Real-world use of pemigatinib for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the US.

BACKGROUND: Pemigatinib demonstrated efficacy in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-altered cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in the FIGHT-202 trial. However, limited real-world evidence exists on treatment patterns and outcomes in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of US adults who received pemigatinib for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic CCA were collected via retrospective physician-abstracted chart review. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Data from 120 patients (49.2% male; 55.0% White; 19.2% Hispanic; median age at initial pemigatinib prescription, 64.5 years) were collected from 18 physicians/practices. At the time of prescribing, 90.0% of patients had metastatic disease. FGFR2 testing was completed for 92.5% of patients; of those, all but one (result unknown) tested positive, and 95.5% were tested using next-generation sequencing. Pemigatinib was prescribed as second- and third-line therapy among 94.2% and 5.8% of patients, respectively. The most common starting dosage was 13.5 mg daily for 14 days of 21-day cycles (87.5% of patients). Among 60 patients (50.0% of the full cohort) who discontinued pemigatinib during the 6.5-month median study follow-up period, 68.3% discontinued due to disease progression. The median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) from the date of pemigatinib initiation was 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.4-8.6), and the real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was 59.2% (95% CI: 50.0%-68.4%). CONCLUSION: This study complements the FIGHT-202 clinical trial by assessing the use of pemigatinib among a diverse population of patients with CCA under real-world conditions. Findings support the clinical benefit of pemigatinib demonstrated in FIGHT-202.

Pemigatinib for metastatic or surgically unresectable urothelial carcinoma with FGF/FGFR genomic alterations: final results from FIGHT-201.

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations are oncogenic drivers of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Pemigatinib is a selective, oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 with antitumor activity. We report the efficacy and safety of pemigatinib in the open-label, single-arm, phase II study of previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 alterations (FIGHT-201; NCT02872714). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements (cohort A) and other FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort B) were included. Patients received pemigatinib 13.5 mg once daily continuously (CD) or intermittently (ID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally confirmed objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v1.1 in cohort A-CD. Secondary endpoints included ORR in cohorts A-ID and B, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 260 patients were enrolled and treated (A-CD, n = 101; A-ID, n = 103; B, n = 44; unconfirmed FGF/FGFR status, n = 12). All discontinued treatment, most commonly due to progressive disease (68.5%). ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] in cohorts A-CD and A-ID was 17.8% (10.9% to 26.7%) and 23.3% (15.5% to 32.7%), respectively. Among patients with the most common FGFR3 mutation (S249C; n = 107), ORR was similar between cohorts (A-CD, 23.9%; A-ID, 24.6%). In cohorts A-CD/A-ID, median (95% CI) DOR was 6.2 (4.1-8.3)/6.2 (4.6-8.0) months, PFS was 4.0 (3.5-4.2)/4.3 (3.9-6.1) months, and OS was 6.8 (5.3-9.1)/8.9 (7.5-15.2) months. Pemigatinib had limited clinical activity among patients in cohort B. Of 36 patients with samples available at progression, 6 patients had 8 acquired FGFR3 secondary resistance mutations (V555M/L, n = 3; V553M, n = 1; N540K/S, n = 2; M528I, n = 2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events overall were diarrhea (44.6%) and alopecia, stomatitis, and hyperphosphatemia (42.7% each). CONCLUSIONS: Pemigatinib was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements.

Pemigatinib, a selective FGFR inhibitor overcomes ABCB1-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer cells.

P: -glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1) overexpression is one of the primary causes of multidrug resistance (MDR). Therefore, it is crucial to discover effective pharmaceuticals to combat multidrug resistance mediated by ABCB1. Pemigatinib is a selective the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor that is used to treat a variety of solid tumors, Clinical Trials for Urothelial Carcinoma (NCT02872714) completed its research on Pemigatinib. This study aimed to determine whether Pemigatinib can reverse ABCB1-mediated multidrug resistance, as well as its mechanism of action. Pemigatinib substantially reversed ABCB1-mediated multidrug resistance, as determined by a CCK8 assay, and immunofluorescence experiments revealed that Pemigatinib had no effect on the intracellular localization of ABCB1. Pemigatinib was discovered to increase intracellular drug accumulation, thereby reversing multidrug resistance. In addition, Docking analysis revealed that Pemigatinib and ABCB1 have a high affinity for one another. This study concludes that Pemigatinib is capable of reversing the multidrug resistance mediated by ABCB1, offering ideas and references for the clinical application of Pemigatinib.

USP8 promotes the tumorigenesis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via stabilizing OGT.

Ubiquitination was considered to be a crucial factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) development. Herein, we identified Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 8 (USP8) as a key regulator for promoting the tumorigenesis of iCCA cell via stabilizing OGT. USP8 was overexpressed in human tumor tissues and correlated with worse survival. Moreover, the mass spectrometry and co-immunoprecipitation analysis indicated that USP8 interacted with OGT. USP8 worked as a bona fide deubiquitylase of OGT. It stabilized OGT in a deubiquitylation activity-dependent manner. Meanwhile, DUB-IN3, the USP8 inhibitor, could also restrain the malignancy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, USP8 depletion promoted the response of iCCA to pemigatinib. In conclusion, our findings pointed to a previously undocumented catalytic role for USP8 as a deubiquitinating enzyme of OGT. The USP8-OGT axis could be a potential target for iCCA therapy.

Clinical utility of a comprehensive genomic profiling test for patient with advanced biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) comprises a heterogeneous group of malignancies with poor prognosis because of the limited treatment options. With the recent advances of next generation sequencing technologies, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been widely introduced into daily clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter, observation cohort study. The genomic and clinical data of 85 BTC patients, who underwent CGP testing from August 2021 to September 2023, were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 62 (73%) cases in which treatment recommendations were raised during expert meetings, including 34 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 20 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and 8 gall bladder carcinoma (GBC). The drug accessibility rate of the BTC patients was 15.3% (13 cases): ten ICCs, two ECCs, and one GBC. Five ICC patients (three male and two female) with the FGFR2 fusion gene were treated with pemigatinib. Those patients who received a genomically matched therapy had significantly longer median overall survival than those patients who not received. (n = 13; not reached [95% CI not reached-not reached] vs n = 72; 8.6 months [95% CI 6.6-10.0]; hazard ratio 0.24 [95% CI 0.12-0.49], p = 0.013). The median observation period of pemigatinib treatment was 15.4 months (range 10.1-27.4). The responses were classified as PR in three patients, SD in one patient and PD in one patient. The median progression free survival is 9.0 months. No patient had grade 3/4 AEs requiring discontinuation of the treatment. CONCLUSION: The drug accessibility rate of ICC is high and pemigatinib is effective and well-tolerated in ICC patients harboring FGFR2 gene fusions.

A green and highly sensitive microwell spectrofluorimetric method with high throughput for the determination of pemigatinib based on dual fluorescence enhancement by photoinduced electron transfer blocking and micellization: Application to the analysis of tablets, content uniformity testing, and human plasma.

Pemigatinib (PGT) is a recently FDA-approved small molecule kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of relapsed or refractory myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms in adults. This study introduces the development of a first microwell spectrofluorimetric method (MW-SFM) for quantifying PGT in FDA-approved tablets and plasma samples. The method utilized the enhancement of PGT's weak native fluorescence by blocking photoinduced electron transfer (PET) and micellization with sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). The MW-SFM was performed in 96-microwell plates, and fluorescence signals were measured using a fluorescence microplate reader with excitation at 290 nm and emission at 350 nm. The method exhibited a linear range of 2-250 ng mL-1, and a limit of quantitation was 6.5 ng mL-1. The accuracy and precision of the method were confirmed with recovery rates ranging from 96.5% to 102.8% and relative standard deviations of 1.52% to 3.51%. The MW-SFM successfully analyzed Pemazyre® tablets, assessed content uniformity, and analyzed PGT-spiked human plasma samples. The greenness of the MW-SFM was verified using three different metric tools. In conclusion, the proposed MW-SFM is a valuable tool in supporting quality assessment of dosage forms, conducting pharmacokinetic studies, and monitoring therapeutic outcomes.

