Frontline Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has tremendously evolved in the last decades, thanks to the introduction of more effective therapies. SUMMARY: Frontline therapy for patients with CLL includes chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and pathway inhibitors (PIs) (i.e., bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and BCL2 inhibitors); the latter has proved to be more effective than CIT mainly in patients with high-risk features (e.g., TP53 aberrations and unmutated IGHV) with acceptable toxicity. Combinations of PIs are playing the protagonist role as frontline therapy for CLL. KEY MESSAGES: In this article, the management of treatment-naïve patients with CLL is discussed.

Pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A plain language summary of the ARROW study.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a research study called ARROW, which tested a medicine called pralsetinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thyroid cancer, and other advanced solid tumours caused by a change in a gene called RET. For the purposes of this summary, only patients with NSCLC with a change in RET called fusion (RET fusion+) are highlighted. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In total, 281 patients with RET fusion+ NSCLC had taken part in this study across the USA, Europe, and Asia. Patients were asked to take four pills (adding up to 400 mg) of pralsetinib each day and were checked for any changes in their tumours, as well as for any side effects. After an average of 8 months of treatment with pralsetinib, 72% of previously untreated patients and 59% of patients who had previously received chemotherapy had considerable shrinkage of their tumours. Among 10 patients with tumours which had spread to the brain (all of whom had received previous treatments), 70% had their tumours shrink greatly in the brain after treatment with pralsetinib. On average, patients lived with little to no tumour growth for 16 months. In previously untreated patients, the most common severe side effects that were considered related to pralsetinib treatment were decreased white blood cells (neutrophils and lymphocytes), increased blood pressure, and an increase in a blood protein called creatine phosphokinase. In previously treated patients, the severe side effects were decreased white blood cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes, and leukocytes), increased blood pressure, and low levels of red blood cells. In both untreated and previously treated patients, the most common severe side effects that required hospital attention were lung inflammation/swelling causing shortness of breath (pneumonitis) and lung infection (pneumonia). WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Overall, the ARROW study showed that pralsetinib was effective in shrinking tumours in patients with RET fusion+ NSCLC regardless of previous treatment history. The recorded side effects were expected in patients receiving this type of medicine. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03037385 (ARROW) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Determinants of frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor choice for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: A study from the Registro Italiano LMC and Campus CML.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved in Italy for frontline treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). The choice of TKI is based on a combined evaluation of the patient's and the disease characteristics. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of frontline TKI therapy in an unselected cohort of Italian patients with CP-CML to correlate the choice with the patient's features. METHODS: A total of 1967 patients with CP-CML diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 at 36 centers throughout Italy were retrospectively evaluated; 1089 patients (55.4%) received imatinib and 878 patients (44.6%) received a second-generation (2G) TKI. RESULTS: Second-generation TKIs were chosen for most patients aged <45 years (69.2%), whereas imatinib was used in 76.7% of patients aged >65 years (p < .001). There was a predominant use of imatinib in intermediate/high European long-term survival risk patients (60.0%/66.0% vs. 49.7% in low-risk patients) and a limited use of 2G-TKIs in patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous neoplasms, ischemic heart disease, or stroke and in those with >3 concomitant drugs. We observed a greater use of imatinib (61.1%) in patients diagnosed in 2018-2019 compared to 2012-2017 (53.2%; p = .002). In multivariable analysis, factors correlated with imatinib use were age > 65 years, spleen size, the presence of comorbidities, and ≥3 concomitant medications. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study of almost 2000 cases of CML shows that imatinib is the frontline drug of choice in 55% of Italian patients with CP-CML, with 2G-TKIs prevalently used in younger patients and in those with no concomitant clinical conditions. Introduction of the generic formulation in 2018 seems to have fostered imatinib use.

Safety and efficacy of pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer including as first-line therapy: update from the ARROW trial.

