Incidence and impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) following open esophagectomy has been associated with increased rates of pulmonary and anastomotic complications, and mortality. This study seeks to evaluate effects of AF after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). A retrospective review of patients consecutively treated with MIE for esophageal carcinoma, dysplasia. and benign disease from November 2006 to November 2011 was performed. One hundred twenty-one patients underwent MIE. Median age was 65 years (range 26-88) with 85% being male. Thirty-eight (31.4%) patients developed AF postoperatively. Of these 38 patients, 7 (18.4%) had known AF preoperatively. Patients with postoperative AF were significantly older than those without postoperative AF (68.7 vs. 62.8 years, P = 0.008) and more likely to be male (94.7% vs. 80.7%, P = 0.04). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation showed a trend toward increased risk of AF (73.7% vs 56.6%, P = 0.07). Sixty-day mortality was 2 of 38 (5.3%) in patients with AF and 4 of 83 (6.0%) in the no AF cohort (P = 1.00). The group with AF had increased length of hospitalization (13.4 days vs. 10.6 days P = 0.02). No significant differences in rates of pneumonia (31.6% vs. 21.7% P = 0.24), stricture (13.2% vs. 26.5% P = 0.10), or leak requiring return to operating room (13.2% vs. 8.4% P = 0.51) were noted between groups. We did not find an increased rate of AF in our MIE cohort compared with prior reported rates in open esophagectomy populations. AF did result in an increased length of stay but was not a predictor of other short-term morbidities including anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications, stenosis, or 60-day mortality.

Benefits of camrelizumab plus carboplatin and albumin paclitaxel as induction therapy for locally advanced borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin in the neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 27 patients with borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment with camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2020 to March 2022. Of these, 20 patients underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 88.9% (24/27) of patients completed neoadjuvant treatment. The objective response rate was 79.2% (19/24) according to the RECIST criteria. Of the 20 patients who underwent surgery, the R0 resection rate was 95%, and 35% (7/20) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). During neoadjuvant treatment, 30% (6/20) of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and 20% (4/20) had grade ≥3 postoperative complications. There were no cases of reoperation or perioperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin were found to be safe and effective in the neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. It was observed to improve the rate of curative resection without increasing perioperative complications.

The impact of radiation dose on the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To investigate the impact of radiation dose on the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy(dCCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) were searched for eligible studies. Studies that compared high-dose radiation(HD-RT) group with low-dose radiation(LD-RT) group using modern radiotherapy techniques for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients in dCCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the odds ratios (OR) for clinical complete response (cCR), local-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and grade≥3 AEs. Meta-analysis was performed when relevant data were available. Eleven studies involving 1943 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the HD-RT group had better OS (pooled HR 0.78 [0.70, 0.87], p < .00001), PFS (pooled HR 0.72 [0.55, 0.94], p = .01), cCR (OR 1.52 [1.13, 2.05], p = .005), and LRF (OR 0.60 [0.45, 0.80], p = .0004). In addition, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of DM (OR 1.43 [1.00, 2.04], p = .05), grade 3-5 radiation pneumonitis (OR 1.38 [0.71, 2.68], p = .35), grade 3-5 radiation esophagitis (OR 1.36 [0.88, 2.10], p = .17), grade 3-5 other esophageal toxicities(stenosis/fistula/hemorrhage) (OR 1.22 [0.75, 2.00], p = .43), and treatment-related death (OR 1.40 [0.73, 2.68], p = .31). High-dose radiotherapy in definitive CCRT for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is associated with improved PFS, OS, cCR, and LC with no increase of grade≥3AEs. Simultaneously, we await the preliminary and final results of several ongoing dose-escalation randomized trials. Furthermore, future studies should provide personalized radiotherapy doses for these patients.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Objective: The progress of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer has been stagnant. There has been much progress in immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer, but the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer have not yet been definitively demonstrated. Methods: Original articles describing the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophagus published until July 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to conduct heterogeneity and subgroup analysis. Results: In total, 759 patients from 21 studies were enrolled. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated using the major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (PCR). In the enrolled patients, 677 were treated surgically and 664 achieved R0 resection. Major pathological remission was achieved in 52.0% (95% CI: 0.44-0.57) of patients on neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and complete pathological remission in 29.5% (95% CI: 0.25-0.32) of patients. The safety was primarily assessed by the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and surgical resection rates. The incidence of TRAEs and the surgical resection rate combined ORs were 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.22) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer is effective and safe.

Multimodality management of esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is a highly lethal and aggressive disease and a major public health problem worldwide. The incidence of esophageal cancer in the western hemisphere has increased by 400 % in the past few decades (Posner et al. 2011). Surgery is the mainstay of definitive management of esophageal cancer; however, the results of surgery alone have been dismal, with survival rates of approximately 15 to 20 % at 5 years (Hingorani et al., Clin Oncol 23:696-705, 2011). The last three decades have seen growing interest in various adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies, with an aim to improve disease control and overall survival. However, due to conflicting and often contradictory results, there was controversy on the ideal treatment paradigm. Recent evidence suggests an improvement in overall survival with neoadjuvant therapy, both chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, over surgery. In this review we address various issues concerning multimodality management of locally advanced esophageal cancers: Does neoadjuvant therapy offer a definite benefit over surgery alone? If so, which neoadjuvant strategy? Does the survival benefit outweigh the increased treatment related toxicity/morbidity? Finally, is neoadjuvant treatment the standard of care for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer?