Linking menopause-related factors, history of depression, APOE ε4, and proxies of biological aging in the UK biobank cohort.

In a subset of females, postmenopausal status has been linked to accelerated aging and neurological decline. A complex interplay between reproductive-related factors, mental disorders, and genetics may influence brain function and accelerate the rate of aging in the postmenopausal phase. Using multiple regressions corrected for age, in this preregistered study we investigated the associations between menopause-related factors (i.e., menopausal status, menopause type, age at menopause, and reproductive span) and proxies of cellular aging (leukocyte telomere length, LTL) and brain aging (white and gray matter brain age gap, BAG) in 13,780 females from the UK Biobank (age range 39-82). We then determined how these proxies of aging were associated with each other, and evaluated the effects of menopause-related factors, history of depression (= lifetime broad depression), and APOE ε4 genotype on BAG and LTL, examining both additive and interactive relationships. We found that postmenopausal status and older age at natural menopause were linked to longer LTL and lower BAG. Surgical menopause and longer natural reproductive span were also associated with longer LTL. BAG and LTL were not significantly associated with each other. The greatest variance in each proxy of biological aging was most consistently explained by models with the addition of both lifetime broad depression and APOE ε4 genotype. Overall, this study demonstrates a complex interplay between menopause-related factors, lifetime broad depression, APOE ε4 genotype, and proxies of biological aging. However, results are potentially influenced by a disproportionate number of healthier participants among postmenopausal females. Future longitudinal studies incorporating heterogeneous samples are an essential step towards advancing female health.

Multiscale functional connectivity patterns of the aging brain learned from harmonized rsfMRI data of the multi-cohort iSTAGING study.

To learn multiscale functional connectivity patterns of the aging brain, we built a brain age prediction model of functional connectivity measures at seven scales on a large fMRI dataset, consisting of resting-state fMRI scans of 4186 individuals with a wide age range (22 to 97 years, with an average of 63) from five cohorts. We computed multiscale functional connectivity measures of individual subjects using a personalized functional network computational method, harmonized the functional connectivity measures of subjects from multiple datasets in order to build a functional brain age model, and finally evaluated how functional brain age gap correlated with cognitive measures of individual subjects. Our study has revealed that functional connectivity measures at multiple scales were more informative than those at any single scale for the brain age prediction, the data harmonization significantly improved the brain age prediction performance, and the data harmonization in the functional connectivity measures' tangent space worked better than in their original space. Moreover, brain age gap scores of individual subjects derived from the brain age prediction model were significantly correlated with clinical and cognitive measures. Overall, these results demonstrated that multiscale functional connectivity patterns learned from a large-scale multi-site rsfMRI dataset were informative for characterizing the aging brain and the derived brain age gap was associated with cognitive and clinical measures.

Maternal Depressive Symptoms During Pregnancy and Brain Age in Young Adult Offspring: Findings from a Prenatal Birth Cohort.

Maternal depression during pregnancy is associated with elevated risk of anxiety and depression in offspring, but the mechanisms are incompletely understood. Here we conducted a neuroimaging follow-up of a prenatal birth cohort from the European Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (n = 131; 53% women, age 23-24) to test whether deviations from age-normative structural brain development in young adulthood may partially underlie this link. Structural brain age was calculated based on previously published neuroanatomical age prediction models using cortical thickness maps from healthy controls aged 6-89. Brain age gap was computed as the difference between chronological and structural brain age. Participants also completed self-report measures of anxiety and mood dysregulation. Further, mothers of a subset of participants (n = 103, 54% women) answered a self-report questionnaire in 1990-1992 about depressive symptoms during pregnancy. Higher exposure to maternal depressive symptoms in utero showed a linear relationship with elevated brain age gap, which showed a quadratic relationship with anxiety and mood dysregulation in the young adult offspring. Our findings suggest that exposure to maternal depressive symptoms in utero may be associated with accelerated brain maturation and that deviations from age-normative structural brain development in either direction predict more anxiety and dysregulated mood in young adulthood.

The impact of age-related hearing loss on cognitive decline: The mediating role of brain age gap.

