Digital home care interventions and quality of primary care for older adults: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Population aging is forcing the transformation of health care. Long-term care in the home is complex and involves complex communication with primary care services. In this scenario, the expansion of digital health has the potential to improve access to home-based primary care; however, the use of technologies can increase inequalities in access to health for an important part of the population. The aim of this study was to identify and map the uses and types of digital health interventions and their impacts on the quality of home-based primary care for older adults. METHODS: This is a broad and systematized scoping review with rigorous synthesis of knowledge directed by the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, and the qualitative data were analyzed through basic qualitative content analysis, considering the organizational, relational, interpersonal and technical dimensions of care. The preliminary results were subjected to consultation with stakeholders to identify strengths and limitations, as well as potential forms of socialization. RESULTS: The mapping showed the distribution of publications in 18 countries and in the Sub-Saharan Africa region. Older adults have benefited from the use of different digital health strategies; however, this review also addresses limitations and challenges, such as the need for digital literacy and technological infrastructure. In addition to the impacts of technologies on the quality of health care. CONCLUSIONS: The review gathered priority themes for the equitable implementation of digital health, such as access to home caregivers and digital tools, importance of digital literacy and involvement of patients and their caregivers in health decisions and design of technologies, which must be prioritized to overcome limitations and challenges, focusing on improving quality of life, shorter hospitalization time and autonomy of older adults.

Adapting Measurement-Based Care to VA Home-Based Primary Care Mental Health Treatment: A Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVES: This quality improvement project sought to develop guidance for Home-Based Primary Care (HPBC) Mental Health (MH) clinicians on integrating Measurement-Based Care (MBC) into their practice and gain participating psychologists' feedback on their experience using MBC for treating mental health concerns with HBPC Veterans. METHODS: Based on feedback from the HBPC MH community and in consultation with national leadership, a workgroup of HBPC psychologists developed a guide tailoring MBC to HBPC Veterans. Eight HBPC psychologists piloted the adapted MBC approach with 53 Veterans. Participating psychologists provided feedback on measure administration, Veterans' responses to MBC, and perceived benefits and challenges. RESULTS: Pilot participants' feedback suggested that MBC can be a highly useful tool for delivering mental health services in HBPC, although feedback varied about specific MBC measures. Qualitative feedback was primarily positive, but participants noted challenges based on the nature of the presenting problem and Veteran-specific characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that MBC can be utilized with appropriate HBPC Veterans and has the potential to benefit care. Further research is needed to clarify factors that enhance or reduce MBC's utility within HBPC. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: HBPC MH providers identified MBC as a useful tool particularly when adapted to meet the needs of HBPC Veterans.

Characteristics of Homebound and Patients with Disability Who Use Home-Based Primary Care in Korea: A Retrospective Study for 2018-2022.

(1) Background and Methods: This study evaluated characteristics of South Korean patients necessitating home-based primary care (HBPC) from 2018 to 2022, distinguishing between homebound individuals with chronic conditions and those with registered disabilities. (2) Result: Among 171 HBPC recipients, 56.1% were homebound, predominantly older with a median age of 81 years (interquartile range (IQR 68.5-86.0)), while 43.9% were disabled, generally younger with a median age of 39 years (IQR, 28-64). Activities of daily living were assessed, revealing a median score of 14 (IQR, 10-19), indicative of high care dependency. The most common conditions among homebound patients were dementia (27.1%) and physical mobility difficulties (21.9%), whereas mental disabilities (53.3%) and mobility issues (36.0%) prevailed in disabled patients. The primary HBPC needs for homebound patients included management of acute medical conditions (27.1%) and sores (17.7%). Conversely, regular health check-ups (46.7%) and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms (26.7%) were prevalent among the disabled group. (3) Conclusion: Notably, over 90% of HBPC patients required assistance with daily activities, highlighting significant differences in the needs and characteristics between older, homebound individuals with multiple comorbidities and younger, disabled patients receiving medical aid. These insights emphasize the necessity to develop customized HBPC programs to adequately cater to the diverse patient needs within South Korea.

A Scoping Review of Dementia Interventions in Home-Based Primary Care.

OBJECTIVES: Home-based primary care (HBPC) provides interdisciplinary, longitudinal, comprehensive care at home to homebound older adults. The prevalence of dementia among HBPC recipients is approximately 50%. To date, little research has been performed to determine whether dementia-specific interventions have been conducted in HBPC or their efficacy. We performed a scoping review to assess the landscape of dementia interventions in HBPC. DESIGN: Systematic scoping review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Care delivery programs for patients or caregivers of patients with dementia for the purpose of improving the management of dementia in the setting of HBPC. METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR protocol was followed. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for articles on dementia-focused interventions implemented in HBPC. Articles were excluded if they consisted of abstracts only, were not in English, or were not dementia interventions in HBPC. RESULTS: A total of 1657 unique titles and abstracts were screened. Overall, 1584 titles and abstracts were excluded, resulting in 73 full-text studies to assess for eligibility. Of these 73 full-text studies, 1 study met criteria for inclusion, an observational study assessing the implementation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) intervention in Veterans Affairs HBPC. That study found the intervention to be effective in reducing caregiver burden, with a decrease of 2 hours on duty per day, trending toward significance. Among the excluded 72 full-text studies, some studies included potentially relevant interventions that could be translated into HBPC care, including dementia interventions that targeted long-term services and supports, office-based primary care and other nonhome settings such as nursing homes, and home-based palliative care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite high prevalence of dementia among homebound older adults receiving HBPC, there are a dearth of studies on HBPC-specific dementia interventions. Future studies should consider adapting and testing interventions found to be effective in other settings to HBPC.

