Complications after Heller myotomy in children: a national multicenter study on the impact of prior endoscopic dilatation and identification of risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Although esophageal achalasia has been historically treated by Heller myotomy, endoscopic esophageal dilatations are nowadays often the first-line treatment in children. The aim was to assess whether performing an endoscopic dilatation before a Heller myotomy is associated with higher risks of esophageal perforation in children. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study was performed, including children that underwent a Heller myotomy (2000-2022, 10 centers). Two groups were compared based on the history of previous dilatation before myotomy. Outcomes esophageal perforation (intra-operative or secondary) and post-operative complications requiring surgery (Clavien-Dindo III). Statistics Comparisons using contingency tables or Kruskal-Wallis when appropriate. Statistical significance: p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: A Heller myotomy was performed in 77 children (median age: 11.8 years), with prior endoscopic dilatation in 53% (n = 41). A laparoscopic approach was used in 90%, with associated fundoplication in 95%. Esophageal perforation occurred in 19% of children (n = 15), including 12 patients with intra-operative mucosal tear and 3 with post-operative complications related to an unnoticed esophageal perforation. Previous endoscopic dilatation did not increase the risk of esophageal perforation (22% vs 17%, OR: 1.4, 95%CI: 0.43-4.69). Post-operative complications occurred in 8% (n = 6), with similar rates regardless of prior endoscopic dilatation. Intra-operative mucosal tear was the only risk factor for post-operative complications, increasing the risk of complications from 5 to 25% (OR: 6.89, 95%CI: 1.38-31.87). CONCLUSIONS: Prior endoscopic dilatations did not increase the risk of esophageal perforation or postoperative complications of Heller myotomy in this cohort of children with achalasia. Mucosal tear was identified as a risk factor for post-operative complications.

Esophageal Self-Dilation in Benign Refractory Esophageal Strictures: Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial and a Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with benign esophageal strictures may not maintain a response to endoscopic dilation, stenting, incisional or injectional therapies. For patients with these refractory esophageal strictures, esophageal self-dilation therapy (ESDT), performed to maintain luminal patency, may provide persistent symptomatic benefit while reducing patients' reliance on healthcare services and the risk associated with repeated endoscopic procedures. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDST in a randomized controlled trial and prospective observational study. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures were recruited at two esophageal clinics between November 2018 and June 2021. Twelve patients participated in the randomized trial and 13 in the prospective observational study. The number of endoscopic dilations, impact of therapy on dysphagia, adverse events, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: In the randomized study, 50% of patients performing ESDT and 100% of controls required endoscopic dilation during follow-up (P = 0.02). In the observational study, the median (IQR) number of endoscopic dilations fell from 7 [7-10] in the 6 months prior to commencing ESDT to 1 [0-2] in the 6 months after (P < 0.0001). Most patients (22/25) were able to learn self-dilation. Few serious adverse events were noted. Dysphagia severity remained unchanged or improved. CONCLUSIONS: ESDT appears to be a safe effective therapy for benign esophageal strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03738566.

Predictors of favorable outcome after pyloroplasty for gastroparesis: should response to pyloric dilation or Botox injection be used as a marker of surgical outcome?