In recent years, the relationship between age-related hearing loss, cognitive decline, and the risk of dementia has garnered significant attention. The significant variability in brain health and aging among individuals of the same chronological age suggests that a measure assessing how one's brain ages may better explain hearing-cognition links. The main aim of this study was to investigate the mediating role of Brain Age Gap (BAG) in the association between hearing impairment and cognitive function. This research included 185 participants aged 20-79 years. BAG was estimated based on the difference between participant's brain age (estimated based on their structural T1-weighted MRI scans) and chronological age. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test while hearing ability was measured using pure-tone thresholds (PTT) and words-in-noise (WIN) perception. Mediation analyses were used to examine the mediating role of BAG in the relationship between age-related hearing loss as well as difficulties in WIN perception and cognition. Participants with poorer hearing sensitivity and WIN perception showed lower MoCA scores, but this was an indirect effect. Participants with poorer performance on PTT and WIN tests had larger BAG (accelerated brain aging), and this was associated with poorer performance on the MoCA test. Mediation analyses showed that BAG partially mediated the relationship between age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline. This study enhances our understanding of the interplay among hearing loss, cognition, and BAG, emphasizing the potential value of incorporating brain age assessments in clinical evaluations to gain insights beyond chronological age, thus advancing strategies for preserving cognitive health in aging populations.

Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates' biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates' brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements. METHODS: We trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites. RESULTS: In both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model's brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: The magnitude of neonates' brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.

Brain age gap estimation using attention-based ResNet method for Alzheimer's disease detection.

This study investigates the correlation between brain age and chronological age in healthy individuals using brain MRI images, aiming to identify potential biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. To achieve this, a novel attention-based ResNet method, 3D-Attention-Resent-SVR, is proposed to accurately estimate brain age and distinguish between Cognitively Normal (CN) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) individuals by computing the brain age gap (BAG). Unlike conventional methods, which often rely on single datasets, our approach addresses potential biases by employing four datasets for training and testing. The results, based on a combined dataset from four public sources comprising 3844 data points, demonstrate the model's efficacy with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.05 for brain age gap estimation. Moreover, the model's generalizability is showcased by training on three datasets and testing on a separate one, yielding a remarkable MAE of 2.4. Furthermore, leveraging BAG as the sole biomarker, our method achieves an accuracy of 92% and an AUC of 0.87 in Alzheimer's disease detection on the ADNI dataset. These findings underscore the potential of our approach in assisting with early detection and disease monitoring, emphasizing the strong correlation between BAG and AD.

Analysis of Brain Age Gap across Subject Cohorts and Prediction Model Architectures.

Background: Brain age prediction from brain MRI scans and the resulting brain age gap (BAG)-the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age-is a general biomarker for a variety of neurological, psychiatric, and other diseases or disorders. Methods: This study examined the differences in BAG values derived from T1-weighted scans using five state-of-the-art deep learning model architectures previously used in the brain age literature: 2D/3D VGG, RelationNet, ResNet, and SFCN. The models were evaluated on healthy controls and cohorts with sleep apnea, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease, employing rigorous statistical analysis, including repeated model training and linear mixed-effects models. Results: All five models consistently identified a statistically significant positive BAG for diabetes (ranging from 0.79 years with RelationNet to 2.13 years with SFCN), multiple sclerosis (2.67 years with 3D VGG to 4.24 years with 2D VGG), mild cognitive impairment (2.13 years with 2D VGG to 2.59 years with 3D VGG), and Alzheimer's dementia (5.54 years with ResNet to 6.48 years with SFCN). For Parkinson's disease, a statistically significant BAG increase was observed in all models except ResNet (1.30 years with 2D VGG to 2.59 years with 3D VGG). For sleep apnea, a statistically significant BAG increase was only detected with the SFCN model (1.59 years). Additionally, we observed a trend of decreasing BAG with increasing chronological age, which was more pronounced in diseased cohorts, particularly those with the largest BAG, such as multiple sclerosis (-0.34 to -0.2), mild cognitive impairment (-0.37 to -0.26), and Alzheimer's dementia (-0.66 to -0.47), compared to healthy controls (-0.18 to -0.1). Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, Alzheimer's dementia and multiple sclerosis exhibited the largest BAG across all models, with SFCN predicting the highest BAG overall. The negative BAG trend suggests a complex interplay of survival bias, disease progression, adaptation, and therapy that influences brain age prediction across the age spectrum.

