Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics, 2021.

Brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors are among the most fatal cancers and account for substantial morbidity and mortality in the United States. Population-based data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (a combined data set of the National Program of Cancer Registries [NPCR] and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] registries), NPCR, National Vital Statistics System and SEER program were analyzed to assess the contemporary burden of malignant and nonmalignant brain and other CNS tumors (hereafter brain) by histology, anatomic site, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Malignant brain tumor incidence rates declined by 0.8% annually from 2008 to 2017 for all ages combined but increased 0.5% to 0.7% per year among children and adolescents. Malignant brain tumor incidence is highest in males and non-Hispanic White individuals, whereas the rates for nonmalignant tumors are highest in females and non-Hispanic Black individuals. Five-year relative survival for all malignant brain tumors combined increased between 1975 to 1977 and 2009 to 2015 from 23% to 36%, with larger gains among younger age groups. Less improvement among older age groups largely reflects a higher burden of glioblastoma, for which there have been few major advances in prevention, early detection, and treatment the past 4 decades. Specifically, 5-year glioblastoma survival only increased from 4% to 7% during the same time period. In addition, important survival disparities by race/ethnicity remain for childhood tumors, with the largest Black-White disparities for diffuse astrocytomas (75% vs 86% for patients diagnosed during 2009-2015) and embryonal tumors (59% vs 67%). Increased resources for the collection and reporting of timely consistent data are critical for advancing research to elucidate the causes of sex, age, and racial/ethnic differences in brain tumor occurrence, especially for rarer subtypes and among understudied populations.

Clinical bioinformatics desiderata for molecular tumor boards.

Clinical Bioinformatics is a knowledge framework required to interpret data of medical interest via computational methods. This area became of dramatic importance in precision oncology, fueled by cancer genomic profiling: most definitions of Molecular Tumor Boards require the presence of bioinformaticians. However, all available literature remained rather vague on what are the specific needs in terms of digital tools and expertise to tackle and interpret genomics data to assign novel targeted or biomarker-driven targeted therapies to cancer patients. To fill this gap, in this article, we present a catalog of software families and human skills required for the tumor board bioinformatician, with specific examples of real-world applications associated with each element presented.

Comparison of incident breast cancer cases in the largest national US tumor registries.

BACKGROUND: This study compared incident breast cancer cases in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results Program (SEER) to a national population cancer registry. METHODS: Patients with malignant or in situ breast cancer (BC) 2010-2019 in the NCDB and SEER were compared to the US Cancer Statistics (USCS). Case coverage was estimated as the number of patients in the NCDB/SEER as a proportion of USCS cases. RESULTS: The USCS reported 3,047,509 patients; 77.5% patients were included in the NCDB and 46.0% in SEER. Case ascertainment varied significantly by patient sex (both registries, p < .001). For males, 84.1% were captured in the NCDB, whereas only 77.5% of females were included. Case coverage in SEER was better for females than males (46.1% vs. 43.5%). Registries varied significantly by race/ethnicity (both p < .001). Case coverage in the NCDB was highest for non-Hispanic White (78.2%), non-Hispanic Black (77.7%), and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (72.5%) BC patients, and lowest for Hispanic (56.4%) and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (41.1%) patients. In SEER, case coverage was highest for non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (78.1%) and Hispanic (69.6%) patients and it was significantly lower for all other subgroups (non-Hispanic Black, 44.8%; non-Hispanic White, 42.4%; and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, 36.6%). CONCLUSIONS: National US tumor registries provide data for a large sampling of breast cancer patients, yet significant differences in case coverage were observed based on age, sex, and race/ethnicity. These findings suggest that analyses using these data sets and interpretation of findings should account for these meaningful variances.

