Factors predictive of second-line chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: An analysis of the National Genomic Profiling Database.

Of the drugs used in second-line chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), trabectedin is effective for liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma (L-sarcoma), eribulin for liposarcoma, and pazopanib for non-liposarcoma. The indications for these drugs in STS other than L-sarcoma have not been established. Here we explored the prognosis, mutation profiles, and drug-response factors in STS using real-world big data. Clinicogenomic data on 1761 patients with sarcoma who underwent FoundationOne CDx were obtained from a national database in Japan. Patients with TP53 and KDM2D mutations had a significantly shorter survival period of 253 (95% CI, 99-404) and 330 (95% CI, 20-552) days, respectively, than those without mutations. Non-supervised clustering based on mutation profiles generated 13 tumor clusters. The response rate (RR) to trabectedin was highest in an MDM2-amplification cluster (odds ratio [OR]: 2.2; p = 0.2). The RR was lowest for eribulin in an MDM2-amplification cluster (OR: 0.4; p = 0.03) and highest in a TERT-mutation cluster (OR: 3.0; p = 0.03). The RR was highest for pazopanib in a PIK3CA/PTEN-wild type cluster (OR: 2.1; p = 0.03). In particular, patients harboring mutations in genes regulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway had a lower RR than patients without mutations (OR: 0.3; p = 0.04). In STS, mutation profiles were more useful in predicting the drug response than histology. The present study demonstrated the potential of tailored therapy guided by mutation profiles established by comprehensive genomic profiling testing in optimizing second-line chemotherapy for STS. The findings of this study will hopefully contribute some valuable insights into enhancing STS treatment strategies and outcomes.

A phase Ib/II study of eribulin in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that eribulin combined with cyclophosphamide (EC) would be an effective combination with tolerable toxicity for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable ABC with any number of prior lines of therapy were eligible to enroll. In the dose escalation cohort, dose level 0 was defined as eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, and dose level 1 was defined as eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Eribulin was given on days 1 and 8 and cyclophosphamide on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. In the dose expansion cohort, enrollment was expanded at dose level 1. The primary objective was clinical benefit rate (CBR), and secondary objectives were response rate (RR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were identified in the dose escalation cohort (n = 6). In the dose expansion cohort, an additional 38 patients were enrolled for a total of 44 patients, including 31 patients (70.4%) with hormone receptor-positive (HR +)/HER2- disease, 12 patients (27.3%) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 1 patient (2.3%) with HR + /HER2 + disease. Patients had a median age of 56 years (range 33-82 years), 1 prior line of hormone therapy (range 0-6), and 2 prior lines of chemotherapy (range 0-7). CBR was 79.5% (35/44; 7 partial response, 28 stable disease) and the median DOR was 16.4 weeks (range 13.8-21.1 weeks). Median PFS was 16.4 weeks (95% CI: 13.8-21.1 weeks). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (47.7%, n = 21). Fourteen of 26 patients (53.8%) with circulating tumor cell (CTC) data were CTC-positive ([Formula: see text] 5 CTC/7.5 mL) at baseline. Median PFS was shorter in patients who were CTC-positive vs. negative (13.1 vs 30.6 weeks, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: In heavily pretreated patients with ABC, treatment with EC resulted in an encouraging CBR of 79.5% and PFS of 16.4 weeks, which compares favorably to single-agent eribulin. Dose reduction and delays were primarily due to neutropenia. The contribution of cyclophosphamide to eribulin remains unclear but warrants further evaluation. NCT01554371.