BACKGROUND: RET fusions are present in 1%-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, central nervous system-penetrant, selective RET inhibitor, previously demonstrated clinical activity in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC in the phase I/II ARROW study, including among treatment-naive patients. We report an updated analysis from the ARROW study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ARROW is a multi-cohort, open-label, phase I/II study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later 0-1). Patients initiated pralsetinib at the recommended phase II dose of 400 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal, or investigator's decision. The co-primary endpoints (phase II) were overall response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review and safety. RESULTS: Between 17 March 2017 and 6 November 2020 (data cut-off), 281 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC were enrolled. The ORR was 72% [54/75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 60% to 82%] for treatment-naive patients and 59% (80/136; 95% CI 50% to 67%) for patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy (enrolment cut-off for efficacy analysis: 22 May 2020); median duration of response was not reached for treatment-naive patients and 22.3 months for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Tumour shrinkage was observed in all treatment-naive patients and in 97% of patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy; median progression-free survival was 13.0 and 16.5 months, respectively. In patients with measurable intracranial metastases, the intracranial response rate was 70% (7/10; 95% CI 35% to 93%); all had received prior systemic treatment. In treatment-naive patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who initiated pralsetinib by the data cut-off (n = 116), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (18%), hypertension (10%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (9%), and lymphopenia (9%). Overall, 7% (20/281) discontinued due to TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Pralsetinib treatment produced robust efficacy and was generally well tolerated in treatment-naive patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Results from the confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting are pending.

MAJIC: a phase III trial of acalabrutinib + venetoclax versus venetoclax + obinutuzumab in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Here we describe the rationale and design of MAJIC, a phase III, prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the combination of the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib plus the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax versus the combination of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab as frontline treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. In both treatment arms, disease response (assessed by International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria) and minimal residual disease will be used to guide therapy duration, with all patients ultimately discontinuing treatment after a maximum of 2 years. The primary end point is progression-free survival. Key secondary end points include rates of undetectable minimal residual disease, overall response and overall survival. This study will address key unanswered questions in frontline chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma therapy by investigating the optimal duration of finite treatment and identifying the optimal venetoclax doublet regimen.

This article describes the design of the MAJIC clinical trial, which investigates two different treatment combinations for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received treatment for their disease previously. Patients will be randomized (put into a group by chance) to receive either acalabrutinib + venetoclax (AV) or venetoclax + obinutuzumab (VO). VO is already an approved initial treatment option for CLL/SLL. Acalabrutinib is also an approved initial treatment option when given by itself, but the AV combination is not yet approved. We are doing this study to better understand and directly compare how well AV and VO work when used for the treatment of CLL/SLL. A test done on the blood and bone marrow called 'minimal residual disease' will be used to help guide the length of time that patients receive treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05057494 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

The clinical and economic burden of peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a systematic literature review.

Aim: To understand the burden of treatment-naive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in November 2020 following best practice methodology. Results: Fifty-five clinical studies were included, mostly investigating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) or 'CHOP-like' regimens, with combination regimens showing similar effectiveness to CHOP alone. Aside from the combination of brentuximab vedotin + cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (A+CHP), other available treatments showed no statistically significant benefit over CHOP in terms of overall or progression-free survival in overall PTCL patients. The mean monthly cost per patient in the USA ranged from 6328 to US$9356 based on six studies. One economic evaluation demonstrated A+CHP to be a more cost-effective treatment option than CHOP. Conclusion: Further research is needed to understand the humanistic and cost impact of frontline treatment for PTCL and its specific subtypes.

Plain language summary Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is an aggressive cancer that develops from white blood cells called T cells, which are an important part of the immune system. There is limited knowledge on the impact PTCL has on patients and their families. This systematic review of 55 clinical studies was conducted to further understand how safe and effective current treatments are for patients with newly diagnosed PTCL, how these treatments and disease impact their quality of life, and the economic impact of treatment and disease. Chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone [CHOP]) was the most commonly studied regimen, but had limited effectiveness and a notable side effect profile. A newer treatment option, brentuximab vedotin + cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (A+CHP) was the only treatment to show a significant added benefit over CHOP for patients, with side effects that were comparable to those of CHOP. Six studies assessed the economic impact of PTCL, the majority of which were focused on the USA, and found the mean monthly cost per patient to be 6328­US$9356. No studies were identified that assessed the impact of PTCL or its treatment on quality of life. Further research is needed to understand the impact of frontline PTCL treatment on patients and their families.

