y en el funcionamiento de los servicios sanitarios. La diversidad de aspectos clínicos a considerar y el elevado número de opciones terapéuticas posibles justifican la implementación de estrategias de actuación coordinadas entre los diversos profesionales implicados, con el fin de incrementar la adecuación del tratamiento y optimizar el uso de recursos. Este documento, realizado por un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos en arritmias cardiacas miembros de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias, la Sociedad Española de Cardiología y la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia, recoge las recomendaciones para el manejo de la FA en los SU hospitalarios, basadas en la evidencia disponible y adaptadas a las especiales circunstancias de los mismos. En él se analizan con detalle las estrategias de profilaxis tromboembólica, control de frecuencia y control del ritmo, y los aspectos logísticos y diagnósticos relacionados.

Emergency department prescription of sinus rhythm maintenance therapy for patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a secondary analysis of the HERMES-AF study / Análisis del tratamiento para mantener el ritmo sinusal en pacientes con fibrilación auricular prescrito en los servicios de urgencias: subanálisis del estudio HERMES-AF

OBJECTIVES: The maintenance of sinus rhythm by means of antiarrhythmic drugs and/or upstream therapy to counter cardiac remodeling is fundamental to the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to analyze this approach and its appropriateness in the setting of hospital emergency departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the multicenter observational cross-sectional HERMES-AF study carried out in 124 hospitals representative of the Spanish national health service in 2011. Included were consecutive patients with AF restored to sinus rhythm who were discharged home from emergency care. RESULTS: A total of 449 patients were included; 204 (45.4%) were already on sinus rhythm maintenance therapy. Of ,the 245 remaining patients, 107 (43.67%) were prescribed maintenance treatment in the emergency department, as follows: 41, an antiarrhythmic drug; 19, upstream therapy; and 49, both treatments. The selection of an antiarrhythmic drug did not follow guideline recommendations in 10 patients (11.8%). Antiarrhythmic drug prescription was associated with having had a prior episode of AF (odds ratio [OR], 2.024; 95% CI, 1.196-3.424; P = .009); a heart rate of more than 110 beats/min (OR, 2.147; 95% CI, 1.034-4.456, P = 0.40); and prescription of anticoagulation on discharge (OR, 1.862; 95% CI, 1.094-3.170; P = .022). Upstream therapy prescription was associated only with a heart rate over 110 beats/min (OR, 2.187; 95% CI, 1.005-4.757; P = .018). In total, 311 patients (69.23%) were discharged from the emergency department with sinus rhythm maintenance therapy: 87 with an antiarrhythmic drug, 117 with an upstream therapy, and 107 with both. CONCLUSION: Treatment to prevent the recurrence of AF is underprescribed in emergency departments. Increasing such prescription and ensuring the appropriateness of antiarrhythmic therapy prescribed are points emergency departments can improve in the interest of better sinus rhythm maintenance.

OBJETIVO: El mantenimiento del ritmo sinusal (RS) con fármacos antiarrítmicos (FAA) y/o tratamiento del remodelado (TRM) es parte fundamental en la estrategia de control del ritmo en la fibrilación auricular (FA). Este estudio analiza estas estrategias y su adecuación en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). METODO: Análisis secundario del estudio multicéntrico observacional transversal HERMES-AF, desarrollado en 124 SUH representativos del sistema sanitario español en 2011. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos con FA que revirtieron a RS y fueron dados de alta desde urgencias. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 449 pacientes: 204 (45,4%) ya realizaban tratamiento para mantenimiento del RS. De los 245 restantes se prescribió tratamiento en el SUH a 107 (43,7%): 41 con FAA, 19 TRM y en 47 ambas terapias. En 10 casos (11,8%) la selección del FAA no era acorde a las recomendaciones de las guías. La prescripción de FAA se asoció a FA previa [odds ratio (OR) 2,024, IC 95%: 1,196-3,424, p = 0,009], frecuencia cardiaca > 110 lpm (OR 2,147, IC 95%: 1,034-4,456, p = 0,040) y anticoagulación al alta (OR 1,862, IC 95%: 1,094-3,170, p = 0,022). El TRM se asoció a frecuencia cardiaca > 110 lpm (OR 2,187, IC 95%: 1,005-4,757, p = 0,018). En total, al alta del SUH 311 pacientes (69,2%) recibían tratamiento para mantenimiento del RS (87 con FAA, 117 con TRM y 107 con ambas terapias). CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción de tratamiento para evitar las recurrencias de la FA es insuficiente en los SUH. Extender esta prescripción y mejorar la adecuación del tratamiento antiarrítmico son áreas de mejora de la estrategia de control del ritmo en los SUH.

Dramatic reduction of ventricular tachycardia burden after dronedarone plus mexiletine treatment in a patient refractory to hybrid ablation.

Antiarrhythmic drugs are often the last resort for recurrent ventricular tachycardia refractory to catheter ablation in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator carriers. Amiodarone, alone or combined with mexiletine, is usually but not always highly effective, and its use is usually limited by systemic adverse effects. We present the case of a 62 years old man with recurrent ICD shocks due to a VT refractory to an endo-epicardial hybrid ablation. Starting of dronedarone plus mexiletine combination showed an excellent result.

