Insights into Factors Affecting Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymer Crystallinity in Islatravir Implant.

Islatravir, a highly potent nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) for the treatment of HIV, has great potential to be formulated as ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer-based implants via hot melt extrusion. The crystallinity of EVA determines its physical and rheological properties and may impact the drug-eluting implant performance. Herein, we describe the systematic analysis of factors affecting the EVA crystallinity in islatravir implants. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on EVA and solid-state NMR revealed drug loading promoted EVA crystallization, whereas BaSO4 loading had negligible impact on EVA crystallinity. The sterilization through γ-irradiation appeared to significantly impact the EVA crystallinity and surface characteristics of the implants. Furthermore, DSC analysis of thin implant slices prepared with an ultramicrotome indicated that the surface layer of the implant was more crystalline than the core. These findings provide critical insights into factors affecting the crystallinity, mechanical properties, and physicochemical properties of the EVA polymer matrix of extruded islatravir implants.

Development and characterization of 3D printed ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) as drug delivery device for the treatment of overactive bladder.

The overactive bladder is a condition characterized by a sudden urge to urinate, even with small volumes of urine present in the bladder. The current treatments available for this pathology consist on conservative approaches and the continuous administration of drugs, which when made by conventional methods has limitations related to the first pass metabolism, bioavailability, severe side effects, and low patient adherence to treatments, ultimately leading to low effectiveness. Within this context, the present work proposes the design, manufacture, and characterization of an intravesical implant for the treatment of overactive bladder pathology, using EVA copolymer as a matrix and oxybutynin as a drug. The fabrication of devices through two manufacturing techniques (extrusion and additive manufacturing by fused filament fabrication, FFF) and the evaluation of the implants through characterization tests was proposed. The usability and functionality were evaluated through simulated insertion of the device/prototype in a bladder model through catheter insertion tests. The safety and effectiveness of the devices was investigated from mechanical testing as well as drug release assays. Drug release assays presented a burst release in the first 24 h, followed by a release of 1.8 and 2.8 mg/d, totalizing 32 d. Mechanical tests demonstrated an increase in the stiffness of the specimens due to the addition of the drug, showing a change in maximum stress and strain at break. The released dose was higher than that usually presented when considering the oral administration route, showing the optimization of the development of this implant has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients with overactive bladder.

Enhancing mouthguard longevity: Impact of surface treatment against aging from brushing and disinfectant exposure.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The study aimed to assess the surface characteristics of sports mouthguards under mechanical stresses during cleaning, either by brushing or immersion in disinfectant solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ethylene-vinyl acetate samples, 4 mm thick, were randomly assigned to cleaning methods: control (C-no cleaning), brushing with water (B.W), brushing with neutral liquid soap (B.S), brushing with toothpaste (B.T), immersion in distilled water for 10 min (I.W), immersion in 2.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min (I.SH), and immersion in sodium bicarbonate solution for 5 min (I.SB). All cleaning methods were applied for 28 days. Surface roughness average (Ra) and wettability were measured at baseline for the control group (n = 9), and after cleaning for all the other groups. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA with Tukey tests (5% significance) indicated significant differences among groups (p < .05). The I.SB group had higher surface roughness than B.S and B.T (p < .05). B.W showed the lowest wettability, significantly lower than B.T, I.W, and I.SB (p < .05). I.SB exhibited the highest wettability, significantly different from sodium hypochlorite, neutral liquid soap, brushing with water, and control groups (p < .05). The sodium bicarbonate immersion group (I.SB) demonstrated greater statistical variation, displaying higher susceptibility to aging compared to brushing with neutral liquid soap. CONCLUSION: Cleaning mouthguards with a toothbrush, water, and neutral liquid soap emerged as the most promising method, causing minimal surface changes in the material.

Adaptation and Biomechanical Performance of Custom-Fit Mouthguards Produced Using Conventional and Digital Workflows: A Comparative In Vitro Strain Analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of different models for the fabrication of custom-fit mouthguards (MTGs) can affect their final thickness, adaptation, and shock-absorption properties. This study aimed to evaluate the adaptation, thickness, and shock absorption of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) thermoplastic MTGs produced using conventional plaster or three-dimensional (3D) printed models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A typical model with simulated soft gum tissue was used as the reference model to produce MTGs with the following two different protocols: plast-MTG using a conventional impression and plaster model (n = 10) and 3DPr-MTG using a digital scanning and 3D printed model (n = 10). A custom-fit MTG was fabricated using EVA sheets (Bioart) plasticized over different models. The MTG thickness (mm), internal adaptation (mm) to the typodontic model, and voids in the area (mm2) between the two EVA layers were measured using cone-beam computed tomography images and Mimics software (Materialize). The shock absorption of the MTG was measured using a strain-gauge test with a pendulum impact at 30° with a steel ball over the typodont model with and without MTGs. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements, followed by Tukey's post hoc tests. RESULTS: The 3DPr-MTG showed better adaptation than that of the Plast-MTG at the incisal/occlusal and lingual tooth surfaces (p < 0.001). The 3DPr-MTG showed a thickness similar to that of the Plast-MTG, irrespective of the measured location. MTGs produced using both model types significantly reduced the strain values during horizontal impact (3DPr-MTG 86.2% and Plast-MTG 87.0%) compared with the control group without MTG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The MTGs showed the required standards regarding thickness, adaptation, and biomechanical performance, suggesting that the number and volume of voids had no significant impact on their functionality. Three-dimensional printed models are a viable alternative for MTG production, providing better adaptation than the Plast-MTG at the incisal/occlusal and lingual tooth surfaces and similar performance as the MTG produced with the conventional protocol.

Effect of different materials for conventional and 3D-printed models on the mechanical properties of ethylene-vinyl acetate utilized for fabricating custom-fit mouthguards.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The interaction between the ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) with distinct materials utilized for obtaining dental models can affect the performance of resulting mouthguards. This study attempted to evaluate the effect of different materials for conventional (dental stone) or 3D-printed (resin) models on EVA's physical and mechanical properties and surface characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: EVA sheets (Bioart) were laminated over four model types: GIV, conventional Type IV dental stone model (Zhermak); ReG, resin-reinforced Type IV dental stone model (Zero Stone); 3DnT, 3D resin printed model (Anycubic) without surface treatment; 3DT, 3D-printed model (Anycubic) with water-soluble gel (KY Jelly Lubricant, Johnson & Johnson) coating during post-curing process. The EVA specimens were cut following the ISO 37-II standard (n = 30). Shore A hardness was measured before and after plasticization on the contact (internal) or opposite (external) surfaces with the model. The breaking force (F, N), elongation (EL, mm), and ultimate tensile strength (UTS, MPa) were measured using a universal testing machine. Macro-photography and scanning electron microscopy were adopted for classifying the EVA surface alteration. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by Tukey's test (α = .05). RESULTS: Plasticization significantly decreased Shore A values for the tested EVA regardless of the model type (p < .001). Higher F, El, and UTS values were verified for the EVA with 3DT and GIV models compared to ReG and 3DnT (p < .001). 3DnT models resulted in severe surface alteration and a greater reduction of the mechanical properties of the EVA. CONCLUSION: The interaction of EVA with 3D resin-printed models without surface treatment or resin-reinforced Type IV dental stone models significantly affected the physical and mechanical properties of this material. The utilization of water-soluble gel coating during the post-curing process of 3D resin printed models improved the mechanical properties of the EVA, similarly when this material was plasticized over conventional Type IV dental stone model.

