Can CT or MRI volumetry substitute scintigraphy in living kidney donor evaluation? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Current potential living kidney donor's assessment includes functional and anatomical evaluation. Scintigraphy is recommended in some cases and some centers include this test in the donor's protocol. Recent studies advocate for the avoidance of this test as CT or MRI volumetry showed to accurately assess donor's renal function. OBJECTIVE: To summarize scientific evidence on image tests for pre-donation and/or post-nephrectomy renal function evaluation. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review followed the guidelines set by the European Association of Urology and adhered to PRISMA 2020 recommendations. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on 10th December 2022 (ID: CRD42022379273). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria after thorough screening and eligibility assessment. According to QUADAS-2, patient selection and flow/timing domains showed a predominant low risk of bias. The correlation between split renal function (SRF) using CT and scintigraphy varied from weak (r = 0.21) to remarkably strong (r = 0.949). Bland-Altman agreement demonstrated moderate to excellent results, with mean differences ranging from -0.06% to 1.76%. The correlation between split renal volume (CT) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 months or 1 year after nephrectomy showed a moderate correlation, with coefficients ranging from 0.708 to 0.83. The correlation between SRF (MRI) and renal scintigraphy reported a moderate correlation, with correlation coefficients of 0.58 and 0.84. MRI and scintigraphy displayed a good agreement, with a 66% agreement observed and mean differences of ± 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite study heterogeneity, MRI or CT-based renal volumetry appears promising compared to scintigraphy, with favorable correlations and agreement.

Minimally invasive robotic versus conventional open living donor kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: First robotic-assisted kidney transplants (RAKT) were performed in Germany in 2016. To introduce and establish this method as a routine procedure for patients in transplantation medicine, our 2-year experiences are presented. METHODS: Non-randomized open-label cohort study to compare functional and operative results as well as complication rates between RAKT and standard open transplantation. Collected data are part of ERUS RAKT Group Registry. RESULTS: Since initiation of the RAKT program 21/27 transplantations after living kidney donations have been performed as RAKT. This represents the largest series of RAKT in Germany. Patient survival, transplant survival, and primary function rate are 100% (mean follow-up 12.9 ± 8.6 month). Mean incision to closure time was 306.1 ± 45.5, mean handling time 70.8 ± 13.1 min compared to 212.1 ± 40.6 min and 51.7 ± 9.9 min, respectively, in the standard group. Despite extended operating times using the robotic approach, comparable complication rates and graft function with significant reduction in median length of hospital stay (14 vs. 20 days) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: RAKT extends the options for recipients towards minimally invasive techniques. Compared to classic open surgery, RAKT appears to be safe in selected patients without influencing graft outcome or higher complication rates. However, RAKT till today is not suitable for all patients but seems to be one of the upcoming new standard techniques in kidney transplantation.

Impact of donor-related arteriosclerosis in pretransplant biopsy on long-term outcome of living-kidney transplantation: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term outcome and complications of living-kidney grafts with arteriosclerosis to those without abnormal findings diagnosed using pretransplant graft biopsy, and to assess the impact of the arteriosclerosis in living-donor kidneys. METHODS: The influence of arteriosclerosis in pretransplant biopsy on long-term outcomes and complications was evaluated in both unmatched (n = 1351, without arteriosclerosis n = 788 vs with arteriosclerosis n = 563) and propensity score-matched cohorts (n = 984, without arteriosclerosis n = 492 vs with arteriosclerosis n = 492) of adults who underwent living-kidney transplant. RESULTS: In both the unmatched and matched cohort, there was no significant difference in patient and death-censored graft survival at 10 years between the without arteriosclerosis and with arteriosclerosis groups. The with arteriosclerosis group had a higher incidence rate of overall rejection than did the without arteriosclerosis group in both the unmatched (P = 0.026) and matched (P = 0.060) cohorts. The with arteriosclerosis group had significantly higher chronic antibody-mediated rejection than did the without arteriosclerosis group (P = 0.006) in the unmatched cohort. The with arteriosclerosis group had a significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate in recipients, but there was no significant difference after matching. The incidence rates of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity and post-transplant anemia were significantly higher in the with arteriosclerosis group than in the without arteriosclerosis group in both the unmatched and matched cohorts. Long-term postoperative kidney function of living donors was lower in the with arteriosclerosis group. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney graft with arteriosclerosis might affect the incidence of rejection, complications and postoperative kidney function of donors. Long-term careful observation is required for both the recipients who received grafts with arteriosclerosis and the donors who had kidneys with arteriosclerosis.

