Arthroscopic stabilization surgery for first-time anterior shoulder dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations (FTASDs) remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic stabilization surgery for FTASDs through a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 18, 2022, for single-arm or comparative studies assessing FTASDs managed with arthroscopic stabilization surgery following first-time dislocation. Eligible comparative studies included studies assessing outcomes following immobilization for an FTASD, or arthroscopic stabilization following recurrent dislocations. Eligible levels of evidence were I to IV. Primary outcomes included rates of shoulder redislocations, cumulative shoulder instability, and subsequent shoulder stabilization surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with 2222 shoulder dislocations were included. Of these, 5 studies (n = 408 shoulders) were randomized trials comparing immobilization to arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) after a first dislocation. Another 16 studies were nonrandomized comparative studies assessing arthroscopic Bankart repair following first-time dislocation (ABR-F) to either immobilization (studies = 8, n = 399 shoulders) or arthroscopic Bankart repair following recurrent dislocations (ABR-R) (studies = 8, n = 943 shoulder). Mean follow-up was 59.4 ± 39.2 months across all studies. Cumulative loss to follow-up was 4.7% (range, 0%-32.7%). A composite rate of pooled redislocation, cumulative instability, and reoperations across ABR-F studies was 6.8%, 11.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. Meta-analysis found statistically significant reductions in rates of redislocation (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.3, P < .001), cumulative instability (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.03-0.08, P < .001), and subsequent surgery (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04-0.15, P < .001) when comparing ABR-F to immobilization. Rates of cumulative instability (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.47, P < .001) and subsequent surgery rates (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.76, P = .01) were significantly reduced with ABR-F relative to ABR-R, with point estimate of effect favoring ABR-F for shoulder redislocation rates (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.19-1.83, P = .36). Return to sport rates to preoperative levels or higher were 3.87 times higher following ABR-F compared to immobilization (95% CI 1.57-9.52, P < .001), with limited ABR-R studies reporting this outcome. The median fragility index of the 5 included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was 2, meaning reversing only 2 outcome events rendered the trials' findings no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic stabilization surgery for FTASDs leads to lower rates of redislocations, cumulative instability, and subsequent stabilization surgery relative to immobilization or arthroscopic stabilization surgery following recurrence. Although a limited number of RCTs have been published on the subject matter to date, the strength of their conclusions is limited by a small sample size and statistically fragile results.

Adherence of Patients to Methods of Self-Reduction of Shoulder Dislocation Taught via Smartphones: A Medium-Term Follow-up Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Self-reduction of a shoulder dislocation may reduce the time from injury to reduction and to the relief of patient discomfort. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to earlier acquired self-reduction techniques during real-time recurrent shoulder dislocation. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted among 58 patients previously taught shoulder self-reduction via an instructional video sent to their smartphones during a visit to the emergency department (ED) for the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation. Participants were queried on recurrent dislocations, use of self-reduction methods, success rate, the effect that instruction in self-reduction had on their willingness to participate in recreational sports activities, on the decision to avoid surgery, and on the overall level of satisfaction with self-reduction methods. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (77.6%; average age 31.4±11.7 y, 10 females) were available for follow-up at an average 60.8±11.0 mo after the index visit to the ED. Eighteen of 23 patients (78.2%) who experienced a recurrent dislocation during the follow-up period attempted self-reduction, and 12 of them successfully achieved self-reduction. Sixteen patients (35.6%) reported that the knowledge in self-reduction increased their willingness to participate in recreational sports activities, whereas 4 (8.9%) patients reported that knowledge in self-reduction affected their decision not to undergo surgical stabilization. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who sustain recurrent shoulder dislocations should be educated on shoulder self-reduction with the aims of minimizing discomfort, obviating referral to the ED, and motivating participation in recreational activities.