INTRODUCTION: Pyloroplasty and gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) are effective surgeries for gastroparesis. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of pyloroplasty and G-POEM in patients with gastroparesis and determine factors associated with favorable outcome. The secondary aim was to assess the utility of clinical response to preoperative pyloric dilation or botulinum toxin injection (Botox) on surgical outcome, a factor conventionally used as a favorable marker. METHODS: There were 204 patients who underwent pyloroplasty (n = 177) or G-POEM (n = 27) for gastroparesis at our institution from 2014 to 2021. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed to assess their impact on surgical outcome. A subgroup of patients who had pyloric dilation or Botox injection were assessed separately. Favorable outcome was defined as patient reported complete resolution of the predominant gastroparesis symptom. RESULTS: Favorable outcome was achieved in 78.4% of patients (pyloroplasty: 79.7% and G-POEM: 70.4%, p = 0.274). Among 61 patients where pre- and postoperative gastric emptying studies (GES) were available, mean 4-hour retention significantly improved from 33.5 to 15.0% (p < 0.001) and 77.0% of patients achieved normalization. Favorable outcome was not significantly impacted by etiology of gastroparesis (p = 0.120), GERD (p = 0.518), or primary gastroparesis symptom (p = 0.244). Age ≥ 40 was a significant predictor of favorable surgical outcome on multivariate analysis [OR: 2.476 (1.224-5.008), p = 0.012]. Among the patients who had preoperative dilation (n = 82) or Botox injection (n = 46), response to these interventions was not a predictor of favorable surgical outcome (p = 0.192 and 0.979, respectively). However, preoperative Botox injection, regardless of response to injection, was associated with favorable surgical outcome [OR: 3.205 (CI 1.105-9.299), p = 0.032]. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic improvement after pyloroplasty or G-POEM is independent of etiology of gastroparesis, GERD, and primary symptom. Response to dilation or Botox are not markers of response to surgery. However, patients who receive Botox are 3.2 times more likely to improve postoperatively.

Intensive endoscopic therapy for untreated cervical anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy cause significant disease burden. We aimed to study the technical feasibility and safety of intensive endoscopic therapy. METHODS: In this pilot study, we included 15 patients with an untreated benign cervical anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Intensive endoscopic therapy comprised three endoscopic modalities: in- and excision using a needle-knife, intralesional steroid injections and bougie dilation. In two endoscopic procedures, the stricture was dilated up to a luminal diameter of 18 mm. Patients were followed up to 6 months. RESULTS: A luminal diameter of 18 mm was achieved in 13 of 15 patients (87%) after two endoscopic procedures. No major adverse events related to the investigational treatment occurred. Median dysphagia scores significantly improved from 2 (IQR, interquartile range, 2-3) at baseline to 0 (IQR 0-1) after 14 days (p < 0.001). Eleven (73%) patients developed recurrent symptoms of dysphagia requiring a median of 1 (IQR 0-3) additional endoscopic dilation procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving a luminal diameter of 18 mm in two procedures with intensive endoscopic therapy was technically feasible and effective in reducing dysphagia rapidly in patients with a cervical anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. No major adverse events related to the investigational treatment were observed.

Need for frequent dilations after magnetic sphincter augmentation: an assessment of associated factors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is the most common complaint after magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA), with nearly one-third of patients requiring at least one dilation following MSA. A subset of patients require frequent dilations, but there is a paucity of data on the characteristics of this population. This study aimed to identify predictors of the need for frequent dilations within the first year after implant and to assess these patients' outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent MSA over an 8-year period. Frequent dilations were defined as 2 or more dilations within 1 year of surgery. Patients completed baseline and 1-year postoperative GERD-HRQL questionnaires and objective physiology testing. Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, and objective testing data were compared between patients who did and did not require frequent dilations. RESULTS: A total of 697 (62.7% female) patients underwent MSA, with 62 (8.9%) patients requiring frequent dilation. At a mean (SD) of 12.3 (3.4) months follow-up, the frequent dilation group had higher median GERD-HRQL total scores (21.0 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), PPI use (20.8% vs.10.1%, p = 0.023), dissatisfaction (46.7% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001), and device removal (25.8% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001) rates. Acid normalization was comparable (p = 0.997). Independent predictors of frequent dilation included preoperative odynophagia (OR 2.85; p = 0.001), IRP > 15 mmHg (OR 2.88; p = 0.006), and > 30% incomplete bolus clearance (OR 1.94; p = 0.004). At a mean (SD) of 15.7 (10.7) months, 28 (45.1%) patients underwent device removal after frequent dilation. Independent predictors of device removal after frequent dilation within 5 years of surgery were preoperative odynophagia (OR 7.18; p = 0.042), LES resting pressure > 45 mmHg (OR 28.5; p = 0.005), and ≥ 10% failed swallows (OR 23.5; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The need for frequent dilations after MSA is a marker for poor symptom control, dissatisfaction, and device removal. Patients with preoperative odynophagia, high LES pressures, and poor esophageal motility should be counseled of their risk for these poor outcomes.

Endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: An investigation of novel endoscopic treatment in multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The standard therapies for benign gastrointestinal stenosis are endoscopic balloon dilation or surgery; each have their advantages and disadvantages. In contrast, radial incision and cutting (RIC) is a novel approach for such stenosis. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of RIC. METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients with benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract developed by various causes and conducted RIC. We evaluated the re-intervention free rate 52 weeks after RIC, technical success rate, adverse events, procedure time, and improvement of symptoms using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: We performed 20 sessions of first RIC for 20 lesions and seven sessions of additional RIC due to re-stenosis. The cumulative re-intervention-free survival rate 52 weeks after the first RIC was 55.8%. The technical success rate of the first RIC was 100% (20/20) while that of the additional RIC was 85.7% (6/7). One case developed perforation during the additional RIC and urgent surgery was performed. The additional RIC tended to show worse results in adverse events and procedure time compared with the first RIC. The patients' symptoms including abdominal bloating and dyschezia were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Although RIC demonstrated a higher technical success rate for lower gastrointestinal stricture and subsequent improvement of patient symptoms, several issues including preventing delayed bleeding, perforation, and the long-term prognosis should be solved and clarified in further investigations.

Appropriate duration of endoscopic dilation for postoperative benign esophageal strictures.

BACKGROUND: Benign esophageal strictures are a frequent complication after esophageal surgery or extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopic dilation is the preferred treatment in clinical practice. However, the allocation of time for each dilation is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriate duration of endoscopic dilation for benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection. METHODS: Patients with benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection between July 2010 and July 2018 were retrospectively included in this study. According to the dilation time (1, 3, 5 min), patients were divided into three groups. The clinical effects and adverse events were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: Altogether, 57 patients, including 21 in the 1-min group, 18 in the 3-min group and 18 in the 5-min group, were included. All patients underwent endoscopic treatment successfully. The stricture recurrence rate was 76.19% in the 1-min group, 55.56% in the 3-min group and 61.11% in the 5-min group. The median overall dysphagia-free period was 2.60 (range, 0.80-12.00) months in the 1-min group, 6.60 (range, 1.80-12.00) months in the 3-min group and 6.25 (range, 2.40-12.00) months in the 5-min group (P < 0.05). For patients who developed stricture recurrence, the mean dysphagia-free periods were 2.26  ±  1.27 months, 4.00  ±  1.76 months and 4.23  ±  1.63 months, respectively (P < 0.05). The dysphagia-free periods were comparable between the 3- and 5-min groups and were longer than those in the 1-min group. Muscle layer damage occurred in two patients (11.11%) in the 5-min group and in no patients in the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Three minutes was considered a safe and effective dilation duration for benign esophageal strictures after esophageal surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Complications following laser wedge excision for idiopathic subglottic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic laser wedge excision (LWE) is an effective treatment option for idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS); however, data regarding complications following LWE are limited. The aim of the following analysis was to provide a review of frequency and type of complications that occur with LWE in patients with iSGS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Patients with iSGS undergoing LWE between January 2002 and September 2021 were performed. Demographic data were recorded. Complications were stratified into major and minor categories. The frequency of these complications and the respective treatment for them was analyzed. RESULTS: 212 patients within the study period underwent a total of 573 LWE procedures. All but two patients were female, with a median age of 54 years at time of LWE. Of these patients, 43 (20 %) patients experienced a complication. Of these, only 7 (15 %) of the reported complications were considered major while the rest were minor in nature. Major complications included 3 cases of post-operative hemoptysis, 1 case of tracheitis, and 3 cases of reduced vocal fold hypomobility with concurrent glottic stenosis. Minor complications consisted of 2 cases of tooth fracture and 34 cases of tongue paresthesia post-operatively that was self-limited. There were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Major complications occur in <5 % of LWE procedures based off the analysis. All major complications were managed without significant long-term morbidity. Minor complications with the LWE are self-limited in nature. Our data supports the LWE as a safe treatment option for iSGS.

