Fecal Lactoferrin Predicts Primary Nonresponse to Biologic Agents in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Fecal lactoferrin (FL) is a timely and accurate marker of inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to verify whether FL can predict primary nonresponse (PNR) to biologic agents during induction. METHODS: Retrospective outcome review in 27 patients (13 with CD and 14 with UC) tested for baseline FL and retested within a week after the first and second induction doses. Clinical/biochemical outcomes were evaluated at end of induction and at follow-up (3-24 months). RESULTS: Compared to baseline, changes of the Harvey-Bradshaw (CD) and Partial Mayo Scoring (UC) indices at end of induction separated responders (18/27 or 67%) from nonresponders (9/17 or 33%). In all patients, the initial FL value at induction decreased compared to baseline, continuing to decrease after the following dose in clinical responders while bouncing back in the others. Models targeting the 2 consecutively decreased FL values or the second FL value compared to baseline or the second FL value compared to the first were able to accurately predict response at end of induction. Follow-up assessment confirmed clinical remission in initial responders (with FL values reduced on the average by 94 ± 10% compared to baseline). CONCLUSIONS: In CD and UC patients during induction with biologic agents, early FL measurements accurately separate clinical responders from those experiencing PNR. The method described here offers several potential advantages over other strategies to assess and manage these patients.

Fecal Lactoferrin and Other Putative Fecal Biomarkers in Crohn's Disease: Do They Still Have a Potential Clinical Role?

INTRODUCTION: The need for noninvasive markers of disease activity is mandatory in the assessment of Crohn's disease (CD). The most widely fecal biomarker in CD, despite several limits, is fecal calprotectin. This review aims to elucidate the role, if any, of all other fecal biomarkers, as alternative tools for assessing clinical and endoscopic disease activity, and predict capsule endoscopy findings, response to therapy, disease relapse, and postoperative recurrence. These fecal biomarkers included lactoferrin, S100A12, high mobility group box 1, neopterin, polymorphonuclear neutrophil elastase, fecal hemoglobin, alpha1-antitrypsin, lysozyme, human beta-defensin-2, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, matrix metalloproteinase-9, chitinase 3-like-1, M2-pyruvate kinase, myeloperoxidase, and eosinophil proteins. METHODS: A systematic electronic search in the medical literature was performed up to April 2020. Seventy eligible studies were identified out of 859 citations. Data were grouped according to the assessment of clinical and endoscopic disease activity, capsule endoscopy findings, response to therapy, prediction of relapse, and postoperative recurrence. RESULTS: The overall correlation between lactoferrin and clinical indexes is poor, while performance is good with endoscopic scores. Lactoferrin seems to represent a reasonably good surrogate marker of response to therapy and to be potentially useful in identifying patients at high risk for endoscopic relapse or postoperative recurrence. The evaluation of the performance of all other fecal markers is limited by the lack of adequate data. CONCLUSIONS: None of the fecal markers so far represents an acceptable alternative to calprotectin in clinical practice. Fecal lactoferrin is the only possible exception, but a more extensive investigation is still required.

Elevated fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin associated with small intestinal lesions in patients with Behçet disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small intestinal lesions in patients with Behçet disease (BD) have a risk of perforation and hemorrhage requiring surgery. However, no screening strategy for such lesions has been established. We investigated small intestinal lesions in BD patients with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and analyzed clinical characteristics to identify noninvasive biomarkers of such lesions. METHODS: This study included 33 BD patients who underwent VCE (PillCam® SB3) at our institution from June 2016 to January 2019. Clinical characteristics, including age, sex, disease duration, body mass index, gastrointestinal symptoms, eye involvement, and blood examinations, were obtained from the medical records of 27 of the 33 patients. Fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin, fecal calprotectin (FC), and fecal lactoferrin (FL) were measured. VCE findings of 145 healthy Japanese individuals from a previous report were used as controls. RESULTS: Two intestinal BD patients were included in the 27 patients. We observed that BD patients exhibit more small intestinal lesions compared with healthy individuals, including erosions, ulcers, and total lesions (erosions or ulcers). FC and FL levels were significantly higher in patients with versus without small intestinal lesions (P = 0.034 and P = 0.046, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated that FC (cutoff value = 119 µg/g) and FL (cutoff value = 17 µg/g) were biomarkers for small intestinal lesions in patients with BD. CONCLUSION: The present study using VCE showed that patients with BD had more small intestinal lesions than healthy individuals. FC and FL could be useful for screening BD patients who may have small intestinal lesions.

