Nanodelivery of histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist BF-2649 with H3 receptor antagonist and H4 receptor agonist clobenpropit induced neuroprotection is potentiated by antioxidant compound H-290/51 in spinal cord injury.

Military personnel are often victims of spinal cord injury resulting in lifetime disability and decrease in quality of life. However, no suitable therapeutic measures are still available to restore functional disability or arresting the pathophysiological progression of disease in victims for leading a better quality of life. Thus, further research in spinal cord injury using novel strategies or combination of available neuroprotective drugs is urgently needed for superior neuroprotection. In this regard, our laboratory is engaged in developing TiO2 nanowired delivery of drugs, antibodies and enzymes in combination to attenuate spinal cord injury induced pathophysiology and functional disability in experimental rodent model. Previous observations show that histamine antagonists or antioxidant compounds when given alone in spinal cord injury are able to induce neuroprotection for short periods after trauma. In this investigation we used a combination of histaminergic drugs with antioxidant compound H-290/51 using their nanowired delivery for neuroprotection in spinal cord injury of longer duration. Our observations show that a combination of H3 receptor inverse agonist BF-2549 with H3 receptor antagonist and H4 receptor agonist clobenpropit induced neuroprotection is potentiated by antioxidant compound H-290/51 in spinal cord injury. These observations suggests that histamine receptors are involved in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury and induce superior neuroprotection in combination with an inhibitor of lipid peroxidation H-290/51, not reported earlier. The possible mechanisms and significance of our findings in relation to future clinical approaches in spinal cord injury is discussed.

Histamine H3 Inverse Agonist BF 2649 or Antagonist with Partial H4 Agonist Activity Clobenpropit Reduces Amyloid Beta Peptide-Induced Brain Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the leading causes for disability and death affecting millions of people worldwide. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies are needed to reduce brain pathology associated with AD. In view of increasing awareness regarding involvement of histaminergic pathways in AD, we explored the role of one H3 receptor inverse agonist BF 2649 and one selective H3 receptor antagonist with partial H4 agonist activity in amyloid beta peptide (AßP) infusion-induced brain pathology in a rat model. AD-like pathology was produced by administering AßP (1-40) intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) in the left lateral ventricle (250 ng/10 µl, once daily) for 4 weeks. Control rats received saline. In separate group of rats, either BF 2649 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) or clobenpropit (1 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered once daily for 1 week after 3 weeks of AßP administration. After 30 days, blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, edema formation, neuronal, glial injuries, and AßP deposits were examined in the brain. A significant reduction in AßP deposits along with marked reduction in neuronal or glial reactions was seen in the drug-treated group. The BBB breakdown to Evans blue albumin and radioiodine in the cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and cerebellum was also significantly reduced in these drug-treated groups. Clobenpropit showed superior effects than the BF2649 in reducing brain pathology in AD. Taken together, our observations are the first to show that blockade of H3 and stimulation of H4 receptors are beneficial for the treatment of AD pathology, not reported earlier.

Effects of pitolisant, a histamine H3 inverse agonist, in drug-resistant idiopathic and symptomatic hypersomnia: a chart review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of pitolisant (a wake-enhancing drug that increases the histamine release in the brain by blocking presynaptic H3 histamine reuptake) in patients with idiopathic (IH) and symptomatic (SH) hypersomnia plus sleepiness refractory to available stimulants (modafinil, methylphenidate, mazindol, sodium oxybate, and d-amphetamine). METHODS: Through retrospective analyses of patient files, the benefit (the score from the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], authorization renewal) and tolerance (side-effects) of pitolisant were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients with IH (n=65%, 78% women) and SH (n=13%, 54% women) received pitolisant 5-50 mg once per day over the course of five days to 37 months. The median (interquartile range) ESS scores of patients with IH decreased from 17 (15.5-18.5) to 14 (12-17). There were 36% responders (ESS fall of > or =3). The improvement in ESS score (-1.9±2.6) was different from 0 in IH without long sleep time (P<0.002) and in IH with a long sleep time (P<0.0001), but not in SH. Forty-four (63%) patients with IH and 12 (77%) patients with SH stopped pitolisant, mostly due to a lack of efficacy. Side-effects included gastrointestinal pain (15.4%), increased appetite and weight gain (14.1%), headache (12.8%), insomnia (11.5%), and anxiety (9%), as well as exceptional reports of depression and persistent genital arousal. CONCLUSION: Pitolisant had a long-term favorable benefit/risk ratio in 23-38% of drug-resistant patients with IH and SH, suggesting that histamine neurons can be stimulated in severe idiopathic and symptomatic hypersomnia.