Concurrent validity study of QuickDASH with respect to DASH in patients with traumatic upper extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for many upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. In patients with severe traumatic conditions, limited evidence exists regarding the equivalence between DASH and its shortened version, QuickDASH, which is more feasible in clinical practice. The rationale of this study was to analyze the concurrent validity of QuickDASH with respect to DASH in patients with traumatic upper extremity amputation. METHODS: This study is based on a consecutive cohort of traumatic upper extremity amputation patients treated with replantation or revision (completion) amputation at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. We estimated the concurrent validity of QuickDASH with respect to DASH by correlation coefficients, mean score differences, Bland-Altman plots, and distribution density. Additionally, we assessed internal reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item-total correlations. RESULTS: We found a very strong linear correlation between DASH and QuickDASH scores (r = 0.97 [CI 95% 0.97-0.98], p < 0.001). The mean difference between DASH and QuickDASH was minor (MD = -1, SD 4 [CI95% from -1 to 0] p = 0.02). The mean sub-score for the activity domain was higher for QuickDASH than DASH (MD = -3 [CI95% from -4 to -3] p < 0.000) and lower for the symptom domain (MD = 7 [CI95% from 6 to 9] p < 0.000). The Bland and Altman plot showed good agreement between DASH and QuickDASH scores, but there was measurement error in QuickDASH with high scores (r = -0.20, [CI95% from -0.31 to -0.09], p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: QuickDASH demonstrates higher total scores than the full DASH and emphasizes rating of activity over symptoms. Still, on average the differences in total scores are likely less than the MCID of DASH, and consequently, this study shows that QuickDASH can be recommended instead of the full DASH when assessing a traumatic condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Evaluating Factors Associated With Patient-Perceived Applicability of the QuickDASH Survey in Reflecting Their Goals of Care Prior to Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures intend to capture patients' perspectives on their health status. However, the patient-perceived applicability of many of these patient-reported outcome measures is unknown. We hypothesized that patients experiencing greater upper extremity disability and greater pain interference would be more likely to report that the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) survey content is responsive to their daily lives and goals in seeking surgical care. METHODS: Adult preoperative hand surgery patients at a single tertiary academic center were recruited prospectively. QuickDASH, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference computerized-adaptive-testing, and the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)-a validated adult physical activity level metric-data were collected. The following two Likert response questions were also asked: question (1) "How applicable is the above questionnaire to your treatment goals for your upper extremity condition?" and question (2) "How applicable is the overall questionnaire to your daily life?" Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to define the factors associated with patients reporting that the survey was "very applicable." RESULTS: Of the 133 included patients, the mean age was 49 ± 18 years, 40% were women, and the mean GLTEQ score was 54.1 ± 5.5 (consistent with a high level of activity). For questions 1 and 2, 32% and 29% of the patients reported that QuickDASH was "very applicable," respectively. The multivariable model demonstrated that for every 10-point increase in QuickDASH, there was a 45% to 49% greater odds of respondents reporting that the survey was "very applicable," and for every 5-point increase in pain interference computerized-adaptive-testing, the odds increased by 55% to 70%. No association with GLTEQ was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with greater upper extremity disability and pain interference were more likely to find the QuickDASH content to be applicable to their daily lives and goals in seeking surgical care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that QuickDASH may not be an optimal instrument when evaluating upper extremity function in cohorts with mild disability and low pain interference.

Impact of Possible Sarcopenia and Nutritional Status on Postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score in Geriatric Women With Distal Radius Fracture.

PURPOSE: Distal radius fracture (DRF), sarcopenia, and malnutrition have been reported to be interrelated. However, there are few reports on the effects of sarcopenia and malnutrition on DRF patients' postoperative outcomes. This study examined the healthy-side grip strength and preoperative blood tests to determine the presence of possible sarcopenia (PS) and malnutrition in geriatric women with DRF and their impact on postoperative functional outcomes. METHODS: Fifty-five woman older than 60 years treated with volar-locking plate fixation for low-energy DRF from standing-level falls were retrospectively studied. Based on the criteria of The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019, patients with a healthy-side grip strength <18 kg were defined as PS. Nutritional assessment was performed using Onodera's Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) before surgery, with a value <50 defined as malnutrition. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) was used for functional assessment at 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to PS, and patient demographic data and postoperative outcomes were compared. Multiple regression analysis was performed to estimate the regression coefficient and 95% confidence intervals for 1-year QuickDASH after surgery with adjustment for age, PS, and malnutrition. RESULTS: Possible sarcopenia was present in 10 patients (18.2%), and malnutrition in 24 patients (43.6%). Possible sarcopenia patients were older, had lower PNI, serum albumin, and both sides grip strength, and worse QuickDASH compared with non-PS patients. In multiple regression analysis, age, PS, and malnutrition were significant predictors of QuickDASH (standardized coefficient ß, 0.35, 0.34, and 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.02, 3.52-16.49, and 0.50-10.78). CONCLUSIONS: Possible sarcopenia with a healthy-side grip strength <18 kg and malnutrition with a PNI <50 were associated with worse 1-year QuickDASH after surgery in women DRF patients over 60 years. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Ⅳ.

Linking QuickDASH and PROMIS Upper-Extremity Computer-Adaptive Test Scores in Hand Surgery: A Crosswalk Study.

PURPOSE: Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for hand and upper-extremity surgery patients using measures such as the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), as well as general measures including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Physical Function domain via a Computer-Adaptive Test (PROMIS UE CAT), has become commonplace. The aim of this study was to link, for crosswalking, the qDASH measure to both versions of the PROMIS UE CAT (v1.2 and v2.0). METHODS: We included 18,944 hand and upper-extremity patients who completed both versions of the PROMIS UE CAT and the qDASH at the same clinical encounter. Shoulder pathology was excluded. Score linkage was performed using the R package equate, and multiple equating models (linear regression, identity, mean, linear, equipercentile, and circle-arc models) were used to establish crosswalk tables. RESULTS: Mean qDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores were 38.2 (SD = 23.1) and 36.6 (SD = 9.8), respectively. Mean qDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 scores were 37.3 (SD = 21.8) and 38.3 (SD = 10.4), respectively. Pearson correlations had very strong linear relationships between the qDASH and the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 (r = -0.83 [-0.84, -0.92] and r = -0.80 [-0.81, -0.80], respectively). For the equipercentile equating models, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) had very strong positive relationships to linking measures with ICC = 0.85 (0.84, 0.86) for the qDASH-UE CAT v1.2 crosswalk and ICC = 0.83 (0.82, 0.84) for the qDASH-UE CAT v2.0 crosswalk. CONCLUSIONS: The linkages establish crosswalk tables using equipercentile equating models to convert the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and v2.0 scores to the qDASH and vice versa. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides crosswalk tables for commonly collected PROMs in hand surgery, increasing the comparability of results between centers using different PROMs to study the same conditions or treatments.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between people with and without a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis following surgery for traumatic hand injury: a prospective longitudinal study of a multicultural cohort.