Glenoid segmentation from computed tomography scans based on a 2-stage deep learning model for glenoid bone loss evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The best-fitting circle drawn by computed tomography (CT) reconstruction of the en face view of the glenoid bone to measure the bone defect is widely used in clinical application. However, there are still some limitations in practical application, which can prevent the achievement of accurate measurements. This study aimed to accurately and automatically segment the glenoid from CT scans based on a 2-stage deep learning model and to quantitatively measure the glenoid bone defect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were referred to our institution between June 2018 and February 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The dislocation group consisted of 237 patients with a history of ≥2 unilateral shoulder dislocations within 2 years. The control group consisted of 248 individuals with no history of shoulder dislocation, shoulder developmental deformity, or other disease that may lead to abnormal morphology of the glenoid. All patients underwent CT examination with a 1-mm slice thickness and a 1-mm increment, including complete imaging of the bilateral glenoid. A residual neural network (ResNet) location model and a U-Net bone segmentation model were constructed to develop an automated segmentation model for the glenoid from CT scans. The data set was randomly divided into training (201 of 248) and test (47 of 248) data sets of control-group data and training (190 of 237) and test (47 of 237) data sets of dislocation-group data. The accuracy of the stage 1 (glenoid location) model, the mean intersection-over-union value of the stage 2 (glenoid segmentation) model, and the glenoid volume error were used to assess the performance of the model. The R2 value and Lin concordance correlation coefficient were used to assess the correlation between the prediction and the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 73,805 images were obtained after the labeling process, and each image was composed of CT images of the glenoid and its corresponding mask. The average overall accuracy of stage 1 was 99.28%; the average mean intersection-over-union value of stage 2 was 0.96. The average glenoid volume error between the predicted and true values was 9.33%. The R2 values of the predicted and true values of glenoid volume and glenoid bone loss (GBL) were 0.87 and 0.91, respectively. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient value of the predicted and true values of glenoid volume and GBL were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 2-stage model in this study showed a good performance in glenoid bone segmentation from CT scans and could quantitatively measure GBL, providing a data reference for subsequent clinical treatment.

Short-term Complications of Open Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation.

Background: Anterior dislocation is the most common type of shoulder dislocation, and even after appropriate treatment, recurrence after a primary traumatic anterior dislocation is highly frequent. Surgical options for treating recurrent anterior dislocations mainly include Bankart arthroscopic and Latarjet open surgery. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complication rates of the open Latarjet procedure in a series of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: A total of 55 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation who underwent an open Latarjet procedure were included in this retrospective cohort study. Shoulder range of motion and postoperative complications, including neurapraxia, re-dislocation, hematoma, infection, dehiscence, implant failure, and pain, were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 27.7 ± 6.5 years . The mean time interval after the first dislocation was 3.4 ± 2.7 years . The mean preoperative and postoperative forward flexion (P = 0.200), abduction (P = 0.200), external rotation (P = 0.066), and internal rotation (P = 0.310) were not significantly different. Postoperative complications included 1 case of postoperative musculocutaneous nerve neurapraxia, 1 case of re- dislocation, 1 case of wound dehiscence, and 2 cases of screw breakage. Postoperative pain was also recorded in 11 (20%) patients that were either in the form of occasional night pain (n = 6) or activity-dependent pain (n = 5). Conclusion: Open Latarjet procedure is an efficient procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. However, its rate of complications remains relatively high, and surgeons must consider this drawback in their decision-making and address patients' expectations.

Modified chair method: an easy and efficient reduction method without medication for anterior shoulder dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Various maneuvers have been introduced to address anterior shoulder dislocations. Chair method allows the patient to sit comfortably and feel less pain during the reduction procedure. However, the rarity of comparative studies led to a lack of evidence to popularize. The present study aimed to introduce a modified chair (MOC) reduction method for anterior shoulder dislocation and explore its effectiveness compared with the traditional Hippocratic approach. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of 257 patients with anterior shoulder dislocation from September 2020 and July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the reduction method they received (either the Hippocratic method or the MOC method). Success rate, reduction time, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, satisfaction level, and a new indicator, pain index (reduction time (s)* VAS/ 10), were compared. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients (43 females, 73 males) underwent the Hippocratic method, and 141 (65 females, 76 males) MOC method. A significantly higher success rate was seen in the MOC group (96.5%(136/141) vs. 84.5%(98/116) in the Hippocratic group; OR 5, 95%CI 1.79 ~ 13.91; p = 0.002). Pain index of the patients in the MOC group was much lower than that in the Hippocratic group (3.20 (2.10, 4.53) vs. 36.70 (22.40, 47.25), p <  0.001). The reduction time, VAS pain score, and satisfaction level also favored the MOC method. CONCLUSIONS: The MOC method is an easy and efficient reduction method with minimum assistance for anterior shoulder dislocations. Physicians can skillfully perform this procedure with the help of their body weight. The MOC method could be attempted for shoulder dislocations in the emergency department.

Glenoid bony morphology along long diameter is associated with the occurrence of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: a case-control study based on three-dimensional CT measurements.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study is to compare the anatomic parameters of proximal humerus, glenoid, and glenohumeral joint between patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation (RASD) and patients without RASD with the assistance of three-dimensional (3D) CT scans. METHODS: Sixty patients were included in the study and divided into group RASD and group control. 3D-CT models of shoulder joint for each included patient were reconstructed and multiple anatomic parameters were measured. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in morphological parameters of humerus and glenohumeral joints. Long diameter of glenoid was 3.50 ± 0.34 cm for patients in group RASD and 3.31 ± 0.32 cm in group control (p = 0.039). There was a statistically significant difference in the ratio of long to short diameter of glenoid (p < 0.001). Ratio of humeral head height to glenoid long diameter (Hhh/Gld) was 1.02 ± 0.07 in group RASD, significantly lower than 1.09 ± 0.08 in group control (p = 0.001). Longitudinal depth of glenoid was significantly higher in group RASD (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The glenoid morphology along long diameter is closely correlated with the stability of glenohumeral joint, including glenoid long diameter and glenoid longitudinal depth. It is especially noteworthy that the value of Hhh/Gld decreases in patients with RASD. The difference of Hhh/Gld between the two groups reminds us that the correlation of bony structure along long diameter between glenoid and humeral head plays an important role in RASD.

Early outcomes of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure in a series of 37 patients with shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder dislocation remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to assess the graft position and clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and capsular repair for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with significant glenoid bone loss in 37 patients. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2017, 37 patients underwent arthroscopic Latarjet plus capsular repair procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with significant glenoid bone loss. In follow-up examinations, Walch-Duplay scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, Rowe scores, and active range of motion (AROM) were assessed. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate coracoid graft position and bone resorption. A new method of evaluating the position of the coracoid bone block after Latarjet (H-Z method) was developed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in this study. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months postoperatively (with an average of 13 months). No recurrent dislocation occurred at the final follow-up, and there was no significant effect on the AROM (all p > 0.05). Rowe (from 42.2 ± 5.6 to 91.1 ± 3.3), Walch-Duplay (from 31.5 ± 8.0 to 92.6 ± 3.7), and SSV (from 63.9 ± 6.1 to 79.3% ± 5.0%) scores were improved significantly after surgery (all p < 0.001). CT showed that the 29 patients had varying degrees of bone resorption, and 23 recovered to the preinjury level of motional function within 6-12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In active patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations and significant glenoid bone loss, the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure plus capsular repair could restore shoulder stability satisfactory.