Occurrence of Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 in hospitals of Silesia, Poland.

Clostridium difficile is an important healthcare-associated pathogen, responsible for a broad spectrum of diarrheal diseases. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI), to characterize cultured C. difficile strains and to investigate the association of fecal lactoferrin with CDI. Between January 2013 and June 2014, 148 stool samples were obtained from adult diarrheal patients (C. difficile as a suspected pathogen) hospitalized in different healthcare facilities of 15 Silesian hospitals. Out of 134 isolated C. difficile strains, 108 were ribotyped: 82.4% belonged to Type 027, 2.8% to Type 176, 2.8% to Type 014, 1.9% to Type 010 and 0.9% to Types 001, 018, 020 and 046 each. In total, 6.5% non-typable strains were identified. All Type 027 isolates contained both toxin genes tcdA & tcdB, and binary toxin genes (cdtA &cdtB). Susceptibility testing revealed that all Type 027 isolates were sensitive to metronidazole and vancomycin and resistant to moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem and erythromycin. Of 89 Type 027 strains, 16 had a ermB (688 bp) gene coinciding with high levels of erythromycin resistance (MIC >256 µg/mL). Of 16 ermB positive strains, 14 demonstrated also high level of resistance to clindamycin (>256 µg/mL). A significant difference (p = 0.004) in lactoferrin level was found between C. difficile toxin-positive (n = 123; median 185.9 µg/mL; IQR 238.8) and toxin-negative (n = 25; median 22.4 µg/mL; IQR 141.7) fecal samples. Stool samples from n = 89 patients with CDI caused by Type 027 demonstrated significantly higher (p = 0.03) lactoferrin level (median 173.0 µg/mL; IQR 237.3) than from patients with CDI caused by other ribotypes and non-typable C. difficile strains (median 189.4 µg/mL; IQR 190.8).

Trajectory of fecal lactoferrin for predicting prognosis in ulcerative colitis.

Objectives: To investigate the characteristics and prognostic value of fecal lactoferrin trajectories in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: This study used data from the UNIFI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02407236) and included patients who received ustekinumab during induction for trajectory modeling (n = 637). Patients who received ustekinumab during maintenance therapy were used for 1-year outcome analyses (n = 403). The levels of fecal lactoferrin, fecal calprotectin, and serum C-reactive protein were measured at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. The trajectories of these biomarkers were developed using a latent class growth mixed model. Results: The trajectories of fecal lactoferrin, fecal calprotectin, and serum C-reactive protein were distinct, but all were associated with prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and vedolizumab. Furthermore, the fecal lactoferrin trajectory was the most valuable predictor of endoscopic, clinical, and histological remission. Compared to the high/moderate-rapid decrease trajectory group, the moderate-slow decrease, high-slow decrease, and high-stable groups had adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 0.38 (0.18, 0.78; P = 0.010), 0.47 (0.23, 0.93; P = 0.032), and 0.33 (0.17, 0.63; P = 0.001), respectively, of 1-year endoscopic remission. Patients with high/moderate-rapid decrease trajectories also had the highest likelihood of achieving clinical and histological remission. Finally, we developed a patient-stratification scheme based on fecal lactoferrin trajectories and concentrations. Patients with good, moderate, and poor prognoses in the scheme had a distinct probability of achieving 1-year endoscopic remission (52.7%, 30.9%, and 12.8%, respectively). Conclusions: The trajectory of fecal lactoferrin is a valuable prognostic factor for 1-year remission in UC.

Fecal lactoferrin early predicts long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis: A post-hoc analysis of the UNIFI and PURSUIT trials.

