Measuring coping in multiple sclerosis: The Coping Index-MS.

BACKGROUND: Coping in multiple sclerosis (MS) refers to cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage stresses imposed by the illness. Existing generic and disease-specific coping scales do not meet modern guidelines for scale development and cannot produce interval-level metrics to allow for change scores. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to develop a brief patient-reported outcome measure for coping in MS, capable of interval-level measurement. METHODS: Qualitative work in 43 people with MS leads to a draft scale which was administered to 5747 participants, with longitudinal collection in 2290. A calibration sample of 1000 subjects split into development and validation sets was used to generate three scales consistent with Rasch model expectations. RESULTS: The total Coping Index-MS (CI-MS-T), CI-MS-Internal (CI-MS-I) and CI-MS-External (CI-MS-E) cover total, internal and externally focused coping. All three scales are capable of interval-level measurement. Trajectory analysis of 9000 questionnaires showed two trajectories in CI-MS-T: Group 1 showed a low level of coping with slight decline over 40 months, while Group 2 had a better and stable level of coping due to improving CI-MS-I which compensated for the deteriorating CI-MS-E over time. CI-MS-T < 30 identified group membership at baseline. CONCLUSION: The CI-MS-T, CI-MS-I and CI-MS-E, comprising 20 items, provide interval-level measurement and are free-for-use in not-for-profit settings.

The four self-efficacy trajectories among people with multiple sclerosis: Clinical associations and implications.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies among people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) have shown that self-efficacy is linked to physical, cognitive and psychological functioning. OBJECTIVES: To determine the distribution of self-efficacy in a large sample of pwMS, examining whether there are distinct groups which show different self-efficacy trajectories over time, and the health status characteristics of any groups identified. METHODS: Participants completed serial questionnaire packs, including Unidimensional Self-efficacy-MS (USE-MS) scale, for the Trajectories of Outcome in Neurological Conditions-MS (TONiC-MS) study over an average 46-month period. The resulting longitudinal data were analysed by a group-based trajectory model. RESULTS: 5887 pwMS were studied: mean age 50.2 years (SD 12.0); 73.6% female; Relapsing Remitting MS (61.8%), Secondary Progressive (22.9%), Primary Progressive (11.1%), Rapidly Evolving Relapsing Remitting MS (4.2%). Four distinct self-efficacy trajectories emerged, with declining, slightly declining, stable or improving self-efficacy, each showing different patterns of health status indicators such as EQ-5D-5L, disability and depression. USE-MS ≤ 18 at baseline detected all participants in the two declining groups. CONCLUSION: Future trials on interventions for self-efficacy should assume a priori that those with low levels of self-efficacy (USE-MS ≤ 18 at baseline) are likely to be on a declining trajectory and may need different interventions from those with stable self-efficacy.

Do pain, anxiety and depression influence quality of life for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease? A national study reconciling previous conflicting literature.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of elucidating the relationships between pain, mood and quality of life (QoL) amongst people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease is evident to clinicians, yet the literature is limited and inconsistent. We explored the relationships between pain, depression, anxiety and QoL to reconcile the previous contrasting findings and inform future research and clinical practice. METHODS: Patient-reported outcomes were obtained as part of the Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions study. Mood and QoL scales underwent Rasch analysis. Correlation coefficients examined the strength of association between variables of interest. A bivariate regression model was developed to examine the effects of pain, depression and anxiety on joint psychological and physical QoL domains. RESULTS: Of 636 people with ALS, 69% reported pain, of these most had mild pain. Seven percent (7%) of participants exceeded published cutoffs for probable depression and 14% had probable anxiety. Pain, depression and anxiety all influence quality of life; depression has a significant effect on both physical and psychological domains of QoL, whereas pain affects physical QoL and anxiety psychological QoL. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the importance of expressing quality of life in a conceptually appropriate way, as failing to take account of the multidimensional nature of QoL can result in important nuances being overlooked. Clinicians must be aware that pain, depression and anxiety all worsen QoL across their ranges, and not just when pain is severe or when anxiety or depression reach case level.