BACKGROUND: Following traumatic hand injury, few studies have compared outcomes between people with and without a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis. This study aimed to compare sub-acute outcomes in a multicultural patient cohort with surgically managed traumatic hand injury with and without a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study of people with traumatic hand injury presenting pre- surgically to a high-volume hand injury centre in a region of cultural and language diversity was conducted. Participants were assessed face-to-face (baseline) then via telephone (3-months post-surgery) and categorized according to a pre-morbid medically diagnosed mental health diagnosis. Baseline and follow-up assessments included global mental health, and the EuroQol (EQ) 'Health Today' analogue scale (0-100) and health domains. Return-to-work status, complications/symptomatic complaints, and hand function (QuickDASH) were also collected at follow-up. Adjusted analyses-accounting for covariates including cultural identity-were conducted to determine whether 3-month outcomes were associated with a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis. RESULTS: From 405 eligible patients, 386 were enrolled (76% male, mean age 38.9 (standard deviation 15.6)); 57% self-identified as Australian and 22% had a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis. Common injuries regardless of pre-morbid mental health diagnosis were skin (40%), tendon (17%) and bone (17%) injuries. None were complex mutilating injuries. Seventy-eight per cent of the cohort was followed-up. In adjusted analyses, a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis was associated with lower odds for reporting 'good or better' global mental health (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.23 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.18, 0.47), p < 0.001), 'no' anxiety or depression (OR 0.21 (0.11, 0.40), p < 0.001) and no pain (OR 0.56 (0.31, 0.98), p = 0.04)(EQ domains), and worse EQ 'Health Today' (10 points on average (95%CI -14.9, -5.1, p < 0.001). QuickDASH scores, rates of complications/symptomatic complaints and return-to-work profiles were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reporting worse mental and health-related quality-of-life outcomes post-surgery, people with a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis regardless of cultural identity experienced similar clinical and return-to-work outcomes. Future research assessing the value of screening for pre-morbid mental health conditions on post-surgical outcomes is required and should include people with more complex hand injuries.