Toward MR protocol-agnostic, bias-corrected brain age predicted from clinical-grade MRIs.

The predicted brain age minus the chronological age ('brain-PAD') could become a clinical biomarker. However, most brain age methods were developed to use research-grade high-resolution T1-weighted MRIs, limiting their applicability to clinical-grade MRIs from multiple protocols. To overcome this, we adopted a double transfer learning approach to develop a brain age model agnostic to modality, resolution, or slice orientation. Using 6,224 clinical MRIs among 7 modalities, scanned from 1,540 patients using 8 scanners among 15 + facilities of the University of Florida's Health System, we retrained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict brain age from synthetic research-grade magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo MRIs (MPRAGEs) generated by a deep learning-trained 'super-resolution' method. We also modeled the "regression dilution bias", a typical overestimation of younger ages and underestimation of older ages, which correction is paramount for personalized brain age-based biomarkers. This bias was independent of modality or scanner and generalizable to new samples, allowing us to add a bias-correction layer to the CNN. The mean absolute error in test samples was 4.67-6.47 years across modalities, with similar accuracy between original MPRAGEs and their synthetic counterparts. Brain-PAD was also reliable across modalities. We demonstrate the feasibility of clinical-grade brain age predictions, contributing to personalized medicine.

Is musical engagement enough to keep the brain young?

Music-making and engagement in music-related activities have shown procognitive benefits for healthy and pathological populations, suggesting reductions in brain aging. A previous brain aging study, using Brain Age Gap Estimation (BrainAGE), showed that professional and amateur-musicians had younger appearing brains than non-musicians. Our study sought to replicate those findings and analyze if musical training or active musical engagement was necessary to produce an age-decelerating effect in a cohort of healthy individuals. We scanned 125 healthy controls and investigated if musician status, and if musical behaviors, namely active engagement (AE) and musical training (MT) [as measured using the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI)], had effects on brain aging. Our findings suggest that musician status is not related to BrainAGE score, although involvement in current physical activity is. Although neither MT nor AE subscales of the Gold-MSI are predictive for BrainAGE scores, dispositional resilience, namely the ability to deal with challenge, is related to both musical behaviors and sensitivity to musical pleasure. While the study failed to replicate the findings in a previous brain aging study, musical training and active musical engagement are related to the resilience factor of challenge. This finding may reveal how such musical behaviors can potentially strengthen the brain's resilience to age, which may tap into a type of neurocognitive reserve.

The Developmental Brain Age Is Associated With Adversity, Depression, and Functional Outcomes Among Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Most psychiatric disorders emerge in the second decade of life. In the present study, we examined whether environmental adversity, developmental antecedents, major depressive disorder, and functional impairment correlate with deviation from normative brain development in adolescence. METHODS: We trained a brain age prediction model using 189 structural magnetic resonance imaging brain features in 1299 typically developing adolescents (age range 9-19 years, mean = 13.5, SD = 3.04), validated the model in a holdout set of 322 adolescents (mean = 13.5, SD = 3.07), and used it to predict age in an independent risk-enriched cohort of 150 adolescents (mean = 13.6, SD = 2.82). We tested associations between the brain age gap and adversity, early antecedents, depression, and functional impairment. RESULTS: We accurately predicted chronological age in typically developing adolescents (mean absolute error = 1.53 years). The model generalized to the validation set (mean absolute error = 1.55 years, 1.98 bias adjusted) and to the independent at-risk sample (mean absolute error = 1.49 years, 1.86 bias adjusted). The brain age estimate was reliable in repeated scans (intraclass correlation = 0.94). Experience of environmental adversity (ß = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.31; p = .02), diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ß = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.99; p = .01), and functional impairment (ß = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.27; p = .01) were associated with a positive brain age gap. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors, diagnosis, and impact of mental illness are associated with an older-appearing brain during development.

Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Aberrant Brain Age Trajectory During Youth in Schizophrenia Patients.