Self-reduction techniques taught via smartphone are effective for anterior shoulder dislocation: prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the effectiveness of three methods for self-assisted shoulder reduction demonstrated using a smartphone video link. BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder dislocation is very common among young adults. Patients often seek medical assistance in the emergency department to reduce their shoulder. Many techniques for shoulder reduction had been described, some of which do not require professional assistance and can be performed by patients themselves. METHODS: Patients admitted with anterior shoulder dislocation were randomized to either the Stimson, Milch or the Boss-Holtzach-Matter technique. Each patient was given a link to watch a short instructional video on his smartphone and instructed to attempt self-reduction. Success of the reduction, pain level, patient satisfaction and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 58 patients (mean age was 31.6 (18-66, median = 27), 82% males, 88% right hand dominant). Success rate using Boss-Holtzach-Matter (10 of 19, 53%) and self-assisted Milch (11 of 20, 55%) were significantly higher than with the self-assisted Stimson method (3 of 19, 16%), p < 0.05. Pain levels improved from 8.4 (2-10) to 3.1 (0-10) following the reduction. Patient subjective satisfaction from the reduction attempt was 6.7 (0-10). No complications were observed. CONCLUSION:  Both the Self-assisted Milch and the Boss-Holtzach-Matter techniques are ideal for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation without medical assistance. Both methods can be successfully performed without assistance or previous education and taught using an instructional video. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Off-track Hill-Sachs lesions predispose to recurrence after nonoperative management of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion has an impact on the recurrence rate after nonoperative management of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was planned with a follow-up via questionnaire after a minimum of 24 months. Fifty four patients were included in the study (mean age: 29.5 years; 16 female, 38 male). All of these patients opted for primary nonoperative management after first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, in some cases even against the clinician's advice. The glenoid track and the Hill-Sachs interval were evaluated in the MRI scans. The clinical outcome was evaluated via a shoulder-specific questionnaire, ASES-Score and Constant Score. Further, patients were asked to report on recurrent dislocation (yes/no), time to recurrent dislocation, pain, feeling of instability and satisfaction with nonoperative management. RESULTS: In 7 (13%) patients, an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion was present, while in 36 (67%) the lesion was on-track and 11 (20%) did not have a structural Hill-Sachs lesion at all. In total, 31 (57%) patients suffered recurrent dislocations. In the off-track group, all shoulders dislocated again (100%), while 21 (58%) in the on-track group and 3 (27%) in the no structural Hill--Sachs lesion group had a recurrent dislocation, p = 0.008. The mean age in the group with a recurrence was 23.7 ± 10.1 years, while those patients without recurrent dislocation were 37.4 ± 13.1 years old, p < 0.01. The risk for recurrence in patients under 30 years of age was higher than in those older than 30 years (OR = 12.66, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between patients with on- and off-track lesions regarding patients' sex, height, weight and time to reduction and glenoid diameter. Off-track patients were younger than on-track patients (24.9 ± 7.3 years vs. 29.6 ± 13.6 years). However, this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The presence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion leads to significantly higher recurrence rates compared to on-track or no structural Hill--Sachs lesions in patients with nonoperative management and should be considered when choosing the right treatment option. Therefore, surgical intervention should be considered in patients with off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a 24-year follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Different surgical techniques (open and arthroscopic) have been described for the treatment of post-traumatic recurrent anterior instability. The aim of the surgery is to restore when possible, normal shoulder anatomy by repairing the underlying pathology responsible for the instability. Sometimes other surgical techniques are indicated. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results and complications of the open Latarjet procedure after a minimum follow-up of 24 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for 67 patients treated with an open Latarjet procedure in a single center. Forty of these 67 patients returned for follow-up evaluation and clinical/radiological examination during the year 2018, having had a minimum of 24-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using two functional scores, in addition to the ROM and strength assessment. Radiographic evaluation included several views (AP views in neutral, internal and external rotation and a comparative Bernageau view) RESULTS: A total of 40 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure. All the patients were avaible for follow-up at an average of 25.6 years. Clinically, no patient reported any episode of dislocation at the time of follow-up. The mean Rowe score and the Walch-Duplay score were 84.5 (range 45-100) and 83.5 (range 55-100), respectively. Non-union/fibrous union was reported in 12.5% of cases, partial resorption of the graft was found in 7.5% of cases, while total resorption was found in 5% of cases. Osteoarthritis was identified in 52.5% (21) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term follow-up study demonstrated that the open Latarjet procedure is a safe and reliable technique for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The Latarjet procedure provides good long-term stability although associated with a slight limitation in external rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective cohort comparison; treatment study.

Anatomic healing after non-operative treatment of a large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fracture after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fractures after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation are usually managed by surgical stabilization. Although there is little evidence supporting surgical management, it is often preferred over non-operative treatment. This case report describes non-operative management of such large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fracture with CT- and MRI-based documentation of anatomical healing of the fracture fragment, a finding that has not been described previously. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes a 49-year-old male, right-hand dominant, carpenter, who had a left-sided primary anterior shoulder dislocation after a fall while skiing. Initial plain radiographs showed a reduced glenohumeral joint with a large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fracture. CT-evaluation showed a centered humeral head, and as per our institutional protocol, non-operative management was initiated. Longitudinal radiographic assessment at 2 weeks, 4.5 months and 12 months showed reduction of the initially severely displaced fracture fragment. MRI- and CT-evaluation after 12 months confirmed anatomical healing of the fragment. At final follow-up, the patient was highly satisfied, although the healing process was complicated by posttraumatic frozen shoulder, which has had almost fully resolved after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the glenohumeral joint is concentrically reduced, large (displaced) anterior glenoid rim fractures after traumatic primary shoulder dislocation can be successfully treated non-operatively, with the potential of anatomical fracture fragment healing. Therefore, it remains subject to conservative treatment at our institution and surgical stabilization is reserved for patients with a decentered humeral head or persistent glenohumeral instability.