Effect of surface treatment of ethylene vinyl acetate on the delamination of custom-fitted mouthguards.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Contamination of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) during mouthguard fabrication can cause delamination. The study evaluated the effects of different EVA surface treatments on the contact angle, laminate bond strength, and elongation capacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens of two bonded EVA plates were prepared (n = 30). The Shore A hardness of standardized EVA plate specimens was measured before and after thermo-plasticization. The EVA plates were randomly allocated to one of five different surface treatment groups: no treatment (control); isopropyl alcohol, 100%; chloroform, 99.8%; self-cure acrylic resin monomer (methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, and chemical initiator-amine type); and ethyl alcohol, 70%. The maximum breaking force and elongation at the site of fracture were recorded using a universal testing machine. The contact angle surface was measured using ImageJ software. Scanning electron microscopy of the EVA surface was performed. The laminate bond strength was obtained by dividing the maximum breaking force by the bonding area between the two EVA plates. The laminate bond strength and maximum elongation data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey's and the Dunnet test. The failure mode data was analyzed using the chi-square test (α = .05). RESULTS: EVA surface treatment significantly influenced the laminate bond strength and maximum elongation (p < .001). The control group had a higher contact angle and significantly lower laminate bond strength and maximum elongation than the other groups (p < .001). The acrylic resin monomer and chloroform-treated specimens had similar laminate bond strength and maximum elongation. The acrylic resin monomer group had a significantly lower contact angle (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: All treatments had a significantly higher laminate bond strength and maximum elongation than the control group. The acrylic resin monomer and chloroform groups had a significantly higher laminate bond strength and maximum elongation and the acrylic resin monomer group had a lower contact angle than the other groups. The chloroform should be avoided due its hazardous effects.

Difference in thickness of vacuum-formed mouthguards using ethylene vinyl acetate and polyolefin sheets.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Polyolefin sheets are fabricated in the same manner as ethylene vinyl acetate sheets. The aim of this study was to examine the difference of vacuum-formed mouthguard thickness according to each heating condition using ethylene vinyl acetate and polyolefin sheets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mouthguard sheets of 3.0 mm ethylene vinyl acetate and polyolefin were vacuum-formed on working models at three heating temperatures: 85, 95, and 105°C. The thickness of the mouthguard was measured at the labial surface of the central incisor, the buccal surface of the first molar, and occlusal surface of the first molar. Differences in the thickness of the mouthguards according to the sheet materials and the heating conditions were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Mouthguard thickness varied between the ethylene vinyl acetate and the polyolefin sheets (p < .01), and the thickness of the ethylene vinyl acetate sheet was greater than that of the polyolefin sheet at all heating conditions. The thicknesses of mouthguards fabricated using the ethylene vinyl acetate and the polyolefin sheets were not different for the three heating conditions in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The thickness was greater for mouthguards fabricated using ethylene vinyl acetate sheet than when polyolefin sheet was used. The thickness of the mouthguards was not different for the three heating temperatures for both the ethylene vinyl acetate and the polyolefin sheets.

Biomechanical effects of a hard insert and air space in mouthguards on the shock absorption and protection against fractures of direct resin composite veneers from trauma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mouthguards (MTG) are used to prevent dental trauma. However, their protective effect on esthetic restorations and whether modified MTGs are beneficial is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hard inserts and air spaces in MTGs in protecting direct resin composite veneers during impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty resin composite veneers (1.0 mm) were prepared on upper right central incisors on printed maxilla models using polyether. The effect of the MTGs was evaluated in four groups (n = 5): Con-MTG, conventional custom-fit MTGs made with two layers of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA); Air-MTG, MTGs with the insertion of 2.0 mm air space between the two layers of EVA and tooth surface; PETG-MTG, MTGs with 1.0 mm of polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG) inserted between the EVA layers; and No-MTG, comprising resin composite veneers without MTG. The printed models were fixed in a pendulum device, and the impact was performed at 30°. The strain (µS) and shock absorption (%) of the MTG were recorded using strain gauges. Failure modes and cracks were evaluated using macro photography and transillumination and analyzed using the chi-square test. Strain and shock absorption data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mouthguards reduced strain and enhanced shock absorption, regardless of the MTG type (p < .001). Con-MTG, Air-MTG, and PETG-MTG had shock absorption rates of 76.1%, 72.3%, and 33.4%, respectively (p < .001). The single No-MTG model had a root fracture, while all the others had superficial damage. None of the MTG models had cracks or fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Mouthguards protected the resin composite veneers. The Con-MTG and Air-MTG groups had lower strain and greater shock absorption than the PETG-MTG. Resin veneers had no cracks or damage following MTG use. However, 80% of the veneers had surface damage when no MTG was used.

Influence of ceramic veneer thickness and antagonist on impact stresses during dental trauma with and without a mouthguard assessed with finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Little is known about the effect of dental trauma and mouthguards (MG) on teeth with ceramic laminate veneers (CLV). The aim was to evaluate the influence of CLV thickness and the presence of a MG with and without antagonist tooth contact on impact stresses during dental trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve 2D-finite element models of a head with maxillary structures and upper incisors, six with and six without antagonist tooth, were created in three CLV conditions: sound incisor (no CLV), 0.3 mm CLV, and 1.0 mm CLV. These were evaluated with and without a 4.0-mm ethylene-vinyl acetate MG, with and without an antagonist tooth. An impact analysis was performed in which the head frontally hits a rigid surface at a speed of 1 m/s (3.6 km/h). The results were analyzed using Critical modified von Mises (MPa). The mean of the 10% highest modified von Mises stresses in each structure was collected. RESULTS: MG presence substantially reduced impact stresses in the CLV and tooth structures. The contact of the antagonist tooth promoted better stress distribution and reduced the stress levels in the traumatized tooth. Critical stress areas were found in the palatal enamel, incisal enamel, labial cervical area, and enamel under the CLV for all models without MG. In the models with MG, the stresses reduced significantly. Critical modified von Mises stress showed that sound or prepared enamel experienced more critical impact stresses than 0.3 or 1.0-mm thick CLV. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 4.0 mm EVA mouthguard reduced the impact stress levels in models with 0.3-mm CLV and 1.0-mm CLV, similar to a sound tooth. The contact of an antagonist tooth and the MG better distributed the stresses and reduced the impact stress in the traumatized tooth.

What Sherlock sorely missed: the EVA technology for cultural heritage exploration.

Introduction: Capture of proteins and metabolites from Cultural Heritage (paintings, manuscripts, parchment etc.) has been done in the past via surface scraping and erasing, a method discouraged. The EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) method consists of a plastic polymer in which strong cation and anion resins, admixed with C8 and/or C18, are embedded. Areas covered: We review here the findings on different items stored in public libraries and archives: (a) the original manuscript of the novel Master y Margarita by Bulgakov; (b) the death registries of the lazaretto in the 1630 Milano plague; (c) the shirt worn by A. Chekhov in his death bed; (d) Kepler's script on Hipparchus (in St. Petersburg National Archives); (e) the Memoirs of G. Casanova. Expert opinion: The technique here surveyed appears to be a unique tool enabling exploration of any document stored in public archives, museum and private collections without damaging or contaminating the items under analysis. The amounts harvested from any surface are very minute, yet sufficient for analysis via advanced mass spectrometry instrumentation, thus permitting the identification of all captured material. It is hoped that the present review will stimulate the scientific community to adopt it for projects pertaining to Cultural Heritage.

Indicator Layers Based on Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymer (EVA) and Dicyanovinyl Azobenzene Dyes for Fast and Selective Evaluation of Vaporous Biogenic Amines.