Targeting FGFRs by pemigatinib induces G1 phase cell cycle arrest, cellular stress and upregulation of tumor suppressor microRNAs.

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene family alterations are found in several cancers, indicating their importance as potential therapeutic targets. The FGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pemigatinib has been introduced in the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma and more recently for relapsed or refractory myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with FGFR2 and FGFR1 rearrangements, respectively. Several clinical trials are currently investigating the possible combination of pemigatinib with immunotherapy. In this study, we analyzed the biological and molecular effects of pemigatinib on different cancer cell models (lung, bladder, and gastric), which are currently objective of clinical trial investigations. METHODS: NCI-H1581 lung, KATO III gastric and RT-112 bladder cancer cell lines were evaluated for FGFR expression by qRT-PCR and Western blot. Cell lines were treated with Pem and then characterized for cell proliferation, apoptosis, production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), and induction of senescence. The expression of microRNAs with tumor suppressor functions was analyzed by qRT-PCR, while modulation of the proteins coded by their target genes was evaluated by Western blot and mRNA. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the various data and student's t test to compare the analysis of two groups. RESULTS: Pemigatinib exposure triggered distinct signaling pathways and reduced the proliferative ability of all cancer cells, inducing G1 phase cell cycle arrest and strong intracellular stress resulting in ROS production, senescence and apoptosis. Pemigatinib treatment also caused the upregulation of microRNAs (miR-133b, miR-139, miR-186, miR-195) with tumor suppressor functions, along with the downregulation of validated protein targets with oncogenic roles (c-Myc, c-MET, CDK6, EGFR). CONCLUSIONS: These results contribute to clarifying the biological effects and molecular mechanisms mediated by the anti-FGFR TKI pemigatinib in distinct tumor settings and support its exploitation for combined therapies.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of pemigatinib (a selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase i clinical trial.

Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]).

Cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib as a second-line treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 fusions in Taiwan: from the evidence of the phase II trial and the perspective of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration.

BACKGROUND: In December 2022, the Taiwan National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) announced the reimbursement of three dosages of pemigatinib 4.5 mg, 9 mg, and 13.5 mg for treating advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions/rearrangements and set the reimbursement price for pemigatinib 4.5 mg at NT$6600. This study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib 13.5 mg as a second-line treatment compared to mFOLFOX and 5-FU chemotherapy for advanced ICC patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements from the perspective of Taiwan's NHIA. METHODS: This study used a 3-state partitioned survival model to analyze the 5 year cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib as a second-line treatment for advanced ICC patients in whom first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed and to compare the results with those for the mFOLFOX and 5-FU chemotherapy regimens. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated from the FIGHT-202 trial (pemigatinib), ABC-06 trial (mFOLFOX), and NIFTY trial (5-FU). The price of pemigatinib 13.5 mg was set at the potentially highest listing price (NT$17,820). Other parameters of utility, disutility, and costs related to advanced ICC were obtained from the published literature. The willingness-to-pay threshold was three times the forecasted gross domestic product per capita in 2022 (NT$2,928,570). A 3% discount rate was applied to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs. Several scenario analyses were performed, including a gradual price reduction for pemigatinib. Deterministic sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), and value of information were performed to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: Pemigatinib was not cost-effective compared to mFOLFOX or 5-FU in the base-case analysis. When the price of pemigatinib was reduced by 50% or more, pemigatinib gained a positive net monetary benefit (mFOLFOX: NT$55,374; 5-FU: NT$92,437) and a 72% (mFOLFOX) and 77.1% (5-FU) probability of being cost-effective. Most of the uncertainty came from the medication cost of pemigatinib, health state utility, and the overall survival associated with pemigatinib. CONCLUSIONS: According to the NCCN guidelines, the daily use of pemigatinib 13.5 mg at the hypothesized NHIA price of NT$17,820/13.5 mg was not cost-effective compared to mFOLFOX or 5-FU. The price reduction scenario suggested a 50% price reduction, NT$8910 per 13.5 mg, for advanced ICC patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements.

