A randomized trial of double vs single-dose etonogestrel implant to overcome the interaction with efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant use of efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy and a standard-dose etonogestrel contraceptive implant led to 82% lower etonogestrel exposure when compared with women who do not receive antiretroviral therapy. The clinical impact of this reduced exposure is supported by retrospective cohort evaluations that demonstrated higher rates of unintended pregnancies when contraceptive implants were combined with efavirenz. We hypothesized that placement of 2 etonogestrel implants in those taking efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy could increase etonogestrel exposure and improve measures of contraceptive efficacy. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the rate of ovulation and etonogestrel pharmacokinetics among women on efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy who received 2 etonogestrel implants (136 mg; double implant group) in comparison with those who received 1 etonogestrel implant (68 mg; control group). STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, open-label study enrolled Ugandan women with regular menstrual periods who were receiving efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the double implant or control group, and the etonogestrel implant(s) were placed in the same arm at enrollment. All participants used a copper intrauterine device to prevent pregnancy. Ovulation was evaluated by weekly serum progesterone concentrations measured over 4 consecutive weeks at months 3 (weeks 9-12), 6 (weeks 21-24), and 12 (weeks 45-48). Progesterone concentrations >3 ng/mL were interpreted as ovulation. The ovulation rate in each group was compared using Fisher's exact tests for each month and generalized estimating equations over 48 weeks. Plasma was collected at day 3 and weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 after implant placement and analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method for etonogestrel. Etonogestrel concentrations were summarized as median (interquartile range) and compared between groups by geometric mean ratio with 90% confidence intervals. RESULTS: All participants (n=72) were cisgender Ugandan women with a median age of 31 years (interquartile range, 29-36), and 36 participants were enrolled in each study group. Two participants in the control group discontinued the trial; 1 at week 1 because of undetected pregnancy at entry and another at week 45 because of clinically significant depression. There were 47 ovulations over 104 person-months (45%) in 25 of 34 participants in the control group, and 2 ovulations over 108 person-months (2%) in 2 of 36 participants in the double implant group (month 3: 11 [31%] vs 0 [0%]; month 6: 17 [49%] vs 0 [0%]; month 12: 19 [56%] vs 2 [6%], respectively; all P<.001). The odds of ovulation were reduced by 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 90.1-99.5) in the double implant group over 48 weeks. At each time point, etonogestrel concentration was more than 2-fold higher in the double implant group than in the controls (geometric mean ratio, 2.30-2.83) with a geometric mean ratio of 2.83 (90% confidence interval, 1.89-3.35) at week 48. There were no differences in the adverse events between groups and no participant discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Over 48 weeks of combined use, placing 2 etonogestrel implants suppressed ovulation and increased plasma etonogestrel exposure when compared with 1 etonogestrel implant among women on efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. Doubling the dose of etonogestrel during efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy could improve contraceptive effectiveness.

Offering extended use of the contraceptive implant via an implementation science framework: a qualitative study of clinicians' perceived barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND: The etonogestrel contraceptive implant is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of pregnancy up to 3 years. However, studies that suggest efficacy up to 5 years. There is little information on the prevalence of extended use and the factors that influence clinicians in offering extended use. We investigated clinician perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to offering extended use of the contraceptive implant. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from a nationwide survey study of reproductive health clinicians on their knowledge and perspective of extended use of the contraceptive implant. To optimize the diversity of perspectives, we purposefully sampled participants from this study. We used content analysis and consensual qualitative research methods to inform our coding and data analysis. Themes arose deductively and inductively. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 clinicians including advance practice clinicians, family medicine physicians, obstetrician/gynecologist and complex family planning sub-specialists. Themes regarding barriers and facilitators to extended use of the contraceptive implant emerged. Barriers included the FDA approval for 3 years and clinician concern about liability in the context of off-label use of the contraceptive implant. Educational materials and a champion of extended use were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: There is opportunity to expand access to extended use of the contraceptive implant by developing educational materials for clinicians and patients, identifying a champion of extended use, and providing information on extended use prior to replacement appointments at 3 years.

Views and experiences of young women from a migrant or refugee background regarding the contraceptive implant in Australia.

Young people comprise a significant proportion of migrants and refugees in Australia. Many encounter challenges in accessing contraception information and services. This study explored the views and experiences of young women from migrant and/or refugee backgrounds regarding the contraceptive implant and related decision-making. Interviews were conducted with 33 women, aged 15-24, living in New South Wales, Australia, who spoke a language other than English and had some experience of the implant. Three themes were developed from the data as follows: 'Finding your own path': contraception decision-making (in which participants described sex and contraception as being taboo in their community, yet still made independent contraceptive choices); Accessing 'trustworthy' contraception information and navigating services (in which participants consulted online resources and social media for contraception information, and preferred discussions with healthcare providers from outside their community); and Views and experiences of the contraceptive implant (while the implant was described as a 'Western' method, most participants regarded it as an acceptable, convenient, cost-effective, and confidential means of contraception). Decision-making regarding the implant is influenced by many factors which must be considered in health promotion efforts and when providing clinical care. Consideration of more informative health promotion resources, peer education strategies, and healthcare provider training is warranted to support contraception decision-making and choice.

Nonpalpable implant removals at centre of experience in France: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE(S): Management and localisation strategies to remove nonpalpable contraceptive implants may be difficult. We aimed to evaluate our imaging modalities to identify deep implant and patient outcomes related to removal. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study, we reviewed all cases referred to our specialised centre for nonpalpable contraceptive implants from January 2018 to August 2022. RESULTS: Out of the cohort studied, 47 female subjects exhibited nonpalpable implants. The implant was nonpalpable for thirty-six patients (76,6%) immediately after the insertion whereas it was not palpable several months after the insertion for eleven patients (23.4%). Twelve patients (25.5%) had one or more failed removal attempts before referral.All 47 implants were successfully visualised via ultrasound in the upper arm: 40 implants (85.1%) were located in the subdermal tissue, 4 (8.5%) were intrafascial and 3 (6.4%) were intramuscular. Depth of the implant was 4.0 mm [1.7 - 12.0]. No clinical factors were statistically associated with differences in depth or location (subdermal vs subfascial). Removal procedures were mainly under local anaesthesia in 74.5% of cases in an outpatient setting. There were two Clavien-Dindo grade 1 complications (one case of cutaneous scar dehiscence and one transient postoperative neuropathic complaint in the upper arm resolved within 3 months under analgetics). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of deep implants requires following the ultrasound modality protocol. Ultrasound detection makes easy and safe implant removal. Training programs for the insertion as well as for the removal of correct and incorrect inserted implants should be continued and developed all around the world.

Migration of etonogestrel subcutaneous contraceptive implants: systematic review and recommendations for practice.

INTRODUCTION: Migration is a rare but serious complication of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant, and little is known about its extent. PURPOSE: To document and characterise cases of etonogestrel contraceptive implant migration in the scientific literature. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, Embase and Global Health databases was carried out between January 2000 and January 2023 to identify articles presenting implant migrations. Narrative reviews, conference abstracts and articles not written in English or French were excluded. RESULTS: Forty-five articles, mostly published since 2016, were identified (eight case series and 37 case reports), for a total of 148 independent cases of migration: in pulmonary blood vessels (n = 74), in non-pulmonary blood vessels (n = 16) and extravascular (n = 58). Many patients are asymptomatic and migration is often an incidental finding. A non-palpable implant and symptoms related to implant location (intra- or extra-vascular) may be indicative of migration. Inadequate insertion and normal or underweight appear to increase the risk of migration. Scientific societies and authors offer practical strategies to deal with implant migration. CONCLUSION: Professionals who insert and remove contraceptive implants must be adequately trained. They need to be on the lookout for implant migration, and promptly refer patients to appropriate care if migration is suspected.

This systematic review documents and characterises 148 cases of vascular and extravascular etonogestrel contraceptive implant migration. Healthcare professionals must be aware of this rare but serious complication and be adequately trained to insert and remove contraceptive implants.