Arthroscopic treatment of a one-fourth anteroinferior glenoid comminuted fracture-dislocation with concomitant three-part complex proximal humerus fracture in a middle-aged man: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations can occur in high-energy traumas. This injury can be accompanied by a glenoid fracture; however, it is a rare type of complex injury in patients aged under 60 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 53-year-old man presented with a three-part fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus and a severely comminuted glenoid fracture. For the glenohumeral dislocation and proximal humeral fracture, we performed closed reduction using a threaded Steinman pin and fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws. Using arthroscopy, while maintaining humeral traction with the Steinman pin, the intra-articular glenoid fragments were reduced and then fixed with a buttressing headless screw and one suture anchor. After a 6-week immobilization with a shoulder spica cast, rehabilitation was initiated. RESULTS: We confirmed bony union of the fracture sites after 6 months post-surgery. The patient showed excellent clinical outcomes with a nearly full range of motion without instability CONCLUSIONS: We reported a successful outcome for a complex proximal humeral fracture involving the glenoid using closed reduction and fixation for the proximal humeral fracture and arthroscopic reduction and fixation for the comminuted anteroinferior glenoid fracture.

Risk factors for anterior shoulder instability: a matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic skeletal features of the shoulder play important roles in anterior shoulder dislocation. However, studies on the effect of the humeral structure are few. This case-control study aimed to analyze the risk factors of anterior shoulder instability, including glenoid and humeral factors. METHODS: Anterior shoulder instability was found in 64 of 10,035 individuals who underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Propensity score matching was used to select controls matched for age, sex, height, and weight. We analyzed the glenoid and humeral structural data using conditional logistic regression analysis and identified cutoff points using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the control and dislocation groups in the depth-to-width ratio (0.119 ± 0.034 vs. 0.105 ± 0.037, P = .021), height-to-width ratio (1.51 ± 0.13 vs. 1.67 ± 0.16, P < .001), humeral head diameter-to-glenoid fossa diameter ratio (1.56 ± 0.11 vs. 1.64 ± 0.20, P < .001), and humeral containing angle (67.3° ± 5.9° vs. 60.4° ± 5.9°, P < .001). The humeral containing angle (odds ratio, 0.95; P = .024) and the glenoid height-to-width ratio (odds ratio, 7.88; P = .002), adjusted for the depth-to-width ratio and diameter ratio, were associated with anterior shoulder instability. The cutoff point for the humeral containing angle was 64° and for the height-to-width ratio was 1.60. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant risk factors for shoulder instability in the Chinese Han population. The humeral containing angle and the glenoid height-to-width ratio were risk factors for anterior shoulder instability.

FARES method for reduction without medication of first episode of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficiency of (FARES) method for reduction of first-episode anterior shoulder dislocation, as well as its safety, reliability, and quick easy reproducibility by inexperienced physicians without any use of medications. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 28 patients with first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation that underwent closed reduction using FARES method by junior orthopaedic residents without use of any analgesic, muscle relaxant, or anesthesia. Only two attempts of reduction were allowed for each patient. The time needed for reduction was recorded, and the patients were asked to grade their pain according to a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: Reduction was achieved after one attempt in 21 patients (75%) and after two attempts in three additional patients (total 85.7%). The mean time needed for reduction was 62.66 seconds, and the mean visual analog scale for pain evaluation was 5.29. CONCLUSION: FARES method is a fast, reliable, and safe method for reduction of a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation and can be easily performed by inexperienced physicians and junior residents.