Outcome of the risk-stratified desensitization protocol in donor-specific antibody-positive living kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective study.

Acceptable outcomes of donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive living kidney transplantation (LKT) have recently been reported. However, LKT in crossmatch (XM)-positive patients remains at high-risk and requires an optimal desensitization protocol. We report our intermediate-term outcomes of XM-positive LKT vs. XM-negative LKT in patients who underwent LKT between January 2012 and June 2015 in our institution. The rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) within 90 days postoperation, graft function, and patient, and graft survival rates at 4 years were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups: XM-DSA- (n = 229), XM-DSA+ (n = 36), and XM + DSA+ (n = 15). The XM + DSA+ group patients underwent desensitization with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. The rates of ABMR within 90 days in the XM-DSA-, XM-DSA+, and XM + DSA+ groups were 1.3%, 9.4%, and 60.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the graft function throughout the observational period, the 4-year patient or graft survival rates among three groups. This study showed that intermediate-term outcomes of XM-positive LKT were comparable to XM-negative LKT. However, our current desensitization protocol cannot avert ABMR within 90 days, and XM positivity is still a significant risk factor for ABMR. Further refinement of the current desensitization regimen is required.

Etiological analysis of graft dysfunction following living kidney transplantation: a report of 366 biopsies.

AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical features of graft dysfunction following living kidney transplantation and to assess its causes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 366 living kidney transplantation indication biopsies with a clear etiology and diagnosis from July 2003 to June 2016 at our center. The classifications and diagnoses were performed based on clinical and pathological characteristics. All biopsies were evaluated according to the Banff 2007 schema. RESULTS: Acute rejection (AR) occurred in 85 cases (22.0%), chronic rejection (CR) in 62 cases (16.1%), borderline rejection (BR) in 12 cases (3.1%), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity damage in 41 cases (10.6%), BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in 43 cases (11.1%), de novo or recurrent renal diseases in 134 cases (34.7%), and other causes in nine cases (2.3%); additionally, 20 cases had two simultaneous causes. The 80 cases with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) had the highest incidence (59.7%) of de novo or recurrent renal diseases. After a mean ± SD follow up of 3.7 ± 2.3 years, the 5-year graft cumulative survival rates of AR, CR, CNI toxicity, BKVAN, and de novo or recurrent renal diseases were 60.1%, 31.2%, 66.6%, 66.9%, and 67.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A biopsy is helpful for the diagnosis of graft dysfunction. De novo or recurrent renal disease, represented by IgAN, is a major cause of graft dysfunction following living kidney transplantation.

Living kidney transplantation between brothers with unrecognized renal amyloidosis as the first manifestation of familial Mediterranean fever: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by recurrent episodes of fever and polyserositis and by the onset of reactive amyloid-associated amyloidosis. Amyloidosis due to familial Mediterranean fever can lead to end-stage renal disease, culminating in kidney transplantation for some patients. In this study, we report the clinical outcome of two brothers with familial Mediterranean fever who were the inadvertent donor and recipient, respectively, of a kidney. Subsequently, they were diagnosed with renal amyloidosis secondary to familial Mediterranean fever and were successfully treated with anakinra and colchicine. CASE PRESENTATION: Two brothers with familial Mediterranean fever and renal amyloidosis were the inadvertent donor and recipient, respectively, of a kidney. The recipient had presented recurrent acute febrile episodes of familial Mediterranean fever, developed nephrotic syndrome secondary to amyloidosis and needed bilateral nephrectomy and chronic dialysis. His elder brother, in apparent good health, donated his left kidney to his brother. Immediately after the kidney transplantation, both the donor and recipient presented massive proteinuria, impaired renal function and elevated serum amyloid A levels. Biopsies of the brothers' kidneys showed amyloidosis. Genetic studies thereafter revealed a homozygous variant for the MEFV gene (NM_000243.2.c.2082G > A; p.M694I) in both brothers. At this point, both the donor and recipient were treated with colchicine and anakinra, resulting in improved renal function, decreased proteinuria, undetectable serum amyloid A levels and stable renal function at 62 months of follow-up and no major adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In familial Mediterranean fever, analyses of the MEFV gene should be performed in potential live kidney donors from a direct family member (either between siblings or between parents and children). In addition, genetic studies are required when consanguinity is suspected between members involved in the living transplant. Finally, anakinra could be a safe adjuvant therapy combined with colchicine for patients with familial Mediterranean fever and amyloidosis, including those with successful kidney transplantation.

Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation in Japanese patients: The Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation study.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the incidence rate of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors in Japanese kidney transplant recipients, and to explore which treatment components are most effective in reducing post-transplant diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We analyzed 849 Japanese non-diabetic adult recipients who had undergone living kidney transplantation and had received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression from 1996 to 2013 with a median follow-up of 5 years. RESULTS: In all, 127 patients developed post-transplant diabetes mellitus during the follow-up period. The incidence rate of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 15.1% (95% confidence interval 12.7-17.5) at 5 years. Recipient age (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.06, P < 0.001 for every 5-year increase), obesity (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.73, P = 0.028), tacrolimus trough level at 2 weeks post-transplantation (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.09, P < 0.001 for a 1-ng/mL increase) and mycophenolate mofetil use (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.77, P = 0.003) were significant predictors of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Estimated 5-year predicted incidence rate after adjusting for age and obesity was 9.4% for recipients with a low tacrolimus trough level, and receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 38.4% for recipients with a high tacrolimus trough level and not receiving mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus is a common complication in Japan, similar to that in other Western countries. The present results show that an appropriate immunosuppressive regimen with a combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil can reduce the likelihood of developing post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Recipient HLA-G +3142 CC Genotype and Concentrations of Soluble HLA-G Impact on Occurrence of CMV Infection after Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation.

The expression modulation of the immunosuppressive non-classical Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) molecule and its soluble isoforms is an immune evasion strategy being deployed by cytomegalovirus (CMV). The +3142 C>G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) located within the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) is of crucial importance for the regulation of HLA-G expression. Therefore, we analyzed the influence of the +3142 C>G HLA-G SNP on the occurrence of CMV infection in a cohort of 178 living-donor kidney recipients and their 178 corresponding donors. In addition, soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) levels were quantified before and after transplantation. The presence of the HLA-G +3142 CC genotype in recipients, but not donors of our cohort as along with elevated sHLA-G levels (≥ 6.1 ng/mL) were associated with higher susceptibility to CMV infection after transplantation. Our results provided evidence that i) HLA-G is implicated in the establishment of CMV after living-donor kidney transplantation and ii) recipient HLA-G +3142 CC genotype and sHLA-G concentration levels could represent important predictive risk markers for CMV infection.

[A CASE OF ABO INCOMPATIBLE LIVING KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN A PATIENT WITH SELECTIVE IgA DEFICIENCY].

We report a case of ABO incompatible living kidney transplantation in a 45-year-old man with selective IgA deficiency. He has been on hemodialysis for 1 year due to chronic renal failure. Although the serum anti-IgA antibody was negative, he has experienced anaphylactic reaction to red blood cell product in the past. Before the transplantation, we performed double filtration plasmapheresis for two times, but didn't performed plasma exchange, considering the possibility of producing anti-IgA antibody and anaphylactic reaction. He underwent kidney transplantation from his mother without anaphylactic reaction, following to the recirculation of renal blood flow. He was discharged on the 29th postoperative day when the serum creatinine level was 1.2 mg/dL. The graft function was stable at 8 months after transplantation with no evidence of rejection and infection.

Underutilization of Timely Kidney Transplants in Those With Living Donors.

Preemptive kidney transplant (PKTx) and kidney transplant (KTx) within 1 year of dialysis initiation have been associated with superior outcomes. Wait times should be minimal for transplants with living donors; however, there is lack of literature studying utilization of timely KTx in this population. We designed this retrospective study using data from United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files from 2000 to 2012 to assess the trends in utilization of PKTx and Early KTx (combination of PKTx or transplant within 1 year of dialysis initiation) in recipients of living donor KTx. Only 32.6% transplants were PKTx, and 61.9% were Early KTx. A significant improvement in proportion of PKTx was seen from 27.5% in 2000 to 35.4% in 2006, with no change since. Similarly, the proportion of Early KTx increased from 61.4% in 2000 to 63.6% in 2006, with no increase since. Similar results were seen after adjusted analysis and were independent of living donor type. Although there was some improvement in utilization of timely transplants in the early part of the last decade, there has been no improvement since. Considering the benefits of timely kidney transplant, it is important to understand the reasons behind the same and to improve utilization.

Association between body mass index and outcomes in Japanese living kidney transplant recipients: The role of sex differences.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of pretransplant body mass index on graft failure and mortality in Japanese patients undergoing living kidney transplant. METHODS: A cohort of 888 living kidney transplant recipients who received standard immunosuppressive therapy between 2000 and 2013 were identified from the Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation database. Pretransplant body mass index was divided into three categories according to the following tertiles: <19.4, 19.5-22.2 and ≥22.3 kg/m(2) . A multivariable time-to-event analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Estimated hazard ratios of the body mass index effects regarding graft failure were 1.62 (95% confidence interval 0.83-3.18) for the first tertile and 2.20 (95% confidence interval 1.24-3.90) for the third tertile. Patient mortality was 1.21 (95% confidence interval 0.32-4.54) for the first tertile and 1.52 (95% confidence interval 0.56-4.13) for the third tertile. In a subgroup analysis, the effects of body mass index according to sex were substantially heterogeneous (P = 0.029 for interaction). Pretransplant body mass index had a non-linear J-shaped association with graft failure that resulted from qualitative interaction between body mass index and the recipient's sex. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences and interaction effects must be considered when evaluating the effects of pretransplant body mass index on post-transplant outcomes in Japanese patients undergoing living kidney transplant.

Changes in presepsin concentrations in surgical patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing living kidney transplantation: a pilot study.

Presepsin is a useful marker for differentiating sepsis from non-infection-related systemic inflammatory response syndrome. There are data describing elevated presepsin concentrations in patients with kidney dysfunction even in the absence of sepsis, but corresponding data for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing living kidney transplantation (LKT) are lacking. We investigated the changes in presepsin concentrations in this patient group in order to elucidate any relationship with renal function. Written informed consent was obtained from patients with ESKD requiring hemodialysis who underwent LKT from June 2014 through March 2015 at Hirosaki University Hospital. Patients with obvious signs of infection were excluded. Perioperative presepsin and procalcitonin concentrations were measured before induction of anesthesia, on admission to the intensive care unit after surgery, and on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2. Preoperative presepsin concentration was markedly higher than the upper limit of normal in patients with ESKD (1252 ± 451 pg/mL). Presepsin concentrations consistently decreased after LKT. Moreover, presepsin concentration was strongly correlated with serum creatinine (r (2) = 0.72, n = 24, p < 0.001). These data suggest that the kidney clearly plays an important role in the metabolism and excretion of presepsin.

[Promoting Living Kidney Transplantation].

Kidney transplantation is the best approach for treating patients with end stage renal disease, offering patients the best chance of returning to normal health. While the techniques used in kidney transplantation surgery are mature and highly successful, there is a severe shortage of donor organs. Statistics show a serious imbalance between organ donations and patients on the waiting list for organ transplantation. Moreover, evidence from empirical studies has shown a better transplantation outcome for patients who receive living donor transplantation than for those who receive organs from cadavers. Although using relatives as donors offers an effective way to reduce the problem of organ shortage, this strategy faces many challenges and many other factors affect the promotion of living donor transplantation. This article elaborates how cultural and psychological factors, kidney transplantation awareness, and ethics and laws impact upon living kidney donations and then proposes coping strategies for promoting living kidney transplantation.