Lactogenesis and breastfeeding after immediate vs delayed birth-hospitalization insertion of etonogestrel contraceptive implant: a noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Initiating a progestin-based contraceptive before the drop in progesterone required to start lactogenesis stage II could theoretically affect lactation. Previous studies have shown that initiating progestin-based contraception in the postnatal period before birth-hospitalization discharge has no detrimental effects on breastfeeding initiation or continuation compared with outpatient interval initiation. However, there are currently no breastfeeding data on the impact of initiating the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in the early postnatal period immediately in the delivery room. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of delivery room vs delayed birth-hospitalization contraceptive etonogestrel implant insertion on breastfeeding outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a noninferiority randomized controlled trial to determine if time to lactogenesis stage II (initiation of copious milk secretion) differs by timing of etonogestrel implant insertion during the birth-hospitalization. We randomly assigned pregnant people to insertion at 0 to 2 hours (delivery room) vs 24 to 48 hours (delayed) postdelivery. Participants intended to breastfeed, desired a contraceptive implant for postpartum contraception, were fluent in English or Spanish, and had no allergy or contraindication to the etonogestrel implant. We collected demographic information and breastfeeding intentions at enrollment. Onset of lactogenesis stage II was assessed daily using a validated tool. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in time to lactogenesis stage II was defined as 12 hours in a per-protocol analysis. Additional electronic surveys collected data on breastfeeding and contraceptive continuation at 2 and 4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 95 participants; 77 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (n=38 in the delivery room group and n=39 in the delayed group) after excluding 18 because of withdrawing consent, changing contraceptive or breastfeeding plans, or failing to provide primary outcome data. A total of 69 participants were included in the as-treated analysis (n=35 delivery room, n=34 delayed); 8 participants who received the etonogestrel implant outside the protocol windows were excluded, and 2 participants from the delivery room group received the etonogestrel implant at 24 to 48 hours and were analyzed with the delayed group. Participants were similar between groups in age, gestational age, and previous breastfeeding experience. Delivery room insertion was noninferior to delayed birth-hospitalization insertion in time to lactogenesis stage II (delivery room [mean±standard deviation], 65±25 hours; delayed, 73±61 hours; mean difference, -9 hours; 95% confidence interval, -27 to 10). Onset of lactogenesis stage II by postpartum day 3 was not significantly different between the groups. Lactation failure occurred in 5.5% (n=2) participants in the delayed group. Ongoing breastfeeding rates did not differ between the groups, with decreasing rates of any/exclusive breastfeeding over the first postpartum year. Most people continued to use the implant at 12 months, which did not differ by group. CONCLUSION: Delivery room insertion of the contraceptive etonogestrel implant does not delay the onset of lactogenesis when compared with initiation later in the birth-hospitalization and therefore should be offered routinely as part of person-centered postpartum contraceptive counseling, regardless of breastfeeding intentions.

Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use among active-duty, female US Army soldiers.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception has been found to be effective at increasing interpregnancy intervals, reducing unintended pregnancies, and optimizing health outcomes for mothers and babies. Among female active-duty military service members, reproductive planning may be particularly important, yet little is known about postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use among active-duty soldiers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) quantify postpartum uptake of long-acting reversible contraception among active-duty female US Army soldiers and (2) identify demographic and military-specific characteristics associated with use. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used longitudinal data of all digitally recorded health encounters for active-duty US Army soldiers from 2014 to 2017. The servicewomen included in our analysis were aged 18 to 44 years with at least one delivery and a minimum of 4 months of total observed time postdelivery within the study period. We defined postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use as initiation of use within the delivery month or in the 3 calendar months following delivery and identified likely immediate postpartum initiation via the proxy of placement recorded during the same month as delivery. We then evaluated predictors of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 15,843 soldiers. Of those, 3162 (19.96%) initiated the use of long-acting reversible contraception in the month of or within the 3 months following delivery. Fewer than 5% of these women used immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Among women who initiated postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use, 1803 (57.0%) received an intrauterine device, 1328 (42.0%) received an etonogestrel implant, and 31 received both (0.98%). Soldiers of younger age, self-reported White race, and those who were married or previously married were more likely to initiate long-acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period. Race-stratified analyses showed that self-reported White women had the highest use rates overall. When compared with these women, the adjusted odds of postpartum use among self-reported Black and Asian or Pacific Islander women were 18% and 30% lower, respectively (both P<.001). There was also a trend of decreasing postpartum use with increasing age within each race group. Differences observed between age groups and race identities could partially be attributed to differential use of permanent contraception (sterilization), which was found to be significantly more prevalent among both women aged 30 years or older and among women who identified as Black. CONCLUSION: Among active-duty US Army servicewomen, 1 in 5 used postpartum long-acting reversible contraception, and fewer than 5% of these women used an immediate postpartum method. Within this population with universal healthcare coverage, we observed relatively low rates of use and significant differences in the uptake of effective postpartum long-acting contraceptive methods across self-reported race categories.

