A clinical study on robot navigationassisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures and compare it's efficacy with that of traditional surgical intramedullary nail treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with humeral shaft fractures who received intramedullary nail treatment at our centre from March 2020 to September 2022. The analysis was divided into a robot group and a traditional surgical group on the basis of whether the surgery involved a robot navigation system. We compared the baseline data (age, sex, cause of injury, fracture AO classification, and time of injury-induced surgery), intraoperative conditions (surgery time, length of main nail insertion incision, postoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative bleeding), fracture healing time, and shoulder joint function at 1 year postsurgery (ASES score and Constant-Murley score) between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data or average fracture healing time between the two groups of patients. However, the robotic group had significantly shorter surgical times, longer main nail incisions, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies, and less intraoperative blood loss than did the traditional surgery group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures is a reasonable and effective surgical plan. It can help surgeons determine the insertion point and proximal opening direction faster and more easily, shorten the surgical time, reduce bleeding, avoid more intraoperative fluoroscopy, and enable patients to achieve better shoulder functional outcomes.

Effect of intramedullary nail fixation and internal plate fixation in distal tibia fracture surgery on post-operative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis.

Distal tibial fracture is the most commonly seen type of fracture of the lower extremities. Both intramedullary nail fixation (INF) and plate fixation (PF) have been used to treat distal tibial fractures, but the best way to treat them is still in dispute. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare INF versus PF fixation with respect to the incidence of injury. For studies that have been published between inception and June 2023, a systematic review has been carried out on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Scientific databases. All of the trials that looked at INF and PF-related complications were enrolled. Data from the 13 primary results were analysed with RevMan 5.3. The meta-analyses comprised 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). INF indicates that there is a tendency for patients with distal tibia fractures to reduce the risk of operative site infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40, 3.13; p = 0.0003) after surgery compared with PF. INF resulted in a reduction in total wound complications (OR, 14.20; 95% CI, 1.81, 111.57; p = 0.01) but shortened operation time (mean difference, 13.03; 95% CI, 2.08, 23.99; p = 0.02). In view of these findings, INF seems to be a preferred method of surgery for the treatment of distal tibial fractures with respect to the reduction of post-operative wound complications.

C-reactive protein and tumour diagnosis predict survival in patients treated surgically for long bone metastases.

PURPOSE: Surgical options for long bone metastases include intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Patients with a short life expectancy may benefit from less invasive surgery such as intramedullary nail fixation, while patients with a long life expectancy could be treated with more invasive surgery such as prosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to analyze the survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases, determining the prognostic factors affecting survival and analyzing the surgical complications and reoperation rates. Based on our results, we developed a prognostic score that helps to choose the best treatment for these patients. In addition, we compared the performance of our prognostic score with other previous prognostic models. METHOD: We investigated prospectively potential clinical and laboratory prognostic factors in 159 patients with metastatic bone disease who underwent surgery with intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical data were collected, recording the following data: age and sex of patients, primary tumour and time of diagnosis, number (single or multiple) and presentation (synchronous or metachronous) of bone metastases, presence of visceral metastases. The following laboratory data were analyzed: hemoglobin, leukocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, platelets count, alkaline phosphatase, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Our study showed that pathological C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis were significant negative independent prognostic factors at 12-month survival. Based on our results, we created a score using C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis, creating three different prognostic groups: (A) good prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP with probability of survival at 12 months of 88.9 [80.1-98.5]; (B) bad prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP or good prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 56.7 [45.4-70.7]; (C) bad prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 12.5 [5.0-28.3]. Using ROC multiple analysis, our score (AUC = 0.816) was the most accurate in predicting a 12-month survival compared to previous prognostic models. DISCUSSION: Patients treated surgically for long bone metastases with a life expectancy over 12 months should be treated with more durable reconstruction, while patients with a life expectancy less than 12 months should be treated with less invasive surgery. The diagnosis of primary cancer and C-reactive protein are two very simple data which every orthopaedic surgeon in any community hospital can easily rely on for any decision-making in the surgical treatment of a complex patient as with a patient with skeletal metastases. CONCLUSION: Our prognostic score based on only two simple variables (C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis) was able to predict the 12-month survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases and could be helpful in choosing the best treatment for these patients.

