Comparison of Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Craniotomy for Evacuation of Subdural Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute subdural hemorrhage (ASDH) from traumatic brain injury is a life-threatening situation, often requiring surgical intervention. This meta-analysis is done to update the literature regarding the choice of procedure for the treatment of ASDH. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched from the year 2000 up to September 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) mean difference and standardized mean difference were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies comprising 4686 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled Glasgow Outcome Scale/Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were compared based on their means, with the craniotomy (CO) group having better mean scores than decompressive craniectomy (DC) (standardized mean difference -0.37, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.06, P = 0.02). The risk for poor outcomes was statistically greater in the DC group compared to the CO group (1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66, P value = 0.02). There were fewer residual subdural hematoma cases in the DC group as compared to CO (odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.73, P value < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that the ASDH patients had better functional outcomes when treated with CO as compared to DC. However, there were fewer odds of residual subdural hematoma with DC.

Cranial Repair in Children: Techniques, Materials, and Peculiar Issues.

Cranial repair in children deserves particular attention since many issues are still controversial. Furthermore, literature data offer a confused picture of outcome of cranioplasty, in terms of results and complication rates, with studies showing inadequate follow-up and including populations that are not homogeneous by age of the patients, etiology, and size of the bone defect.Indeed, age has merged in the last years as a risk factor for resorption of autologous bone flap that is still the most frequent complication in cranial repair after decompressive craniectomy.Age-related factors play a role also when alloplastic materials are used. In fact, the implantation of alloplastic materials is limited by skull growth under 7 years of age and is contraindicated in the first years if life. Thus, the absence of an ideal material for cranioplasty is even more evident in children with a steady risk of complications through the entire life of the patient that is usually much longer than surgical follow-up.As a result, specific techniques should be adopted according to the age of the patient and etiology of the defect, aiming to repair the skull and respect its residual growth.Thus, autologous bone still represents the best option for cranial repair, though limitations exist. As an alternative, biomimetic materials should ideally warrant the possibility to overcome the limits of other inert alloplastic materials by favoring osteointegration or osteoinduction or both.On these grounds, this paper aims to offer a thorough overview of techniques, materials, and peculiar issues of cranial repair in children.

Decompressive craniectomy in children: indications and outcome from a tertiary centre.

INTRODUCTION: The role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is as a rescue therapy for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. The indications for the DC are variable. METHODS: The clinical details, imaging, operative findings and follow-up data of children less than or equal to 18 years of age were reviewed for more information on the children who underwent DC in the last 5 years. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 128 children underwent DC. The trauma cases were 66, and the non-trauma cases were 62. The common indication for DC was pure acute subdural hematoma 33 (50%), followed by contusion 10 (15%) in the trauma group, and in non-trauma, arterial infarction in 20 (32%) and cerebral venous thrombosis in 17 (27%). Hemicraniectomy was done in 114 (89%), and bifrontal craniectomy was done in 7 (5.4%) cases. The median duration follow-up was 7 months in non-trauma and 6 months in trauma. GCS was less than 8, the motor score was less than 3, and pupillary asymmetry, hypotension and basal cistern effacement were factors related to an unfavourable outcome in the non-trauma group. In regression analysis, only a motor score of less than three was associated with the non-trauma group. Age less than 10 years, GCS less than 8, motor score less than three and preoperative infarction were the predictive factors in univariate analysis, and only GCS less than 8 was the predictive factor for unfavourable factors in regression analysis in the trauma group. CONCLUSION: The DC is performed as a lifesaving procedure. The unfavourable outcome is slightly higher in non-trauma cases compared to trauma cases. However, the mortality rate is high in trauma cases.

Decompressive craniotomy in split-technique (DCST) for TBI in infants: introducing a new surgical technique to prevent long-term complications.

INTRODUCTION: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is rarely required in infants. These youngest patients are vulnerable to blood loss, and cranial reconstruction can be challenging due to skull growth and bone flap resorption. On the other hand, infants have thin and flexible bone and osteogenic potential. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We propose a new technique called DCST, which makes use of these unique aspects by achieving decompression using the circumstance of the thin and flexible bone. We describe the surgical technique and the follow-up course over a period of 13 months. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In our study, DCST achieved adequate decompression and no  further repeated surgeries in accordance with decompressive craniectomy were needed afterwards.