Treatment of unfavorable bleeding patterns in contraceptive implant users: a randomized clinical trial of curcumin.

BACKGROUND: Some users of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant experience bothersome bleeding, which can reduce contraceptive satisfaction and continuation. Few strategies exist to manage this bleeding. The exact mechanism of progestin-induced bleeding is unknown, but it is likely multifactorial (eg, impaired angiogenesis, "leaky" fragile vasculature, and inflammation). Curcumin, the active ingredient in turmeric, has anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic properties, which may make it a useful agent for implant-associated bothersome bleeding. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether curcumin decreases frequent or prolonged bleeding or spotting in contraceptive implant users. STUDY DESIGN: The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Here, etonogestrel implant users with frequent or prolonged bleeding or spotting were enrolled and randomized to either 600-mg Theracurmin HP (Immunovites, Las Vegas, NV) or placebo daily for 30 days. The term "frequent" was defined as ≥2 independent bleeding or spotting episodes, and the term "prolonged" was defined as ≥7 consecutive days of bleeding or spotting in a 30-day interval. Implant use was confirmed by clinical examination and negative gonorrhea and chlamydia and pregnancy tests. Enrolled participants initiated study treatment after 3 consecutive days of bleeding or spotting; if no bleeding or spotting occurred within 30 days of enrollment, the participants were withdrawn from the study. Study treatments were encapsulated to maintain a similar appearance. Participants used text messages to record daily bleeding patterns and study drug compliance. Bleeding was defined as a day that required the use of protection with a pad, tampon, or liner, and spotting was defined as a day with minimal blood loss that did not require the use of any protection. Our primary outcome was the total number of days without bleeding or spotting during the 30 days of study drug or placebo exposure. The secondary outcomes included total number of bleeding-free days, bleeding episodes, and satisfaction. A sample size of 22 per group provided 80% power at an alpha level of .05 to demonstrate a 6-day difference between groups. RESULTS: From February 2021 to November 2022, 58 individuals enrolled in the study with 54 participants (93%) completing 30 days of treatment (26 in the curcumin group and 28 in the placebo group). Of note, 1 individual in the curcumin arm did not experience a qualifying bleeding event and, thus, never initiated treatment and, per protocol, was withdrawn from the study. Participant characteristics did not differ between groups, including length of implant use at study enrollment (placebo, 521±305 days; curcumin, 419±264 days). The study groups did not differ concerning any bleeding-related outcome (mean days without bleeding or spotting: curcumin, 16.7±6.9; placebo, 17.5±4.8; P=.62; mean bleeding-free days: curcumin, 23.4±4.9; placebo, 22.4±4.5; P=.44; bleeding episodes: curcumin, 2.0±0.8; placebo, 2.1±0.8; P=.63). In addition, satisfaction with the implant as contraception and acceptability of bleeding over the study period did not differ by study group (P=.54 and P=.30, respectively). CONCLUSION: Daily use of curcumin did not improve bleeding patterns in users of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant experiencing frequent or prolonged bleeding patterns.