Relationship Between Malunion and Short-Term Outcomes of Nonsurgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: Differences Between Early- and Late-Geriatric Patients.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested little association between radiographic malalignment and long-term functional outcomes of nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in geriatric patients. However, no report has stratified the elderly by age and focused on short-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine how the relationship between malunion and patient outcomes differs between early- and late-geriatric patients in the short and long terms after injury, thereby informing explanations and decision-making on treatment options for geriatric patients with distal radius fractures. METHODS: One hundred patients treated nonsurgically for distal radius fractures were evaluated retrospectively; 52 were defined as early-geriatric patients (aged 60-72 years) and 48 as late-geriatric (aged >77 years). Malunion (dorsal tilt > 10°, ulnar variance > 3 mm, or intra-articular displacement or step-off > 2 mm), range of motion, and grip strength were investigated at 3 months. Multiple regression analysis was performed for each age group using Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores at 3 months as the dependent variable. QuickDASH scores over 1 year after injury were analyzed in the same way. RESULTS: The early-geriatric patients included 33 acceptable unions and 19 malunions. The late-geriatric patients included 12 acceptable unions and 26 malunions. The significant predictors of QuickDASH scores at 3 months were malunion for the early-geriatric group and grip strength for the late-geriatric group (standardized coefficient ß, 0.31 and -0.49, respectively). No factor significantly predicted the QuickDASH scores after at least 1 year in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Malunion was associated with worse QuickDASH scores at 3 months after injury in the early-geriatric patients but not in the late-geriatric patients and did not predict the QuickDASH scores at 1 year after injury in either age group. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Self-Reported Physical Function and Grit Are Not Correlated in Patients Who Undergo Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: "Grit" is defined as the perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Thus, grittier patients may have a better function after common hand procedures; however, this is not well-documented in the literature. Our purpose was to assess the correlation between grit and self-reported physical function among patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fractures (DRFs). METHODS: Between 2017 and 2020, patients undergoing ORIF for DRFs were identified. They were asked to complete the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire before surgery and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. The first 100 patients with at least 1-year follow-up also completed the 8-question GRIT Scale, a validated measure of passion and perseverance for long-term goals measured on a scale of 0 (least grit) to 5 (most grit). The correlation between the QuickDASH and GRIT Scale scores was calculated using Spearman rho (ρ). RESULTS: The average GRIT Scale score was 4.0 (SD, 0.7), with a median of 4.1 (range, 1.6-5.0). The median QuickDASH scores at the preoperative, 6-week postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative time points were 80 (range, 7-100), 43 (range, 2-100), 20 (range, 0-100), and 5 (range, 0-89), respectively. No significant correlation was found between the GRIT Scale and QuickDASH scores at any time. CONCLUSIONS: We found no correlation between self-reported physical function and GRIT levels in patients undergoing ORIF for DRFs, suggesting no correlation between grit and patient-reported outcomes in this context. Future studies are needed to investigate the influence of individual differences in character traits other than grit on patient outcomes, which may help better align resources where needed and further the ability to deliver individualized, quality health care. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Evaluation of Preoperative Factors Affecting Midterm Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition: A Prognostic Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative patient-reported outcomes as predictors of functional improvement following ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. We hypothesized that high levels of preoperative pain interference (PI) and upper-extremity disability are associated with lower magnitudes of functional improvement ≥1 year after surgery on the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) (primary outcome) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (UE) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) (UE CAT) v1.2 (secondary outcome). METHODS: Adult patients who underwent ligament reconstruction tendon interposition between February 2014 and April 2018 at an academic tertiary institution were considered for inclusion in this longitudinal cohort study. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and ≥1 year after surgery. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the magnitude of functional improvement on the QuickDASH and UE CAT. RESULTS: Among 93 included participants, the mean age was 61 ± 7 years, and 75 (81%) were women. At 2.5 ± 1.0 years after surgery, the QuickDASH and UE CAT improved by a mean of 24.5 ± 20.9 and 9.9 ± 10.7 points, respectively. In the primary multivariable model, a greater preoperative QuickDASH (indicative of lower function; coefficient, 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 0.9) and lower preoperative Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PI CAT (eg, less pain interference; coefficient, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2) were associated with greater QuickDASH improvement independent of potential confounders. In the secondary multivariable model, lower preoperative UE CAT (indicative of worse function; coefficient, -0.9; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.7) and lower preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PI CAT (coefficient, -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1) were associated with greater UE CAT improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative patient-reported outcomes may be useful in understanding the degree of improvement that certain patient populations can expect from ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. Those with lower baseline (preoperative) upper-extremity function and PI are expected to derive the greatest functional improvement in the midterm. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Automating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the overall response rate of patients receiving electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) following hand surgery and to determine the patient characteristics associated with responding. METHODS: A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, web-based system was developed to automatically distribute ePROMs to patients undergoing hand surgery at five institutions with 22 surgeons. Patients who were at least 18 years old were eligible. The PROMs used were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH). After surgery, ePROMs along with a satisfaction questionnaire were electronically sent three, six, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 6458 patients were eligible. Of these, 80% were enrolled voluntarily. Among these, 70% completed ePROMs for at least one postoperative time point, whereas 30% did not complete any. Among responders, 28% completed all five time points, whereas 72% completed four or fewer time points. Incomplete responders were more likely to be insured by workers' compensation when compared to complete responders. Incomplete responders exhibited higher baseline QuickDASH scores and similar baseline VAS compared to complete responders. During the follow-up, incomplete responders demonstrated worse VAS and QuickDASH scores at all time points. Finally, in comparison with complete responders, incomplete responders were less likely to be satisfied with their surgery at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that automated email-based ePROM systems may be an effective method for survey distribution. Particularly for simple, outpatient surgeries, this study illustrates the potential for clinical use of the data obtained from these systems. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patient-reported outcome measures continue to have an expanding role in health care with the rise of valued-based systems. Electronic PROMs are a relatively unexplored medium that may offer a viable alternative to more effectively collecting these valuable patient metrics.

The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition.

