RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Otitis is commonly associated with community-acquired bacterial meningitis, but the role of ear surgery as treatment is debated. In this study, we investigated the impact of otitis and ear surgery on outcome of adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis. METHODS: We analyzed episodes of adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis from a nationwide prospective cohort study in the Netherlands, between March 2006 and July 2021. RESULTS: A total of 2548 episodes of community-acquired bacterial meningitis were evaluated. Otitis was present in 696 episodes (27%). In these patients the primary causative pathogen was Streptococcus pneumoniae (615 of 696 [88%]), followed by Streptococcus pyogenes (5%) and Haemophilus influenzae (4%). In 519 of 632 otitis episodes (82%) an ear-nose-throat specialist was consulted, and surgery was performed in 287 of 519 (55%). The types of surgery performed were myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion in 110 of 287 episodes (38%), mastoidectomy in 103 of 287 (36%), and myringotomy alone in 74 of 287 (26%). Unfavorable outcome occurred in 210 of 696 episodes (30%) and in 65 of 696 episodes was fatal (9%). Otitis was associated with a favorable outcome in a multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] .59-.92; P = .008). There was no association between outcome and ear surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Otitis is a common focus of infection in community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults, with S. pneumoniae being the most common causative pathogen. Presence of otitis is associated with a favorable outcome. Ear surgery's impact on the outcome of otogenic meningitis patients remains uncertain.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Meningites Bacterianas , Humanos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Meningites Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/microbiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/mortalidade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Otite/microbiologia , Otite/epidemiologia , Otite/cirurgia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Haemophilus influenzae/isolamento & purificação , Mastoidectomia , Adulto Jovem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that forbids discrimination against individuals with certain disabilities, including hearing impairment. This study aimed to determine the nature of ADA discrimination complaints in individuals with cochlear implants. METHODS: A search for court decisions containing the terms "cochlear implant" and ("Americans with Disabilities Act" or "ADA") from 1985 to 2021 was performed with the Westlaw Campus Research legal database. Cases were included and analyzed if at least one of the plaintiffs had a cochlear implant and was claiming discrimination related to their hearing impairment based on the ADA. RESULTS: 24 cases initiated between 2003 and 2021 in 19 US states were identified based on inclusion criteria. The highest number of cases occurred in California (N = 4, 16.7 %). The alleged discrimination most frequently took place at a K-12 school (N = 9, 37.5 %), workplace (N = 7, 29.2 %), or during an encounter with police/correctional officers (N = 4, 16.7 %). Fourteen (58.3 %) cases involved complaints under Title II (Public Services) of the ADA. Seven (29.2 %) involved Title I (Employment) and 4 (16.7 %) involved Title III (Public Accommodations). Summary judgment was given in favor of the defendant or the case was dismissed entirely in 16 (66.7 %) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Patients with cochlear implants are still at risk of discrimination because of their disability. Cochlear implantees, school employees, workplace supervisors, and law enforcement personnel can benefit from ADA education.
Assuntos
Implantes Cocleares , Pessoas com Deficiência , Perda Auditiva , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Emprego , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Havana Syndrome is used to describe the array of deficits seen in diplomats stationed in Cuba from August 2016 to September 2017.1 Patients from this cohort were clinically studied, investigating their symptoms, audition and vestibular deficits, and imaging abnormalities seen on MRI.1-3 The primary studies were retrospective, looking at how these symptoms could be classified or fit into diagnostic criteria. The cohort had many similarities: a sound at the onset of symptoms, a mix of neurologic and otologic symptoms, and persistent symptoms that lasted for months.1-3 Theories of the cause of Havana Syndrome have led to no conclusive answer. Potential viral etiologies, mass psychogenic illness, and head trauma were examined as causes.1-5 Diseases with established diagnostic criteria were used to compare the patients' symptoms to try to find a disease that fits Havana Syndrome.3 Recent information from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence suggested the most likely cause to be mass psychogenic illness. With the cause of Havana Syndrome still unknown, a review of reported cases and reports helps otolaryngologists understand Havana Syndrome so they diagnose it only when appropriate and do not miss other conditions that may present with similar symptoms and that might respond well to targeted treatment.
