Risk factors and management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation in diagnostic colonoscopy: a single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diagnostic colonoscopy plays a central role in colorectal cancer screening programs. We analyzed the risk factors for perforation during diagnostic colonoscopy and discussed the treatment outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes of perforation during 74,426 diagnostic colonoscopies between 2013 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital. RESULTS: A total of 19 perforations were identified after 74,426 diagnostic colonoscopies or sigmoidoscopies, resulting in a standardized incidence rate of 0.025% or 2.5 per 10,000 colonoscopies. The majority (15 out of 19, 79%) were found at the sigmoid colon and recto-sigmoid junction. Perforation occurred mostly in less than 1000 cases of colonoscopy (16 out of 19, 84%). In particular, the incidence of perforation was higher in more than 200 cases undergoing slightly advanced colonoscopy rather than beginners who had just learned colonoscopy. Old age (≥ 70 years), inpatient setting, low body mass index (BMI), and sedation status were significantly associated with increased risk of perforation. Nine (47%) of the patients underwent operative treatment and ten (53%) were managed non-operatively. Patients who underwent surgery were often diagnosed with delayed or concomitant abdominal pain. Perforations of rectum tended to be successfully treated with endoscopic clipping. CONCLUSIONS: Additional precautions are required to prevent perforation in elderly patients, hospital settings, low BMI, sedated patients, or by a doctor with slight familiarity with endoscopies (but still insufficient experience). Endoscopic treatment should be actively considered if diagnosis is prompt, abdominal pain absent, and especially the rectal perforation is present.

Single-centre review of the management of intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation in a tertiary oesophageal unit: paradigm shift, short- and long-term outcomes over 15 years.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal perforation is an uncommon surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. The timing and type of intervention is crucial and there has been a major paradigm shift towards minimal invasive management over the last 15 years. Herein, we review our management of spontaneous and iatrogenic oesophageal perforations and assess the short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting with intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation between January 2004 and Dec 2020 in a single tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were identified with oesophageal perforations: 58.1% were male; mean age of 68.28 ± 13.67 years. Aetiology was spontaneous in 42 (56.76%), iatrogenic in 29 (39.2%) and foreign body ingestion/related to trauma in 3 (4.1%). The diagnosis was delayed in 29 (39.2%) cases for longer than 24 h. There was change in the primary diagnostic modality over the period of this study with CT being used for diagnosis for 19 of 20 patients (95%). Initial management of the oesophageal perforation included a surgical intervention in 34 [45.9%; primary closure in 28 (37.8%), resection in 6 (8.1%)], endoscopic stenting in 18 (24.3%) and conservative management in 22 (29.7%) patients. On multivariate analysis, there was an effect of pathology (malignant vs. benign; p = 0.003) and surgical treatment as first line (p = 0.048) on 90-day mortality. However, at 1-year and overall follow-up, time to presentation (≤ 24 h vs. > 24 h) remained the only significant variable (p = 0.017 & p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Oesophageal perforation remains a condition with high mortality. The paradigm shift in our tertiary unit suggests the more liberal use of CT to establish an earlier diagnosis and a higher rate of oesophageal stenting as a primary management option for iatrogenic perforations. Time to diagnosis and management continues to be the most critical variable in the overall outcome.

Endoscopic closure of large colonic perforations with a novel endoscopic clip device: An animal study (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An endoscopic clip device was newly designed to accomplish the closure of large gastrointestinal defects. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of this device in an ex vivo experimental setting. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in porcine colons (n = 5). A large (3-4 cm) linear full-thickness incision was created using a scalpel externally. The device was used for endoscopic closure. The procedure time, number of clips, and success rate of closure were determined. RESULTS: Ten defects were created in five porcine colons (two incisions in each specimen). Successful closure was achieved in all defects. The mean procedure time was 24.30 ± 4.42 min, the mean leak pressure is 28.30 ± 9.49 mmHg, and the mean number of additional conventional hemostatic clips used was 5.10 ± 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that this clip achieved the convenient and reliable closure of large defects in the colon wall in an ex vivo porcine model and seems to be a promising option for closing large gastrointestinal perforations.

Management of iatrogenic perforation during colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis patients: a survey of gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons.

