Experience of a modified chest tube suture-fixation technique in uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the feasibility and advantages of a modified chest tube suture-fixation technique in uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 116 patients who underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) for lung diseases in Zhengzhou People's Hospital between October 2019 and October 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the applied suture-fixation methods, i.e., 72 patients in the active group and 44 patients in the control group. The two groups were subsequently compared in the terms of gender, age, operation method, indwelling time of chest tube, postoperative pain score, chest tube removal time, wound healing grade, length of hospital stay, incision healing grade, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, operation method, indwelling time of chest tube, postoperative pain score, and length of hospital stay (P = 0.167, 0.185, 0.085, 0.051, 0.927, and 0.362, respectively). However, the chest tube removal time, incision healing grade, and incision scar satisfaction in the active group were significantly better compared with those of the control group (P = < 0.001, 0.033, and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In summary, the new suture-fixation approach can minimize the number of stitches, and time necessary for chest tube removal process, and avoid the pain experienced when removing the drainage tube. This method is more feasible, has better incision conditions, and provides a convenient tube removal, making it more suitable to patients.

Application of bilateral simultaneous sequential single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery in multiple nodules both lungs: a single-center experience of 10 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the application of bilateral simultaneous sequential single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery in multiple nodules in both lungs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 10 patients in Zhengzhou People's Hospital who underwent single-incision thoracoscopic surgery to treat multiple nodules in both lungs at the same time from September 2019 to January 2021, and analyze the perioperative indicators (general condition, smoking history, family history, follow-up time of pulmonary nodules, size, location, height and weight, pulmonary function, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, color and volume of drainage fluid, catheterization time, perioperative complications, length of stay, pathology, patient satisfaction, etc.). RESULTS: All 10 patients used single-incision thoracoscopy to complete bilateral simultaneous sequential operations, aged 32 to 70 years, 8 female patients, 2 male patients, preoperative follow-up time ranging from 1 day to 2 years, a total of 23 lung nodules were removed except for the benign lesions in one nodule in the 2 patients, the other nodules were tumorous lesions (91.3%). The average total hospital stay was 10.5 days (8-14 days), and the average operation time was 194.5 min (145-292 min). The blood loss ranged from 10 to 280 ml, all patients had no serious complications during the perioperative period, and they recovered well and were discharged smoothly, and the satisfaction reached 100%. CONCLUSION: Single-incision bilateral simultaneous sequential thoracoscopy have certain advantages in the treatment of patients with multiple nodules in both lungs, conforms to the concept of rapid recovery, and is a feasible choice in the shared decision making of doctors and patients.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Thoracic Surgery Requiring One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Intraoperative fluid management based on pulse pressure variation has shown potential to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve clinical outcomes in various surgical settings. However, its efficacy and safety have not been assessed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. Methods: Patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery approach were randomly assigned to two groups. In the PPV group, fluid administration was guided by the pulse pressure variation parameter, while in the near-zero group, it was guided by conventional hemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome was the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio 15 min after extubation. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first three postoperative days, and the length of hospital stay. Results: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio did not differ between the two groups (364.48 ± 38.06 vs. 359.21 ± 36.95; p = 0.51), although patients in the PPV group (n = 44) received a larger amount of both crystalloids (1145 ± 470.21 vs. 890 ± 459.31, p = 0.01) and colloids (162.5 ± 278.31 vs 18.18 ± 94.68, p = 0.002) compared to the near-zero group (n = 44). No differences were found in extubation time, type and number of PPCs, and length of hospital stay. Conclusions: PPV-guided fluid management in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation does not improve pulmonary gas exchange as measured by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and does not seem to offer clinical benefits. Additionally, it results in increased fluid administration compared to fluid management based on conventional hemodynamic parameters.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Overview, Indications, and Techniques.