Effect of induction therapy with lenalidomide, doxorubicin and dexamethasone on bone remodeling and angiogenesis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

There is limited data regarding the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide, adriamycin and dexamethasone (RAD) combination on newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. There is also scarce information about the effect of lenalidomide on bone metabolism and angiogenesis in NDMM. Thus, we conducted a Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAD regimen as induction in transplant-eligible NDMM patients and we studied the effects on bone metabolism and angiogenesis. A total of 45 patients were enrolled. Following four cycles of RAD, the overall response rate was 66.7% and after a median follow up of 29.1 months (range 21.0-34.9), the median survival outcomes have not been reached yet. RAD had a favorable toxicity profile and did not impair stem cell collection. RAD significantly reduced bone resorption markers CTX (p = 0.03) and TRACP-5b (p < 0.01). Interestingly, RAD also increased bone formation markers bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.036), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (p = 0.028) and osteocalcin (p = 0.026), which has not been described before with lenalidomide-containing regimens in the absence of bortezomib coadministration. Furthermore, the angiogenic cytokines VEGF (p = 0.01), angiogenin (p = 0.02) and bFGF (p < 0.01) were significantly reduced post-RAD induction. Our results suggest that RAD is an effective induction regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation with beneficial effects on bone metabolism and angiogenesis.

Frontline treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Beyond R-CHOP.

Although the majority of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with the standard immunochemotherapy R-CHOP, one-third of them relapses with a dismal outcome in most cases. In the recent years, remarkable advances have been achieved based on the discovery of molecular genetics in DLBCL. In addition to the major cell-of-origin designations of germinal center B-cell and activated B-cell subtypes, next-generation sequencing has unveiled the remarkable complexity of DLBCL and identified potential molecular targets for tailored therapies. Despite these findings, the current standard of care for DLBCL patients is still R-CHOP, and optimization of frontline therapy remains an important goal. In this review, we summarize recent updates on the evolution of frontline therapies for DLBCL.

The use and effectiveness of rituximab maintenance in patients with follicular lymphoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The authors examined the "real-world" effectiveness of rituximab (R) maintenance therapy (R-maintenance) compared with observation after R-based induction therapy in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) in the United States. METHODS: The National LymphoCare Study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study that enrolled > 2700 untreated patients with FL diagnosed from 2004 to 2007 at 265 sites in the United States. Among these, patients who achieved at least stable disease after R-based induction therapy were eligible for the current analysis. Patients who initiated R-maintenance within 215 days of completing induction therapy were categorized as the R-maintenance group, and those who did not initiate therapy during this period were categorized as the observation group. The objective of the current study was to determine the effect of R-maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 1439 patients completed R-based induction therapy, 1186 of whom met all inclusion criteria (541 patients received R-maintenance and 645 patients were observed). Characteristics that were found to be predictive of receiving R-maintenance were histology grade (1/2), Ann Arbor stage of disease (III/IV), geographic region (region other than the West), and practice setting (community practice). With a median follow-up of 5.7 years, R-maintenance was associated with superior PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.56-0.84 [P = .0003]) and TTNT (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84 [P = .0007]). No significant difference in OS was observed (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.14 [P = .23]). CONCLUSIONS: R-maintenance in patients with FL and at least stable disease after R-based induction therapy provided significantly longer PFS and TTNT in comparison with observation, but no significant difference in OS was observed with 5-years of follow-up. This comparative effectiveness study aligns with the results of randomized trials suggesting that similar outcomes occur with R-maintenance in FL with the treatment variations observed in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine-Rituximab as Frontline Therapy for Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Real-World, Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Background The use of bendamustine with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody as frontline therapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has become a standard of care. We aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of bendamustine-rituximab (BR) frontline therapy for indolent NHL. Patients and methods Patients with indolent NHL treated with frontline BR therapy in Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, from January 2015 to August 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Results Our cohort included 42 adults with a median age of 63 years. Follicular lymphoma was the most common histology (n = 31, 74%). Most patients had advanced disease (Lugano stage III or IV, 88%). The overall response rate was 84% (complete response = 62% and partial response = 22%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached. At 30 months, PFS was 74.8% and overall survival was 90%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 21% of patients. Infection-related adverse events were observed in 17 patients (40%). Most were grade 1 and 2 events (84%). One case of grade 5 progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy related to John Cunningham (JC) virus reactivation was observed. The most common non-infectious-related adverse events were mild nausea and fatigue. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of BR treatment for indolent NHL were comparable in our real-life cohort compared to prior studies. This supports BR as a standard of care for indolent NHL. Future studies should assess whether the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors as primary prophylaxis effectively mitigates the hematological and infection-related adverse events related to BR therapy.

Update on the outcome of M-protein screening program of multiple myeloma in China: A 7-year cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To improve the early detection rate of multiple myeloma (MM), the M-protein screening system has been performed in the hospital population at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University since 2014, with electrophoretic-based monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein) screening integrated into the blood biochemistry panel. This study updated 7-year follow-up findings of MM patients diagnosed by screening-driven and symptom-driven approaches. METHODS: The retrospective study compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed through two patterns by reviewing the plasma cell disease database from January 2014 to October 2021. The screening-driven group included patients diagnosed through the screening system during workups of unrelated medical conditions or routine checkups. In contrast, patients who visited or were referred to the hematological department due to myeloma-related end-organ damage were categorized into the symptom-driven group. RESULTS: There were 3,110,218 serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) tests performed during 7 years, with 1.95% (60,609) patients yielding positive SPEP results. Of 911 confirmed MM cases (excluding concurrent amyloidosis), 366 were assigned to the screening-driven group, while 545 were to the symptom-driven group. Compared to the symptom-driven group, the screening group had more IgG subtypes, earlier International Stage System stages, fewer disease-related symptoms, lower ECOG scores, less extramedullary disease, a lower percentage of bone marrow plasma cells, and a lower level of lactate dehydrogenase. Frontline response results of two groups were similar. Patients detected through screening had a significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS) than the symptom-driven group (62.2 vs. 24.9 months, p < 0.001, HR: 2.12, 95% CIs: 1.69-2.65), with median follow-ups of 32.6 and 27.4 months. Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients of the screening group (not reached vs. 62.3 months, p < 0.001, HR: 2.49, 95% CIs: 1.81-3.41). After being adjusted for well-acknowledged myeloma prognostic factors, the screening-driven diagnostic pattern remained an independent prognostic factor indicating improved PFS and OS in MM patients. CONCLUSION: Routine M-protein screening for MM in the hospital population results in an earlier diagnosis and better patient outcomes.

CARs Moving Forward: The Development of CAR T-Cell Therapy in the Earlier Treatment Course of Hematologic Malignancies.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. There are several approvals in lymphomas, leukemias and myeloma. Randomized clinical trials have shown that CAR-T cell therapy improves survival over standard of care in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM), changing dramatically the current treatment paradigm. Current efforts are directed in improving outcomes in the frontline setting and confirmatory randomized trials are ongoing.

Luspatercept in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a paradigm shift in treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), anemia is prevalent affecting 80%-85% of low-risk (LR-MDS) patients, with 40% eventually requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Except forlenalidomide, exclusively approved for those with deletion of chromosome 5q,erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the primary treatment choice for low-risk patients. Those unresponsive to ESAs face limited alternatives, eventually necessitating long-term RBC transfusions, leading to secondary iron overload and adversely affecting quality of life (QoL). AREA COVERED: Luspatercept is a pioneering erythroid maturation agent. It received approval by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating adults experiencing transfusion-dependent anemia associated with LR-MDS or ß-thalassemia. Recently, the FDA approved luspatercept as first- line therapy in patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who require RBC transfusions and have not previously received ESAs. This review summarizes the historical impact of luspatercept intreating LR-MDS unresponsive to ESAs and illustrates its potential benefit asfrontline therapy in MDS and its employment in patients with myelofibrosis-induced anemia. EXPERT OPINION: Luspatercept has revolutionized the therapeutic paradigm of LR-MDS, for which there was a limited therapeutic arsenal, especially in the setting of patients who did not respond or fail after ESA treatment.

