Risk Stratification for Supratherapeutic Peak Anti-Xa Levels in Adult Patients on Therapeutic Enoxaparin.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Hematology Guidelines for the management of venous thromboembolism recommend against the use of anti-Xa monitoring for assessing enoxaparin dosing based on a low level of evidence associating supratherapeutic levels with an increased risk of bleeding. However, institutions still utilize anti-Xa levels in select patient populations with altered volume of distribution and/or excretion to monitor and adjust therapy. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with supratherapeutic peak anti-Xa levels (≥1.10 IU/mL) for patients receiving therapeutic enoxaparin. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study performed at an academic tertiary care hospital. Patients who received enoxaparin at 1 mg/kg twice daily and peak anti-Xa monitoring were separated into supratherapeutic and therapeutic/subtherapeutic cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 436 patients were screened, and 215 were included, with a mean age of 62 years. There were 108 in the therapeutic/subtherapeutic cohort and 107 in the supratherapeutic cohort. Acute kidney injury (AKI), body mass index (BMI), weight, female sex, intensive care unit (ICU) service, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥4, and creatinine clearance at the time of peak anti-Xa level collection were associated with supratherapeutic anti-Xa levels in univariate models. Adjusted logistic regression models were created and identified BMI in the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-11.13, P < 0.005) and ≥35 kg/m2 (OR 6.75; 95% CI 3.05-14.94, P < 0.005) and AKI (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.04-6.62, P = 0.042) as significant risk factors for supratherapeutic anti-Xa levels. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our study identified BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, AKI, female sex, ICU service, SOFA score ≥4, and creatinine clearance as risk factors for supratherapeutic anti-Xa levels in patients receiving 1 mg/kg twice daily dosing of enoxaparin. Further research should be done to provide evidence for the association between anti-Xa levels and bleeding risk.

Comparison of the Correlation Between Coagulation Indices and Rivaroxaban Concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban has predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, monitoring rivaroxaban concentrations should be provided for special patients with hepatic insufficiency, high bleeding risk, and high thrombotic risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to correlate chromogenic anti-Xa assay, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thromboelastogram reaction time (TEG R-time), and rivaroxaban concentration measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) (MS-Riva). METHODS: Peripheral venous blood was collected from recruited patients 30 minutes before and 2 to 4 hours after drug administration. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and chromogenic anti-Xa assay measured rivaroxaban concentration. Different assays were compared by Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients with 191 plasma were included in the study. Overall analysis shows that chromogenic anti-Xa assay, PT, APTT, and TEG R-time strongly correlated with MS-Riva (r = 0.986; r = 0.884; r = 0.741; r = 0.739; P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban peak concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-peak) showed a very strong correlation with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (r = 0.977, P < 0.001) and moderate correlation with PT, APTT, and TEG R-time (r = 0.670; r = 0.571; r = 0.481, P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban trough concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-trough) correlated strongly with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (r = 0.884, P < 0.001), weakly with APTT (r = 0.313; P = 0.043), and not significantly with PT and TEG R-time (P = 0.140; P = 0.341). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry/MS is the preferred choice for monitoring peak and tough concentrations, followed by anti-Xa, while PT is only suitable for peak concentrations. This study can help the clinicians to better adjust the medication regimen and reduce the risk of recurrence of thrombosis as well as the risk of bleeding.

Anti-Xa-guided Anticoagulation With Unfractionated Heparin and Thrombosis During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) triggers complex coagulation processes necessitating systemic anticoagulation. Therefore, anticoagulation monitoring is crucial to avoid adverse events such as thrombosis and hemorrhage. The main aim of this work was to analyze the association between anti-Xa levels and thrombosis occurrence during ECMO support. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis (Scopus and PubMed, up to July 29, 2023). SETTING: All retrospective and prospective studies. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving ECMO support. INTERVENTION: Anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 16 articles with 1,968 patients were included in the review and 7 studies in the meta-analysis (n = 374). Patients with thrombosis had significantly lower mean anti-Xa values (standardized mean difference -0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.62 to -0.11, p < 0.01). Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between unfractionated heparin infusion and anti-Xa levels (pooled estimate of correlation coefficients 0.31, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.43, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were major bleeding (42%) and any kind of hemorrhage (36%), followed by thromboembolic events (30%) and circuit or oxygenator membrane thrombosis (19%). More than half of the patients did not survive to discharge (52%). CONCLUSIONS: This work revealed significantly lower levels of anti-Xa in patients experiencing thromboembolic events and a positive correlation between anti-Xa and unfractionated heparin infusion. Considering the contemplative limitations of conventional monitoring tools, further research on the role of anti-Xa is warranted. New trials should be encouraged to confirm these findings and determine the most suitable monitoring strategy for patients receiving ECMO support.

