Dapagliflozin vs. metolazone in heart failure resistant to loop diuretics.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To examine the decongestive effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin compared to the thiazide-like diuretic metolazone in patients hospitalized for heart failure and resistant to treatment with intravenous furosemide. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-centre, open-label, randomized, and active-comparator trial. Patients were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or metolazone 5-10 mg once daily for a 3-day treatment period, with follow-up for primary and secondary endpoints until day 5 (96 h). The primary endpoint was a diuretic effect, assessed by change in weight (kg). Secondary endpoints included a change in pulmonary congestion (lung ultrasound), loop diuretic efficiency (weight change per 40 mg of furosemide), and a volume assessment score. 61 patients were randomized. The mean (±standard deviation) cumulative dose of furosemide at 96 h was 977 (±492) mg in the dapagliflozin group and 704 (±428) mg in patients assigned to metolazone. The mean (±standard deviation) decrease in weight at 96 h was 3.0 (2.5) kg with dapagliflozin compared to 3.6 (2.0) kg with metolazone [mean difference 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12,1.41 kg; P = 0.11]. Loop diuretic efficiency was less with dapagliflozin than with metolazone [mean 0.15 (0.12) vs. 0.25 (0.19); difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.17,0.01 kg; P = 0.10]. Changes in pulmonary congestion and volume assessment score were similar between treatments. Decreases in plasma sodium and potassium and increases in urea and creatinine were smaller with dapagliflozin than with metolazone. Serious adverse events were similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure and loop diuretic resistance, dapagliflozin was not more effective at relieving congestion than metolazone. Patients assigned to dapagliflozin received a larger cumulative dose of furosemide but experienced less biochemical upset than those assigned to metolazone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04860011.

Treatment with Rasburicase in Hospitalized Patients with Cardiorenal Syndrome: Old Treatment, New Scenario.

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) involves joint dysfunction of the heart and kidney. Acute forms share biochemical alterations like hyperuricaemia (HU) with tumour lysis syndrome (TLS). The mainstay treatment of acute CRS with systemic overload is diuretics, but rasburicase is used in TLS to prevent and treat hyperuricaemia. An observational, retrospective study was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of a single dose of rasburicase in hospitalized patients with cardiorenal syndrome, worsening renal function and uric acid levels above 9 mg/dL. Rasburicase improved diuresis and systemic congestion in the 35 patients included. A total of 86% of patients did not need to undergo RRT, and early withdrawal was possible in the remaining five. Creatinine (Cr) decreased after treatment with rasburicase from a peak of 3.6 ± 1.27 to 1.79 ± 0.83 mg/dL, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved from 17 ± 8 to 41 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.0001). The levels of N-terminal type B Brain Natriuretic Peptide (Nt-ProBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were also significantly reduced. No relevant adverse events were detected. Our results show that early treatment with a dose of rasburicase in patients with CRS and severe HU is effective to improve renal function and systemic congestion, avoiding the need for sustained extrarenal clearance, regardless of comorbidities and ventricular function.

Il-6 and UGT1A1 variations may related to furosemide resistance in heart failure patients.

Furosemide is a diuretic and is used for the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF). It has been found that in some HF patients, the drug does not treat patients efficiently. This condition is named as furosemide resistance. In this study, it is aimed to investigate the relationship between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1) and interleukine-6 (IL-6) variations with furosemide resistance in HF patients. Sixty HF patients using furosemide (patient group) and 30 healthy individuals (control group) were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two subgroups as non-responders (furosemide resistant) group (n = 30) and the responders (non-resistant) group (n = 30) according to the presence of furosemide resistance (n = 30). Variations in the first exon of UGT1A1 and rs1800795 and rs1800796 variations in IL-6 were analyzed by direct sequencing and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively. The effects of newly detected mutations on 3-D protein structure were analyzed by in silico analysis. At the end of the study, 11 variations were detected in UGT1A1, of which nine of them are novel and eight of them cause amino acid change. Also, rs1800795 and rs1800796 variations were detected in all the groups. When patient and control groups were compared with each other, rs1800796 mutation in IL-6 was found statistically high in the patient group (p = 0.027). When the three groups were compared with each other, similarly, rs1800796 mutation in IL-6 was found statistically high in the non-responders group (p = 0.043). When allele distributions were compared between the patient and control groups, the C allele of rs1800795 mutation in IL-6 was found statistically high in the patient group (p = 0.032). When allele distributions were compared between the three groups, 55T-insertion in UGT1A1 was found statistically high in the non-responders group (p = 0.017). According to in silico analysis results, two variations were found deleterious and six variations were detected as probably damaging to protein functions. Our study may contribute to the elucidation of pharmacogenetic features (drug response-gene relationship) and the development of individual-specific treatment strategies in HF patients using furosemide.

Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy versus large-volume paracentesis for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites: A multicenter prospective observational study.

AIM: Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) and large-volume paracentesis (LVP) with albumin infusion are useful for managing refractory ascites (RA). However, it remains unclear which therapy is more effective in patients with cirrhosis with RA. METHODS: From June 2018 to March 2022, 25 patients with RA treated with CART or LVP with albumin infusion were enrolled in this multicenter prospective observational study to investigate the number of abdominal paracenteses, albumin preparations used, and drainage volume during an 8-week observation period. RESULTS: Among all patients at entry (median age, 63 years; 52% men; 60% Child-Pugh B and 40% Child-Pugh C), 92% were treated with furosemide (median, 20 mg/day), 92% with spironolactone (25 mg/day), and all with tolvaptan (7.5 mg/day). Patients with RA had a poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and prominent ascites-related symptoms. Four of the 20 eligible patients were treated with CART, 11 with LVP with albumin infusion, and five with their combination. The median number of paracenteses, total drainage volume, and albumin infusions were 1.5, 7.4 L, and 0, respectively, in the CART group; 5.0, 22.0 L, and 5.0, respectively, in the LVP group; and 5.0, 30.0 L, and 5.0, respectively in their combination group. The treatment effects did not differ significantly among the three groups regarding weight loss, liver function, renal function, electrolytes, and HRQOL. However, patients treated with CART had fewer paracenteses and albumin infusions than those treated with LVP. CONCLUSIONS: CART and LVP have comparable therapeutic efficacy for RA in patients with cirrhosis.

[Connotation of Shenqi Pills based on severe cases in cardiovascular care unit and modern pathophysiological mechanism and application of Shenqi Pills for heart failure, renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diuretic resistance in critical care medicine].

Shenqi Pills, first recorded in Essentials from the Golden Cabinet(Jin Kui Yao Lue) from ZHANG Zhong-jing in Han dynasty, have the effect of warming and tonifying the kidney Qi and are mainly used for the treatment of insufficiency of kidney Qi and kidney Yang. According to modern medicine, kidney Qi involves heart function, kidney function, immune function, and so on. The clinical indications of Shenqi Pills include kidney deficiency, abnormal fluid, and abnormal urination, and the last one is classified into little urine, much urine, and dysuria. In clinical settings, Shenqi Pills can be applied for the treatment of heart failure, renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diuretic resistance, as well as endocrine, urological, orthopedic, and other chronic degenerative diseases. Shenqi Pills are ideal prescriptions for the weak constitution and emergency treatment. It is of great value and significance to carry out in-depth research on the connotation of the classic articles by integrating TCM and western medicine based on "pathogenesis combined with pathology and drug properties combined with pharmacology".

Diuretics in States of Volume Overload: Core Curriculum 2022.

Volume overload, defined as excess total body sodium and water with expansion of extracellular fluid volume, characterizes common disorders such as congestive heart failure, end-stage liver disease, chronic kidney disease, and nephrotic syndrome. Diuretics are the cornerstone of therapy for volume overload and comprise several classes whose mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, indications, and adverse effects are essential principles of nephrology. Loop diuretics are typically the first-line treatment in the management of hypervolemia, with additional drug classes indicated in cases of diuretic resistance and electrolyte or acid-base disorders. Separately, clinical trials highlight improved outcomes in some states of volume overload, such as loop diuretics and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure. Resistance to diuretics is a frequent, multifactorial clinical challenge that requires creative and physiology-based solutions. In this installment of AJKD's Core Curriculum in Nephrology, we discuss the pharmacology and therapeutic use of diuretics in states of volume overload and strategies to overcome diuretic resistance.