First experiences with machine learning predictions of accelerated declining eGFR slope of living kidney donors 3 years after donation.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donors are screened pre-donation to estimate the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We evaluate Machine Learning (ML) to predict the progression of kidney function deterioration over time using the estimated GFR (eGFR) slope as the target variable. METHODS: We included 238 living kidney donors who underwent donor nephrectomy. We divided the dataset based on the eGFR slope in the third follow-up year, resulting in 185 donors with an average eGFR slope and 53 donors with an accelerated declining eGFR-slope. We trained three Machine Learning-models (Random Forest [RF], Extreme Gradient Boosting [XG], Support Vector Machine [SVM]) and Logistic Regression (LR) for predictions. Predefined data subsets served for training to explore whether parameters of an ESKD risk score alone suffice or additional clinical and time-zero biopsy parameters enhance predictions. Machine learning-driven feature selection identified the best predictive parameters. RESULTS: None of the four models classified the eGFR slope with an AUC greater than 0.6 or an F1 score surpassing 0.41 despite training on different data subsets. Following machine learning-driven feature selection and subsequent retraining on these selected features, random forest and extreme gradient boosting outperformed other models, achieving an AUC of 0.66 and an F1 score of 0.44. After feature selection, two predictive donor attributes consistently appeared in all models: smoking-related features and glomerulitis of the Banff Lesion Score. CONCLUSIONS: Training machine learning-models with distinct predefined data subsets yielded unsatisfactory results. However, the efficacy of random forest and extreme gradient boosting improved when trained exclusively with machine learning-driven selected features, suggesting that the quality, rather than the quantity, of features is crucial for machine learning-model performance. This study offers insights into the application of emerging machine learning-techniques for the screening of living kidney donors.

Association of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant and 1-Year Outcome of Living Kidney Transplantation in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Because most kidney transplantations in Japan are performed on the basis of living donors, after-transplant outcomes should achieve optimum results, overcoming participants' possible reduced adherence. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the Japanese version of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT-J) and outcomes, 1 year after the patient's living kidney transplant (LKT). METHODS: The prospective cohort study was undertaken at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to July 2021, with a 1-year follow-up period. The SIPAT-J assesses 18 psychosocial risk factors: (1) Patient's Readiness Level and Illness Management (SIPAT A), (2) Social Support System Level of Readiness (SIPAT B), (3) Psychological Stability and Psychopathology (SIPAT C), and (4) Lifestyle and Effect of Substance Use (SIPAT D). The evaluators, a psychiatrist and 3 clinical psychologists, conducted an independent, blinded application of the SIPAT-J using participants' medical records. The study focused on physical composite outcomes, psychiatric outcomes, and nonadherent behaviors. RESULTS: The participants were 173 LKT recipients (median age [interquartile range], 51 [38-59]); 67.1% were male and 67.1% were employed. The median (interquartile range) SIPAT scores were SIPAT A [7 (5-9)], SIPAT B [7 (5-9)], SIPAT C [2 (0-4)], SIPAT D [3 (3-4)], and SIPAT total [20 (16-23)]. The physical composite outcome was 25 (14.5%), psychiatric outcome 9 (5.2%), and nonadherent behavior 17 (9.8%). SIPAT C (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-1.72, P = 0.02) was significantly associated with the psychiatric outcome. SIPAT B (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-1.98, P = 0.01) and SIPAT total (odds ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.24, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with nonadherent behaviors. There was no significant association between the SIPAT and physical composite outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to examine the association between SIPAT and physical and psychiatric outcomes 1 year after LKT, controlling for follow-up periods and factors other than SIPAT. Comprehensive psychosocial assessment before LKT and early identification of factors that may negatively affect transplant success can allow targeted interventions to be implemented and increase the likelihood of favorable recipient outcomes.

Donor Evaluation of Living Kidney Transplantation in the Aging Society.

BACKGROUND: Because of the lack of organ donation, living kidney transplantation (LKT) is increasing worldwide. Recently, the number of elderly donors has been increasing, and the patients with end-stage kidney diseases are older than those in the previous decades. Due to the advanced ages, their glomerular filtration rates (GFR) decrease, and the comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetic condition, and obesity are common. The clinicians now have to give their unwilling consent to the LKT from the donors with expanded criteria. SUMMARY: For the secure selection of donors, proper GFR measuring is essential. Although directly measured GFR (mGFR) was recommended in the guidelines, estimated GFR (eGFR) is used at the initial evaluation of donor renal function clinically. Many equations calculating eGFR have been published so far. In the selection of eGFR equations, the smaller difference between mGFR and eGFR and the closer relationship to the prevalence rates of comorbidities are requisite points. Therefore, we compared the specificity of the various eGFR equations. The eGFR calculated from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation showed approximate reliability with minimal difference between mGFR and eGFR and the closer relationships to the prevalence rates of comorbidities. KEY MESSAGE: The CKD-EPI-eGFR presented optimal performance in the donor renal function evaluation. Therefore, eGFR from the CKD-EPI equation is highly recommended in evaluating renal function in LKT donors.