Twenty years have passed since uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was first reported. Several reports have already proven the minimal invasiveness of uniportal VATS. In addition, two large clinical trials recently demonstrated the benefits of segmentectomy for small peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Uniportal VATS segmentectomy is considered the most beneficial minimally invasive surgery for patients with early-stage lung cancer. However, a high level of skill and experience are required to achieve this goal. Only a few reports have discussed specific techniques, particularly for complex segmentectomies. In this Special Issue, we reviewed previous reports on uniportal VATS segmentectomy regarding the indications, instrument selection, marking of the tumor location, methods of intersegmental plane identification, and lymph node dissection, including our own techniques with video content.

Evaluating postoperative recovery in uniportal versus needlescopic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a comparable study.

Objectives: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is a common disease in young and thin male. Operation has been regarded as definitive treatment for it. However, the operative methods for those patients are under dispute. This study aims to directly compare the outcomes of uniportal VATS vs. needlescopic VATS in the treatment of PSP, focusing on postoperative pain and safety outcomes. Methods: From July 2013 to December 2017, the patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery for pneumothorax in National Taiwan University Hospital were retrospectively collected. The preoperative condition, surgical results, and postoperative outcomes was analyzed. Results: There were 60 patients undergoing needlescopic VATS and 91 undergoing uniportal VATS during the study period. There was no significant difference between the patients who underwent needlescopic VATS and those who underwent uniportal VATS in their demographic and clinical characteristics. The post-operative pain score was significantly lower in the uniportal VATS group compared to the needlescopic VATS group at day 1 (2.65 ± 1.59 vs. 1.74 ± 1.35, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Uniportal VATS offers an effective, safe alternative for PSP treatment, with benefits including reduced post-operative pain. Our findings support the use of uniportal VATS, supplemented by a wound protector, as a viable option for PSP patients.

Uniportal Robotic Lung Resection Techniques.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgical (U-VATS) and telerobotic techniques have become widely adopted strategies for lung resection and represent a natural progression born of advancing technologic innovation and decades of expanding clinical experience. Combining the best that each approach offers may be the next logical step in the evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Two parallel efforts are underway: one that combines the traditional U-VATS incision with a multi-arm telerobotic platform and one that utilizes a new single-arm device. Feasibility and refinement of surgical technique will need to be achieved before any conclusions about efficacy can be drawn.

Experiences of novel cotton device for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: CS Two-Way HandleTM.

In Japan, cotton is commonly used in thoracic surgery for the gentle handling of organs as well as obtaining a good surgical field. While uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is being recognized as a major surgical approach, use of cotton is not noted in this technique. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery needs curved instruments because they are effective in preventing the interference of instruments. Thus, we developed a novel curved cotton instrument, known as the "CS Two-Way HandleTM", for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The CS Two-Way HandleTM can be used not only as a cotton bar but also as a suction aid. Moreover, surgical smoke can be suctioned with the insertion of cotton. This instrument was introduced in our institution in September 2019, along with some other prototypes. When anatomical lung resection using uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was first introduced, there were some instances of conversion to conventional multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, after the CS Two-Way HandleTM introduction, the procedure has become easy to perform and the need for conversion to conventional methods has reduced. The main uses of the CS Two-Way HandleTM are: (I) exposure of the surgical view, (II) lymph node dissection, (III) bleeding control, (IV) suction, and (V) evacuation of surgical smoke. We present our experiences using the CS Two-Way HandleTM in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy provides good perioperative results and early postoperative recovery.

Background: Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy has become widespread, the advantage of uniportal VATS (U-VATS) segmentectomy over multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to verify the safety and usefulness of U-VATS segmentectomy compared with conventional hybrid/multiportal segmentectomy. Methods: Here, we retrospectively reviewed the data from anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy cases in a single institution from March 2010 to March 2021. Patients were divided into the U-VATS and hybrid/multiportal VATS (H/M-VATS) groups. Perioperative results were compared between the groups after matching for patient background characteristics. In addition, cases of complex segmentectomy were selected from each group and compared in terms of perioperative results. Results: A total of 180 patients underwent pulmonary segmentectomy during the study period at this institution, comprising 57 cases in the U-VATS group and 123 cases in the H/M-VATS group. After matching for age, sex, disease, tumor location, and type of segmentectomy, no significant differences between the groups were seen in blood loss, major intraoperative bleeding, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, or re-hospitalization within 30 days after discharge. Operation time (141±46 vs. 174±45 min, P<0.001), postoperative drainage duration (1.5±1.2 vs. 2.3±1.8 days, P=0.007), and postoperative hospital stay (3.4±2.0 vs. 4.6±2.5 days, P=0.006) were significantly lower in the U-VATS group. Subgroup analysis of the complex segmentectomy cases also revealed that operation time (146±34 vs. 185±47 min, P<0.001), postoperative drainage duration (1.5±1.3 vs. 2.2±1.2 days, P=0.021), and postoperative hospital stay (3.0±1.4 vs. 4.9±2.1 days, P<0.001) were significantly reduced in the U-VATS group. Conclusions: U-VATS segmentectomy appears as safe and feasible as H/M-VATS segmentectomy. An experienced surgeon can make a smooth transition to U-VATS.

Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is a delicate surgical procedure. Hitherto, only few studies have assessed the learning curves of anatomical segmentectomy by U-VATS, with varying data available. The present study aimed to investigate the learning curve and clinical advantages for U-VATS segmentectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent U-VATS or non-U-VATS segmentectomy between August 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was employed to illustrate the learning curve of U-VATS segmentectomy. Perioperative parameters were used to determine the structural intervals of the learning curve, and to compare U-VATS and non-U-VATS segmentectomy. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients receiving U-VATS segmentectomy and 98 patients receiving non-VATS segmentectomy were included. Of these, 116 patients underwent successful U-VATS segmentectomy, while the other six patients underwent conversions. The structural intervals of 20-29 cases and 58-63 cases were determined as the threshold according to the CUSUM analyses. The learning process of U-VATS segmentectomy was therefore divided into three phases. Interestingly, the perioperative parameters differed significantly between Phases 1 and 3, including operative time (Op-T), postoperative hospital stays (Po-Hst), postoperative thoracic drainage (Po-D), and operative failure (Po-F) rates (P<0.05). Moreover, U-VATS segmentectomy in Phase 3 was associated with significantly shorter Po-Hst and Op-T, less Po-D, and reduced postoperative pain compared with non-U-VATS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS segmentectomy is an ideal alternative to non-U-VATS segmentectomy. Surgeons can preliminarily complete U-VATS anatomical segmentectomy after performing 20-29 cases, and can master the surgical techniques after completing 58-63 cases.

Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery does not compromise the outcome of segmentectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy (UTS) with that of multiportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy (MTS). METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2015, a total of 1056 patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy were identified, including 375 and 681 who had simple and complex segmentectomies, respectively. A propensity matched analysis was applied to compare perioperative indicators. Survival outcomes, which included disease-free survival and overall survival, were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Propensity matching generated 454 paired patients for the UTS and MTS cohorts; the perioperative results were comparable. Survival analysis indicated that the surgical approach (UTS versus MTS) was not an independent risk factor in either disease-free survival (P = 0.247) or overall survival (P = 0.870) of patients with invasive adenocarcinoma. A shorter operative time was observed in patients who had a UTS (P < 0.001) or an MTS (P = 0.011) via a simple segmentectomy compared with those who had a complex segmentectomy. Moreover, 147 and 266 corresponding cases were selected to compare the UTS and MTS in the simple and complex segmentectomy groups, respectively. MTS showed slightly longer operative times (119 vs 108 min; P = 0.007) and drainage duration (P = 0.010) in the simple segmentectomy group. In contrast, UTS was associated with statistically longer operative times (141 vs 133 min; P = 0.016) in the complex segmentectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Although minor differences could be found in the simple and complex segmentectomy groups, respectively, these results were clinically irrelevant. Our study supports UTS as a feasible and safe surgical technique.

