Advanced Interatrial block induced by flecainide.

We present a case of advanced interatrial block induced by flecainide toxicity. We discuss the implications of this conduction abnormality.

Advanced Interatrial Block across the Spectrum of Renal Function.

Background and Objective: Interatrial block (IAB) is defined as a conduction delay between the right and left atria. No data are available about the prevalence of both partial IAB and advanced IAB among the different stages of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and type of advanced IAB across the spectrum of renal function, including patients on dialysis and the clinical characteristics associated with advanced IAB. Materials and Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of 151 patients consecutively admitted to the Nephrology and Ophthalmology Unit for 3 months. The study population was divided into three groups according to stages of chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the prevalence and pattern of IAB among the groups and the clinical characteristics associated with advanced IAB. Results: The prevalence of partial IAB was significantly lower in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) group compared to control group (36.7% vs. 59.6%; p = 0.02); in contrast the prevalence of advanced IAB was significantly higher in both chronic kidney disease (CKD) (17.8% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.04) and ESKD group (24.5% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.005) compared to control group. The atypical pattern of advanced IAB was more frequent in both the ESKD and CKD group than in the control group (100% and 75% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.02). Overall, among patients that showed advanced IAB, 17 (73.9%) showed an atypical pattern by morphology and 2 (8.7%) showed an atypical pattern by duration of advanced IAB. The ESKD group was younger than the control group (65.7 ± 12.3 years vs. 71.3 ± 9.9 years; p = 0.01) and showed a higher prevalence of beta blockers (42.9% vs. 19.3%; p = 0.009), as in the CKD group (37.8% vs. 19.3%; p= 0.04). Conclusions: The progressive worsening of renal function was associated with an increasing prevalence of advanced IAB. Advanced IAB may be a sign of uremic cardiomyopathy and may suggest further evaluation with long-term follow-up to investigate its prognostic significance in chronic kidney disease.

[MVP Risk score and new atrial fibrillation diagnosis: Prospective cohort PREFATE study]. / MVP Risk score y nuevo diagnóstico de fibrilación auricular: estudio de cohorte prospectivo PREFATE.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns according to the MVP ECG risk score (morphology-voltage-P-wave duration) and a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation (AF). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study (1/01/2023-31/12/2024). SITE: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Randomized sample of 150 patients aged 65-85 years without prior diagnosis of AF, stroke, or current anticoagulant treatment; high risk of future AF; CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2; and ability to use the FibricheckR application (App). MEASUREMENTS: At baseline, a standard ECG, MVP risk score assessment, and cardiac rhythm monitoring for 15 days using the FibricheckR App were performed. The dependent variables were the presence of P-wave patterns on the electrocardiogram according to MVP risk score and a new diagnosis of AF. RESULTS: The diagnosis of AF was confirmed in 14 cases (9.3%, 95% CI 5.6-15.1), 3 men and 11 women. In 3 cases, the arrhythmia was diagnosed on the baseline ECG, and in 11 cases by Holter after being reported as possible AF by the FibricheckR App. A higher prevalence of atypical advanced interatrial block (A-AIB) (p 0.007) was detected among participants with AF, as well as the prevalence of P-wave <0.1mV. (p=0.006). All new diagnoses of AF were made at scores ≥4 in the MVP risk score. CONCLUSIONS: Using scales for identifying ECG patterns in high-risk subjects in primary care can facilitate the diagnosis of unknown AF.

New electrocardiographic aspects of the P wave: Its value in clinical cardiology.

In this article, we will comment on new aspects of P-wave morphology that help us to better diagnose atrial blocks and atrial enlargement, and their clinical implications. These include: (1) Atypical ECG patterns of advanced interatrial block; (2) The ECG diagnosis of left atrial enlargement versus interatrial block; (3) Atrial fibrillation and advanced interatrial block: The two sides of the same coin; and (4) P-wave parameters: Clinical implications.

Asymmetric remodeling between the left and right atria in patients with advanced interatrial block and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Advanced interatrial block (A-IAB) on electrocardiography (ECG) represents the conduction delay between the left and right atria. We investigated the association of A-IAB with left and right atrial (LA/RA) remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We enrolled 74 patients who underwent ECG, cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and echocardiography during sinus rhythm before catheter ablation of AF. A-IAB was defined as P-wave duration ≥120 ms with a biphasic morphology in leads III and aVF or notched morphology in lead II. We compared the maximum and minimum LA/RA volume indices (max and min LAV/RAVI), LA/RA expansion index (LAEI/RAEI), and total, passive, and active LA/RA emptying fraction (LAEF/RAEF) between patients with and without A-IAB. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients (mean age, 64.3 ± 9.6 years), 35 (47%) showed A-IAB. Patients with A-IAB had a significantly higher likelihood of hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction than those without. Patients with A-IAB had significantly larger max (69.2 [60.7-79.7]mL/m2 vs. 60.9 [50.4-68.3]mL/m2, P < 0.01) and min (44.0 [37.2-52.1]mL/m2 vs. 34.1 [29.2-43.5]mL/m2, P < 0.01) LAVI than those without. The max and min RAVI were not significantly different between groups. LAEI (55.1 [48.2-78.5]% vs. 72.1 [57.8-84.8]%, P < 0.05), total LAEF (35.5 [32.5-44.0]% vs. 41.9 [36.6-45.9]%, P < 0.05), and passive LAEF (12.2 [10.0-14.4]% vs. 15.5 [11.2-19.6]%, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in patients with A-IAB than without. CONCLUSIONS: A-IAB was associated with LA, but not RA enlargement, in patients with AF. A-IAB may indicate LA functional remodeling in the reservoir and conduit phases.

Resumption of interatrial conduction after atrial premature beat in baseline interatrial aberrancy.

Interatrial block (IAB) is a delay or blockage of interatrial conduction from the right atrium to the left atrium, causing prolongation of the P-wave duration on the electrocardiogram. This condition is unfortunately not uncommon in clinical practice, especially among the elderly. It is often overlooked because the P wave is small and abnormalities can be difficult to detect. An isolated IAB does not usually cause any abnormal symptoms and may not require any specific treatment. Nevertheless, a relationship between an IAB and other cardiovascular conditions including left atrial electromechanical dysfunction, atrial remodeling, atrial fibrosis, atrial fibrillation, and stroke has been reported. Early diagnosis of this condition is critical. This case report presents a functional interatrial block or interatrial aberrancy that returned to normal after an atrial premature complex where the interatrial conduction remained normal in subsequent beats.

A rare combination of atrial and intraventricular conduction disturbances: Atypical type I advanced interatrial block, left posterior fascicular block and transient right bundle branch block.

According to the first 2012 consensus report about interatrial block, the diagnosis of advanced interatrial block (A-IAB) consists of a P-wave duration ≥120 ms with biphasic "plus-minus" (±) polarity in the three leads of the inferior wall in the electrocardiogram. At the end of 2018, a new concept was introduced: the atypical A-IAB due to changes in the polarity or duration of the P-wave. The prevalence of these atypical patterns in different scenarios is currently unknown, but the patterns should be considered as risk factors of embolic stroke of undetermined source. When the A-IAB pattern is associated with clinical arrhythmic manifestations, it is known as the Bayés' Syndrome. We present a characteristic case of atypical A-IAB, and the rare left posterior fascicular block and transient right bundle branch block.

Atypical advanced interatrial blocks: Definition and electrocardiographic recognition.

The diagnosis of advanced interatrial block (A-IAB) is done by surface ECG analysis when the P-wave ≥120 ms with biphasic (±) morphology in leads II, III and aVF. In this brief communication, we advance a new concept involving atypical patterns of A-IAB due to changes about the morphology or duration of the P-wave. It remains to be determined its real prevalence in different clinical scenarios, and whether these atypical ECG patterns should be considered as predictors of atrial fibrillation/stroke.

Changing P-wave morphology: What is the mechanism?

A 76-year-old woman, affected by drugs resistant focal atrial tachycardia, underwent a catheter ablation procedure in our Hospital. During ablations we observed on the surface ECG a progressive modification of the second component of the P wave (delayed and then negative in inferior leads). These findings demonstrated, compared to the beginning of the procedure, a different propagation of the activation wave from the right to the left atrium, helped to identify the true origin of a focal atrial tachycardia. Moreover, this case underlined the importance of the Bachmann's bundle for the impulse propagation through the interatrial septum in normal hearts.

Echocardiography and Electrocardiography in Detecting Atrial Cardiomyopathy: A Promising Path to Predicting Cardioembolic Strokes and Atrial Fibrillation.