Accelerated brain aging had been widely reported in patients with schizophrenia (SZ). However, brain aging trajectories in SZ patients have not been well-documented using three-modal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. In this study, 138 schizophrenia patients and 205 normal controls aged 20-60 were included and multimodal MRI data were acquired for each individual, including structural MRI, resting state-functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging. The brain age of each participant was estimated by features extracted from multimodal MRI data using linear multiple regression. The correlation between the brain age gap and chronological age in SZ patients was best fitted by a positive quadratic curve with a peak chronological age of 47.33 years. We used the peak to divide the subjects into a youth group and a middle age group. In the normal controls, brain age matched chronological age well for both the youth and middle age groups, but this was not the case for schizophrenia patients. More importantly, schizophrenia patients exhibited increased brain age in the youth group but not in the middle age group. In this study, we aimed to investigate brain aging trajectories in SZ patients using multimodal MRI data and revealed an aberrant brain age trajectory in young schizophrenia patients, providing new insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of schizophrenia.

Linking Brain Age Gap to Mental and Physical Health in the Berlin Aging Study II.

From a biological perspective, humans differ in the speed they age, and this may manifest in both mental and physical health disparities. The discrepancy between an individual's biological and chronological age of the brain ("brain age gap") can be assessed by applying machine learning techniques to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. Here, we examined the links between brain age gap and a broad range of cognitive, affective, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and physical health variables in up to 335 adults of the Berlin Aging Study II. Brain age gap was assessed using a validated prediction model that we previously trained on MRI scans of 32,634 UK Biobank individuals. Our statistical analyses revealed overall stronger evidence for a link between higher brain age gap and less favorable health characteristics than expected under the null hypothesis of no effect, with 80% of the tested associations showing hypothesis-consistent effect directions and 23% reaching nominal significance. The most compelling support was observed for a cluster covering both cognitive performance variables (episodic memory, working memory, fluid intelligence, digit symbol substitution test) and socioeconomic variables (years of education and household income). Furthermore, we observed higher brain age gap to be associated with heavy episodic drinking, higher blood pressure, and higher blood glucose. In sum, our results point toward multifaceted links between brain age gap and human health. Understanding differences in biological brain aging may therefore have broad implications for future informed interventions to preserve mental and physical health in old age.

Pet ownership is associated with greater cognitive and brain health in a cross-sectional sample across the adult lifespan.

Human-animal interactions that stem from pet ownership have a wide range of benefits for social, emotional, and physical health. These factors also tend to improve cognition. Following this logic, owning a pet could indirectly enhance cognitive and brain health through mechanisms like improvements in well-being, socialization, and decreased stress. In the present study, cross-sectional data were drawn from the Alabama Brain Study on Risk for Dementia in which 95 participants aged 20-74 were recruited. Specifically, 56 adults were pet-owners and 39 adults were not pet-owners. Multivariate analyses revealed that pet ownership was related to higher levels of cognition and larger brain structures, and these effects were largest in dog owners. The most consistent cognitive relationships were found with better processing speed, attentional orienting, and episodic memory for stories, and with dorsal attention, limbic, and default mode networks. Moreover, we show that owning a pet can reduce one's brain age by up to 15 years. Pet ownership was not related to indirect factors including social, emotional, and physical health. We found also that older adults' brain health benefited from owning more than one pet versus owning one or fewer pets. These findings indicate that pet ownership, especially dog ownership, may play a role in enhancing cognitive performance across the adult lifespan, which could in turn influence protection against age-related cognitive decline.

Validation of neuroimaging-based brain age gap as a mediator between modifiable risk factors and cognition.

Neuroimaging-based brain age gap (BAG) is presumably a mediator linking modifiable risk factors to cognitive changes, but this has not been verified yet. To address this hypothesis, modality-specific brain age models were constructed and applied to a population-based cohort (N = 326) to estimate their BAG. Structural equation modeling was employed to investigate the mediation effect of BAG between modifiable risk factors (assessed by 2 cardiovascular risk scores) and cognitive functioning (examined by 4 cognitive assessments). The association between higher burden of modifiable risk factors and poorer cognitive functioning can be significantly mediated by a larger BAG (multimodal: p = 0.014, 40.8% mediation proportion; white matter-based: p = 0.023, 15.7% mediation proportion), which indicated an older brain. Subgroup analysis further revealed a steeper slope (p = 0.019) of association between cognitive functioning and multimodal BAG in the group of higher modifiable risks. The results confirm that BAG can serve as a mediating indicator linking risk loadings to cognitive functioning, implicating its potential in the management of cognitive aging and dementia.