Eribulin promotes proliferation of CD8+ T cells and potentiates T cell-mediated anti-tumor activity against triple-negative breast cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapeutic agents exert immunomodulatory effects on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and immune cells. Eribulin favorably affects the immunological status of patients with breast cancer. However, the effects of eribulin on the immune cells remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of eribulin on immune cells. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors and mouse splenocytes were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies. The effects of eribulin and paclitaxel on cell proliferation and differentiation status were analyzed using flow cytometry. RNA sequencing was performed to assess alterations in gene expression in CD8+ T cells following eribulin and paclitaxel treatment. Using TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, Hs578T, and MDA-MB-157), the anti-tumor activity of CD3/CD28-stimulated T cells combined with eribulin or paclitaxel was evaluated. RESULTS: Eribulin did not affect CD3/CD28-stimulated PBMCs proliferation. However, eribulin significantly decreased the CD4/CD8 ratio in T cells, indicating that eribulin facilitates CD8+ T cell proliferation. Furthermore, eribulin significantly increased the frequency of less differentiated CD45RA+, CCR7+, and TCF1+ subsets of CD8+ T cells. RNA sequencing revealed that eribulin enhanced the expression of gene sets related to cell proliferation and immune responses. Moreover, eribulin augmented the anti-tumor effects of CD3/CD28-stimulated T cells against TNBC cells. These results were not observed in experiments using paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin promoted CD8+ T cell proliferation, repressed effector T cell differentiation, and harnessed T cell-mediated anti-tumor effects. These mechanisms may be one of the cues that eribulin can improve the immunological status of tumor-bearing hosts.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients treated with eribulin after prior phosphoinositide 3-Kinase inhibitor treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration approved eribulin for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Since then, the treatment landscape has evolved with many new therapy classes, a more recent one being the small molecule inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K). We sought to characterize the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with MBC who received eribulin following prior treatment with a PI3K inhibitor. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on medical record review included MBC patients who initiated eribulin between March 2019 and September 2020 following prior treatment with a PI3K inhibitor was conducted. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from the initiation of eribulin therapy using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: 82 eligible patients were included. Patients' median age at eribulin initiation was 62 years; 86.5% had hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors. Eribulin was most often administered in the second or third line (82.9%) in the metastatic setting. Best overall response on eribulin was reported as complete or partial response in 72% of the patients. The median rwPFS was 18.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4-not estimable); median OS was not reached. The estimated rwPFS and OS rates at 12 months were 63.3% (95% CI, 50.5-73.7) and 82.6% (95% CI, 72.4-89.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our real-world study suggests that eribulin may be a potential treatment option for MBC patients who fail a prior PI3K inhibitor.

Effect of eribulin on epithelial-mesenchymal transition plasticity in metastatic breast cancer: An exploratory, prospective study.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in cancer metastasis and treatment resistance, which worsens prognosis. In phase III trials, eribulin improved overall survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. In preclinical studies, eribulin suppressed EMT. However, clinical data on the use of eribulin for MBC patients are limited. In this exploratory, prospective study, we examined the effect of eribulin on EMT in MBC patients. Twenty-two patients aged 44-82 years with recurrent breast cancer or MBC were treated with eribulin. Breast cancer tissue samples were obtained before treatment and on Day 15 ± 5 of the first cycle of eribulin treatment. EMT markers (E-cadherin, claudin-3, vimentin, and N-cadherin) were analyzed using western blotting. EMT changes were evaluated based on the ratio of epithelial to mesenchymal markers before and after treatment in individual tumors. E-cadherin/vimentin, claudin-3/vimentin, E-cadherin/N-cadherin, and claudin-3/N-cadherin ratios were significantly higher after treatment (p = .007, p = .005, p = .006, and p = .011, respectively). Based on E-cadherin/vimentin, 65.0% of tumors shifted to an epithelial phenotype, as compared to 66.7% based on claudin-3/vimentin, 84.6% based on E-cadherin/N-cadherin, and 71.4% based on claudin-3/N-cadherin ratios. Thus, our results showed that eribulin suppressed EMT in breast cancer tissues.

Results of a Phase Ib Study Investigating Durvalumab in Combination with Eribulin in Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The release of tumor-associated antigens with cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment may enhance the response to immune checkpoint blockade. Eribulin is a microtubule inhibitor with proven overall survival (OS) benefit in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which may also enhance intratumoral vascular remodeling. Durvalumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, targets the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) receptor. This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of eribulin in combination with durvalumab, as well as the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination in patients with previously treated HER2-negative (HER2-) MBC and recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). METHODS: Cohorts of 3-6 patients with HER2- MBC and ROC were treated in a modified 3+3 design. Eligible patients received escalating doses of eribulin (1.1 mg/m2 or 1.4 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and day 8) with durvalumab (1.12 g IV on day 1) in 21-day cycles until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), intolerable adverse events (AEs), disease progression, or other reasons for withdrawal. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: the rate of DLTs during cycles 1 and 2 of therapy. Secondary endpoints: AE rate, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. RESULTS: Nine patients with a median of 4 prior therapies for advanced disease were treated: 5 patients with HER2- MBC (1 with triple-negative disease and 4 with hormone-positive disease) and 4 patients with ROC. The RP2D of eribulin was 1.4 mg/m2 in combination with durvalumab. There were no DLTs experienced during the first two cycles of therapy. The most common treatment-related AEs (>50%) were fatigue, neutropenia, decreased white blood cell count, anemia, AST and alkaline phosphatase elevation, hyperglycemia, and nausea; most were grade 1 or 2. There was one immune-related AE of grade 3 (hepatitis) after 5 cycles of treatment, for which patient came off study. Two other patients discontinued study drug related to toxicity (neutropenia [n = 1], hepatic toxicity [n = 1]). ORR was 55%, and 4 additional patients experienced stable disease. All MBC patients exhibited a response to therapy. Median PFS was 6.2 months. Median OS was 15.0 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of eribulin at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 with standard dose durvalumab had a favorable AE profile in patients with previously treated HER2- MBC and ROC. The early antitumor activity observed in all MBC patients enrolled in the study suggests that further investigation of this combination is warranted.