(1) Background: Atrial cardiomyopathy constitutes an intrinsically prothrombotic atrial substrate that may promote atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events, especially stroke, independently of the arrhythmia. Atrial reservoir strain is the echocardiography marker with the most robust evidence supporting its prognostic utility. The main aim of this study is to identify atrial cardiomyopathy by investigating the association between left atrial dysfunction in echocardiography and P-wave abnormalities in the surface electrocardiogram. (2) Methods: This is a community-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study. A randomized sample of 100 patients at a high risk of developing atrial fibrillation were evaluated using diverse echocardiography imaging techniques, and a standard electrocardiogram. (3) Results: Significant left atrial dysfunction, expressed by a left atrial reservoir strain < 26%, showed a relationship with the dilation of the left atrium (p < 0.001), the left atrial ejection fraction < 50% (p < 0.001), the presence of advanced interatrial block (p = 0.032), P-wave voltage in lead I < 0.1 mV (p = 0.008), and MVP ECG score (p = 0.036). (4) Conclusions: A significant relationship was observed between left atrial dysfunction and the presence of left atrial enlargement and other electrocardiography markers; all of them are non-invasive biomarkers of atrial cardiomyopathy.

Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Post-cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Typical Atrial Flutter Without History of Atrial Fibrillation.

Aims: The aim was to describe the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFL) without history of AF and to identify risk factors for new-onset AF after the procedure. Methods: A total of 191 patients with typical AFL undergoing successful CTI ablation were enrolled. Patients who had history of AF, structural heart disease, cardiac surgery, or ablation or who received antiarrhythmic drug after procedure were excluded. Clinical and electrophysiological data were collected. Results: There were 47 patients (24.6%) developing new AF during a follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.9 years after CTI ablation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that the cut-off values of left atrial diameter (LAD) and CHA2DS2-VASc score were 42 mm and 2, with area under the curve of 0.781 and 0.550, respectively. The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) [hazard ratio (HR) 3.734, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.470-9.484, P = 0.006], advanced interatrial block (aIAB) (HR 2.034, 95% CI 1.017-4.067, P = 0.045), LAD > 42 mm (HR 2.710, 95% CI 1.478-4.969, P = 0.001), and CHA2DS2-VASc score > 2 (HR 2.123, 95% CI 1.118-4.034, P = 0.021) were independent risk factors of new-onset AF. Conclusion: A combination of OSA, aIAB, LAD > 42 mm, and CHA2DS2-VASc > 2 was a strongly high risk for new-onset AF after ablation for typical AFL, and it had significance in postablation management in clinical practice.

Association between advanced interatrial block and small vessel diseases in the brain.

BACKGROUND: The latest evidence shows the association of atrial cardiopathy with embolic strokes of undetermined source. Advanced interatrial block (aIAB) is an electrophysiological mark of atrial cardiopathy. This study investigated the relationship between aIAB and the burden of silent cerebral small vessel diseases (SVD) on magnetic resonance imaging in the absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 499 patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), who were free of AF, atrial flutter, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome in our hospital. aIAB was ascertained by digital electrocardiograms. Left atrial diameter, LVEF, and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) were measured on echocardiograms. Based on the presence of 4 manifestations of SVD, including white matter hyperintensity (WMH), lacunes, microbleeds, and enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) on magnetic resonance imaging, an ordinal SVD score (range, 0-4) was devised to reflect the total burden of cerebral SVD. The ordinal regression model was used to explore the association of aIAB with SVD burden after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.7 years, and 327 (65.5%) were male. A total of 23 (4.6%) patients had aIAB. The number of patients with cerebral SVD scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 92 (18.4%), 122 (24.4%), 190 (38.1%), 83 (16.6%), and 12 (2.4%), respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, left atrial diameter, LVEF, and LVPWT, the regression model showed a significant association of aIAB with cerebral SVD score (OR =2.408, 95% CI, 1.082-5.366). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial cardiopathy indexed by aIAB was independently associated with a high burden of SVD in the brain.

Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on atrial fibrillation recurrence after accessory pathway ablation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Although successful ablation of the accessory pathway (AP) eliminates atrial fibrillation (AF) in some of patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and paroxysmal AF, in other patients it can recur. HYPOTHESIS: Whether adding pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) after successful AP ablation effectively prevents AF recurrence in patients with WPW syndrome is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 160 patients (102 men, 58 women; mean age, 46 ± 14 years) with WPW syndrome and paroxysmal AF who underwent AP ablation, namely 103 (64.4%) undergoing only AP ablation (AP group) and 57 (35.6%) undergoing AP ablation plus PVI (AP + PVI group). Advanced interatrial block (IAB) was defined as a P-wave duration of >120 ms and biphasic (±) morphology in the inferior leads, using 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 30.9 ± 9.2 months (range, 3-36 months), 22 patients (13.8%) developed AF recurrence. The recurrence rate did not differ in patients in the AP + PVI group and AP group (15.5% vs 10.5%, respectively; P = .373). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that PVI was not associated with the risk of AF recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.68; P = .380). In WPW patients with advanced IAB, the recurrence rate was lower in patients in the AP + PVI group vs the AP group (90% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: PVI after successful AP ablation significantly reduced the AF recurrence rate in WPW patients with advanced IAB. Screening of a resting 12-lead ECG immediately after AP ablation helps identify patients in whom PVI is beneficial.

Differential characteristics of the typical and atypical advanced interatrial block.

Objetivo: Se denomina bloqueo interauricular avanzado (BIA) a la existencia de una onda P ≥ 120 ms y bifásica +/- en las derivaciones inferiores (II-III-VF) del electrocardiograma (ECG) de superficie, el cual constituye un factor predictivo significativo del desarrollo de fibrilación auricular. En fecha reciente se han descrito cuatro patrones de BIA atípicos (BIA-At) con base en la morfología y la duración de la onda P, sin conocer si comparten patogenia y características clínicas similares. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de pacientes, visitados en el Servicio de Cardiología, en ritmo sinusal y con BIA. Las variables analizadas se obtuvieron de la historia clínica informatizada. El análisis de la onda P se efectuó al aumentar el tamaño del electrocardiograma y mediante calipers electrónicos. El análisis estadístico se realizó con SPSS 19.0, con nivel de significación de p < 0.05. Resultados: Se incluyó a 75 pacientes con media de edad de 74.4 ± 11.7 años, con 62.7% de varones. Se compararon los grupos de pacientes con BIA típico (BIA-T) y BIA-At. El primero se relacionó con la existencia de diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), enfermedad renal crónica estadio ≥ 3 (p = 0.036), bloqueo auriculoventricular (p = 0.006) y una menor fracción de expulsión ventricular media (p = 0.025); no hubo diferencias respecto de la prevalencia de fibrilación auricular/flúter o accidente cerebrovascular. Sólo la diabetes se acompañó de riesgo de ser un BIA-T (OR: 6.4; p = 0.002; IC 95%: 2.0-21.1). Conclusiones: La diabetes mellitus constituye el único factor de riesgo de que un BIA sea típico. Los pacientes con BIA-T y BIA-At presentan similar prevalencia de fibrilación auricular y accidente cerebrovascular, por lo que son objeto de un mismo tratamiento clínico. Objective: It is called advanced interatrial block (IAB) to the existence of a P wave ≥ 120 ms and biphasic ± in the lower leads II-III-VF of the surface electrocardiogram (ECG), which constitutes a significant predictive factor for the development of atrial fibrillation. Recently, four patterns of atypical aIAB (At-IAB) have been described based on the morphology and duration of the P wave, but it's unknown if they share the same pathogenesis and clinical characteristics. Method: An observational, descriptive and retrospective study was performed with patients, visited in cardiology, who have a sinus rhythm and with aIAB. The analyzed variables were obtained from the computerized clinical history. The analysis of the P wave was made by increasing the size of the ECG and by electronic calipers. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0; level of significance: p < 0.05. Results: A total of 75 patients with an average age of 74.4 ± 11.7 years and with a 62.7% males, were included. It was compared the group of patients with typical aIAB (T-aIAB) and with At-aIAB. The first one was associated with the existence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), chronic kidney disease stage ≥ 3 (p = 0.036), atrioventricular block (p = 0.006) and a lower mean ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.025); there were no differences regarding the prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter or stroke. Only diabetes was associated with the risk of T-aIAB (odds ratio: 6.4; p = 0.002; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-21.1). Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus is the only risk factor for an aIAB to be typical. Patients with T-aIAB and At-aIAB have a similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke, so they must follow the same clinical management.