Caring for caregivers and persons living with dementia under home-based primary care: protocol for an interventional clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 7.5 million older adults are homebound, who have difficulty and/or need assistance to leave their homes. In this growing population, the prevalence of people living with dementia (PLWD) is approximately 50%. Current dementia care models in the USA were developed for traditional office-based primary care and have not been tailored to home-based primary care (HBPC) delivery models. Literature has shown that office-based collaborative interventions can improve caregiver outcomes including caregiver stress, well-being, and morbidity and patient outcomes including improved quality of life and reduced emergency department visits (Possin KL, Merrilees JJ, Dulaney S, Bonasera SJ, Chiong W, Lee K, JAMA Int Med 179:1658, 2019). To date, the evidence for HBPC dementia interventions is lacking. Though HBPC has demonstrated benefit in homebound older adults, there is limited literature on the effects of HBPC on persons living with dementia (Nguyen HQ, Vallejo JD, Macias M, Shiffman MG, Rosen R, Mowry V, J Am Geriatr Soc 70:1136-46, 2021). Our goal is to develop a HBPC-focused dementia care intervention that integrates the components of two previously developed dementia care models and test the feasibility of implementing it in HBPC practices to improve the quality of life and wellbeing of homebound PLWD and their caregivers. METHODS: We will first conduct qualitative focus groups at two HBPC practice sites, one in the Southeast and one in Hawaii in order to obtain preliminary feedback on the proposed intervention. At each site, there will be one focus group with caregivers of PLWD and another with HBPC clinicians and staff to help develop and refine our intervention. We will then conduct an open-pilot trial of the refined intervention at the two HBPC practices. A total of up to 25 patient/caregiver dyads will be recruited at each site (N = 50 total). Outcomes measured through pre-and-post assessments and exit interviews will include (a) feasibility for the caregiver to engage with and complete baseline assessments and access educational materials and community resources and (b) feasibility for the practice to identify potential caregivers/patients, assess eligible patient/caregiver dyads, use patient and caregiver assessments, recruit patient/caregiver dyads, recruit racial and ethnic minorities, use care modules, and engage with the tele-video case conference, (c) net promoter score, (d) acceptability of the intervention to caregivers and patients to participate in the intervention, (e) caregivers feeling heard and understood, and (f) caregiver well-being. DISCUSSION: Testing the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted intervention in these two HBPC practices will provide the basis for future testing and evaluation of a fully powered intervention for PLWD and their caregivers cared for in HBPC with the goal of disseminating high-quality and comprehensive dementia-care focused interventions into HBPC practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05849259 in May 2023.

Community paramedicine in dementia care.

BACKGROUND: Novel hospital diversion strategies are needed to support a growing number of patients with dementia living in the community. One promising model is community paramedicine (CP), which deploys paramedics to the home, who consult with a physician to coordinate treatment and assess disposition. While evidence suggests CP can manage many patients without escalation to the emergency department (ED), no studies have evaluated optimal CP utilization for patients with dementia. Therefore, we compare the use and outcomes of CP for homebound patients with and without dementia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examines 251 homebound patients receiving home-based primary care, who utilized a physician-led CP service between March 2017 and May 2022. Linked electronic health record data included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and CP encounter details. Dementia status and CP outcomes, including rates of ED transport, over-transport (i.e., transported, but not hospitalized), and under-transport (i.e., not transported, but ED visit within 3 days), were determined via chart review. Using logistic regression, we modeled the association of dementia status with over- and under-transport, adjusting for age, sex, and chief complaint. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of CP patients had dementia. Their most common chief complaints were dyspnea (24.3%), altered mental status (17.9%), and generalized weakness (9.8%). We found no significant difference in ED transport rates by dementia status (25.4 vs. 22.8%, p = 0.54). Dementia diagnosis was associated with lower rates of over-transport (OR = 0.21, p = 0.03, CI [0.05, 0.85]) and comparable rates of under-transport (OR = 0.70, p = 0.47, CI [0.27, 1.83]) in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: CP has effectively managed a diverse population of homebound patients with dementia cared for via home-based primary care. Future work should examine potential cost savings and use of CP in dementia care across geographic and healthcare settings.