Clinical outcomes in patients with adamantinoma: Report from the bone and soft tissue tumor registry in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Adamantinomas are rare malignant bone tumors. Due to their low incidence, there are few reports on the clinical results of adamantinoma. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to clarify outcomes in patients with adamantinoma using data from the National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry. METHODS: From 2006 to 2019, 38 cases of tibial origin were included. Twenty-four were male and 14 were female, with a mean age of 37 (6-87) years and a mean follow-up of 35 (1-128) months. RESULTS: Surgery was performed in 33 cases (87%) (curettage: 4 cases, wide resection: 27 cases, amputation: 2 cases). Reconstruction was performed in 27 patients who underwent wide resection. A total of 12 additional surgeries were performed in 11 patients. The main reason for the additional surgeries was nonunion of grafting bone in 6 cases. Oncologic outcomes were DOC (death from other causes) in one case and NED (no evidence of disease) in 37 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment of adamantinomas in Japan have been extremely favorable. This may be due in part to the large number of cases with wide resection.

Infection of surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma with biological reconstruction: Data from the Japanese nationwide bone tumor registry.

BACKGROUND: Although biological reconstruction (such as recycled autograft, vascularized autograft, allograft, or bone transport) is possible for bone defects after malignant bone or soft tissue tumor resection, a high incidence of postoperative complications, including infection, poses a problem. The difficulty in accumulating cases has resulted in a lack of reliable etiological information, such as the incidence and risk factors of postoperative infections. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on the nationwide registry data. The primary endpoint was the need for additional surgical intervention for infection control. The overall incidence of postoperative infection and the related risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 707 malignant bone and soft tissue tumors with biological reconstruction, including recycled autograft, vascularized autograft, allograft, bone transport, and combinations of these. The incidence of postoperative infection was 10.8%. Patients reconstructed by pedicled autograft showed a higher incidence of infection, while cases involving the combination of recycled and pedicled autograft or allograft showed a lower incidence. Independent risk factors for infection included age over 17, tumor diameter over 10 cm, the tumor located on the trunk or being high grade, reconstruction by pedicled autograft, and delayed wound healing. CONCLUSION: Infection incidence was comparable to those in previous reports. Several conventional and novel risk factors were extracted by administering nationwide registry data. Data from the nationwide registry was informative for analyzing the incidence of postoperative infection in biological reconstruction with malignant bone and soft tissue tumor resection.

Complete prevalence of primary malignant and nonmalignant brain tumors in comparison to other cancers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Primary brain tumors (BTs) are rare, but cause morbidity and mortality disproportionately to their incidence. Prevalence estimates population-level cancer burdens at a specified time. This study estimates the prevalence of malignant and non-malignant BTs in comparison to other cancers. METHODS: Incidence data were obtained from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (2000-2019, varying), a combined data set including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries and National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Incidence of non-BT cancers were obtained from the United States Cancer Statistics (2001-2019). Incidence and survival estimates for all cancers were obtained from SEER (1975-2018). Complete prevalence as of December 31, 2019, was estimated using prevEst. Estimates were generated overall for non-BT cancers, by BT histopathology, age groups at prevalence (0-14, 15-39, 40-64, 65+ years), and sex. RESULTS: We estimated 1,323,121 individuals with a diagnosis of BTs at the date of prevalence. The majority of BT cases had non-malignant tumors (85.3%). Among all cancers, BTs were the most prevalent cancer type among those ages 15 to 39 years, second among those ages 0 to 14 years, and in the top five among those ages 40 to 64 years. The plurality of prevalent cases (43.5%) occurred among those ages 65+ years. Overall, females had a higher prevalence of BTs than males, with an overall female:male prevalence ratio of 1.68. CONCLUSIONS: BTs contribute significantly to the cancer burden in the United States, particularly among those younger than age 65 years. Understanding complete prevalence is crucial for monitoring cancer burden to inform clinical research and public policy.