PURPOSE: Achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on an outcomes instrument and reporting satisfaction with surgical outcomes are not equivalent. We hypothesized that improvement exceeding the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT MCID is associated with a greater likelihood of reporting satisfaction with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) treatment. Our secondary hypothesis was that a subset of patients failing to meet MCID would still be satisfied. METHODS: Patients ≥1 year after LRTI at one academic tertiary institution were included. QuickDASH and UE CAT v1.2 scores were obtained before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction and levels of improvement in pain and function were also obtained. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients completed the QuickDASH, and of those, 90 also completed the UE CAT. At a mean of 2.6 ± 1.0 years after surgery, QuickDASH and UE CAT score improvement exceeded the previously published MCID estimates of 8.8 and 4.8. Although 90% (84/93) of the patients reported satisfaction, only 85% (72/93) and 72% (59/90) achieved MCID on the QuickDASH and UE CAT, respectively. Using the MCID estimate of 8.8, 96% (72/75) of the patients meeting the MCID were satisfied with their treatment. Those failing to achieve MCID reported significantly less physical function and pain improvement; however, most were satisfied nonetheless (68% [13/19] for QuickDASH, 77% [23/30] for UE CAT). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving published MCID thresholds on the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 was predictive of patients reporting general satisfaction with their LRTI outcome ≥1 year after surgery. Most patients failing to achieve MCID still reported satisfaction with their LRTI. Achieving MCID thresholds alone should not be used as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with their treatment. Patient satisfaction is a complicated construct that is potentially very different from that of high-quality care. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Clinical and functional outcome after partial or total claviculectomy without reconstruction for oncologic causes.

BACKGROUND: To achieve clear margins in rare malignant clavicular neoplasms, claviculectomy may become necessary. This study aimed to review clinical, functional, and oncologic outcomes following partial or total claviculectomy without reconstruction. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 15 patients from 2 tertiary sarcoma centers (mean age, 42.6 ± 20.3 years; 66.7% male patients). The median length of clinical and oncologic follow-up was 48.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24.0-83.5 months). Functional follow-up (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and QuickDASH score [short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire]) was available in 9 patients at a median of 36.0 months (IQR, 20.0-100.0 months). RESULTS: Of the 15 patients, 7 underwent total claviculectomy; 5, partial lateral claviculectomy; and 3, partial medial claviculectomy. No postoperative complications emerged. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and QuickDASH scores at latest follow-up amounted to 26.0 points (IQR, 24.0-29.0 points) and 18.0 points (IQR, 11.0-22.0 points), respectively. Notably, scores tended to be lower in patients who underwent total claviculectomy (n = 2) in comparison to partial claviculectomy (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical and functional results can be achieved following partial or total claviculectomy without reconstruction, with a low complication rate and acceptable mid- to long-term function.

Objective and subjective assessment of Dupuytren's contracture.

This paper describes the evaluation options of Dupuytren's contracture by subjective and objective methods. There are various classification schemes named after their authors, including graphical representation for objective evaluation of the disease. Subjective assessment was performed in the form of a questionnaire for patients. The QuickDASH with a small specification for Dupuytren's contracture is the most commonly used questionnaire. The Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme questionnaire appears to be a higher specification. The classifications allow evaluation of treatment success to determine prognosis of the disease. The analysis of articles is based on PubMed search from the years 1967-2022, with 28 relevant articles were retrieved. Based on this analysis, the Tubiana classification appears to be the most appropriate one for patients with Dupuytren's contracture. Of patient questionnaires, the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme meets these parameters.

Efficient and precise Ultra-QuickDASH scale measuring lymphedema impact developed using computerized adaptive testing.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the QuickDASH for use in assessment of limb function in patients with upper extremity lymphedema using modern psychometric techniques. METHOD: We conducted confirmative factor analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis to examine the assumption of unidimensionality for IRT model on data from 285 patients who completed the QuickDASH, and then fit the data to Samejima's graded response model (GRM) and assessed the assumption of local independence of items and calibrated the item responses for CAT simulation. RESULTS: Initial CFA and Mokken analyses demonstrated good scalability of items and unidimensionality. However, the local independence of items assumption was violated between items 9 (severity of pain) and 11 (sleeping difficulty due to pain) (Yen's Q3 = 0.46) and disordered thresholds were evident for item 5 (cutting food). After addressing these breaches of assumptions, the re-analyzed GRM with the remaining 10 items achieved an improved fit. Simulation of CAT administration demonstrated a high correlation between scores on the CAT and the QuickDash (r = 0.98). Items 2 (doing heavy chores) and 8 (limiting work or daily activities) were the most frequently used. The correlation among factor scores derived from the QuickDASH version with 11 items and the Ultra-QuickDASH version with items 2 and 8 was as high as 0.91. CONCLUSION: By administering just these two best performing QuickDash items we can obtain estimates that are very similar to those obtained from the full-length QuickDash without the need for CAT technology.