Assuntos
Otorrinolaringologistas , Humanos , Síndrome , Cuba/epidemiologia , Masculino , Doença Relacionada a ViagensRESUMO
PURPOSE: The Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is an established active-middle-ear-implant for patients with moderate-to-profound hearing-loss. This surgery is referred to as "Vibroplasty". Sufficient transfer of the VSB's floating-mass-transducers (FMT) energy to the inner ear is a crucial factor influencing the coupling-quality (CQ). However, assessing CQ is hamper by two issues: the method of CQ-assessment itself and the method of FMT-fixation during Vibroplasty. METHODS: This prospective study explored the influence of intraoperative auditory-brainstem-response (+ ABR) measurements and various fixation methods on postoperative CQ after Vibroplasty as compared to matched-patients after Vibroplasty without intraoperative ABR (-ABR). Propensity-score-matching was performed based on preoperative bone-conduction-pure-tone-average-3 (BC-PTA3) at 1-, 2- and 4 kHz. Primary outcome parameters were postoperative CQ-PTA3, intraoperative ABR threshold for various fixation methods and postoperative BC-PTA3. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included, of which 14 were + ABR. Preoperative BC-PTA3, sex, age, and number of previous surgeries did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.301). Mean postoperative CQ-PTA3 was significantly better for + ABR (1.8 vs. 12.3 dB-HL; p = 0.006). Mean intraoperative ABR threshold was superior for cartilage-counter-bearing and cartilage-housing compared to additional fixation with injectable-platelet-rich- fibrin (53 vs. 56 & 57 dB-HL, respectively; p = 0.04; η2 = 0.33). Mean postoperative BC-PTA3 did not significantly differ between patients (41.4 vs. 41.8 dB-HL; p = 0.77). A total of 7% of the patients required intraoperative readjustment of the FMT based on unsatisfactory intraoperative ABR threshold. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ABR measurement resulted in significantly better postoperative CQ. Cartilage-counter-bearing and cartilage-housing were observed to have superior CQ. A total of 7% of the patients could be spared revision-Vibroplasty due to intraoperative ABR measurement.
Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista , Prótese Ossicular , Humanos , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico , Limiar Auditivo/fisiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with advanced congenital cholesteatoma who underwent microscopic or endoscope-combined Canal Wall Up Tympanomastoidectomy (CWUT) in our clinic and to determine the contribution of endoscope use in reducing recurrence/residual rates. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the data of individuals who underwent microscopic or combined endoscopic surgery between 2008 and 2022 in our clinic were scanned from the database. Demographic data, preoperative computed tomography (CT) findings, preoperative and postoperative hearing results, operation and intraoperative status of the ossicles, duration of surgery, postoperative follow-up period, recurrence and residual disease status during follow-up were investigated. RESULTS: The data of 37 pediatric cases operated in our clinic were included in the study. All of the included cases were Potsic Stage 4 patients who underwent CWUT. The mean age of the operated individuals was 8.7 years (5-12 years) and the mean follow-up period was 47.3 months (12-112 months). 19 cases were performed microscopically only, 2 recurrences and 5 residuals were detected. 18 cases were performed combined and 1 recurrence and 1 residual was found. CONCLUSION: In this study, it was determined that using an endoscope together with a microscope in congenital cholesteatoma cases, decreased the rate of recurrence and residual disease by protecting the external auditory canal in patients with advanced mastoid invasion.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature on the pediatric population surgically treated for cholesteatoma and describe the applied post-operative follow-up strategies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the Primary Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement recommendations. After running the selected search string in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, studies in English, reporting on surgically treated pediatric cholesteatoma patients (age younger or equal to 18 year-old) were retrieved. Both primary and revision cholesteatoma surgeries were included. Articles lacking specific data on post-surgical follow-up and case series with less than 10 patients were excluded. RESULTS: Nineteen papers, published between 2000 and 2023, were included for final analysis. Fourteen studies were retrospective and five prospective, for a total of 1319 patients and 1349 