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study in comparing decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy in patients with acute subdural hematoma.

There are two controversial surgery methods which are traditionally used: craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of DC versus craniotomy for surgical management in patients with acute subdural hemorrhage (SDH) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to July 30, 2023, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Relevant articles were reviewed, with a focus on studies comparing decompressive craniectomy to craniotomy techniques in patients with SDH following TBI. Ten studies in 2401 patients were reviewed. A total of 1170 patients had a craniotomy, and 1231 had decompressive craniectomy. The mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (OR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.42-0.5] P-value: 0.07). The rate of revision surgery was insignificantly different between the two groups (OR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.49-0.69] P-value: 0.08). No significant difference was found between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy regarding unilateral mydriasis (OR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.35-0.57] P-value < 0.001). However, the craniotomy group had significantly lower rates of non-pupil reactivity (OR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.17-0.41] P-value < 0.001) and bilateral mydriasis (OR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.5-0.66] P-value: 0.04). There was also no significant difference in extracranial injury between the two groups, although the odds ratio of significant extracranial injury was lower in the craniotomy group (OR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.45-0.7] P-value: 0.22). Our findings showed that non-pupil and bilateral-pupil reactivity were significantly more present in decompressive craniectomy. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality rate, extracranial injury, revision surgery, and one-pupil reactivity.

Long-term survival after primary decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: an observational study from 1 to 17 years.

Primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) is carried out to prevent intracranial hypertension after removal of mass lesions resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI). While primary DC can be a life-saving intervention, significant mortality risks persist during the follow-up period. This study was undertaken to investigate the long-term survival rate and ascertain the risk factors of mortality in TBI patients who underwent primary DC. We enrolled 162 head-injured patients undergoing primary DC in this retrospective study. The primary focus was on long-term mortality, which was monitored over a range of 12 to 209 months post-TBI. We compared the clinical parameters of survivors and non-survivors, and used a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust for independent risk factors of long-term mortality. For the TBI patients who survived the initial hospitalization period following surgery, the average duration of follow-up was 106.58 ± 65.45 months. The recorded long-term survival rate of all patients was 56.2% (91/162). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval = 1.12, 1.07-1.18; p < 0.01) and the status of basal cisterns (absent versus normal; odds ratio, 95% confidence interval = 9.32, 2.05-42.40; p < 0.01) were the two independent risk factors linked to long-term mortality. In conclusion, this study indicated a survival rate of 56.2% for patients subjected to primary DC for TBI, with at least a one-year follow-up. Key risk factors associated with long-term mortality were advanced age and absent basal cisterns, critical considerations for developing effective TBI management strategies.

Customised pre-operative cranioplasty to achieve maximal surgical resection of tumours with osseous involvement-a case series.

PURPOSE: Surgical resection with bony margins would be the treatment of choice for tumours with osseous involvement such as meningiomas and metastasis. By developing and designing pre-operative customised 3D modelled implants, the patient can undergo resection of meningioma and repair of bone defect in the same operation. We present a generalisable method for designing pre-operative cranioplasty in patients to repair the bone defect after the resection of tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included six patients who presented with a tumour that was associated with overlying bone involvement. They underwent placement of customised cranioplasty in the same setting. A customised implant using a pre-operative imaging was designed with a 2-cm margin to allow for any intra-operative requirements for extending the craniectomy. RESULTS: Six patients were evaluated in this case series. Four patients had meningiomas, 1 patient had metastatic breast cancer on final histology, and 1 patient was found to have an intra-osseous arteriovenous malformation. Craniectomy based on margins provided by a cutting guide was fashioned. After tumour removal and haemostasis, the cranioplasty was then placed. All patients recovered well post-operatively with satisfactory cosmetic results. No wound infection was reported in our series. CONCLUSION: Our series demonstrate the feasibility of utilising pre-designed cranioplasty for meningiomas and other tumours with osseous involvement. Following strict infection protocols, minimal intra-operative handling/modification of the implant, and close follow-up has resulted in good cosmetic outcomes with no implant-related infections.

