Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part II diagnosis and management.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Temporary Delayed Hypersensitivity Reaction to Botulinum Toxin-A After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: The occurrence of a hypersensitivity reaction with the injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in cosmetic use is a rare complication. We report the largest case series of temporary delayed hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) with BTX-A following COVID-19 vaccination and the first cases to incobotulinum toxin A (incoBTX-A). METHODS: A retrospective multicentric case series of patients who developed a DHR to BTX-A after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated with BTX-A injections for the management of facial rhytids. The age range was between 29 and 45 years. Ten (83.3%) were female. Ten (83.3%) patients received incoBTX-A, and two received onabotulinum toxin A (onaBTX-A). All patients had COVID-19 vaccination (mRNA vaccine) between 1 and 7 months before. Within an average time of 24 h after BTX-A injection, all patients developed progressive facial swelling and erythema that were more prominent at the injection points. Intradermal allergic tests to BTX-A were performed in six (50%) patients, and the results were all negative. Adequate clinical control was achieved with systemic corticosteroids and antihistamines. After 1 year with no further vaccination, a new BTX-A treatment (provocation test) was performed in all patients with no secondary effects. CONCLUSION: Previous COVID-19 vaccination and the absence of new adverse events with further BTX-A injections suggest a temporary DHR. Clinicians should be aware of the importance of immunization history and its potential post-vaccine immunogenic effects with BTX-A. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): A tertiary care centre retrospective study.

AIMS: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare, drug-induced severe adverse reaction that usually occurs 3-6 weeks after initial exposure to certain drugs. It affects mainly adults and children to a lesser extent. Clinical features include fever, facial oedema, generalized skin rash, lymphadenopathy, haematological abnormalities and internal organ involvement. The objective was to investigate the clinical and laboratory features of patients with DRESS in our centre. METHODS: We retrospectively describe and analyse 19 cases of DRESS whose diagnosis was based on the RegiSCAR criteria (≥6 points) that occurred from January 2009 to December 2019. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 4 to 76 years (4 children/15 adults); 10 were female (52.3%). The most common culprit drugs were antibiotics (74%) and anticonvulsants (21%). The most common comorbidities were epilepsy (26%) and hypertension (26%). All patients developed cutaneous manifestations and of those, 58% presented facial oedema. Liver function tests, urea/creatinine and troponin elevation were present in 74, 32 and 42%, respectively. The median time to develop the skin rash after the drug exposure was 3.7 weeks (interquartile range 2.4-4.2 wk). Eosinophilia (≥0.7 × 109 /L) was present in 95% of the patients and peaked around 10 days after the skin manifestations. Leucocytosis and reactive lymphocytes were reported in 84% and 26% of all patients respectively. Treatment with systemic steroids was reported in 16 patients. The mean recovery time was 2 weeks (interquartile range 2-3.5 wk) and mortality was 5%. CONCLUSION: DRESS is a serious condition with significant morbidity and mortality, which requires more research for a better understanding.

Non-IgE-Mediated Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Non-IgE-mediated drug reactions have traditionally been poorly defined and studied, though they are the most common form of hypersensitivity. Their presentations are highly variable and can range in severity from mild, cutaneous-only reactions to severe systemic disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The most notable advance in non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions is in diagnostics. HLA alleles have traditionally been used for identifying certain patients at risk for abacavir hypersensitivity syndrome, but more recent studies have shown several other HLA alleles associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions with various medications. This article also highlights the use of delayed intradermal testing for radiocontrast media and patch testing for delayed antibiotic reactions. Drug reactions remain a major cause of morbidity and reason for treatment changes. Non-IgE-mediated reactions have had an increase in research interest over the past decade with an increased emphasis on better understanding the clinical presentation and underlying pathophysiology.

Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to orodispersible budesonide in a case with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease that has been known since the early 1990s. Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) belong to the therapeutic cornerstones. We describe a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to Jorveza®, a newly developed orodispersible budesonide tablet licensed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old Caucasian woman with EoE was newly treated with Jorveza®. Hours after the first intake, she felt a "strange pruritus" in the throat. This sensation worsened with each subsequent intake. On day 4 she developed oral mucosal symptoms (paresthesia of the tongue, sore and an itchy throat). Intraoral, throat and facial swellings, but no systemic reaction were observed. Patch testing using two commercial test series as well as the orodispersible budesonide tablet revealed a strong sensitization, proving a T cell mediated allergy to budesonide. CONCLUSIONS: Orodispersible budesonide is increasingly prescribed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The development of oropharyngeal symptoms after initiating should alert the treating physician to the possibility of a hypersensitivity reaction.

Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions Caused by Drug Excipients: A Literature Review.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) defines excipients as the constituents of a pharmaceutical form apart from the active substance. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) caused by excipients contained in the formulation of medications have been described. However, there are no data on the prevalence of DHRs due to drug excipients. Clinical manifestations of allergy to excipients can range from skin disorders to life-threatening systemic reactions. The aim of this study was to perform a literature review on allergy to pharmaceutical excipients and to record the DHRs described with various types of medications, specifically due to the excipients contained in their formulations. The cases reported were sorted alphabetically by type of medication and excipient, in order to obtain a list of the excipients most frequently involved for each type of medication.

Atopy Associated With Positive Patch Test and Possible Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopy is a genetic predisposition to the development of allergic reactions and the increased production of immunoglobulin E (IgE) upon exposure to environmental antigens. Clinical manifestations of atopy include asthma, atopic dermatitis (AD), and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). OBJECTIVE: To determine if cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity reactions (CDHRs) as assessed by patch testing are higher among patients with a history of atopy and with a familial predisposition to atopy. METHODS: For this study, we reviewed the patch test database of the UBC Contact Dermatitis Clinic over a 4-year time span. A personal history of asthma, AD, and ARC was recorded. In addition, a family history was obtained and manifestations of atopy in family members were noted. RESULTS: A total of 1515 patients were included in this study. Our data show that the odds ratio (OR) of a positive patch test with a personal history of atopy was 1.39, while the OR of a positive patch test with a family history of atopy was 1.69. Conversely, a personal history of respiratory atopy did not significantly affect the probability of a positive patch test, with an OR of 1.03. CONCLUSION: We conclude from our study that patients with a personal or family history of atopy have an increased risk of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). These results provide further evidence for the link between atopy and ACD and suggest that children of atopic parents should avoid potential contact allergens and would likely benefit from prophylactic emollient use.

[Epicutaneous patch testing in delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions induced by antiepileptic drugs]. / Place du patch-test dans le diagnostic des réactions d'hypersensibilités retardées induites par les antiépileptiques.

INTRODUCTION: Antiepileptic drugs are widely used and are associated with numerous side effects including skin eruptions. Epicutaneous tests have been used with variable success in skin drug reactions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the profitability of epicutaneous tests in delayed hypersensitivity reactions induced by antiepileptic drugs. METHODS: We analyzed all cases of allergic skin reactions to antiepileptic drugs notified in regional pharmacovigilance center of Sfax (Tunisia) between June 1, 2014 and April 30, 2016. The imputation score, determined using the French imputation method, should be at least doubtful. Patch-tests were performed in accordance with the general Europen network on Drug Allergy/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (ENDA/EAACI) guidelines. Patch-tests were read according to the generally accepted criteria of the International contact dermatitis research group (ICDRG). RESULTS: In our study, 20 patients were included, among which 23 events were observed. The drug involved in delayed hypersensitivity reactions was carbamazepine in 11 cases, phenobarbital in 10 cases and valproic acid in 4 cases. The clinical reactions caused by the drug were classified as maculopapular exanthema (11 cases), DRESS syndrome (6 cases), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (2 cases), fixed drug eruption (2 cases) and erythroderma (2 cases). Patch-tests were positive in 19 patients (95 %). Cross-reactivity between antiepileptic drugs was observed in 4 cases: between valproic acid and carbamazepine in 2 cases between valproic acid and phenobarbital in 1 case and between phenobarbital and carbamazepine in 1 case. CONCLUSION: In this study, patch testing was a safe and useful method in confirming the culprit drug in delayed hypersensitivity reactions induced by antiepileptic drugs.

Immunomodulatory activity of Buchholzia coriacea seed methanol extract on Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected mice.