PURPOSE: Patients with ulcerative colitis, a high-risk group for the development of colon cancer, undergo colonoscopy more frequently than the general population. This increase in endoscopic evaluation also exposes these patients to an increased risk of complications, including iatrogenic perforation. Our survey study aims to determine factors that affect the management choices for iatrogenic perforations for ulcerative colitis patients in remission and identify areas of consensus among general gastroenterologists, inflammatory bowel disease specialists, and colorectal surgeons. METHODS: An anonymous, cross-sectional survey was performed using an online platform. A matrix questionnaire posed five clinical scenarios with six management options for an iatrogenic perforation in ulcerative colitis patients with varying disease distribution, disease activity, and maintenance regimens. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight general gastroenterologists, 35 inflammatory bowel disease specialists, and 174 colorectal surgeons responded to the survey; 47, 41, and 23%, respectively, answered they did not feel comfortable managing perforations in ulcerative colitis patients in remission. We found the greatest concordance among gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons in cases of perforation in ulcerative colitis with a history of dysplasia; the majority of respondents chose staged total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. We found discordance in decision making for ulcerative colitis in remission without dysplasia, with perforation occurring in colitis involved and uninvolved areas. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed that a significant fraction of gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons are uncomfortable managing iatrogenic colonic perforations in ulcerative colitis patients. We have identified knowledge and practice gaps in defining the optimal management of iatrogenic perforations in ulcerative colitis patients.

The importance of early recognition in management of ERCP-related perforations.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are rare events, carrying with it a mortality of up to 8%. Given the rarity of this adverse event, there remains limited data and continued uncertainties when choosing therapeutic strategies. Our aims were to evaluate the management of ERCP-related perforations and compare outcomes based on timing of recognition. METHODS: The endoscopic databases of two tertiary care centers were interrogated to identify consecutive adult patients who sustained ERCP-related perforation over a 10-year period from 2006 to 2016. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic data, perforation type, management strategies, clinical data, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: 14,045 ERCP's were performed during our 10-year study period. Sixty-three patients (average age 62.3 ± 2.38 years, 76% female) with ERCP-related perforations were included. Stapfer I perforations were found in 14 (22.2%) patients, Stapfer II in 24 (38.1%), and Stapfer III and IV perforations were identified in 16 (25.4%) and 9 (14.28%), respectively. Forty-seven (74.6%) perforations were recognized immediately during the ERCP, whereas 16 (25.4%) were recognized late. Endoscopic therapy was attempted in 35 patients in whom perforations were identified immediately, and was technically successful in 33 (94.3%). In all, 4 (1 immediate/ 3 delayed) patients required percutaneous drainage and 9 (5 immediate/ 4 delayed) surgery. Length of hospital stay, ICU admission were significantly shorter and incidence of SIRS was significantly lower when perforation was recognized immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate recognition of ERCP-related perforations leads to more favorable patient outcomes; with lower incidence of SIRS, less need for ICU level care, and shorter hospital stay.

Management of a Case of a Large Perforation Repair With Biodentine.

Perforations, which are artificial contact connections among teeth and supporting tissues, have a substantial impact on the success of root canal therapy, whether caused by iatrogenic or pathological causes. This case report describes a 51-year-old female who had intermittent jaw pain that was diagnosed as perforation and was successfully controlled with endodontic intervention following a referral due to procedural problems. The perforation in the furcation zone of a molar was treated with biodentine, demonstrating its sealing, biocompatibility, and tissue restoration properties. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of choosing the right repair materials and techniques based on perforation size and location. Biodentine emerges as a viable option due to its capacity to form a dependable seal in demanding settings.  The study concluded by emphasizing the need for physician competence, tooth morphology understanding, and operative proficiency in preventing and properly treating perforations for the best treatment outcomes.

Repair of Iatrogenic Furcal Perforation With Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Case Report.

In endodontic and restorative procedures, an accidental perforation of the pulp chamber floor or roots presents a considerable risk, potentially leading to persistent inflammatory responses and ultimately tooth loss. Accidental root canal perforations are primary complications encountered by clinicians, requiring either surgical or non-surgical intervention, depending on the severity of the perforation. Over the years, various materials have been utilized for the treatment of such complications, but mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) stands out prominently due to its exceptional biocompatibility, remarkable sealing capacity, and potent antibacterial properties. The unique ability of MTA to set in the presence of moisture facilitates the formation of a robust seal, thereby making it highly effective in managing root perforations and fostering tissue regeneration within the affected area. Its versatility and effectiveness have made MTA a cornerstone material in modern endodontic therapy, offering clinicians a reliable solution for enhancing the long-term prognosis of teeth affected by perforations.

Aetiology, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Oesophageal Perforation: A Review.