Multinephron Segment Diuretic Therapy to Overcome Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The concept of multinephron segment diuretic therapy (MSDT) has been recommended in severe diuretic resistance with only expert opinion and case-level evidence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of MSDT, combining 4 diuretic classes, in acute heart failure (AHF) complicated by diuretic resistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients hospitalized with AHF at a single medical center who received MSDT, including concomitant carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, loop, thiazide, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist diuretics. Subjects served as their own controls with efficacy evaluated as urine output and weight change before and after MSDT. Serum chemistries, renal replacement therapies, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated for safety. Patients with severe diuretic resistance before MSDT were analyzed as a subcohort. A total of 167 patients with AHF and diuretic resistance received MSDT. MSDT was associated with increased median 24-hour urine output in the first day of therapy compared with the previous day (2.16 L [0.95-4.14 L] to 3.08 L [1.74-4.86 L], P = .003) in the total cohort and in the Severe diuretic resistance cohort (0.91 L [0.43-1.43 L] to 2.08 L [1.13-3.96 L], P < .001). The median cumulative weight loss at day 7 or discharge was -7.4 kg (-15.3 to -3.4 kg) (P = .02). Neither serum sodium, chloride, potassium, bicarbonate, or creatinine changed significantly relative to baseline (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In an AHF cohort with diuretic resistance, MSDT was associated with increased diuresis without changes in serum chemistries or kidney function. Prospective studies of MSDT in AHF and diuretic resistance are warranted.

Impact of Loop Diuretic on Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Loop diuretics are the cornerstone of the treatment of congestion in heart failure patients. The manuscript aims to summarize the most updated information regarding the use of loop diuretics in heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Diuretic response can be highly variable between patients and needs to be carefully evaluated during and after the hospitalization. Diuretic resistance can lead to residual congestion which affects prognosis and can be difficult to detect. The effect of loop diuretics on long-term prognosis remains uncertain but patients with advanced heart failure typically have renal dysfunction and are more inclined to develop loop diuretic resistance, which may lead to an incomplete decongestion and thus to a worse prognosis. Loop diuretics are the most potent diuretics available and their use is recommended in order to alleviate symptoms, improve exercise capacity, and reduce hospitalizations in patients with heart failure. Their use should be limited to the lowest dose necessary to maintain euvolemia because a low dose does not increase the risk of decompensation but reduce the risk of adverse effects and allow the up-titration of disease-modifying drugs.

Induction of renal tumor necrosis factor-α and other autacoids and the beneficial effects of hypertonic saline in acute decompensated heart failure.

Although administration of hypertonic saline (HSS) in combination with diuretics has yielded improved weight loss, preservation of renal function, and reduction in hospitalization time in the clinical setting of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), the mechanisms that underlie these beneficial effects remain unclear and additional studies are needed before this approach can be adopted on a more consistent basis. As high salt conditions stimulate the production of several renal autacoids that exhibit natriuretic effects, renal physiologists can contribute to the understanding of mechanisms by which HSS leads to increased diuresis both as an individual therapy as well as in combination with loop diuretics. For instance, since HSS increases TNF-α production by proximal tubule and thick ascending limb of Henle's loop epithelial cells, this article is aimed at highlighting how the effects of TNF-α produced by these cell types may contribute to the beneficial effects of HSS in patients with ADHF. Although TNF-α produced by infiltrating macrophages and T cells exacerbates and attenuates renal damage, respectively, production of this cytokine within the tubular compartment of the kidney functions as an intrinsic regulator of blood pressure and Na+ homeostasis via mechanisms along the nephron related to inhibition of Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter isoform 2 activity and angiotensinogen expression. Thus, in the clinical setting of ADHF and hyponatremia, induction of TNF-α production along the nephron by administration of HSS may attenuate Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter isoform 2 activity and angiotensinogen expression as part of a mechanism that prevents excessive Na+ reabsorption in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop, thereby mitigating volume overload.