Ectopic mediastinal thyroid removed by U-VATS approach. A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Ectopic thyroid tissue is a rare entity, and accounts for approximately 1% of all mediastinal tumours. It is a differential diagnosis of the mediastinum tumors or metastatic deposits from an orthotopic gland, as well as other benign or malignant masses. Although most cases are asymptomatic and discovered incidently by imaging, symptoms related to tumor size and its compression of adjacent structures may also appear which necessites explorations and lead to diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a 59-year-old women, followed for glaucoma and operated for bilateral congenital cataract reffered to our structure by the service of pnemology for a right laterotracheal mediastinal mass. The patient presented respiratory symptoms over four months, and the physical examination found patient in good condition with PS 0 and normal vital signs, a poor oral health was noticed. The CT scann showed a left basal opacity and a right laterotracheal mediastinal mass at the upper right mediastinum, pushing forward the superior vena cava and compressing the trachea on the contralateral side, with well-defined borders and without signs of infiltration of adjacent structure. The brochoscopy was perfomed which showed the yellowish granulous aspect and the pathophysiology revealed a pulmonary actinomycosis. The patient was treated with antibiotic based on parenteral infusion of penicillin G at 20 million / day for 6 weeks relayed by oral administration of 3 g / day for 3 months with a good response and the left basal opacity disappeared on the CT control but the mediastinal mass persisted. After multidisciplinary concertation, the mediastinoscopy was perfomed and has revealed an ectopic thyroid which was removed by Uniportal Videoassisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (U-VATS) approach. DISCUSSION: The first case of ectopic thyroid gland was described by Hickman in 1869, since a few cases have been reported by the literature. Its prevalence is about 1 per 100 000-300 000 people, rising to 1 per 4000-8000 patients with thyroid disease. The main techniques indicated in the management of undetermined lesions of the anterior mediastinum, are midline exploratory sternotomy, anterior lateral thoracotomy and VATS. U-VATS has demonstrated its feasibility and safety compared to conventional techniques by several advantages. CONCLUSION: Ectopic mediastinal thyroid is an unusual presentation of thyroid pathology. Complete surgical resection remains a therapeutic and a key diagnosis. The aim of this study is to prouve the feasibility, efficiency and efficacity of U-VATS approach as minimally invasive thoracic surgery for mediastinal mass resection.

Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has recently emerged as an alternative procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether U-VATS has advantages over multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of two databases (Pubmed and Web of Science) to search comparative studies of U-VATS and M-VATS anatomical pulmonary resection for NSCLC. Operative time, blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, drainage duration, length of postoperative stay, pain in postoperative day 1(POD1) and conversion rates were retrieved to estimate the comparison of outcomes. A subgroup analysis stratified by study type (propensity-matched analysis and randomized-controlled trial versus non-propensity matched analysis) was performed. RESULT: A total of 20 studies with 4142 patients were included in this meta-analysis. U-VATS was performed on 1869 patients, whereas the other 2173 patients underwent M-VATS. This meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in operative time (U-VATS: 146.48 ± 55.07 min versus M-VATS: 171.70 ± 79.40 min, P = 0.81), blood loss (74.49 ± 109.03 mL versus 95.48 ± 133.67 mL, P = 0.18), resected lymph nodes (17.28 ± 9.46 versus 18.31 ± 10.17, P = 0.62), conversion rate (6.18% versus 4.34%, P = 0.14), drainage duration (3.90 ± 2.94 days versus 4.44 ± 3.12 days, p = 0.09), length of postoperative stay (6.16 ± 4.40 days versus 6.45 ± 4.80 days, P = 0.22), and pain in POD1 (3.94 ± 1.68 versus 3.59 ± 2.76, p = 0.07). Subgroup analysis showed the value of PSM and RCT group consistency with overall value. CONCLUSION: This up-to-date meta-analysis shows that the perioperative outcomes of U-VATS and M-VATS anatomical pulmonary resection are equivalent. In addition, the differences in long-term outcomes of these two approaches are still unclear. Thoracic surgeons should pay more emphasize on providing high-quality and personalized surgical care for patients, to improve the survival ultimately.

Uniportal VATS approach to sub-lobar anatomic resections: literature review and personal experience.

Surgical scientific literature contains relatively little information regarding the surgical outcomes of anatomic sublobar resections performed with the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) technique. This paper attempts to evaluate the role of U-VATS segmentectomies in the landscape of a minimally invasive approach to the treatment of early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy approach to the management of non-pulmonary diseases of the chest.