Initial management of esophageal anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with dilations up to 18-20 mm.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), but there is limited data regarding the initial management and subsequent outcomes after stricture dilation. There is concern that dilating to larger diameters upon the initial encounter, specifically with high-grade strictures, will lead to increased risk for complications. We therefore reviewed one surgeon's experience with esophageal dilations after THE and provided data and treatment recommendations based upon these findings. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent esophageal dilations ≥ 18 mm up to 20 mm after THE between 2006 and 2019 at our institution was performed. Patient demographics were n = 97, age = 70, 81 males. RESULTS: For all cases, the mean location, length, diameter of the stricture, and number of days from surgery and initial dilation were 20 cm, 1.9 cm, 6.7 mm, and 106 days, respectively. Most dilations (79%) occurred within 2 weeks to 3 months from surgery. 29.9% were dilated up to 18 mm, 10.3% were dilated up to 19 mm, and 59.8% were dilated up to 20 mm upon initial dilation. Even 1-mm-diameter lesions could be safely dilated upon 18-20 mm. In this study group there were no complications after endoscopic dilation that required hospitalization or further surgical or endoscopic interventions. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that early aggressive endoscopic management of esophageal anastomotic strictures after THE can be safely performed.

Endoscopic Management of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures.

Benign esophageal strictures are commonly encountered in clinical practice. The principal etiologies of benign esophageal strictures include long term acid reflux, caustic injuries, eosinophilic esophagitis, anastomotic strictures or endoscopic therapy. Dysphagia is most prominently present in esophageal strictures along with a variety of other symptoms which depend on the stricture etiology. Benign esophageal strictures can be categorized into two groups: simple or complex depending on their structure. Most strictures can be treated successfully with endoscopic dilation by bougies or balloons dilators. In some cases, treatment is more challenging, involving a higher risk of the patient developing recurrent or refractory strictures. To improve symptoms in these patients, other endoscopic treatments such as steroid injection, incisional therapy and stent placement should be considered. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review of the main treatment options currently available to manage recurrent benign esophageal strictures.

[Endoscopic Dilation to Treat One Case of Severe Intestinal Stenosis Caused by Endometriosis].

A 46-year-old woman was admitted for repeated abdominal distention and constipation for more than 10 years and further deterioration for 5 years. Colonoscopy showed, in the sigmoid colon, nodular neoplasm protruding into the cavity, resulting in local intestinal stenosis, through which the endoscopy could not pass. Pathological findings of the biopsy sample revealed changes caused by intestinal endometriosis. The patient underwent multiple endoscopic dilatation treatments in our hospital and the interval between recurrences of intestinal stenosis was extended from 6 months to 4 years. Intestinal endometriosis can cause repeated intractable stenosis caused by the infiltration of ectopic glands in the intestinal wall, which usually requires surgical intervention. Herein, we report a case of severe intestinal stenosis caused by endometriosis in the sigmoid colon. Good results have been achieved through endoscopic dilatation treatment. This case suggests that endoscopic dilation has good application value in the treatment of this kind of disease, which needs further exploration and promotion.

