RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced delirium has been attributed to opioid, benzodiazepine, antipsychotic, antihistaminic and anticholinergic drug groups at therapeutic doses. Delirium also occurs in hospital-treated self-poisoning (at supra-therapeutic doses), although the causative drug classes are not well established and co-ingestion is common. We tested the magnitude and direction of association of five major drug groups with incident cases of delirium. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal cohort (n = 5131) study was undertaken of deliberate and recreational/chronic misuse poisoning cases from a regional sentinel toxicology unit. We described ingestion and co-ingestion patterns and estimated the unadjusted and adjusted odds for developing a drug-induced delirium. We also estimated the odds of drug-induced delirium being associated with three outcomes: intensive care unit admission, general hospital length of stay and discharge to home. RESULTS: Drug-induced delirium occurred in 3.9% of cases (n = 200). The unadjusted odds ratios for development of delirium were increased for anticholinergics 10.79 (5.43-21.48), antihistamines 6.10 (4.20-8.84) and antipsychotics 2.99 (2.20-4.06); non-significant for opioids 1.31 (95% confidence interval = [0.81, 2.13]); and reduced for benzodiazepines 0.37 (0.24-0.58); with little change after adjustment for age, gender and co-ingestion. Delirium was associated with intensive care unit admission, longer length of stay and discharge destination. CONCLUSION: Drug-induced delirium was uncommon in this population. Co-ingestion was common but did not alter the risk. In contrast to drug-induced delirium at therapeutic doses in older populations, opioids were not associated with delirium and benzodiazepines were protective. Drug-induced delirium required increased clinical services. Clinical services should be funded and prepared to provide additional supportive care for these deliriogenic drug group ingestions.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Delírio , Idoso , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Delírio/induzido quimicamente , Delírio/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Drug-induced delirium is known risk factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality in older patients. The objective was to evaluate the risk of drug-related delirium in older patients based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Delirium reports in older patients (age ≥65) extracted from the FAERS database using Open Vigil 2.1. The reported odds ratio and the proportional reported ratio were calculated to detect the adverse reaction signal of delirium. Combined with published evidence, suspected drugs were categorized as known, possible, or new potential delirium-risk-increasing drugs. RESULTS: Of the 130,885 reports (including 28,850 delirium events and 1,857 drugs) analyzed for this study, 314 positive signal drugs were detected. Positive signal drugs are mainly concentrated on the drug of nervous system, cardiovascular system , alimentary tract and metabolism and anti-infectives for systemic use. Of the positive signal drugs, 26.11% (82/314) were known delirium-risk increasing drugs, 44.90% (141/314) were possible and 28.98% (91/314) were new potential. CONCLUSION: Drug-induced delirium risk is prevalent in older patients, according to the FAERS. The risk level of drug-induced delirium should be taken into account to optimize drug therapy in clinical practice.
RESUMO
Drug-induced delirium is an urgent challenge of modern healthcare, especially in elderly patients, due to the widespread prevalence, associated complications, longer hospitalization period, higher mortality rate. The exact pathogenesis of delirium is unknown, however, a number of studies suggest that it is based on neurotransmitter dysfunction. Thus, drugs that affect the metabolism of these neurotransmitters can lead to the onset of delirium. The Delirium Drug Scale (DDS) and the Anticholinergic Burden scale (ACB) are used to assess the risk of delirium. For patients with an increased risk of delirium, it is recommended to avoid prescribing benzodiazepines, use with caution opiates, dihydropyridines and antagonists of H1-histamine receptors. Non-pharmacological methods are recommended as a first-line treatment of delirium (behavioral approaches, placing the patient in specially equipped delirious rooms, etc.). If non-pharmacological methods have shown to be ineffective or the patient's behavior represents a danger to the life and health of himself and / or others, it is possible to administer antipsychotic drugs.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Benzodiazepinas , Antagonistas Colinérgicos , Delírio , Idoso , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Delírio/induzido quimicamente , Hospitalização , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between polypharmacy and delirium diagnosed in elderly patients hospitalized in geriatric acute care unit after emergency hospital admission. METHODS: Study design was an observational cohort study in the acute geriatric care unit of a university hospital. We included 410 consecutive patients admitted to the acute geriatric ward during 9 months. Within 72 hours of each patient's hospitalization, a clinically trained geriatrician collected the following data: sociodemographic details (age, sex, type of residence), predisposing factors for delirium, main cause of hospitalization, and current medications. Polypharmacy was defined as 6 or more drugs a day. Delirium was assessed by a geriatrician using the Confusion Assessment Method and was diagnosed on the basis of clinical history with an acute change in usual functional status, behavioral observation, and clinical and cognitive assessment. RESULTS: Nearly 25% of hospitalized patients had delirium. The Confusion Assessment Method was positive in 69% of patients receiving polypharmacy and in 30% of those not receiving polypharmacy, a relative risk of 2.33. The proportion of elderly patients receiving polypharmacy was 58.53%. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, polypharmacy is an independent risk factor for delirium in a population of elderly patients after emergency admission. In the geriatric population, delirium is an underestimated scourge and because of its medicosocial and economic consequences and its impact on morbidity and mortality, we need to give increased attention to the prevention and control of polypharmacy, which is a predisposing factor for delirium.