Long-term safety and efficacy of velmanase alfa treatment in children under 6 years of age with alpha-mannosidosis: A phase 2, open label, multicenter study.

Alpha-mannosidosis (AM) is a rare, autosomal recessive, lysosomal storage disorder caused by alpha-mannosidase deficiency that leads to the accumulation of mannose-rich oligosaccharides. AM symptoms and severity vary among individuals; consequently, AM is often not diagnosed until late childhood. Velmanase alfa (VA), a recombinant human lysosomal alpha-mannosidase product, is the first enzyme replacement therapy indicated to treat non-neurological symptoms of AM in Europe. Previous studies suggested that early VA treatment in children may produce greater clinical benefit over the disease course than starting treatment in adolescents or adults; however, long-term studies in children are limited, and very few studies include children under 6 years of age. The present phase 2, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of long-term VA treatment in children under 6 years of age with AM. Five children (three males) received VA weekly for ≥24 months, and all children completed the study. Four children experienced adverse drug reactions (16 events) and two experienced infusion-related reactions (12 events). Most (99.5%) adverse events were mild or moderate, and none caused study discontinuation. Four children developed antidrug antibodies (three were neutralizing). After VA treatment, all children improved in one or more efficacy assessments of serum oligosaccharide concentrations (decreases), hearing, immunological profile, and quality of life, suggesting a beneficial effect of early treatment. Although the small study size limits conclusions, these results suggest that long-term VA treatment has an acceptable safety profile, is well tolerated, and may provide potential benefits to patients with AM under 6 years of age.

Four-year review of New Zealand laboratory infliximab and adalimumab concentration results indicating potential for improved dosing.

A review of laboratory results across New Zealand for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) over 4 years was completed. Of 6591 results, the median serum concentration for infliximab was 5.7 mg/L and for adalimumab was 5.5 mg/L. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations (<7 mg/L) were measured in 54% of samples. Drug concentrations <2 mg/L were measured in 23% of samples, with ADAs detected in 51% of these. The high number of samples with subtherapeutic drug concentrations and common ADA detection is consistent with failing therapy but could also suggest that standard dosing is frequently too low for patients. These results reinforce the value of antitumour necrosis factor drug TDM in making decisions to adjust dosing or switch agents in patients taking infliximab and adalimumab.

Preclinical Safety Assessment of 2 Inhaled Single-Domain Antibodies in the Cynomolgus Monkey.

The safety of 2 single domain antibodies (dAbs) was evaluated by inhalation toxicology studies in the cynomolgus monkey. In the first case study, a 14-day repeat-dose study evaluating an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (anti-TSLP) dAb resulted in minimal mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrates in the lungs, increases in lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). In a 6-week inhalation study, there was an increase in incidence and/or severity of mononuclear cell infiltrates in the lung, increased cellularity in the tracheobronchial lymph node (TBLN), and development of ADA. The second case study evaluated a change in duration of inhalation dosing, a different route of exposure (intravenous or IV), and recovery following an off-dose period with an anti-tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 dAb. A 7-day repeat-dose inhalation study and a 14-day IV study produced no microscopic effects in the lung, whereas a 14-day inhalation study resulted in moderate increases in pulmonary perivascular/peribronchiolar/alveolar lymphocytic infiltrates and increased cellularity in the TBLN, with partial and full recovery, respectively, after 14 days. The lung and lymph node findings seen after inhalation of either dAb were considered secondary to the immunogenic response to a human protein and were considered nonadverse.

BSTP Review of 12 Case Studies Discussing the Challenges, Pathology, Immunogenicity, and Mechanisms of Inhaled Biologics.

The inhalation route is a relatively novel drug delivery route for biotherapeutics and, as a result, there is a paucity of published data and experience within the toxicology/pathology community. In recent years, findings arising in toxicology studies with inhaled biologics have provoked concern and regulatory challenges due, in part, to the lack of understanding of the expected pathology, mechanisms, and adversity induced by this mode of delivery. In this manuscript, the authors describe 12 case studies, comprising 18 toxicology studies, using a range of inhaled biotherapeutics (monoclonal antibodies, fragment antigen-binding antibodies, domain antibodies, therapeutic proteins/peptides, and an oligonucleotide) in rodents, nonhuman primates (NHPs), and the rabbit in subacute (1 week) to chronic (26 weeks) toxicology studies. Analysis of the data revealed that many of these molecules were associated with a characteristic pattern of toxicity with high levels of immunogenicity. Microscopic changes in the airways consisted of a predominantly lymphoid perivascular/peribronchiolar (PV/PB) mononuclear inflammatory cell (MIC) infiltrate, whereas changes in the terminal airways/alveoli were characterized by simple ("uncomplicated") increases in macrophages or inflammatory cell infiltrates ranging from mixed inflammatory cell infiltration to inflammation. The PV/PB MIC changes were considered most likely secondary to immunogenicity, whereas simple increases in alveolar macrophages were most likely secondary to clearance mechanisms. Alveolar inflammatory cell infiltrates and inflammation were likely induced by immune modulation or stimulation through pharmacologic effects on target biology or type III hypersensitivity (immune complex disease). Finally, a group of experts provide introductory thoughts regarding the adversity of inhaled biotherapeutics and the basis for reasonable differences of opinion that might arise between toxicologists, pathologists, and regulators.

Optimization of infliximab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease using a dashboard approach-an Indian experience.

PURPOSE: Infliximab (IFX) therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with loss of response in half the patients, due to complex pharmacokinetic and immunological factors. Dashboard's Bayesian algorithms use information from model and individual multivariate determinants of IFX concentration and can predict dose and dosing interval. AIM: To compare measured IFX concentrations in our laboratory with values predicted by iDose dashboard system and report its efficacy in managing patients not responding to conventional dosing schedule. METHOD: Clinical history, demographic details, and laboratory findings such as albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) data of IBD patients (n = 30; median age 23 years (IQR: 14.25 - 33.5)) referred for IFX drug monitoring in our laboratory from November 2017 to November 2019 were entered in iDose software. The IFX concentration predicted by iDose based on this information was compared with that measured in our laboratory. In addition, a prospective dashboard-guided dosing was prescribed in 11 of these 30 patients not responding to conventional dosing and was followed to assess their clinical outcome. RESULT: IFX monitoring in our 30 patients had shown therapeutic concentration in 12, supratherapeutic in 2 and subtherapeutic concentration in 16 patients. The iDose predicted concentration showed concordance in 21 of these 30 patients. Of 11 patients managed with iDose-assisted prospective dosing, 8 achieved clinical remission, 2 showed partial response, and one developed antibodies. CONCLUSION: Retrospective data analysis showed concordance between laboratory measured and iDose-predicted IFX level in 70% of patients. iDose-assisted management achieved clinical remission and cost reduction.

Immunogenicity and skin clearance recapture in clinical studies of brodalumab.

BACKGROUND: Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) may change pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic profiles of biologic therapies, potentially decreasing efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effects of brodalumab immunogenicity on safety, efficacy, and retreatment. METHODS: Data from 1 phase 2 and 3 phase 3 studies of brodalumab in psoriasis were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 2.7% of patients had positive test results for binding ADAs after receiving brodalumab; ADAs were transient in 1.4% of patients, and there were no neutralizing ADAs. Among ADA-positive patients, 60.0% (3/5) achieved a static physician's global assessment score of 0 or 1 at week 12 in the group receiving the brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks, compared with 79.1% (1131/1429) of ADA-negative patients. All patients (100%) who experienced return of disease and were retreated with brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks (none were ADA positive) achieved at least a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area And Severity Index, ≥90% of whom regained response by week 8 of retreatment. Hypersensitivity reactions were less frequent with brodalumab than with placebo. Injection site reactions occurred in 1.8% of patients treated with brodalumab versus 2% of patients treated with ustekinumab. LIMITATIONS: Retreatment could be assessed in only 1 phase 3 brodalumab study. CONCLUSION: Brodalumab compares favorably with other biologics in terms of immunogenicity and high rates of efficacy recapture upon retreatment.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Obinutuzumab in Cynomolgus Monkeys and Relevance to Humans.

Obinutuzumab (GA101, Gazyva™, Gazyvaro®, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) is a humanized, glycoengineered type II antibody targeted against CD20. The preclinical safety evaluation required to support clinical development and marketing authorization of obinutuzumab included repeat-dose toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys for up to 6-month dosing with a 9-month recovery period. Results from those studies showed decreases in circulating B cells and corresponding B-cell depletion in lymphoid tissues, consistent with the desired pharmacology of obinutuzumab. Hypersensitivity reactions were noted at all doses in the 6-month study and were attributed to the foreign recognition of the drug construct in cynomolgus monkeys. Findings in monkeys were classified as acute hypersensitivity reactions that were evident immediately after dosing, such as excessive salivation, erythema, pruritus, irregular respiration, or ataxia, or chronic hypersensitivity reactions characterized by glomerulonephritis, arteritis/periarteritis, and inflammation in several tissues including serosal/adventitial inflammation. Immune complex deposits were demonstrated in tissues by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy. Some of, but not all, the animals that developed these reactions had detectable antidrug antibodies or circulating immune complexes accompanied by loss of drug exposure and pharmacodynamic effect. On the basis of clinical evidence to date, hypersensitivity reactions following obinutuzumab are rare, further supporting the general view that incidence and manifestation of immunogenicity in nonclinical species are generally not predictive for humans.

Antidrug Antibody Formation in Oncology: Clinical Relevance and Challenges.

: In oncology, an increasing number of targeted anticancer agents and immunotherapies are of biological origin. These biological drugs may trigger immune responses that lead to the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). ADAs are directed against immunogenic parts of the drug and may affect efficacy and safety. In other medical fields, such as rheumatology and hematology, the relevance of ADA formation is well established. However, the relevance of ADAs in oncology is just starting to be recognized, and literature on this topic is scarce. In an attempt to fill this gap in the literature, we provide an up-to-date status of ADA formation in oncology. In this focused review, data on ADAs was extracted from 81 clinical trials with biological anticancer agents. We found that most biological anticancer drugs in these trials are immunogenic and induce ADAs (63%). However, it is difficult to establish the clinical relevance of these ADAs. In order to determine this relevance, the possible effects of ADAs on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety parameters need to be investigated. Our data show that this was done in fewer than 50% of the trials. In addition, we describe the incidence and consequences of ADAs for registered agents. We highlight the challenges in ADA detection and argue for the importance of validating, standardizing, and describing well the used assays. Finally, we discuss prevention strategies such as immunosuppression and regimen adaptations. We encourage the launch of clinical trials that explore these strategies in oncology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Because of the increasing use of biologicals in oncology, many patients are at risk of developing antidrug antibodies (ADAs) during therapy. Although clinical consequences are uncertain, ADAs may affect pharmacokinetics, patient safety, and treatment efficacy. ADA detection and reporting is currently highly inconsistent, which makes it difficult to evaluate the clinical consequences. Standardized reporting of ADA investigations in the context of the aforementioned parameters is critical to understanding the relevance of ADA formation for each drug. Furthermore, the development of trials that specifically aim to investigate clinical prevention strategies in oncology is needed.

Advances in anticancer immunotoxin therapy.

Immunotoxins are a novel class of antibody-conjugated therapeutics currently in clinical development for a variety of malignancies. They consist of an antibody-based targeting domain fused to a bacterial toxin payload for cell killing. Immunotoxins kill cells by inhibiting protein synthesis, a unique mechanism of action that is toxic to both dividing and nondividing cells. Recent advances in the design and administration of immunotoxins are overcoming historical challenges in the field, leading to renewed interest in these therapeutics.

Early trough levels and antibodies to infliximab predict safety and success of reinitiation of infliximab therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Few agents are available for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, and patients frequently become unresponsive to biologics. We investigated the feasibility of reinitiating infliximab therapy for patients who previously received only episodic therapy with, lost response to, or had infusion reactions to infliximab. We also aimed to identify factors associated with the success and safety of restarting infliximab, such as antibodies to infliximab and trough levels of the drug. METHODS: From the inflammatory bowel disease biobank, we identified 128 consecutive patients (105 patients with Crohn's disease, 23 patients with ulcerative colitis) who restarted infliximab after a median 15-month discontinuation (range, 6-125 mo; 28 patients for loss of response or infusion reactions, 100 patients for remission or pregnancy). We also analyzed serum samples that had been collected during the first period of infliximab therapy (T-1), when therapy was reinitiated (T0), and at later time points (T+1, T+2) for trough levels and antibodies to infliximab. We investigated correlations among response to treatment, infusion reactions, treatment modalities, trough levels, and antibodies to infliximab. RESULTS: Reinitiation of infliximab therapy produced a response in 84.5% of patients at week 14, 70% of patients at 1 year, and in 61% of patients at more than 4 years. Fifteen patients had acute infusion reactions and 10 patients had delayed infusion reactions. The absence of antibodies to infliximab at T+1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.026-0.74; P = .021) and reinitiation with concomitant immunomodulator therapy were associated with short-term responses (HR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-27; P = .019). Pregnancy or remission as reason for discontinuation (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.09-6.67; P = .033) and higher trough levels at T+1 (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.18-7.69; P = .021) were associated with long-term response. Undetectable antibodies to infliximab at T+1 were associated with the safety of reinitiating therapy (HR for infusion reaction with detectable antibodies to infliximab, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.88-31.3; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Reinitiating infliximab therapy can be safe and effective for patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis after a median 15-month discontinuation period.

Characterization, biomarkers, and reversibility of a monoclonal antibody-induced immune complex disease in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

Two 6-month repeat-dose toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys illustrated immune complex-mediated adverse findings in individual monkeys and identified parameters that potentially signal the onset of immune complex-mediated reactions following administration of RN6G, a monoclonal antibody (mAb). In the first study, 3 monkeys exhibited nondose-dependent severe clinical signs accompanied by decreased erythrocytes with increased reticulocytes, neutrophilia, monocytosis, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, decreased albumin, azotemia, and increased serum levels of activated complement products, prompting unscheduled euthanasia. Histologically, immunohistochemical localization of RN6G was associated with monkey immunoglobulin and complement components in glomeruli and other tissues, attributable to immune complex disease (ICD). All 3 animals also had anti-RN6G antibodies and decreased plasma levels of RN6G. Subsequently, an investigational study was designed and conducted with regulatory agency input to detect early onset of ICD and assess reversibility to support further clinical development. Dosing of individual animals ceased when biomarkers of ICD indicated adverse findings. Of the 12 monkeys, 1 developed anti-RN6G antibodies and decreased RN6G exposure that preceded elevations in complement products, interleukin-6, and coagulation parameters and decreases in albumin and fibrinogen. All findings in this monkey, except for antidrug antibody (ADA), reversed after cessation of dosing without progressing to adverse sequelae typically associated with ICD.

Sample size consideration for immunoassay screening cut-point determination.

Past decades have seen a rapid growth of biopharmaceutical products on the market. The administration of such large molecules can generate antidrug antibodies that can induce unwanted immune reactions in the recipients. Assessment of immunogenicity is required by regulatory agencies in clinical and nonclinical development, and this demands a well-validated assay. One of the important performance characteristics during assay validation is the cut point, which serves as a threshold between positive and negative samples. To precisely determine the cut point, a sufficiently large data set is often needed. However, there is no guideline other than some rule-of-thumb recommendations for sample size requirement in immunoassays. In this article, we propose a systematic approach to sample size determination for immunoassays and provide tables that facilitate its applications by scientists.

Risk-based approach of bioanalytical methods for clinical immunogenicity assessment of multidomain biotherapeutics.

Tweetable abstract Risk-based bioanalytical method development for clinical antidrug antibody detection and characterization of multidomain biotherapeutics.

Assessment of mirvetuximab soravtansine immunogenicity in patients with folate receptor alpha-positive ovarian cancer.

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the immunogenicity of mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate in patients with folate receptor alpha-positive ovarian cancer across four clinical studies.Materials & methods: An assay was developed and validated for the detection of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) against MIRV. A cell-based method was also developed and validated for the detection of neutralizing anti-MIRV antibodies (NAbs). Both ADAs and NAbs were assessed across four clinical studies in 734 patients.Results: Across studies, MIRV demonstrated low immunogenicity with 7.8% of patients with treatment-emergent ADAs, 7.2% with treatment-unaffected ADAs, and 0.5% with treatment-enhanced ADAs. MIRV trough concentrations were comparable in ADA-negative and ADA-positive individuals. Limited data suggest that MIRV ADAs may be associated with decreased efficacy. Due to the very limited number of NAb-positive individuals, no conclusions could be drawn on the effect of NAb on efficacy.Conclusion: Both the validation tests and the data from the MIRV clinical studies demonstrated that these assays were suitable and reliable for the detection of MIRV ADAs and NAbs. These validated assays will continue to be used to monitor MIRV immunogenicity in future clinical trials.