The article presents naked-eye methods for fast, sensitive, and selective detection of isopentylamine and cadaverine vapours based on 4-N,N-dioctylamino-4'-dicyanovinylazobenzene (CR-528) and 4-N,N-dioctylamino-2'-nitro-4'-dicyanovinylazobenzene (CR-555) dyes immobilized in ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA). The reaction of CR-528/EVA and CR-555/EVA indicator layers with isopentylamine vapours caused a vivid colour change from pink/purple to yellow/orange-yellow. Additionally, CR-555/EVA showed colour changes upon exposure to cadaverine. The colour changes were analysed by ultraviolet⁻visible (UV/VIS) molecular absorption spectroscopy for amine quantification, and the method was partially validated for the detection limit, sensitivity, and linear concentration range. The lowest detection limits were reached with CR-555/EVA indicator layers (0.41 ppm for isopentylamine and 1.80 ppm for cadaverine). The indicator layers based on EVA and dicyanovinyl azobenzene dyes complement the existing library of colorimetric probes for the detection of biogenic amines and show great potential for food quality control.

Influence of thickness, color, and polishing process of ethylene-vinyl-acetate sheets on surface roughness and microorganism adhesion.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The surface roughness of dental materials can make cleaning difficult, thus facilitating retention of food debris and accumulation of microorganisms. The aim of this study was to assess whether thickness, color, and the polishing process influence the surface roughness of ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) sheets and the amount of microorganisms that adhere to them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 samples of EVA (5 × 5 mm) were divided into 9 groups according to thickness (G1 = 2 mm; G2 = 3 mm; and G3 = 4 mm), color (G4 = black and G5 = white), and type of polishing (G6 = Scheu™; G7 = Scheu™ associated with hot-air burner; G8 = Erkodent™ and G9 = Erkodent™ associated with hot-air burner). Mean value of 3 roughness parameters was assessed: Ra, Rq, and Rz (one-way ANOVA test and Tukey's test, P < .05). Seven samples of each group (n = 63) were inoculated with saliva for 2 hours to promote microbial adhesion and count the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) (one-way ANOVA test, P < .05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of microbial adhesion and the effects of the polishing process on the surface was assessed. RESULTS: Only the polishing parameter presented less roughness (G2, G7 and G9; P < .05) as also observed on SEM. SEM characterized microbial adhesion but the CFU count was not statistically significant, independent of the assessed parameters. CONCLUSION: The polishing systems, Scheu™ and Erkodent™ in association with a hot-air burner, were effective in decreasing the surface roughness without influencing the amount of adhered microorganisms.

A comparison of different thicknesses of mouthguards according to the groove shape of sheets.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous studies have compared the thickness of the device with and without grooves. The result was a difference in thickness of the device along the groove. The aim of this study was to assess the differences in thickness of mouthguards that result from different groove shapes of ethylene vinyl acetate sheets used to make these appliances. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Mouthguards were made using a 3-dimensional printer, and produced by softening 4 mm transparent circular sheets. Four different shapes of sheets were evaluated: normal sheets, sheets with anterior V-shaped grooves, sheets with anterior A-shaped grooves, and sheets with posterior A-shaped grooves. The groove was 3 mm deep and 5 mm wide. The thickness of the appliance was assessed with respect to the anterior incisal edge, labial surface, palatal surface, posterior cusp, buccal surface, and palatal surface. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze differences in thickness among the different groove shapes. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected between the thickness of mouthguards made using sheets with grooves and that of mouthguards made using sheets without grooves (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The presence of grooves on the sheets did not influence mouthguard thickness.