BACKGROUND: Fecal lactoferrin (FL) is associated with disease activity and relapse in ulcerative colitis. However, whether FL could early predict long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis is poorly understood. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included participants who received biologics and had available data of FL concentration at week 4 from the UNIFI and PURSUIT trials (n = 1063). Therapeutic outcomes, including clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and remission, and histological improvement and remission, were evaluated at the end of maintenance therapy. The incidence of colectomy was observed from week 0 to maximum week 228 in the PURSUIT trial (n = 667). Multivariate logistic and Cox proportional-hazard regression were conducted to evaluate the associations between FL and therapeutic outcomes and colectomy, respectively. RESULTS: A high FL level at week 4 was associated with poor long-term clinical, endoscopic and histologic outcomes. FL >84.5 µg/mL predicted a low likelihood of clinical (OR [95% CI]: 0.43 [0.32, 0.57]; p < 0.001), endoscopic (OR [95% CI]: 0.40 [0.29, 0.56]; p < 0.001), and histological (OR [95% CI]: 0.27 [0.14, 0.53]; p < 0.001) remission. Moreover, week-4 FL could add prognostic value to fecal calprotectin and clinical and endoscopic scores for informing long-term therapeutic outcomes. For the risk of colectomy, patients with week-4 FL <20.1 and ≥20.1 µg/mL had an incidence rate of 1.10% and 6.39%, respectively. Patients with FL ≥20.1 µg/mL had a 995% higher risk of colectomy (HR [95% CI], 10.95 [1.45, 82.74]). CONCLUSION: FL could be a promising prognostic biomarker for long-term therapeutic outcomes and risk of colectomy in patient of ulcerative colitis.

Timely Monitoring of Inflammation by Fecal Lactoferrin Rapidly Predicts Therapeutic Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Fecal lactoferrin (FL) levels may mirror drug-induced changes in inflammation in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease in a timely way and could be used to assess loss of response (LOR) to biologics. METHODS: This study is a retrospective outcome review in 61 patients on adalimumab, infliximab, or vedolizumab managed in our center and followed for 6 to 24 months. Patients were 1) in clinical remission or 2) were experiencing possible LOR. RESULTS: For group 1, in 71% of 31 patients, FL slowly increased during the therapeutic interval (R2 = 0.769; P < 0.001), thus reflecting increasing inflammation as drug concentrations decreased. In the remaining patients, FL was undetectable throughout the therapeutic interval because of a stronger suppression of inflammation. For group 2, in 30 patients negative for infections, FL levels measured 1 to 3 days after infusion/injection compared to preadministration values either increased (nonresponders)-in these patients the medication was switched to another class; partially decreased (partial responders)-the therapeutic interval was shortened; or were normal throughout (responders)-causes for symptoms unrelated to disease activity were found for all. After FL-based management, 3-month standardized clinical scores were normalized in both partial responders (0.58 ±â€…0.21 vs 0.13 ±â€…0.09; P < 0.001) and nonresponders (0.81 ±â€…0.17 vs 0.12 ±â€…0.08; P < 0.001), and FL levels dropped by up to 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of FL reflect drug-induced changes in mucosal inflammation in a timely way, thus enabling rapid assessment of therapeutic response in patients with ulcerative colitis and with Crohn disease. In patients with suspected LOR, FL levels before and after infusion/injection accurately separated responders, partial responders, and nonresponders. The strategy proposed here is simple, accurate, and easily applicable to clinical practice.

Achieving Target Infliximab Drug Concentrations Improves Blood and Fecal Neutrophil Biomarkers in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil fecal biomarkers, calprotectin (FCP) and lactoferrin (LCT), and peripheral blood neutrophil CD64 surface receptor (nCD64) are biomarkers for mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although FCP has been evaluated as a biomarker for mucosal healing, cut points for LCT and nCD64 are less known. We aimed to identify the cut points for LCT and nCD64 that were associated with FCP remission, with a secondary aim to evaluate the relationship between biochemical outcomes and infliximab (IFX) trough concentrations. METHODS: We analyzed FCP, LCT, and nCD64 before and after IFX induction in a pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) cohort study. Week-14 FCP biomarker remission was defined as FCP <250 µg/g, with clinical response defined as a weighted Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index <12.5 or Δ>17.5 improvement. Predictive outcomes were calculated by receiver operating characteristics (ROCs). RESULTS: Among 56 CD patients, ROC analysis identified an infusion 4 LCT <8.06 (area under the receiver operator characteristics [AUROC], 0.934, P < 0.001) and nCD64 <6.12 (AUROC, 0.76, P = 0.02) as the ideal cut points for week-14 FCP biomarker remission. End of induction IFX-trough of >9.4 µg/mL (AUROC, 0.799, P = 0.002) and >11.5 µg/mL (AUROC, 0.835, P = 0.003) were associated with a FCP <250 and FCP <100, respectively. We found patients achieving end of induction trough >5 µg/mL had a median FCP improvement (dose 1 to dose 4) of 90% compared with a median of 35% with levels <5 µg/mL (P = 0.024) with a similar median reduction in nCD64 (48% vs 20%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes cut points in neutrophil stool and blood biomarkers for both biochemical remission and therapeutic trough levels following induction therapy. Further studies that evaluate pharmacodynamic biomarker targets for endoscopic and histologic healing are warranted.

