Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuroradiol J ; 34(1): 21-32, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32865127

RESUMO

Orbital lesions in the pediatric population vary from adults in terms of their presentation, unique pathology, and imaging characteristics. The prompt and accurate diagnosis of these lesions is imperative to prevent serious consequences in terms of visual impairment and disfigurement. Along with dedicated ophthalmologic examination, imaging is instrumental in characterizing these lesions, both for accurate diagnosis and subsequent management. In our pictorial essay, we provide a basic review of orbital embryology, anatomy, and congenital orbital pathologies, with emphasis on radiological findings.


Assuntos
Órbita/anatomia & histologia , Doenças Orbitárias/congênito , Doenças Orbitárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Órbita/anormalidades , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Saudi J Ophthalmol ; 33(3): 283-290, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31686971

RESUMO

Rhinosporidiosis is a chronic granulomatous disease affecting the mucous membrane primarily and is caused by Rhinosporidium seeberi, an aquatic protistan parasite. The nose is the most common site of involvement and is seen in 83.3% cases, followed by ocular involvement in 11.2% cases and other sites like larynx, trachea and bronchus in 5.5% cases. In various oculosporidiosis case series, lacrimal drainage system involvement was seen to vary from 14.3% to 59.6% cases. Isolated lacrimal sac involvement in rhinosporidiosis was found in 45.8% (72 out of 157) cases of the lacrimal drainage system in a review of 31 studies. A variety of surgical procedures have been used to treat rhinosporidiosis of lacrimal sac like dacryocystorhinostomy, Dacryocystectomy, lateral rhinotomy and local lesion excision with a success rate varying from 28.5% to 92.3%. This wide variation in the success rate was due to the fact that a uniform surgical procedure was performed in all the cases of a particular series irrespective of the extent of disease. Grading the lacrimal sac rhinosporidiosis to decide the extent of surgical excision may help achieve better results. We present a grading system based on our own experience in a case of extensive rhinospodiosis of lacrimal sac and review of 31 studies published in the literature. A 24-year-old male from Nepal presented with the complaints of watering from his right eye of 13 years duration, swelling in the right medial canthal area with an extension to the inferior part of the orbit for 12 years and nasal blockage for 1.5 years. The patient had a history of previous intervention in which biopsy was taken from the nose and sent for histopathology that confirmed rhinosporidiosis. An extended intranasal endoscopic dacryocystectomy was done along with debridement and coblation of the lesion over the septum and nasopharynx. Intraoperatively a large rhinosporidiosis mass was seen filling the sac and was removed in toto along with the sac and nasolacrimal duct. Recurrence of a tiny lesion after 6 months in our case despite wide excision with the drilling of bony nasolacrimal duct and coblation, made us review the literature.

3.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 64(4): 366-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24294581

RESUMO

EEDCR is a highly rewarding Endoscopic procedure for management of dacryocystitis when epiphora does not respond to medications or repeated syringing of nasolacrimal duct. It is a simple, less time consuming, safe but skilful, highly satisfying surgery both for the patients as well as the surgeons. There is very big advantage of EEDCR, it is close 100% successful procedure, even if there is recurrence of epiphora it is again correctable fully with no residual affects. EEDCR is far more superior to External DCR/Laser DCR and there are definite reasons for it. A total number of 578 cases have been operated by me from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2011, only very few reoccurrences were there and they were corrected easily so much so that it can be said that it is a close 100% successful procedure and best surgical management of DACRYOCYSTITIS up to date. The successful outcome was defined as symptomatic relief from epiphora and dacryocystitis and a patent nasolacrimal duct upon syringing at the end of procedure and on follow up of patient.

4.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 63(1): 40-4, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22319715

RESUMO

The aim of presenting this article is to highlight the factors causing failure in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Understanding these factors will lead to an enhancement in the success rate of endoscopic DCR. Out of 600 cases done in a period of 10 years (from 1998 to 2008), 60 were revision cases. 60 patients referred over a period of 10 years, were selected. The aim was to study the factors causing failure in each case. The cases included were revised in a period of 10 years from 1998 to 2008. These were the cases that were unsuccessful for one or the other reason. The author presents a series of failed DCR cases referred over a period of 10 years. Patients had undergone primary surgery elsewhere and were referred due to the persistence of symptoms. Assessment of all the cases was done with the examination of Eyes and lids for any obvious deformity, watering or purulent discharge in the medial canthal area. ROPLAS test was done as a spot diagnosis for NLD block. This was followed by probing and syringing in the outdoor. All the cases were revised and the likely causes leading to failure of the first surgery were analyzed. It was found that the improper selection of cases accounted for 3.3% of total failed cases; Low rhinostomy accounted for 28.3% cases, inadequate sac opening for 38.3% cases, Pre existing canaliculitis for 1.6% of cases, contracture at the rhinostomy site in 10% cases. Laser burn canalicular scarring for 3.3% of total cases and laxity of the lids and atonic sac was responsible for failure in 3.3% cases. Most of the above factors are secondary to the false localization of the sac, inadequate removal of the sac wall, too much of mucosal removal leading to synaechia formation at the surgical site and inability to detect any additional block with NLD (Nasolacrimal duct) block.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA