RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of aggressive pathology for cT1 solid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by combining clinical features with qualitative and quantitative CT parameters, and developed a nomogram model. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 776 cT1 solid RCC patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) between 2018 and 2022. All patients underwent four-phase contrast-enhanced CT scans and the CT parameters were obtained by two experienced radiologists using region of interest (ROI). Aggressive pathology was defined as patients with nuclear grade III-IV; upstage to pT3a; type II papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), collecting duct or renal medullary carcinoma, unclassified RCC or sarcomatoid/rhabdoid features. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to determine significant predictors and develop the nomogram model. To evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of the nomogram model, we used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, decision curve analysis (DCA), risk stratification, and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Of the 776 cT1 solid RCC patients, 250 (32.2%) had aggressive pathological features. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of CT parameters accessed by two reviewers ranged from 0.758 to 0.982. Logistic regression analyses showed that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), distance to the collecting system, CT necrosis, tumor margin irregularity, peritumoral neovascularity, and RER-NP were independent predictive factors associated with aggressive pathology. We built the nomogram model using these significant variables, which had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.854 in the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: Our research demonstrated that preoperative four-phase contrast-enhanced CT was critical for predicting aggressive pathology in cT1 solid RCC, and the constructed nomogram was useful in guiding patient treatment and postoperative follow-up.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Nomogramas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
PURPOSE: Preoperative proteinuria is a prognostic factor of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We assessed the association between preoperative proteinuria and postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our records of patients with a single malignant renal mass who underwent PN between 2000 and 2021. Patients with data on preoperative proteinuria were included. Baseline characteristics and eGFR differences over time between patients with and without proteinuria were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models (LRM) tested for presence of CKDIII or higher at 12-month and at last follow-up. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-five patients were included. Twenty-two of them had preoperative proteinuria. No differences of age, smoking status, hypertension or diabetes, tumor size and use of ischemia were observed. Patients with proteinuria had a higher rate of CKD-III at baseline. At a median follow-up of 46.5 months (IQR 19-82), 117 patients developed de novo CKD-III, without differences in the two groups. No differences in decline in eGFR were observed. At univariate LRM, predictors of CKD-III at 12 months after PN were preoperative proteinuria (OR 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-7.8, p = 0.005), age and baseline eGFR, while predictors of CKD-III at last follow-up were age and baseline eGFR. At multivariable LRM, only baseline eGFR predicted CKD-III at 12-month and at last-follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative eGFR is the only independent predictor of long-term renal function after PN. Preoperative proteinuria correlates with renal function at 12 months. Proteinuria should be assessed before PN to identify patients at higher risk of renal functional deterioration in the 12 months following PN.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Neoplasias Renais , Nefrectomia , Período Pré-Operatório , Proteinúria , Humanos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Masculino , Proteinúria/etiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Idoso , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Correlação de Dados , Rim/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has become the dominant treatment modality for cT1 renal tumor lesions. Tumors suspected of malignant potential are indicated for surgery, but some are histologically classified as benign lesions after surgery. This study aims to analyze the number of benign findings after PN according to definitive histology and to evaluate whether there is an association between malignant tumor findings and individual factors. METHODS: The retrospective study included 555 patients who underwent open or robotic-assisted PN for a tumor in our clinic from January 2013 to December 2020. The cohort was divided into groups according to definitive tumor histology (malignant tumors vs. benign lesions). The association of factors (age, sex, tumor size, R.E.N.A.L.) with the malignant potential of the tumor was further evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 462 tumors were malignant (83%) and 93 benign (17%). Of the malignant tumors, 66% were clear-cell RCC (renal cell carcinoma), 12% papillary RCC, and 6% chromophobe RCC. The most common benign tumor was oncocytoma in 10% of patients, angiomyolipoma in 2%, and papillary adenoma in 1%. In univariate analysis, there was a higher risk of malignant tumor in males (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.36-3.36, p = 0.001), a higher risk of malignancy in tumors larger than 20 mm (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.43-3.74, p < 0.001), and a higher risk of malignancy in tumors evaluated by R.E.N.A.L. as tumors of intermediate or high complexity (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.76-4.47, p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no association between older age and the risk of malignant renal tumor (p = 0.878). CONCLUSIONS: In this group, 17% of tumors had benign histology. Male sex, tumor size greater than 20 mm, and intermediate or high R.E.N.A.L. complexity were statistically significant predictors of malignant tumor findings.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Nefrectomia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Feminino , Nefrectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Angiomiolipoma/patologia , Angiomiolipoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Período Pré-Operatório , Adenoma Oxífilo/patologia , Adenoma Oxífilo/cirurgiaRESUMO
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are often used for treatment of several types of cancer; however, they are associated with an increased risk of proteinuria, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation. We searched PubMed and Scopus to identify clinical studies examining the incidence and risk factors for proteinuria caused by VEGFR-TKIs in patients with renal cell carcinoma, thyroid cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The global incidence of proteinuria ranged from 6% to 34% for all grades of proteinuria, and from 1% to 10% for grade ≥3 proteinuria. The incidence of proteinuria did not differ significantly by cancer type, but in all three cancer types, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of proteinuria with lenvatinib than with other VEGFR-TKIs. In terms of risk factors, the incidence of proteinuria was significantly higher among Asians (including Japanese) compared with non-Asian populations. Other risk factors included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and previous nephrectomy. When grade 3/4 proteinuria occurs, patients should be treated according to the criteria for dose reduction or withdrawal specified for each drug. For grade 2 proteinuria, treatment should be continued when the benefits outweigh the risks. Referral to a nephrologist should be considered for symptoms related to decreased renal function or when proteinuria has not improved after medication withdrawal. These management practices should be implemented universally, regardless of the cancer type.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Proteinúria , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/complicações , Incidência , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Prevalência , Proteinúria/epidemiologia , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/complicações , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , /uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The majority of children with unilateral renal masses suspicious for malignancy undergo radical nephrectomy, while nephron-sparing surgery is reserved for select cases. We investigated the impact of tumor size on the probability of histology. We hypothesized that pediatric small renal masses are more likely benign or non-Wilms tumor, thus potentially appropriate for nephron-sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database was analyzed for patients aged 0-18 years diagnosed with a unilateral renal mass from 2000-2016. Statistical analysis was performed to help determine a tumor size cut point to predict Wilms tumor and assess the predictive value of tumor size on Wilms tumor histology. Additionally, a retrospective review was performed of patients 0-18 years old who underwent surgery for a unilateral renal mass at a single institution from 2005-2019. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of tumor size on final histology. RESULTS: From the SEER analysis, 2,016 patients were included. A total of 1,672 tumors (82.9%) were Wilms tumor. Analysis revealed 4 cm to be a suitable cut point to distinguish non-Wilms tumor. Tumors ≥4 cm were more likely Wilms tumor (OR 2.67, P ≤ .001), but this was driven by the statistical significance in children 5-9 years old. From the institutional analysis, 134 patients were included. Ninety-seven tumors (72.3%) were Wilms tumor. Tumors ≥4 cm had higher odds of being Wilms tumor (OR 30.85, P = .001), malignant (OR 6.75, P = .005), and having radical nephrectomy-appropriate histology (OR 46.79, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The probability that a pediatric unilateral renal mass is Wilms tumor increases with tumor size. Four centimeters is a logical cut point to start the conversation around defining pediatric small renal masses and may help predict nephron-sparing surgery-appropriate histology.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Tumor de Wilms , Criança , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Néfrons/cirurgia , Néfrons/patologia , Tumor de Wilms/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Multiple prognostic models exist to assess survival among patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. However, the relative contribution of histopathological features of the metastasis has not been extensively studied. Herein, we compared models using clinical, primary tumor, and metastatic features to predict cancer-specific survival for patients with surgically resected metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 266 patients who had undergone nephrectomy between 1970 and 2019, and who had a single site of metastasis completely resected. Two versions of the metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma score published by Leibovich et al were calculated, using grade and necrosis from the primary tumor and using grade and necrosis from the metastasis. Predictive abilities of these 2 versions and a third model that included metastatic features only were compared using c-indexes from Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients died from renal cell carcinoma at a median of 2.3 years (IQR 1.1-4.5); median follow-up among survivors was 13.2 years (IQR 10.0-14.5). The Leibovich score using grade and necrosis from the metastasis (c=0.679) had similar predictive ability compared to the original Leibovich score using grade and necrosis from the primary tumor (c=0.675). A third model (c=0.707) demonstrated that metastasectomy within 2 years after nephrectomy, presence of bone metastasis, high grade, and sarcomatoid differentiation in the metastasis were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Scoring algorithms calculated using histopathological features of the metastasis can be used to predict cancer-specific survival for patients with surgically resected metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. These findings are of particular importance for instances when primary tumor histopathology is not readily available.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Prognóstico , Nefrectomia , Necrose , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The KEYNOTE-564 trial demonstrated that adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma decreased the risk of disease progression and potentially overall mortality as well. Herein, we used a Markov model to weigh the costs, toxicities, and efficacy of pembrolizumab to further investigate its utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Decision-analytic Markov modeling was used to conduct a cost-utility analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation after nephrectomy for high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma, using data from KEYNOTE-564 to inform model probabilities. Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life years, Medicare costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The willingness-to-pay threshold utilized was $100,000/quality-adjusted life year. RESULTS: At 5 years, adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab resulted in 0.3 additional quality-adjusted life years at an additional cost of $99,484 relative to observation. Pembrolizumab was found not to be cost-effective at a 5-year time horizon (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio=$326,534). On sensitivity analysis, pembrolizumab became cost-effective if its per cycle cost was <$5,064 (base=$10,278) or its 5-year progression benefit was >18.8% (base 9%). Upon simulation, pembrolizumab was cost-effective for 29% of patients at 5 years. Specifically, we found that pembrolizumab would be cost-effective at 5 years for patients with at least a 59% 5 year risk of progression, which corresponds to a Mayo Progression-free Survival Score ≥10. CONCLUSIONS: At current prices, adjuvant pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective only for the highest risk subset of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients 5 years after treatment, including patients with complete metastasectomy, regional lymph node involvement, or ≥7cm pT3 tumors with sarcomatoid features. Longer-term trial data, including overall survival results, are necessary to confirm these extrapolations.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Seleção de Pacientes , Medicare , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated higher complete response rates in the immuno-oncology-based combination arms than in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor arms in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to characterize real-world patients who experienced complete response to the contemporary first-line therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, response-evaluable patients who received frontline immuno-oncology-based combination therapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy were analyzed. Baseline characteristics of patients and post-landmark overall survival were compared based on best overall response, as per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 52 (4.6%) of 1,126 and 223 (3.0%) of 7,557 patients experienced complete response to immuno-oncology-based and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies, respectively (P = .005). An adjusted odds ratio for complete response achieved by immuno-oncology-based combination therapy (vs tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy) was 1.56 (95% CI 1.11-2.17; P = .009). Among patients who experienced complete response, the immuno-oncology-based cohort had a higher proportion of non-clear cell histology (15.9% and 4.7%; P = .016), sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (29.8% and 13.5%; P = .014), and multiple sites of metastases (80.4% and 50.0%; P < .001) than the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort. Complete response was independently associated with post-landmark overall survival benefit in both the immuno-oncology-based and tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohorts, giving respective adjusted hazard ratios of 0.17 (95% CI 0.04-0.72; P = .016) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.21-0.38; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The complete response rate was not as high in the real-world population as in the clinical trial population. Among those who experienced complete response, several adverse clinicopathological features were more frequently observed in the immuno-oncology-based cohort than in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort. Complete response was an indicator of favorable overall survival.