Incidence and risk of infection in malignant soft tissue tumor resection: Data from the nationwide soft tissue tumor registry.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative infection is a devastating complication in limb salvage surgery for malignant soft tissue tumors. The low absolute case numbers of these rare cancers represent a bottleneck for data collection and analysis. The administration of nationwide registry data is a practical option for the accumulation of cases. METHODS: Data on malignant soft tissue tumor resection were extracted from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan. The incidence of postoperative infection and its risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 14,460 cases were included. The incidence of infection was 2.6%. Significant risks for infection were male sex, lower extremity or trunk location, tumor diameter of over 10 cm, trans-compartmental invasion, high grade, autologous bone graft, myocutaneous flap, vascular reconstruction, reconstruction by prosthesis, postoperative radiotherapy, and delayed wound healing. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence was lower than those in the previous studies, perhaps because of less frequent radiotherapy application. Some of the significant risk factors represented local invasiveness of the tumor, suggesting the importance of the preservation of soft tissue for infection prevention. The administration of nationwide registry data was informative for the analysis of infection in malignant soft tissue tumor resection.

Descriptive Epidemiology of Ependymal Tumors in Gironde, France: Results from the Gironde Registry for the 2000-2018 Period.

BACKGROUND: The Gironde Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumor Registry, in collaboration with the French National Cancer Institute, is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary CNS tumors in France and represents a population of 1.62 million. This report focuses on ependymal tumors to refine current knowledge and provide up-to-date data on the epidemiology of these rare tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All of the ependymal tumors were extracted from the Gironde CNS Tumor Registry for the years 2000-2018. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence rates, and time trends as well as survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four ependymal tumors were retrieved, which represented 2.3% of all the CNS tumors recorded in the same period. Histological subtype was significantly dependent on age and topography in the CNS. The median age at diagnosis was 46 years. The annual incidence rates varied between 0.15/100,000 (2004) and 0.96/100,000 (2016), with a significant increase over the study period by 4.67% per year. Five-year and 10-year OS rates were 87% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An increase in the incidence of ependymal tumors was observed over the past two decades. Further studies are needed to confirm this result and provide etiological clues.

Male sex and presence of preoperative symptoms are associated with early recurrence of WHO grade I meningiomas after surgical resection: analysis from the nationwide Brain Tumor Registry of Japan.

This study aimed to assess the risk factors for the recurrence of WHO grade I intracranial meningiomas using the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (BTRJ) database. We extracted the data of 4641 patients with intracranial WHO grade I meningiomas treated only by surgical resection between 2001 and 2008. We conducted complete data analysis (n = 3690) and multiple imputation analysis (n = 4641) to adjust for missing data on tumor size. The influence of factors including age, sex, size, extent of resection, location, and preoperative symptoms on PFS was assessed. Univariate analyses of the complete data set showed that age did not affect PFS; however, male sex (p < 0.001), tumor size ≥ 30 mm (p < 0.001), low extent of resection, tumor location at the skull base (p < 0.001), and the presence of preoperative symptoms (p < 0.001) were risk factors for a significantly shorter PFS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex (p < 0.001) and presence of preoperative symptoms (p = 0.027) were independent risk factors for shorter PFS alongside large tumor size (p < 0.001) and non-gross total resection (p < 0.001). These results were confirmed for the imputed dataset. While most previous large nationwide studies of meningiomas have evaluated overall survival, progression-free survival has yet to be thoroughly examined. This study suggests that even histologically benign meningiomas may have a sex difference in postoperative behavior. This observation may provide clues to understanding the mechanism of meningioma cell proliferation.

Effect of adjuvant radiotherapy after subtotal resection for WHO grade I meningioma: a propensity score matching analysis of the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to improve the understanding of the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (AR) after subtotal resection (STR) of World Health Organization (WHO) grade I meningiomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan database. Among 7341 patients diagnosed with intracranial meningioma during 2001-2008, we identified 406 patients with WHO grade I meningioma treated with STR as initial treatment. Data on progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for their relevance to clinical factors including age, sex, tumor location and size, presence of preoperative symptoms, and AR. RESULTS: AR was administered for 73 patients (18.0%). Regrowth occurred in 90 cases (22.2%) during the median follow-up period of 6.0 years (interquartile range, 2.7-7.7 years). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort showed that no AR was associated with significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-5.42, p = 0.004). The therapeutic effect of AR was confirmed for skull base, but not non-skull base, meningiomas (p = 0.003 and 0.69, respectively). Propensity score matching analysis balanced the influence of confounding factors to generate AR+ and AR- cohorts of 73 patients each. PFS was significantly longer in the AR+ cohort than in the AR- cohort (HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.53-8.59, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the favorable effect of AR only for skull base meningiomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that AR improves tumor control after STR in WHO grade I meningiomas. However, this beneficial effect might be limited to skull base meningiomas.

Cancer incidence and associations with known risk and protective factors: the Alaska EARTH study.

PURPOSE: Cancer is the leading cause of mortality among Alaska Native (AN) people. The Alaska Education and Research Towards Health (EARTH) cohort was established to examine risk and protective factors for chronic diseases, including cancer, among AN people. Here, we describe the cancer experience of the Alaska EARTH cohort in relation to statewide- and region-specific tumor registry data, and assess associations with key cancer risk factors. METHODS: AN participants were recruited into the Alaska EARTH cohort during 2004-2006. Data collected included patient demographic, anthropometric, medical and family history, and lifestyle information. This study linked the Alaska EARTH data with cancer diagnoses recorded by the Alaska Native Tumor Registry (ANTR) through 12/31/15. We compared EARTH incidence to ANTR statewide incidence. We examined independent associations of smoking status, diet, BMI, and physical activity with incident all-site cancers using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Between study enrollment and 2015, 171 of 3,712 (4.7%) Alaska EARTH study participants were diagnosed with cancer. The leading cancers among Alaska EARTH participants were female breast, lung, and colorectal cancer, which reflected those observed among AN people statewide. Incidence (95% CI) of cancer (all sites) among Alaska EARTH participants was 629.7 (510.9-748.6) per 100,000 person-years; this was comparable to statewide rates [680.5 (660.0-701.5) per 100,000 population]. We observed lower risk of all-sites cancer incidence among never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer incidence in the Alaska EARTH cohort was similar to incidence observed statewide. Risk and protective factors for leading cancers among AN people mirror those observed among other populations.

Trends in central nervous system tumor incidence relative to other common cancers in adults, adolescents, and children in the United States, 2000 to 2010.

BACKGROUND: Time trends in cancer incidence rates (IR) are important to measure the changing burden of cancer on a population over time. The overall IR of cancer in the United States is declining. Although central nervous system tumors (CNST) are rare, they contribute disproportionately to mortality and morbidity. In this analysis, the authors examined trends in the incidence of the most common cancers and CNST between 2000 and 2010. METHODS: The current analysis used data from the United States Cancer Statistics publication and the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States. Age-adjusted IR per 100,000 population with 95% confidence intervals and the annual percent change (APC) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for selected common cancers and CNST overall and by age, sex, race/ethnicity, selected histologies, and malignancy status. RESULTS: In adults, there were significant decreases in colon (2000-2010: APC, -3.1), breast (2000-2010: APC, -0.8), lung (2000-2010: APC, -1.1), and prostate (2000-2010: APC, -2.4) cancer as well as malignant CNST (2008-2010: APC, -3.1), but a significant increase was noted in nonmalignant CNST (2004-2010: APC, 2.7). In adolescents, there were significant increases in malignant CNST (2000-2008: APC, 1.0) and nonmalignant CNST (2004-2010: APC, 3.9). In children, there were significant increases in acute lymphocytic leukemia (2000-2010: APC, 1.0), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (2000-2010: APC, 0.6), and malignant CNST (2000-2010: APC, 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance of IR trends is an important way to measure the changing public health and economic burden of cancer. In the current study, there were significant decreases noted in the incidence of adult cancer, whereas adolescent and childhood cancer IR were either stable or increasing.