When is hemiarthroplasty preferable to intramedullary prophylactic fixation of malignant lesions of the proximal femur?

BACKGROUND: Malignant hip lesions can be managed operatively by intramedullary (IM) nail fixation and hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 86 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (n = 22) or IM nail fixation (n = 64) for prophylactic treatment of impending pathologic fracture due to malignant lesions of the hip. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression modeling were performed to determine risk of death, fixation failure, pain relief, and return to ambulation without gait aids. RESULTS: Median survival time after surgery was 8.8 months (with no difference in survival between hemiarthroplasty and IM nail [adjusted Hazard Ratio 1.40, CI 0.72, 2.53; P = 0.31]). Hemiarthroplasty was associated with lower risk of pathologic fracture, fixation failure, or reoperation (adjusted HR 0.02, CI < 0.001, 0.48; P = 0.01). Hemiarthroplasty did not increase odds of unassisted ambulation compared to IM nail fixation (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 2.23, CI 0.56, 9.71; P = 0.26). The strongest predictor of postoperative ambulation was preoperative ambulation without aids (adjusted OR 28.9, CI 7.37, 161; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in survival or likelihood of unassisted ambulation after prophylactic femoral fixation with IM nails versus hemiarthroplasty in patients with metastatic disease of proximal femur.

[A prospective study on treatment of Sanders type â ¡ and â ¢ calcaneal fractures with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation system].

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of interlocking intramedullary nail fixation system for Sanders type Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures by comparing with open surgery. Methods: Forty patients (40 feet) with Sanders type Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures, who were admitted between May 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria, were included in the study. They were randomly allocated into control group and minimally invasive group using a random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. The patients were treated with the interlocking intramedullary nail fixation system in the minimally invasive group and with steel plate internal fixation via a lateral L-shaped incision in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in terms of gender, age, fracture classification and side, cause of injury, time from injury to admission, and preoperative width, length, height, Böhler angle, and Gissane angle of the calcaneus. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, hospital stay, fracture healing time, incidence of complications, as well as pre- and post-operative imaging indicators (Böhler angle, Gissane angle, width, height, and length of the calcaneus) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score of foot were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: The incision length, operation time, and hospital stay of the minimally invasive group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss significantly reduced ( P<0.05). All patients of the two groups were followed up, with the follow-up time of 8-12 months (mean, 10.2 months) in the minimally invasive group and 8-12 months (mean, 10.4 months) in the control group. No complication occurred in the minimally invasive group after operation. One case of incision epidermal necrosis and 1 case of traumatic arthritis occurred in the control group after operation. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the AOFAS score was significantly higher in the minimally invasive group than in the control group ( P<0.05). Imaging examination showed that the calcaneal fractures of the two groups healed, and there was no significant difference in healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with preoperative conditions, the Böhler angle and Gissane angle of the calcaneus in the two groups significantly increased, the width narrowed, and the height and length increased at 3 days after operation and the last follow-up, with significant differences ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between 3 days after operation and last follow-up ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point ( P>0.05). Conclusion: The interlocking intramedullary nail fixation system in treatment of Sanders type Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures has the advantages of minimal trauma, shortened hospital stay, reliable fracture reduction and fixation, and satisfactory foot function recovery.