The use of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy (u-VATS) is becoming a commonly used surgical technique and can be an effective approach for the surgical treatment of many pulmonary and non-pulmonary conditions. This review article summarizes current medical evidence informing the practice of u-VATS for treating non-pulmonary conditions including hyperhidrosis, hemothorax, pleural effusion, and thymic disease.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery reduced the occurrence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome after lobectomy for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is difficult for thoracic surgeons to manage. PTPS should never arise after minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS), a form of MIS for thoracic disease, has become more common around the world and might reduce the risk of PTPS after thoracic surgery. We compared the frequencies of PTPS after U-VATS-based and multi-port VATS (M-VATS)-based lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: We compared the data for 142 and 70 cases in which U-VATS- and M-VATS-based lobectomies were performed, respectively. General surgical outcomes, the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, analgesic usage, and neuropathic pain according to the pain DETECT questionnaire (PDQ) were assessed. The presence of >1 of the following items at two postoperative months (POM) was used to diagnose PTPS: (I) an NRS score of >3, (II) analgesic use, and (III) exhibiting >1 of a list of 7 symptoms according to the PDQ. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of dissected lymph nodes, or the duration of the drainage period or hospital stay. In the U-VATS and M-VATS groups, the mean NRS score during two postoperative months was 0.5±0.1 and 1.5±0.3, respectively (P<0.01), and analgesics were used for a mean of 7.3±1.5 and 13.3±1.8 days, respectively, during the postoperative 2 months (P<0.01). As for the frequency of PTPS-related symptoms on postoperative month (POM) 2, allodynia (U-VATS: 2.1% vs. M-VATS: 10%, P=0.028), hypoesthesia (2.1% vs. 10%, P=0.028), and numbness (1.4% vs. 8.6%, P=0.029) often arose in both groups. PTPS occurred in 2.8% and 11.4% of the patients in the U-VATS and M-VATS groups, respectively (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with M-VATS, U-VATS exhibited a significantly lower incidence of PTPS.

Learning curve of uniportal video-assisted lobectomy: analysis of 15-month experience in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic (U-VATS) lobectomy has been becoming the technique of choice in an increasing number of centers. The aim of our study was to review our experience, evaluating the learning curve of U-VATS for lung lobectomy and outcomes. METHODS: The prospectively collected clinical data of 43 consecutive patients, undergone U-VATS lobectomy from June 2016 to September 2017, were reviewed. The cumulative sum analysis was applied for defining the completion of learning curve (CLC), evaluating the relationship between operative time and the consecutive number of operations. RESULTS: The mean operative time of Uniportal VATS lobectomy was 179.93±43.41 min. According to the cumulative sum analysis, the CLC was reached after 25 patients. Using the cut-off of 25 patients, the whole populations was divided in group A (first 25 patients of the experience) and group B (the last 18 patients). The mean operative time in group B was significantly shorter than in group A (164.00±24.46 vs. 191.40±50.45 min, respectively, P=0.04). There were no differences in demographic characteristics, number of removed lymph nodes, chest tube duration, and hospital stay among the two groups. The number of conversions was higher in group A (4 vs. 0; P=0.07), as the number of major complications, like reoperations for bleeding (2 vs. 0; P=0.22). There was no postoperative 30-day-related death. CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS lobectomy seems to be a quite safe and feasible procedure, with a steep learning curve and low complication rate, if performed by experienced surgeons after proper training.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of pleural empyema.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in the treatment of pleural empyema has recently been proven. Till today, very few works evaluated the role of uniportal-VATS (U-VATS) approach in the treatment of pleural empyema even if it currently represents the most innovative and less invasive thoracoscopic approach. We report our experience with U-VATS in the treatment of pleural empyema. METHODS: A retrospective bicentric analysis of 35 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment of stage II and stage III pleural empyema was performed, from January 2015 to May 2017. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 57.26±18.29 years and 54.3% of them were males. In 85.7% of the cases, empyema was related to a complicated parapneumonic effusion; in only 5 cases it was a post-surgical consequence. All patients were treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and subsequent target therapy for 14.62±21.76 days prior to operation and 23 patients needed the placement of a chest tube. Twenty patients (57.1%) presented with stage III, 11 patients (31.4%) stage II and 4 patients (11.4%) stage I empyema. Complete debridement and decortication were obtained in all patients through U-VATS approach and no conversion or further access was needed for any reason. No major complication was recorded. Only 2 cases of trapped lung were not responsive to surgical treatment. At a mean follow-up of 247.42±306.29 days, 33 patients (94.3%) were alive with no recurrence, 2 patients died for causes unrelated to the operation. CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, we consider U-VATS as an adequate procedure in the treatment of "stages II and III" empyemas when the necessary surgical expertise has been achieved. Indeed, U-VATS permits an easier performance and complete debridement and decortication, with a very low risk for conversion and excellent postoperative outcomes in terms of less pain, fast recovery and cosmetic results.

