The follicular output rate in normo-ovulating women undergoing ovarian stimulation is increased after unilateral oophorectomy.

STUDY QUESTION: Does unilateral oophorectomy modify the antral follicular responsiveness to exogenous FSH, assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) in normo-ovulating women? SUMMARY ANSWER: Antral follicle responsiveness to exogenous FSH, as assessed by the FORT index, is significantly higher in women with a single ovary in comparison with the ipsilateral ovary of age-matched controls. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Growing evidence indicates that the innovative FORT may be a remarkable tool to evaluate the follicle responsiveness to exogenous FSH, independently of the size of the pretreatment cohort of small antral follicles. It is conceivable that in the unclear compensating mechanisms at play in women having undergone unilateral oophorectomy, an increase in the sensitivity of antral follicles to FSH may be involved. To clarify this issue, we decided to investigate whether the responsiveness of follicles to exogenous FSH, as assessed by the FORT, is altered in unilaterally oophorectomized patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study included 344 non-polycystic ovary syndrome, non-endometriotic women, aged 22-43 years old. There were 86 women who had a single ovary as a result of unilateral oophorectomy or adnexectomy (Single Ovary group; average time since surgery: 52 (8-156) months), and each of them was retrospectively matched with three patients having two intact ovaries, according to age (±1 year), year of ovarian stimulation, and FSH starting dose (±50 IU) (Control group, n = 258). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and total antral follicle count (AFC) (3-12 mm) were assessed on cycle day 3 in both groups. In all patients, follicles were counted before exogenous FSH administration (baseline) and on the day of oocyte trigger (OT) (dOT; preovulatory follicles; 16-22 mm). Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH was estimated in both groups by the FORT, determined by the ratio of the preovulatory follicle count on dOT × 100 to the small AFC at baseline. FORT in the Single Ovary group was compared to the overall FORT considering both ovaries or the index calculated on the ipsilateral ovary of matched controls. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, serum AMH levels and total AFC (1.0 (0.5-2.1) vs 1.8 (1.0-3.3), P < 0.005) and (9.0 (6.0-17.0) vs 13.0 (8.0-21.0), P < 0.001, respectively) were lower in the Single Ovary group compared to the Control group. When considering the FORT calculated on the basis of the overall ovarian response in women with two ovaries, the results were similar when compared to those obtained in patients unilaterally oophorectomized (30.4% (15.6-50.0) vs 32.5% (14.0-50.0), respectively). Interestingly, the comparison of FORT between women with a single ovary and the ipsilateral ovary of age-matched controls, revealed, after adjustment for AMH and AFC, a significantly higher ratio after unilateral oophorectomy (32.5% (14.8-50.0) vs 25.0% (10.0-50.0), P < 0.002, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was based on retrospective data in a limited population. In addition, the FORT index has inherent limitations due to its indirect assessment of follicular responsiveness to FSH. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The present investigation provides evidence that the responsiveness of antral follicles to exogenous FSH is increased in women having undergone unilateral oophorectomy when compared to the ipsilateral ovary of age-matched controls. This is consistent with the implication of a compensating phenomenon that drives the follicular changes in unilaterally oophorectomized patients. Further studies directly assessing the granulosa cell function and the density of FSH receptors in small antral follicles are required to confirm our findings. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors have no funding or competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Evaluative effectiveness of follicular output rate, ovarian sensitivity index, and ovarian response prediction index for the ovarian reserve and response of low-prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: a retrospective study.

The aim was to explore the implications of follicular output rate (FORT), ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), ovarian response prediction index (ORPI), and follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI) in low-prognosis patients defined by POSEIDON criteria. In total, 4030 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles from January 2013 to October 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis and were categorized into four groups based on the POSEIDON criteria. The FORT between Groups 1 and 2 (0.61 ± 0.34 vs. 0.65 ± 0.35, P = 0.081) and Groups 3 and 4 (1.08 ± 0.82 vs. 1.09 ± 0.94, P = 0.899) were similar. The OSI in the order from the highest to the lowest were 3.01 ± 1.46 in Group 1, 2.28 ± 1.09 in Group 2, 1.54 ± 1.04 in Group 3, and 1.34 ± 0.96 in Group 4 (P < 0.001). The trend in the ORPI values was consistent with that in the OSI. FORT, OSI, ORPI, and FOI complemented each other and offered excellent effectiveness in reflecting ovarian reserve and response, but they were not good predictors of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) from IVF.

Endometriosis reduces ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation independent of AMH, AFC, and women's age measured by follicular output rate (FORT) and number of oocytes retrieved.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of endometriosis on the ovarian response during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation measured by number of oocytes retrieved and the follicular output rate (FORT). METHODS: A retrospective, single center study included 96 women, who underwent ICSI treatments for male factor infertility according to World Health Organisation between 2016 until 2018. A total of 96 patients were included in the study with 205 fresh ICSI cycles. The study group included 26 patients with endometriosis after surgical and medical treatment; the control group included 70 patients without endometriosis. The women with endometriosis underwent 47 and the control group 158 ICSI cycles. Women underwent fresh intracytoplasmatic sperm injection cycles after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation following a GnRH-antagonist protocol. The FORT was calculated as the ratio of pre-ovulatory follicle count × 100/small antral follicle count at baseline. RESULTS: A lower number of retrieved oocytes (5.89 vs. 7.25, p = 0.045), lower FORT (75.67 vs. 94.63, p = 0.046), lower number of metaphase II oocytes (4.87 vs. 6.04, p = 0.046), and lower fertilization rate after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (40.61 vs. 57.76, p = 0.003) were found in women with endometriosis compared to women without endometriosis. The number of oocyctes retrieved was 0.71 lower in the group with endometriosis than in the group without (p = 0.026). The FORT was 24.55% lower in the group with endometriosis (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis reduces the FORT and the number of metaphase-II oocytes after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation independly of women's age, antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone.

Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation.

PURPOSE: Oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) represents the most established method for female fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. Whether patients suffering from malignancies, candidates for FP, have a normal ovarian capacity to respond to stimulation is controversial. Reduced responsiveness of antral follicle to exogenous FSH might be at play. The percentage of antral follicles that successfully respond to FSH administration may be estimated by the follicular output rate (FORT), which presumably reflects the health of granulosa cells. The present study aims at investigating whether the FORT differs between Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: Forty-nine BC and 33 HL patient candidates for FP using oocyte vitrification following COH were prospectively studied. FORT was calculated by the ratio between the pre-ovulatory follicle count (16-22 mm) on the day of oocyte triggering × 100/antral follicle count before initiation of the stimulation. RESULTS: Overall, women in the HL group were younger in comparison with BC patients (26.4 ± 3.9 vs 33.6 ± 3.3 years, p < 0.0001, respectively). The FORT was significantly decreased in patients with HL when compared with BC group (27.0 ± 18.8 vs 39.8 ± 18.9%, p = 0.004, respectively), further leading to a comparable number of oocytes vitrified (10.8 ± 5.9 vs 10.2 ± 7.7 oocytes, p = 0.7, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that the percentage of antral follicles that successfully respond to FSH administration is reduced in HL when compared to BC patients, supporting the hypothesis of a detrimental effect of hemopathy on follicular health. In vitro experimentations might provide additional data to confirm this hypothesis.

Prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome based on the follicular output rate.

This study assessed the true accuracy of follicular output rate (FORT) as a prognostic indicator of response to FSH and reproductive competence after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A total of 1643 cycles, including 140 polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients who underwent ovarian stimulation, were studied. FORT was calculated as the ratio of preovulatory follicle count on the day of stimulation×100/small antral follicle count (3-10mm in diameter) at baseline. Low, medium and high FORT groups were defined according to tertile values. Among 1503 non-PCOS cycles, numbers of retrieved oocytes and of all embryos that could be transferred, as well as rates of good-quality embryos, embryo implantations and clinical pregnancies, progressively increased with FORT. In PCOS patients, FORT were significantly lower in patients who achieved clinical pregnancy compared with those who did not (0.56±0.21 versus 0.66±0.29, P=0.031). Fertilization and good-quality embryo rates were significantly higher with medium FORT than low and high FORT (P=0.001 and P=0.047, respectively). Medium FORT in PCOS patients and high FORT in non-PCOS patients may predict better outcomes for IVF/ICSI.

Factors Influencing Follicular Output Rate and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index in POSEIDON-Defined Low-Prognosis Women in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the factors that influence follicular output rate (FORT) and follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI) among infertile Vietnamese women, as described by the Poseidon classification of poor responders. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis includes women who received IVF/ICSI treatment at Hue University Hospital, Vietnam, between January 2017 and December 2019. The study population was divided into four groups: Group 1 (age < 35, AFC ≥ 5 and AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, number of oocytes retrieved in the previous cycle ≤ 9), group 2 (age ≥ 35; AFC ≥ 5 and AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, number of oocytes retrieved in the previous cycle ≤ 9), group 3 (age < 35; AFC < 5 and/or AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) and group 4 (age ≥ 35; AFC < 5 and/or AMH < 1.2 ng/mL). All of the patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation utilizing GnRH antagonist. Results: A total of 243 cases were recruited into groups 1 (n = 44), 2 (n = 33), 3 (n = 54), and 4 (n = 112). There were statistically significant differences between the four groups in terms of age, infertility type, menstrual cycle, body mass index (BMI) and waist-hip ratio (WHR), endocrine tests, and total retrieved oocytes (p 0.05). The average number of oocytes per participant was 7.27, with the highest number occurring in group 1 (10.77) and the lowest occurring in group 4 (5.59). There was a relationship between FORT and BMI (ß: -0.146, p=0.039), FSH starting dose (ß: 0.146, p=0.030), and AMH (ß:0.166, p=0.015). No statistically significant correlation was detected between FOI and other variables. Conclusion: The starting dose of FSH for ovarian stimulation and AMH concentration were positively associated with FORT in individuals with a poor prognosis, whereas BMI was negatively correlated with FORT; No other parameters were found to correlate with FOI.

Corifollitropin alpha was not detrimental to follicular ovarian responsiveness measured by follicular output rate (FORT).

Corifollitropin alpha has been demonstrated to be non-inferior to other gonadotropins in reproductive outcomes. However, its impact on follicular ovarian responsiveness has never been evaluated. Follicular Output Rate (FORT) is an option for objective assessment of the follicular responsiveness. A prospective study was conducted with 306 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Ovarian stimulation protocol was performed with a single dose of 100 µg (<60kg) or 150 µg (≥60kg) corifollitropin alpha in group 1 (n = 147), and 150-300 IU/day human menopausal gonadotropin in group 2 (n = 150). Comparing ovarian stimulation between corifollitropin alpha and human menopausal gonadotropin, no differences regarding FORT were found (40.0% for group 1 versus 40.83% for group 2; p = 0.930). Patients treated with corifollitropin alpha had a higher number of embryos when compared with human menopausal gonadotropin group (3.0 for group 1 versus 2.0 for group 2; p = 0.04). Other secondary outcomes preset were similar between groups. Therefore, corifollitropin alpha can be an excellent option to simplify in vitro fertilisation treatment due to the "patient-friendly" protocol.

Letrozole cotreatment improves the follicular output rate in high-body-mass-index women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF treatment.

Background: Women who have polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with high body mass index (BMI) typically have an attenuated ovarian response and decreased follicular size, which are linked to unfavourable clinical outcomes following in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy. The follicular output rate (FORT), a qualitative indicator of follicular response, seems to be positively linked to the clinical outcomes of IVF. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has become an alternative to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues to inhibit the premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. As letrozole (LE) shows promise in enhancing ovarian response, we compared PPOS with and without LE for PCOS in high BMI women with a focus on the FORT and associated clinical and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: For the recruited 1508 women, ten variables including AFC; age; basal sex hormone level; BMI; infertility type; period of infertility and number of previous IVF attempts were chosen in the propensity score matching (PSM) model to match 1374 women who taken the MPA+ hMG protocol with 134 women who received the MPA+ hMG+ LE treatment at a 1:1 ratio. FORT was selected as the primary outcome measure. The number of oocytes retrieved, viable embryos, hMG dosage, duration, oocyte maturity rate, fertilization rate, and implantation rate were established as secondary outcomes. Results: FORT was substantially elevated in the MPA+hMG+LE group compared with the MPA+hMG group (61% [35%, 86%] vs. 40% [25%, 60%], P <.001). Interestingly, the LE cotreatment group had a considerably lower mature oocyte rate despite having a similar number of mature oocytes and embryos recovered. The average hMG dosages and durations in the study group were similar to those in the control group. The implantation rate in the study group was numerically higher but without statistic significant than that in the control groups (43.15% (107/248) vs. 38.59% (115/298), OR 1.008, 95% CI 0.901-1.127; P >.05). Conclusion: The effect of LE combined with PPOS on FORT is better than the effect of the standard PPOS treatment in women with PCOS and a high BMI, but there is no substantially beneficial impact on pregnancy outcomes or the cycle features of COS, including consumption of hMG.

Ovarian sensitivity index can be used as a more sensitive indicator than follicular output rate to predict IVF/ICSI outcomes in patients of normal expected ovarian response stimulated with GnRH antagonist protocol.

This retrospective study was performed to investigate the predictive power of the Ovarian Sensitivity Index (OSI) for IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile patients who were of normal expected ovarian response. A total of 912 infertile patients who underwent GnRH antagonist protocol between January 2017 to August 2019 at the Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital were included. All patients completed the full oocyte retrieval cycle and either had a live birth or had no embryos left. OSI was significantly lower in patients with a live birth (196.0 ± 120.4 in the live birth group vs 276.4 ± 235.7 in the non-live birth group, p < 0.001) while follicular output rate (FORT, defined as the ratio of pre-ovulatory follicle count on hCG day x 100/small antral follicle count at baseline) showed no significant difference. Patients were divided into low, average and high OSI groups and analysed in tertiles. From the low to the high OSI group, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) decreased dramatically (72.7 vs 67.2 vs 54.8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that OSI was an independent factor affecting CLBR (OR: 0.996, 95%CI: 0.995-0.998, p < 0.001) in our study population. In conclusion, OSI can be used as an independent indicator to distinguish fecundity in infertile patients with normal expected ovarian response and is probably more sensitive than FORT.

Women in Advanced Reproductive Age: Are the Follicular Output Rate, the Follicle-Oocyte Index and the Ovarian Sensitivity Index Predictors of Live Birth in an IVF Cycle?

(1) Background: Several researchers have investigated alternative markers related to ovarian responsiveness in order to better predict IVF outcomes, particularly in advanced reproductive-aged women. The follicular output rate (FORT), the follicle-oocyte index (FOI) and the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) are among the most promising. However, these three metrics have not been investigated as independent predictors of live birth in women of advanced reproductive age; neither have they been compared to the two 'component' characteristics that are used to calculate them. (2) Methods: A logistic regression model containing all relevant predictors of ovarian reserve or response was used to evaluate the potential of FORT, FOI and OSI as predictors of live birth. After, the non-linear associations between FORT, FOI and OSI and the probability of live birth were evaluated. Finally, we fitted multiple logistic regression models to compare whether FORT, FOI and OSI were more informative predictors than their components. (3) Results: 590 couples received a total of 740 IVF cycles, after which, 127 (17.5%) obtained a live birth. None of FORT, FOI and OSI showed a strength of association or a p-value even close to female age (odds ratio for live birth (95% confidence interval) 1.00 (0.99-1.01), 1.00 (0.99-1.01), 0.98 (0.88-1.11) and 0.58 (0.48-0.72), respectively). The three models comparing FORT, FOI and OSI with the number of oocytes retrieved, the AFC, the number of preovulatory follicles and the FSH total dose were not more informative. (4) Conclusions: In a population of women of advanced age with unexplained infertility, none of FORT, FOI and OSI were predictive of live birth or more predictive than the two 'component' characteristics that were used to calculate them. We suggest clinicians and researchers still use female age as the most reliable predictor of an IVF treatment.

Effects of follicular output rate on cumulative clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate in PCOS patients with different characteristics.

Objective: We aim to explore the effects of follicular output rate (FORT) on cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients with different characteristics undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 454 patients with PCOS undergoing their first IVF cycle at our center from January 2016 to December 2020. FORT was calculated as pre-ovulatory follicle count (PFC) × 100/antral follicle count (AFC). Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to explore the relationships between FORT and CCPR and CLBR. Curve fitting and threshold effect analyses were established to find nonlinear relationships. Effect modification in different subgroups were examined by stratification analyses. Results: Based on the FORT values, individuals were classified into the following three groups: low-FORT group, middle-FORT group and high-FORT group. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that FORT was an independent factor affecting the CCPR and CLBR significantly (OR = 1.015, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.030 and OR = 1.010, 95% CI:1.001, 1.020). Curve fitting and threshold effect analyses showed that the CCPR and CLBR had a positive correlation with FORT when the FORT was less than 70% (OR = 1.039, 95% CI: 1.013, 1.065 and OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 1.004, 1.044). Stratification analyses showed that the CLBR increased by 1.3% with each additional unit of FORT for patients with hyperandrogenic manifestations (OR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.025). Compared with the low-FORT group, in the high-FORT group, CCPR increased 1.251 times for patients with polycystic ovarian morphology, while CCPR and CLBR increased 1.891 times and 0.99 times for those with ovulation disorder, respectively (OR = 2.251, 95% CI: 1.008, 5.028 and OR = 2.891, 95% CI: 1.332, 6.323 and OR = 1.990, 95% CI: 1.133, 3.494). Conclusion: In patients with PCOS, cumulative IVF outcomes have a positive correlation with FORT when the FORT is less than 70%. For PCOS patients with polycystic ovarian morphology, ovulation disorder or hyperandrogenic manifestations, a high FORT could be conductive to achieving better pregnancy outcomes.

Impact of Ovarian Yield-Number of Total and Mature Oocytes Per Antral Follicular Count-On Live Birth Occurrence After IVF Treatment.

To assess the relation between oocytes yield including total retrieved oocytes (O)c and total mature oocytes (MII) relative to the antral follicular count (AFC) (3-9 mm in diameter) and relative to anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) ng/mL level: Oc/AFC, MII/AFC, Oc/AMH, and MII/AMH, respectively, and ART outcomes. We included retrospectively 264 IVF cycles after the first embryo transfer (ET) and after the cumulative ET (CET). The implantation rate (IR) and the live birth rate (LBR) after first ET were 31 ± 39% and 32.6%, respectively, and after CET 35 ± 38% and 45.1%, respectively. There was a significantly higher average of Oc/AFC and MII/AFC when live birth (LB) occurred after the first ET (0.82 ± 0.4 vs. 0.71 ± 0.35 and 0.57 ± 0.4 vs. 0.68 ± 0.3, respectively, P < 0.05). We reported a significantly higher average of MII/AFC when LB occurred after CET (0.66 ± 0.3 vs. 0.56 ± 0.30, P = 0.02) in comparison to the group where no LB was obtained. Increased Oc/AFC and MII/AFC ratios were associated with the occurrence of LB and increased IR after first ET (P < 0.05). Increased MII/AFC ratio was associated with the occurrence of LB and IR after CET (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). After age-adjusted multivariate analyses, all these trends were confirmed (P < 0.05) except for the effect of MII/AFC ratio on IR after CET. In conclusion, Oc/AMH and MII/AMH ratios have no effect on the occurrence of LBR or on IR after first ET or CET at either age grouping. Ratios Oc/AFC and MII/AFC seem promising indicators to assess ovarian response.

The Follicular Output Rate (FORT) as a method to evaluate transdermal testosterone efficacy in poor responders.