Association of county-level socioeconomic status with meningioma incidence and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature suggests that individual socioeconomic status (SES) may influence incidence, treatments, and survival of brain tumor cases. We aim to conduct the first national study to evaluate the association between US county-level SES and incidence, treatment, and survival in meningioma. METHODS: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States analytic dataset, which combines data from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, was used to identify meningioma cases from 2006 to 2019. SES quintiles were created using American Community Survey data. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between SES and meningioma. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to assess the effect of SES on survival using the NPCR analytic dataset. RESULTS: A total of 409 681 meningioma cases were identified. Meningioma incidence increased with higher county-level SES with Q5 (highest quintile) having a 12% higher incidence than Q1 (incidence rate ratios (IRR) = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.10-1.14; P < .0001). The Hispanic group was the only racial-ethnic group that had lower SES associated with increased meningioma incidence (Q5: age-adjusted incidence ratio (AAIR) = 9.02, 95%CI: 8.87-9.17 vs. Q1: AAIR = 9.33, 95%CI: 9.08-9.59; IRR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.94-1.00; P = .0409). Increased likelihood of surgical treatment was associated with Asian or Pacific Islander non-Hispanic individuals (compared to White non-Hispanic (WNH)) (OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.23-1.33, P < .001) and males (OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.29-1.33, P < .001). Black non-Hispanic individuals (OR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.88-0.92, P < .001) and those residing in metropolitan areas (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.96-0.96, P < .001) were less likely to receive surgical treatment compared to WNH individuals. Overall median survival was 137 months, and survival was higher in higher SES counties (Q5 median survival = 142 months). CONCLUSIONS: Higher county-level SES was associated with increased meningioma incidence, surgical treatment, and overall survival. Racial-ethnic stratification identified potential disparities within the meningioma population. Further work is needed to understand the underpinnings of socioeconomic and racial disparities for meningioma patients.

Childhood, adolescent, and adult primary brain and central nervous system tumor statistics for practicing healthcare providers in neuro-oncology, CBTRUS 2015-2019.

Background: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), is the largest aggregation of histopathology-specific population-based data for primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) in the US. CBTRUS publishes an annual statistical report which provides critical reference data for the broad neuro-oncology community. Here, we summarize the key findings from the 2022 CBTRUS annual statistical report for healthcare providers. Methods: Incidence data were obtained from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for 52 central cancer registries (CCRs). Survival data were obtained from 42 NPCR CCRs. All rates are per 100 000 and age-adjusted using the 2000 US standard population. Overall median survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier models. Survival data for selected molecularly defined histopathologies are from the National Cancer Database. Mortality data are from the National Vital Statistics System. Results: The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate of all primary brain and other CNS tumors was 24.25/100 000. Incidence was higher in females and non-Hispanics. The most commonly occurring malignant and predominately non-malignant tumors was glioblastoma (14% of all primary brain tumors) and meningioma (39% of all primary brain tumors), respectively. Mortality rates and overall median survival varied by age, sex, and histopathology. Conclusions: This summary describes the most up-to-date population-based incidence, mortality, and survival, of primary brain and other CNS tumors in the US and aims to serve as a concise resource for neuro-oncology providers.

Louise Eisenhardt (1891-1967): World Renowned Neuropathologist, Brain Tumor Registry Director, First Editor-In-Chief of Journal of Neurosurgery, and President of Harvey Cushing Society.

BACKGROUND: This historical account reviews the course and lasting impact of Dr. Louise Eisenhardt (1891-1967) in neurosurgery. METHOD: The writing of this project was sparked by the discovery of original scientific and bibliographical information about Eisenhardt, testimony on personal relationships, and viewpoints after comprehensive compilation of information. It is a thorough review of literature on Eisenhardt and reflects the scope and depth of these prior works. RESULTS: It begins with the decisive influence of Harvey Cushing's mentorship and academic; follows Eisenhardt's impact on the development of modern neuropathology; discusses the Eisenhardt-Percival-Bailey-Cushing collaboration on gross brain specimens and histological classification of brain tumors; recounts Cushing's creation of a neuropathologist team for the Brain Tumor Registry working asynchronously with the Pathology Department at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital; Eisenhardt's aid in the development of intraoperative analysis of brain tumors; her career as a neuropathologist; her contributions as Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurosurgery; and her preservation of the Brain Tumor Registry at Yale University School of Medicine estimated the largest and most valuable databank of information in the history of medicine. Eisenhardt served as President, Historian, and Secretary-Treasurer of the Harvey Cushing Society, the professional organization now known as the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, and was senior lecturer for members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, constituents of NEUROSURGERY Publications. CONCLUSIONS: Our article provides glimpses into the personality of Dr. Louise Eisenhardt and her marked impact on neurosurgery and allied neurosciences.