Uniportal vs. triportal video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of primary pneumothorax-a propensity matched bicentric study.

BACKGROUND: The role of triportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely recognized for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the potential advantages of uniportal VATS (U-VATS) for the treatment of PSP compared with triportal VATS. METHODS: A total of 104 triportal (n=39) and uniportal (n=65) VATS procedures where performed for the treatment of PSP in two University hospitals. The prospectively collected data of postoperative outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the two VATS approaches. RESULTS: No major adverse events occurred after operation. Compared with triportal-VATS, Uniportal-VATS showed the same effectiveness in terms of risk of recurrence (null in both groups), post-operative complications (P=1.000) and operating time (66.04±16.92 vs. 74.57±21.38 min, P=0.141). However, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of uniportal-VATS in terms of necessity of further access [0 vs. 7 (30.4%), P=0.004], chest tube duration (4.39±1.41 vs. 6.32±0.94 days, P<<0.001), postoperative hospital stay (4.78±1.31 vs. 6.61±1.67 days, P<<0.001), visual analogue pain score (VAS) at 24 hours (3.45±1.41 vs. 6.44±2.45, P<<0.001), number of patients who had pain after chest drain removal [1 (4.3%) vs. 16 (69.6%), P<<0.001], VAS after drainage removal (0.11±0.47 vs. 2.74±2.25, P<<0.001), postoperative pain duration (2.50±1.20 vs. 14.82±37.41 days, P<<0.001), pain killers intake (0.75±1.06 vs. 7.53±3.96 days, P=0.001), chronic paresthesia (level scale: 0 to 2; 0 vs. 0.52±0.66, P<<0.001), chronic neuralgia (0 vs. 0.43±0.59, P<<0.001) and cosmetic results (level scale: 0 to 3; 2.91±0.28 vs. 2.00±0.77, P<<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS is feasible and safe and may be a less invasive alternative to triportal VATS for the treatment of PSP because of its effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain, paresthesia, hospital stay and in improving cosmetic results.

A word of caution-when uniportal VATS should not be done.

Uniportal VATS (U-VATS) is gaining more and more popularity. Herein, we discuss the current status of adoption of the technique and-from a "laggard's" point of view-some situations when the use of U-VATS should be reconsidered. As we all do lack scientific evidence for the superiority of one minimally invasive approach over the other, these situations reflect a gut feeling rather than solid arguments. The article should raise awareness of currently discussed issues with minimally invasive approaches. Finally, it highlights the need for randomized controlled trials, if we really want to rank minimally invasive accesses.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery treatment of intra-operative complications.

BACKGROUND: The uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) approach is rapidly gaining attention. Still there is lack of gross engagement to this technique, even within the VATS surgeons. We believe that the uniportal approach needs the same attention as any newly introduced skill; it would be a great mistake to be considered as a simple variation of the standardised multi-portal VATS. METHODS: We have evaluated personal and institutional experience, supported by international bibliography. Factors that could influence complications have been searched. Factors have been split to operator-related and patient-related. RESULTS: We have identified a series of preventable complications. The operator-related ones, need addressing prior to engagement to surgery. A well-structured team led by the surgeon functions in benefit of the patient. A wise and skilled surgeon in synergy with the surgical team can be prepared to resolve the most common presented challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Our collected experience may be a guide to facilitate the U-VATS journey.