Peritoneal dialysis in heart failure: focus on kidney and ventricular dysfunction.

Heart failure is a significant health problem worldwide. Despite all the new therapies available nowadays, many patients will reach advanced stages of the disease. Diuretic resistance, kidney dysfunction, and refractory congestion, all highly prevalent in advanced heart failure, frequently complicate the situation, making it more challenging to manage. Ultrafiltration through hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis can be alternative options to treat fluid overload. Peritoneal dialysis has gained increased interest in the last decades due to several benefits such as functional class improvement, reduction in hospital admissions, improvement in quality of life, and even a reduction in mortality shown by numerous cohort studies. However, the majority of the studies were observational and with a limited number of patients. In addition, the optimal timing for the initiation of this type of therapy and the subgroup of patients who would benefit the most from it is unknown. Hence, randomized controlled trials in this subject are urgently needed. We aim to review the contemporary evidence of peritoneal dialysis in patients with heart failure and diuretic resistance across the spectrum of ventricular dysfunction and degree of renal dysfunction.

Loop diuretic resistance complicating acute heart failure.

Acute heart failure hospitalizations complicated by diuretic resistance are associated with worse outcomes. Yet, quantification of the frequency and accompanying risk from loop diuretic resistance is limited by the absence of a comprehensive definition with universal clinical application. Herein, we outline limitations of the current metrics used to identify and define diuretic resistance. We discuss the best available methods to identify and prognosticate outcomes in diuretic resistance. We propose a mechanism-based classification system of diuretic resistance by anatomical location as follows: pre-nephron resistance, pre-loop of Henle resistance, loop of Henle resistance, and post-loop of Henle resistance. Within this paradigm, we compare and contrast historical beliefs of resistance mechanisms with current literature specific to patients with heart failure. We recommend a treatment pathway to restore diuretic efficacy with a literature review of the various combination diuretic strategies and ongoing clinical trials that may impact current best practices.

Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome in Heart Failure: from Dogmas to Advances.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize our current understanding and management strategies of acute cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). RECENT FINDINGS: The definition of acute CRS remains debated, in part due to the lack of reliable insights into salt and water handling of the kidneys beyond impairment in glomerular filtration. Protocolized use of loop diuretics to ensure adequate delivery to their target of action, as well as segmental tubular blockade with adjunctive use of thiazide diuretics, acetazolamide, amiloride, or sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, may result in more effective natriuresis in patients with acute CRS who exhibit diuretic resistance. Other strategies, such as modulating renal sodium avidity with the use of hypertonic saline, reduction of intra-abdominal pressure, or device-based salt and volume removal, are promising and warrant further investigation. Acute CRS remains a significant contributor of morbidity and mortality for the acute heart failure population. New strategies have challenged current dogmas in our understanding of its pathophysiology, which may lead to potential new treatment approaches.

Very Early Diuretic Response After Admission for Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: In hospitalized heart failure patients, a poor diuretic response (DR) during the first days of hospital admission is associated with worse outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether DR in the first hours has similar prognostic value. Moreover, data on the sequential change in DR during hospital admission are lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: DR (urine output per 40-mg furosemide-equivalent diuretics dose) was measured from 0 to 6 hours (DR6), 6 to 48 hours (DR6-48), and 0 to 48 hours (DR48) of the patient's emergency department (ED) arrival in 1551 patients with acute heart failure (AHF; mean age 78 years, 56% male, and 48% de novo patients with heart failure). Patients with a poor DR within the first 6 hours were older age, had worse renal function, and were already on diuretic treatment before admission. DR6 was only weakly correlated with DR6-48 (Spearman's rho = 0.273; P < .001). DR6, DR6-48, and DR48 were all significantly associated with 60-day mortality independent of other prognostic factors. DR6 and DR48 showed comparable prognostic ability. However, the model combining DR6 with DR6-48 significantly exceeded both DR6 (net reclassification improvement 0.249; P = .032) and DR48 (net reclassification improvement 0.287; P = 0.025) with regard to 60-day mortality prediction. CONCLUSIONS: DR measured within the first 6 hours of ED arrival and DR measured during the first 48 hours in patients with AHF have similar prognostic value, although they were moderately correlated. Changes in DR over time provide additional prognostic information.