Can Generic Outcome Questionnaires Replace QuickDASH in Monitoring Clinical Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures?

PURPOSE: In contrast to region-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), generic PROMs can be argued to have an added benefit of enabling cost-utility analyses and allowing for comparisons to be made across different conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness and strength of the association between region-specific and generic PROMs in patients treated operatively for a displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture. METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 166 patients aged 18-70 years with a displaced intra-articular fracture of the distal radius were treated with either a volar locking plate or external fixation augmented by K-wires and followed-up prospectively for 2 years. The main outcome measure was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, but EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) were also employed. The associations between the QuickDASH score and EQ-5D and between the QuickDASH score and SF-36 were assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: There was a significant positive association between the QuickDASH score and EQ-5D and between the QuickDASH score and SF-36 throughout the follow-up period, although wide dispersion existed for the outcome measures at an individual level. However, the association between the QuickDASH score and SF-36 was significantly weaker at 6 weeks and 3 months than that at baseline, indicating that EQ-5D more closely mirrors changes in the QuickDASH score in the early postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that the QuickDASH score and EQ-5D correlate well on a group level, but large individual variations exist. The SF-36 had decreased sensitivity for the changes in the QuickDASH score at 6 weeks and 3 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings indicate that generic PROMs cannot fully replace the region-specific QuickDASH score when evaluating the outcomes of distal radius fractures.

Establishing the Substantial Clinical Benefit in a Non-Shoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population for the QuickDASH and PROMIS Upper Extremity and Physical Function Computer Adaptive Tests.

PURPOSE: It is unclear what score changes on the abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Hand, and Shoulder (QuickDASH), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive test (CAT), and PROMIS physical function (PF) CAT represent a substantial improvement. We calculated the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for these 3 instruments in a non-shoulder hand and upper extremity population. METHODS: Adult patients treated between March 2015 and September 2019 at a single academic tertiary institution were identified. The QuickDASH, PROMIS UE CAT v2.0, and PROMIS PF CAT v2.0 scores were collected using a tablet computer. Responses to the QuickDASH both at baseline and follow-up 6 ± 4 weeks later, and a response to the anchor question "Compared to your first evaluation at the University Orthopaedic Center, how would you describe your physical function level now?" were required for inclusion. A second anchor question querying treatment-related improvement was also used. The SCB was calculated using an anchor-based approach comparing the mean change difference between groups reporting no change and a maximal change for both anchor questions. RESULTS: Of 1,119 included participants, the mean age was 48 ± 17 years, 53% were women, and half were recovering from surgery. Score changes between baseline and follow-up were significantly different between groups reporting no improvement and maximal improvement on both anchor questions. The SCB values ranged between 16.9 and 22.8 on the QuickDASH, 5.9 and 7.1 on the UE CAT, and 3.5 and 6.7 on the PF CAT. CONCLUSIONS: These score improvements for the QuickDASH, UE CAT, and PF CAT represent a substantial clinical improvement in a non-shoulder hand and upper extremity population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These SCB estimates may assist with the interpretation of outcome scores at a population level.

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Tests.