Advanced interatrial block predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation after accessory pathway ablation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Although successful ablation of the accessory pathway (AP) eliminates paroxysmal AF in some patients, in other patients it can recur. HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the clinical utility of advanced interatrial block (IAB) for predicting the risk of AF recurrence in patients with verified paroxysmal AF and WPW syndrome after successful AP ablation. METHODS: This retrospective study included 103 patients (70 men, 33 women; mean age, 44 ± 16 years) with WPW syndrome who had paroxysmal AF. A resting 12-lead electrocardiogram was performed immediately after successful AP ablation to evaluate the presence of advanced IAB, which was defined as a P-wave duration of >120 ms and biphasic [±] morphology in the inferior leads. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 30.9 ± 20.0 months (range, 2-71 months), 16 patients (15.5%) developed AF recurrence. Patients with advanced IAB had significantly reduced event-free survival from AF (P < .001). Cox regression analysis with adjustment for the left atrial diameter and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score identified advanced IAB (hazard ratio, 9.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-36.72; P = .002) and age > 50 years (hazard ratio, 12.64; 95% CI, 1.33-119.75; P = .027) as independent predictors of AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced IAB was an independent predictor of AF recurrence after successful AP ablation in patients with WPW syndrome.

Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following a successful electrical cardioversion (ECV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that AF recurrence is related to atrial electrical inhomogeneity, which may influence the P wave characteristics. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-one consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent ECV were enrolled, and evaluated for AF recurrences one month after the ECV. Patients with open-heart surgery, a history of catheter ablation, and an unsuccessful ECV were excluded. The P wave duration, dispersion and P wave morphology were evaluated by 12­lead ECGs 30 min after the ECV. RESULTS: In total, 141 patients were investigated. One month after the ECV, 60 (43%) patients maintained sinus rhythm. The advanced interatrial block (aIAB; P wave duration >120 ms and biphasic P waves in the inferior leads) (Hazard ratio [HR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-14.01, P = 0.009), P wave dispersion (HR, 1.06; 95%CI 1.02-1.09, P = 0.001), and duration of AF per month (HR, 1.03; 95%CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. An aIAB was not associated with structural parameters such as the left atrial volume index or right atrial area. There were no differences in the serum BNP level and frequency of administering anti-arrhythmic drugs between the patients with and without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of AF recurrence after the ECV can be predicted by the P wave characteristics. A longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF also had a tendency for recurrence.

Advanced interatrial block predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure: The "Bayes' Syndrome-HF" study.

AIMS: Advanced interatrial block (IAB) is characterized by a prolonged (≥120 ms) and bimodal P wave in the inferior leads. The association between advanced IAB and atrial fibrillation (AF) is known as "Bayes' Syndrome", and there is scarce information about it in heart failure (HF). We examined the prevalence of IAB and whether advanced IAB could predict new-onset AF and/or stroke in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prospective observational "Bayes' Syndrome-HF" study included consecutive outpatients with chronic HF. The primary endpoints were new-onset AF, ischemic stroke, and the composite of both. A secondary endpoint included all-cause death alone or in combination with the primary endpoint. Comprehensive multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. Among 1050 consecutive patients, 536 (51.0%) were in sinus rhythm, 464 with a measurable P wave are the focus of this study. Two-hundred and sixty patients (56.0%) had normal atrial conduction, 95 (20.5%) partial IAB, and 109 (23.5%) advanced IAB. During a mean follow-up of 4.5 ±â€¯2.1 years, 235 patients experienced all-cause death, new-onset AF, or stroke. In multivariable comprehensive Cox regression analyses, advanced IAB was associated with new-onset AF (HR 2.71 [1.61-4.56], P < 0.001), ischemic stroke (HR 3.02 [1.07-8.53], P = 0.04), and the composite of both (HR 2.42 [1.41-4.15], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF advanced IAB predicts new-onset AF and ischemic stroke. Future studies must assess whether anticoagulant treatment in Bayes' Syndrome leads to better outcomes in HF.