CONTEXT: The seeds of Buchholzia coriacea Engler (Capparaceae) are used in Eastern Nigeria to treat feverish conditions, and to treat malaria and sleeping sickness that cause fever. OBJECTIVE: The current study assesses the immunomodulatory activity of Buchholzia coriacea seed extract on Trypanosoma brucei brucei infected mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Delayed hypersensitivity reaction, humoral antibody response and in-vivo leucocyte mobilization tests were assessed in three different experiments to determine the effect of the extract on immune response. Seventy-five (75) mice (25 mice per experiment) were used for the study and were each infected with 1.00 × 106 trypanosomes intra-peritoneally. Groups A, B and C were given 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg of the extract, respectively, group D received 7.5 mg/kg body weight of levamisole and group E was the control. Sheep RBCs were used as antigen. RESULTS: The acute toxicity tests did not cause clinical signs or death within 24 h post treatment at all the doses tested. The extract inhibited delayed hypersensitivity reaction by 20.9 and 20.8% at 250 and 500 mg/kg, respectively, while at 1000 mg/kg, the paw size increased (-101.9%) when compared with the control. The extract elevated the antibody titre from 1.60 ± 0.40 for control to 8.00 ± 3.58 for 500 mg/kg group. The extract increased in total leucocytes counts. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The extract has a very wide safety margin and was able to improve immune response. The results of the present study showed that Buchholzia coriacea seed methanol extract possesses immunostimulatory activity on trypanosome-infected mice.

Systemic nickel allergy after internal fixation of a bunionectomy.

Allergic reactions to implanted metals have been estimated to occur in 1% to 5% of orthopedic cases. Stainless steel screws, which contain 14% nickel, are commonly used for internal fixation in an array of podiatric procedures. We present a rare case of a systemic allergic reaction to nickel secondary to stainless steel screw fixation in a bunionectomy procedure.

Delayed allergic reaction from bupropion in a 27-year-old male with MDD: A case report and literature review.

Introduction: Bupropion is an antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), seasonal affective disorder, and smoking cessation. Nausea, headache, tremor, and insomnia are well-known adverse effects of this medication. Less well-recognized adverse effects include delayed allergic reactions, which, in some cases, can appear 2 or more weeks after bupropion initiation. Case Report: A 27-year-old male with recurrent MDD was referred for medication treatment at an outpatient mental health clinic and prescribed bupropion XL. On day 28 of treatment, he reported significant improvement in depressive symptoms and the development of itchiness and urticaria on his extremities and back. Bupropion was tapered over the course of 7 days, and he was given cetirizine 10 mg daily. He was transitioned to venlafaxine treatment and experienced complete resolution of hives and pruritus. Discussion: Despite published reports on bupropion causing delayed hypersensitivity reactions, there remains limited clinical recognition of this side effect, and the risk of underrecognition may be greater when the onset of the reaction is more than 2 weeks after bupropion initiation. Conclusion: Bupropion can cause delayed hypersensitivity reactions, including delayed pruritis and urticaria. The risk may be highest in males aged 17 to 40 years and those with a history of allergic reactions.

Bilateral purtscher-like retinopathy associated with DRESS syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: To report a case of Bilateral Purtscher-like retinopathy associated with DRESS syndrome managed with ocular and systemic treatments. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old healthy female developed multi-organ (cutaneous, hematologic, renal and hepatic) disfunction and profound vision loss 1 month after Human papillomavirus vaccine injection. At the first presentation, her visual acuity was counting fingers in both eyes. Fundus exam showed remarkable cotton-wool spots, retinal hemorrhages and macular edema. She was diagnosed DRESS syndrome and Purtscher-like retinopathy and treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, systemic steroids anticoagulants, and plasma exchange. The patient finally recovered from this life-threatening condition but left with permanent visual damage. CONCLUSION: Purtscher-like retinopathy could be complicated by DRESS syndrome which is usually considered a type IV hypersensitivity reaction.

[Multiform exudative erythema caused by hydroxychloroquine, diagnosed by epicutaneous tests: A case report]. / Eritema exudativo multiforme provocado por hidroxicloroquina, diagnosticado mediante pruebas epicutáneas: reporte de un caso.

INTRODUCTION: Multiform exudative erythema is a rare delayed hypersensitivity reaction associated with medications. The manifestations caused by hydroxychloroquine are exceptional; however, due to the increase in its prescription due to the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, adverse reactions have been exacerbated. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old female patient, who attended the Emergency Department for a picture of erythematous rash of one week of evolution, with involvement of the trunk, face and palms of the hands. Laboratory studies reported: leukocytosis with neutrophilia and lymphopenia, without eosinophilia or abnormal liver enzymes. The lesions continued to descend towards her extremities, with subsequent desquamation. She was prescribed prednisone 15 mg/24 h for three days, tapering to 10 mg/24 h, until her new assessment, in addition to antihistamines. Two days later, new macular lesions appeared in the presternal area and on the oral mucosa. Control laboratory studies did not show alterations. Skin biopsy reported: vacuolar interface dermatitis with spongiosis and parakeratosis, compatible with erythema multiforme. Epicutaneous tests were carried out with meloxicam and 30% hydroxychloroquine in water and vaseline, occluded for two days and interpreted at 48 and 96 hours, with a positive result for the latter. The diagnosis of multiform exudative erythema due to hydroxychloroquine was established. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the efficacy of patch tests in patients with delayed hypersensitivity reactions to hydroxychloroquine.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El eritema exudativo multiforme es una reacción de hipersensibilidad retardada poco frecuente asociada con medicamentos. Las manifestaciones provocadas por hidroxicloroquina son excepcionales; sin embargo, debido al incremento de su prescripción, por la reciente pandemia de SARS-CoV-2, las reacciones adversas se han exacerbado. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente femenina de 60 años, que acudió al servicio de Urgencias por un cuadro de exantema eritematoso de una semana de evolución, con afectación hacia el tronco, la cara y las palmas de las manos. Los estudios de laboratorio informaron: leucocitosis con neutrofilia y linfopenia, sin eosinofilia ni alteración de las enzimas hepáticas. Las lesiones continuaron descendiendo hacia las extremidades, con posterior descamación. Se le indicó prednisona 15 mg/24 h durante tres días, con disminución a 10 mg/24 h, hasta su nueva valoración, además de antihistamínicos. Dos días posteriores aparecieron nuevas lesiones maculares en la zona preesternal y en la mucosa oral. Los estudios de laboratorio de control no mostraron alteraciones. La biopsia cutánea informó: dermatitis de interfase vacuolar con espongiosis y paraqueratosis, compatible con eritema multiforme. Se llevaron a cabo pruebas epicutáneas con meloxicam e hidroxicloroquina al 30% en agua y vaselina, ocluidos dos días e interpretados a las 48 y 96 horas, con resultado positivo para esta última. Se estableció el diagnóstico de eritema exudativo multiforme por hidroxicloroquina. CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio confirma la eficacia de las pruebas epicutáneas en pacientes con reacciones de hipersensibilidad retardada a hidroxicloroquina.

Delayed hypersensitivity reaction following lip fillers, not one but four times in the same patient.

This case report describes a healthy 25-year-old woman who underwent lip filler augmentation and developed a delayed hypersensitivity reaction not once but four times. A Caucasian female with no medical history presented to the authors in March 2022 with diffuse painful swelling on the left upper lip. Upon examination, the affected area was soft and tender on palpation, with no palpable nodules or lumps. Five days later,the patient reported waking up with tenderness and swelling on her right upper lip this time. Two months after this incident the patient reported that she had experienced two similar incidents at the beginning of May. She again reported waking up with the same symptoms on her right upper lip, which spontaneously resolved within 48 h; and then four days later, she exhibited the same symptoms on her left upper lip. When questioned, she did not recall any flu-like symptoms or signs of COVID-19. She had been vaccinated against COVID-19, but this was long before she had lip fillers injected, namely, in 2020 (two years before the events described here). In this case, no obvious triggering factor was identified, apart from the fact that the patient had been stressed due to upcoming examination. Stress is known to cause flares of autoimmune or infectious diseases, such as herpes simplex virus, through complicated processes that influence immune function. Therefore, stress could have been the triggering factor in the current case.

A Rare Case of Delayed Hypersensitivity Following COVID-19 Booster Necessitating Treatment With Dupilumab.

Following vaccination, patients can develop symptoms of eczema flare, which could range from mild skin irritation and urticaria to diffuse skin involvement. Delayed immunologic reactions have been described in association with the novel mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. We report the case of an 83-year-old female who presented with widespread pruritic urticarial indurated papules on the arms, legs, and palms, sparing the face six months following the booster vaccine. She denied constitutional symptoms, new medications, recent illnesses, or new personal care products. Punch biopsy demonstrated acanthosis, spongiosis, and superficial and mild dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltration with occasional eosinophils compatible with a dermal hypersensitivity reaction. The patient was admitted to the hospital due to the need for systemic steroids as well as IV antibiotics secondary to a superimposed bacterial skin infection in the setting of severe itching and skin injury; she was discharged on oral steroids with follow-up to dermatology and rheumatology. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions typically peak within four days following vaccination and may be observed with COVID-19 vaccines or boosters. However, reports remain limited, and people's history of eczema should not preclude them from receiving a COVID-19 vaccine that is both safe and effective.