PURPOSE: It is unclear what score thresholds on patient-reported outcomes instruments reflect an acceptable level of upper extremity (UE) function from the perspective of patients undergoing hand surgery. The purpose of this study was to calculate the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) UE Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), version 2.0, in a population who underwent hand surgery. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent hand surgery between February 2019 and December 2019 at a single academic tertiary institution were identified. QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT version 2.0 scores were collected 1 year after surgery, as were separate symptom- and function-specific anchor questions that queried the acceptability of patients' current state. Threshold values predictive of a patient reporting an acceptable symptom state (PASS[+]) were calculated for both instruments using the 75th percentile score for patients in the PASS(+) group and the Youden Index as determined by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were included. QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT scores differed significantly between the PASS(+) and PASS(-) groups. The 75th percentile method yielded PASS values of <16 for the QuickDASH and >43 for the PROMIS UE CAT for both anchor questions. The ROC analysis yielded PASS estimates of <15.9 to <20.5 for the QuickDASH and >38.1 to >46.2 for the PROMIS UE CAT, with ranges calculated from differing threshold values for each of the 2 anchor questions. The ROC-based estimates demonstrated high levels of model discrimination (area under the curve ≥ 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: We propose PASS estimates obtained using the 75th percentile and ROC methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Specifically, PASS values in the range of 15.9-20.5 for the QuickDASH and 38.1-46.2 for the PROMIS UE CAT version 2.0 should be used when interpreting outcomes at a population level.

Influence of Occupational Hand Force Requirements on Return to Work, Pain, and Disability After Trapeziometacarpal Total Joint Arthroplasty: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the prognosis after trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty for basal thumb osteoarthritis with respect to sustainable return to work (RTW), pain, and disability. Our main hypothesis was that high occupational hand force requirements are related to slower RTW. METHODS: We conducted a 12-month follow-up study of patients who were treated with a trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty in 2003 to 2015 and were active in the labor market at the time of surgery. We used registry information about RTW. Before surgery and at the 12-month follow-up, we obtained data on pain and disability. To obtain estimates of occupational hand force requirements for individual patients, we linked the patients' self-reported job title to a job exposure matrix based on experts' ratings. We used Cox regression models to analyze the time until sustainable RTW and logistic regression models to analyze pain and disability. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included. Most patients returned to work within 12 months after surgery (86%). For those who returned to work within 12 months (n = 114), mean time until sustainable RTW was 14 weeks (SD, 9 weeks). Higher hand force requirements were associated with slower RTW (for medium- and high-force requirements, adjusted hazard ratios were 0.48 [95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.78] and 0.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.69]). Occupational hand force requirements were not associated with pain and disability at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: High occupational hand force requirements were associated with slower RTW, but not with pain and disability 12 months after surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic I.

Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Version 2.0 in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population.

PURPOSE: Our primary purpose was to calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) version 2.0 (v2.0) for a nonshoulder hand and upper extremity population. Secondarily, we calculated the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT v2.0 and the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) MCID. METHODS: Adult patients treated by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained hand surgeons between March 2015 and September 2019 at an academic tertiary institution were identified. The PROMIS UE CAT v2.0, PROMIS PF CAT v2.0, and QuickDASH were collected via tablet computer. Inclusion required response to at least 1 of the instruments at both baseline and follow-up (6 ± 4 weeks), and a response to the anchor question: "Compared to your first evaluation at the University Orthopaedic Center, how would you describe your physical function level now?" An additional anchor question assessing treatment-related improvement was also asked. The MCID was calculated using an anchor-based approach using the mean change difference between groups reporting no change and slight change for both anchor questions, and with the 1/2 SD method. RESULTS: Of 2,106 participants, mean age was 48 ± 17 years, 53% were female, and 53% were recovering from surgery. Of these patients, 381 completed the PROMISE UE CAT v2.0, 497 completed the PROMIS PF CAT v2.0, and 2,018 completed the QuickDASH. The score change between baseline and follow-up was significantly different between anchor groups for both anchor-based MCID calculations. Anchor-based MCID values were 3.0 to 4.0 for the UE CAT, 2.1 to 3.6 for the PF CAT, and 10.3 for the QuickDASH. The MCID values per the 1/2 SD method were 4.1, 4.1, and 10.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We propose MCID ranges of 3.0 to 4.1 for the PROMIS UE CAT v2.0, and 2.1 to 4.1 for the PROMIS PF CAT v2.0. The observed QuickDASH MCID values (10.2-10.3) are within the range of previously published values. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These MCID estimates will aid in interpreting clinical outcomes and in powering clinical studies.