operated ears. Male to female ratio was 1.8:1, with a mean age at surgery of 10.4 years (range 1-18). The mean length of the follow-up after surgery was 4.4 ± 1.7 years (range 1-6.9). Clinical follow-up was detailed in 9 studies (47%) with otomicroscopy being the most common evaluation. In most articles (n = 8, 50%), MRI alone was utilized for radiological follow-up, while in 3 studies (19%), CT scans were employed exclusively. In 5 studies (31%), MRI was combined with CT scans. The timing of radiological investigations varied widely (ranging from 6 months to 3 years). A second-look strategy was reported in 14 studies (74%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of the follow-up strategies applied to pediatric patients after cholesteatoma surgery, both in terms of timing and types of investigations.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of piston diameter in patients undergoing primary stapes surgery on audiometric results and postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed. Adult patients who underwent primary stapes surgery between January 2013 and April 2022 and received a 0.4-mm-diameter piston or a 0.6-mm-diameter piston were included. The primary and secondary outcomes were pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiometry, pre- and postoperative speech audiometry, postoperative complications, intraoperative anatomical difficulties, and the need for revision stapes surgery. The pure-tone audiometry included air conduction, bone conduction, and air-bone gap averaged over 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz. RESULTS: In total, 280 otosclerosis patients who underwent 321 primary stapes surgeries were included. The audiometric outcomes were significantly better in the 0.6 mm group compared to the 0.4 mm group in terms of gain in air conduction (median = 24 and 20 dB, respectively), postoperative air-bone gap (median = 7.5 and 9.4 dB, respectively), gain in air-bone gap (median = 20.0 and 18.1 dB, respectively), air-bone gap closure to 10 dB or less (75% and 59%, respectively) and 100% speech reception (median = 75 and 80 dB, respectively). We found no statistically significant difference in postoperative dizziness, postoperative complications and the need for revision stapes surgery between the 0.4 and 0.6 mm group. The incidence of anatomical difficulties was higher in the 0.4 mm group. CONCLUSION: The use of a 0.6-mm-diameter piston during stapes surgery seems to provide better audiometric results compared to a 0.4-mm-diameter piston, and should be the preferred piston size in otosclerosis surgery. We found no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the 0.4- and 0.6-mm-diameter piston. Based on the results, we recommend always using a 0.6-mm-diameter piston during primary stapes surgery unless anatomical difficulties do not allow it.
Assuntos
Audiometria de Tons Puros , Condução Óssea , Otosclerose , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Cirurgia do Estribo , Humanos , Cirurgia do Estribo/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Otosclerose/cirurgia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Prótese Ossicular , Idoso , Desenho de Prótese , Reoperação , Audiometria da FalaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of dizziness and its associated factors in patients with COM at two otologic referral centres in a middle-income country. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Adults with and without COM diagnosis from two otology-referral centres in Bogotá (Colombia) were included. Dizziness and quality of life were assessed using the "Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media Questionnaire-12" (COMQ-12), and sociodemographic questionnaires were applied. Otoscopic evaluation and audiometric data were collected. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 231 adults. RESULTS: Of the 231 participants, up to 64.5% (n = 149) reported at least mild inconvenience due to dizziness. Factors associated with dizziness included female sex (aPR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.46), chronic suppurative otitis media (aPR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.21-7.52), and severe tinnitus (aPR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.24-2.48). An interaction was found between socioeconomic status and educational level, with more frequent reports of dizziness in the middle/high economic status and secondary education (aPR: 3.09; 95% CI: 0.52-18.55; p < 0.001). Differences of 14 points in symptom severity and 18.5 points in the total score of the COMQ-12 were found between the groups with dizziness and without dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Dizziness was frequent in patients with COM and was associated with severe tinnitus and quality of life deterioration.