An endoscopic dilation method using the rendezvous approach for the treatment of severe anastomotic stenosis after rectal cancer surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative anastomotic stenosis is a common complication in colorectal cancer patients (3-30%). Complete anastomotic stenosis is rare; however, when it occurs, almost all cases require surgical treatment. We herein report a case in which endoscopic dilation was effective for treating complete anastomotic stenosis after high anterior resection in a rectal cancer patient. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 67-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic high anterior resection for rectal cancer (RS, T4a, N0, M0, Stage IIB (TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors)) in May 2018. The postoperative course was good and the patient was discharged on the 12th postoperative day. Subsequently adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated with oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV); however, he complained of frequent defecation and melena after completion of the first course of chemotherapy. Thus, colonoscopy was performed, which revealed anastomotic stenosis. Endoscopic dilation was initially attempted, but failed. Thus, low anterior resection was performed with diverting colostomy. Four additional courses of chemotherapy were administered for 1 month after surgery. At 6 months after the second surgery, colonoscopy was performed, and complete anastomotic stenosis was pointed out again. The patient was successfully treated by endoscopic dilation using the rendezvous method. After this treatment, the lumen of the anastomotic site was observed to have narrowed again and endoscopic dilatation to treat anastomotic stenosis was repeated. In addition, he received local injection of steroids in anastomotic stenosis site. The lumen of anastomotic stenosis remained after the local injection of steroids and closure of colostomy was performed 9 months after the second operation. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic dilation using the rendezvous method was effective for treating anastomotic stenosis after colorectal surgery.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Dilation in Patients with Esophageal Anastomotic Strictures: Comparison Between Different Etiologies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective study was aimed at assessing the efficacy of endoscopic dilation for esophageal anastomotic strictures, and to compare response between caustic anastomotic strictures (CAS) and non-caustic anastomotic strictures (NCAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with anastomotic strictures (enrolled during January 1996-December 2015) were analyzed. Short- and long-term outcomes of dilation, in terms of clinical success, refractory, and recurrent strictures were compared between NCAS and CAS. Patients with refractory and recurrent strictures were managed with adjunctive therapy including intralesional steroids. Factors predicting refractoriness at start of dilation and reasons for more than ten lifetime dilations were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients, 124 (mean age-44.02; males-74) underwent dilation. Clinical success was achieved in 113 (91.3%) patients requiring a median [Interquartile range (IQR)] of 4 (2-10) sessions. The number of dilations to achieve clinical success, refractory strictures, and recurrent strictures, and the use of adjunctive therapy were significantly higher for CAS than for NCAS. Intralesional steroid use decreased periodic dilation index (PDI) significantly in CAS. Caustic etiology and starting dilation diameter of < 10 mm were found to be predictors of refractoriness, with the former alone being an independent predictor of more than ten lifetime dilations. No patient had free perforation; however, five required revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with CAS fared worse than those with NCAS in terms of number of dilations, refractoriness, recurrence of strictures, and need of adjunctive therapy. Endoscopic dilation can successfully ameliorate dysphagia due to anastomotic strictures in a majority of patients.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Postfundoplication Dysphagia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dysphagia is a consequence of antireflux surgery (ARS) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We studied patient management and symptomatic outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 157 consecutive adult patients with GERD (mean age, 65.1 ± 1.0 y; 72% female) who underwent ARS at a tertiary care center from 2003 through 2014. We characterized postfundoplication dysphagia using a self-reported Likert scale, which ranged from a low score of 0 (no dysphagia) to a high score of 4 (severe daily dysphagia); scores of 2 or more indicated clinically significant dysphagia. Postfundoplication dysphagia was categorized as early (≤6 wk after ARS) or late (>6 wk after ARS), and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the time to development of clinically significant dysphagia. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to assess management response and identify factors associated with dysphagia. The primary aim was to determine the prevalence and clinical course of postfundoplication dysphagia in patients with GERD treated with ARS. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients, 54.8% had early postfundoplication dysphagia (clinically significant in 20.4%); only 3.5% required endoscopic intervention. Over 2.1 ± 0.2 years of follow-up evaluation, 29 patients (18.5%) developed late postfundoplication dysphagia. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median time to clinically significant late postfundoplication dysphagia was 0.75 years (95% CI, 0.26-1.22). Of 13 patients (44.8%) who underwent endoscopic dilation, improvement was reported by 92.3%, with a mean decrease in dysphagia severity of 1.55 ± 0.3, based on the Likert scale. Prefundoplication dysphagia, early postfundoplication dysphagia, recurrent hiatal hernia, and lack of contraction reserve following multiple rapid swallows were univariate predictors of late postfundoplication dysphagia (P ≤ .04); lack of contraction reserve was associated independently with late postfundoplication dysphagia, based on multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.11-12.56). CONCLUSIONS: Early and late postfundoplication dysphagia can be successfully managed conservatively or with endoscopic dilation, respectively. Lack of contraction reserve on multiple rapid swallows is associated independently with late postfundoplication dysphagia.