The Addition of Other Fecal Biomarkers Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test Alone in a Colorrectal Cancer Screening Cohort.

Background: Screening with fecal occult blood test reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality, and is currently implemented in most countries. However, around 40% of screening colonoscopies are normal. Thus, strategies to avoid these colonoscopies are highly necessary. Adding other fecal biomarkers, such as fecal calprotectin (FC), lactoferrin, and transferrin may be useful, but evidence is scarce. Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fecal occult blood immunochemical test (FIT), FC, and a one-step combo card test for the simultaneous semi-qualitative detection of human hemoglobin (hHb), transferrin (hTf), calprotectin (hCp) and lactoferrin (hLf) in a CRC screening program population. Methods: Single-center, prospective observational study, enrolling patients included in a CRC screening program, referred for a colonoscopy due to a positive FIT test. Participants collected a stool sample prior to bowel preparation, and FIT, FC and the combo semi-qualitative tests were performed on the sample. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under receiver operator curve (AUC) for diagnosis of advanced neoplasia, advanced adenoma and CRC were estimated for each biomarker and their combinations. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess whether these biomarkers could improve the diagnostic accuracy of FIT alone. Results: 336 consecutive patients (64% males) were recruited. Advanced neoplasia was found in 129/336 (38.4%) patients, and of these, 22/336 (6.5%) were diagnosed of CRC. 153/336 (45.5%) colonoscopies were completely normal. The AUC for the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia were 0.725 (95%CI 0.665-0.784) for FIT, 0.477 (95%CI 0.413-0.541) for FC and 0.732 (95%CI 0.674-0.791) for the combination of both (FIT + FC) quantitative tests. The AUCs for the combo test were 0.70 (95%CI 0.641-0.760) for hHb, 0.625 (95%CI 0.562-0.698) for hTf, 0.532 (95%CI 0.469-0.595) for hCp, 0.531 (95%CI 0.466-0.595 ) for hLf and 0.681 (95%CI 0.620-0.741) for the combination of the four biomarkers. Conclusion: In average-risk population, FIT appears to be the best fecal marker for the diagnosis of CRC and advanced adenoma. None of the other biomarkers explored or their combinations provided a better diagnostic accuracy. Only hTF showed an acceptable diagnostic accuracy. FC and hLF were not useful in this setting.

A Patient Self-Made Point-of-Care Fecal Test Improves Diagnostic Accuracy Compared with Fecal Calprotectin Alone in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring inflammatory bowel disease patients may be challenging. Fecal calprotectin is one of the most performed tests. Other fecal biomarkers are less used in clinical practice. Rapid fecal tests that could be performed by patients may be a useful strategy to closely monitor disease activity. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study including consecutive inflammatory bowel disease patients referred for colonoscopy in a single center. Certest FOB + Transferrin + Calprotectin + Lactoferrin® (Certest Biotec S.L, Zaragoza, Spain), a one-step point-of-care test which simultaneously detects these four biomarkers was performed. Endoscopic inflammatory activity was defined using the Mayo score (≥1) in ulcerative colitis, SES-CD (>3) and Rutgeerts scores (≥1) for Crohn's disease. RESULTS: Out of a total of 106 patients (56.5% female, mean age 51 years), 54 (50.9%) were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and 52 (49.1%) with Crohn's disease. Endoscopic activity was detected in 42 patients (39.0%). Fecal calprotectin provided the best sensitivity (97.6%), with limited specificity (34.4%). Compared to calprotectin, the other 3 fecal biomarkers showed better specificity (87.5-92.1%) and lower sensitivity (45.2-59.5%). Patients with a negative result in all biomarkers (19/106-17.9%) had 100% (CI 95% 97.4-100) negative predictive value, while patients with the 4 biomarkers positive (13/106-12.3%) had 100% (CI 95% 96.1-100) positive predictive value of endoscopic inflammatory activity. AUROC of this 4 biomarker point-of-care test was 0.845 (95% CI 0.771-0.920), significantly higher than the AUROCs of any of the 4 biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: This test may be a useful strategy to monitor inflammatory activity in clinical practice by excluding or prioritizing patients in need of a colonoscopy.