This study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of targeted therapy pemigatinib 13.5 mg daily in second-line treatment for Taiwanese patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. This regimen was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) has announced the reimbursement of three pemigatinib dosages of 4.5 mg, 9 mg, and 13.5 mg to be listed in the NHI coverage in 2022. However, as of the middle of April 2023, only the listing price for pemigatinib 4.5 mg has been determined, while pricing for the other two dosages remains pending. Based on a hypothesized NHIA price of NT$17,820/13.5 mg, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pemigatinib 13.5 mg as a second-line treatment for advanced ICC with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements compared to mFOLFOX (a regimen recommended by NCCN) and 5-FU (a regimen fully covered by Taiwan NHIA) and recommended a listing price for NHIA as reference. Our study showed that the hypothesized price of NT$17,820/13.5 mg was not cost-effective compared to mFOLFOX or 5-FU. The price reduction scenario suggested a 50% reduction (NT$8910) in the hypothesized NHIA price for advanced ICC patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements.

FIGHT-101, a first-in-human study of potent and selective FGFR 1-3 inhibitor pemigatinib in pan-cancer patients with FGF/FGFR alterations and advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The phase I/II FIGHT-101 study (NCT02393248) evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of pemigatinib, a potent and selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor, as monotherapy or in combination therapy, for refractory advanced malignancies, with and without fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and receptor (FGFR) gene alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, molecularly unselected patients with advanced malignancies were included in part 1 (dose escalation; 3 + 3 design) to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Part 2 (dose expansion) evaluated the recommended phase II dose in tumors with or where FGF/FGFR activity is relevant. RESULTS: Patients (N = 128) received pemigatinib 1-20 mg once daily intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off; n = 70) or continuously (n = 58). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Doses ≥4 mg were pharmacologically active (maximum tolerated dose not reached; recommended phase II dose 13.5 mg once daily). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was hyperphosphatemia (75.0%; grade ≥3, 2.3%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAE was fatigue (10.2%). Dose interruption, dose reduction, and TEAE-related treatment discontinuation occurred in 66 (51.6%), 14 (10.9%), and 13 (10.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, 12 partial responses were achieved, most commonly in cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5) as well as in a broad spectrum of tumors including head and neck, pancreatic, gallbladder, uterine, urothelial carcinoma, recurrent pilocytic astrocytoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer (each n = 1); median duration of response was 7.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-14.5 months]. Overall response rate was highest for patients with FGFR fusions/rearrangements [n = 5; 25.0% (95% CI 8.7% to 49.1%)], followed by those with FGFR mutations [n = 3; 23.1% (95% CI 5.0% to 53.8%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Pemigatinib was associated with a manageable safety profile and pharmacodynamic and clinical activity, with responses seen across tumors and driven by FGFR fusions/rearrangements and mutations. These results prompted a registrational study in cholangiocarcinoma and phase II/III trials in multiple tumor types demonstrating the benefit of precision therapy, even in early phase trials.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of pemigatinib in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function.

AIMS: Pemigatinib, an inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family of receptor tyrosine kinases, is approved for previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 with minimal renal elimination. METHODS: Separate hepatic and renal impairment studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of these impairments on pemigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK). Each study was of open-label, parallel-group design, conducted in participants with normal organ function and with hepatic or renal impairment. Plasma concentrations of pemigatinib were quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and pemigatinib PK parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios and two-sided 90% confidence intervals of Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Compared with healthy matched participants: Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio (90% confidence interval) in participants with moderate hepatic impairment were 96.7% (59.4%, 157%) and 146% (100%, 212%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with severe hepatic impairment were 94.2% (68.9%, 129%) and 174% (116%, 261%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with severe renal impairment were 64.6% (44.1%, 94.4%) and 159% (95.4%, 264%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before haemodialysis (HD) were 77.5% (51.2%, 118%) and 76.8% (54.0%, 109%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with ESRD after HD were 90.0% (59.3%, 137%) and 91.3% (64.1%, 130%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pemigatinib dose should be reduced for patients with severe hepatic or renal impairment, and no dose adjustment is required for patients with moderate hepatic impairment or in ESRD patients undergoing HD.