Self-dilation for therapy-resistant benign esophageal strictures: towards a systematic approach.

BACKGROUND: Patients with therapy-resistant benign esophageal strictures (TRBES) suffer from chronic dysphagia and generally require repeated endoscopic dilations. For selected patients, esophageal self-dilation may improve patient's autonomy and reduce the number of endoscopic dilations. We evaluated the clinical course and outcomes of patients who started esophageal self-dilation at our institution. METHODS: This study was a retrospective case series of patients with TRBES who started esophageal self-dilation between 2012 and 2016 at the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam. To learn self-dilation using Savary-Gilliard bougie dilators, patients visited the outpatient clinic on a weekly basis where they were trained by a dedicated nurse. Endoscopic dilation was continued until patients were able to perform self-bougienage adequately. The primary outcome was the number of endoscopic dilation procedures before and after initiation of self-dilation. Secondary outcomes were technical success, final bougie size, dysphagia scores, and adverse events. RESULTS: Seventeen patients started with esophageal self-dilation mainly because of therapy-resistant post-surgical (41%) and caustic (35%) strictures. The technical success rate of learning self-bougienage was 94% (16/17). The median number of endoscopic dilation procedures dropped from 17 [interquartile range (IQR) 11-27] procedures during a median period of 9 (IQR 6-36) months to 1.5 (IQR 0-3) procedures after the start of self-dilation (p < 0.001). The median follow-up after initiation of self-dilation was 17.6 (IQR 11.5-33.3) months. The final bougie size achieved with self-bougienage had a median diameter of 14 (IQR 13-15) mm. All patients could tolerate solid foods (Ogilvie dysphagia score ≤ 1), making the clinical success rate 94% (16/17). One patient (6%) developed a single episode of hematemesis related to self-bougienage. CONCLUSIONS: In this small case series, esophageal self-dilation was found to be successful 94% of patients when conducted under strict guidance. All patients performing self-bougienage achieved a stable situation where they could tolerate solid foods without the need for endoscopic dilation.

Outcomes after endoscopic dilation of laryngotracheal stenosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP.

IMPORTANCE: Endoscopic management of pediatric subglottic stenosis (SGS) is common, however no multi-institutional studies have assessed its perioperative outcomes. The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - Pediatric (ACS-NSQIP-P) represents a source of such data. DESIGN: Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were queried for endoscopic or open airway reconstruction in the ACS-NSQIP-P Public Use File (PUF). Demographics and 30-day events were abstracted to compare open to endoscopic techniques and to assess for risk factors for varied outcomes after endoscopic dilation. SETTING: National database. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with data reported in the 2015 ACS-NSQIP-P PUF. MEASUREMENTS: Length of stay (LOS), 30-day rates of reintubation, readmission and reoperation. RESULTS: 171 endoscopic and 116 open procedures were identified. Mean age at endoscopic and open procedures was 4.1 (SEM = 0.37) and 5.4 years (SEM = 0.40) respectively. Mean LOS was shorter after endoscopic procedures (5.5 days, SEM = 1.13 vs. 11.3 days SEM = 1.01, p = 0.0003). Open procedures had higher rates of reintubation (OR = 7.41, p = .026) and reoperation (OR = 3.09, p = .009). In patients undergoing endoscopic dilation, children <1 year were more likely to require readmission (OR=4.21, p=0.03) and reoperation (OR=4.39, p=0.03) when compared to older children. CONCLUSION: Open airway reconstruction is associated with longer LOS and increased reintubations and reoperations, suggesting a possible opportunity to improve value in healthcare in the appropriately selected patient. Reoperations and readmissions following endoscopic dilation are more prevalent in children less than one year.