Efficacy comparison between intramedullary nail fixation and plate fixation in distal tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nail (IMN) and plate fixation are the most commonly used surgical modalities for distal tibia fractures. However, the superiority of their efficacy regarding functional outcomes and complications remains controversial. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these two modalities. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of IMN and plate fixation in distal tibia fractures were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library up to January 31, 2024. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effect model for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs comprising 1528 patients were included. Compared with plate fixation, IMN significantly shortened surgery time (WMD=-10.73 min, 95%CI: -15.93 to -5.52), union time (WMD=-1.56 weeks, 95%CI: -2.82 to -0.30), and partial (WMD=-1.71 weeks, 95%CI: -1.91 to -0.43) and full (WMD=-2.61 weeks, 95%CI: -3.53 to -1.70) weight-bearing time. IMN was associated with markedly reduced risk of wound infection (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.63) and secondary procedures (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.55-0.95), but increased the risk of malunion (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.02-2.30) and anterior knee pain (OR = 3.94, 95%CI: 1.68-9.28). The rates of nonunion, delayed union, and functional assessment scores did not significantly differ between the two groups. The percentages of patients obtaining an excellent functional outcome or an excellent and good functional outcome post-operation were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMN and plate fixation are effective modalities for the surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures. IMN seems to be preferred since it confers more advantages, but the elevated rates of malunion and knee pain require attention. The decision on fixation modality should be tailored to the specific fracture, considering these pros and cons.

Robot Navigation System Assisted PFNA Fixation of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

Objective: The incidence of hip fracture in the elderly is increasing. Robot navigation technology has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate. To explore the difference between the clinical effects of proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture and traditional PFNA in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly; analyze the advantages and feasibility of PFNA assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Patients and Methods: From February 2021 to October 2022, the elderly (>65 years old) with femoral intertrochanteric fracture underwent surgery in our center. Divided the patients included in the study into 2 groups based on the surgical method. The surgical method of robot group was PFNA fixation assisted by robot navigation, while the surgical method of traditional group was classic PFNA fixation, Baseline data (general condition, Evans classification, time from injury to operation, preoperative hemoglobin) and observation indicators (intraoperative bleeding, operation time, the length of incision for mail nail insertion, postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate and the Harris score of hip joint 1 year after operation) of the two groups were collected to compare whether there were differences between the two groups. Results: There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative bleeding in the robot group was 68.17±10.66 mL, the intraoperative bleeding in the traditional group was 174±8.11mL (P<0.001). The operation time in the robot group was 68.81 ± 6.89 min, in the traditional group, the operation time was 76.94 ± 8.18 min (P<0.001). The length of incision for mail nail insertion in the robot group was 3.53 ± 0.63 cm, the length of the incision for mail nail insertion in the traditional group was 4.23 ± 0.71 cm (P<0.001). 5 patients (13.9%) in the robot group received blood transfusion treatment, and 13 patients (36.1%) in the traditional group received blood transfusion treatment (P=0.029). The hemoglobin in the robot group decreased by 14.81 ± 3.27 g/l after operation compared with that before operation, while that in the traditional group decreased by 16.69 ± 3.32 g/l (P=0.018). The Harris score of the hip joint of the affected limb in the robot group was excellent in 25 cases, good in 8 cases and poor in 3 cases one year after the operation; In the traditional group, Harris scores were excellent in 18 cases, good in 11 cases and poor in 7 cases (P=0.021). Conclusion: PFNA fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with robot navigation assistance has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate, shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower blood transfusion rate than traditional surgical methods, and has certain advantages in reducing postoperative complications of elderly patients.

Primary stability in locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures may be increased by using an additional nail osteosynthesis in combination with locking plate osteosynthesis-A biomechanical comparison.