Evaluating the performance of PROMIS and QuickDASH instruments in an intercollegiate Division 1 athlete population.

BACKGROUND: Athletes demonstrate high levels of physical function, leading to difficulties in patient-reported outcome scoring and interpretation. In particular, the ability of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to adequately discriminate between high levels of upper extremity function-that is, the ceiling effect-is limited. This study evaluated performance characteristics of the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) survey and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) metrics in a population of Division 1 intercollegiate athletes, with specific attention to ceiling effects. METHODS: At a single institution, Division I intercollegiate athletes cleared for full participation in the 2018-2019 season were eligible. The following PROs were collected prospectively via tablet computer: PROMIS upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive test (CAT), PROMIS physical function (PF) CAT, QuickDASH, and QuickDASH Sports/Performing Arts Module. Descriptive statistics, and ceiling and floor effects, were calculated. The proportion of athletes with maximal scores on each PRO were compared to normative values using the 1-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: A total of 268 participants were included; the mean age was 19.9 ± 1.5 years, 49% were female, and 61% were overhead athletes. Large ceiling effects were observed for the UE CAT (46%), QuickDASH (58%), and QuickDASH Sports Module (82%). The PF CAT demonstrated a relatively low ceiling effect of 6.7%. Athlete scores were all significantly better than published age-matched values from a normative population for all instruments, with the exception of no difference on the QuickDASH for males. DISCUSSION AND/OR CONCLUSION: The PROMIS UE CAT and QuickDash instruments are limited in their ability to assess and discriminate upper extremity function in highly functioning individuals such as Division I athletes. The PROMIS PF CAT, a measure of general physical function, did not suffer from a large ceiling effect.

Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) in Hand Surgery: Does a One-Question Outcome Instrument Compare Favorably?

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used to measure patient status, impairments, and disability, but often require lengthy surveys and place a considerable burden on patients. We hypothesized that the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), composed of a single question, would be a valid and responsive instrument to provide a global assessment of hand function. METHODS: The SANE, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE), and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) data are routinely collected electronically in our hand and upper-extremity center. To identify our cohort, we used Current Procedural Terminology codes to query our electronic medical record research data repository for the 7 most common hand surgery procedures performed over 2 years from December 2016 to 2018. These procedures included carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty, wrist arthroscopy, distal radius fracture fixation, first dorsal compartment release, and cubital tunnel release. Patients undergoing a single isolated procedure with questionnaires obtained in the preoperative and/or postoperative period were included in the analysis. Convergent validity, coverage, and responsiveness for each instrument were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 214 patients for inclusion. The SANE score had a moderate to strong correlation with the QuickDASH and PROMIS-UE. Floor and ceiling effects for the SANE were less than 10% at baseline and follow-up. Overall, the QuickDASH was the most responsive, followed by SANE and PROMIS-UE; all 3 instruments exceeded the acceptable thresholds for responsiveness and demonstrated significant changes before to after surgery. Responsiveness of the SANE varied by procedure and was acceptable for carpal tunnel release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, wrist arthroscopy, and trigger finger release. CONCLUSIONS: The single-item SANE is a reasonable measure of global function in patients undergoing common hand procedures and demonstrates psychometric properties comparable to those of the PROMIS-UE and QuickDASH outcome scores. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SANE score is a reasonable outcome measure of global hand function that may have utility in demonstrating response to treatment in a practice setting and may provide a useful adjunct to multiple-item measures in clinical research studies.