Endoscopic dilation of benign esophageal anastomotic strictures over 16 mm has a longer lasting effect.

BACKGROUND: The optimal target of endoscopic dilation of postsurgical esophageal strictures is unknown. Our aim was to compare the dilation-free period of patients who underwent dilation up to 16 mm with patients who were dilated up to 17 or 18 mm. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients who received bougie/balloon dilation for a benign anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. An anastomotic stricture was defined as dysphagia in combination with a luminal diameter of ≤13 mm at endoscopy. We analyzed the dilation-free period using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were dilated up to a maximum diameter of 16 mm and 91 patients to a diameter >16 mm. The stricture recurrence rate was 79.5 % in the 16 mm group and 68.1 % in the >16 mm group (p = 0.083). The overall dilation-free period had a median of 41.5 (range 8-3233) days and 92 (range 17-1745) days, respectively (p < 0.001). For patients who developed a stricture recurrence, the median dilation-free period was 28 (range 8-487) days and 63 (range 17-1013) days, respectively (p = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed a reduced risk of stricture recurrence for patients who were dilated up to >16 mm: crude hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.81) and adjusted HR 0.48 (95 % CI 0.33-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic dilation over 16 mm resulted in a significant prolongation of the dilation-free period in comparison with dilation up to 16 mm in patients with benign anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy.

Complications of endoscopic dilation for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic dilation (ED) is used for the treatment of benign strictures caused by reflux esophagitis or anastomotic stenosis after esophagectomy. Esophageal stenosis is a major complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of large superficial esophageal cancer, but little is known regarding the incidence of complications of ED for stenosis caused by esophageal ESD. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single institution. From September 2002 to December 2012, a total of 1,337 ED procedures were performed for stenosis after esophageal ESD in 121 patients. The incidence of complications of ED and related clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of bleeding was 0.8 % (1/121) per patient and 0.07 % (1/1,337) per procedure. The incidence of perforation was 4.1 % (5/121) per patient and 0.37 % (5/1,337) per procedure. Perforation occurred at a median of third time of ED procedures (range 2-9 procedures) and at a median of 18 days (range 8-29 days) after ESD. There were no significant characteristics correlated to perforation, such as location, circumferential extent, or diameter of mucosal defect after ESD. The total number of ED procedures was significantly larger among perforation cases (37, range 6-57) compared with those without perforation (7, range 1-70) (p = 0.01), and the treatment duration tended to be longer (190 vs. 69 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bleeding caused by ED for esophageal stenosis after ESD was very low. Relevant risk of perforation should be considered for patients requiring multiple ED procedures.

Adverse events associated with endoscopic dilation for gastric stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric stenosis is a major problem after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large early gastric cancer, but little is known about the incidence of adverse events associated with endoscopic dilation (ED) for stenosis caused by gastric ESD. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and risk of bleeding and perforation associated with ED for gastric stenosis after ESD. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted at a specialized center for treating cancer. A total of 342 procedures of wire-guided balloon ED were performed for stenosis after gastric ESD in 64 patients. The incidence of adverse events and related clinical characteristics was analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of bleeding was 3.1% (2/64) per patient and 0.6% (2/342) per procedure. One bleeding case with incomplete cessation of antithrombotics before ED required blood transfusion. The incidence of perforation was 7.8% (5/64) per patient and 1.5% (5/342) per procedure. All perforations occurred in the lower part of the stomach. Two of the five perforation cases were inappropriate for nonoperative therapy, and thus, emergency surgery was performed. Among the other three perforation cases, one case required surgery for refractory stenosis and ED was continued in one case after nonoperative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bleeding caused by ED for gastric stenosis after ESD was small. Although not significant, ED in the lower stomach presents a substantial risk of perforation.