BACKGROUND: Stability is regarded as an important factor for proper healing and avoiding secondary dislocation in osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus. Several surgical techniques have been proposed for treatment, including intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and locking plate fixation. This study introduces a novel approach that combines both techniques and compares its primary stability with conventional methods. METHODS: The study involved 25 osteoporotic humeri with two-part fracture models, which were randomly assigned to locking-plate fixation, intramedullary nailing, or a combination of both techniques. The specimens were subjected to sinusoidal loading at 250 N in 20° abduction for 5000 cycles and then to quasi-static loading until failure. Fracture movement, failure mode, and failure load were measured and compared among the groups. FINDINGS: The groups fixated with intramedullary nailing and the groups fixated with intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation showed significantly lower fracture motion than the group using locking plate fixation only (p < 0.005) and significantly higher load to failure (p = 0.007 and p = 0.0062, respectively). There was no significant difference between the group using intramedullary nailing and the group using locking-plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in fracture movement or load-to-failure (p > 0.005). INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that locking plate fixation provides less primary stability than intramedullary nailing or the combined of both techniques. This combined approach may offer advantages as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures in osteoporotic bone, and specific implants should be developed to ensure optimal treatment.

Augmentation of intramedullary nail in unstable intertrochanteric fractures with plate or cable.

Backgrounds: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of intramedullary nail supplemented by buttress plate or cable in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with broken lateral wall. Methods: From May 2015 to January 2022, patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures underwent intramedullary fixations strengthened with buttress plates or cables, which depended on the lateral femur wall fragment type. The clinical and radiographic results were compared between the two groups. The hip function was evaluated according to the Harris Hip Scoring (HHS) system. Results: Forty-one patients who sustained intertrochanteric fracture + broken lateral wall were enrolled. Of these, thirty-four received a minimum of twelve months of follow-ups. No statistically significant differences in baseline and operative data were proved between these groups (p > 0.05). Three patients were observed fat liquefaction after surgery (plate group: 2 cases, cable group: 1 case). All patients could sustain partial/full weight-bearing and no case underwent subsequent operation. The HHS of the last follow-up presented 83.6 ± 4.9 points in the plate group and 83.8 ± 3.7 points in the cable group. Conclusions: Intertrochanteric femoral fracture with broken lateral wall is an unstable injury type, the operative treatments of which have been challenging and controversial over the years. Augmentation of intramedullary nailing system using plate/cable contributes to reconstructing the lateral femur wall.

Analysis of implants for metastatic bone tumors of the proximal femur: A retrospective study.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between surgical techniques used in our hospital to treat metastatic bone tumors of the proximal femur and activity level and prognosis of patients and whether the location of the tumor is considered when selecting surgical techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with metastatic bone tumors of the proximal femur who underwent intramedullary nail fixation (IMN), bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHP) or modular megaprosthesis (MMP) in our hospital from 2007 to 2020. We measured the distance from the center of femoral head to the proximal (x) and distal (y) end of the of tumor, using preoperative computed tomography images to determine the location of metastasis. We also measured revised Katagiri score at the time of fracture, postoperative ISOLS/MSTS (functional outcome) scores, and overall survival. RESULTS: The value of x was significantly different among the three groups. The value of y showed a significant difference between the IMN and BHP groups and the BHP and MMP groups. The functional outcome score was significantly lower in the IMN group. The survival rate of the patient tended to be higher in the BHP and MMP groups than in the IMN group 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: IMN was favored when the distance from the center of femoral head to the proximal end of the tumor was ≥15 mm. In the case of prosthetic replacement, BHP was chosen if the distance from the center of femoral head to the distal end of the tumor was ≤70 mm. BHP and MMP were preferred over IMN functionally.

