Double Skull Sign After Cranioplasty: A Case Report.

The double skull sign (DSS) is a unique image on the outside of the brain that looks like two skulls. Whereas congenital and acquired types of DSS have been reported, the etiology of both of them is calcified hematomas. We encountered a case of a 46-year-old woman with a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage followed by cranioplasty at 43 years old. She developed right hemiparalysis and motor aphasia suddenly. Brain computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed not only cerebral infarction but also DSS incidentally. After detailed analysis, we concluded that the DSS in this case was not due to calcification of the hematoma but was related to the cranioplasty. In this report, we present an interesting case and discuss etiologies of the development of DSS after cranioplasty.

Epidural Fluid Collections After Cranioplasty.

Background: Common complications following cranioplasty (CP) include infections, seizures, bone flap resorption, and intra-cranial hemorrhages. Epidural fluid collections (EFCs), often seen in the immediate post-operative scan as hypo-dense accumulations below the bone flap, have been very infrequently discussed in the literature as in the majority of the cases, they are small, get resorbed spontaneously, and usually do not cause neurological deficits. Objective: To document our experience with EFCs that needed re-operation and analyze their clinical and radiological findings. Materials and Methods: We describe a series of six cases of symptomatic EFCs following CP that necessitated re-operation in a series of 89 cases over 7 years. Conclusions: EFCs following CP have a different pathogenetic mechanism compared to post-operative epidural hemorrhages. Meticulous surgical techniques can reduce their incidence. Symptomatic EFCs can be evacuated by either re-opening the flap or placing burr holes in the replaced bone. EFCs may become symptomatic even a few days after CP.

Distribution Patterns of Spinal Epidural Fluid in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Syndrome.

The aim of this study is to clarify the details of distribution patterns of spinal epidural fluid and to establish it as measure of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) syndrome diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of the spine were analyzed in 37 patients, 24 women and 13 men (mean age 46.3 years), with SIH. Detection rate, thickness and patterns of the fluid collection were evaluated at every vertebral level. Follow-up spinal MRI findings were also analyzed for changes in epidural fluid collection and association with clinical symptoms. The MR images of the cervical spine were obtained in 30 patients, the thoracic spine in 36, and the lumbar spine in 17 patients. Epidural fluid collection was detected totally in 36 patients (97%) and was predominantly found at the mid-thoracic vertebrae. The fluid tended to locate dorsal to the dural sac at the thoracic spine and ventral at the cervical and lumbar spine. Patients with shorter duration of illness tended to have thicker fluid in the thoracic spine. In follow-up MRI, the findings of epidural fluid collection has disappeared in 32/36 cases within 3 months after treatment. Although residual fluid collection was found at the thoracic level in 4 cases, clinical symptoms were improved in all patients. This study suggested that the mid-thoracic spine should be chosen as the target of MRI in screening of SIH, and enlarged dorsal epidural space is strongly indicative of SIH.

Clinical analysis of epidural fluid collection as a complication after cranioplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The epidural fluid collection (EFC) as a complication of cranioplasty is not well-described in the literature. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the development of EFC as a complication of cranioplasty, and its outcomes. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2012, 117 cranioplasty were performed in our institution. One-hundred-and-six of these patients were classified as either having EFC, or not having EFC. The two groups were compared to identify risk factors for EFC. Statistical significance was tested using the t-test and chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients undergoing cranioplasty, 59 (50.4%) suffered complications, and EFC occurred in 48 of the patients (41.0%). In the t-test and chi-test, risk factors for EFC were size of the skull defect (p=0.003) and postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space (p<0.001). In a logistic regression, the only statistically significant factor associated with development of EFC was the presence of postoperative air bubbles. The EFC disappeared or regressed over time in 30 of the 48 patients (62.5%), as shown by follow-up brain computed tomographic scan, but 17 patients (35.4%) required reoperation. CONCLUSION: EFC after cranioplasty is predicted by postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space. Most EFC can be treated conservatively. However, reoperation is necessary to resolve about a third of the cases. During cranioplasty, special attention is required when the skull defect is large, since EFC is then more likely.

Epidural fluid collection after cranioplasty : fate and predictive factors.

OBJECTIVE: Infection and bone resorption are major complications of cranioplasty and have been well recognized. However, there are few clinical series describing the epidural fluid collection (EFC) as complication of cranioplasty. This study was planned to identify the predictive factors and fate of EFC after cranioplasty. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the demographic, clinical, and radiographic data in 59 patients who underwent a first cranioplsty following decompressive craniectomy during a period of 6 years, from January 2004 to December 2009. We compared demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors between EFC group and no EFC group. The predictive factors associated with the development of EFC were assessed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 22 of 59 patients (37.3%) suffered from EFC following cranioplasty. EFC had disappeared (n=6, 31.8%) or regressed (n=6, 31.8%) over time on follow up brain computed tomographic (CT) scans. However, 5 patients (22.7%) required reoperation due to symptomatic and persistent EFC. Predictive factors for EFC were male [odds ratio (OR), 5.48; 95% CI, 1.26-23.79], air bubbles in the epidural space (OR, 12.52; 95% CI, 2.26-69.28), and dural calcification on postoperative brain CT scan (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.12-15.84). CONCLUSION: The most of EFCs could be treated by conservative therapy. Air bubble in the epidural space and dural calcification are proposed to be the predictive factors in the formation of EFC after cranioplasty.