A cross-sectional study evaluating patients' preferences for Salter innominate osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Residual acetabular dysplasia in children after reduction of hip dislocation is often treated using Salter innominate osteotomy to prevent future osteoarthritis. Preventive surgery for asymptomatic patients, which could result in overtreatment, should be carefully applied with consideration of patients' opinions. In this study, we aimed to describe opinions on Salter innominate osteotomy as preventive surgery for children among adult patients who had undergone periacetabular osteotomy for hip pain due to hip dysplasia. METHODS: A mail-in questionnaire survey was conducted with 77 patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy. Participants responded whether they would recommend Salter innominate osteotomy as preventive surgery for children and the reason for their opinion. We also performed a patient-based evaluation using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire and assessed clinical outcome measures with the Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Their recommendations and reasons were evaluated, and associations between their opinions and demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (56%) responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 10 (23%) patients recommended undergoing Salter innominate osteotomy, 28 (65%) patients did not, and 5 (12%) patients responded they were undecided. No significant association was observed between their opinions and demographic/clinical characteristics evaluated in the survey. The most frequent reason for why they do not recommend Salter innominate osteotomy was related to uncertainty about future hip pain. CONCLUSIONS: In total, 65% of the study participants did not recommend Salter innominate osteotomy for children with risk of dysplasia in the future. Participants' preferences regarding preventive surgery were not influenced by demographic and clinical characteristics.

Intrapelvic Kirschner wire Migration following Developmental Dysplasia of Hip Surgery and Laparoscopic Removal.

Salter innominate osteotomy remains the most commonly performed pelvic osteotomy for the Developmental Dysplasia of Hip in children after 18 months of age up to six years. Kirschner wire (K- wire) is used to fix the bone graft across the osteotomy site. Of the several complications of the pelvic osteotomy, K- wire migration into the pelvis is rare and only a few case reports are reported. We present a case of a 2-year-old girl with Right sided Developmental Dysplasia of Hip who underwent Femoral shortening and Salter innominate osteotomy, presented three months later with intrapelvic migration of k-wire. Paediatric Surgery consult was obtained and K-wire was removed laparoscopically without any complications successfully.

Salter Innominate Osteotomy for The Management of Developmental Dysplasia of The Hip in Children: Radiographic Analysis.

Background: There are a variety of described osteotomies to address acetabular dysplasia in children with Developmental Dysplasia of The Hip (DDH). This study will analyze the radiographic outcome of cases diagnosed with DDH and treated with a Salter innominate osteotomy. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent Salter innominate osteotomy between January 2017 and January 2019 at our institution was performed. 48 procedures (44 patients were evaluated for acetabular index (AI) and center edge angle (CEA) based on the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and the most recent pelvic x-ray. Results: 48 procedures (44 patients) were radiologically evaluated. The AI improved from 34° preoperatively to 19.9° on the final follow up radiograph and the CEA improved from - 2.4° preoperatively to 24.6° on the final follow up radiograph. Conclusions: In our hands, use of Salter innominate osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia in patients with DDH was associated with good radiological outcomes. The Salter innominate osteotomy was able to improve lateral acetabular coverage of the hip to almost near-normal radiographic values. Type of Study/Level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Petit-Morel method for hip development dysplasia in toddlers: A retrospective observational study in 34 patients.

BACKGROUND: The Petit-Morel method allows the treatment of developmental hip dysplasia in toddlers by combining gradual traction to achieve reduction followed by immobilisation during which pelvic osteotomy is performed. The objective of this study was to assess the radiographic and clinical outcomes in a retrospective cohort of patients. HYPOTHESIS: The Petit-Morel method is associated with low rates of avascular necrosis and residual acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity, as well as with satisfactory medium-term clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of 34 patients (35 hips) treated between 1997 and 2014. The radiological assessment criteria included an evaluation for avascular necrosis classified according to Kalamchi and MacEwan, the vertical centre edge (VCE) angle, femoral head sphericity according to Mose, and acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity according to Severin. Hip function was assessed by determining the Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score. RESULTS: Mean age at treatment was 19±4 months (range, 14-29). Mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 5-20). There were two failures including one case of recurrent dislocation requiring surgical reduction. Group II avascular necrosis occurred in 1 (3%) patient. Tönnis Grade IV dysplasia was significantly associated with resolving irregularity of the ossification centre, seen in 19 (54%) cases (p=0.002). In the 18 patients followed-up to skeletal maturity, with a mean follow-up of 15 years (range, 12-20 years), 17 hips were Severin Class I. The mean VCE angle was 29° (range, 15°-38°), and the head was spherical for 34 (98%) hips. The PMA score at last follow-up was excellent (17-18). The mean VCE angle was greater in all 5 patients who experienced pain during long walks (35° [range, 32°-37°]) than in the asymptomatic patients (28° [range, 15°-38°]) (p=0.009). DISCUSSION: The Petit-Morel method is a reliable treatment that provides good clinical and radiological outcomes. Overcorrection of the VCE angle was noted in the patients who experienced walking-related pain in adulthood. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective observational cohort study.

