Randomized Trial of Single-Incision Midurethral Sling and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension: Postoperative Surgical Outcomes and Complications.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Various retropubic and midurethral sling techniques have shown high cure rates in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study aimed to compare single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS) and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) procedures in patients with SUI in terms of the effectiveness, patient satisfaction, surgical complications and results. DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized study. SETTING: A university tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients with clinically and/or urodynamically proven SUI who agreed to surgical treatment were randomized to the SIMS and LBC groups and included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with SIMS and LBC operations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of patients, physical and pelvic examination, preoperative and postoperative clinical findings, Kings Health Questionnaire form, Female Sexual Function Index and Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire form, postoperative day 1 visual analog scale score, and postoperative complications were recorded. Objective and subjective success rates were recorded by re-evaluating the patients in the first and sixth months of the operation. Objective success was defined as having a negative stress test and subjective success was defined as the absence of stress-induced urine leakage after surgery in a validated questionnaire. The primary result of our study was considered to be objective success, whereas the secondary result was subjective success and life quality tests. Twenty patients each in the SIMS group and the LBC group were included in the study. No significant difference was found in objective success (90% vs 85%, p = .633) or subjective success (85% vs 75%, p = .695) between the 2 groups at 6-month follow-up. A significant improvement in life quality was observed in the postoperative period for both groups; however, the difference between the groups was not significant. There was an improvement in sexual function in both groups. Nonetheless, although this improvement was significant in the SIMS group, it was not significant in the LBC group. In addition, surgery time, catheterization time, and hospitalization time were shorter in the SIMS group than in the LBC group. The visual analog scale score on postoperative day 1 was lower in the SIMS group. Groups were not different in terms of preoperative and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study is the first randomized study that compares the LBC and SIMS procedures in the literature. It shows that SIMS and LBC procedures have not different objective and subjective success rates in the short term. It was also observed that they increase both sexual and life quality results in a positive and similar way.

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Using a 3-Trocar System: Tips and Tricks.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for performing laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using a 3-trocar system. DESIGN: This educational video provides step-by-step instructions for performing a laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. This study was exempt from institutional review board approval. SETTING: Midurethral slings are an effective surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence, but not all patients are candidates for, or desire, vaginal mesh. For stress incontinence, nonmesh surgical procedures include pubovaginal fascial slings and retropubic Burch colposuspension. Colposuspension may be performed via an open or laparoscopic approach. As with other minimally invasive surgeries, laparoscopic colposuspension has decreased blood loss, pain, and length of stay with equivalent outcomes at 2 years compared with open procedures. This video describes a technique for performing laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using a 3-trocar system. INTERVENTIONS: A laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is described using a 3-trocar system. Detailed step-by-step instructions are given, along with visualization of pertinent anatomy. Supplies needed for this procedure include a 0-degree, 5-mm laparoscope; two 5-mm trocars, 1 to be placed in the umbilicus and 1 in the left lower quadrant; one 5/12-mm trocar to be placed in the right lower quadrant for passing needles; a closed knot pusher; laparoscopic scissors; and 2 needle drivers. This technique assumes that the primary surgeon (located on the patient's left) is right-handed and that both surgeons can suture and tie knots laparoscopically. Tips are highlighted to ensure safety and ensure successful completion of the procedure. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension offers a nonmesh-based repair for women with stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive approach. It is a reasonable alternative to offer patients with stress urinary incontinence who do not desire repair using vaginal mesh.

Comparative study of two techniques of laparoscopic burch colposuspension using sutures versus mesh in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence.