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is a new drug of cancer treatment that targets a protein called folate receptor alpha, which is often found in certain ovarian cancers that do not respond to platinum-based therapies. To check if patients' immune systems react to this drug, we developed tests to look for antibodies that may form against MIRV. These antibodies can affect how well the drug works.The study looked at 734 patients in four different clinical trials. It found that MIRV triggered an immune response in only a small number of patients ­ 7.8% developed new antibodies after starting treatment. However, most of these antibodies did not seem to impact the effectiveness of the drug, and patients with or without antibodies had similar levels of the drug in their bodies. Some data hinted that having antibodies might slightly reduce how well the drug works, but there were not enough patients who developed these antibodies to be certain. Another test was done to check if certain antibodies blocked MIRV from working, but very few patients (31 out of 734) had these, so no conclusions could be made.Overall, the tests were shown to work well and will continue to be used in future studies to monitor how patients' immune systems respond to MIRV.

Signal-to-noise ratio to assess magnitude, kinetics and impact on pharmacokinetics of the immune response to an adalimumab biosimilar.

Background: The antidrug antibody (ADA) signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio was explored as a novel immunogenicity measure to evaluate the immune response of healthy subjects to a single dose of GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar. Methodology/results: Bioanalytical methods used for the analysis of ADA S/N ratios and ADA titers were validated for sensitivity, precision and drug interference. ADA S/N ratios strongly correlated with ADA titers. Correlations between ADA area under the curve and ADAmax and pharmacokinetics (PK) were stronger for ADA S/N ratio than for ADA titers. Conclusion: ADA S/N ratio allowed for a more sensitive evaluation of the magnitude and kinetics of the immune response, was better correlated with adalimumab PK and was superior to ADA titers in assessing the impact of the immune response on PK.

Strategy and validation of a nonclinical generic plug-and-play antidrug antibody method for human monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics.

The measurement of antidrug antibodies (ADA) in nonclinical studies provides limited value because the formation and incidence of nonclinical ADA does not translate to clinical experience. The formation and presence of ADA in nonclinical species can, however, correlate to reduced drug exposure and safety observations including vasculitis and immune complex disease. Generic ADA methods for humanized monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics mitigate the need to develop bespoke ADA methods during nonclinical drug development. A drug-tolerant, sensitive, generic ADA immunoassay has been developed and validated for measuring ADA in cynomolgus monkey serum samples, allowing for immediate qualification of future monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics. This approach allows us to differentiate complexed and free ADA in a rapidly deployable manner when needed.

The testing of antidrug antibodies (ADA) in animal studies offers low value because the presence of animal ADA does not translate to human studies. However, the impact of ADA can be seen with reduced drug levels and/or safety findings in animal studies. Generic ADA methods offer a way to measure ADA leading to time and cost savings. This article details the testing of a generic plug-and-play method to measure ADA in monkey serum and how to qualify future drugs. To date, 16 drugs have been qualified using this method, which has also been applied to mouse, rat and rabbit serum.

Effects of switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-ß on biomarkers, renal and cardiac parameters, and disease severity in fabry disease forming neutralizing antidrug antibodies: a case report.

Fabry disease is an X-linked hereditary disorder caused by deficient α-galactosidase A (GLA) activity. Patients with Fabry disease are often treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). However, ERT often induces the formation of neutralizing antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may impair the therapeutic efficacy. Here, we report the case of a 32-year-old man with Fabry disease and resultant neutralizing ADAs who was treated by switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-ß. We monitored biomarkers, such as plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3), urinary globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), urinary mulberry bodies, renal and cardiac parameters, and disease severity during the treatment period. Although plasma lyso-Gb3 and urinary Gb3 levels quickly decreased within two months after the initiation of ERT with agalsidase-α, they gradually increased thereafter. The urinary mulberry bodies continued to appear. Both the ADA titer and serum mediated GLA inhibition rates started to increase after two months. Moreover, 3.5 years after ERT, the vacuolated podocyte area in the renal biopsy decreased slightly from 23.1 to 18.9%. However, plasma lyso-Gb3 levels increased, and urinary Gb3, mulberry body levels, and ADA titers remained high. Therefore, we switched to agalsidase-ß which reduced, but did not normalize, plasma lyso-Gb3 levels and stabilized renal and cardiac parameters. Disease severity was attenuated. However, urinary Gb3 and mulberry body levels did not decrease noticeably in the presence of high ADA titers. The kidneys take up a small amount of the administered recombinant enzyme, and the clearance of Gb3 that has accumulated in the kidney may be limited despite the switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-ß.