Revisiting Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Where Do Cisplatin and Platinum Ineligibility Criteria Stand?

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) for more than two decades. However, many patients with comorbidities cannot receive cisplatin or its alternative, carboplatin. 'Cisplatin-ineligible' and 'platinum-ineligible' patients lacked effective therapy options. However, the recent combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, with pembrolizumab (P), an antibody targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint, is changing the status quo of frontline mUC treatment, with potential synergy seen in the EV-103 and EV-302 clinical trials. First, we review the working definitions of 'cisplatin ineligibility' and 'platinum ineligibility' in mUC clinical trials and the standard of care in both categories. Then, we review select clinical trials for frontline treatment of cisplatin- and platinum-ineligible mUC patients on ClinicalTrials.gov. We classify the investigated drugs in these trials by their therapeutic strategies. Alongside chemotherapy combinations, the field is witnessing more immunotherapy combinations with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, bicycle toxin conjugates, bispecific antibodies, innovative targeted therapies, and many others. Most importantly, we rethink the value of classifying patients by cisplatin or platinum ineligibility in the frontline setting in the post-EVP era. Lastly, we discuss new priority goals to tailor predictive, monitoring, and prognostic biomarkers to these emergent therapies.

Unresolved questions in selection of therapies for treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) continues to undergo considerable evolution. Optimal selection of initial therapy from multiple effective options provides a major challenge for clinicians, who need to consider both disease and patient factors in conjunction with a view to sequencing available therapies in event of disease relapse. REVIEW: We explore the most topical clinically relevant unresolved questions through discussion of important available pertinent literature and propose expert opinion based on these data. (1) Shrinking role of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT); while novel therapies are generally superior, we highlight the utility of FCR for IGHV-mutated CLL. (2) Choosing between inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTKi); while efficacy between agents is likely similar there are important differences in toxicity profiles, including the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia and hypertension. (3) BTKi with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb); while obinutuzumab-acalabrutinib (AO) may confer superior progression-free survival to acalabrutinib (Acala), this is not true of rituximab (Ritux) to ibrutinib (Ib)-we highlight that potential for increased side effects should be carefully considered. (4) Continuous BTKi versus time-limited venetoclax-obinutuzumab (VenO); we propose that venetoclax (Ven)-based therapy is generally preferable to BTKi with exception of TP53 aberrant disease. (5) BTKi-Ven versus VenO as preferred time-limited therapy; we discuss comparable efficacies and the concerns about simultaneous 1L exposure to both BTKi and Ven drug classes. (6) Utility of triplet therapy (BTKi-Ven-antiCD20 mAb) versus VenO; similar rates of complete response are observed yet with greater potential for adverse events. (7) Optimal therapy for TP53 aberrant CLL; while limited data are available, there are likely effective novel therapy combinations for TP53 aberrant disease including BTKi, BTKi-Ven ± antiCD20 mAb. CONCLUSION: Frontline therapy for CLL should be selected based on efficacy considering the patient specific biologic profile of their disease and potential toxicities, considering patient comorbidities and preferences. With the present paradigm of sequencing effective agents, 1L combinations of novel therapies should be used with caution in view of potential adverse events and theoretical resistance mechanism concerns in the absence of compelling randomized data to support augmented efficacy.

BTK Inhibitors in the Frontline Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.

The discovery of MYD88 (L265P) mutation led to investigating BTK inhibitors in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Ibrutinib, the first-in-class agent, was approved based on a phase II trial in relapsed/refractory patients. In the phase III iNNOVATE study, the combination of rituximab and ibrutinib was compared with rituximab and placebo in treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients. Second-generation BTK inhibitor, zanubrutinib, was compared with Ibrutinib in MYD88-mutated WM patients in the phase III ASPEN trial, whereas acalabrutinib was investigated in a phase II trial. Here, we discuss the role of BTK inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients with WM based on currently available evidence.