Atrioventricular block in patients undergoing treatment with bradycardic drugs. Predictors of pacemaker requirement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular block (AVB) in the presence of bradycardic drugs (BD) can be reversible, and pacemaker implantation is controversial. Our objective was to analyze the pacemaker implantation rate in the mid-term, after BD suspension, and to identify predictive factors. METHODS: We performed a cohort study that included patients attending the emergency department with high-grade AVB in the context of BD. We studied the persistence of AVB after BD discontinuation, recurrence in patients with AVB resolution, and the predictive variables associated with pacemaker requirement at 3 years. RESULTS: Of 127 patients included (age, 79 [71-83] years), BAV resolved in 60 (47.2%); among these patients, recurrence occurred during the 24-month median follow-up in 40 (66.6%). Pacemaker implantation was required in 107 patients (84.3%), despite BD discontinuation. On multivariable analysis, the variables associated with pacemaker need at 3 years were heart rate <35 bpm (OR, 8.12; 95%CI, 1.82-36.17), symptoms other than syncope (OR, 4.09; 95%CI, 1.18-14.13), and wide QRS (OR, 5.65; 95%CI, 1.77-18.04). Concomitant antiarrhythmic treatment was associated with AVB resolution (OR, 0.12; 95%CI, 0.02-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of patients with AVB secondary to BD require pacemaker implantation despite drug discontinuation. Predictive variables were wide QRS, heart rate <35 bpm, and clinical presentation other than syncope.

Cardioversion in recent onset atrial fibrillation. / Cardioversión en la fibrilación auricular de reciente comienzo.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze heart rate control in hospital emergency departments and outcomes in patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation (AF) so that targets for improvement can be identified. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, prospective observational cross-sectional study in a representative sample of 124 hospitals of the Spanish health services, based on records in the HERMES-AF database (Hospital Emergency Department Management Strategies for AF) for May 23 to June 5, 2011. Patients with symptomatic AF within 48 hours of onset were enrolled when the decision was made to attempt restoration of sinus rhythm. RESULTS: We included 337 patients. Chemical cardioversion was used in 311 (92.3%) and electrical cardioversion in 52 (15%), after drugs had failed in half the cases. Sinus rhythm was restored in 278 patients (82.5%), and symptoms resolved in 94%. Adverse effects were recorded in 0.9% but none were serious. Amiodarone was independently associated with a lower rate of restored sinus rhythm (odds ratio [OR], 0.442; 95% CI, 0.238-0.823; P=.01) than electrical cardioversion (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.2-13.3; P=.024). The use of class Ic antiarrhythmic agents was associated with a higher percentage of discharges in less than 6 hours (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.3; P< .001), and amiodarone was associated with hospital stays longer than 24 hours (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P< .003). CONCLUSION: Emergency department restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AF is safe, effective, and associated with clinical benefits. Quality of care could be improved by replacing the use of amiodarone with faster and more effective treatments such as electrical cardioversion or the use of class Ic agents.

OBJETIVO: Este estudio analiza el control del ritmo en los servicios de urgencias (SUH) y sus resultados en pacientes con fibrilación auricular (FA) de reciente comienzo, para identificar áreas de mejora en el manejo. METODO: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, prospectivo y transversal desarrollado en 124 SUH representativos del sistema sanitario español basado en el registro HERMES-AF (estrategias de manejo en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario de la FA) del 23 de mayo al 5 de junio de 2011. Se incluyeron pacientes con FA sintomática con menos de 48 h de evolución en los cuales se tomó la decisión de restaurar el ritmo sinusal. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 337 pacientes, se optó por cardioversión farmacológica en 311 pacientes (92,3%), y por cardioversión eléctrica en 52 (15%), la mitad de los casos tras fracaso de los fármacos. Se obtuvo ritmo sinusal (RS) en 278 pacientes (82,5%) y el alivio de los síntomas en 297 (94%), con una tasa de efectos adversos del 0,9%, ninguno grave. Amiodarona se asoció de manera independiente a una menor tasa de RS al alta (OR = 0,442; IC 95% 0,238-0,823; p = 0,01), al contrario que la cardioversión eléctrica (OR = 4,0; IC 95% 1,2-13,3; p = 0,024). Los fármacos I-C se asociaron con una mayor proporción de altas en < 6 h (OR 2,6; IC 95% 1,6-4,3; p < 0,001) y amiodarona con más estancias prolongadas de > 24 h (OR 2,7, IC 95% 1,5-4,8; p < 0,003). CONCLUSIONES: En los SUH, la restauración del RS en la FA de reciente comienzo es segura, efectiva y asocia beneficios clínicos para los pacientes. Reemplazar amiodarona por técnicas más efectivas y rápidas como la cardioversión eléctrica o los fármacos I-C es un área de mejora de la calidad asistencial.

Estudo Randomizado Comparando a Ablação por Cateter com o PVAC Gold vs. Tratamento com Fármacos Antiarrítmicos em Pacientes Idosos com Fibrilação Atrial Sintomática / Randomized Study Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation with the PVAC Gold System vs. Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation

Resumo Fundamento Não existem estudos randomizados comparando a manutenção do ritmo sinusal após ablação por cateter (AC) em relação ao tratamento com fármacos antiarrítmicos (AA) em pacientes idosos portadores fibrilação atrial (FA) paroxística. Objetivos Comparar os resultados clínicos do isolamento das veias pulmonares (VPs) com o cateter PVAC Gold de segunda geração com o uso de AA em idosos com FA paroxística sintomática, recorrente, apesar do uso de fármacos AA. Métodos Sessenta pacientes com FA paroxística ≥ 65 anos e sem cardiopatias estruturais foram randomizados para duas formas de tratamento: grupo 1: AC e grupo 2: AA. O desfecho primário foi a taxa livre de recorrência de FA após pelo menos um ano de seguimento. Os desfechos secundários foram: progressão para formas persistentes de FA, impacto na qualidade de vida (QVFA) e complicações. O nível de significância adotado na análise estatística foi de 5% (p<0,05). Resultados A taxa livre de recorrência de FA foi de 80% (10% com amiodarona) no grupo AC, após 1,3 procedimentos por paciente e de 65% no grupo AA (60% com amiodarona), (p = 0,119) num seguimento médio de 719 dias (Q1: 566; Q3: 730). A taxa livre de FA persistente foi de 83,4% no grupo AC e de 67,7% no grupo AA (p = 0,073). Ambas as estratégias apresentaram melhora no escore de QVFA durante o seguimento (p < 0,001), sem diferença entre os grupos. Embora sem repercussão clínica ou impacto no teste de avaliação intelectual, 25% dos pacientes do grupo PVAC apresentou sinais de embolização cerebral na RNM cerebral. Conclusões Ambas as estratégias para manutenção do ritmo sinusal promoveram melhora na qualidade de vida de pacientes idosos com FA sintomática, sem diferença estatística nos desfechos clínicos preconizados. Estudos adicionais usando tecnologias com melhor perfil de segurança são necessários para avaliar os benefícios da AC em pacientes idosos com FA.

Abstract Background There are no randomized studies comparing the maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation (CA) concerning treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AA) in elderly patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Objectives To compare the clinical results of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with the second-generation PVAC Gold catheter against AA treatment in elderly people with recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF, refractory to at least one AA, and without structural heart disease. Methods Sixty patients with paroxysmal AF ≥ 65 years old were randomized to two forms of treatment: group 1: CA and group 2: AA drugs. The primary outcome was the AF recurrence-free rate after at least one year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were: progression to persistent forms of AF, impact on quality of life (QOLF), and complications. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5% (p<0.05). Results The AF recurrence-free rate was 80% (10% with amiodarone) in the CA group, after 1.3 procedures per patient and 65% in the AA group (60% with amiodarone), (p = 0.119) in an average follow-up of 719 days (Q1: 566; Q3: 730). The persistent AF free rate was 83.4% in the AC group and 67.7% in the AA group (p = 0.073) Both strategies showed an improvement in the AFQoL score during follow-up (p < 0.001), with no difference between the groups. Although without clinical repercussions or impact on the intellectual assessment test, 25% of patients in the CA group showed signs of cerebral embolization on brain MRI. Conclusions Both strategies for maintaining sinus rhythm promoted an improvement in the quality of life of elderly patients with symptomatic AF, with no statistical difference in the clinical outcomes. Additional studies using technologies with a better safety profile are needed to evaluate the benefits of CA in elderly patients with AF.

[Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dronedarone and flecainide as maintenance antiarrhythmic therapy for sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation]. / Comparación de la eficacia y seguridad de flecainida y dronedarona como terapias antiarrítmicas para mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal en fibrilación auricular.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Dronedarone and flecainide are the first pharmacological choice to reduce recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there are no studies comparing them. A study was performed to compare the efficacy in terms of recurrence of AF and safety of both drugs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included 123 consecutive patients treated with flecainide or dronedarone due to paroxysmal AF (76.4%) or persistent AF (23.6%), from October 2010 to February 2013. Electrical cardioversion was performed in 7.3% of patients and pharmacological cardioversion in 16.3%. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 301days (92-474) with a mean of 2.8 reviews per patient. Time to first event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, adjusted for propensity score. RESULTS: Of the 123 consecutive patients with AF included, 71 were on dronedarone and 52 on flecainide. During the follow-up, there were 36 AF recurrences and 20 safety events. There were recurrences in 36.6% of patients treated with flecainide, compared with 21% of those receiving dronedarone (P=.073). Dronedarone showed to be at least as effective as flecainide in preventing recurrence of atrial fibrillation (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.20-1.44, P=.221), and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with flecainide (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.18-2.53, P=.566). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, dronedarone has been at least as effective and safe as flecainide, despite it was most frequently prescribed in patients with worse baseline risk profile.

Ablação por Cateter é Superior a Drogas Antiarrítmicas como Tratamento de primeira linha para Fibrilação Atrial: uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise / Catheter Ablation is Superior to Antiarrhythmic Drugs as First-Line Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Resumo Fundamento A ablação por cateter é uma terapia bem estabelecida para controle do ritmo cardíaco em pacientes refratários ou intolerantes a drogas antiarrítmicas (DAA). Porém, a eficácia desse procedimento comparada à de DAA como estratégia de primeira linha no controle do ritmo cardíaco na fibrilação atrial é menos conhecida. Objetivos Conduzir uma revisão sistemática e metanálise da ablação por cateter vs. DAA em pacientes sem nenhum tratamento prévio para controle do ritmo. Métodos Buscamos, nos bancos de dados do PubMed, EMBASE, e Cochrane, ensaios randomizados controlados que compararam ablação por cateter com DAA para controle do ritmo cardíaco em pacientes com FA sintomática e descreveram os seguintes desfechos: (1) recorrência de taquiarritmia atrial (TA); (2) FA sintomática; (3) internações hospitalares; e (4) bradicardia sintomática. A heterogeneidade foi avaliada por estatística I2. Valores de p menores que 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados Incluímos cinco ensaios com 994 pacientes, dos quais 502 (50,5%) foram submetidos à ablação por cateter. O período médio de acompanhamento foi de um a cinco anos. Recorrências de TA (OR 0,36; IC95% 0,25-0,52; p<0,001) e de FA sintomática (OR 0,32; IC95% 0,18-0,57; p<0,001), e internações hospitalares (OR 0,25; IC95% 0,15-0,42; p<0,001) foram menos frequentes nos pacientes tratados com ablação por cateter que naqueles tratados com DAA. Bradicardia sintomática não foi diferente entre os grupos (OR 0,55; IC95% 0,18-1,65; p=0,28). Derrame ou tamponamento pericárdico significativo ocorreu em oito dos 464 (1,7%) pacientes no grupo submetido à ablação. Conclusão Esses achados sugerem maior eficácia da ablação por cateter que das DAA como estratégia inicial de controle do ritmo cardíaco em pacientes com DA sintomática.