Eribulin for patients with metastatic extramammary Paget disease: Study protocol for a single-arm phase II trial.

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare cutaneous malignancy that predominantly affects the anogenital areas of the elderly. Although the efficacy of docetaxel and other cytotoxic agents for advanced EMPD has been reported in small retrospective case studies, no treatment has been proven effective in prospective clinical trials. We established the world's first in vivo EMPD experimental model (a patient-derived xenograft model). In our treatment experiment, xenograft tumours showed a remarkable response to eribulin. This study evaluates the efficacy of eribulin for patients with advanced EMPD. In October 2022, we started a single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of eribulin as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable EMPD with measurable lesions. Enrolment in this clinical trial is open to patients with any prior treatment for EMPD. The primary endpoint is overall response rate; the secondary endpoints include disease control rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hokkaido University and the other collaborating institutions. If the primary endpoint is met, it is our hope that eribulin will be regarded as a standard medication for patients with advanced EMPD.

Monitoring trends in the absolute lymphocyte count and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer receiving eribulin.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are related to the outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving specific chemotherapies. However, the reports have focussed on the initial blood test and there is a lack of evidence or data to support that dynamic changes of ALC or NLR are associated with the patients' survival outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records from patients with breast cancer treated with eribulin from 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Blood test data were available prior to starting eribulin (baseline), and at 1, 3 and 6 months after initiating eribulin. We classified the patients into ALC and NLR high and low groups using the following cut-offs: 1000/µl for ALC and 3 for NLR. We defined ALC and NLR trends as increasing or decreasing compared with the initial data. We assessed the associations between the ALC and NLR with progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: There were 136 patients with breast cancer treated with eribulin. Of these patients, 60 had complete blood tests and follow-up data. Neither a high ALC nor a low baseline NLR was associated with the survival outcome. One month after initiating eribulin treatment, a high ALC and a low NLR were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (p = 0.044 for each). Three months after initiating eribulin, a high ALC was significantly associated with better overall survival (p = 0.006). A high NLR at 3 or 6 months after initiating eribulin was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.017 and p = 0.001, respectively). The ALC and NLR trends across times were not associated with survivals. CONCLUSION: We showed that 1, 3 and 6 months after initiating eribulin, a high ALC and a low NLR may be related to the patients' survival outcomes. The ALC and NLR trends were not associated with survival. Accordingly, we believe patients who maintain a high ALC and a low NLR may have better clinical outcomes after initiating eribulin.

Cost-benefit evaluation of advanced therapy lines in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is responsible for 10-20% cases of breast cancer and is resulting in rising healthcare costs. Thus, health-economic evaluations are needed to relate clinical outcomes and costs of treatment options and to provide recommendations of action from a health-economic perspective. METHODS: We investigated the cost-benefit-ratio of approved treatment options in metastatic TNBC in Germany by applying the efficiency frontier approach. These included sacituzumab-govitecan (SG), eribulin, vinorelbine, and capecitabine. Clinical benefit was measured as (i) median overall survival (mOS) and (ii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in terms of time to symptom worsening (TSW). To assess medical benefits, literature was systematically reviewed in PubMed for (i) and (ii), respectively. Treatment costs were calculated considering annual direct outpatient treatment costs from a statutory healthcare payer perspective. It was intended that both, (i) and (ii), yield an efficiency frontier. RESULTS: Annual direct outpatient treatment costs amounted to EUR 176,415.21 (SG), EUR 47,414.14 (eribulin), EUR 13,711.35 (vinorelbine), and EUR 3,718.84 (capecitabine). Systematic literature review of (i) and statistical analysis resulted in OS values of 14.3, 9.56, 9.44, and 7.46 months, respectively. Capecitabine, vinorelbine, and SG are part of the efficiency frontier including OS. The highest additional benefit per additional cost was determined for vinorelbine, followed by SG. Systematic review of (ii) revealed that no TSW data of TNBC patients receiving vinorelbine were available, preventing the presentation of an efficiency frontier including HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine is most cost-effective, followed by SG. Health-economic evaluations support decision-makers to assess treatment options within one indication area. In Germany, the efficiency frontier can provide decision support for the pricing of innovative interventions. Results of our analysis may thus guide reimbursement determination.

The effects of the combination of temozolomide and Eribulin on T98G human glioblastoma cell line: an ultrastructural study.

Glioblastoma tumors are the most aggressive primary brain tumors that develop resistance to temozolomide (TMZ). Eribulin (ERB) exhibits a unique mechanism of action by inhibiting microtubule dynamics during the G2/M cell cycle phase. We utilized the T98G human glioma cell line to investigate the effects of ERB and TMZ, both individually and in combination. The experimental groups were established as follows: control, E5 (5 nM ERB), T0.75 (0.75 mM TMZ), T1 (1.0 mM TMZ), and combination groups (E5+T0.75 and E5+T1). All groups showed a significant decrease in cell proliferation. Apoptotic markers revealed a time-dependent increase in annexin-V expression, across all treatment groups at the 48-hour time point. Caspase-3, exhibited an increase in the combination treatment groups at the 48-hour mark. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed normal ultrastructural features in the glioma cells of the control group. However, treatments induced ultrastructural changes within the spheroid glioblastoma model, particularly in the combination groups. These changes included a dose-dependent increase in autophagic vacuoles and apoptotic morphology of the cells. In conclusion, the similarity in the mechanism of action between ERB and TMZ suggests the potential for synergistic effects when combined. Our results highlight that this combination induced severe damage and autophagy in glioma spheroids after 48 hours.

Eribulin is an immune potentiator in breast cancer that upregulates human leukocyte antigen class I expression via the induction of NOD-like receptor family CARD domain-containing 5.

Eribulin inhibits microtubule polymerization and improves the overall survival of patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer. A subgroup analysis revealed a low neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (<3) to be a prognostic factor of eribulin treatment. We thus hypothesized that eribulin might be related to the immune response for breast cancer cells and we analyzed the effects of eribulin on the immune system. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression was increased in clinical samples after eribulin treatment. In vitro assays revealed that eribulin treatment increased HLA class I expression in breast cancer line cells. RNA-sequencing demonstrated that eribulin treatment increased the expression of the NOD-like family CARD domain-containing 5 (NLRC5), a master regulator of HLA class I expression. Eribulin treatment increased the NY-ESO-1-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) transduced T (TCR-T) cell response for New York oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1) overexpressed breast cancer cells. The eribulin and TCR-T combined therapy model revealed that eribulin and immunotherapy using TCR-T cells has a synergistic effect. In summary, eribulin increases the expression of HLA class 1 via HLA class 1 transactivatior NLRC5 and eribulin combination with immunotherapy can be effective for the treatment of breast cancer.

Phase 1b study of combined selinexor and eribulin for the treatment of advanced solid tumors and triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Selinexor (KPT-330) is a potent inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in turn inhibiting tumor growth. Selinexor enhances the antitumor efficacy of eribulin in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro and in vivo. Given the unmet medical need in TNBC and sarcoma, the authors explored the safety and efficacy of this combination. METHODS: The authors conducted a phase 1b trial of combined selinexor and eribulin using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in patients who had advanced solid tumors and in those who had TNBC in a dose-expansion cohort. RESULTS: Patients with TNBC (N = 19), sarcoma (N = 9), and other cancers (N = 3) were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort (N = 10) and in the dose-expansion cohort (N = 21). The median number lines of prior therapy received was four (range, from one to seven prior lines). The most common treatment-related adverse events for selinexor were nausea (77%), leukopenia (77%), anemia (68%), neutropenia (68%), and fatigue (48%). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the first dose level with prolonged grade 3 neutropenia. The recommended phase 2 dose was 80 mg of selinexor orally once per week and 1 mg/m2 eribulin on days 1 and 8 intravenously every 3 weeks. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10% in three patients. In the dose-escalation cohort, the ORR was 10%, whereas six patients with had stable disease. In the TNBC dose-expansion cohort (n = 18), ORR was 11%, and there were two confirmed partial responses with durations of 10.8 and 19.1 months (ongoing). CONCLUSIONS: Selinexor and eribulin had an acceptable toxicity profile and modest overall efficacy with durable responses in select patients. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Effective therapies for advanced, triple-negative breast cancer and sarcoma represent an unmet need. Exportin 1 is associated with the transport of cancer-related proteins. Preclinical studies have demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and enhanced tumor sensitivity in patients who receive selinexor combined with eribulin. In this phase 1b study, the authors evaluated the safety profile and clinical activity of the combination of selinexor, a potent oral inhibitor of exportin 1, and eribulin in patients with advanced cancers enriched for triple-negative breast cancer or sarcoma. The combination was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible, and managed with dose modifications or growth factor support. The combination of selinexor and eribulin produced an antitumor response, particularly in some patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This work lays the foundation for prospective investigations of the role of selinexor and eribulin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Incidence and Resolution of Eribulin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (IRENE) in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Eribulin, a halichondrin-class microtubule dynamics inhibitor, is a preferred treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer who have been pretreated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common side effect of chemotherapies for breast cancer and other tumors. The Incidence and Resolution of Eribulin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (IRENE) noninterventional postauthorization safety study assessed the incidence and severity of PN in patients with breast cancer treated with eribulin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IRENE is an ongoing observational, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, cohort study. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and disease progression after 1-2 prior chemotherapeutic regimen(s) for advanced disease were treated with eribulin. Patients with eribulin-induced PN (new-onset PN or worsening of preexisting PN) were monitored until death or resolution of PN. Primary endpoints included the incidence, severity, and time to resolution of eribulin-induced PN. Secondary endpoints included time to disease progression and safety. RESULTS: In this interim analysis (data cutoff date: July 1, 2019), 67 (32.4%) patients experienced any grade eribulin-induced PN, and 12 (5.8%) patients experienced grade ≥3 eribulin-induced PN. Median time to resolution of eribulin-induced PN was not reached. Median time to disease progression was 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.5). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 195 (93.8%) patients and serious TEAEs occurred in 107 (51.4%) patients. CONCLUSION: The rates of any grade and grade ≥3 eribulin-induced PN observed in this real-world study were consistent with those observed in phase III randomized clinical trials. No new safety findings were observed.

Phase II trial of biweekly administration with eribulin after three cycles of induction therapy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (JACCRO BC-03).

PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is usually incurable; treatment aims to maximize patients' function and quality of life (QOL). Eribulin is a standard treatment in patients with MBC pretreated with anthracycline and taxane; however, the best administration schedule is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective phase II trial of patients with luminal MBC, we administered biweekly eribulin to patients who completed a three-cycle induction treatment. RESULTS: Sixty patients with hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative MBC were enrolled; 40 obtained stable disease (SD) or better efficacy after induction therapy, after which they were switched to biweekly maintenance administration. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who switched to maintenance therapy was 15.21 weeks (95% CI 9.71-22.14), starting on the first day of maintenance therapy. Overall survival (OS) in patients who switched to maintenance therapy was 21.39 months (95% CI 18.89-32.89). PFS and OS in the whole population starting from the registration date were 19.00 weeks (95% CI 17.00-25.00) and 21.52 months (95% CI 16.23-24.25), respectively. PFS from the enrollment date for patients who received maintenance therapy was 25.29 weeks (95% CI 19.14-32.14). Patients who achieved complete response or partial response during induction therapy had significantly longer PFS compared to patients with SD. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of biweekly administration of eribulin at maintenance was nonsignificant. However, less frequent visits are convenient, and reduced dose intensity improves safety. Biweekly administration, besides dose reduction, could be an acceptable option for patients who are unable to maintain a standard regimen.

Baseline interleukin-6 is a prognostic factor for patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin.

PURPOSE: Eribulin is a unique anti-cancer drug which can improve overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), probably by modulating the tumor immune microenvironment. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of serum levels of immune-related and inflammatory cytokines in patients treated with eribulin. Furthermore, we investigated the association between cytokines and immune cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and cytotoxic and regulatory T cells, to explore how these cytokines might affect the immune microenvironment. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with MBC treated with eribulin were recruited for this retrospective study. The relationship of cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, to progression-free survival and OS was examined. CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte, MDSCs and regulatory T cell levels were determined in the blood by flow cytometry analysis. RESULTS: In our cohort, patients with high IL-6 at baseline had shorter progression-free survival and OS compared with those with low IL-6 (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0012, respectively). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that baseline IL-6 was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.0058). Importantly, CD8+ lymphocytes were significantly lower and MDSCs were significantly higher in patients with high IL-6, compared to those with low IL-6. CONCLUSION: Baseline IL-6 is an important prognostic factor in patients with MBC treated with eribulin. Our results show that high IL-6 is associated with higher levels of MDSCs which suppress anti-tumor immunity, such as CD8+ cells. It appears that eribulin is not particularly effective in patients with high IL-6 due to a poor tumor immune microenvironment.

Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogenous malignancies with a poor prognosis in advanced disease stages. Eribulin is used in metastatic liposarcoma (LPS) patients, who have failed first-line chemotherapy and has been approved for use in patients with LPS in the USA and Europe due to its efficacy in this histological subtype in a phase 3 trial. We have evaluated efficacy and tolerability of eribulin in LPS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) patients in the routine clinical setting at our department. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center analysis, efficacy and safety of eribulin were retrospectively evaluated in advanced LPS and LMS patients at the Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna. RESULTS: A total of 32 adult patients treated with eribulin were identified and included in this analysis. Overall response rate was 9.4% for all patients, with one patient with LPS and two patients with LMS showing a partial response. Disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) for all patients was 50% (LPS: 47.1%; LMS 53.3%). No statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival and overall survival was detected between patients with LPS and LMS (p = 0.807 and p = 0.519, respectively). Patients with LMS (n = 2) had received fewer previous therapy lines than patients with LPS (n = 14) (≤ previous treatment lines, p < 0.001). Toxicity was generally manageable, and grade 3 + 4 events were rare. CONCLUSION: The activity and tolerability of eribulin in LPS as in well in LMS patients in the routine clinical setting is comparable to outcomes reported in published phase 3 trials.

Protocol for the 2ND-STEP study, Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1802: a randomized phase II trial of second-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma comparing trabectedin, eribulin and pazopanib.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare type of malignancy comprising a variety of histological diagnoses. Chemotherapy constitutes the standard treatment for advanced STS. Doxorubicin-based regimens, which include the administration of doxorubicin alone or in combination with ifosfamide or dacarbazine, are widely accepted as first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. Trabectedin, eribulin, pazopanib, and gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD), which is the empirical standard therapy in Japan, are major candidates for second-line chemotherapy for advanced STS, although clear evidence of the superiority of any one regimen is lacking. The Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) conducts this trial to select the most promising regimen among trabectedin, eribulin, and pazopanib for comparison with GD as the test arm regimen in a future phase III trial of second-line treatment for patients with advanced STS. METHODS: The JCOG1802 study is a multicenter, selection design, randomized phase II trial comparing trabectedin (1.2 mg/m2 intravenously, every 3 weeks), eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks), and pazopanib (800 mg orally, every day) in patients with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to doxorubicin-based first-line chemotherapy. The principal eligibility criteria are patients aged 16 years or above; unresectable and/or metastatic STS; exacerbation within 6 months prior to registration; histopathological diagnosis of STS other than Ewing sarcoma, embryonal/alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma; prior doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for STS, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-control rate, response rate, and adverse events. The total planned sample size to correctly select the most promising regimen with a probability of > 80% is 120. Thirty-seven institutions in Japan will participate at the start of this trial. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial to evaluate trabectedin, eribulin, and pazopanib as second-line therapies for advanced STS. We endeavor to perform a subsequent phase III trial comparing the best regimen selected by this study (JCOG1802) with GD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( jRCTs031190152 ) on December 5, 2019.

Predictive value of peripheral blood markers in soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with eribulin.