Treatment of Diuretic Resistance with a Novel Percutaneous Blood Flow Regulator: Concept and Initial Experience.

Diuretic resistance in acute heart failure is a common clinical problem, and it is associated with adverse outcomes. Effective therapies are still lacking. The Doraya catheter, a temporary intravenous flow regulator placed in the inferior vena cava below the level of the renal veins, is a novel device designed to target renal and cardiac congestion, thereby improving diuretic response. A first-in-man clinical study is currently ongoing.

Loop diuretics in chronic heart failure: how to manage congestion?

Loop diuretics remain the cornerstone of congestion management in contemporary chronic heart failure care. However, their use is not supported by high quality data, and there is doubt about the safety in the outpatient heart failure setting. Still, congestion is related to a worse outcome, and there is general consensus among experts that congestion should not be tolerated in heart failure patients. Recommendations in international guidelines, regarding decongestion strategies in chronic heart failure, are limited. Thus, there is an emerging need for clinical decision-making support about the best strategy for using loop diuretics and decongestion in the chronic setting. The present review provides a comprehensive overview over the evidence of chronic loop diuretic use. Strategies for the assessment of congestion in the outpatient setting and decongestion algorithm are provided to assist health care specialists in delivering high-quality heart failure care.

Diuretic Resistance in Cardio-Nephrology: Role of Pharmacokinetics, Hypochloremia, and Kidney Remodeling.

BACKGROUND: Diuretic resistance is among the most challenging problems that the cardio-nephrologist must address in daily clinical practice, with a considerable burden on hospital admissions and health care costs. Indeed, loop diuretics are the first-line therapy to overcome fluid overload in heart failure patients. The pathophysiological mechanisms of fluid and sodium retention are complex and depend on several neuro-hormonal signals mainly acting on sodium reabsorption along the renal tubule. Consequently, doses and administration modalities of diuretics must be carefully tailored to patients in order to overcome under- or overtreatment. The frequent and tricky development of diuretic resistance depends in part on post-diuretic sodium retention, reduced tubular secretion of the drug, and reduced sodium/chloride sensing. Sodium and chloride depletions have been recently shown to be major factors mediating these processes. Aquaretics and high-saline infusions have been recently suggested in cases of hyponatremic conditions. This review discusses the limitations and strengths of these approaches. SUMMARY: Long-term diuretic use may lead to diuretic resistance in cardio-renal syndromes. To overcome this complication intravenous administration of loop diuretics and a combination of different diuretic classes have been proposed. In the presence of hyponatremia, high-saline solutions in addition to loop diuretics might be beneficial, whereas aquaretics require caution to avoid overcorrection. Key Messages: Diuretic resistance is a central theme for cardio-renal syndromes. Hyponatremia and hypochloremia may be part of the mechanisms for diuretic resistance. Aquaretics and high-saline solutions have been proposed as possible new therapeutic solutions.

Different diuretic properties between tolvaptan and furosemide in congestive heart failure patients with diuretic resistance and renal impairment: a subanalysis of the K-STAR.

We attempted to identify the difference in diuretic properties between tolvaptan (TLV) and furosemide (FUR) in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with loop diuretic resistance and renal impairment. We investigated 81 CHF patients with loop diuretic treatment and renal impairment included in t he Kanagawa Aquaresis Investigators Trial of Tolvaptan on Heart Failure Patients with Renal Impairment (K-STAR). Predictive baseline factors and their changes during treatment periods were analyzed for correlation with percentage change in urine volume (%ΔUV) after additive introduction of TLV or increasing doses of FUR. Higher urine osmolality at baseline (ß = 0.355; p = 0.033) in the TLV group and a lower ratio of blood urea nitrogen to serum creatinine (BUN/Cr, ß = - 0.405; p = 0.020) in the FUR group were predictive of higher %ΔUV. Higher Δfree-water clearance (ß = 0.667; p < 0.0001) in the TLV group, and higher %ΔBUN/Cr (ß = 0.344; p = 0.030), higher %Δurine sodium concentration (ß = 0.337; p = 0.037), and lower %Δstroke volume (ß = - 0.390; p = 0.017) in the FUR group were correlated with %ΔUV. In conclusion, baseline urine osmolality and change in free-water clearance with additive introduction of TLV and a changing ratio of BUN/Cr with increasing doses of FUR were identified as key clinical parameters related to diuretic response.Trial registration UMIN000009201.

Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diuretic resistance (DR) occurs along a spectrum of relative severity and contributes to worsening of acute heart failure (AHF) during an inpatient stay. This review gives an overview of mechanisms of DR with a focus on loop diuretics and summarizes the current literature regarding the prognostic value of diuretic efficiency and predictors of natriuretic response in AHF. RECENT FINDINGS: The pharmacokinetics of diuretics are impaired in chronic heart failure, but little is known about mechanisms of DR in AHF. Almost all diuresis after administration of a loop diuretic dose occurs in the first few hours after administration and within-dose DR can develop. Recent studies suggest that DR at the level of the nephron may be more important than defects in diuretic delivery to the tubule. Because loop diuretics induce natriuresis, urine sodium (UNa) concentration may serve as a functional, physiological, and direct measure for diuretic responsiveness to a given loop diuretic dose. Identifying and targeting individuals with DR for more aggressive, tailored therapy represents an important opportunity to improve outcomes. A better understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of DR in AHF is needed to identify additional biomarkers and guide future trials and therapies.

Oral Metolazone Versus Intravenous Chlorothiazide as an Adjunct to Loop Diuretics for Diuresis in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Background: Thiazide diuretics are often utilized to overcome loop diuretic resistance when treating acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). In addition to a large cost advantage, several pharmacokinetic advantages exist when administering oral metolazone (MTZ) compared with intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide (CTZ), yet many providers are reluctant to utilize an oral formulation to treat ADHF. The purpose of this study was to compare the increase in 24-hour total urine output (UOP) after adding MTZ or CTZ to IV loop diuretics (LD) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and Results: From September 2013 to August 2016, 1002 patients admitted for ADHF received either MTZ or CTZ in addition to LD. Patients were excluded for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 469), <24-hour LD or UOP data prior to drug initiation (n = 129), or low dose MTZ/CTZ (n = 91). A total of 168 patients were included with 64% receiving CTZ. No significant difference was observed between the increase in 24-hour total UOP after MTZ or CTZ initiation (1458 [514, 2401] mL vs 1820 [890, 2750] mL, P = .251). Conclusions: Both MTZ and CTZ similarly increased UOP when utilized as an adjunct to IV LD. These results suggest that while thiazide agents can substantially increase UOP in ADHF patients with HFrEF, MTZ and CTZ have comparable effects.

Effects of tolvaptan on urine output in hospitalized heart failure patients with hypoalbuminemia or proteinuria.

Hypoalbuminemia is an independent prognostic factor in hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Hypoalbuminemia or proteinuria is related to resistance to loop diuretics. Tolvaptan is an oral non-peptide, competitive antagonist of vasopressin receptor-2. It has been used for the treatment of volume overload in HHF patients in several Asian countries. Several studies have demonstrated marked improvement in congestion in HHF patients. However, whether tolvaptan is useful for HHF patients with hypoalbuminemia or proteinuria (both of which are related to resistance to loop diuretics) has not been clarified. We examined the diuretic response to tolvaptan in HHF patients with hypoalbuminemia or proteinuria. We defined hypoalbuminemia as a serum level of albumin < 2.6 g/dl. Fifty-one HHF patients who received additional tolvaptan upon therapies with loop diuretics were divided into the hypoalbuminemia group (n = 24) or control group (n = 27). The changes in urine output per day were not different between the two groups [610 (range 100-1032); 742 (505-1247) ml, P = 0.313]. There was no difference in diuretic responses between patients with and without proteinuria. The serum level of albumin did not correlate with changes in urine output per day after tolvaptan treatment (P = 0.276, r = 0.156). Thus, additional administration of tolvaptan elicited a good diuretic response in HHF patients with hypoalbuminemia or proteinuria. These data suggest that tolvaptan might be beneficial for such HHF patients.