Impact of C-reactive Protein on Anticoagulation Monitoring in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of inflammation on anticoagulation monitoring for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Prospective single-center cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult venovenous and venoarterial ECMO patients anticoagulated with heparin/ MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: C-Reactive protein (CRP) was used as a surrogate for overall inflammation. The relationship between CRP and the partial thromboplastin time (PTT, seconds) was evaluated using a CRP-insensitive PTT assay (PTT-CRP) in addition to measurement using a routine PTT assay. Data from 30 patients anticoagulated with heparin over 371 ECMO days was included. CRP levels (mg/dL) were significantly elevated (median, 17.2; interquartile range [IQR], 9.2-26.1) and 93% of patients had a CRP of ≥5. The median PTT (median 58.9; IQR, 46.9-73.3) was prolonged by 11.3 seconds compared with simultaneously measured PTT-CRP (median, 47.6; IQR, 40.1-55.5; p < 0.001). The difference between PTT and PTT-CRP generally increased with CRP elevation from 2.7 for a CRP of <5.0 to 13.0 for a CRP between 5 and 10, 17.7 for a CRP between 10 and 15, and 15.1 for a CRP of >15 (p < 0.001). In a subgroup of patients, heparin was transitioned to argatroban, and a similar effect was observed (median PTT, 62.1 seconds [IQR, 53.0-78.5 seconds] vs median PTT-CRP, 47.6 seconds [IQR, 41.3-57.7 seconds]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevations in CRP are common during ECMO and can falsely prolong PTT measured by commonly used assays. The discrepancy due to CRP-interference is important clinically given narrow PTT targets and may contribute to hematological complications.

A retrospective study of the management and outcomes of pregnancies with inherited antithrombin deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Antithrombin (AT) deficiency is a rare but highly thrombogenic inherited thrombophilia. Its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) is undefined. There is limited guidance on managing AT deficiency in pregnancy. Some significant issues remain controversial, including risk assessment for prophylactic anticoagulation, anticoagulant therapy, and monitoring. Our goal was to examine if the antepartum management of patients with AT deficiency affected their pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center observational study included pregnant women with inherited AT deficiency in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2013 and 2024. RESULTS: Seventeen pregnancies in 6 women with AT deficiency were identified. A total of 7 pregnancies received adjusted-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and were monitored by anti-Xa level, AT activity, and D-dimer. There were 5 live births (all received LMWH), 7 second-trimester abortions (1 received LMWH), and 5 early pregnancy losses (1 received LMWH). There were 5 abruptio placentae events (3 received LMWH) and 7 thrombotic events (2 received LMWH). CONCLUSIONS: AT deficiency is at least an important partial factor contributing to APO. It is suggested to make a full assessment of AT patients both for venous thrombus embolism and APO risk. We observed a high prevalence of heparin resistance and a positive correlation between adequate anticoagulation and pregnancy outcome based on tight monitoring with anti-Xa level and timely adjustment of the LMWH dosage.

Evaluating the Use of Unfractionated Heparin with Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to prevent limb ischaemia remains limited, while bleeding risks remain high. Monitoring heparin in this setting with anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) is not previously described. OBJECTIVES: The study objective is to describe the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events with the use of UFH in patients with an IABP utilising monitoring with both anti-Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adults who received an IABP and UFH for ≥24 hours. Electronic medical records were reviewed for pertinent data. The primary outcome was the incidence of limb ischaemia during IABP. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, thrombus on IABP, or stroke. Exploratory outcomes included any venous thromboembolism and bleeding events. RESULTS: Of 159 patients, 88% received an IABP for cardiogenic shock and median duration of IABP support was 118 hours (interquartile range, 67-196). Limb ischaemia occurred in four of 159 patients (2.5%). Strokes occurred in 3.8% of the cohort, and bleeding events occurred in 33%. Despite anticoagulation use in all patients, 11% experienced a venous thromboembolism, with most identified upon asymptomatic screening with concern for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We found no differences in outcomes that occurred with a hybrid anti-Xa and aPTT versus aPTT monitoring alone. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high rate of thrombotic and bleeding complications with the use of UFH in patients with an IABP. Use of anti-Xa versus aPTT for monitoring was not associated with complications. These data suggest safer anticoagulation strategies are needed in this setting.