Abstract Background Catheter ablation is a well-established therapy for rhythm control in patients who are refractory or intolerant to anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD). Less is known about the efficacy of catheter ablation compared with AAD as a first-line strategy for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). Objectives We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of catheter ablation vs. AAD in patients naïve to prior rhythm control therapies. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared catheter ablation to AAD for initial rhythm control in symptomatic AF and reported the outcomes of (1) recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs); (2) symptomatic AF; (3) hospitalizations; and (4) symptomatic bradycardia. Heterogeneity was examined with I2statistics. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results We included five trials with 994 patients, of whom 502 (50.5%) underwent catheter ablation. Mean follow-up ranged from one to five years. Recurrences of AT (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.25-0.52; p<0.001) and symptomatic AF (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.18-0.57; p<0.001), and hospitalizations (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.15-0.42; p<0.001) were significantly less frequent in patients treated with catheter ablation compared with AAD. Symptomatic bradycardia was not significantly different between groups (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.18-1.65; p=0.28). Significant pericardial effusions or tamponade occurred in eight of 464 (1.7%) patients in the catheter ablation group. Conclusion These findings suggest that catheter ablation has superior efficacy to AAD as an initial rhythm control strategy in patients with symptomatic AF.

Flutter auricular neonatal: presentación de tres casos / Neonatal atrial flutter: Presentation of three cases

Resumen Introducción: El flutter auricular es un tipo poco frecuente de arritmia fetal y neonatal. A pesar de que puede conducir a graves morbilidades, como hidrops fetal o incluso el fallecimiento, el diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz confieren un buen pronóstico a la mayoría de los casos. Pacientes y métodos: Se presentan tres casos de flutter auricular, dos de inicio en periodo fetal y uno en periodo neonatal, y se revisa la literatura en relación con las características clínicas, diagnósticas y terapéuticas del flutter auricular fetal y neonatal. Resultados y discusión: En el flutter auricular fetal la terapia materna con fármacos antiarrítmicos es el tratamiento más empleado durante la gestación. El tratamiento postnatal más utilizado es la cardioversión eléctrica sincronizada. El flutter auricular no suele asociar cardiopatía estructural; la recidiva neonatal es poco habitual y normalmente no precisa la administración de tratamiento profiláctico.

Abstract Introduction: Atrial flutter is a rare type of fetal and neonatal arrhythmia. Although it can lead to serious morbidities such as fetal hydrops or even death, diagnosis and early treatment confer a good prognosis in most cases. Patients and methods: Three cases of atrial flutter are presented, two of which start in the fetal period and one in the neonatal period. The literature is reviewed in relation to the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics of fetal and neonatal atrial flutter. Results and discussion: In fetal atrial flutter maternal therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs is the most used treatment during pregnancy. The most used postnatal treatment is synchronized electrical cardioversion. Atrial flutter does not usually associate structural heart disease, neonatal recurrence is uncommon and usually does not require prophylactic treatment.

Experiencia en el uso de propranolol para el tratamiento de la taquicardia supraventricular en pacientes menores de un año / Experience using propranolol for the management of supraventricular tachycardia in patients younger than 1 year

Objetivo. Evaluar los resultados y efectos adversos de la terapia con propranolol en menores de un año con taquicardia supraventricular. Población y métodos. Menores de 1 año con taquicardia supraventricular documentada, que recibieron tratamiento y prevención con propranolol por vía oral. Se analizaron sexo y edad, cardiopatía congénita asociada, pre excitación ventricular en el electrocardiograma basal, recurrencia intratratamiento y efectos adversos. Resultados. Se identificaron 107 pacientes. El primer episodio de taquicardia supraventricular ocurrió a una edad mediana de 190 días. En 10 pacientes, se observó cardiopatía congénita asociada. El 23,3 % presentó pre excitación ventricular en el electrocardiograma basal. El rango de la dosis de propranolol fue de 2 a 5 mg/kg/día. En el 30,8 %, se observó recurrencia intratratamiento. En 2 pacientes, se suspendió la medicación por efectos adversos graves. Conclusión. El propranolol evitó la recurrencia en el 70 % de los casos. En 2 pacientes, fue necesario suspenderlo por efectos adversos graves

Objective. To assess the results and adverse events of propranolol therapy in infants younger than 1 year with supraventricular tachycardia. Population and methods. Infants younger than 1 year with documented supraventricular tachycardia who received oral treatment and prophylaxis with propranolol. Sex and age, associated congenital heart disease, ventricular preexcitation in the base line electrocardiogram, on-treatment recurrence, and adverse events were analyzed. Results. A total of 107 patients were identified. The first supraventricular tachycardia event occurred at a median age of 190 days. Associated congenital heart disease was observed in 10 patients. Ventricular preexcitation in the baseline electrocardiogram was detected in 23.3 %. Propranolol dose ranged from 2 to 5 mg/kg/day. On-treatment recurrence was observed in 30.8 %. Medication was discontinued in 2 patients due to severe adverse events. Conclusion. Propranolol prevented recurrence in 70 % of cases. It was discontinued in 2 patients due to severe adverse events.