Daily life without cranial bone protection while awaiting cranioplasty: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Decompressive craniectomy is occasionally performed as a life-saving neurosurgical intervention in patients with acute severe brain injury to reduce refractory intracranial hypertension. Subsequently, cranioplasty (CP) is performed to repair the skull defect. In the meantime, patients are living without cranial bone protection, and little is known about their daily life. This study accordingly explored daily life among patients living without cranial bone protection after decompressive craniectomy while awaiting CP. METHODS: A multiple-case study examined six purposively sampled patients, patients' family members, and healthcare staff. The participants were interviewed and the data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The cross-case analysis identified five categories: "Adapting to new ways of living," "Constant awareness of the absence of cranial bone protection," "Managing daily life requires available staff with adequate qualifications," "Impact of daily life depends on the degree of recovery," and "Daily life stuck in limbo while awaiting cranioplasty." The patients living without cranial bone protection coped with daily life by developing new habits and routines, but the absence of cranial bone protection also entailed inconveniences and limitations, particularly among the patients with greater independence in their everyday living. Time spent awaiting CP was experienced as being in limbo, and uncertainty regarding planning was perceived as frustrating. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a vulnerable group of patients with brain damage and communication impairments struggling to find new routines during a waiting period experienced as being in limbo. Making this period safe and reducing some problems in daily life for those living without cranial bone protection calls for a person-centered approach to care involving providing contact information for the correct healthcare institution and individually planned scheduling for CP.

Effectiveness of hinge craniotomy as an alternative to decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a life-threatening condition, and hematoma removal is necessary as a lifesaving procedure when the intracranial pressure is highly elevated. However, whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) or conventional craniotomy (CC) is adequate remains unclear. Hinge craniotomy (HC) is a technique that provides expansion potential for decompression while retaining the bone flap. At our institution, HC is the first-line operation instead of DC for traumatic ASDH, and we present the surgical outcomes. METHODS: From January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, 372 patients with traumatic ASDH were admitted to our institution, among whom 48 underwent hematoma evacuation during the acute phase. HC was performed in cases where brain swelling was observed intraoperatively. If brain swelling was not observed, CC was selected. DC was performed only when the brain was too swollen to allow replacement of the bone flap. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient demographics, prognosis, and subsequent cranial procedures for each technique. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients, 2 underwent DC, 23 underwent HC, and 23 underwent CC. The overall mortality rate was 20.8% (10/48) at discharge and 30.0% (12/40) at 6 months. The in-hospital mortality rates for DC, HC, and CC were 100% (2/2), 21.7% (5/23), and 13.0% (3/23), respectively. Primary brain injury was the cause of death in five patients whose brainstem function was lost immediately after surgery. No fatalities were attributed to the progression of postoperative brain herniation. In only one case, the cerebral contusion worsened after the initial surgery, leading to brain herniation and necessitating secondary DC. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of performing HC as the first-line operation for ASDH did not increase the mortality rate compared with past surgical reports and required secondary DC in only one case.

Primary decompressive craniectomy in patients with large intracerebral hematomas due to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) can alleviate increased intracranial pressure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with concomitant space-occupying intracerebral hemorrhage, but also carries a high risk for complications. We studied outcomes and complications of DC at time of ruptured aneurysm repair. METHODS: Of 47 patients treated between 2010 and 2020, 30 underwent DC during aneurysm repair and hematoma evacuation and 17 did not. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), angiographic vasospasm, DCI-related infarction, and unfavorable functional outcome (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale 1-5) at three months. Complication rates after DC and cranioplasty in the aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were compared to those of all 107 patients undergoing DC for malignant cerebral infarction during the same period. RESULTS: In DC versus no DC patients, proportions were for clinical DCI 37% versus 53% (OR = 0.5;95%CI:0.2-1.8), angiographic vasospasm 37% versus 47% (OR = 0.7;95%CI:0.2-2.2), DCI-related infarctions 17% versus 47% (OR = 0.2;95%CI:0.1-0.7) and unfavorable outcome 80% versus 88% (OR = 0.5;95%CI:0.1-3.0). ORs were similar after adjustment for baseline predictors for outcome. Complications related to DC and cranioplasty occurred in 18 (51%) of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients and 41 (38%) of cerebral infarction patients (OR = 1.7;95%CI:0.8-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and concomitant space-occupying intracerebral hemorrhage, early DC was not associated with improved functional outcomes, but with a reduced rate of DCI-related infarctions. This potential benefit has to be weighed against high complication rates of DC in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Single-centre real-life observational study on mortality and outcomes: decompressive craniectomy and brain death in traumatic brain injury, haemorrhage, and other cerebral diseases.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is used after severe brain damages with elevated, refractory intracranial pressure (ICP). In a non age-restricted population, mortality rates and long-term outcomes following DHC are still unclear. This study's objectives were to examine both, as well as to identify predictors of unfavourable outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational analysis of patients aged 18 years and older who underwent DHC at the University Hospital of Bonn between 2018 and 2020, due to traumatic brain injury (TBI), haemorrhage, tumours or infections. Patient outcomes were assessed by conducting telephone interviews, utilising questionnaires for modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and extended Glasgow Outcome scale (GOSE). We evaluated the health-related quality of life using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) scale. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients with a median age of 58.5 years (range: 18 to 85 years) were evaluated. The mortality rate was 67%, with patients passing away at a median of 6.0 days (IQR [1.9-37.6]) after DHC. Favourable outcomes, as assessed by the mRS and GOSE were observed in 10.4% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed a 2.0% increase in the mortality risk for every year of age (HR = 1.017; 95% CI [1.01-1.03]; p = 0.004). Uni- and bilateral fixed pupils were associated with a 1.72 (95% CI [1.03-2.87]; p = 0.037) and 3.97 (95% CI [2.44-6.46]; p < 0.001) times higher mortality risk, respectively. ROC-analysis demonstrated that age and pupillary reactivity predicted 6-month mortality with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI [0.69-0.84]). The only parameter significantly associated with a better quality of life was younger age. CONCLUSIONS: Following DHC, mortality remains substantial, and favourable outcomes occur rarely. Particularly in elderly patients and in the presence of clinical signs of herniation, mortality rates are notably elevated. Hence, the indication for DHC should be set critically.

Clinical impact of craniectomy on shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: A consensus on decompressive craniectomy for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has not yet been established. We aimed to investigate the development of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus based on the method of ICH surgery, with a focus on craniectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 458 patients with supratentorial ICH who underwent surgical hematoma evacuation between April 2005 and December 2021 at two independent stroke centers. Multivariate analyses were performed to characterize risk factors for postoperative shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Propensity score matching (1:2) was undertaken to compensate for group-wise imbalances based on probable factors that were suspected to affect the development of hydrocephalus, and the clinical impact of craniectomy on shunt-dependent hydrocephalus was evaluated by the matched analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 43 of the 458 participants (9.4%) underwent shunt procedures as part of the management of hydrocephalus after ICH. Multivariate analysis revealed that intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and craniectomy were associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after surgery for ICH. After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant intergroup differences in participant age, sex, hypertension status, diabetes mellitus status, lesion location, ICH volume, IVH occurrence, or IVH severity. The craniectomy group had a significantly higher incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus than the non-craniectomy group (28.9% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001; OR 9.1, 95% CI 3.7-22.7), craniotomy group (23.2% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001; OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.5-17.1), and catheterization group (20.0% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.012; OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.7-21.3). CONCLUSION: Decompressive craniectomy seems to increase shunt-dependent hydrocephalus among patients undergoing surgical ICH evacuation. The decision to perform a craniectomy for patients with ICH should be carefully individualized while considering the risk of hydrocephalus.