Oesophageal perforation (OP) is a life-threatening condition and refers to a tear or disruption in the oesophageal wall. It is considered a medical emergency due to its significant implications, often related to its various causes, such as iatrogenic perforation during endoscopy, Boerhaave syndrome, traumatic injury, foreign body ingestion, and tumour perforation. Early interventions, diagnosis, and a thorough physical examination are essential for better clinical outcomes. Diagnostic procedures and imaging techniques, play a crucial role in confirming OP. The diagnostic workup, based on the index of suspicion, may involve barium oesophagram or contrast-enhanced CT. Once diagnosed, classification of severity using the Pittsburgh clinical severity score guides treatment decisions. Management can be non-surgical or surgical and focuses on a multi-disciplinary approach combining conservative, surgical, or endoscopic methods. Surgical control remains crucial, with the approach dependent on the location of the leak. Improved knowledge of this life-threatening condition is important among healthcare professionals. The objective of this review is to provide information about oesophageal perforation and its early detection, management, and multidisciplinary interventions for optimal patient outcomes.

Iatrogenic Bladder Injury During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Discussion of Anatomic Variations.

Hysterectomy, one of the most common surgical procedures performed in women worldwide, assumes a very important role in the definitive management of diverse gynecologic conditions. This case report presents a compelling instance of an iatrogenic bladder perforation that occurred during laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a 47-year-old woman with a high body mass index, extensive surgical history, and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Despite considerable preoperative planning and the use of minimally invasive techniques, the occurrence of physician-induced bladder perforation highlights the significance of understanding anatomical relationships and variations. The patient's previous abdominal surgeries including two cesarean sections, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy likely contributed to scar formation and adhesions, making dissection challenging. The case report and following discussion delve into anatomical variations, as well as the diagnosis and management of iatrogenic bladder injuries. The presented case serves as a valuable addition to the literature, contributing insights into the challenges and considerations surrounding urinary tract injuries during hysterectomy. This paper aims to review current research and guide practicing obstetricians and gynecologists in the management of intraoperative bladder injuries.

Clinical Success of Iatrogenic Perforation Repair Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Other Materials in Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Aim: This study aimed at systematically reviewing the clinical success of repaired iatrogenic perforations using different materials in primary teeth. Objectives: To compare mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with other biomaterials for the repair of iatrogenic perforations in primary molars during endodontic procedures. Search methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted by using three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) to identify articles that evaluated the different intervention materials for the repair of iatrogenic perforation in primary molars. Selection criteria: The articles reporting perforation repair in primary molars having clinical and radiographic success, as their outcome measures with a follow-up period of at least 1 year were included in this review. Studies and case reports with insufficient or unstated follow-up periods, in vitro, and animal studies were excluded. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers (SM, LM) independently screened all titles and abstracts according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full texts of the selected studies were obtained for the second stage screening. The consensus was achieved by discussion with the third reviewer (AJ). Data extraction included study design, sample size, age of the patient, year of the study, follow-up period, outcome assessment criteria, material for repair, and success and failure. Review results: A total of seven publications were included in this review. Of which, one was case series, three were case reports, and three were interventional studies. The combined success rate of MTA (80.55%) was inferior to other materials-premixed bioceramics, Atelocollagen, and calcium-enriched mixture (96.07%); the same being statistically significant (p = 0.011). Conclusion: Within the limitations of our study, it can be concluded that newer biomimetic materials are superior to MTA for iatrogenic perforation repair in primary molars in terms of clinical success. Clinical significance: This paper is a first-of-its-kind investigation comparing different materials used in the repair of perforations in primary molars. It can be a foundation for further research on the topic. In absence of any available guidelines, the above study can be applied in clinical situations with appropriate judgment and caution. How to cite this article: Mungekar-Markandey S, Mistry L, Jawdekar A. Clinical Success of Iatrogenic Perforation Repair Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Other Materials in Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):610-616.

Combined Open Surgical and Endoscopic Approach for Management of a Meningoencephalocele After Iatrogenic Perforation of the Anterior Skull Base in a Young Infant.

Traumatic iatrogenic perforation of the anterior skull base is a rare complication following endonasal intubation in preterm infants. Subsequent meningoencephaloceles with concomitant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas bear the risk of severe complications, therefore early diagnosis and closure of the skull defect are crucial. However, there is no consensus on the management of such cases of meningoencephaloceles. This case report presents a sophisticated approach of open brain surgery in combination with endonasal endoscopy. A 15-month-old girl presented with a meningoencephalocele and a CSF fistula due to iatrogenic perforation of the left anterior skull base during attempted endonasal intubation after birth. Difficult nasal breathing and an increasing diameter of the skull base defect on imaging controls indicated surgical management. Close multidisciplinary collaboration was essential for diagnosis and decision upon treatment. Open neurosurgical resection and CSF fistula closure combined with endonasal endoscopic removal of the excised meningoencephalocele was performed. Our case report shows that this combined open surgical and endonasal endoscopic approach is a safe procedure in favor of the postoperative outcome and follow-up of the patient.