Multimodal brain age prediction fusing morphometric and imaging data and association with cardiovascular risk factors.

Introduction: The difference between the chronological and biological brain age, called the brain age gap (BAG), has been identified as a promising biomarker to detect deviation from normal brain aging and to indicate the presence of neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, the BAG has been shown to encode biological information about general health, which can be measured through cardiovascular risk factors. Current approaches for biological brain age estimation, and therefore BAG estimation, either depend on hand-crafted, morphological measurements extracted from brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or on direct analysis of brain MRI images. The former can be processed with traditional machine learning models while the latter is commonly processed with convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Using a multimodal setting, this study aims to compare both approaches in terms of biological brain age prediction accuracy and biological information captured in the BAG. Methods: T1-weighted MRI, containing brain tissue information, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), providing information about brain arteries, from 1,658 predominantly healthy adults were used. The volumes, surface areas, and cortical thickness of brain structures were extracted from the T1-weighted MRI data, while artery density and thickness within the major blood flow territories and thickness of the major arteries were extracted from MRA data. Independent multilayer perceptron and CNN models were trained to estimate the brain age from the hand-crafted features and image data, respectively. Next, both approaches were fused to assess the benefits of combining image data and hand-crafted features for brain age prediction. Results: The combined model achieved a mean absolute error of 4 years between the chronological and predicted biological brain age. Among the independent models, the lowest mean absolute error was observed for the CNN using T1-weighted MRI data (4.2 years). When evaluating the BAGs obtained using the different approaches and imaging modalities, diverging associations between cardiovascular risk factors were found. For example, BAGs obtained from the CNN models showed an association with systolic blood pressure, while BAGs obtained from hand-crafted measurements showed greater associations with obesity markers. Discussion: In conclusion, the use of more diverse sources of data can improve brain age estimation modeling and capture more diverse biological deviations from normal aging.

Assessing brain and biological aging trajectories associated with Alzheimer's disease.

The development of effective treatments to prevent and slow Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis is needed in order to tackle the steady increase in the global prevalence of AD. This challenge is complicated by the need to identify key health shifts that precede the onset of AD and cognitive decline as these represent windows of opportunity for intervening and preventing disease. Such shifts may be captured through the measurement of biomarkers that reflect the health of the individual, in particular those that reflect brain age and biological age. Brain age biomarkers provide a composite view of the health of the brain based on neuroanatomical analyses, while biological age biomarkers, which encompass the epigenetic clock, provide a measurement of the overall health state of an individual based on DNA methylation analysis. Acceleration of brain and biological ages is associated with changes in cognitive function, as well as neuropathological markers of AD. In this mini-review, we discuss brain age and biological age research in the context of cognitive decline and AD. While more research is needed, studies show that brain and biological aging trajectories are variable across individuals and that such trajectories are non-linear at older ages. Longitudinal monitoring of these biomarkers may be valuable for enabling earlier identification of divergent pathological trajectories toward AD and providing insight into points for intervention.

Predicting the brain age of children with cerebral palsy using a two-dimensional convolutional neural networks prediction model without gray and white matter segmentation.