[Comparison of effectiveness of lower extremity axial distractor and traction table assisted closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in femoral subtrochanteric fracture].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of lower extremity axial distractor (LEAD) and traction table assisted closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fracture. Methods: The clinical data of 117 patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation between May 2012 and May 2022 who met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. According to the auxiliary reduction tools used during operation, the patients were divided into LEAD group (62 cases with LEAD reduction) and traction table group (55 cases with traction table reduction). There was no significant difference in baseline data, such as gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, fracture Seinsheimer classification, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, between the two groups ( P>0.05). Total incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, closed reduction rate, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, weight-bearing activity time, and incidence of complications, as well as hip flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), Harris score, and VAS score at 1 month and 6 months after operation and last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: There were 14 cases in the LEAD group from closed reduction to limited open reduction, and 43 cases in the traction table group. The incisions in the LEAD group healed by first intention, and no complication such as nerve and vascular injury occurred during operation. In the traction table group, 3 cases had perineal crush injury, which recovered spontaneously in 1 week. The total incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and closed reduction rate in the LEAD group were significantly better than those in the traction table group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-44 months, with an average of 15.8 months. In the LEAD group, 1 patient had delayed fracture union at 6 months after operation, 1 patient had nonunion at 3 years after operation, and 1 patient had incision sinus pus flow at 10 months after operation. In the traction table group, there was 1 patient with fracture nonunion at 15 months after operation. X-ray films of the other patients in the two groups showed that the internal fixator was fixed firmly without loosening and the fractures healed. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time, weight bearing activity time, incidence of complications, and postoperative hip flexion and extension ROM, Harris score, and VAS score at different time points between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: For femoral subtrochanteric fracture treated by close reduction and intramedullary nail fixation, compared with traction table, LEAD assisted fracture reduction can significantly shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy frequency, reduce incision length, effectively improve the success rate of closed reduction, and avoid complications related to traction table reduction. It provides a new method for good reduction of femoral subtrochanteric fracture.

Comparing Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis With Interlocking Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Management of Adult Extra-Articular Distal Tibial Fractures: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) fixation are both viable approaches for managing distal tibia fractures. IM nailing offers advantages in terms of shorter operation time, faster union, and reduced infection rates, yet it may lead to alignment issues and residual knee pain. Conversely, MIPPO fixation provides better alignment and minimizes knee discomfort but comes with a higher risk of soft-tissue complications and hardware irritation. Notably, this review reveals that MIPPO is associated with a greater risk of both superficial (15% vs. 7% for IMN) and deep infections (14% vs. 6.3% for IMN). This study aims to comprehensively assess the optimal surgical approaches for distal tibia fractures by comparing clinical and functional outcomes between MIPPO and interlocking IMN techniques in treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures. Key outcome parameters include operation duration, union time, non-union occurrence, malunion cases, infection rates, secondary surgical interventions, and functional results, as indicated by quality of life and ankle scores. Regarding union complications, it is notable that IMN demonstrates a higher incidence of malunion, affecting 14.7% of patients compared to 8.8% in the MIPPO fixation group. Interestingly, both treatment methods exhibit a similar incidence of non-union, occurring in 3.5% of patients in both groups. Furthermore, when assessing the union time, IMN fixation notably achieves significantly shorter union times, especially evident in AO 43A fracture types and closed fractures. The mean time for union is 18 weeks with IMN compared to 20 weeks with MIPPO fixation. In our analysis of nine studies involving 813 patients, the reported operation times revealed an overall weighted mean operation time of 74.1 minutes (ranging from 56.4 to 124 minutes) for IMN and 85.4 minutes (ranging from 51.4 to 124 minutes) for MIPPO fixation. Notably, the operation time for IMN was significantly shorter compared to MIPPO, showing a weighted mean difference (WMD) of -11.24 minutes, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from -15.44 to -7.05 (P<0.05). This difference exhibited significant moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 68%). In light of this comprehensive study, both MIPPO and IMN emerge as equally effective therapeutic options for addressing functional outcomes in distal tibial extra-articular fractures. While IMN offers several advantages, including lower infection rates, reduced implant irritation, shorter operation time, and earlier weight-bearing and union, it is associated with a heightened risk of malunion and anterior knee pain. Consequently, the choice of implant should be tailored on a case-by-case basis. Patients at elevated infection risk, stemming from factors, such as advanced age, comorbidities, smoking, or severe soft tissue injuries, are better suited for nail treatment. Conversely, MIPPO fixation may present a more advantageous choice for young, active, and healthy patients, given its ability to mitigate the risk of knee pain and malunion.