Optimal heating condition of ethylene-vinyl acetate co-polymer mouthguard sheet in vacuum-pressure formation.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to examine the thickness of mouthguards molded under a variety of heating conditions to clarify suitable conditions during vacuum-pressure forming of ethylene vinyl acetate sheets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mouthguards were fabricated using ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets (thickness: 4.0 mm) using a vacuum-pressure forming machine. The sheet was pressed against the working model, followed by vacuum forming for 10 s and compression molding for 2 min. Three heating conditions were investigated in which the sheet was molded when the center of the softened sheet sagged 10 mm, 15 mm, or 20 mm below the clamp (H-10, H-15, or H-20 respectively). The temperature of the sheet surface was measured using a radiation thermometer under each heating condition. The thickness of the mouthguard sheets after fabrication was determined for the incisal portion (incisal edge and labial surface) and molar portion (cusp and buccal surface), and dimensional measurements were obtained using a measuring device. Differences in thickness due to the heating condition of the sheets were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: The temperature difference between the heated and non-heated surfaces was lowest under H-15. The thickness differences at incisal edge, labial surface, and cusp were determined. The thicknesses for H-10 and H-15 were greater than that for H-20, and the thicknesses for H-10 and H-15 were equivalent at all measurement points. No differences in thickness at the buccal surface were observed for the various heating conditions. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that a sagging distance of 15 mm provided the most suitable forming process. The results of the present study provide a standard heating condition for EVA sheet forming.

Thickness of mouthguard sheets after vacuum-pressure formation: influence of mouthguard sheet material.

The aim of this study was to investigate the thickness of mouthguard sheet after vacuum-pressure formation based on the mouthguard sheet material. Three mouthguard sheet materials (4.0 mm thick) were compared: ethylene-vinyl acetate co-polymer (EVA), olefin co-polymer (OL), and polyolefin-polystyrene co-polymer (OS). The working model was made by hard gypsum that was trimmed to the height of 20 mm at the cutting edge of the maxillary central incisor and 15 mm at the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar. Where the center of the softened sheet sagged 15 mm lower than the clamp, the sheet was pressed against the working model, followed by vacuum forming for 10 s and compression molding for 2 min. The thickness of mouthguard sheets after fabrication was determined for the incisal portion (incisal edge and labial surface) and molar portion (cusp and buccal surface), and dimensional measurements were obtained using a measuring device. Differences in the change in thickness due to sheet materials were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. The OL sheet was thickest at all measurement points. At the incisal edge and cusp, thickness after formation was highest for OL, then EVA and finally OS. At the labial surface and buccal surface, the thickness after formation was highest for OL, then OS and finally EVA. This study suggested that post-fabrication mouthguard thickness differed according to sheet material, with the olefin co-polymer sheet having the smallest thickness reduction.

Difference among shock-absorbing capabilities of mouthguard materials.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the shock absorption capability of commercial thermoforming mouthguard sheet materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve commercial thermoforming mouthguard sheet materials were selected as test materials. The impact test was applied by a free-falling steel ball. When impact forces of approximately 660 N were applied on the commercial thermoforming mouthguard materials, the peak intensities were measured using the load cell sensor. The peak intensity and the time to peak intensity from the onset of the transmitted force were statistically analyzed using one-way anova and Tukey's honest significant difference post hoc test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Statistical analysis for the peak intensity and the time to peak intensity from the onset of the transmitted force revealed significant differences among the thirteen groups including the control. The peak intensity of the polystyrene-polyolefin copolymer-based material was lower than the peak intensity of the EVA-, polyolefin-based material. Polyolefin-based materials had a tendency of a long duration to reach peak intensity from the onset of the transmitted force. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that all of the commercially available mouthguard sheet materials had high shock-absorbing capabilities.

Differences in the thickness of mouthguards fabricated from ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer sheets with differently arranged v-shaped grooves: part 2 - effect of shape on the working model.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in thickness of a working model mouthguard sheet due to different shape. Mouthguards were fabricated with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets (4.0 mm thick) using a vacuum-forming machine. Two shapes of the sheet were compared: normal sheet or v-shaped groove 10-40 mm from the anterior end. Additionally, two shapes of the working model were compared; the basal plane was vertical to the tooth axis of the maxillary central incisor (condition A), and the occlusal plane was parallel to the basal plane (condition B). Sheets were heated until they sagged 15 mm below the clamp. Postmolding thickness was determined for the incisal portion (incisal edge and labial surface) and molar portion (cusp and buccal surface). Differences in the change in thickness due to the shape of the sheets and model were analyzed using two-way anova followed by a Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. The thickness of the mouthguard sheet with v-shaped grooves was more than that of the normal sheet at all measuring points under condition A and condition B (P < 0.01). The thickness of condition B was less than that of condition A, there the incisal portion in the normal sheet and the incisal edge in the sheet with v-shaped grooves (P < 0.01). The present results suggested that thickness after molding was secured by the use of the sheet with v-shaped grooves. In particular, the model with the undercut on the labial surface may be clinically useful.