Disincronía ventricular inducida por fármacos y taquicardiomiopatía en un neonate / Drug-induced ventricular dissynchrony and tachycardiomyopathy in a newborn

Resumen La disfunción ventricular secundaria a disincronía eléctrica y mecánica es una complicación de la estimulación ventricular desde el ápex del ventrículo derecho. No existen informes de disincronía secundaria a los efectos de fármacos antiarrítmicos. Se presenta el caso de una niña de 10 días de vida con taquicardia supraventricular incesante que se internó en terapia intensiva neonatal. Se inició tratamiento con propranolol por vía oral y ante la persistencia de la taquicardia se agregó amiodarona endovenosa. La paciente estuvo predominantemente en taquicardia con frecuencias cardíacas entre 200 y 290 latidos por minuto durante una semana a pesar del tratamiento instaurado. La función ventricular fue normal en los ecocardiogramas realizados. Se agregó flecainida por vía oral al esquema de tratamiento y luego de 24 horas presentó una taquicardia más lenta con QRS ancho e imagen de bloqueo completo de rama izquierda. Un nuevo ecocardiograma evidenció deterioro de la función ventricular izquierda e insuficiencia mitral moderada lo que motivó la suspensión de la flecainida y el propranolol. A las 24 horas de la suspensión se observó la normalización de la función ventricular a pesar de la persistencia de episodios intermitentes de taquicardia. Se reinició el propranolol logrando el control de la taquicardia. La presencia de disincronía ventricular generada por el bloqueo de rama izquierda secundario al tratamiento farmacológico con flecainida constituye una novedosa explicación posible para el desarrollo de disfunción ventricular.

Abstract Ventricular dysfunction secondary to electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in chronic right ventricular apical pacing is a well-recognized complication. There are no previous reports of pharmacologically induced dyssynchrony. A 10-day old infant with incessant supraventricular tachycardia was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Therapy with oral propranolol was initiated and due to persistence of tachycardia intravenous amiodarone was administered. The patient remained predominantly in tachycardia with heart rates between 200-290 beats per minute for a week with serial echocardiograms showing preserved ventricular function. Oral flecainide was started. After 24 hours of treatment the patient developed a slower incessant wide QRS with a left bundle branch block pattern. The echocardiogram showed deterioration of left ventricular systolic function and moderate mitral regurgitation. Flecainide and propranolol were discontinued. The QRS complex narrowed and despite intermittent breakthroughs of supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular function normalized. Propranolol was restarted to achieve definitive control of the tachycardia. The presence of ventricular dyssynchrony generated by the left bundle branch block pattern secondary to pharmacological treatment with flecainide is a novel possible explanation for the development of ventricular dysfunction.

Evaluación diagnóstica y manejo terapéutico farmacológico en pacientes con fibrilación auricular / Diagnostic evaluation and pharmacological therapeutic management in patients with atrial fibrillation

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia sostenida más frecuente que puede presentarse en una amplia variedad de condiciones clínicas. A pesar de los progresos en el tratamiento de los pacientes con FA, esta arritmia sigue siendo una de las más importantes causas de accidente cerebrovascular, insuficiencia cardiaca, muerte súbita y morbilidad cardiovascular en todo el mundo. El objetivo del tratamiento con fármacos antiarrítmicos es mejorar los síntomas relacionados con la FA, y buscar un equilibrio entre la carga sintomática, la posibilidad de reacciones farmacológicas adversas y las preferencias del paciente. El control de la frecuencia cardiaca a corto y largo plazo se puede lograr con bloqueadores beta, digoxina, bloqueadores de los canales del calcio o tratamiento combinado. Si bien otros fármacos antiarrítmicos de clase III también tienen un efecto limitador de la frecuencia, solo deben emplearse para el control del ritmo cardiaco. Restaurar y mantener el ritmo sinusal también es una parte integral del tratamiento de la FA. Los fármacos antiarrítmicos de clase III duplican la tasa de pacientes en ritmo sinusal. El tratamiento para el control del ritmo está indicado para mejorar los síntomas de los pacientes con FA que siguen sintomáticos a pesar del tratamiento adecuado para el control de la frecuencia cardiaca. La combinación de antiarrítmicos que prolongan el intervalo QT no se debe emplear para el control del ritmo cardiaco en la FA(AU)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia that can occur in a wide variety of clinical conditions. Despite progress in the treatment of patients with AF, this arrhythmia remains one of the most important causes of stroke, heart failure, sudden death and cardiovascular morbidity worldwide. The aim of treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs is to improve the symptoms related to AF, and to look for a balance between the symptomatic load, the possibility of adverse pharmacological reactions and the patient preferences. The short and long term heart rate control can be achieved with beta blockers, digoxin, calcium channel blockers or combination therapy. Although other class III antiarrhythmic drugs also have a frequency-limiting effect, they should only be used for the control of heart rhythm. Restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm is also an integral part of the treatment of AF. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs double the rate of patients who maintain their sinus rhythm. Treatment for rhythm control is indicated to improve the symptoms of patients with AF who remain symptomatic despite adequate treatment for heart rate control. The combination of antiarrhythmics that prolong the QT interval should not be used to control heart rhythm in AF(AU)

Bradycardic and Antiarrhythmic Effects of the D-Limonene in Rats / Efeitos Bradicárdicos e Antiarrítmicos do D-Limoneno em Ratos