Upfront acid treatment with low final pH: the development and testing of a novel method to improve drug tolerance in antidrug antibody assays.

Background: The drug tolerance of an antidrug antibody (ADA) assay for a therapeutic monoclonal antibody was insufficient to meet the level of biotherapeutic expected in sera, and a typical acid dissociation method was inadequate. Other strategies were investigated to dissociate ADA-drug complexes and thereby improve drug tolerance. Results: Having a lower final pH of samples after acid dissociation was shown to greatly improve drug tolerance. This method was shown to improve drug tolerance in the ADA assays for four additional monoclonal antibodies and to better detect ADAs in clinical samples. Conclusion: These findings provide a novel alternative method for improving drug tolerance when other methods are not sufficient.

GP2017-HCF, a high concentration formulation, demonstrates similar pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety to GP2017, an approved adalimumab biosimilar.

BACKGROUND: GP2017 is an adalimumab biosimilar. The objective of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GP2017 in its approved formulation and GP2017-high concentration formulation (HCF) in a randomized, double-blind, two-arm PK bridging study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy male subjects received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of either GP2017-HCF (n = 162) or GP2017 (n = 168). PK, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals [CIs] of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for Cmax, AUC0-inf, AUC0-360 and AUC0-last were within the pre-defined margin of 0.80 to 1.25; thus, PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 was demonstrated. Subgroup analysis of PK comparability by anti-drug antibody (ADA) subpopulation showed that the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for Cmax, AUC0-inf, AUC0-360 and AUC0-last were within the margin of 0.80 to 1.25 in ADA-positive and ADA-negative subjects. The proportions of subjects with positive ADA responses and with neutralizing antibodies were comparable between the GP2017-HCF and GP2017 groups. GP2017-HCF and GP2017 were well tolerated, and there were no reports of deaths or other serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results show PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 and comparable safety and tolerability.

Relationship between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups, antidrug antibody detection, and long-term velmanase alfa treatment outcomes in patients with alpha-mannosidosis.

Alpha-mannosidosis (AM), an autosomal recessive disorder caused by pathogenic biallelic variants in the MAN2B1 gene, leads to lysosomal alpha-mannosidase deficiency and accumulation of mannose-rich oligosaccharides. Velmanase alfa (VA), a recombinant human lysosomal alpha-mannosidase, is the first enzyme replacement therapy for non-neurological symptoms of AM. Previously, a potential relationship was identified between three MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups (G1, G2, and G3) and AM disease severity. In VA-treated patients with AM, it is unknown if a relationship exists between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups, antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and infusion-related reactions (IRRs). This pooled analysis evaluated data from 33 VA-treated patients with AM to investigate this relationship. Overall, 10 patients were positive for ADAs, 4 of whom had treatment-emergent ADAs (G1: 3/7 [43%]; G2: 1/17 [6%]; G3: 0/9). Treatment-emergent ADA-positive patients with relatively high titers (n = 2; G1: 1012 U/ml and G2: 440 U/ml) experienced mild/moderate IRRs that were well-managed; patients with lower titers (n = 2) experienced no IRRs. Overall, changes from baseline in serum oligosaccharides and immunoglobulin G levels did not vary between ADA-positive and ADA-negative patients, suggesting a similar effect of VA treatment regardless of ADA status in most patients. Clinical outcomes (3MSCT and 6MWT) were also similar in most patients regardless of ADA status. While further studies are needed, these data suggest a relationship between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups and ADA development, with G1 and G2 subgroups more likely to develop ADAs and IRRs. Regardless, this study suggests that ADAs have limited effect on the clinical impact of VA in most patients with AM.