Outcome and complication comparison for intramedullary nail versus open reduction internal fixation in humeral diaphyseal fractures for 2800 matched patient pairs utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

INTRODUCTION: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and intramedullary nail fixation (IMN) are the predominant repair methods for operative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures; however, the optimal method is not fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether IMN or ORIF humeral diaphyseal surgeries result in a significantly higher prevalence of adverse outcomes and whether these outcomes were age dependent. We hypothesize there is no difference in reoperation rates and complications between IMN and ORIF for humeral diaphyseal fractures. METHODS: Data collected from 2015 to 2017 from the Nationwide Readmissions Database were evaluated to compare the prevalence of six adverse outcomes: radial nerve palsy, infections, nonunion, malunion, delayed healing, and revisions. Patients treated for a primary humeral diaphyseal fracture with either IMN or ORIF were matched and compared (n = 2,804 pairs). Patients with metastatic cancer were excluded. RESULTS: Following an ORIF procedure, there was a greater odds of undergoing revision surgery (p = 0.03) or developing at least one of the complications of interest (p = 0.03). In the age-stratified analysis, no significant differences were identified in the prevalence of adverse outcomes between the IMN and ORIF cohorts in the 0-19, 20-39, and 40-59 age groups. Patients who were 60 + had 1.89 times the odds of experiencing at least one complication and 2.04 times the odds of undergoing a revision after an ORIF procedure versus an IMN procedure (p = 0.03 for both). DISCUSSION: IMN and ORIF for humeral diaphyseal fractures are comparable in regard to complications revision rates in patients under the age of 60. Meanwhile, patients 60 + years show a statistically significant increase in the odds of undergoing revision surgery or experiencing complications following an ORIF. Since IMN appears to be more beneficial to older patients, being 60 + years old should be considered when determining fracture repair techniques for patients presenting with primary humeral diaphyseal fractures.

Early results of intramedullary nail fixation in distal tibia oblique osteotomy for the reduction of soft tissue complications.

PURPOSE: During distal tibial oblique osteotomy, external fixators can increase pin site infection risk, whereas plates can cause wound necrosis, necessitating a compromise between soft-tissue position and length. We provide the first report of the early results of intramedullary nail fixation in these osteotomies for avoiding soft tissue complications. METHODS: Ten ankles, classed as Takakura-Tanaka stages 3a to 4 and unclassified and treated via distal tibial oblique osteotomy for ankle osteoarthritis between 2017 and 2021, were included. Osteotomy was performed obliquely from the distal medial tibia to the tibiofibular joint. The distal tibial fragment was rotated distally in the coronal plane for realignment. An intramedullary nail fixation was applied for stabilization. The resulting gap was filled with iliac bone graft. Ankles were evaluated on the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot ankle-Hindfoot Scale and Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire before surgery and at final follow-up. Radiographic assessments were performed. RESULTS: Bone union was achieved within 3 months in all patients. There were no cases of wound necrosis or correction loss postsurgery. Japanese Society scale scores significantly improved from 40.3 ± 15.9 to 87.5 ± 12.6 (P < 0.01). Mean self-evaluation scale scores (pain and pain-related, physical functioning and daily living, social functioning, general health and well-being) improved significantly. shoe-related scores did not change significantly but improved. There was no correction loss after surgery, with an average widening of 24.2 mm and opening angle of 22.6° at the osteotomy site. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that intramedullary nail for fixation of the osteotomy site in distal tibial oblique osteotomy effectively prevents soft tissues complications even in osteotomy sites with large openings.