Evolution of Treatment in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: Old and New towards Precision Oncology.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignant neoplasm arising in the epithelium of the biliary tract. It represents the second most common primary liver cancer in the world, after hepatocellular carcinoma, and it constitutes 10-15% of hepatobiliary neoplasms and 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. As in other types of cancers, recent studies have revealed genetic alterations underlying the establishment and progression of CCA. The most frequently involved genes are APC, ARID1A, AXIN1, BAP1, EGFR, FGFRs, IDH1/2, RAS, SMAD4, and TP53. Actionable targets include alterations of FGFRs, IDH1/2, BRAF, NTRK, and HER2. "Precision oncology" is emerging as a promising approach for CCA, and it is possible to inhibit the altered function of these genes with molecularly oriented drugs (pemigatinib, ivosidenib, vemurafenib, larotrectinib, and trastuzumab). In this review, we provide an overview of new biologic drugs (their structures, mechanisms of action, and toxicities) to treat metastatic CCA, providing readers with panoramic information on the trajectory from "old" chemotherapies to "new" target-oriented drugs.

Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors: A 2021 update.

Owing to the dysregulation of protein kinase activity in many diseases including cancer, the protein kinase enzyme family has become one of the most important drug targets in the 21st century. There are 62 FDA-approved therapeutic agents that target about two dozen different protein kinases and eight of these were approved in 2020. All of the FDA-approved drugs are orally effective with the exception of netarsudil (a ROCK1/2 non-receptor protein-serine/threonine kinase antagonist given as an eye drop for the treatment of glaucoma) and temsirolimus (an indirect mTOR inhibitor given intravenously for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma). Of the approved drugs, ten target protein-serine/threonine protein kinases, four are directed against dual specificity protein kinases (MEK1/2), thirteen block non-receptor protein-tyrosine kinases, and 35 target receptor protein-tyrosine kinases. The data indicate that 55 of these drugs are prescribed for the treatment of neoplasms (52 against solid tumors including breast, lung, and colon, nine against non-solid tumors such as leukemias, and four against both solid and non-solid tumors: acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, imatinib, and midostaurin). A total of three drugs (baricitinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib) is used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis. Seven of the approved drugs form covalent bonds with their target enzymes and are classified as TCIs (targeted covalent inhibitors). Of the 62 approved drugs, eighteen are used in the treatment of multiple diseases. Imatinib, for example, is approved for the treatment of eight different disorders. The most common drug targets of the approved pharmaceuticals include BCR-Abl, B-Raf, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR), epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), and ALK. The following eight drugs received FDA approval in 2020 for the treatment of the specified diseases: avapritinib and ripretinib (gastrointestinal stromal tumors), capmatinib (non-small cell lung cancer), pemigatinib (cholangiocarcinoma), pralsetinib and selpercatinib (non-small cell lung cancer, medullary thyroid cancer, differentiated thyroid cancer), selumetinib (neurofibromatosis type I), and tucatinib (HER2-positive breast cancer). All of the eight drugs approved in 2020 fulfill Lipinski's rule of five criteria for an orally effective medicine (MW of 500 Da or less, five or fewer hydrogen bond donors, 10 or fewer hydrogen bond acceptors, calculated log10 of the partition coefficient of five or less) with the exception of three drugs with a molecular weight greater that 500 Da: pralsetinib (534), selpercatinib (526) and ripretinib (510). This review summarizes the physicochemical properties of all 62 FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors.