Acceptability of telemedicine for follow up after contraceptive implant initiation at an obstetrics and gynecologic training center.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has become a popular adjunct to in-person visits, including for family planning services. This study determined the proportion of clients participated in telemedicine services and the association between sociodemographic factors and telemedicine participation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The adverse effects within the first seven days post-insertion were also reported. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study considered data from all women initiating contraceptive implantation between June 2020 and August 2021 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Clients were offered the following two options for follow-up visits: in-person or communication via an online LINE® Official Account (LINE® OA), a free chat application widely used among the Thais. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between socio-demographic factors and telehealth usage. RESULTS: In total, 574 of 947 (60.6%) clients participated in telemedicine follow-up services during the period considered. A significant association between telemedicine usage and the following were observed: the peak of second wave COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand, using the period preceding the second wave as a reference [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.96)]; participants receiving governmental benefits for contraceptive implant payment (aOR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.86-5.60), and timing of contraceptive implant(s) initiation, using interval insertion as a reference for which aORs of postpartum and immediate postpartum insertions were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.43-0.90) and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.24-0.52), respectively. Significant ecchymosis at the insertion site was observed in 13.1% of participants. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the significance of telemedicine during the COVID-19 epidemic, particularly in facilitating contraceptive implant initiation. Our data show a significant increase in the uptake and utilization of telemedicine during the pandemic's peak. The data also shows that during the period of Thailand's second COVID-19 epidemic, government benefits for contraceptive implant payment, and the timing of contraceptive implant initiation, are significantly associated with telemedicine use. This finding supports the continued use of telemedicine in healthcare, particularly for services like family planning, where remote follow-ups can provide safe, efficient, and timely care.

Site necrosis at the insertion place of the single-rod subdermal contraceptive implant: report of five cases.

OBJECTIVE: Implant-site necrosis is a rare complication. We present a case-series of a necrosis as an adverse effect after the etonogestrel (ENG)-subdermal contraceptive implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five women with site necrosis after the ENG-implant placement and their clinical manifestations and treatments. RESULTS: Local pain was the main symptom, appearing within 35 days of placement. Outpatient multidisciplinary treatment was undertaken. Local debridement and implant removal was performed in four out of the five women. Time to complete healing varied from 45 days to 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment are essential to avoid severe aesthetic or functional damages and major life-threatening complications.

We presented five cases with necrosis at the ENG-implant site of placement in which we proposed an early diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment to avoid severe aesthetic or functional damages.

Googling long-acting reversible contraception: A scoping review examining the information available online about intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: The internet is an important source of health information, however, the quality of information about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC, including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants) found online is largely unknown. METHODS: A scoping review of webpages returned in a Google search was conducted. The first three pages of results were included if they were written in English and contained information about LARC. Results were critically reviewed and assessed using the DISCERN quality of health information tool. RESULTS: Of 778 results, 306 pages met the eligibility criteria. While most webpages provided key information about LARC, including location in the body, benefits, side effects and risks, the information provided varied considerably. Only half mentioned efficacy and many webpages did not provide information about the cost of insertion and removal, how and where to access the devices or how they work. Despite side effects being mentioned in more than three-quarters of webpages, the depth and specificity of these varied considerably and were often contradictory across different webpages. CONCLUSIONS: Most webpages provided medically accurate information to consumers; however, many did not include key information such as cost or how they work. Descriptions of side effects varied between webpages, and this may inhibit informed decision-making. SO WHAT?: Most people make decisions about what contraceptive method they might like to use before visiting a health care provider, and most will get this information from the internet. Providing comprehensive, medically accurate and consistent information about both IUDs and contraceptive implants is vital to support informed decision-making.

Adolescent/Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Experience from a Multisite Adolescent Medicine Collaborative.

OBJECTIVE: To report on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) experience and continuation rates in the Adolescent Medicine LARC Collaborative. STUDY DESIGN: LARC insertion data (682 implants and 681 intrauterine devices [IUDs]) were prospectively collected from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2019, across 3 Adolescent Medicine practices. Follow-up data through December 31, 2020, were included to ensure at least 1 year of follow-up of this cohort. Continuation rates were calculated at 1, 2, and 3 years, overall and by Adolescent Medicine site, as were descriptive statistics for LARC procedural complications and patient experience. RESULTS: Implant and IUD insertion complications were uncommon and largely self-limited, with no IUD-related uterine perforations. Uterine bleeding was the most frequently reported concern at follow-up (35% implant, 25% IUD), and a common reason for early device removal (45% of implant removals, 32% of IUD removals). IUD malposition or expulsion occurred following 6% of all insertions. The pooled implant continuation rate at 1 year was 87% (range, 86%-91% across sites; P = .63), 66% at 2 years (range, 62%-84%; P = .01), and 42% at 3 years (range, 36%-60%; P = .004). The pooled IUD continuation rate at 1 year was 88% (range, 87%-90% across sites; P = .82), 77% at 2 years (range, 76%-78%; P = .94), and 60% at 3 years (range, 57%-62%; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: LARC is successfully provided in Adolescent Medicine clinical settings, with continuation rates analogous to those of well-resourced clinical trials. Uterine bleeding after LARC insertion is common, making counselling imperative. Future analyses will assess whether the medical management of LARC-related nuisance bleeding improves continuation rates in our Adolescent Medicine patient population.