Abstract Background: D-limonene (DL) is a monoterpene and is the major component in the essential oil of citrus fruit. It presents antihyperglycemic and vasodilatation activities. Objectives: This study evaluated the cardiovascular effects and potential antiarrhythmic of DL in rats. Methods: Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters were measured in male Wistar rats, which under anesthesia had been cannulated in the abdominal aorta and lower vena cava and had electrodes subcutaneously implanted. In the in vitro approach, the heart was removed and perfused using the Langendorff technique. The significance level adopted was 5% (p < 0.05). Results: DL, in doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg (i.v), produced intense and persistent bradycardia associated with hypotension. Bradycardia with prolonged QTc was observed in the ECG in vivo recording. In the in vivo model of arrhythmia induced by Bay K8644, DL (10 mg/kg) decreased the arrhythmia score from 15.33 ± 3.52 to 4.0 ± 2.64 u.a (p < 0.05, n = 4). In isolated perfused hearts, DL (10-3 M) promoted significant reductions in heart rate (from 228.6 ± 8.5 ms to 196.0 ± 9.3 bpm; p < 0.05) and left ventricular development pressure (from 25.2 ± 3.4 to 5.9 ± 1.8 mmHg; n = 5, p < 0.05). Conclusions: DL produces bradycardia and antiarrhythmic activity in rat heart.

Resumo Fundamento: O D-limoneno (DL) é um monoterpeno e o principal componente do óleo essencial de frutas cítricas. Ele apresenta atividades anti-hiperglicêmicas e vasodilatadoras. Objetivos: Este estudo avaliou os efeitos cardiovasculares e antiarrítmicos potenciais do DL em ratos. Métodos: Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos e eletrocardiográficos (ECG) foram mensurados em ratos Wistar machos que, sob anestesia, tiveram a aorta abdominal e a veia cava inferior canuladas e receberam eletrodos implantados subcutaneamente. Na abordagem in vitro, o coração foi removido e perfundido utilizando a técnica de Langendorff. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5% (p < 0,05). Resultados: DL, nas doses de 10, 20 e 40 mg/kg (i.v), produziu bradicardia intensa e persistente associada à hipotensão. A bradicardia com QTc prolongado foi observada no registro in vivo do ECG. No modelo in vivo de arritmia induzida por Bay K8644, DL (10 mg / kg) houve diminuição do escore da arritmia de 15,33 ± 3,52 para 4,0 ± 2,64 u.a (p < 0,05, n = 4). Em corações perfundidos isolados, o DL (10-3 M) promoveu reduções significativas na frequência cardíaca (de 228,6 ± 8,5 ms para 196,0 ± 9,3 bpm; p < 0,05) e na pressão desenvolvida do ventrículo esquerdo (de 25,2 ± 3,4 para 5,9 ± 1,8 mmHg; n = 5, p < 0,05). Conclusões: O DL produz bradicardia e atividade antiarrítmica no coração de ratos.

Fibrilación auricular. Panorámica sobre un tema actualizado / Atrial fibrillation. An update review

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia más común en el mundo, con altas mortalidad y morbilidad. Es la primera causa de eventos embólicos como: el deterioro cognitivo, los episodios de insuficiencia cardíaca y la disminución de la calidad de vida, con repercusión socioeconómica y sanitaria. Hoy, se conoce que la FA comienza por ráfagas de descargas eléctricas anormales, que activan rápida e irregularmente las aurículas. La reciente clasificación de la FA en paroxística, persistente o permanente, refleja el deterioro evolutivo de la arritmia. En la actualidad, existe una amplia gama de fármacos para tratar esta patología. Sobresalen los antiarrítmicos y anticoagulantes, aunque la técnica moderna de la ablación con catéter se ha incluido en las guías clínicas, como alternativa o complemento de los fármacos antiarrítmicos, en pacientes seleccionados con FA.

Atrial fibrillation (FA) it is the most common arrhythmia today, presenting high mortality and morbility levels. It is the first cause of embolic events and episodes of heart inadequacy, cognitive deteriorate and poor life quality. It also brings socioeconomic and sanitary consecuences. Today, FA trigers blasts of abnormal electric discharges, which activate auricles quickly and irregularly. Recent classification of the FA as sudden, persistent and permanent lead to an evolving arrhythmia deterioration. In present times, this pathology is treated using a wide range of drugs. Antiarrhythmics and anticoagulants stand out, although the modern technique of ablation with catheter has been included in the clinical guides, either alternative or complement of antiarrhythmics, in patients affected by FA.

Comparación de la eficacia y seguridad de flecainida y dronedarona como terapias antiarrítmicas para mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal en fibrilación auricular / Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dronedarone and flecainide as maintenance antiarrhythmic therapy for sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation

Resumen Introducción y objetivos: Dronedarona y flecainida son antiarrítmicos de primera elección para reducir recurrencias de fibrilación auricular (FA), sin existir estudios que los comparen entre sí. Nuestro objetivo es comparar la eficacia en cuanto a prevención de recurrencias y seguridad de ambos fármacos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron 123 pacientes de forma consecutiva en tratamiento con flecainida o dronedarona desde octubre de 2010 hasta febrero de 2013 por FA paroxística (76.4%) y FA persistente (23.6%). Se realizó cardioversión eléctrica en un 7.3% de los pacientes y farmacológica en un 16.3%. La mediana (rango intercuartílico) de seguimiento fue de 301 días (92-474), con una media de 2.8 revisiones por paciente. Se realizó análisis de tiempo hasta el primer evento mediante Kaplan-Meier y regresión de Cox ajustada por un índice de propensión. Resultados: De entre los 123 sujetos incluidos con FA, 71 fueron tratados con flecainida y 52 con dronedarona. Durante el seguimiento se registraron 36 recurrencias y 20 efectos adversos. Se documentaron un 36.6% de recurrencias en los pacientes tratados con flecainida en comparación con un 21% en los tratados con dronedarona (p = 0.073). En el análisis multivariante, dronedarona se mostró al menos tan eficaz como flecainida para prevenir recurrencias de FA (HR: 0.53, IC 95%: 0.20-1.44, p = 0.221) y demostró un perfil de seguridad comparable al de flecainida (HR: 0.68, IC 95%: 0.18-2.53, p = 0.566). Conclusiones: Según nuestra experiencia, dronedarona resulta al menos tan eficaz como flecainida para el mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal, con un buen perfil de tolerabilidad, a pesar de pautarse en pacientes con un perfil clínico más desfavorable.