Assuntos
Otite Média Supurativa , Otite Média , Zumbido , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Otite Média Supurativa/diagnóstico , Tontura , Estudos Transversais , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Otite Média/complicações , Otite Média/diagnóstico , Otite Média/epidemiologia , Vertigem , Doença Crônica , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pathway innovation using smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiometry technologies to deliver ear and hearing services via trained audiologists may improve efficiency of the service. An ENT-integrated-community-ear service (ENTICES-combining community audiology management, remote ENT review and novel technologies) was piloted. We aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of ENTICES. METHOD: ENTICES was a community-based and audiologist-led pathway. Patients with otological symptoms were self-referred to this service. Smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiograms were performed. Two otologists reviewed all decisions made in the community by audiologists based on video-otoscopy, hearing tests and chart reviews. Data on the first 50 consecutive new patients attending either consultant-led hospital otology clinics (HOC), audiologist-led hospital advanced audiology diagnostics (AAD) or ENTICES clinics were collected between 1 August 2021 and 31 December 2021. Data were collected through chart reviews and questionnaires to compare the three pathways with respect to efficiency, patient satisfaction, technology utility and safety. RESULTS: No audiology-led ENTICES decisions were amended by hospital otologists following remote review. Remote review of video-otoscopy with history was sufficient for a diagnosis in 80% of cases. Adding hearing tests and standardised history increased the diagnostic yield to 98%. Patient satisfaction scores showed 100% service recommendation. The cost per patient, per visit, was £83.36, £99.07 and £69.72 for AAD, HOC or ENTICES, respectively. CONCLUSION: ENTICES provides a safe ear and hearing service that patients rated highly. Thirty-two per cent of hospital otology patients were eligible for this service. For those patients, ENTICES is 20% more cost-effective and can reduce the number of clinic visits by up to 60% compared with HOC.
Assuntos
Otolaringologia , Telemedicina , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Otoscopia/métodos , Idoso , Otopatias/diagnóstico , Otopatias/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente , Audiometria , Adolescente , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is an increased demand for well-validated PROMs in otology. This study will systematically assess the methodological quality of all published patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) for patients with multiple ear complaints and to identify the best suitable PROM for use by clinicians treating patients with multiple ear complaints. METHODS: An extensive systematic mapping review of all otology questionnaires was performed to identify questionnaires measuring multiple ear complaints. The 'Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement Instruments' (COSMIN) checklists were used to evaluate the quality of the questionnaire by two researchers. The worst item score per aspect of the methodological assessment counted. RESULTS: Twelve multiple-complaint questionnaires were included in the study for quality assessment. Ten questionnaires were disease-specific (COMQ-12, CES, ZCMEI-21, MD-POSI, PAN-QOL, ETDQ-7, MDOQ, GYSSCDQ, COMOT-15 and DEU-MDDS). Two questionnaires were ear domain-specific (OQUA and COQOL). The majority of multiple complaint questionnaires lacked good design with concept elicitation and patient involvement. CONCLUSION: For the majority of questionnaires, the quality assessment was inadequate as only a few authors consulted with patients affected by the complaints in the development. Modifications of earlier versions of PROMS or combinations of multiple questionnaires lead to ongoing (cross-cultural) validation of these questionnaires albeit mediocre design and validation. The two domain-specific questionnaires are the COQOL and OQUA, both with adequate quality but different focus. COQOL to quantify the quality of life and OQUA to measure and evaluate the severity and impact of ear complaints. [Correction added on 26 January 2024, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, the spelling of the abbreviation COQOL has been corrected in this version.].
Assuntos
Otopatias , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Humanos , Otopatias/diagnóstico , Otopatias/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is defined as persistent discharge through a tympanic membrane perforation for greater than 2 weeks. It is associated with a significant disease burden, including hearing loss, and reducing its incidence could significantly improve short- and long-term health. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of CSOM in children. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies set in community, primary and secondary care settings, identified from Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Children 16 years old and below. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical diagnosis of CSOM. RESULTS: In total, 739 papers were screened, with 12 deemed eligible for inclusion in the systematic review, of which, 10 were included in the meta-analysis. Risk factors examined included perinatal, patient, dietary, environmental and parental factors. Meta-analysis results indicate that atopy (RR = 1.18, 95% CI [1.01-1.37], p = .04, 2 studies); and birth weight <2500 g (RR = 1.79 [1.27-2.50], p < .01, 2 studies) are associated with an increased risk of CSOM development. Factors not associated were male sex (RR = 0.96 [0.82-1.13], p = .62, 8 studies); exposure to passive smoking (RR = 1.27 [0.81-2.01], p = .30, 3 studies); and parental history of otitis media (RR = 1.14 [0.59-2.20], p = .69, 2 studies). CONCLUSION: Optimal management of risk factors associated with CSOM development will help reduce the burden of disease and prevent disease progression or recurrence. The current quality of evidence in the literature is variable and heterogeneous. Future studies should aim to use standardised classification systems to define risk factors to allow meta-analysis.