Complication rates after autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The reimplantation of autologous bone grafts after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is still up for debate. The objective of this study was to analyze the surgical revision rate for autologous cranioplasties in our center, aiming to identify predictors for procedure-related-complications. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted for adult patients who underwent autologous cranioplasty after DC. The primary endpoint was the complication rate in terms of surgical revision and removal of the bone graft: infection, new onset seizures, dislocation, haemorrhage, osteolysis, wound dehiscence and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula. Demographic data, medical records, surgical reports and imaging studies were analysed and risk factors for complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 169 consecutive patients were included. The median interval between DC and cranioplasty was 84 days. Mean age was 51 ± 12.4 years. 26 patients (15.3%) had revision surgery for following reasons. n = 9 implant dislocations (5.3%), n = 7 osteolysis (3.6%), n = 6 infections (3.6%), n = 5 had re-bleedings (3%), n = 5 wound dehiscences (3%), and n = 2 CSF fistulas (1.2%). 18 patients developed new seizures (10.7%). Bi- and multivariate analysis revealed three independent risk factors, simultaneous ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunting increased the risk for material dislocation (p < 0.001); large bone grafts (> 193.5 cm2) increased the risk for osteolysis (p = 0.001) and bifrontal cranioplasties were associated with higher risk for infections (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The complication rates in our study were comparable to previously reported data for autologous or artificial cranioplasties. As osteolysis was correlated to larger bone grafts, a synthetic alternative should be considered in selected cases.

Indications and scientific support for supratentorial unilateral decompressive craniectomy for different subgroups of patients: A scoping review.

CONTEXT: Even though supratentorial unilateral decompressive craniectomy (DC) has become the gold standard neurosurgical procedure aiming to provide long term relief of intractable intracranial hypertension, its indication has only been validated by high-quality evidence for traumatic brain injury and malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. This scoping review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding DC for these two recognized indications, but also for less validated indications that we may encounter in our daily clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted on Medline / Pubmed database from inception to present time looking for articles focused on 7 possible indications for DC indications. Studies' level of evidence was assessed using Oxford University level of evidence scale. Studies' quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale for systematic reviews of cohort studies and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Two randomized trials (level 1b) reported the possible efficacy of unilateral DC and the mitigated efficiency of bifrontal DC in the trauma setting. Five systematic reviews meta-analyses (level 2a) supported DC for severely injured young patients with acute subdural hematoma probably responsible for intraoperative brain swelling, while one randomized controlled trial (level 1b) showed comparable efficacy of DC and craniotomy for ASH with intraoperative neutral brain swelling. Three randomized controlled trials (level 1b) and two meta-analyses (level 1a and 3a) supported DC efficacy for malignant ischemic stroke. One systematic review (level 3a) supported DC efficacy for malignant meningoencephalitis. One systematic review meta-analysis (level 3a) supported DC efficacy for malignant cerebral venous thrombosis. The mitigated results of one randomized trial (level 1b) did not allow to conclude for DC efficacy for intracerebral hemorrhage. One systematic review (level 3a) reported the possible efficacy of primary DC and the mitigated efficacy of secondary DC for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Too weak evidence (level 4) precluded from drawing any conclusion for DC efficacy for intracranial tumors. CONCLUSION: To date, there is some scientific background to support clinicians in the decision making for DC for selected cases of severe traumatic brain injury, acute subdural hematoma, malignant ischemic stroke, malignant meningoencephalitis, malignant cerebral venous thrombosis, and highly selected cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Improved rehabilitation efficiency after cranioplasty in patients with sunken skin flap syndrome: a case series.

PURPOSE: Sunken Skin Flap Syndrome (SSFS) is an uncommon, delayed complication after craniectomy characterized by a functional plateau or decline with variable neurologic symptoms, improving after cranioplasty. SSFS negatively impacts the rehabilitation course, with subjective reports of functional improvement after cranioplasty. However, no studies have assessed the impact of cranioplasty on functional recovery rate. This case series aims to analyze SSFS manifestations and management while awaiting cranioplasty. Also, to assess the role of cranioplasty on rehabilitation outcomes and recovery rate in SSFS patients. METHODS: Four patients were identified with SSFS in inpatient rehabilitation. Each patient had unique clinical manifestations, with multiple strategies used for symptomatic control. Patients spent an average of 23 days in rehabilitation with SSFS symptoms before cranioplasty. After cranioplasty, all patients had SSFS symptom resolution. Comparing change in functional independence measure (FIM) scores and FIM efficiency pre-and post-cranioplasty rehabilitation course, a mean improvement of 23 and 0.72 occurred after cranioplasty, respectively. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of SSFS should be considered in craniectomy patients exhibiting functional decline or plateau with associated neurological symptoms. This study suggests that FIM and FIM efficiency increases in SSFS patients after cranioplasty, supporting prompt cranioplasty to improve functional outcomes and minimize rehabilitation delays.