Factors associated with an unfavourable outcome after Salter innominate osteotomy in patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip: does occult dysplasia of the contralateral hip affect the outcome?

Salter innominate osteotomy is an effective reconstructive procedure for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but some children have a poor outcome at skeletal maturity. In order to investigate factors associated with an unfavourable outcome, we assessed the development of the contralateral hip. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients who underwent a unilateral Salter osteotomy at between five and seven years of age, with a mean follow-up of 10.3 years (7 to 20). The patients were divided into three groups according to the centre-edge angle (CEA) of the contralateral hip at skeletal maturity: normal (> 25°, 22 patients), borderline (20° to 25°, 17 patients) and dysplastic (< 20°, 7 patients). The CEA of the affected hip was measured pre-operatively, at eight to nine years of age, at 11 to 12 years of age and at skeletal maturity. The CEA of the affected hip was significantly smaller in the borderline and dysplastic groups at 11 and 12 years of age (p = 0.012) and at skeletal maturity (p = 0.017) than in the normal group. Severin group III was seen in two (11.8%) and four hips (57.1%) of the borderline and dysplastic groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Limited individual development of the acetabulum was associated with an unfavourable outcome following Salter osteotomy.

Comparing caudal and intravenous ketamine for supplementation of analgesia after Salter innominate osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Previous studies claim that caudal administration of ketamine causes effective analgesia. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of ketamine after caudal or intravascular administration in pediatric patients that underwent orthopedic surgery to distinguish between local and systemic analgesia. METHODS: After the induction of general anesthesia, 36 patients, aged 18 months to 10 years, assigned to undergo orthopedic surgery, received a caudal injection of bupivacaine and were randomly blinded into two groups: one group received 1 mg/kg S(+)-ketamine as the caudal group and the other group received 1 mg/kg S(+)-ketamine as the intravascular group. Postsurgical measurements included the effectiveness of postsurgical analgesia, which was assessed by using the observational pain scale (OPS), duration of analgesia, sedation score, and hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring. RESULTS: The mean time to first analgesia was clearly longer in the caudal ketamine group (13.35 h) than in the intravenous ketamine (9.93 h) group (P < 0.01). During the 24-h observation time, fewer children asked for additional analgesic drugs in the caudal group (8 of 18, 44.4 %) than in the intravenous group (12 of 18, 66.6 %; P = 0.01). The times to first micturation and spontaneous leg movements and the incidence of nausea and vomiting were similar in the two groups. The OPS and sedation scores after operation showed no obvious differences between the groups at any time. CONCLUSION: Although caudal ketamine provides good postsurgical analgesia due to its potential neurotoxicity and only small clinical differences with intravenous ketamine, the administration of intravenous ketamine might be a reasonable option to potentially extend the postsurgical analgesic effect of the caudal administration of local anesthetics in children undergoing Salter osteotomy.

A Biomechanical Comparison between Salter Innominate Osteotomy and Pemberton Pericapsular Osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the pelvic biomechanics of patients who underwent Salter innominate osteotomy (SIO) for one hip and Pemberton pericapsular osteotomy (PPO) for the other hip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven of 126 patients who received a one-stage procedure involving SIO for one hip and PPO for the other hip were included in this series. Preoperative x-rays, archived reports and patient recall were obtained and retrospectively analyzed for these 57 patients. Pelvic biomechanics of the two osteotomy techniques were compared on x-rays and computerized tomography imaging. RESULTS: Based on x-rays, three hips with SIO and 1 hip with PPO had changes that could reflect unstable pelvic biomechanics. SIO caused an average lower limb discrepancy of 0.47 cm in all patients. Positive results were found in 5 patients at their most recent clinical examination. CONCLUSION: PPO affects the biomechanics of the pelvis much less than SIO. PPO demonstrated ideal biomechanical results compared with SIO, with fewer changes to the pelvic ring and the hip joints.