Effects of anti-Xa activity monitoring on the outcome of high-risk pregnancies treated with a prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if anti-Xa level monitoring and dose adjustment in women using a prophylactic dose of enoxaparin can decrease placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study included pregnant women receiving enoxaparin prophylaxis, who were followed at the Thrombosis and Hemostasis Outpatient clinic between 2010 and 2017. The dose was adjusted according to enoxaparin anti-Xa levels in the study group or the weight of individuals in the control group. RESULTS: Of 585 women surveyed, 110 met the inclusion criteria; 63 of them were included in the study group and 47 in the control group. Mean starting dose was 46 versus 43 mg (p = .25), mean final dose was 52 mg versus 45 mg (p = .03) and dose adjustment was required in 37% versus 11% (p = .002) in the study and control groups, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of anti-Xa measurements in the second trimester were beneath the prophylactic threshold, compared to 11% and 16% in the first and third trimesters, respectively (p = .02). Labors ended with live birth in 91% versus 94% of cases (p = .5), 85% versus 68% of pregnancies were term (p = .05), 11% versus 23% of newborns were low birth weight (p = .1) and placenta-mediated pregnancy complications were documented in 9% versus 19%, (p = .17) in the study group relative to controls, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most prominent decrease in anti-Xa levels was observed in the second trimester. Monitored women had significantly more term deliveries and demonstrated a trend toward higher birth weight and fewer placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm improved pregnancy outcome in monitored women.

The effect of renal impairment and obesity on anti-Xa peak and trough levels in patients receiving therapeutic doses of nadroparin: a comparison with control patients.

PURPOSE: Anti-Xa peak level monitoring is recommended during LMWH treatment in renal impairment or obesity. The trough level has been proposed as marker for bleeding. We studied the influence of renal impairment and obesity on anti-Xa levels. METHODS: Peak and trough levels were collected during therapeutic nadroparin treatment in patients with renal impairment, obese patients, and controls. 27 patients (n = 68 samples) were evaluated and combined with published data (n = 319 samples from 35 patients) using population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modelling. RESULTS: Median peak level was 0.44 and 0.95 IU/mL in renal impairment with and without dose reduction and 0.60 and 0.43 IU/mL in obesity and controls, respectively. Trough levels were < 0.5 IU/mL in all patients with renal impairment with dose reduction and in 5/6 control patients. In the popPK model, total body weight and eGFR were covariates for clearance and lean body weight for distribution volume. Model-based evaluations demonstrated peak levels below the therapeutic window in controls and increased levels in renal impairment. Dose reductions resulted in a different effect on peak and trough levels. Obese patients (BMI up to 32 kg/m2) had similar levels upon weight-based dosing. CONCLUSION: In renal impairment, anti-Xa peak levels after dose reduction are comparable to those in controls. Weight-based dosing is suitable for obese patients. Aiming for peak levels between 0.6 and 1.0 IU/mL in these patients would result in overexposure compared to controls. Considering the association of trough levels and bleeding risk and our findings, trough monitoring seems to be a suitable parameter to identify nadroparin accumulation.