OBJECTIVE: Follicular Output Rate (FORT) is an efficient quantitative and qualitative marker of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins. Transdermal testosterone (TT) has been used as adjuvant therapy to gonadotrophins in order to improve ovarian response in poor responders (PR). The aim of this study was to analyze whether TT can improve follicular sensitivity to gonadotropins using FORT. METHODS: This retrospective study, held in a tertiary-care university hospital included 90 PR patients, according to the Bologna criteria. Patients in Group 1 (n = 46) received transdermal application of testosterone preceding gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation under pituitary suppression. In Group 2 (n = 44) ovarian stimulation was carried out with high-dose gonadotrophin in association with minidose GnRH agonist protocol. We analyzed ovarian stimulation parameters and IVF outcomes. We determined antral follicle count (AFC) (3-8 mm) before ovarian stimulation, pre-ovulatory follicle count (PFC) (16-22 mm) and the day of hCG administration. We calculated the FORT using the PFCx100/AFC ratio. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and ovarian reserve parameters were similar in both groups. FORT and oocytes retrieved were significantly higher in group 1 vs group 2. There were no significant differences in pregnancy rates. In group 1 there was a significant correlation between FORT and AFC. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the potential beneficial mechanism of TT in poor responder patients may be based on increasing the antral follicle sensitivity to gonadotrophin. FORT is an excellent tool to demonstrate this.

Follicular Output Rate and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index of Low Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 32,128 Treatment Cycles.

Objective: To investigate ovarian sensitivity in subgroups of patients with a low prognosis, as defined by the POSEIDON criteria, undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and measures to improve ovarian sensitivity in these patients. Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: The study was conducted at an IVF clinic in a public hospital. Patients: A total of 32,128 fresh IVF cycles from January 2014 to October 2018 at a single IVF clinic were included in the analysis. Patients with a low prognosis were categorized into four groups based on the POSEIDON criteria. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcome measures were the follicular output rate (FORT) and the follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI). Results: The FORTs in the order from the highest to the lowest were 1.18 in group 3, 0.98 in group 4, 0.76 in group 1, and 0.68 in group 2. The trend in the FOI values was consistent with that in the FORTs. Among patients with poor ovarian sensitivity, 58.41% of patients with FORTs ≥ 0.30 in the second cycle underwent an adjustment to the ovarian stimulation (OS) protocol and 41.59% underwent an adjustment to the gonadotropin (Gn) starting dose. Among patients with normal ovarian sensitivity, 43.56% of those with FORTs ≥ 0.80 in the second cycle underwent an adjustment to the OS protocol and 56.44% underwent an adjustment to the Gn starting dose. Conclusion: Ovarian sensitivity was the highest in group 3 (young women with poor ovarian reserve), followed by groups 4 (women at advanced age with poor ovarian reserve) and 1 (young women with good ovarian reserve), and it was the lowest in group 2 (women at advanced age with good ovarian reserve). For patients with poor ovarian sensitivity, it is preferred to recommend an adjustment to the OS protocol, while for those with normal ovarian sensitivity, adjusting the Gn starting dose is preferred.

Antral follicle responsiveness assessed by follicular output RaTe(FORT) correlates with follicles diameter.

BACKGROUND: The antral follicle count is a marker of ovarian reserve. Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) evaluates the proportion of follicles responsive to exogenous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) during controlled ovarian stimulation. Our objective was to evaluate whether the diameter (AFC6: ≤ 6 mm or AFC > 6: > 6 mm) of the follicular cohort could be a predictor for ovarian responsiveness, assessed by FORT, in a prospective cohort with 92 women with IVF indication, regular cycles and no abnormality in both ovaries. RESULTS: The mean age (±SD) of the women was 36.03 years (± 3.87 years), the median FORT was 43.30%. We found correlation between the FORT and AFC6 (r = - 0.237, P 0.023) but not between the FORT and AFC > 6 (r = - 0.055, P 0.602). CONCLUSIONS: The inverse correlation between FORT and AFC6 suggests that those follicles were less responsive to the exogenous FSH.

Understanding Follicular Output Rate (FORT) and its Implications for POSEIDON Criteria.