OBJECTIVE: eribulin, an anticancer agent that inhibits microtubule growth, along with trabectedin and pazopanib, has been approved for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, there has been no consensus on the optimal second-line therapy among these three agents following treatment failure with doxorubicin. Recently, the effects of eribulin on the tumor microenvironment and immunity have been reported in breast cancer, and peripheral blood immune markers have also been reported to be a predictor of eribulin efficacy, though this remains unverified in STS. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of various peripheral blood immune markers in STS patients treated with eribulin. METHODS: we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of STS patients treated with eribulin and examined whether peripheral blood immune markers at different time points could be prognostic factors for STS patients treated with eribulin. RESULTS: several peripheral blood immune markers were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS), specifically neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) prestart (NLR before the initial administration of eribulin) (P = 0.019) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)8D (ALC on Day 8 of the first administration of eribulin) (P = 0.037). NLR prestart (P = 0.001) was significantly associated with overall survival. The combination of NLR prestart and ALC8D determined the PFS of STS patients treated with eribulin. CONCLUSIONS: the combined indicator of low NLR prestart and high ALC8D predicted the survival of patients treated with eribulin as well as the histology of L-sarcoma. Though further validation was needed, this finding would provide valuable prognostic factor that help treatment decision in the absence of consensus on the optimal second-line therapy following doxorubicin treatment in STS patients.

Does the Timing of Eribulin Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Matter? Evidence from a Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of eribulin used as an early-line (EL, i.e., first-/second-line) versus late-line (LL, i.e., third-line and beyond) chemotherapy for recurrent advanced or metastatic breast cancer (A/MBC) patients. METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective observation of A/MBC patients initiating eribulin between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, using medical database at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Taiwan. Patients were assigned into either the EL or LL group based on the timing of respective eribulin treatments and were observed for at least 6 months up to December 2019 for progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), disease response, and occurrence of adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 127 patients, 23.6% (n = 30) and 76.4% (n = 97) were assigned to the EL and LL groups, respectively, between which no difference in patient characteristics was noted. Median PFS and TTF were 6.5 months and 5.0 months for the EL and 4.2 months and 3.4 months for the LL, respectively. Median OS could not be estimated in the EL group and was 20.5 months in the LL group. Eribulin as an EL treatment was the only factor associated with longer TTF and OS, whereas the number of metastatic sites was additionally associated with PFS in the multivariate analysis. No complete response was reported in either group, but a partial response was obtained in 6.7% in the EL group and 3.1% in the LL group. The common adverse events between two groups were similar, including leukopenia (80.0%), neutropenia (76.7%), and anemia (60.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The eribulin used as an EL of chemotherapy was effective for A/MBC patients with known toxicities in this study, while eribulin as the LL chemotherapy showed consistent results with previous reports.

Tolerability of Eribulin and correlation between polymorphisms and neuropathy in an unselected population of female patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the multicenter, single arm, phase IV PAINTER study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and its treatment focuses on prolonging patients' (pts) overall survival (OS) and improving their quality of life. Eribulin is a microtubule inhibitor that increases OS in pre-treated MBC pts. The most common adverse events (AEs) are asthenia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy (PN). METHODS: PAINTER is a single arm, phase IV study, aimed at evaluating the tolerability of eribulin in MBC pts. Secondary objectives were the description of treatment efficacy and safety, the assessment of the incidence and severity of PN and its association with genetic polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples and 15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped by Taqman specific assays. The association between PN and SNPs were evaluated by Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Starting from May 2014 until June 2018 180 pts were enrolled in this study by 20 Italian centers. 170 of these pts could be evaluated for efficacy and toxicity and 159 for polymorphisms analysis. The median age of pts was 60 years old and the biological subtypes were luminal type (64.7%), Her2 positive (18.3%) and triple negative (17%). Pts were pretreated with a median of 5 lines for MBC. The median follow up of this study was 15.4 months with a median number of 4.5 cycles administered (minimum-maximum 1-23). The median overall survival was 12 months. 48.8% of pts experienced a dose reduction, mainly for neutropenia (23.9%) and liver toxicity (12%). 65 pts (38.2%) reported at least one severe toxicity. Neutropenia and neurotoxicity were the most frequent severe AEs (15.3% and 14.7%, respectively); other reported toxicities were osteo-muscular, abdominal or tumor site pain (19.4%), liver toxicity (6.6%), pulmonary toxicity (6.5%) and dermatological toxicity (3.6%). Among the 15 evaluated SNPs, an association with PN was found for rs2233335 and rs7214723. CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin is a well-tolerated treatment option in MBC. Schedule and dosage modifications were common, but toxicity rarely led to treatment discontinuation. SNPs rs2233335 (G/T and T/T) in the NDRG1 gene and rs7214723 (CC and CT) in the CAMKK1 gene were associated with PN. These findings, if validated, could allow a tailored treatment with eribulin in cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02864030.