Update on incidence of inpatient tubal ligation and long-acting reversible contraception in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient insertion of long-acting reversible contraception and immediate postpartum tubal ligation allow women to initiate highly effective contraception before hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE: We measured rates of intrauterine device and contraceptive implant initiation and tubal ligations performed during delivery hospitalizations from 2016 to 2018 from a representative sample of US hospital discharges. STUDY DESIGN: We used the 2016 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample database, a 20% sample of all community hospital discharges in the United States, to identify delivery hospitalizations with concomitant intrauterine device insertion, contraceptive implant insertion, or tubal ligation. We performed weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between possible predictors (age, delivery mode, payer, geographic region, and year) and odds of long-acting reversible contraception and tubal ligation, and to compare characteristics of users. RESULTS: This sample included 2,216,638 discharges, representing 20% of 11,083,180 delivery hospitalizations across the United States. Intrauterine device insertion increased from 2.2 per 1000 deliveries (2016) to approximately 5.0 per 1000 deliveries (2018; P<.0001); implant insertion increased from 0.3 per 1000 deliveries (2016) to 2.5 per 1000 deliveries (2018; P<.0001); tubal ligation procedures decreased (64.2 to 62.1 per 1000 deliveries; P<.0001). Women who underwent a cesarean delivery had higher odds of having a tubal ligation than those who had a vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 8.83; 95% confidence interval, 8.73-8.97). Women aged <25 years had 7 times higher odds of receiving long-acting reversible contraception than of receiving tubal ligation (adjusted odds ratio, 7.38; 95% confidence interval, 6.90-7.90). Women with public insurance had almost 5 times the odds of receiving long-acting reversible contraception compared with those with commercial insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% confidence interval, 4.59-5.06). CONCLUSION: Rates of long-acting reversible contraception insertion continue to increase while the rates of inpatient postpartum tubal ligations slowly decline. Variations in patient characteristics are associated with receiving long-acting reversible contraception or tubal ligation.

Change of contraceptive preference after the free-LARC program for Thai teenagers.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the Thai government launched a free-of-charge long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) program for Thai female adolescents. However, its acceptance had not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to describe contraceptive use among women of reproductive age before and after the program was implemented. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out from the medical records of 9000 women of reproductive age, who attended the Family Planning Clinic at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between 2009 and 2018. The Chi-square test was used to compare the contraceptive methods administered before and after the program was implemented, and binary logistic regression was used to find the factors associated with implant use after completion of the program. RESULTS: Depot medroxy progesterone acetate (DMPA) injection was the most popular contraceptive method used among 40.9% of the women. The rates of subdermal implant use were increased significantly after the program was implemented (2.3-9.3%, p < 0.001). Implant use for adolescents aged less than 20 years increased from 2.6% to 56.4%, while DMPA was the most popular method used among adult women at 36.4%. Factors associated significantly with implant use after implement of the program included age of less than 20 years (aOR = 4.17 (CI: 1.84-9.44); p = 0.001) and nulliparity (aOR = 8.55 (CI: 3.77-19.39); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant increase in contraceptive implant use after the free-LARC program for adolescents had been applied. STATEMENT OF IMPLICATIONS: Contraceptive implant is the most effective hormonal reversible contraception. Its use rate is low among all age groups, but increased clearly after the free-of-charge program was applied for adolescents.

Migration of a subdermal contraceptive implant into a subsegmental pulmonary artery and etonogestrel serum concentration over time - a case report.