Coping with a lack of evidence: living-donor kidney transplantation in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Due to immunosuppressive therapy, transplant patients are more susceptible to viral and bacterial infections. A potentially deadly new virus haunted us in 2020: SARS-CoV­2, causing coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). We analyzed the consequences of this previously unknown risk for our living-donor transplant program in the first year of the pandemic. After the complete lockdown in spring 2020, our transplant center in Linz resumed the living-donor kidney transplantation program from June to September 2020, between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Austria. We compared the outcomes of these living-donor kidney transplantations with the transplant outcomes of the corresponding periods of the three previous years. From June 4 to September 9, 2020, five living-donor kidney transplantations were performed. All donors and recipients were screened for COVID 19 infection by PCR testing the day before surgery. Kidney transplant recipients remained isolated in single rooms until discharge from hospital. All recipients and donors remained SARS-CoV­2 negative during the follow-up of 10 months and have been fully vaccinated to date. The number of living transplants in the studied period of 2020 was constant compared to the same months of 2017, 2018, and 2019. Living-donor kidney transplantation can be continued using testing for SARS-CoV­2 and meticulous hygienic precautions in epidemiologically favorable phases of the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic. Donors and recipients should be carefully selected and informed about risks and benefits.

Bone Fragment Co-transplantation Alongside Bone Marrow Aspirate Infusion Protects Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Integration of non-vascularized bone grafting and bone marrow aspirate infusion in transplantation may provide clinical benefit. Here we have incorporated bone fragment co-transplantation and bone marrow aspirate infusion (BF-BM) into living kidney transplantation (LKT). Twenty LKT recipients receiving bone fragments and bone marrow aspirates donated from their corresponding donors were enrolled into a retrospective study. A contemporaneous control group was formed of 38 out of 128 conventional LKT recipients, selected using propensity score matching by a 1:2 Greedy algorithm. Ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US/CEUS) and SPECT/CT showed that the co-transplanted bone fragments remained viable for 6 months, subsequently shrank, and finally degenerated 10 months post-transplantation. BF-BM resulted in earlier kidney recovery and more robust long-term kidney function. Throughout 5 years of follow-up, BF-BM had regulatory effects on dendritic cells (DCs), T helper (Th1/Th2) cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Both alloantigen-specific lymphocyte proliferation and panel reactive antibody levels were negative in all recipients with or without BF-BM. In addition, the BF-BM group experienced few complications during the 5-year follow-up (as did the donors)-this was not different from the controls. In conclusion, BF-BM is safe and benefits recipients by protecting the kidney and regulating the immune response.

Study of Glomerulopathy in Donors after Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Living kidney donation improves the lives of individuals with kidney failure; however, recent studies have suggested that living kidney donors may be at a relatively higher risk of reduced renal function than healthy non-donors. We therefore aimed to evaluate the clinical and pathological findings in living kidney donors who developed kidney disease. METHODS: From January 1991 to May 2019, 1,625 live kidney donations were performed at our hospital. Among the donors, 7 developed kidney disease after donation and underwent open renal biopsy. We studied the clinical and pathological findings of these patients from their clinical records. RESULTS: There were 3 patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, 2 with membranous nephropathy, 1 with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis, and 1 with secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). All patients with IgA nephropathy had latent IgA deposition on their baseline biopsy. One patient with membranous nephropathy demonstrated findings of membranous nephropathy on the baseline biopsy, despite being asymptomatic. All patients, except for those with ANCA-associated nephropathy and secondary FSGS, recovered from the nephritis or maintained an adequate renal function after treatment. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Baseline biopsy is necessary for assessing the renal condition of kidney donors, and these donors require long-term follow-up based on their baseline biopsy findings. If donors develop kidney disease, appropriate diagnosis and treatment are essential.