The management of low prognosis patients in ART represents a challenge for reproductive specialists. Different profiles and biologic characteristics have been identified among these patients. Indeed, while poor ovarian response can be seen in patients with impaired ovarian reserve, others, identified as hypo-responders, show unexpected poor or suboptimal response to controlled ovarian stimulation despite satisfying ovarian parameters. These hypo-responders are associated during FSH stimulation to slow initial responses in terms of estradiol levels and follicle growth, longer stimulations, and/or greater cumulative FSH doses. Hence, it appears that ovarian sensitivity to gonadotropins differs from a patient to another, and plays a determinant role on ovarian response to stimulation. Although precise mechanisms remain to be elucidated, increasing evidence suggests that ovarian sensitivity to FSH could be influenced by the presence of genetic mutations or single nucleotide polymorphisms of gonadotropins and their receptors. Evaluating ovarian sensitivity to FSH therefore appears as a key element to improve IVF success rates in these low prognosis patients and open new treatment perspectives. Since the traditional ovarian markers currently used are not sufficient to accurately reflect ovarian response to FSH, a tool to assess ovarian sensitivity to gonadotropin stimulation was required. The present review aims to present Follicular Output Rate (FORT) as an efficient quantitative and qualitative marker of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins, discuss the underlying mechanisms of impaired sensitivity to FSH and the possible FORT implications for Poseidon criteria.

Comparison of the follicular output rate after controlled ovarian stimulation with daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus corifollitropin alfa.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Follicular Output Rate (FORT) between corifollitropin alfa (CFA) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective analysis compared FORT between women treated with CFA or rFSH from three clinical trials: ENGAGE (N = 1476; ages 18-36, >60 kg), ENSURE (N = 395; ages 18-36, ≤60 kg), and PURSUE (N = 1388; ages 35-42, ≥50 kg). Women underwent COS in a GnRH antagonist protocol followed by hCG trigger prior to IVF. Antral follicle count (AFC; <11 mm) and pre-ovulatory follicle count (>15 mm) were used for FORT, defined as [pre-ovulatory follicles/AFCx100]. RESULTS: For CFA and rFSH, respectively, mean FORT (adjusted for trial and age) was 85.0 versus 76.8 (p < 0.001) in the combined cohort, 86.0 versus 75.0 in ENGAGE (p < 0.001), 96.2 versus 79.2 in ENSURE (p = 0.070), and 74.1 versus 71.2 in PURSUE (p = 0.180); mean oocyte output (oocytes retrieved/AFCx100, adjusted for age) was 121.9 versus 107.3 in ENGAGE (p = 0.001), 133.5 versus 102.3 in ENSURE (p < 0.001), and 100.6 versus 98.1 in PURSUE (p = 0.463). FORT and oocyte output were consistent with the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved for CFA and rFSH: 10.4 versus 8.8 in ENGAGE (p < 0.001), 10.3 versus 7.6 in ENSURE (p < 0.001), and 7.5 versus 7.2 in PURSUE (p = 0.37). No differences in pregnancy rates based on FORT were observed. CONCLUSIONS: FORT was significantly higher in CFA-stimulated cycles and accurately predicted oocyte output. No association of FORT with pregnancy likelihood was found.

Use of Follicular Output Rate to Predict Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcome.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of follicular output rate (FORT) has been proposed as a good indicator for evaluating follicular response to the exogenous recombinant folliclestimulating hormone (rFSH). This places FORT as a promising qualitative marker for ovarian function. The objective of the study was to determine FORT as a predictor of oocyte competence, embryo quality and clinical pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out on a group of infer- tile females (n=282) at Islamabad Clinic Serving Infertile Couples, Islamabad, Pakistan, from June 2010 till August 2013. Downregulated females were stimulated in injection gonadotropins and on ovulation induction day, pre-ovulatory follicle count (PFC) was determined using transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVUS), and FORT was determined as a ratio of PFC to antral follicle count (AFC)×100. Group I consisted of females with a negative pregnancy test, while group II had a positive pregnancy test that was confirmed with the appearance of fetal cardiac activity. Linear regression analyses of categorical variables of clinical pregnancy along with other independent variables, including FORT, were performed using SPSS version 15.0. RESULTS: Pregnancy occurred in 101/282 women who were tested, recording a clinical pregnancy rate of about 35.8%. FORT values were higher in group II as compared to group I females (P=0.0001). In multiple regression analysis, 97.7, 87.1, 78.2, and 83.4% variations were explained based on the number of retrieved oocytes per patients, number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved, number of fertilized oocytes, and number of cleaved embryos, respectively, indicating FORT as an independent predictor. CONCLUSION: FORT is a predictor of oocyte competence in terms of a number of retrieved, mature and fertilized oocytes. It also gives information about the number of cleaved embryos and clinical pregnancy rate.