Nexplanon is a single-rod contraceptive implant that should be placed subdermally at the inner side of the upper nondominant arm approximately 8-10 cm above the medial epicondyle of the humerus. Insertion guidelines were recently updated to place of insertion superficial of the triceps muscle to lower risk of insertion into vessels and nerves. If migration however occurs, it is most commonly around the insertion site. Migration above 2 cm is rarely reported [Ismail H, Mansour D, Singh M. Migration of implanon®. BMJ Sexual Reproduct Health. 2006;32:157-159]. This is a case report of a 24-year-old caucasian woman who presented with an impalpable Nexplanon implant that was, with the help of chest radiography and CT, located in a posterior basal subsegmental pulmonary artery in the left lower lobe of the lung. An attempt to remove the contraceptive implant by endovascular approach was unsuccessful. The implant remains in situ. Etonogestrel and oestradiol concentrations were followed over time.

Evaluation of satisfaction with a model of structured contraceptive counseling: Results from the LOWE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intervention trials of structured contraceptive counseling have proved to increase use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) and decrease numbers of unintended pregnancies. However, these interventions have not been evaluated from a user perspective. This study aimed to evaluate both healthcare providers' and participants' satisfaction with an intervention used in a large trial in Sweden. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study on the intervention group from a cluster randomized trial conducted at 28 clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. Clinics were randomized (1:1 allocation ratio) to provide either structured contraceptive counseling (intervention) or standard contraceptive counseling (control). The intervention consisted of four parts; an educational video to be seen by the participant prior to contraceptive counseling, key questions to be asked by the healthcare provider, an effectiveness chart, and a box of contraceptive models. Eligible participants were 18 years or older, sexually active without a wish to conceive, and with the main purpose of contraceptive use being pregnancy prevention. Healthcare providers completed an electronic semi-structured survey to evaluate the intervention. This study analyses provider and participant satisfaction with the counseling material used in the intervention and if the intervention was found to be supportive in contraceptive counseling and contraceptive choice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03269357). RESULTS: Fourteen intervention clinics enrolled 658 participants from September 2017 to May 2019. Response rate among providers was 88.0% (55/62) and among participants 97.1% (639/658). Providers found the intervention to be supportive in their counseling. Each separate part of the intervention package received high ratings from both providers and participants. Participants found the educational video and the effectiveness chart to be more helpful than the box of contraceptive models in their contraceptive choice. Providers reported the time taken to complete the intervention outside the study to be time-neutral to standard counseling, and most providers wished to continue to use all parts of the intervention package. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention of structured contraceptive counseling had high provider and participant satisfaction. The structured counseling package could be used in several clinical settings to improve quality in contraceptive counseling and to enhance informed decision making about use of contraceptive methods.

Acceptability of immediate postpartum and post-abortion long-acting reversible contraception provision to adolescents: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods are safe for adolescents and provide the greatest assurance against rapid repeated pregnancy when inserted during the immediate postpartum (IPP) and immediate post-abortion (IPA) period. Despite increasing enthusiasm for IPP/IPA LARC insertion, adolescents' preferences and experiences have seldom been examined. The objective of this review was to examine the attitudes of adolescents (aged 10-19 years) towards IPP/IPA LARC, their experiences and perceptions around having an LARC device fitted IPP/IPA and the factors involved in decision-making to use, not use or discontinue IPP/IPA LARC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In January 2021, we searched seven bibliographic databases for original research articles published in English, from the year 2000. Studies of any design focused on IPP/IPA LARC were eligible for inclusion. Three of the authors assessed articles for eligibility and extracted data relevant to the outcomes of the review. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to assess methodological quality. Key themes emerging from the data were synthesized and reported narratively. RESULTS: We identified 10 relevant articles, four of which were entirely adolescent-focused. Only three addressed IPA LARC. IPP availability was important for ensuring access to LARC postpartum. Attitudes towards LARC IPP were associated with adolescents' sociodemographic characteristics and positive perceptions related to the long duration of action. Determinants of discontinuation and nonuse included poor-quality contraceptive counseling, intolerable side effects and subsequent distress, misconceptions about LARC safety IPP and the influence of partners and community on autonomy. No factors involved in IPA LARC decision-making were available. Limited evidence demonstrated that adolescents may favor contraceptive implants over intrauterine devices, and in certain contexts may face greater barriers to IPA LARC access than adult women do. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate insertion of LARC postpartum appears acceptable to adolescents who do not experience side effects and those with the opportunity to make autonomous contraception decisions. This important topic has been addressed in few studies involving an entirely adolescent population. Very limited evidence is available on IPA LARC. Further research on adolescents' lived experiences of IPP/IPA LARC access and use is necessary to inform the provision of person-centered care when assisting adolescents' contraceptive choice following pregnancy.