[Comparative study of the effects of intramedullary nail fixation and minimally invasive percutaneous plate internal fixation technique on platelet activation and serum transforming growth factor-ß1(TGF-ß) 1 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in patients with tibial and fibular fracture].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intramedullary nail fixation (IMN) and minimally invasive percutaneous plate internal fixation (MIPPO) techniques on tibiofibular fractures and their effect on platelet activation and serum transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). METHODS: Total of 105 patients with tibiofibular fractures from February 2019 to February 2020 were selected and divided into 53 cases in the MIPPO group and 52 cases in the IMN group. There were 29 males and 24 females with an average age of (41.74±6.05) years old in MIPPO group;in IMN group, 31 males and 21 females with an average age of (40.59±5.26) years old. The perioperative surgical indexes, postoperative complications, ankle function recovery at 12 months postoperatively, platelet activation indexes at 3 and 7 days preoperatively and postoperatively, and serum TGF-ß1 and BMP-2 levels at 4 and 8 weeks preoperatively and postoperatively were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operating time and fracture healing time in the MIPPO group were shorter than those in the IMN group(P<0.05); Compared with the preoperative period, the levels of GMP-140, PAC-1, CD63, and CD61 increased in both groups at 3 and 7 days after surgery, but were lower in the MIPPO group than in the IMN group(P<0.05);the levels of serum TGF-ß1 and BMP-2 increased in both groups at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery compared with the preoperative period, and the postoperative complication rate in the MIPPO group was lower than that in the IMN group(P<0.05);the difference was not statistically significant in the excellent rate of ankle function recovery at 12 months follow-up after surgery between two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both intramedullary nail fixation and MIPO technique for treatment of tibia and fibula fractures can improve ankle joint function, but the latter has the advantages of short operation time, fast fracture healing, fewer complications, and light platelet activation. Serum TGF-ß1, BMP-2 level improves quickly.

A Comparative Study Between Plate Fixation and Intramedullary Fixation for Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults.

Introduction: Clavicle fractures are frequently encountered by orthopaedic surgeons. Though multiple treatment techniques have been described in literature, open reduction and internal fixation with plating and intramedullary nailing are preferred in adults. This study analyses the functional outcome, complications, duration of bony union of mid-shaft clavicle fractures treated with plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation. Materials and methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 38 patients with mid-shaft clavicle fracture aged between 18 to 60 years at a tertiary care centre in South India. Nineteen patients were treated by plate fixation and 19 patients underwent intramedullary nail fixation. Every alternate patient with mid-shaft fracture clavicle was treated with plate osteosyntheses or nailing. Results: The average age of presentation was 42 years in plate fixation and 31 years in nail fixation group. Robinson's classification type 2B1 was the most common type of fracture in both groups. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score reduced significantly from pre-operative to postoperative day 1 in both the groups but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6, 12 and 24 weeks reduced significantly in both the groups but showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, intramedullary nail fixation group had a shorter duration of hospital stay and showed an earlier improvement in the DASH score during the first six months after surgery. Complications included implant loosening (three patients) in plating group and implant failures (two cases) in nailing group. Conclusion: There is a role for surgical intervention for certain cases of displaced and comminuted clavicle fracture in order to avoid malunion or non-union and their potential long-term sequelae. Both the surgical modalities of plating, and nailing provide good functional outcome and allow early return to occupational activities.

Effects of intramedullary nailing fixation on quality of life and joint function in patients with femoral neck fractures.

OBJECTIVE: This study intended to investigate the changes in quality of life and joint function after intramedullary nailing fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A total of 38 patients with femoral neck fractures received surgical treatment from February 2016 to November 2018 were enrolled as study subjects, and were divided into the intramedullary nailing group (IIN group, n=13) and the plate fixation group (PO group, n=25). The efficacy, general surgical indices, postoperative complications, hip function scores and imaging results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The response rate of the IIN group was 100.00%, significantly higher than 72.00% of the PO group (P<0.05). The length of hospital stay, blood loss, and the length of the healing period in the IIN group were lower than those in the PO group (P<0.05). The incidence of infection, deformity, loosening of internal fixation, and failed internal fixation in the PO group were significantly higher those than in the INN group (P<0.05). At 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the INN group had higher Harris scores and SF-36 scores than the PO group (P<0.05). The response rates of Harris scores of patients in the IIN group were significantly higher than those in the PO group at 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nailing fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures has the advantages of a shorter time in bed and better functional recovery, lower incidence of complications and higher long-term joint function with better quality of life.