Fecal Lactoferrin and Other Stool Markers during Normal Pregnancy and in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Prospective Study and Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) - both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) - during pregnancy can be challenging since most monitoring tools available in nonpregnant patients are contraindicated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to test whether fecal inflammatory markers - specifically fecal lactoferrin - physiologically change during normal pregnancy as a prerequisite to use them to monitor IBD activity during pregnancy. METHODS: Fecal lactoferrin was tested in healthy pregnant and nonpregnant women from the same geographic area and age range (18-40 years) - all negative for clinical gastrointestinal tract inflammation. A retrospective review of fecal lactoferrin levels contrasted with the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD, and the Disease Activity Index for UC was also performed in women with active IBDs within the same age range and geographical area. RESULTS: In 30 nonpregnant subjects, fecal lactoferrin levels were 0.87 ± 1.08 µg/g. In 49 pregnant subjects, levels were 0.59 ± 0.83, 0.87 ± 1.13, and 0.85 ± 1.06 µg/g during the first, second, and third trimester, respectively (p = 0.64), with average levels for the 3 trimesters of 0.81 ± 1.04 µg/g (p = 0.61 compared to nonpregnant subjects). Sequential fecal lactoferrin levels (n = 26) did not differ from one trimester to the other in the individual subjects (p = 0.80). In 45 female IBD patients (27 with CD and 18 with UC), fecal lactoferrin levels were correlated with disease activity as defined by the endoscopic scores: 218, 688, and 1,175 µg/g for CD and 931, 2,088, and 2,509 µg/g for UC, respectively, for mild, moderate, and severe activity. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal lactoferrin levels during normal pregnancy are superimposable to those of nonpregnant women and significantly below levels in women of the same childbearing age with active IBDs. Additional published data - reviewed in this atricle - and our own indicate that fecal lactoferrin and other markers can be potentially used to monitor disease activity in pregnant IBD patients.

Fecal lactoferrin accurately reflects mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated a potential role for fecal biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal lactoferrin (FL) in monitoring inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) - Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, their correlation to endoscopic scores, disease severity and affected intestinal surface has not been extensively investigated. AIM: To correlate FL, and for comparison white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP), with endoscopic scores, disease extent and location in CD and UC. METHODS: Retrospective analysis in 188 patients who had FL, CRP and WBC determined within 30 d of endoscopy. Disease location, disease extent (number of intestinal segments involved), disease severity (determined by endoscopic scores), timing of FL testing in relation to colonoscopy, as well as the use of effective fast acting medications (steroids and biologics) between colonoscopy and FL measurement, were recorded. RESULTS: In 131 CD and 57 UC patients, both CRP and FL - but not WBC - distinguished disease severity (inactive, mild, moderate, severe). In patients receiving fast-acting (steroids or biologics) treatment in between FL and colonoscopy, FL showed a higher correlation to endoscopic scores when tested before vs after the procedure (r = 0.596, P < 0.001, vs r = 0.285, P = 0.15 for the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD; and r = 0.402, P = 0.01 vs r = 0.054 P = 0.84 for Disease Activity Index). Finally, FL was significantly correlated with the diseased mucosal surface (colon-ileocolon > small bowel) and the number of inflamed colon segments. CONCLUSION: FL and CRP separated disease severity categories with FL showing lower discriminating P-values. FL showed a close correlation with the involved mucosal surface and with disease extent and was more closely correlated to endoscopy when determined before the procedure - this indicating that inflammatory activity changes associated with therapy might be rapidly reflected by FL levels. FL can accurately and timely characterize intestinal inflammation in IBD.

Fecal biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: how, when and why?

INTRODUCTION: Over the last thirty years knowledge on fecal biomarkers (FM) has substantially increased. Nowadays these non-invasive inflammation markers are used in the daily management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The interest in investigating FM was motivated by the need of a simple, quick, disposable and less invasive marker of disease activity, which might remove the need for endoscopy when following up with patients. Areas covered: Current literature was reviewed for articles regarding the role of FM in IBD diagnosis, activity, flare prediction, medication and surgical treatment response as well as how FM may differ in adult and paediatric IBD patient populations. Expert commentary: Although FM is relevant in IBD patient follow-up, there isn't enough data regarding FM reference values for different ages, different disease subtypes, disease localization/extension or response to therapy. Serial measurements of FM for each patient may be useful in accessing relapse in most patients. FM presented more consistent results when used as a predictive tool of relapse after ileocecal surgery in Crohn's disease. Ongoing research will clarify FM role in decision-making IBD daily practice.