Assuntos
Perda Auditiva , Otite Média Supurativa , Otite Média , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Feminino , Otite Média Supurativa/complicações , Otite Média Supurativa/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Otite Média/complicações , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
An isolated fracture of the handle of the malleus is a rare entity in otorhinolaryngology and manifests clinically as acute-onset unilateral hearing loss. Several factors may cause this injury, including acute barotraumatic pressure changes or traumatic events. Various therapeutic approaches such as tympanoplasty, autologous graft, or application of bone cement are discussed. We report the case of a 46-year-old female patient who developed acute hearing loss in her left ear after finger manipulation. Clinical evaluation revealed axial displacement of the handle of the malleus and audiometry indicated conductive hearing loss. After otoscopy, audiometry, and computed tomography, tympanoscopy was indicated due to suspicion of ossicular chain disruption. Intraoperatively, an isolated fracture of the handle of malleus was found, which was treated with glass ionomer cement. Following postoperative examination, there was progressive improvement in the acoustic transmission component, such that a normal hearing threshold was observed 4 months postoperatively. This case report underlines the importance of precise diagnosis and individualized treatment for rare middle ear injuries.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with vestibular schwannoma undergoing definitive radiotherapy commonly experience hearing loss due to tumor and treatment effects; however, there is limited data evaluating concurrent medication use and other clinicopathologic factors associated with hearing preservation during and after radiotherapy. We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing consecutive patients from 2004 to 2019 treated with radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma at our institution. METHODS: Ninety four patients with concurrent medications, baseline audiograms, and post-radiotherapy audiograms available were evaluable. We performed chi-squared analyses of the frequency of various clinicopathologic factors and t-tests evaluating the degree of hearing loss based on audiograms. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 35.7 months (mean: 46.5 months), the baseline pure-tone average (PTA) of the ipsilateral ear worsened from 38.4 to 59.5 dB following completion of radiotherapy (difference: 21.1, 95% CI 17.8-24.4 dB, p < 0.001). 36 patients (38.3%) reported regular use of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors (including acetaminophen and NSAIDs) during radiotherapy. The mean increase in PTA was significantly higher for patients taking COX inhibitors (25.8 dB vs 18.1 dB, p = 0.024) in the ipsilateral ear but not for the contralateral side. COX inhibitor use remained independently associated with worse PTA in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: COX inhibitor use during definitive radiotherapy is associated with worse hearing loss in the affected ear but not for the contralateral side. This suggests the ototoxic effects of COX inhibitors may influence the effects of radiotherapy. These results could have clinical implications and warrant further investigation.
Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva , Neuroma Acústico , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Neuroma Acústico/tratamento farmacológico , Neuroma Acústico/radioterapia , Neuroma Acústico/complicações , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Audição , Perda Auditiva/complicações , Surdez/complicações , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Serum levels of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) are promising neuro-axonal damage and astrocytic activation biomarkers. Susac syndrome (SS) is an increasingly recognized neurological condition and biomarkers that can help assess and monitor disease evolution are highly needed for the adequate management of these patients. sNfL and sGFAP levels were evaluated in patients with SS and their clinical relevance in the relapse and remission phase of the disease was assessed. METHODS: As part of a multicentre study that enrolled patients diagnosed with SS from six international centres, sNfL and sGFAP levels were assessed in 22 SS patients (nine during a relapse and 13 in remission) and 59 age- and sex-matched healthy controls using SimoaTM assay Neurology 2-Plex B Kit. RESULTS: Serum NfL levels were higher than those of healthy controls (p < 0.001) in SS patients and in both subgroups of patients in relapse and in remission (p < 0.001 for both), with significantly higher levels in relapse than in remission (p = 0.008). sNfL levels showed a negative correlation with time from the last relapse (r = -0.663; p = 0.001). sGFAP levels were slightly higher in the whole group of patients than in healthy controls (p = 0.046) and were more pronounced in relapse than in remission (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In SS patients, both sNFL and sGFAP levels increased compared with healthy controls. Both biomarkers had higher levels during clinical relapse and much lower levels in remission. sNFL was shown to be time sensitive to clinical changes and can be useful to monitor neuro-axonal damage in SS.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Síndrome de Susac , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida , Filamentos Intermediários/metabolismo , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Recidiva , Síndrome de Susac/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Otological solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) are exceedingly rare. There has been no report of SFT localized to the tympanic membrane. To report on a rare case of solitary fibrous tumor of the tympanic membrane and provide systematic review of the literature pertaining the demographics and pathophysiology of otological SFTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. A search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify English-language articles on solitary fibrous tumor of the ear, with emphasis on the tympanic membrane, published through 2022. A combination of Boolean operators and the following keywords were included in the search strategy: "solitary fibrous tumor", "tympanic membrane", and "ear". RESULTS: We found 12 previous reports of solitary fibrous tumors of the ears, none of which were in the tympanic membrane. All cases underwent surgical resection, with or without perioperative embolization, or radiation. There was no evidence of distant diseases in any cases. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a tympanic membrane mass with associated pain and hearing loss, our findings suggest that solitary fibrous tumor should be included in the differential diagnosis.
Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva , Tumores Fibrosos Solitários , Humanos , Membrana Timpânica , Tumores Fibrosos Solitários/diagnóstico , Tumores Fibrosos Solitários/cirurgia , Tumores Fibrosos Solitários/patologia , DorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate over the optimal surgical approach for cholesteatoma treatment1-5. The aim of this review was to determine whether canal-wall down with mastoid obliteration is associated with favourable outcomes compared to either canal-wall down without obliteration or canal-wall up. The primary outcome was cholesteatoma reoccurrence with secondary outcomes including otorrhoea, reoperation and patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies reporting outcomes of patients undergoing primary CWD-MO for cholesteatoma and directly compared with CWD and CWU mastoidectomies. Data were collated and meta-analysis performed. RESULTS: 2379 patients were included from 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria. CWD-MO was found to be associated with significantly less risk of recurrence when compared to CWU (OR = 0.330 (95 % CI 0.191-0.570, p < 0.001). When compared to CWD, CWD-MO was associate with significantly lower incidence of persistent otorrhoea (OR 0.405 (95 % CI 0.232-0.706, p < 0.001) while the rates of recurrence were comparable (OR: 1.231 [95 % CI: 0.550-2.757] p = 0.613). Otorrhoea rates between CWD-MO and CWU were equivalent as was reoperation. Quality of life and hearing outcomes were variably reported. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that CWD-MO technique achieves lower recurrence rates comparable to CWD approaches and superior to CWU, while offering improved long-term control of otorrhoea. The final procedural choice should be decided based on surgeon experience, skill set and individual patient factors. To address the risk of selection bias, a randomised controlled trial is needed to answer this important research question.