Background: To compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures (LCS) versus mesh and staples (LCM) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Methods: This randomized study was conducted over a total of 80 women with genuine stress urinary incontinence between January 2020 and April 2022. Women were randomly assigned to the LCS group (n = 40) or the LCM group (n = 40). They underwent objective evaluations, including a standardized stress test, a 24-hour pad test, and a frequency-volume chart. Subjective assessments were made using a quality-of-life questionnaire. Results: The LCS group exhibited superior outcomes in PAD test improvement (from 147 [31-304] to 3 [0-300] at 1 year, p < 0.001), stress test scores (from 82 [11-153] to 1 [0-124] at 1 year, p < 0.001), and mean micturated volume (increase from 294 ± 65 to 321 ± 57 at 1 year, p = 0.037) compared to the LCM group. Urodynamic findings revealed a higher Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure in the LCS group (33.1 ± 6.9) versus the LCM group (28.3 ± 6.4, p = 0.002). Quality of life improvements were significantly better in the LCS group across various domains. However, the LCM group benefitted from shorter surgery duration, hospital stays, and bladder drainage duration. Conclusion: LCS demonstrates significant advantages over LCM in treating female stress urinary incontinence, particularly in cure rates and quality of life improvements. Despite the operational benefits of LCM in terms of reduced surgery and recovery times, LCS offers superior therapeutic outcomes.

Osteitis pubis following laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: A case report.

Osteitis pubis is a condition which predominantly affects young athletes. However, it may also occur following uro-gynecological interventions. We report a case of osteitis pubis following laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. There are several theories on the pathogenesis of postoperative osteitis pubis and a wide variety of treatment options have shown inconsistent outcomes. In our case, the condition was diagnosed radiologically and was managed with antibiotics and analgesics, which resulted in complete recovery.

Cistouretropexia laparoscópica tipo Burch para el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzos: seguimiento a largo plazo / Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Objetivos: Conocer las complicaciones, las tasas de cura subjetiva y valoración con el índice de severidad de Sandvik a largo plazo de pacientes en quienes se realizó cistouretropexia laparoscópica tipo Burch para la corrección de su incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (IUE). Método: Análisis descriptivo, retrospectivo. Nivel de evidencia III. Se incluyeron las pacientes con diagnóstico de IUE tipo Blaivas IIB, a quienes se les practicó Burch laparoscópico en la Clínica del Prado y Profamilia Medellín, entre los años 2003 y 2007. Las variables principales a evaluar fueron edad, tiempo quirúrgico, cura subjetiva, índice de severidad de Sandvik y complicaciones. Resultados: Se analizaron 72 pacientes con promedio de edad de 46,57 +/- 9,54 años. El tiempo promedio de seguimiento fue de 24,4 meses (rango: 9,0-55,8 meses). El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 79,83 minutos (rango: 44-160 minutos). Refirieron cura subjetiva 56 pacientes (77,8 por ciento). El índice de severidad de Sandvik muestra que a largo plazo 56,9 por ciento pacientes estaban secas con remisión completa de los síntomas y el 13,8 por ciento pacientes tenían pérdidas leves. Conclusiones: El Burch laparoscópico es una opción efectiva para el manejo de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo tipo Blaivas IIB. Provee tasas de curación subjetiva a largo plazo similares a otros tipos de tratamiento. Es una opción más a tener en cuenta en el manejo de la IUE, en especial aquellas pacientes con patologías asociadas que se beneficien del abordaje por laparoscopia.

Objectives: To describe the subjective cure rate, the score of the Sandvik test and the complications after laparoscopic Burch in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: Prospective descriptive study. We included all patients diagnosed with SUI Blaivas type IIB, and operated on by laparoscopy in two reference institutions between 2003 and 2007. Results: We analyzed 72 patients with an average age of 46.57 +/- 9.54 years. The average follow-up was 24.4 months, with a minimum of 9 and a maximum of 55.8. The average operating time in 29 patients in which we only performed laparoscopic Burch with or without colporrhaphy was 93.7 minutes (55-180 minutes); 56 patients (77.8 percent) reported subjective cure. The Sandvik's severity index found 56.9 percent dry patients and 13.8 percent with mild losses. Conclusion: The laparoscopic management may be useful in some patients, especially those who will be carried to laparoscopy by some other indication. Subjective cure rates are similar to other types of surgery.