The effect of recombinant versus plasma-derived von Willebrand factor on prolonged PFA closure times in ECMO patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome - an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is applied in patients with respiratory or cardiopulmonary failure, but bleeding is a frequent complication contributing to the high mortality rates in this patient collective. A major factor predisposing patients to bleeding events is an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (aVWS). So far, specific treatment options for this phenomenon are lacking. In hereditary von Willebrand disease (VWD), treatment with recombinant or plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (rVWF or pVWF) is common practice. Closure time measured by the Platelet Function Analyser-200 (PFA-200) is an established assay to detect defects in primary hemostasis and the method is useful to monitor the effect of hemostatic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of recombinant (rVWF) vs. plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (pVWF) on closure times measured by PFA in blood obtained from ECMO patients with aVWS. METHODS: Blood was sampled from thirteen patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and three patients with hereditary VWD. Diagnosis of aVWS was made by conventional coagulation parameters and by multimeric structure analysis. PFA analysis of blood spiked with rVWF or pVWF was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients receiving ECMO were recruited. Ten patients survived and three patients suffered major bleeding complications. PFA closure times in ECMO patients with aVWS spiked with rVWF were significantly shorter at all concentrations than with pVWF (e.g., rVWF vs. pVWF: 1 U/ml: 150.4 ± 21.7 s vs. 263.8 ± 11.7 s; 4 U/ml: 97.8 ± 9.8 s vs. 195.8 ± 15.4 s, p<0.001). PFA closure times were also significantly shorter in three patients with hereditary VWD treated with rVWF compared to pVWF (e.g., 1 U/ml rVWF vs. pVWF: 73.7±1.33 s vs. 231.3±43.4 s, p<0.01) CONCLUSION: In summary, this study shows that rVWF compared to pVWF more effectively reduced PFA closures times in blood samples of ECMO patients with aVWS. Higher doses of VWF are needed to normalize PFA closure time in blood samples of patients with ECMO-induced aVWS compared to hereditary VWD. These data support the use of PFA-200 to monitor hemostatic effects in a future clinical trial involving ECMO patients with aVWS.

Comparison of four methods to assess high-on platelet reactivity under P2Y12 receptor inhibitor.

P2Y12 receptor inhibitors are antiplatelet agents commonly prescribed in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Their efficacy can be limited by high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR), which can be evaluated by different biological assays. Most commonly, HPR is evaluated by flow cytometric vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay, which can be time consuming. To evaluate the potential interest of novel technologies, we compared four different assays. Ninety patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitors were included. Four technologies were evaluated: the current standard test measuring VASP-P by flow cytometry, the historical reference test based on light transmittance aggregation (LTA), and two relatively novel techniques: whole blood multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and platelet function analyzer (PFA), which are less time consuming. The three latter tests were compared with the VASP-P assay as a reference using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis: LTA has an excellent comparability with the VASP test (ROC AUC > 0.9); the other two tests (multiplate and PFA) have only satisfactory comparability (ROC AUC around 0.7) and therefore may not replace the VASP "gold standard" test, if importance is attached to a quantitative assessment of the substitution parameter of VASP. Nevertheless, if a binary approach of the anti-aggregation result is sought, then one can conclude that the three tests are equivalent since Cohen's kappa coefficients are very close for the three tests (k = 0.548 for LTA; k = 0.554 for MEA; k = 0.570 for PFA/P2Y), and a similar proportion of patients are misclassified (15% for LTA, 14% for MEA, and 13.6% for PFA). Discriminant factor analysis using all the parameters provided by each test did not improve the diagnostic performance of MEA or PFA. In conclusion, only LTA shows a good comparability to the VASP assay using ROC curve analysis, probably because misclassified patients have results close to the cutoff values. All three tests have moderate agreement regarding the classification of patients as responders to P2Y12 inhibition.

A comparison of three platelet function tests in ischemic stroke patients with antiplatelet therapy.

Predicting the effectiveness of antiplatelet drugs is critical to precision antiplatelet therapy. However, there is a lack of an acceptable method, although there are a variety of methods for detecting platelet function. In this study, we compared three major platelet function tests to assess their performance and found better methods for platelet function evaluation after aspirin or clopidogrel treatment in ischemic stroke patients by comparative study. A total of 249 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel or both. Three platelet function tests including light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), thromboelastography (TEG), platelet function analyzer (PFA) were performed as well as CYP2C19 genotype determination. Correlation analyses and kappa statistics were used. All three methods were effective in evaluating aspirin function. However, only LTA and TEG had good correlation and consistency (r = -0.37, kappa = 0.634). TEG-ADP was the least sensitive for clopidogrel, as the platelet inhibition ratio did not differ between the clopidogrel-user group and the control (P = 0.074), while LTA and PFA were sensitive (P ＜ 0.001). Correlations between platelet assays were poor for clopidogrel (the absolute value of r range from 0.13 to 0.35) and so was the agreement (Kappa from 0.232 to 0.314). LTA and PFA have a good correlation with CYP2C19 genotyping (P = 0.034 and 0.014). In conclusion, all three tests were able to evaluate aspirin effect, LTA-AA and TEG-AA had a good correlation. TEG perform badly for clopidogrel effect detection. The fair-to-modest agreement among assays indicated further study was indispensable.