Abstract Introduction and objectives: Dronedarone and flecainide are the first pharmacological choice to reduce recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there are no studies comparing them. A study was performed to compare the efficacy in terms of recurrence of AF and safety of both drugs. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included 123 consecutive patients treated with flecainide or dronedarone due to paroxysmal AF (76.4%) or persistent AF (23.6%), from October 2010 to February 2013. Electrical cardioversion was performed in 7.3% of patients and pharmacological cardioversion in 16.3%. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 301 days (92-474) with a mean of 2.8 reviews per patient. Time to first event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, adjusted for propensity score. Results: Of the 123 consecutive patients with AF included, 71 were on dronedarone and 52 on flecainide. During the follow-up, there were 36 AF recurrences and 20 safety events. There were recurrences in 36.6% of patients treated with flecainide, compared with 21% of those receiving dronedarone (P = .073). Dronedarone showed to be at least as effective as flecainide in preven- ting recurrence of atrial fibrillation (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.20-1.44, P = .221), and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with flecainide (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.18-2.53, P = .566). Conclusions: In our experience, dronedarone has been at least as effective and safe as flecainide, despite it was most frequently prescribed in patients with worse baseline risk profile.

Efecto electromecánico de los antiarrítmicos clase Ic durante el tratamiento de arritmias auriculares en cardiopatías congénitas / Electromechanical effect of Ic class antiarrhythmic drugs during the treatment of atrial arrhythmias in congenital heart diseases

Introducción: los fármacos antiarrítmicos son la primera línea de tratamiento para el control de las taquiarritmias en el paciente pediátrico. La terapéutica con drogas clase Ic en los pacientes con cardiopatías congénitas ha sido limitada, por los reportes que demostraron incremento de la mortalidad en los sujetos con cardiopatías estructurales. Objetivo: valorar el efecto de los antiarrítmicos clase Ic sobre los fenómenos electro-mecánicos cardiacos en los niños con cardiopatías congénitas con arritmias auriculares. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico, observacional, longitudinal y prospectivo en los pacientes con cardiopatías congénitas que desarrollaron arritmias auriculares, tratados con antiarrítmicos clase Ic en el Cardiocentro Pediátrico William Soler . Se analizaron variables electrocardiográficas, así como estimación de la función sistodiastólica mediante el ecocardiograma. Resultados: fueron evaluados 46 pacientes, 25 tratados con flecainida (grupo I) y 21 con propafenona (grupo II) durante 4,57±0,86 años. La taquicardia por reentrada intraatrial fue la arritmia de mayor incidencia (58,69 por ciento), mientras que, la tetralogía de Fallot, el defecto cardiaco más común (36,9 por ciento). Las variables electrocardiográficas no sufrieron variaciones nítidas durante el seguimiento. El análisis comparativo intragrupal demostró la preservación de la función sistólica en la totalidad de los sujetos (I, p= 0,275; II, p= 0,262). Comportamiento análogo exhibió la función diastólica, expresada en el índice de Tei (I, p= 0,244; II, p= 0,286). Conclusiones: la utilización de antiarrítmicos clase Ic en los pacientes pediátricos con cardiopatías congénitas no se asocia a largo plazo con alteraciones electrocardiográficas significativas ni compromiso de la función sistodiastólica, por lo que se recomienda su uso en esta población(AU)

Introduction: antiarrhythmic drugs are the first line of treatment for the control of tachyarrhythmias in pediatric patients. Therapy with Ic class drugs in patients with congenital heart disease has been limited, mainly due to reports that showed an increase in mortality in patients with structural heart disease. Objective: to assess the effect of Ic class antiarrhythmic drugs on cardiac electro-mechanical phenomena in children with congenital heart disease with atrial arrhythmias. Methods: an analytical, observational, longitudinal and prospective study was performed in patients with congenital heart diseases who developed atrial arrhythmias treated with Ic class antiarrhythmic drugs in William Soler Pediatric Cardiocenter. Electrocardiographic variables were analyzed, as well as the estimation of systo-diastolic function by echocardiography. Results: 46 patients were evaluated, 25 treated with flecainide (group I) and 21 with propafenone (group II) during 4.57 ± 0.86 years. The intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia was the arrhythmia with the highest incidence (58.69 percent); while tetralogy of Fallot was the most common cardiac defect (36.9 percent). The electrocardiographic variables did not undergo sharp variations during the follow-up. The intergroup comparative analysis showed the preservation of systolic function in all subjects (I, p= 0.275; II, p= 0.262). Analogous behavior showed diastolic function, that was expressed in the Tei index (I, p= 0.244; II, p= 0.286). Conclusions: the use of Ic class antiarrhythmic drugs in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease is not associated in the long term with significant electrocardiographic alterations or compromise of systo-diastolic function, so its use is recommended in this population(AU)