A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant.

BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancies (UIP) have a significant impact on health of women and the health budget of countries. Contraception is an effective way to prevent UIPs. The study objective was to collate evidence on clinical effectiveness of etonogestrel subdermal implant (ESI), continuation rate and side effect profile among eligible women of reproductive age group, as compared to levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and depot medroxy progesterone acetate injections; other types of contraceptive implants were excluded as comparators. METHODS: The protocol of the systematic review was registered in Prospero (registration number: CRD42018116580). MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane library and web of science were the electronic databases searched. A search strategy was formulated and studies from 1998 to 2019 were included. Clinical trial registries and grey literature search was done. Critical assessment of included studies was done using appropriate tools. A qualitative synthesis of included studies was done and a meta-analysis was conducted in RevMan software for continuation rates of ESI as compared to other long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) e.g. LNG IUS and Cu-IUD. RESULTS: The search yielded 23,545 studies. After excluding 467 duplicates, 23,078 titles were screened and 51 studies were included for the review. Eight of the 15 studies reporting clinical effectiveness reported 100% effectiveness and overall pearl index ranged from 0 to 1.4. One-year continuation rates ranged from 57-97%; 44-95% at the end of second year and 25-78% by 3 years of use. Abnormal menstruation was the most commonly reported side effect. There was no significant difference in bone mineral density at 1 year follow-up. The meta-analyses showed that odds ratio (OR) of 1-year continuation rate was 1.55 (1.36, 1.76) for LNG-IUS vs. ESI and 1.34 (1.13, 1.58) for copper-IUD vs. ESI; showing that continuation rates at the end of one-year were higher in LNG-IUS and copper-IUD as compared to ESI. CONCLUSION: ESI is clinically effective and safe contraceptive method to use, yet 1-year continuation rates are lower as compared to LNG-IUS and copper-IUD, mostly attributed to the disturbances in the menstruation.

Perceptions matter: Narratives of contraceptive implant robbery in Cape Town, South Africa.

Uptake of contraceptive implants has declined in South Africa since their introduction in 2014, with side effects and inadequate health provider training cited as primary contributors underlying a poor community perception of implants. In this paper we explore a theme that emerged unexpectedly during analysis of our research in Cape Town that may be an additional factor in this decline: narratives of women being assaulted by robbers who physically remove the implants for smoking as drugs. Narratives were described consistently across interviews and focus groups with youth (aged 18-24 years) and in interviews with health providers, with six participants (two young people, four health providers) sharing personal experiences of robbery. While there was a range of perspectives on whether narratives are based on real experiences or are myths, there was strong consensus that narratives of implant robbery may be influencing women's decisions around implant use in Cape Town. This is a potent example of how perceptions of new products can affect uptake and offers important lessons for implementers to reflect on in planning for rollout of other health technologies.

An exploratory study on the association of lifestyle factors with serum etonogestrel concentrations among contraceptive implant users.

PURPOSE: To explore how diet and exercise habits associate with serum etonogestrel concentrations among contraceptive implant users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of healthy, reproductive-age women using etonogestrel implants. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03092037. We assessed diet and exercise habits with two validated surveys: Healthy Eating Vital Signs and the Stanford Brief Activity Survey. Participants previously had their serum etonogestrel concentrations measured using a validated liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry assay. We then used linear modelling to test for associations between survey responses and serum etonogestrel concentrations. RESULTS: Among 129 participants, diet and exercise habits had no significant associations with serum etonogestrel concentrations (p = 0.22-0.72), with inconsistent effects found for increased caloric intake and sedentary lifestyle. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study found no significant effect of diet or exercise habits on steady-state pharmacokinetics among contraceptive implant users. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03092037.