Early surgical treatment of first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation in a young, active population is superior to conservative management at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term effectiveness of non-operative treatment with immediate arthroscopic surgical stabilization in young, active patients after first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 15-25 years who suffered primary traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation were enrolled in this prospective, non-randomized investigation. In total, 160 patients were enrolled-64 opted for surgical stabilization (group A), while 96 opted for conservative treatment (group B). At final follow-up of over 6.5 years, 60 patients in group A (96.7% males, age 22.8 ± 3.2) and 70 patients in group B (90.0% males, age 20.8 ± 2.9) were evaluated with physical examination, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and radiological studies. Recurrence and return to sport (RTS) data were collected, and variables were compared between groups. RESULTS: Recurrence rate in group A was 13.3% at mean latency of 3.3 ± 1.9 years, compared to 71.4% at mean latency of 2.1 ± 1.5 years in group B (P < 0.001 for both recurrence rate and latency). In group A, 70.0% of patients RTS at the pre-injury level, versus 41.4% of patients in group B (P < 0.001). Patients in group A scored significantly higher on all PROMs (all P < 0.001) and had significantly less osteoarthritis (P = 0.004), when compared to group B. CONCLUSION: Acute surgical stabilization of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in young, active patients is more effective than conservative treatment at long-term follow up, based on lower recurrence rate, better RTS, and higher patient-perceived improvement.

Glenoid and rotator interval dimension in patients older than 40 years after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.

INTRODUCTION: The number of patients above 40 years suffering an anterior shoulder dislocation for the first time has recently increased. This study investigated the role of glenoid version, inclination and rotator interval dimension in patients older than 40 years with an anterior shoulder dislocation. We hypothesize that the rotator interval plays a more important role than the osseus alignment in older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged older than 40 years with a traumatic shoulder dislocation were compared with patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for a different reason. The MRIs of 61 dislocation group patients were compared with MRIs of 73 comparison group patients. Two shoulder surgeons measured glenoid version, inclination, height and width, rotator interval (RI) height, base (width) and area. The study and comparison group consisted of 61 patients with a mean age of 59 ± 9 years and 73 patients with a mean age of 57 ± 12, respectively. RESULTS: The mean glenoid version of the dislocation group was - 4.9° ± 4.4° (retroversion) and mean inclination was 9.8° ± 8° (reclination). Mean rotator interval base, height and the rotator interval area was 46 ± 6 mm, 14 ± 5 mm and 33 ± 14 mm2, respectively. The comparison group had a mean glenoid version of - 5.4° ± 5.4° and a mean inclination of 10.8° ± 6.2°. The rotator interval base was 41 ± 6 mm, the height was 16 ± 4 mm and the area was 34 ± 11 mm2. The between-group differences were statistically significant for rotator interval height and base (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was revealed for the height-width ratio of the glenoid (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients older than 40 years who have suffered anterior shoulder dislocation, the shape of the glenoid rather than its spatial position is of significance. A wide and high rotator interval promotes anterior shoulder dislocation in these patients.

Selective Prereduction Radiography in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: The Fresno-Quebec Rule.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder dislocation is one of the most frequent dislocations encountered by emergency physicians. Typical emergency care usually includes performing both prereduction and postreduction radiography. However, selective radiography has the potential benefits of reducing emergency department (ED) time and radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: To refine and combine two existing clinical decision rules for selective radiography in the ED management of anterior shoulder dislocation, thus creating the Fresno-Quebec rule (FQR). METHODS: Patients presenting to the ED with an anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in a prospective cohort study in two university-affiliated EDs. Patients with a clinically important fracture-dislocation were compared with those with an uncomplicated dislocation. We refined our new decision rule to detect all fracture-dislocations while maximizing specificity. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included in this study, of which 24 (11.8%) had a clinically important fracture-dislocation. The refined rule consisting of three criteria had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.5-100%), specificity of 50% (95% CI 42.5-57.5%), negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 96-100%), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.21 (95% CI 0.14-0.30). No patient with an atraumatic, recurrent dislocation had a fracture. Patients over age 35 years had an increased risk of fracture-dislocation if they sustained blunt injury or had a first episode of dislocation. Using this rule could have reduced prereduction radiographs by 44%. CONCLUSION: The refined Fresno-Quebec shoulder dislocation rule detected all clinically important prereduction fracture-dislocations and could have reduced prereduction films by 44%. Prospective validation is warranted.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of acute anterior shoulder dislocation remains one of the topics that spark debate over the value of primary repair for the first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. The high rate of complications especially in young adults, such as recurrent instability, residual pain, and inability to return to sports, has led to the quest for an ideal management of such injuries. OBJECTIVE: In this meta-analysis, we compare between the immediate arthroscopic repair and conservative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation as well as arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Outcome measures were failure rate (dislocation, subluxation, and instability) and revision rates. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched several database including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2017 to identify observational and experimental randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of immediate arthroscopic repair and conservative treatment of primary shoulder dislocations as well as arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation. The primary outcome was failure rate, whereas, secondary outcomes were revision rate and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 710 studies identified, 12 were eligible for meta-analysis. The estimated pooled failure rate was 13.7% (7.7%-19.6%), whereas, the pooled revision rate was 7.1% (3.8%-10.4%) in immediate arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation. The odd ratio (OR) of failure and revision rates were significantly lower in arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation compared to conservative treatment (OR 0.103, 95% CI [0.052, 0.201]), (OR 0.217, 95% CI [0.078, 0.607]), respectively. The odd ratio (OD) of failure and revision rates were lower in arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of the recurrent shoulder dislocation; however, the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 0.423, 95% CI [0.117, 1.522]) and (OR 0.358, 95% CI [0.044, 2.920]) respectively. CONCLUSION: The outcome of immediate arthroscopic repair of primary anterior shoulder dislocation is superior and encouraging with significant reduction in failure and revision rates compared to conservative treatment. Nevertheless, the failure and revision rates are statistically insignificant compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation. Hence, there is evidence to support immediate arthroscopic repair option for primary anterior shoulder dislocations over conservative treatment in young active patients, in order to reduce the risk of failure and revision rates. However, the evidence is inconclusive compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation.