Associations between urbanicity and spinal cord astrocytoma management and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The management of spinal cord astrocytomas (SCAs) remains controversial and may include any combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Factors such as urbanicity (metropolitan versus non-metropolitan residence) are shown to be associated with patterns of treatment and clinical outcomes in a variety of cancers, but the role urbanicity plays in SCA treatment remains unknown. METHODS: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) analytic dataset, which combines data from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Programs, was used to identify individuals with SCAs between 2004 and 2019. Individuals' county of residence was classified as metropolitan or non-metropolitan. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between urbanicity and SCA. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to assess the effect of urbanicity on survival using the NPCR survival dataset (2004-2018). RESULTS: 1697 metropolitan and 268 non-metropolitan SCA cases were identified. The cohorts did not differ in age or gender composition. The populations had different racial/ethnic compositions, with a higher White non-Hispanic population in the non-metropolitan cohort (86 % vs 66 %, p < 0.001) and a greater Black non-Hispanic population in the metropolitan cohort (14 % vs 9.9 %, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in likelihood of receiving comprehensive treatment (OR=0.99, 95 % CI [0.56, 1.65], p = >0.9), or survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92, p = 0.4) when non-metropolitan and metropolitan cases were compared. In the metropolitan cohort, there were statistically significant differences in SCA treatment patterns when stratified by race/ethnicity (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Urbanicity does not significantly impact SCA management or survival. Race/ethnicity may be associated with likelihood of receiving certain SCA treatments in metropolitan communities.

The Merkel Cell Carcinoma Patient Registry: From Promise to Prototype to Patient.

The Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) Patient Registry is a national multi-institutional collaborative effort that will prospectively follow and record outcomes and events in MCC patients. MCC is the prototypical rare tumor, and this Registry will trail blaze new methodologies that will enable multiple investigators to examine real world outcome data in real time. Deliverables from the Registry include precise patient stratification into risk categories, identification of best practices, real-world data for drug development programs, revelations about optimal sequence and combinations therapies, uncovering low incidence toxicities, and the generation of novel testable hypotheses. Importantly, the Registry offers a way forward in the yet-unsolved dilemma of drug development for rare tumors, since the Registry's design will allow the creation of highly defined patient-level data that can be used as a robust comparator for single arm phase I and II clinical trials. The MCC Task Force comprises members from academic medical centers, the drug industry, the National Institutes of Health, and the US Food and Drug Administration. Project Data Sphere, LLC provides a secure, open-access data sharing platform and comprehensive support to optimize research performance and ensure rigorous and timely results. The Registry is currently in development and is based on a REDCap database integrated into the host institution's electronic medical record. We plan to have the first patient accessioned on Project Data Sphere's data platform in the second quarter of 2022. Members of the MCC Registry Task Force represent a joint effort of research and clinical investigators from academia, industry and regulatory science to develop the first publicly held MCC registry on Project Data Sphere's open-access data platform. Our hope is that this shared repository will allow investigators to identify new approaches, improve treatment outcomes, shorten the time from discovery to implementation and, ultimately, improve patient lives.

Dr. Louise Eisenhardt's personal notes: how she and Dr. Cushing collected data and followed patients.