Investigating the impact of microplastics on triphenyl phosphate adsorption in soil: Insights into environmental factors and soil properties.

Microplastics (MPs) pose significant environmental pollution problems owing to their diverse properties such as various shapes, sizes, compositions, surface features, and levels of degradation. Moreover, their interactions with toxic chemicals and aging processes add complexity to environmental research. This study investigated the adsorption of triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) in soil-only, MP-only, and soil-MP simulated environments under different conditions. The experiment involved three phases: initial exposure to a pH of 5.5 under fluorescent light, subsequent introduction of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and pH adjustment to 4.0 and 7.0, while maintaining UV exposure, each lasting 7 days. The study found that environmental factors affected TPhP sorption capacity, with higher adsorption observed under UV radiation and acidic conditions. In contrast, the MP-only systems showed no clear trend for TPhP adsorption, suggesting kinetic limitations. When MPs were added to the soil, the adsorption dynamics were altered, with varying adsorption capacities observed for different MP polymers under different aging conditions. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, micro-Raman spectroscopy, and water contact angle measurements suggested potential photooxidation processes and changes in the surface hydrophobicity of the MPs subjected to simulated environmental conditions. This study provides valuable insights into the interplay between soil properties, MP characteristics, and environmental factors in determining TPhP sorption dynamics in soil-MP environments.

Effectiveness and Biocompatibility of Tooth Aligners Made from Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PeT-G), Polypropylene (PP), Polycarbonate (PC), Thermoplastic Polyurethanes (TPUs), and Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA): A Systematic Review.

Objective: This systematic review examines the efficacy and biocompatibility of orthodontic clear aligner tooth aligners constructed from polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PeT-G), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs), and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA). Materials and Methods: To find relevant papers published through September 2021, PubMed was searched extensively. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing the effectiveness and biocompatibility of the aligner materials were included. Data were extracted independently, and the quality of included research was appraised using relevant procedures. The research variability necessitated a narrative synthesis. Results: Five studies were included for comparison. All materials were biocompatible; however, PeT-G and EVA aligners caused the least tissue irritation. Patients preferred TPU aligners for initial comfort and PeT-G aligners for transparency and endurance. Conclusion: Biocompatible PeT-G, PP, PC, TPU, and EVA tooth aligners fix malocclusions. Aligner materials should be chosen based on patient preferences, treatment goals, and material qualities. For stronger proof, a longer-term study is needed.

Comparative Study of the Foaming Behavior of Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymer Foams Fabricated Using Chemical and Physical Foaming Processes.

Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), a crucial elastomeric resin, finds extensive application in the footwear industry. Conventional chemical foaming agents, including azodicarbonamide and 4,4'-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide), have been identified as environmentally problematic. Hence, this study explores the potential of physical foaming of EVA using supercritical nitrogen as a sustainable alternative, garnering considerable interest in both academia and industry. The EVA formulations and processing parameters were optimized and EVA foams with densities between 0.15 and 0.25 g/cm3 were produced. Key findings demonstrate that physical foaming not only reduces environmental impact but also enhances product quality by a uniform cell structure with small cell size (50-100 µm), a wide foaming temperature window (120-180 °C), and lower energy consumption. The research further elucidates the mechanisms of cell nucleation and growth within the crosslinked EVA network, highlighting the critical role of blowing agent dispersion and localized crosslinking around nucleated cells in defining the foam's cellular morphology. These findings offer valuable insights for producing EVA foams with a more controllable cellular structure, utilizing physical foaming techniques.