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Imunoterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that partial nephrectomy (PN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) yield comparable outcomes for patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although the cost-effectiveness of both treatments still needs to be assessed. PURPOSE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of PN and PCA for patients with cT1a RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analysis was created over a 5-year span from a healthcare payer's perspective computing expected costs and outcomes of PN and PCA in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER). After each treatment, the following states were modelled using data from the recent literature: procedural complications, no evidence of disease (NED), local recurrence, metastases, and death from RCC- or non-RCC-related causes. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: PCA and PN yielded health benefits of 3.68 QALY and 3.67 QALY. Overall expected costs were $20,491 and $26,478 for PCA and PN. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PCA was more cost-effective than PN in 84.78% of Monte Carlo simulations. PCA was more cost-effective until its complication risk was at least 38% higher than PN. PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than that of PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than that of PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than that of PN. PCA remained cost-effective until its procedural cost is above $13,875. CONCLUSION: PCA appears to be more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, although the currently available evidence is of limited quality. PCA may be the better treatment strategy in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC-mortality in clinically plausible ranges. KEY POINTS: ⢠For patients with cT1a RCCs, PCA yields a comparable health benefit at lower costs compared to PN, making PCA the dominant and therefore more cost-effective treatment strategy over PN. ⢠PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than PN. ⢠PCA is more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, and it remained so in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC mortality.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Criocirurgia , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Criocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Nefrectomia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify adhesive renal venous tumor thrombus (RVTT) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by contrast-enhancement CT (CECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 53 patients who underwent preoperative CECT and pathologically confirmed RCC combined with RVTT. They were divided into two groups based on the intra-operative findings of RVTT adhesion to the venous wall, with 26 cases in the adhesive RVTT group (ARVTT) and 27 cases in the non-adhesive group (NRVTT). The location, maximum diameter (MD) and CT values of tumors, the maximum length (ML) and width (MW) of RVTT, and length of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus were compared between the two groups. The presence of renal venous wall involvement, renal venous wall inflammation, and enlarged retroperitoneal lymph node was compared between the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the diagnostic performance. RESULTS: The MD of RCC and the ML and MW of the RVTT were all larger in the ARVTT group than in the NRVTT group (p = 0.042, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002). The proportion of renal vein wall involvement and renal vein wall inflammation were higher in the ARVTT group than in NRVTT groups (both p < 0.001). The multivariable model including ML and vascular wall inflammation to predict ARVTT could achieve the best diagnostic performance with the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.91, 88.5%, 96.3%, and 92.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The multivariable model acquired by CECT images could be used to predict RVTT adhesion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: For RCC patients with tumor thrombus, contrast-enhanced CT could noninvasively predict the adhesion of tumor thrombus, thus predicting the difficulty of surgery and contributing to the selection of an appropriate treatment plan. KEY POINTS: ⢠The length and width of the tumor thrombus could be used to predict its adhesion to the vessel wall. ⢠Adhesion of the tumor thrombus can be reflected by inflammation of the renal vein wall. ⢠The multivariable model from CECT can well predict whether the tumor thrombus adhered to the vein wall.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Trombose , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/complicações , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Veia Cava Inferior/patologia , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/patologia , Trombose Venosa/patologia , Inflamação/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Nefrectomia/métodos , Trombectomia/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features can provide a more accurate prediction of surgical decision-making for partial or radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on multi-center cohorts. A total of 473 participants with pathologically proved renal cell carcinoma were split into the internal training and the external testing set. The training set contains 412 cases from five open-source cohorts and two local hospitals. The external testing set includes 61 participants from another local hospital. The proposed automatic analytic framework contains the following modules: a 3D kidney and tumor segmentation model constructed by 3D-UNet, a multi-level feature extractor based on the region of interest, and a partial or radical nephrectomy prediction classifier by XGBoost. The fivefold cross-validation strategy was used to get a robust model. A quantitative model interpretation method called the Shapley Additive Explanations was conducted to explore the contribution of each feature. RESULTS: In the prediction of partial versus radical nephrectomy, the combination of multi-level features achieved better performance than any single-level feature. For the internal validation, the AUROC was 0.93 ± 0.1, 0.94 ± 0.1, 0.93 ± 0.1, 0.93 ± 0.1, and 0.93 ± 0.1, respectively, as determined by the fivefold cross-validation. The AUROC from the optimal model was 0.82 ± 0.1 in the external testing set. The tumor shape Maximum 3D Diameter plays the most vital role in the model decision. CONCLUSIONS: The automated surgical decision framework for partial or radical nephrectomy based on 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features exhibits robust performance in renal cell carcinoma. The framework points the way towards guiding surgery through medical images and machine learning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We proposed an automated analytic framework that can assist surgeons in partial or radical nephrectomy decision-making. The framework points the way towards guiding surgery through medical images and machine learning. KEY POINTS: ⢠The 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features provide a more accurate prediction of surgical decision-making for partial or radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma. ⢠The data from multicenter study and a strict fivefold cross-validation strategy, both internal validation set and external testing set, can be easily transferred to different tasks of new datasets. ⢠The quantitative decomposition of the prediction model was conducted to explore the contribution of each extracted feature.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Previous trial results suggest that only a small number of patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) benefit from adjuvant therapy. We assessed whether the addition of CT-based radiomics to established clinico-pathological biomarkers improves recurrence risk prediction for adjuvant treatment decisions. METHODS: This retrospective study included 453 patients with non-metastatic RCC undergoing nephrectomy. Cox models were trained to predict disease-free survival (DFS) using post-operative biomarkers (age, stage, tumor size and grade) with and without radiomics selected on pre-operative CT. Models were assessed using C-statistic, calibration, and decision curve analyses (repeated tenfold cross-validation). RESULTS: At multivariable analysis, one of four selected radiomic features (wavelet-HHL_glcm_ClusterShade) was prognostic for DFS with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (p = 0.02), along with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage group (III versus I, HR 2.90; p = 0.002), grade 4 (versus grade 1, HR 8.90; p = 0.001), age (per 10 years HR 1.29; p = 0.03), and tumor size (per cm HR 1.13; p = 0.003). The discriminatory ability of the combined clinical-radiomic model (C = 0.80) was superior to that of the clinical model (C = 0.78; p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis revealed a net benefit of the combined model when used for adjuvant treatment decisions. At an exemplary threshold probability of ≥ 25% for disease recurrence within 5 years, using the combined versus the clinical model was equivalent to treating 9 additional patients (per 1000 assessed) who would recur without treatment (i.e., true-positive predictions) with no increase in false-positive predictions. CONCLUSION: Adding CT-based radiomic features to established prognostic biomarkers improved post-operative recurrence risk assessment in our internal validation study and may help guide decisions regarding adjuvant therapy. KEY POINTS: In patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy, CT-based radiomics combined with established clinical and pathological biomarkers improved recurrence risk assessment. Compared to a clinical base model, the combined risk model enabled superior clinical utility if used to guide decisions on adjuvant treatment.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Criança , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Accurate preoperative prediction of adverse pathology is crucial for treatment planning of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Previous studies have emphasized the potential of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in differentiating between benign and malignant localized renal tumors. However, there is a scarcity of case reports elucidating the identification of aggressive pathological features using PET/CT. Our study was designed to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of enhanced CT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with necrosis or sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective case series of patients with a newly diagnosed renal mass who underwent enhanced CT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-FDG PET/CT within 30 days prior to nephrectomy was included. Complete preoperative and postoperative clinicopathological data were recorded. Patients who received neoadjuvant targeted therapy, declined enhanced CT or PET/CT scanning, refused surgical treatment or had non-ccRCC pathological indications were excluded. Radiological parameters were compared within subgroups of pathological characteristics. Bonferroni corrections were used to adjust for multiple testing and statistical significance was set at a p-value less than 0.017. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were available for the final analysis. Enhanced CT demonstrated poor performance in identifying necrosis, sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation and adverse pathology (all P > 0.05). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was more effective than 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying tumor necrosis and adverse pathology, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (cutoff value=25.26, p<0.001; Delong test z=2.709, p=0.007) for tumor necrosis and AUC of 0.90 (cutoff value=25.26, p<0.001; Delong test z=3.433, p<0.001) for adverse pathology. However, no significant statistical difference was found between 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting sarcomatoid or rhabdoid feature (AUC of 0.91 vs.0.75, Delong test z=1.998, p=0.046). Subgroup analyses based on age, sex, tumor location, maximal diameter, stage and WHO/ISUP grade demonstrated that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT SUVmax had a significant predictive value for adverse pathology. Enhanced CT value and SUVmax demonstrated strong reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.80], indicating a robust correlation. CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT demonstrates distinct advantages in identifying aggressive pathological features of primary ccRCC when compared to enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Further research and assessment are warranted to fully establish the clinical utility of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in ccRCC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Masculino , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , NecroseRESUMO
PURPOSE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was challenged by the results of the CARMENA trial. Here we evaluate the role of CN in mRCC patients, including those receiving modern therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with synchronous mRCC between 2011-2020 from the de-identified nationwide Flatiron Health database. We evaluated 3 groups: systemic therapy alone, CN followed by systemic therapy (up-front CN [uCN]) and systemic therapy followed by CN (deferred CN [dCN]). The primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS) in patients receiving systemic therapy alone vs uCN. Secondary outcome was overall survival in patients receiving uCN vs dCN. First-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analyses were conducted to overcome immortal time bias. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the effect of therapy on survival. RESULTS: Of 1,910 patients with mRCC, 972 (57%) received systemic therapy, 605 (32%) received uCN, 142 (8%) dCN and 191 (10%) CN alone; 433 (23%) patients received immunotherapy-based therapy. The adjusted mOS was significantly improved in first-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analysis (mOS 26.6 vs 14.6 months, 36.3 vs 21.1 months and 26.1 vs 12.2 months, respectively) in patients undergoing CN. Among patients receiving CN and systemic therapy, the timing of systemic therapy relative to CN was not significantly related to overall survival (HR=1.0, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an oncologic role for CN in select mRCC patients. In patients receiving both CN and systemic therapy, the survival benefit compared to systemic alone was similar for up-front and deferred CN.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: We quantified the familial risk of renal cell cancer (RCC) among first-degree relatives (FDRs) on a population level, and examined interactions between family history and body mass index or blood glucose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Health Insurance database, which covers the entire Korean population, and the National Health Screening Program, we constructed a cohort of 5,524,403 individuals with blood-related FDRs and their lifestyle factors from 2002 to 2018. We calculated familial risk using incidence risk ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals, which compares the risk of individuals with and without FDR. The combined effect and interaction of a given risk factor and family history of RCC were measured by the relative excess risk due to interaction. RESULTS: Individuals with affected FDRs showed a 2.29-fold (95% CI 1.68-3.13) increased risk of disease. Familial risk adjusted for lifestyle factors showed minimal attenuation (IRR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.65-3.08), suggesting that genetic predisposition is the main contributor in the familial aggregation of RCC. Individuals with both a positive family history and overweight/obesity (IRR 3.71, 95% CI 2.50-4.92) or hyperglycemia (IRR 4.52, 95% CI 2.59-6.45) had a significantly higher risk that exceeded the sum of their individual risks, suggesting an interaction that was statistically significant (relative excess risk due to interaction 95% CI: 0.91, -0.21-2.12; 2.21, 0.28-4.14). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an interaction between genetic and environmental factors, namely obesity and hyperglycemia. Individuals with both factors should be considered a high-risk group and advised to undergo genetic counseling.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Hiperglicemia , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/etiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/genética , Família , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/etiologia , Neoplasias Renais/genética , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/genética , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Open radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (O-CT) is standard management for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus. First reported a decade ago, robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (R-CT) is a minimally invasive option for this disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the safety and feasibility of R-CT in terms of perioperative outcomes and compare the outcomes between R-CT and O-CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed®, Scopus®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of ScienceTM databases were searched using the free-text and MeSH terms "renal cell carcinoma," "inferior vena cava," "thrombosis" or "thrombus," "robot" and "thrombectomy." Studies reporting perioperative outcomes of R-CT and studies comparing R-CT with O-CT were included. The review was done in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS: The search retrieved 28 articles describing R-CT, including 7 comparative studies. This systematic review included 1,375 patients, out of which 329 patients were in single-arm studies and 1,046 patients were in comparative studies. Of the 329 patients who underwent R-CT, 14.7% were level I, 60.9% level II, 20.4% level III and 2.5% level IV thrombus. Operative time ranged from 150 to 530 minutes; blood transfusion was administered in 38.2% (126). The overall complication rate was 30.3% (99). R-CT, in comparison to O-CT, was associated with a lower blood transfusion rate (18.4% vs 64.3%, p=0.002) and a lower complication rate (14.5% vs 36.7%, p=0.005). Major complication and 30-day mortality rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: R-CT has acceptable perioperative outcomes in carefully selected patients. Compared with O-CT, R-CT is associated with a lower blood transfusion rate and fewer overall complications. In experienced hands with carefully selected patients, R-CT is feasible and safe, with acceptable outcomes; however, selection bias limits definitive inference of these results, and optimal patient selection criteria remain to be described.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Trombose , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/métodos , Veia Cava Inferior/patologia , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Percutaneous ablation therapy (AT) and partial nephrectomy (PN) are successful management strategies for T1a renal cancer. Our objective was to compare AT to PN with respect to recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients post-PN or -AT for cT1aN0M0 renal cancer from 2011 to 2021 were identified from the national Canadian Kidney Cancer information system. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity score (PS) was used. The primary outcomes, RFS and OS, were compared using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients underwent AT and 2,001 underwent PN, with a median followup of 2.0 years (IQR 0.6-4.1). Covariates were well balanced between the AT and PN cohorts following PS matching. Two-year RFS following IPTW PS analysis for patients undergoing AT and PN was 88.1% and 97.4% (p <0.0001), respectively, while 2-year OS was 97.4% and 99.0% (p=0.7), respectively. Five-year RFS following IPTW PS analysis for patients undergoing AT and PN was 86.0% and 95.1%, respectively (p=0.003), while 5-year OS was 94.2% and 95.1%, respectively (p=0.9). Following IPTW PS analysis, treatment modality (PN vs AT) was a predictor of disease recurrence (HR 0.36, p=0.003) but not for OS (HR 0.96, p=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: With short followup, PN offers better RFS than AT, although no significant difference in OS was detected following PS adjustments. Both modalities can be offered to appropriately selected patients while we await prospective randomized data.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Renais , Canadá , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Sistemas de Informação , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We updated the experience on percutaneous microwave ablation for renal cell carcinoma with five-center data and long-term follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent microwave ablation between April 2006 and December 2019. Clinicopathological and procedural data were collected. Technical effectiveness and complications were assessed, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and local neoplastic process analyses. RESULTS: A total of 323 consecutive patients (mean age, 62.9 years ± 14.0) with 371 biopsy-proved tumors (mean diameter, 2.9 cm ± 1.2) were enrolled, and 42.6% of the tumors were located adjacent to collecting system/bowel and technical effectiveness was achieved in 360 (97.0%) tumors. For 275 cT1a patients, during median follow-up time of 66.0 months (IQR, 58.4-73.6), 10-year local neoplastic processes, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 1.9%, 87.4%, 71.8, and 67.5%, respectively. For 48 cT1b patients, during the median follow-up time of 30.4 months (IQR, 17.7-44.8), 5-year local tumor progression, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 