Clinical Significance of Fecal Lactoferrin and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients with Acute Diarrhea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnostic yield of fecal leukocyte and stool cultures is unsatisfactory in patients with acute diarrhea. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical significance of the fecal lactoferrin test and fecal multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients with acute diarrhea. METHODS: Clinical parameters and laboratory findings, including fecal leukocytes, fecal lactoferrin, stool cultures and stool multiplex PCR for bacteria and viruses, were evaluated prospectively for patients who were hospitalized due to acute diarrhea. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included (male, 23; median age, 42.5 years). Fecal leukocytes and fecal lactoferrin were positive in 33 (61.1%) and 14 (25.4%) patients, respectively. Among the 31 patients who were available for fecal pathogen evaluation, fecal multiplex PCR detected bacterial pathogens in 21 patients, whereas conventional stool cultures were positive in only one patient (67.7% vs 3.2%, p=0.000). Positive fecal lactoferrin was associated with presence of moderate to severe dehydration and detection of bacterial pathogens by multiplex PCR (21.4% vs 2.5%, p=0.049; 100% vs 56.5%, p=0.032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal lactoferrin is a useful marker for more severe dehydration and bacterial etiology in patients with acute diarrhea. Fecal multiplex PCR can detect more causative organisms than conventional stool cultures in patients with acute diarrhea.

Diagnostic accuracy of fecal lactoferrin for inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To do a systematic review using meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of fecal lactoferrin (FL) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed a literature review and systematically searched the Medline and EMBASE databases for eligible studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS tool. The sensitivity, specificity, and other diagnostic indexes of FL were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven studies, involving 1816 patients, met the inclusion criteria. In all studies, the pooled FL sensitivity and pooled specificity were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72, 0.89) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.98), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 16.63 and 0.18, respectively. The area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 90.04 (95% CI: 37.01, 219.02). The pooled FL sensitivity and specificity for Crohn's disease (CD) diagnosis (sensitivity =75%, specificity =100%) was not as good as it was for ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosis (sensitivity =82%, specificity =100%). CONCLUSION: FL, as a noninvasive and screening marker, has a high specificity and a modest specificity during the diagnosis of suspected IBD.

Diagnosis and monitoring of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

Despite advances in medical management, many patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require intestinal surgery throughout their lives. Surgery is not a cure, and postoperative recurrence is common in patients with CD. Ileocolonoscopy has been considered to be the gold standard in the diagnosis and monitoring of postoperative recurrence. However, the optimal monitoring strategy for postoperative recurrence has yet to be established. Capsule endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging techniques, including ultrasonography, computed tomography and MRI, have been used in the postoperative setting, and their usefulness in the monitoring of disease activity has been evaluated in recent clinical trials. The value of fecal markers, such as calprotectin and lactoferrin, has been also assessed in several studies. This review was to identify optimized methods for the diagnosis and monitoring of postoperative recurrence in CD.

Quantitative Fecal Lactoferrin as a Biomarker for Severe Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have increased over the past decade, especially among hospitalized patients. In this study, we determined the value of published criteria for severe CDI in predicting 3 month mortality, as well as the utility of fecal lactoferrin as a biomarker for severe CDI. METHODS: Pilot Year 1 of IRB approved (HSR-IRB# 13630) prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with CDI at US academic medical center (10/08-4/10). Medical records of hospitalized patients with clinically diagnosed CDI, via toxin assay, were evaluated to objectively define severe CDI based on current guidelines. A stool sample from CDI diagnosis was analyzed for amount of fecal lactoferrin (IBD-SCAN, TechLab, Inc.). Data was analyzed using SPSS for student's t-test and chi-squared, significance p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: 79 subjects consented and enrolled, mean age was 64 years (standard deviation, sd, 17.2), 48 (61%) female, and average Charlson co-morbidity score was 5.8 (sd 3.8). Subjects with severe CDI were 5 times more likely to die within 3 months of diagnosis (Odds Ratio 5.66 (95% Confidence Interval 2.03-15.79), p=0.001) and had significantly more fecal lactoferrin (580.0 (sd 989.0) vs. 181.7 (sd 244.2) µg/mL, p=0.018), compared to those that did not meet severe CDI criteria. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, subjects who meet defined criteria for severe CDI had higher mortality and more intestinal inflammation. These preliminary results were, however, underpowered to show a direct association of lactoferrin with mortality. Larger cohort studies are needed to optimize a criterion for severe CDI and evaluate a direct association of lactoferrin and mortality in hospitalized patients with CDI.