Development of a Nomogram to Predict Postoperative Transfusion in the Elderly After Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to explore the risk factors related to blood transfusion after intramedullary nail fixation of elderly femoral intertrochanteric fracture (FTF) and establish a nomogram prediction model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including elderly FTF patients treated by intramedullary nail between January 2017 and December 2019. Perioperative information was obtained retrospectively, uni- and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for blood transfusion. A nomogram model was established to predict the risk of blood transfusion, and consistency coefficient (C-index) and correction curve were used to evaluate the prediction performance and consistency of the model. RESULTS: Of 148 patients, 119 were finally enrolled in the study and and 46 patients (38.7%) received a blood transfusion after the operation. Logistic regression analysis the female, lower preoperative Hb, ASA score >2, general anesthesia, and higher intraoperative blood loss were independently associated with the blood transfusion. The accuracy of the contour map for predicting transfusion risk was 0.910. CONCLUSION: These risk factors are shown on the nomogram and verified. Through the assessment of the risk of blood transfusion and the intervention of modifiable risk factors, we may be able to reduce the blood transfusion rate to a certain extent, so as to further guarantee the safety of the elderly patients during the perioperative period.

Clinical Outcomes of Ready-Made J-Shaped Nail Fixation for Unstable Metacarpal Fractures.

Background: The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes of ready-made J-shaped intramedullary nail fixation for unstable metacarpal fractures. Methods: A total of 25 unstable fractures from 24 patients were evaluated in this retrospective study, comprising 20 metacarpal neck and 5 metacarpal shaft fractures. The mean follow-up was 22 weeks. Functional outcomes were assessed based on the range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated by four projections of the postoperative plain radiographs at the final follow-up, and then were rated as excellent if projections at the fracture site showed no correction loss or angular deformity greater than 10°. Surgery time and complications during the treatments were recorded for each case. Results: All 25 fractures obtained bony union. The mean range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint was 78° (range, 45°-90°). Radiographic outcomes were excellent in 24 (96%) of 25 fractures. Only one fracture had correction loss. The mean surgery time was 29 minutes (range, 14-61 minutes). Two cases had extensor tendon adhesion at the insertion site, which was easily released when the implant was removed. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that intramedullary fixation with a ready-made J-shaped nail is a reliable treatment option for unstable metacarpal fractures.

Anatomic evaluation of radiographic landmarks for accurate straight antegrade intramedullary nail placement in the humerus.

BACKGROUND: Neurovascular insult, nonunion, and iatrogenic rotator cuff injury are concerns when using an intramedullary nail (IMN) for proximal humerus fracture. The purpose of this study was to identify a reproducible starting point and intraoperative imaging for nail insertion optimizing nail depth, tuberosity screw position, and protecting the axillary nerve and rotator cuff insertion. Our hypothesis was that a more medialized starting point would protect soft tissue structures and improve locking screw positioning. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadavers underwent antegrade IMN with Grashey and modified lateral "precipice" view imaging. A guidewire was positioned medial to the coracoacromial ligament (CAL) in 5 cadavers and lateral to the CAL in 5. Distances from the nail entry point to anatomic landmarks were measured. Anatomic and histologic evaluations were performed, characterizing the nail perforation zone. Radiographs were compared between groups. RESULTS: The medial CAL group had a greater distance of screw fixation to the axillary nerve, a shorter distance of greater tuberosity (GT) screw fixation at the rotator cuff insertion on the infraspinatus and teres minor tubercles, and greater screw spread with improved lesser tuberosity capture. Two laterally placed implants violated the rotator cuff tendon. Imaging demonstrated that the ideal starting pin position was medial to the articular margin at a distance equal to the width of the rotator cuff insertion footprint. CONCLUSIONS: Medial placement optimized fixation of the GT, avoided violation of the rotator cuff tendon and footprint, and was associated with an increased distance of proximal locking screw to the axillary nerve.