Efficacy and safety of first-line checkpoint inhibitors-based treatments for non-oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Frontline immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based regimens in non-oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been deeply investigated. To rank the available therapeutic options, we carried out a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ICI regimens, and a pairwise and a network meta-analysis (NMA) with an all-comers and a stratified strategy were conducted. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs involving 17 treatment regimens were included. For the all-comers population, pembrolizumab/chemotherapy (CT) and cemiplimab were most likely the best treatments. For programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1% nivolumab/ipilimumab with/without CT, for PD-L1 >1% and 1%-49% pembrolizumab/CT and for PD-L1 >50% cemiplimab ranked first for OS. In non-squamous (NSQ), pembrolizumab with/without CT ranked first for OS; cemiplimab ranked worse than the unselected population. In squamous (SQ), pooled hazard ratio (HR) showed a better chance in improving efficacy for combination strategy, while monotherapy did not, except for cemiplimab that ranked second. Atezolizumab/CT/bevacizumab ranked first in most subgroups for PFS. Direct comparison showed a non-statistically significant benefit of ICI regimens for the liver metastases cohort in OS, with a good ranking for pembrolizumab/CT and atezolizumab/bevacizumab/CT. Regarding brain metastases, all ICI regimens demonstrated an improvement in OS and PFS compared to CT. Nivolumab/ipilimumab/CT ranked better in this subset. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis updated on the most recent findings demonstrates that different ICI treatments rank differently in specific NSCLC settings (histology, biomarker and clinical presentation) offering a novel challenging scenario for clinical decision making and research planning.

The Evolving Landscape of Frontline Therapy in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of mature and maturing granulocytes. The disease is characterized by the presence of translocation t(9;22) leading to the abnormal BCR-ABL fusion. Historically, treatment options included hydroxyurea, busulfan, and interferon-α (IFN-α), with allogeneic stem cell transplant being the only potential curative therapy. More recently, the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment of CML and turned a once fatal disease into a chronic and manageable disorder. This review aims to discuss the frontline treatment options in chronic-phase CML, provide recommendations for tailoring frontline treatment to the patient, and explore emerging therapies in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: The first-generation TKI, imatinib, was FDA approved in 2001 for use in CML. Following the approval and success of imatinib, second- and third-generation TKIs have been developed providing deeper responses, faster responses, and different toxicity profiles. With numerous options available in the frontline setting, choosing the best initial treatment for each individual patient has become a more complex decision. When choosing a frontline therapy for patients with chronic-phase CML, one should consider disease risk, comorbid conditions, and the goal of therapy.

High-dose Chemotherapy Combined with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as Frontline Therapy for Intermediate/High-risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) following high-dose chemotherapy has been validated and accepted as a standard treatment for patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its clinical efficacy as frontline therapy remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of frontline auto-HSCT for newly diagnosed intermediate/high-risk DLBCL patients. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 223 patients treated with frontline auto-HSCT or chemotherapy alone (year 2008-2014) from four hospitals. The median follow-up time was 29.4 months. Between the two treatment arms among the intermediate/high-risk DLBCL patients, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of patients given frontline auto-HSCT were 87.6% and 81.9%, respectively, and the chemotherapy-alone group showed 3-year OS and PFS rates of 64.9% and 59.59%, respectively. Compared with the chemotherapy-alone group, the frontline auto-HSCT could eliminate the adverse impact of non-germinal center B-cell (GCB) type. In addition, in the frontline auto-HSCT group, patients who achieved complete response (CR) at auto-HSCT had a longer survival time than those who did not achieve CR. Our results suggested that frontline auto-HSCT could improve the prognosis of intermediate/high-risk DLBCL patients.

Changing landscape of frontline therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia has significantly evolved in recent years as our understanding of the biology of this disease has advanced. Chemoimmunotherapy has been the standard frontline treatment for patients of all age groups with chronic lymphocytic leukemia over the last decade. B-cell receptor signaling pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The advent of novel small-molecule therapy for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia targeting the B-cell receptor signaling pathway has dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape with recent studies establishing ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as the frontline treatment of choice regardless of patient's age, performance status or risk-category. Although these current advances along with the approval of other newer agents for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is a significant step forward, newer challenges have emerged on how to best utilize these new treatment options.