Effects of dalteparin on anti-Xa activities cannot be predicted in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at high risk of thromboembolic events despite routine-dosed low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis. However, in recent randomized trials increased-intensity thromboprophylaxis seemed futile and possibly even harmful. In this explorative pharmacokinetic (PK) study we measured anti-Xa activities on frequent timepoints in 15 critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving dalteparin and performed PK analysis by nonlinear mixed-effect modelling. A linear one-compartment model with first-order kinetics provided a good fit. However, wide interindividual variation in dalteparin absorption (variance 78%) and clearance (variance 34%) was observed, unexplained by routine clinical covariates. Using the final PK model for Monte Carlo simulations, we predicted increased-intensity dalteparin to result in anti-Xa activities well over prophylactic targets (0.2-0.4 IU/mL) in the majority of patients. Therapeutic-intensity dalteparin results in supratherapeutic anti-Xa levels (target 0.6-1.0 IU/mL) in 19% of patients and subtherapeutic levels in 22%. Therefore, anti-Xa measurements should guide high-intensity dalteparin in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Observed Apixaban Anti-Xa Levels in Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines suggest that, for venous thromboembolism (VTE), standard doses of apixaban are appropriate in patients with body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 or >120 kg. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is excluded from this recommendation. OBJECTIVE: The goals of our study were to measure and describe anti-Xa levels of patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or a weight ≥120 kg with a clinical indication of AF or VTE who were treated with apixaban, and to determine whether BMI or weight are associated with anti-Xa levels in this population. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study at a single health care system in Oregon, USA. Patients meeting enrollment criteria were recruited and had peak and trough apixaban anti-Xa levels drawn. RESULTS: Of 55 patients enrolled, 5 (9%) had peak anti-Xa levels below the reference range and 3 (6%) had trough anti-Xa levels below the reference range. BMI did not significantly correlate with peak or trough anti-Xa levels (r = -0.10, p = 0.45 and r = -0.14, p = 0.31). Weight had a moderate, negative correlation with peak anti-Xa levels (r = -0.42, p = 0.002) and a weak, negative correlation with trough anti-Xa levels (r = -0.32, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study provides evidence that anti-Xa levels among obese patients are not substantially different from patients with nomral BMI and weight. This supports recent ISTH guidance for standard dosing of apixaban for VTE patients with BMI >40 kg/m2 or weight >120 kg and provides additional evidence that the standard dosing may also be appropriate in patients with AF.

Comparison of Managing Factor Xa Inhibitor to Unfractionated Heparin Transitions by aPTT Versus a Treatment Guideline Utilizing Heparin Anti-Xa Levels.

BACKGROUND: There are inadequate data on the optimal strategy for transitioning factor Xa inhibitors (FXai; apixaban, rivaroxaban) to unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions. OBJECTIVE: In patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion, this study compared the safety and efficacy of monitoring UFH infusions using an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) titration scale versus utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa titration scale aided by a novel institutional guideline. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion at 2 medical centers from June 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020. One institution utilized aPTT while the other institution primarily used UFH-calibrated anti-Xa. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, major bleeding, or new thrombosis during the hospitalization with a planned noninferiority analysis. Secondary outcomes were also collected including the amount and duration of UFH administered between cohorts. RESULTS: The incidence rate of the primary composite endpoint was 6.3% in the anti-Xa group and 11% in the aPTT group (P < 0.001 for noninferiority, P = 0.138 for superiority) meeting noninferiority criteria. No statistical differences were seen in new thrombosis, major bleeding, or any bleeding. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This represents the first report of a comparison between aPTT versus anti-Xa monitoring in relation to clinical outcomes for patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion. A transition guideline primarily utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa assay appears to be a safe alternative to aPTT monitoring and can aid facilities in the management of patients during these complex transitions.

Plasma levels of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients at the time of embolic stroke: a pilot prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) with low anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels may be at higher risk of recurrent stroke. However, no prospective post-marketing study has investigated these DOAC plasma levels at the time of embolic stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the anti-Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and anti-IIa (dabigatran) plasma levels in DOAC-treated AF patients at the time of acute embolic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively identified 43 patients with AF on long-term DOAC who experienced embolic strokes. We compared the DOAC plasma levels of these patients with a control sample of 57 patients who tolerated long-term therapeutic dose DOAC therapy without any adverse event. DOAC levels were assessed with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). RESULTS: Dabigatran-treated patients with stroke had significantly lower anti-IIa levels when compared with the trough (40.7 ± 36.9 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and peak samples of the controls (40.7 ± 36.9 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Similarly, there were significantly lower anti-Xa levels in apixaban-treated patients with stroke compared to the trough control samples (72.4 ± 46.7 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, p < 0.05), and in rivaroxaban- and apixaban-treated patients when compared to peak control samples (rivaroxaban: 42.7 ± 31.9 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, p < 0.001; apixaban: 72.4 ± 46.7 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This observational study showed significantly lower anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in AF patients with embolic stroke compared to those who tolerated long-term therapeutic dose DOAC therapy.

Apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-Xa level utilization for guidance of administration of andexanet alfa: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa, a modified recombinant factor Xa (FXa), was FDA approved in 2018 for anticoagulant reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding associated with FXa inhibitors (FXaI). The ANNEXA-4 investigators administered andexanet alfa to patients within an 18-h from last dose of oral FXaI. In practice, time from last dose is often unknown. Previous studies have shown that clearance of these agents may be impaired by renal and hepatic dysfunction, as well as drug-drug interactions. Decision for use of andexanet alfa is also complicated by its high cost, limited drug availability, and thrombotic risk. This study aimed to describe the utility of anti-Xa DOAC levels as a decision point to administer andexanet alfa. METHODS: This is a case series of four patients with an anti-Xa DOAC level that received andexanet alfa for oral FXaI reversal in the setting of life-threatening bleeding or prior to procedure. RESULTS: Four patients were included in the study. Two patients had a known time since last dose of oral FXaI. All patients had a detectable anti-Xa DOAC levels prior to administration of andexanet alfa. Two patients had levels within the peak range, one patient had a level below the peak range, and one patient had a level above the peak range. Andexanet alfa was administered after anti-Xa DOAC level return in all patients. CONCLUSION: In our case series, obtaining anti-Xa DOAC levels prior to administration of andexanet alfa was achievable and facilitated use of reversal agents in patients with major bleeding or emergent procedural need.

Anti-factor X activity levels with continuous intravenous infusion and subcutaneous administration of enoxaparin after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin is widely used in pharmacological thromboprophylaxis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to compare anti-factor X activity (anti-Xa) levels when the thromboprophylactic dose of enoxaparin was provided after CABG, with two different administration routes: continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) and subcutaneous bolus (SCB) injection. We hypothesized that the current standard method of SCB administration might lead to lower anti-Xa levels than recommended in other patient groups, due to reduced bioavailability. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 40 patients scheduled for elective CABG were randomized to receive 40 mg of enoxaparin per day either as CIV or SCB for 72 h. Enoxaparin was initiated 6-10 h after CABG. Anti-Xa levels were measured 12-14 times during the study period. The primary outcome, that is, the maximum anti-Xa concentration over 0-24 h (Cmax0-24h ), was calculated from these measured values. Secondary outcomes were Cmax25-72h and the trough concentration of anti-Xa after 72 h of enoxaparin initiation (C72h ). RESULTS: Twenty patients were randomized to the CIV-group and 19 to the SCB-group. The median anti-Xa Cmax0-24h was significantly lower in the CIV-group than in the SCB-group: 0.15 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.13-0.19] IU/ml versus 0.25 (IQR 0.18-0.32) IU/ml, p < .005. The median anti-Xa Cmax25-72h was 0.12 (IQR, 0.1-0.17) IU/ml versus 0.23 (IQR 0.19-0.31) IU/ml, respectively, p < .005. At 72 h, there was no difference between the groups in their anti-Xa levels. CONCLUSIONS: In this low-risk CABG patient population, SCB administration of a thromboprophylactic dose of enoxaparin provided anti-Xa levels that are considered sufficient for thromboprophylaxis in other patient groups. CIV administration resulted in lower anti-Xa levels compared to the SCB route.

Conventional versus restricted anti-Xa-guided heparin protocol in adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal intensity of anticoagulation for adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two anticoagulation protocols using conventional (0.3-0.7 IU/ml) versus restricted (0.2-0.5 IU/ml) anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) targets for the management of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in adult ECMO patients. METHODS: This retrospective before-after cohort study compared two groups of ECMO patients who received UFH for at least 24-h from March 2016 to May 2019. The primary outcome was the composite rate of major bleeding or thrombotic events per ECMO day. Secondary outcomes included the mean amount of blood products transfused per ECMO day, the proportion of patients who were within the target anti-Xa at 24-h, the time to achieve target anti-Xa, and the number of heparin infusion adjustments to reach target anti-Xa. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included in this analysis (conventional, n = 25; restricted, n = 16). There was no difference in the composite rate of major bleeding or thrombotic events per ECMO day (p = .090). The restricted group had lower rates of packed red blood cells (pRBC) transfusion per ECMO day (mean 1 ± 1 vs 3 ± 2 units, p = .003) and required fewer heparin infusion adjustments to reach the target (p = .007). There was no difference between the groups in the number of patients who achieved target anti-Xa at 24-h (p = .940). CONCLUSION: In adult ECMO patients, anticoagulation with a restricted anti-Xa target was associated with lower pRBC transfusions and did not provoke an excess of thrombotic events.