Open versus arthroscopic surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis over the past 20 years.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing open and arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability by analyzing comparative studies during 2 different time intervals during the last 20 years. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Two groups were created by dividing studies according to the year of publication, those published from 1995 to 2004 or from 2005 to 2015. Publication bias and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies (n = 1633) met the eligibility criteria. Comparison of the pooled estimate for all of these studies demonstrated no significant differences (P = .64) in clinical outcomes between open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. However, studies published from 1995 through 2004 demonstrated significant differences (P = .015) in recurrence rates favoring open surgery. In contrast, no significant differences (P = .09) in recurrence rates were observed for studies published from 2005 through 2015. The pooled estimate for all studies in both groups demonstrated significant differences (P = .001) in external rotation deficits between open and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization favoring arthroscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite advances in surgical techniques and devices during the last 20 years, either open or arthroscopic surgical treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation results in similar clinical outcomes. The recurrence rate for arthroscopic surgical stabilization has only marginally decreased, from 16.8% to 14.2%. However, during the earlier decade from 1995 through 2004, patients treated with arthroscopic surgery had twice the risk of recurrence compared with an open procedure.

The "triple dislocation fracture": anterior shoulder dislocation with concomitant fracture of the glenoid rim, greater tuberosity and coracoid process-a series of six cases.

BACKGROUND: A combined fracture of the glenoid rim, greater tuberosity, and coracoid process after anterior shoulder dislocation is a rare event. Only 1 patient has been reported in the literature. METHODS: All patients with a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in a level A trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 2068 patients treated between 1998 and 2013, we identified 6 patients (0.3%; 1 female, 5 male) with "triple dislocation fracture" (anterior shoulder dislocation with concomitant fracture of the glenoid rim, greater tuberosity, and coracoid process). All patients underwent surgery and had computed tomography scans before surgery and the first postoperative day. Mean follow-up time was 59 months. Clinical and radiographic evaluation, Constant-Murley Score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Subjective Shoulder Value were performed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Surgery was determined individually according to the radiologic findings, patient's age, and personal demands. Glenoid reconstruction was performed in all 6 patients, greater tuberosity refixation in 4 patients, and coracoid process refixation in 3. Two patients needed revision surgery due to loss of reduction. At the final follow-up, mean abduction was 133°, mean anterior flexion was 138°; the mean Constant-Murley Score was 72 points; the mean Simple Shoulder Test was 9 points; and the mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 72%. No recurrent instability occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A "triple dislocation fracture," especially coracoid process fractures, can easily be overlooked in radiographs. Computed tomography scans are strongly recommended in patients with a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation. Because recurrent joint instability and secondary arthropathy are serious complications after anterior shoulder dislocation, surgery should be considered and provides satisfying to excellent results.