Clinical outcomes and survivorship of two-stage total hip or knee arthroplasty in septic arthritis: a retrospective analysis with a minimum five-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Septic arthritis of the native joint is challenging for orthopedic surgeons because it may lead to wide bone defects and severe impairment of joint function. This study aimed to analyze clinical functional outcomes, the rate of infection eradication, and survival of implants of patients who underwent two-stage arthroplasty for septic arthritis of the hip and knee. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre analysis was conducted of patients treated for septic arthritis of the hip and knee joints through a two-stage surgery between 2012 and 2015. Clinical and radiological records were gathered from the prospectively collected Institutional Arthroplasty Registry. Patients' pre-operative Harris hip scores and Knee Society scores were compared with those obtained at the latest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess survival of implants. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included. The mean follow-up was 85.2 ± 15.4 months. The Harris hip score improved from 39.4 ± 9.9 to 84.5 ± 10.8 points (p < 0.001). The Knee Society score improved from 40.7 ± 8.4 to 86.0 ± 7.8 points (p < 0.001). Knee Society score-function increased from 25.7 ± 14.2 to 85.4 ± 23.4 points (p < 0.001). The infection eradication rates were 92.0% and 90.9% in patients who underwent hip and knee operation, respectively (p = 0.891). Overall survivorship of implants after the second stage was 93.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage arthroplasty provides good to excellent clinical outcomes in cases of active septic arthritis of the hip and the knee, high rates of infection control, and implant survival.

Partial two-stage exchange at the site of periprosthetic hip joint infections.

INTRODUCTION: In the past 10 years an increasing number of studies about partial two-stage exchange arthroplasty in the management of periprosthetic hip infections have been published. The aim of the present work was to systematically review the current knowledge about this procedure, and critically verify the success as well as the complications of this treatment option. MATERIALS-METHODS: A literature search was performed through PubMed until June 2018. Search terms were "partial two stage hip" and "partial retention hip", and "retaining well fixed hip". RESULTS: A total of 7 studies reporting on a total of 80 patients could be identified. All studies had a level of evidence IV. The great majority of the studies reported on the isolated removal of the acetabular cup and placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer head onto the retained, well-fixed stem. Most of the periprosthetic infections were caused by staphylococci. The infection eradication rate varied between 81.3 and 100% at a mean follow-up between 19 and 70 months. Poor outcome was observed at the site of MRSA infections. CONCLUSIONS: The partial two-stage exchange arthroplasty appears to be a possible option in the management of PJI when one prosthetic component is well-fixed so that their removal might result in significant bone loss and compromise of fixation at the time of the later prosthesis reimplantation, and the causative organisms are not multiresistant. The small numbers published about this protocol does not allow for a generalization of application and should be only applied in highly selected patients. Future studies with larger collectives and longer follow-ups are welcome to evaluate the clinical success of this option and its possible role in the management of PJI.

The diagnosis and treatment of septic hip with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

This article aims to provide clinical doctors with references for the diagnosis and treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) accompanied with septic hip by summarizing and analyzing clinical data and postoperative follow-up information of patients treated with two-stage arthroplasty. We retrospectively analyzed ten patients who underwent two-stage arthroplasty in our hospital due to ONFH accompanied with septic hip. The diagnosis of septic hip includes erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) > 30 mm/h, C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L, pus-like synovial fluid, positive microbiological culture, and the findings of septic arthritis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Patient's information was evaluated based on the review of medical records, including gender, age, symptoms, risk factor of ONFH and septic arthritis, blood test, radiograph, MRI scan, microbiological culture, treatment, follow-up period and outcome. A total of ten patients were diagnosed with ONFH accompanied with septic hip. The average follow-up period was 43.5 months. None of the patients experienced failure during the follow-up period. The risk factor of ONFH was alcohol-related (60%), steroid-related (20%) and idiopathic (20%). Nine patients (90%) have no risk factor of septic arthritis and one patient (10%) has nephrotic syndrome. All patients did not experience any fever symptoms before surgery, but all showed worsening symptoms of pain. There were three patients (30%) with abnormal WBC count > 10 × 109/L. All patients had elevated ESR and/or CPR. Nine patients (90%) had positive MRI findings, and seven patients (70%) had positive microbiological culture. When patients with ONFH experience worsening hip joint pain accompanied by unexplained elevated CRP and/or ESR, it should be suspected whether ONFH is accompanied with septic hip. In these cases, MRI scans should be performed to exclude septic hip. Patients with ONFH accompanied with septic hip showed satisfactory results after two-stage arthroplasty.

Comparison of efficacy and complications between two types of staging arthroplasty in treating chronic septic hip arthritis: A retrospective clinical study.

Septic hip arthritis is a rare but serious disease, which is often persistent, able to transform into a chronic infection, and difficult to cure. The present study aimed to compare the midterm outcomes between the staging of a total hip arthroplasty via the Girdlestone surgery (a resection of the head and neck) and the Girdlestone combined with a cement spacer in treating chronic septic hip arthritis, as well as to compare the postsurgery efficacy and complications between the two groups. A total of 13 patients (14 total hip joints) were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. For the stage I surgery, four patients (five hips) underwent the resection of the head and neck, and nine patients (nine hips) underwent the resection of the head and neck combined with the implantation of a bone cement spacer. After the infection was fully controlled, the patients in both groups underwent cementless total hip arthroplasties as stage II surgeries. The mean follow-up period was 24.2 months. The curative effects and complications of the patients were recorded and compared. It was found that the application of the staging arthroplasty for treating a chronic septic hip was conducive to the complete clearance of lesions. Notably, the implantation of a bone cement spacer containing antibiotics in the stage I surgery prevented joint contracture caused by a head and neck resection, reducing the risk of infection recurrence between the two stages of the operation. This effectively maintained the length of the lower limbs, simplified the stage II complete hip arthroplasty and reduced operative hemorrhage, thus achieving improved recovery of joint function after the stage II arthroplasty. The results suggested that the implantation of a cement spacer at the stage I surgery was more effective in treating chronic septic hip arthritis.

Three Concurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Periprosthetic joint infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality following total joint arthroplasty. Two-stage arthroplasty, with the use of an antibiotic cement spacer, is an effective means of managing periperiprosthetic joint infections. There is a lack of data relating to the management, prognosis, and clinical outcomes associated with multiple peri-prosthetic joint infections. Here, we present a case report of a patient successfully treated for three synchronic peri-prosthetic joint infections of both knees and a single hip.