The value and limitations of new oral anticoagulant plasma level assessments.

The class of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been developed to provide reliable oral anticoagulation without the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Based on phase I and II trials and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, fixed drug doses have been selected for large phase III clinical trials for each currently available NOAC. In these trials, the use of the fixed dose without plasma level assessments was shown to be at least as effective and at least as safe as vitamin K antagonists with continuous therapeutic drug monitoring. Real world evidence reaffirms that the use of a fixed NOAC dose without plasma level assessment is safe and effective in a large variety of patients. Nevertheless, measurement of NOAC plasma levels can add information that may be useful in some clinical scenarios. This review discusses the possible use cases, the limitations, and the practical implementation of measuring NOAC plasma concentrations.

Assessment of Anti-Xa activity in patients receiving concomitant apixaban with strong p-glycoprotein inhibitors and statins.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Although the apixaban Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert recommends dose reduction in patients administered dual strong inhibitors of p-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4, there are limited published data regarding potential drug-drug interactions between apixaban (Eliquis) and common p-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 inhibitors co-administered with statins. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of elevation relative to apixaban serum peak and trough concentration after the co-administration of amiodarone, diltiazem and statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin). METHODS: Patients prescribed apixaban 5mg twice daily for at least one week were identified from the anticoagulation clinic database and contacted for potential enrolment. A total of 117 volunteers were enrolled with eight excluded due to discontinued use, resulting in 109 volunteers (44 females and 65 males delineated into age groups 40-64 and ≥65 years old) completing the observational study. Fifty-five volunteers were administered apixaban without the P-gp inhibitors amiodarone or diltiazem, with or without statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin). Fifty-four volunteers were administered apixaban with either amiodarone or diltiazem, with or without statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin or simvastatin). Peak and trough concentrations were assessed for each patient utilizing an apixaban anti-Xa assay. RESULTS: Of the combinations studied, the mean apixaban trough concentration upon co-administration of amiodarone without a statin was elevated compared to apixaban alone (experimental 156.83 +/- 79.59 ng/ml vs. control 104.09 +/- 44.56 ng/ml; p = 0.04). The co-administration of diltiazem and rosuvastatin, and the administration of amiodarone without a statin led to greater than 1.5-fold increase in apixaban concentrations (peak experimental 315.19 +/- 157.53 ng/ml vs control 207.6 +/- 83.38 ng/ml; p = 0.08 and trough experimental 182.03 +/- 95.93 ng/ml vs control 112.32 +/- 37.78 ng/ml; p = 0.17) suggesting the need to assess dose adjustment for patients per the FDA package insert. In addition, the aggregated mean peak (p = 0.0056) and trough (p = 0.0089) elevation of CYP3A4 experimental groups (atorvastatin and simvastatin) co-administered apixaban and diltiazem were statistically significant compared with the aggregated non-CYP3A4 control groups (no statin and rosuvastatin). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Herein, we report novel data regarding peak and trough apixaban concentrations after concomitant administration of P-gp and CYP3A4 inhibitors (amiodarone or diltiazem) co-administered with statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin or simvastatin). Providers should consider utilizing the apixaban anti-Xa assay or comparative heparin anti-Xa assay to determine if patients require dose reduction to decrease adverse events in high-risk patients prescribed apixaban and concomitant p-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibitors amiodarone or diltiazem with and without a CYP3A4 or non-3A4 statin.