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art of FGFR Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), the second most common type of primary liver tumor, has an increasing incidence in the past few decades. iCCA is highly malignant, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5-10%. Surgical resection is usually the prescribed treatment for patients with early stage iCCA; however, patients are usually in an advanced stage iCCA upon diagnosis. Currently, targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy and other comprehensive treatment measures have been mainly adopted as palliative treatment measures. As a common candidate of targeted therapy, FGFR inhibitors have demonstrated their unique advantages in clinical trials. At present, the prospect of FGFR targeted therapy is encouraging. The landscape of FGFR inhibitors in iCCA is needed to be showed urgently. METHODS: We searched relative reports of clinical trials on FGFR inhibitors in PubMed as well as Web of Science. We also concluded other available clinical trials of FGFR inhibitors (Data were collected from clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Several relatively effective targeted drugs are being used in clinical trials. Some preliminary results indicate the outlook of targeted therapy such as BGJ398, TAS120, and HSP90 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, FGFR targeted therapy has broad prospects for the treatment of iCCA.

Evaluation of drug-drug interactions of pemigatinib in healthy participants.

PURPOSE: Pemigatinib (INCB054828), a potent and selective oral fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3 inhibitor, is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System class II compound with good permeability and pH-dependent solubility that is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Two drug-drug interaction studies, one with acid-reducing agents, esomeprazole (proton pump inhibitor [PPI]) and ranitidine (histamine-2 [H2] antagonist), and the other with potent CYP3A-modulating agents, itraconazole (CYP3A inhibitor) and rifampin (CYP3A inducer), were performed. METHODS: Both were open-label, fixed-sequence studies conducted in up to 36 healthy participants each, enrolled into two cohorts (n = 18 each). Pemigatinib plasma concentration was measured, and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: There was an 88% and 17% increase in pemigatinib area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), respectively, with itraconazole, and an 85% and 62% decrease in pemigatinib AUC and Cmax with rifampin coadministration. There was a 35% and 8% decrease in pemigatinib AUC and Cmax, respectively, with esomeprazole, and a 2% decrease in Cmax and 3% increase in AUC with ranitidine coadministration. In both studies, all adverse events reported were grade ≤ 2. CONCLUSION: Coadministration with itraconazole or rifampin resulted in a clinically significant change in pemigatinib exposure. Therefore, coadministration of strong CYP3A inducers with pemigatinib should be avoided, and the dose of pemigatinib should be reduced if coadministration with strong CYP3A inhibitors cannot be avoided. The effect of PPIs/H2 antagonists on pemigatinib exposure was modest, and pemigatinib can be administered without regard to coadministration of PPIs/H2 antagonists.

Pemigatinib, a potent inhibitor of FGFRs for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

The prognosis of patients affected by cholangiocarcinoma is classically poor. Until recently, chemotherapeutic drugs were the only systemic treatment option available, leading to an overall survival lower than 1 year. In recent decades, different genetic alterations have been identified as playing a key role in the oncogenic signaling. A subgroup of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is characterized by FGFR family mutations, more frequently represented by gene fusions of FGFR2. Based on the results of FIGHT-202 trial, in April 2020 the US FDA approved the FGFR inhibitor pemigatinib in advanced previously treated cholangiocarcinoma patients with FGFR2 rearrangements, opening the way to targeted therapy in this disease. This review summarizes the body of evidence about the efficacy of pemigatinib in cholangiocarcinoma.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors: A review of a novel therapeutic class.

Comprehensive genomic profiling has an emerging role in cancer therapeutics. As treatment options remain needed for advanced cancers, patients are relying increasingly more on tumor genomic alterations as possible targets for cancer treatment. Frequent tumor fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations are seen in many cancers, and include genetic amplifications, mutations, rearrangements and fusions. FGFR inhibitors target these receptor alterations and show promise as a drug class. Currently 2 medications are currently FDA approved: erdafitinib and pemigatinib. Through the FDA accelerated approval process, erdafitinib is indicated to treat metastatic urothelial carcinoma with FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations, whereas pemigatinib is indicated to treat unresectable cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 alterations. Despite growing knowledge about such advanced cancers, treatment is usually palliative. With multiple FGFR inhibitors in the pipeline, further FDA approvals are possible, and it is likely their role in therapy will extend to other cancer types. This review outlines erdafitinib, pemigatinib, their role in cancer, as well as outlining the possible future use of other FGFR inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and other malignancies.