Iatrogenic esophageal perforation caused by endoscopic dilatation of caustic stricture: Current management and possibility of esophageal salvage.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic esophageal perforation (EP) is an undesirable complication of endoscopic dilatation of caustic esophageal stricture. We reported our current management protocol with possibility of continuing the dilatation program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2020 medical records were reviewed for patients presented with iatrogenic EP. Management according to each case condition was reported. RESULTS: 24 patients were enrolled, aged from 1.5 to 6 years old. Perforation was cervical in one case, abdominal in two cases, and thoracic in 21 cases. Immediate surgical repair was performed in the abdominal cases. Conservative management was chosen in 22 cases; two cases didn't respond and underwent esophageal diversion, and one of them died owing to severe sepsis. Three patients refused another trial of dilatation. Two cases failed to be redilated. 17 patients continued a dilatation program. Time passed between perforation and redilatation ranged from 35 days to 7 months. 15 patients were cured completely from dysphagia, one patient had marked improvement of his dysphagia, and one case with a resistant stricture was referred for esophageal replacement. CONCLUSION: Preserving the native esophagus is possible after iatrogenic EP of caustic esophageal stricture. A conservative approach should be attempted with caution not to endanger patient's life. Level IV of evidence.

Conservative treatment of iatrogenic perforations caused by gastric tubes in extremely low birth weight infants.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations are rare, but life-threatening events in preterm infants. AIM: Aim of the study was to report on incidence, management, morbidity, and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis performed at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Vienna, Austria. SUBJECTS: Extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW, birth weight < 1000 g) with perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) caused by gastric tubes were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: All ELBW infants born within the 6-year study period were identified and their discharge summaries or notes were screened for esophageal and gastric perforations. Data on incidence, management of GIT perforations, morbidity, and mortality were obtained. RESULTS: During a 6-year study period 646 ELBW infants were analyzed. Incidence of perforations was 1.1% (n = 7/646). Median gestational age was 23 + 3 (range: 23 + 0-24 + 5). Perforations occurred on the third day of life (=median, range: day 2-14) and were primarily managed conservatively. Enteral feeding was stopped for 6 days (range: 4-13 days), antibiotic therapy administered for 16 days (range: 8-22 days). In one infant, gastrorrhaphy was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment of upper GIT perforations led to spontaneous recovery without major complications in 85.7%.

Neonatal and pediatric esophageal perforation.

Esophageal perforation (EP) is a rare complication that is often iatrogenic in origin. In contrast with adult patients in whom surgical closure of the defect is preferred, nonoperative treatment has become a common therapeutic approach for EP in neonates and children. Principles of management pediatric EP includes rapid diagnosis, appropriate hemodynamic monitoring and support, antibiotic therapy, total parenteral nutrition, control of extraluminal contamination, and restoration of luminal integrity either through time or operative approaches.

Management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation: From surgery to endoscopy.

Iatrogenic colon perforation is one the most pernicious complications for patients undergoing endoscopic screening or therapy. It is a serious but rare complication of colonoscopy. However, with the expansion of the indications for endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal diseases, the frequency of colorectal perforation has increased. The management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation is still a challenge for many endoscopists. The methods for treating this complication vary, including conservative treatment, surgical treatment, laparoscopy and endoscopy. In this review, we highlight the etiology, recognition and treatment of colorectal iatrogenic perforation. Specifically, we shed light on the endoscopic management of this rare complication.

Esophageal perforation.

Esophageal perforation is uncommon but carries a high morbidity and mortality, particularly if the injury is not detected early before the onset of systemic signs of sepsis. The fact that it is an uncommon problem and it produces symptoms that can mimic other serious thoracic conditions, such as myocardial infarction, contributes to the delay in diagnosis. Patients at risk for iatrogenic perforations (esophageal malignancy) frequently have comorbidities that increase their perioperative morbidity and mortality. The optimal treatment of esophageal perforation varies with respect to the time of presentation, the extent of the perforation, and the underlying esophageal pathologic conditions.