Background: Abnormal brain development is common in children with cerebral palsy (CP), but there are no recent reports on the actual brain age of children with CP. Objective: Our objective is to use the brain age prediction model to explore the law of brain development in children with CP. Methods: A two-dimensional convolutional neural networks brain age prediction model was designed without segmenting the white and gray matter. Training and testing brain age prediction model using magnetic resonance images of healthy people in a public database. The brain age of children with CP aged 5-27 years old was predicted. Results: The training dataset mean absolute error (MAE) = 1.85, r = 0.99; test dataset MAE = 3.98, r = 0.95. The brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE) of the 5- to 27-year-old patients with CP was generally higher than that of healthy peers (p < 0.0001). The BrainAGE of male patients with CP was higher than that of female patients (p < 0.05). The BrainAGE of patients with bilateral spastic CP was higher than those with unilateral spastic CP (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A two-dimensional convolutional neural networks brain age prediction model allows for brain age prediction using routine hospital T1-weighted head MRI without segmenting the white and gray matter of the brain. At the same time, these findings suggest that brain aging occurs in patients with CP after brain damage. Female patients with CP are more likely to return to their original brain development trajectory than male patients after brain injury. In patients with spastic CP, brain aging is more serious in those with bilateral cerebral hemisphere injury than in those with unilateral cerebral hemisphere injury.

An exploratory causal analysis of the relationships between the brain age gap and cardiovascular risk factors.

The brain age gap (BAG) has been shown to capture accelerated brain aging patterns and might serve as a biomarker for several neurological diseases. Moreover, it was also shown that it captures other biological information related to modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. Previous studies have explored statistical relationships between the BAG and cardiovascular risk factors. However, none of those studies explored causal relationships between the BAG and cardiovascular risk factors. In this work, we employ causal structure discovery techniques and define a Bayesian network to model the assumed causal relationships between the BAG, estimated using morphometric T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging brain features from 2025 adults, and several cardiovascular risk factors. This setup allows us to not only assess observed conditional probability distributions of the BAG given cardiovascular risk factors, but also to isolate the causal effect of each cardiovascular risk factor on BAG using causal inference. Results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed causal analysis approach by illustrating intuitive causal relationships between variables. For example, body-mass-index, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking, and alcohol consumption were found to impact the BAG, with the greatest impact for obesity markers resulting in higher chances of developing accelerated brain aging. Moreover, the findings show that causal effects differ from correlational effects, demonstrating the importance of accounting for variable relationships and confounders when evaluating the information captured by a biomarker. Our work demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of using causal analyses instead of purely correlation-based and univariate statistical analyses in the context of brain aging and related problems.

Machine learning for brain age prediction: Introduction to methods and clinical applications.

The rise of machine learning has unlocked new ways of analysing structural neuroimaging data, including brain age prediction. In this state-of-the-art review, we provide an introduction to the methods and potential clinical applications of brain age prediction. Studies on brain age typically involve the creation of a regression machine learning model of age-related neuroanatomical changes in healthy people. This model is then applied to new subjects to predict their brain age. The difference between predicted brain age and chronological age in a given individual is known as 'brain-age gap'. This value is thought to reflect neuroanatomical abnormalities and may be a marker of overall brain health. It may aid early detection of brain-based disorders and support differential diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment choices. These applications could lead to more timely and more targeted interventions in age-related disorders.

Apolipoprotein ɛ4 Status and Brain Structure 12 Months after Mild Traumatic Injury: Brain Age Prediction Using Brain Morphometry and Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ɛ4 is associated with poor outcome following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is a lack of studies investigating the influence of APOE ɛ4 on intracranial pathology following mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). This study explores the association between APOE ɛ4 and MRI measures of brain age prediction, brain morphometry, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS: Patients aged 16 to 65 with acute MTBI admitted to the trauma center were included. Multimodal MRI was performed 12 months after injury and associated with APOE ɛ4 status. Corrections for multiple comparisons were done using false discovery rate (FDR). RESULTS: Of included patients, 123 patients had available APOE, volumetric, and DTI data of sufficient quality. There were no differences between APOE ɛ4 carriers (39%) and non-carriers in demographic and clinical data. Age prediction revealed high accuracy both for the DTI-based and the brain morphometry based model. Group comparisons revealed no significant differences in brain-age gap between ɛ4 carriers and non-carriers, and no significant differences in conventional measures of brain morphometry and volumes. Compared to non-carriers, APOE ɛ4 carriers showed lower fractional anisotropy (FA) in the hippocampal part of the cingulum bundle, which did not remain significant after FDR adjustment. CONCLUSION: APOE ɛ4 carriers might be vulnerable to reduced neuronal integrity in the cingulum. Larger cohort studies are warranted to replicate this finding.