A Weight- and Anti-Xa-Guided Enoxaparin Dosing Protocol for venous thromboembolism Prophylaxis in intensive care unit Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the optimal dosing strategy for prophylactic enoxaparin remains unknown. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate a weight-based and anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dosing protocol in intensive care unit (ICU) trauma patients and to determine if the protocol led to reduced clinical VTE rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted for ≥ 48 hours to our surgical or neurosurgical ICUs who received ≥ 3 consecutive weight-based enoxaparin doses were eligible for inclusion into this pre-post implementation cohort study. Enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours was used for weight 50 to 100 kg and body mass index (BMI) < 40 kg/m2 and enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours for weight ≥ 100 kg or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. PRE cohort patients did not routinely receive anti-Xa level monitoring, while in the POST cohort, dosing was subsequently titrated to peak anti-Xa levels of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL. RESULTS: A total of 110 and 113 patients were included in the PRE and POST cohorts, respectively. Clinical VTE rates were similar between groups. In the POST cohort, 75% of patients achieved goal anti-Xa levels without dose titrations, while 12% of higher weight patients and 9.1% of lower weight patients required adjustment. When comparing weight quartiles, patients > 100 kg were more likely to have sub-prophylactic anti-Xa levels than those ≤ 69 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Our enoxaparin dosing protocol was safe and frequently achieved initial anti-Xa levels within goal, indicating that weight-based dosing alone may be sufficient. However, patients > 100 kg may benefit from anti-Xa monitoring as they are highest risk for sub-prophylactic levels despite higher initial enoxaparin dosing.

Impact of Weight on Anti-Xa Attainment in High-Risk Trauma Patients on Enoxaparin Chemoprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Serum anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) concentration may guide low molecular weight heparin chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients. Higher total body weight (TBW) is a risk factor for subprophylactic anti-Xa and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate TBW differences in patients with subprophylactic versus prophylactic trough anti-Xa. METHODS: This retrospective study included adults admitted to the trauma service who received enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis, trough anti-Xa assessment, and screening duplex ultrasound. Initial enoxaparin dose was determined per trauma team weight-tiered protocol with subsequent 10 mg increase if anti-Xa was subprophylactic. Patients were stratified into subprophylactic (anti-Xa <0.1 IU/ml) and prophylactic (anti-Xa ≥0.1 IU/mL) groups. The primary outcome was difference in TBW. Secondary outcomes were weight-adjusted enoxaparin dose (mg/kg), VTE, red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions. RESULTS: A total of 887 patients were included with 681 (76.8%) having subprophylactic anti-Xa. The subprophylactic group had significantly younger age, higher proportion male sex, higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), higher BMI, and longer length of hospital stay. The subprophylactic group had higher TBW (median [IQR], 87.8 [74-102] kg vs. 78.9 [68-91.8] kg; P < 0.001) which equated to a lower weight-adjusted dose (0.34 [0.3-0.41] mg/kg vs. 0.38 (0.33-0.44) mg/kg; P < 0.001). There were no differences in VTE (10.4% vs. 9.2%; P = 0.71) or pRBC administration (17.0% vs. 16.0%; P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: TBW is higher and weight-adjusted enoxaparin dose is lower in high-risk trauma patients with subprophylactic anti-Xa concentrations. These data suggest TBW should be considered when determining the optimal prophylactic enoxaparin dose in high-risk trauma patients.

Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism Treatment With Anti-Xa Versus Weight-Based Enoxaparin: A Retrospective Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication of cancer, for which low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) remains the preferred anticoagulant. Enoxaparin is traditionally dosed using weight. In certain populations, monitoring anti-Xa levels for therapeutic effect provides pharmacokinetic guidance for dose adjustments. There is a paucity of data regarding anti-Xa-directed enoxaparin dosing for treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate efficacy (recurrent VTE) and safety (major bleed) between enoxaparin anti-Xa-guided dose adjustments and weight-based dosing in patients with cancer-associated VTE. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study examined patients treated with enoxaparin for cancer-associated VTE using data from electronic health records. RESULTS: There were 674 patients who met the inclusion criteria, with 283 receiving anti-Xa-directed dose adjustments. Recurrent VTE, major bleed, or all-cause death occurred in 102 of 283 patients (36%) in the anti-Xa cohort and 166 of 391 patients (42.5%) in the weight-based cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.57-0.93; P = 0.01). When death was removed from the composite end point, there was no significant difference between the cohorts in recurrent VTE or major bleed (HR = 1.18; P = 0.38). In the anti-Xa cohort, a total of 1584 anti-Xa peak levels were collected, with 1324 (83.6%) drawn correctly in relation to enoxaparin administration. Of those, 714 (53.9%) were within therapeutic range. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patients with cancer receiving anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dose adjustments for initial VTE, compared with weight-based dosing, had no significant difference in the rate of recurrent VTE or major bleed.