11.3%, 91.4%, 69.1, and 89.2%, respectively. Major complications showed no differences between cT1a (3.5%) and cT1b (6.9%) patients (p = 0.28). A clinical risk stratification system was developed based on multivariable model to predict DFS and CSS with c-indexes of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65-0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With matured follow-up at five institutions, ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is a reliable treatment option for cT1a renal cell carcinoma even in dangerous location and appears to be promising for cT1b tumors. KEY POINTS: ⢠To our knowledge, this is the first multicenter cohort of long-term oncologic outcomes with percutaneous MWA of cT1 RCC. ⢠The predicting model we developed is accurate to predict the long-term DFS and CSS, which can help to provide a better MWA prognostication over routinely available clinical information. ⢠The available evidence shows that microwave ablation of clinical stage T1 RCC is safe and reliable with promising long-term oncologic outcomes, especially for cT1a RCC with excellent 10-year results.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Micro-Ondas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of different volume of interest (VOI) delineation strategies on machine learning-based predictive models for discrimination between low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected 177 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC (124 low-grade; 53 high-grade). Tumor VOI was manually segmented, followed by artificially introducing uncertainties as: (i) contour-focused VOI, (ii) margin erosion of 2 or 4 mm, and (iii) margin dilation (2, 4, or 6 mm) inclusive of perirenal fat, peritumoral renal parenchyma, or both. Radiomics features were extracted from four-phase CT images (unenhanced phase (UP), corticomedullary phase (CMP), nephrographic phase (NP), excretory phase (EP)). Different combinations of four-phasic features for each VOI delineation strategy were used to build 176 classification models. The best VOI delineation strategy and superior CT phase were identified and the top-ranked features were analyzed. RESULTS: Features extracted from UP and EP outperformed features from other single/combined phase(s). Shape features and first-order statistics features exhibited superior discrimination. The best performance (ACC 81%, SEN 67%, SPE 87%, AUC 0.87) was achieved with radiomics features extracted from UP and EP based on contour-focused VOI. CONCLUSION: Shape and first-order features extracted from UP + EP images are better feature representations. Contour-focused VOI erosion by 2 mm or dilation by 4 mm within peritumor renal parenchyma exerts limited impact on discriminative performance. It provides a reference for segmentation tolerance in radiomics-based modeling for ccRCC nuclear grading. KEY POINTS: ⢠Lesion delineation uncertainties are tolerated within a VOI erosion range of 2 mm or dilation range of 4 mm within peritumor renal parenchyma for radiomics-based ccRCC nuclear grading. ⢠Radiomics features extracted from unenhanced phase and excretory phase are superior to other single/combined phase(s) at differentiating high vs low nuclear grade ccRCC. ⢠Shape features and first-order statistics features showed superior discriminative capability compared to texture features.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Aprendizado de Máquina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Rapid development of novel therapeutics in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to financial burden for patients and society. Value including clinical benefit, toxicity affecting quality of life and cost-effectiveness are a concern, prompting the need for tools to facilitate value assessment of therapeutics. This study reviews the value assessment tools, and evaluates the value of emerging therapeutics in RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two medical oncologists used American Society of Clinical Oncology value framework (ASCO VF) v2.0 and European Society for Medical Oncology-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (ESMO-MCBS) v1.1 to phase 3 trials evaluating first-line therapy in patients with metastatic RCC. Follow-up (FU) reports and extended survival data were included. Equivocal aspects and limitations of the tools were discussed. RESULTS: Six trials (COMPARZ, CheckMate 214, JAVELIN renal 101, Keynote 426, CLEAR, and CheckMate 9ER) were assessed. The control arm was standard-of-care sunitinib in all trials. ASCO VF's net health benefit, calculated as clinical benefit, toxicity and other bonus point was 11 in pazopanib, 41.9 in nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 22.4 in axitinib plus avelumab, 48.7 in axitinib plus pembrolizumab, 35.2 in lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, and 50.8 in cabozantinib plus nivolumab. A higher score means a greater treatment benefit. ESMO-MCBS gave grade 5 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 4 to pazopanib, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and cabozantinib plus nivolumab, 3 to axitinib plus avelumab or pembrolizumab. Both tools had unclear aspects to be applied to clinical practice, and should be more clearly defined, such as endpoint for determining survival benefits or how to standardize quality of life and toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: ASCO VF and ESMO-MCBS were applied to evaluate the newly emerging drugs in RCC and assessed their value. In-depth discussion by experts in various fields is required for appropriate clinical application in a real-world setting.