Pemigatinib-induced nail changes - A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Pemigatinib is an FGFR inhibitor that is one of few second-line treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma. Nail toxicities were common in the phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pemigatinib. CASE REPORT: We describe a 54-year-old female with a history of stage IV cholangiocarcinoma presenting for a follow-up visit after completing Cycle 4 of pemigatinib. The patient had been having significant nail changes to her fingernails and toenails, which has led to her great toenails falling off.Management and outcome: The patient was prescribed betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% cream to help with her nail changes and instructed to continue vinegar and hot water soaks that she had already been doing. It was discussed that if this did not help with her nail changes, treatment may have to be held for 2 weeks to allow her nails to heal. DISCUSSION: Nail changes are a common side effect with pemigatinib and should be monitored closely for the need for temporary disruption in therapy.

Targeted Therapies in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Focus on FGFR Inhibitors.

Despite advanced diseases continuing to be associated with grim prognoses, the past decade has witnessed the advent of several novel treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. In fact, CCA has emerged as a heterogeneous group of malignancies harboring potentially druggable mutations in approximately 50% of cases, and thus, molecularly targeted therapies have been actively explored in this setting. Among these, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have reported important results, as witnessed by the FDA approval of pemigatinib in previously treated metastatic CCA patients harboring FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Herein, we provide an overview of available evidence on FGFR inhibitors in CCA, especially focusing on the development, pitfalls and challenges of emerging treatments in this setting.

The role of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of cancers including those of the urinary bladder.

The human fibroblast growth factor family consists of 22 factors and five transmembrane receptors. Of the 22 factors, eighteen are secreted while four of them function exclusively within the cell. Four of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) possess intracellular protein-tyrosine kinase activity while the fifth (FGFRL1) has a short 105-residue intracellular non-enzymatic component. The FGFR protein kinase domain consists of a bi-lobed structure that is similar to that of all other protein kinases. FGFR gene alterations occur in a wide variety of cancers including those of the urinary bladder, breast, ovary, prostate, endometrium, lung, and stomach. The majority (66 %) of FGFR gene alterations involve gene amplifications, followed by mutations (26 %), and rearrangements that produce fusion proteins (8 %). Erdafitinib was the first orally effective FGFR antagonist approved by the FDA (2019) for the treatment of advanced cancer, that of the urinary bladder. FGF23 suppresses phosphate reabsorption in the proximal tubules of the kidney; FGF23 blockade allows phosphate reabsorption to occur and leads to elevated serum phosphate levels. Erdafitinib and several other, but not all, FGFR antagonists produce hyperphosphatemia. Erdafitinib binds to an inactive DGF-Din conformation of FGFR1 and is classified as a type I½ inhibitor. Similarly, dovitinib, AZD4547, CH5183284, infigratinib, lenvatinib, LY2874455, and lucitanib are type I½ inhibitors. The inactive conformations contain an autoinhibitory brake that is made up of three main residues: an asparagine (N) within the αC-ß4 back loop, a glutamate (E) corresponding to the second hinge residue, and a lysine (K) in the ß8-strand (the NEK triad). PDGFRα/ß, Kit, CSF1R, VEGFR1/2/3, Flt3, Tek, and Tie protein kinases are also regulated by a similar autoinhibitory brake mechanism. Ponatinib binds to FGFR4 in a DFG-Dout conformation and is classified as a type II inhibitor. Futibatinib, roblitinib, H3B-6527, fisogatinib, and PRN1371 bind covalently to their FGFR target and are classified as type VI inhibitors. Nintedanib, pazopanib, pemigatinib, rogaratinib, fisogatinib, and PRN1371 are FGFR inhibitors lacking drug-enzyme crystal structures. All of the aforementioned FGFR antagonists are orally effective. The development of FGFR inhibitors has lagged behind those of other receptor protein-tyrosine kinases. However, the FDA approval of erdafitinib for the treatment of urinary bladder cancers may stimulate additional work targeting the many other FGFR-driven neoplasms.