Decompressive Craniectomy with or Without Dural Closure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Decompressive craniectomy is used to alleviate intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury and stroke by removing part of the skull to allow brain expansion. Traditionally, this procedure is followed by a watertight dural suture, although evidence supporting this method is not strong. This meta-analysis examines the feasibility of the open-dura (OD) approach versus the traditional closed-dura (CD) technique with watertight suturing. A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis were conducted on OD and CD dural closure techniques. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant trials. The primary end point was the rate of complications, with specific analyses for infection and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Mortality, poor neurological outcomes, and operation duration were also assessed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Following a comprehensive search, 930 studies were screened, from which four studies and a total of 368 patients were ultimately selected. The primary outcome analysis showed a reduced likelihood of complications in the OD group when compared with the CD group (368 patients, odds ratio 0.54 [95% CI 0.32-0.90]; I2 = 17%; p < 0.05). Specific analysis of infections and CSF leaks did not show statistically significant results, as well as the evaluation of the mortality rates and poor neurological outcome differences between groups. Assessment of operation duration, however, demonstrated a significant difference between techniques, with a mean reduction of 52.50 min favoring the OD approach (mean difference - 52.50 [95% CI - 92.13 to - 12.87]; I2 = 96%). This study supports the viability of decompressive craniectomy without the conventional time-spending watertight duraplasty closure, exhibiting no differences in the rate of infections or CSF leaks. Furthermore, this approach has been associated with improved rates of complications and faster surgery, which are important aspects of this technique, particularly in its potential to reduce both costs and procedure length.

Feasibility Study of Endoscopic Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Large Hematoma: a Comparison with Craniotomy Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with large hematomas is commonly treated with craniotomy combined with decompressive craniectomy, procedures that involve huge trauma and require subsequent cranioplasty. Recently, endoscopic surgery has shown significant promise in treating ICH, but its feasibility for large hematomas remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to compare endoscopic surgery with craniotomy and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery in treating large hematomas ICH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH and hematoma volumes exceeding 50 mL who underwent either endoscopic surgery or craniotomy. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to reduce selection bias. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery were evaluated by analyzing blood loss, postoperative edema, mortality rate, complications, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 113 cases that met the criteria were collected, with 65 in the endoscopic surgery group and 48 in the craniotomy group. After propensity score matching, each group contained 34 cases. The mean hematoma volume was 64.84 ± 11.02 mL in the endoscopy group and 66.57 ± 12.77 mL in the craniotomy group (p = 0.554). Hematoma evacuation rates were 93.27% in the endoscopy group and 89.34% in the craniotomy group (p = 0.141). The endoscopy group exhibited lower blood loss, shorter surgical time, and reduced postoperative edema volume at 24 h compared to the craniotomy group. The rate of pulmonary infection was slightly lower in the endoscopy group compared to the craniotomy group (70.59% vs. 91.18%, p = 0.031), but there were no statistically significant differences in overall complications and mortality rate between the two groups. GOS scores were similar in both groups at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surgery is safe and feasible for treating spontaneous supratentorial ICH with large hematomas, demonstrating efficacy similar to that of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy.

Cerebral Edema Monitoring and Management Strategies: Results from an International Practice Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral edema is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. However, uncertainty remains regarding best monitoring and treatment strategies, which may result in wide practice variations. METHODS: A 20-question digital survey on monitoring and management practices was disseminated between July 2022 and May 2023 to clinicians who manage cerebral edema. The survey was promoted through email, social media, medical conferences, and the Neurocritical Care Society Web site. We used the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression to report factors associated with practice variation, diagnostic monitoring methods, and therapeutic triggers based on practitioner and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: Of 321 participants from 160 institutions in 30 countries, 65% were from university-affiliated centers, 74% were attending physicians, 38% were woman, 38% had neurology training, and 55% were US-based. Eighty-four percent observed practice variations at their institutions, with "provider preference" being cited most (87%). Factors linked to variation included gender, experience, university affiliation, and practicing outside the United States. University affiliates tended to use more tests (median 3.87 vs. 3.43, p = 0.01) to monitor cerebral edema. Regarding management practices, 20% of respondents' preferred timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy was after 48 h, and 37% stated that radiographic findings only would be sufficient to trigger surgery. Fifty percent of respondents reported initiating osmotic therapy based on radiographic indications or prophylactically. There were no significant associations between management strategies and respondent or center characteristics. Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they acquired neuroimaging at intervals of 24 h or less. Within this group, attending physicians were more likely to follow this practice (65.5% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral edema monitoring and management strategies vary. Features associated with practice variations include both practitioner and institutional characteristics. We provide a foundation for understanding practice patterns that is crucial for informing educational initiatives, standardizing guidelines, and conducting future trials.

Prior Thrombectomy Does Not Affect the Surgical Complication Rate of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Patients with Malignant Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Even though mechanical recanalization techniques have dramatically improved acute stroke care since the pivotal trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant courses of ischemic stroke, decompressive hemicraniectomy remains a mainstay of malignant stroke treatment. However, it is still unclear whether prior thrombectomy, which in most cases is associated with application of antiplatelets and/or anticoagulants, affects the surgical complication rate of decompressive hemicraniectomy and whether conclusions derived from prior trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy are still valid in times of modern stroke care. METHODS: A total of 103 consecutive patients who received a decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical and functional outcomes of patients who had received mechanical recanalization before surgery (thrombectomy group, n = 49) and of patients who had not received mechanical recanalization (medical group, n = 54) were compared. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups did significantly differ regarding preoperative systemic thrombolysis (63.3% in the thrombectomy group vs. 18.5% in the medical group, p < 0.001), the rate of hemorrhagic transformation (44.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.04) and the preoperative Glasgow Coma Score (median of 7 in the thrombectomy group vs. 12 in the medical group, p = 0.04) were similar to those of prior randomized controlled trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy. There was no significant difference in the rates of surgical complications (10.2% in the thrombectomy group vs. 11.1% in the medical group), revision surgery within the first 30 days after surgery (4.1% vs. 5.6%, respectively), and functional outcome (median modified Rankin Score of 4 at 5 and 14 months in both groups) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A prior mechanical recanalization with possibly associated systemic thrombolysis does not affect the early surgical complication rate and the functional outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant ischemic stroke. Patient characteristics have not changed significantly since the introduction of mechanical recanalization; therefore, the results from former large randomized controlled trials are still valid in the modern era of stroke care.

Health-related quality of life measures in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a 6-year follow-up analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the long-term neurological outcomes and the functionality and QoL in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the 120 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI between 2002 and 2007, 101 were included based on the inclusion criteria. Long-term follow-up results (minimum 3 years) were available for 22 patients. The outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the functionality and HRQoL were assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (v2) and Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QoLIBRI) questionnaires. RESULTS: Among the patients with severe TBI, 62 (61.4%) died and 39 (38.6%) were discharged to either home or a physical therapy facility. Eleven of the thirty-nine patients could not be reached and were excluded from the final analysis. The mean GOS of the remaining 28 patients was 4.14 ± 0.8 after 6.46 ± 1.64 years of follow-up. The HRQoL was assessed in 22 of the 28 patients. The HRQoL scores were lower in patients with TBI than in healthy controls. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the HRQoL scores in patients with improved GOS scores than in those with unimproved GOS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related outcome scores could help clinicians understand the requirements of survivors of severe TBI to create a realistic rehabilitation target for them. QoLIBRI served as a good way of communication in these subjects.