Dr. Louise Eisenhardt was one of the first neuropathologists and was responsible for the development of tumor diagnosis guidelines. This historical vignette reviews her previously unseen handwritten notes in which she describes methods used by her and Dr. Harvey Cushing to obtain patient follow-up data for their Brain Tumor Registry. Her description spans 50 years, using "every possible clue to be jumped upon in [their] clinical records and correspondence." Their follow-up was divided into two periods: early follow-up (1912-1932) and registry (1933-1961). During early follow-up, patients were asked to write to them on the anniversary of their operation. The foundation of the registry necessitated the use of "considerable effort on [their] part to gather up old threads" including renewed contact with patients after 15-20 years. Methods of follow-up included continued verbal and written correspondence with patients and "strong-arm methods," including use of the Fuller Brush man and the exhumation of a body. Drs. Eisenhardt and Cushing believed "every case was important in adding to our collective knowledge of various types of tumors particularly in relationship to life expectancies and suggesting improvement in surgical treatments." Dr. Eisenhardt's meticulous record keeping allows for insights into the first known outcomes-related tumor registry in neurosurgery.

Generalizable EHR-R-REDCap pipeline for a national multi-institutional rare tumor patient registry.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical informatics pipeline designed to capture large-scale structured Electronic Health Record (EHR) data for a national patient registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EHR-R-REDCap pipeline is implemented using R statistical software to remap and import structured EHR data into the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)-based multi-institutional Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) Patient Registry using an adaptable data dictionary. RESULTS: Clinical laboratory data were extracted from EPIC Clarity across several participating institutions. Laboratory values (Labs) were transformed, remapped, and imported into the MCC registry using the EHR labs abstraction (eLAB) pipeline. Forty-nine clinical tests encompassing 482 450 results were imported into the registry for 1109 enrolled MCC patients. Data-quality assessment revealed highly accurate, valid labs. Univariate modeling was performed for labs at baseline on overall survival (N = 176) using this clinical informatics pipeline. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate feasibility of the facile eLAB workflow. EHR data are successfully transformed and bulk-loaded/imported into a REDCap-based national registry to execute real-world data analysis and interoperability.

The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States Histopathological Grouping Scheme Provides Clinically Relevant Brain and Other Central Nervous System Categories for Cancer Registry Data.

Background: Brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors are a heterogenous collection of tumors, but they are generally reported in local and national cancer statistics as a single, large category. Although the collection of non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors has been mandated since diagnosis year 2004, these tumors are often excluded from standard statistical reports on cancer despite their burden on populations in the United States and Canada. The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) historical and current histopathological grouping schemes have been developed in collaboration with neuropathologists to capture the diversity of these tumors in clinically relevant categories. The goal of this analysis was to test a new recode variable based on the CBTRUS histopathology grouping prior to releasing the variable for use in the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) Cancer in North American (CiNA) data sets and by individual cancer registries. Methods: The CBTRUS histopathology grouping scheme variable was created and implemented in an evaluation CiNA data set. The accuracy of the variable's categories was evaluated. Counts and incidence rates were calculated using SEER*Stat. Results: Overall, 481,650 cases of brain and other CNS tumors meeting the CBTRUS definition were identified for diagnosis years 2015-2019 in the CiNA data set for the US and Canada, making these the sixth-most-common tumor as a group. Of the brain and other CNS tumor cases, approximately 29% were malignant (behavior code /3 in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition [ICD-O-3]) while about 71% were nonmalignant (ICD-O-3 behavior code /0 or /1). The overall age-adjusted annual incidence rate (AAAIR) of brain and other CNS tumors was 24.44 per 100,000 (95% CI, 24.37-24.51). The most common histopathologies were meningioma, of which approximately 99% were nonmalignant (AAAIR, 9.09 per 100,000; 95% CI, 9.05-9.13); tumors of the pituitary, of which about 99% were nonmalignant (AAAIR, 4.28 per 100,000; 95% CI, 4.25-4.31); and glioblastoma, of which 100% were malignant behavior (AAAIR, 3.20 per 100,000; 95% CI, 3.18-3.22). Conclusion: Brain and other CNS tumors make up an extremely diverse category that contributes substantially to the cancer burden in North America. The CBTRUS histopathology grouping variable provides clinically relevant groupings for analysis of these tumors in the NAACCR CiNA as well as by individual central cancer registry groups. We encourage the use of this variable to support more detailed analysis of this important group of tumors.