Assuntos
Colesteatoma da Orelha Média , Mastoidectomia , Humanos , Processo Mastoide/cirurgia , Colesteatoma da Orelha Média/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Timpanoplastia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cochlear Implants (CI) are a mainstay in the treatment of severe sensorineural hearing loss with proven cost-effectiveness and improved quality of life. However, costs associated with CI are variable. During the Covid-19 pandemic, elective surgeries decreased. The investigation into how the pandemic affected CI procedures, costs, and demographic utilization has not been elucidated. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System® (PHIS) database, which consists of 50 children's hospitals, was performed. Regions were defined according to PHIS guidelines. We evaluated number of CIs, total charges and costs, Charge to Cost Ratios (CCR), demographic information, and subgrouped this analysis by region throughout 2016-2021. Charges were adjusted by CMS wage index for hospital location. RESULTS: During the years of 2016-2021, there was a rising number of CIs every year except for 2020 which had a decrease, largely driven by the southern and midwestern regions. The median number of cases did not differ between the years. The median adjusted charges increased every year, but not significantly ($103,883-$125,394). The median CCR also did not differ throughout the years (2.7-3.1). Still, there was a larger interquartile range in 2021 (2.3-4.4) for the median CCR compared to all other years (2.1-3.8), particularly in the South. The percentage of white, non-Hispanic/Latino patients who underwent CI was larger in 2020-2021 (78-79.8 %) compared to 2016-2019 (73.3-77.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The number of CIs in 2020 was lower than in 2019 or 2021. The median CCR for CI procedures increased from 2016 to 2021 but not significantly. The range of CCR was larger in 2021 compared to the years prior, suggestive of cost shifting by some hospitals to offset the loss in revenue. There was a small but significant increase in white, non-Hispanic patients receiving CI in 2020 and 2021, suggestive of a socio-economic shift in care post pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Criança , Humanos , Implante Coclear/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , COVID-19/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Compare the audiological results and postoperative outcomes of the endoscopic approach versus the endaural microscopic approach for treatment of attic cholesteatomas, using a randomized prospective model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were consecutively enrolled in the study and randomized into two groups of treatment of 40 patients: Group A -tympanoplasty with a microscopic endaural approach; Group B -tympanoplasty with an exclusive trans-meatal endoscopic approach. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Hearing was assessed preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery in both groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in the parameters analyzed (CT findings, patient age, disease duration, intraoperative cholesteatoma characteristics,) between the group A and B patients. No statistical difference between the two groups regarding hearing improvement, abnormal taste sensation, dizziness, post-operative pain and healing times emerged. Graft success rate was 94.5 % and 92.1 % for MES and ESS respectively. CONCLUSION: Both microscopic and exclusively endoscopic endaural approaches offer similar and excellent results in the surgical treatment of attic cholesteatomas.
Assuntos
Colesteatoma da Orelha Média , Colesteatoma , Humanos , Orelha Média/cirurgia , Colesteatoma/cirurgia , Timpanoplastia/métodos , Endoscopia/métodos , Audição , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colesteatoma da Orelha Média/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of telephone and face-to-face consultations for new otology referrals and discuss the wider use of telemedicine in otology. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including new adult otology referrals to our unit, sampled consecutively between March 2021 and May 2021, seen in either a face-to-face or telephone clinic. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with a definitive management outcome (discharged or added to waiting list for treatment) versus the proportion of patients requiring follow-up for further assessment or review. RESULTS: 150 new patients referred for a routine otology consultation (75 telephone, 75 face-to-face) were included. 53/75 patients (71%) undergoing a face-to-face consultation received a definitive outcome following initial review, versus 22/75 (29%) telephone patients (χ2 < 0.001, OR 5.8). 52/75 (69%) telephone patients were followed up face-to-face for examination. The mean (SD) number of appointments required to reach a definitive outcome was 1.22 (0.58) and 1.75 (0.73) in the face-to-face and telephone cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telephone clinics in otology have played an important role as part of the COVID19 response. However, they are currently limited by a lack of clinical examination and audiometry. Remote assessment pathways in otology that incorporate asynchronous review of recorded examinations alongside audiometry, either conventional or boothless, may mitigate this problem; however, further research is required.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Otolaringologia , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , TelefoneRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to gain in-depth feedback on patient perceptions of remote assessment in otology, to better inform the development of a telemedicine pathway for new otology referrals. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was employed to analyse semi-structured interviews from 14 patients seen in a routine otology clinic. RESULTS: Patients were generally accepting of the proposed telemedicine pathway. Key themes included maintaining quality of care, adequate training for facilitators, reducing waiting times, appropriate actioning of clinic outcomes and anxiety surrounding the use of technology. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed telemedicine pathway for new otology referrals is acceptable to patients, provided there is no compromise in the standard of their care versus a traditional pathway. These results further our understanding of remote assessment in otology from the patient perspective and may help to inform the development of such pathways outside of our centre.