Taquicardia ventricular refractaria a tratamiento medico en cardiopatía chagástica crónica. Reporte de caso / Ventricular tachycardia refractory to medical treatment in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy. Case Review

La Taquicardia Ventricular en pacientes con cardiomiopatía chagásica surge como consecuencia de la base arritmogénica que la enfermedad desarrolla con el tiempo, y como causa inminente de muerte súbita, resulta esencial el manejo antiarrítmico ade - cuado. Se encuentra en casi un 90% de los pacientes con cardiomiopatía chagásica crónica que acuden con datos de insuiciencia cardíaca y en un 40% de aquellos que no cursan con esta. Caso Clínico: Paciente masculino de 53 años, con enfermedad de chagas, cardiopatía mixta, isquémica e hipertensiva, y taquicardia ventricular, esta última bajo tratamiento combinado diario de larga evolución con lecainida 100 mg po, amiodarona 200mg po y propafenona 150mg po; presentaba cuadro de disnea en reposo y dolor torácico agudo de un día de evolución, a la exploración con presión arterial inaudible, frecuencia cardíaca de 185 latidos por minuto, corazón arrítmico. En el electrocardiograma se encontró taquicardia ventricular monomórica sostenida con complejo QRS ancho. Conclu - sión: No se ha conseguido el control deseado mediante terapia antiarrítmica combinada en este caso de paciente con Taquicardia Ventricular por lo que se recomienda la instalación de dispositivos terapéuticos como ser el cardio desibrilador implantable, la terapia de resincronización cardiaca o la ablación con catéter para mejorar su supervivencia y su calidad de vida...(AU)

Ablación o drogas en la fibrilación auricular paroxística

Resumen Durante años las drogas antiarrítmicas (DAA) han constituido el tratamiento fundacional para los pacientes con fibrilación auricular paroxística (FAP) en los cuales se desea mantener el ritmo sinusal. Debido a las limitaciones en su eficacia, principalmente a largo plazo, sumado a la gran proporción de pacientes que discontinúan la terapia por efectos adversos, nuevas terapias no farmacológicas han sido desarrolladas con el fin de lograr un adecuado control del ritmo. En la última década la ablación por catéter se ha mostrado como la terapia más efectiva y posiblemente la más segura en aquellos pacientes con falla del tratamiento antiarrítmico. Estudios randomizados y metaanálisis recientemente publicados indican que la ablación podría ser considerada como primera línea de terapia en pacientes seleccionados con FAP en quienes se busca controlar el ritmo. Por lo tanto, en este artículo revisaremos la evidencia actual que avala el uso de DAA o ablación en la FAP.

Bioequivalência de cloridrato de propafenona 300mg em comprimido revestido em administração pós-prandial em adultos saudáveis / Bioequivalence of propafenone hydrochloride 300mg film coated tablets in healthy adults

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a bioequivalência de duas formulações de cloridrato de propafenona 300mg em comprimido revestido.MÉTODOS: Estudo randomizado, cruzado, aberto, com dois tratamentos, duas sequências e quatro períodos com 60 participantes sadios de ambos os sexos. Os voluntários foram internados em quatro oportunidades durante 24 horas; em cada período, os sujeitos receberam a formulação teste ou a formulação referência, em regime pós-prandial. Foram coletadas 23 amostras de sangue após administração da droga para determinação plasmática da propafenona. Para quantificação da droga, foi utilizada técnica de cromatografia líquida acoplada à espectrometria de massas sequencial. RESULTADOS: As formulações foram consideradas clinicamente bem toleradas. A concentração máxima e a área sob a curva de zero a 36 horas foram comparadas: a média geométrica da razão entre as formulações teste e referência para concentração máxima foi de 110,16%, com intervalo de confiança de 99,44% a 122,04% e coeficiente de variação de 33,95%. A média geométrica da razão entre as formulações teste e referência para a área sob a curva de zero a 36 horas foi de 107,92%, com intervalo de confiança de 99,58% a 116,96% e coeficiente de variação de 26,39%. A média geométrica da razão entre o medicamento teste e referência para área sob a curva de zero ao infinito foi de 107,12%, com intervalo de confiança de de 99,11% a 115,78% e coeficiente de variação de 25,48%. CONCLUSÃO: As formulações teste e referência foram estatisticamente bioequivalentes, de acordo com sua taxa e extensão de absorção.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of two 300mg profanone hydrochloride coated tablets. METHODS: Randomized, cross-over, openstudy, with two treatments, two sequences, and four periods with 60 healthy participants of both genders. The volunteers were admitted in four opportunities over 24 hours; on each period, the subjects received a test formulation, or a reference formulation, in a postprandial administration. Twenty-three samples of blood were collected after oral administration of the drug for determining plasma level of propafenone. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for quantifying propafenone. RESULTS: The formulations were considered clinically well tolerated. The maximum concentration and the area under the curve from zero to 36 hours were compared: the geometric mean of the ratio between the test and reference formulations for maximum concentration was 110.16%, with confidence interval of 99.44% - 122.04%), coefficient of variation of 33.95%. The geometric mean of the ratio between the test and reference formulations for the area under the curve of zero to 36 hours was 107.92%, with confidence interval of 99.58% - 116.96%, and coefficient of variation of 26.39%. The geometric mean of the ratio between the formulations for area under the curve of zero to infinitum as 107.12% with confidence interval of 99.11% - 115.78%),and coefficient of variation of 25.48%. CONCLUSION: According to the rate and extension of absorption, the test and reference formulations are statistically bioequivalent.