Advanced interatrial block predicts clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that advanced interatrial block (IAB) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the impact of advanced IAB on recurrence of paroxysmal AF after catheter ablation is not clear. METHODS: 204 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent index circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation were prospectively enrolled. In all patients, a resting electrocardiogram in sinus rhythm was evaluated for the presence of advanced IAB, defined as a P-wave duration >120ms and biphasic (±) morphology in the inferior leads. Advanced IAB was detected in 20.1% of patients. AF recurrence was defined as the occurrence of confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting more than 30s beyond 3 months after the catheter ablation in the absence of any antiarrhythmic treatment. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 13.9±6.2 months (range, 3-27 months), 62 patients (30.4%) developed recurrence of AF. The recurrence rate was higher in patients with advanced IAB than those without advanced IAB (46.3% vs. 26.4%, p=0.006). Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, P-wave duration, CHADS2 score, and PV isolation identified advanced IAB (hazard ratio, 2.111; 95% confidence interval, 1.034-4.308; p=0.040) and left atrial diameter (hazard ratio, 1.051; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1.100; p=0.034) as two independent predictors of recurrence of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced IAB were at an increased risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Características diferenciales del bloqueo interauricular avanzado típico y atípico / Differential characteristics of the typical and atypical advanced interatrial block

Resumen Objetivo: Se denomina bloqueo interauricular avanzado (BIA) a la existencia de una onda P ≥ 120 ms y bifásica +/- en las derivaciones inferiores (II-III-VF) del electrocardiograma (ECG) de superficie, el cual constituye un factor predictivo significativo del desarrollo de fibrilación auricular. En fecha reciente se han descrito cuatro patrones de BIA atípicos (BIA-At) con base en la morfología y la duración de la onda P, sin conocer si comparten patogenia y características clínicas similares. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de pacientes, visitados en el Servicio de Cardiología, en ritmo sinusal y con BIA. Las variables analizadas se obtuvieron de la historia clínica informatizada. El análisis de la onda P se efectuó al aumentar el tamaño del electrocardiograma y mediante calipers electrónicos. El análisis estadístico se realizó con SPSS 19.0, con nivel de significación de p < 0.05. Resultados: Se incluyó a 75 pacientes con media de edad de 74.4 ± 11.7 años, con 62.7% de varones. Se compararon los grupos de pacientes con BIA típico (BIA-T) y BIA-At. El primero se relacionó con la existencia de diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), enfermedad renal crónica estadio ≥ 3 (p = 0.036), bloqueo auriculoventricular (p = 0.006) y una menor fracción de expulsión ventricular media (p = 0.025); no hubo diferencias respecto de la prevalencia de fibrilación auricular/flúter o accidente cerebrovascular. Sólo la diabetes se acompañó de riesgo de ser un BIA-T (OR: 6.4; p = 0.002; IC 95%: 2.0-21.1). Conclusiones: La diabetes mellitus constituye el único factor de riesgo de que un BIA sea típico. Los pacientes con BIA-T y BIA-At presentan similar prevalencia de fibrilación auricular y accidente cerebrovascular, por lo que son objeto de un mismo tratamiento clínico.

Abstract Objective: It is called advanced interatrial block (IAB) to the existence of a P wave ≥ 120 ms and biphasic ± in the lower leads II-III-VF of the surface electrocardiogram (ECG), which constitutes a significant predictive factor for the development of atrial fibrillation. Recently, four patterns of atypical aIAB (At-IAB) have been described based on the morphology and duration of the P wave, but it’s unknown if they share the same pathogenesis and clinical characteristics. Method: An observational, descriptive and retrospective study was performed with patients, visited in cardiology, who have a sinus rhythm and with aIAB. The analyzed variables were obtained from the computerized clinical history. The analysis of the P wave was made by increasing the size of the ECG and by electronic calipers. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0; level of significance: p < 0.05. Results: A total of 75 patients with an average age of 74.4 ± 11.7 years and with a 62.7% males, were included. It was compared the group of patients with typical aIAB (T-aIAB) and with At-aIAB. The first one was associated with the existence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), chronic kidney disease stage ≥ 3 (p = 0.036), atrioventricular block (p = 0.006) and a lower mean ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.025); there were no differences regarding the prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter or stroke. Only diabetes was associated with the risk of T-aIAB (odds ratio: 6.4; p = 0.002; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-21.1). Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus is the only risk factor for an aIAB to be typical. Patients with T-aIAB and At-aIAB have a similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke, so they must follow the same clinical management.