Severe maternal morbidity in Scotland.

Using a cohort study design, we analysed 17 diagnoses and 9 interventions (including critical care admission) as a composite measure of severe maternal morbidity for pregnancies recorded over 14 years in Scotland. There were 762,918 pregnancies, of which 7947 (10 in 1000 pregnancies) recorded 9345 severe maternal morbidity events, 2802 episodes of puerperal sepsis being the most common (30%). Severe maternal morbidity incidence increased from 9 in 1000 pregnancies in 2012 to 17 in 1000 pregnancies in 2018, due in part to puerperal sepsis recording. The odds ratio (95%CI) for severe maternal morbidity was higher for: older women, for instance 1.22 (1.13-1.33) for women aged 35-39 years and 1.44 (1.27-1.63) for women aged > 40 years compared with those aged 25-29 years; obese women, for instance 1.13 (1.06-1.21) for BMI 30-40 kg.m-2 and 1.32 (1.15-1.51) for BMI > 40 kg.m-2 compared with BMI 18.5-24.9 kg.m-2 ; multiple pregnancy, 2.39 (2.09-2.74); and previous caesarean delivery, 1.52 (1.40-1.65). The median (IQR [range]) hospital stay was 3 (2-5 [1-8]) days with severe maternal morbidity and 2 (1-3 [1-5]) days without. Forty-one women died during pregnancy or up to 42 days after delivery, representing mortality rates per 100,000 pregnancies of about 365 with severe maternal morbidity and 1.6 without. There were 1449 women admitted to critical care, 807 (58%) for mechanical ventilation or support of at least two organs. We recorded an incidence of severe maternal morbidity higher than previously published, possibly because sepsis was coded inaccurately in our databases. Further research may determine the value of this composite measure of severe maternal morbidity.

Critical care in obstetrics: a strategy for addressing maternal mortality.

The acute rise in maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States is in part because of an increasingly medically complex obstetrical population. An estimated 1% to 3% of all obstetrical patients require intensive care, making timely delivery and availability of critical care imperative. The shifting landscape in obstetrical acuity places a burden on obstetrical providers, many of whom have limited experience in identifying and responding to critical illness. The levels of maternal care definitions by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine designate hospitals based on the availability of obstetrical resources and highlight the need for critical care resources and expertise. The growing need for critical care skills in the evolving contemporary obstetrical landscape serves as an opportunity to redefine the concept of delivery of care for high-risk obstetrical patients. We summarized the key tenets in the prevention of maternal morbidity and mortality, including the use of evidence-based tools for risk stratification and timely referral of patients to facilities with appropriate resources; innovative pathways for hospitals to provide critical care consultations on labor and delivery; and training of obstetrical providers in high-yield critical care skills, such as point-of-care ultrasonography. These critical care-focused interventions are key in addressing an increasingly complex obstetrical patient population while providing an educational foundation for the training of future obstetrical providers.

What factors influence midwives to provide obstetric high dependency care on the delivery suite or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit? Findings of a focus group study.

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, midwives will engage in discussions with the multidisciplinary team as to whether they can provide Obstetric High Dependency Care (OHDC) on the Delivery Suite or whether a woman's care should be escalated to the critical care team. This study aimed to explore the question: What factors influence midwives to provide OHDC or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit in hospitals remote from tertiary referral centres? METHODS: Focus groups were undertaken with midwives (n = 34) across three obstetric units in England, with annual birth rates ranging from 1500 to 5000 per annum, in District General Hospitals. Three scenarios in the form of video vignettes of handover were used as triggers for the focus groups. Scenario 1; severe pre-eclampsia, physiologically unstable 2; major postpartum haemorrhage requiring invasive monitoring 3; recent admission of woman with chest pain receiving facial oxygen and requiring continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Two focus groups were conducted in each of the obstetric units with experienced midwives. Data were analysed using a qualitative framework approach. RESULTS: Factors influencing midwives' care escalation decisions included the care environment, a woman's diagnosis and fetal or neonatal factors. The overall plan of care including the need for ECG and invasive monitoring were also influential factors. Midwives in the smallest obstetric unit did not have access to the facilities for OHDC provision. Midwives in the larger obstetric units provided OHDC but identified varying degrees of skill and sometimes used 'workarounds' to facilitate care provision. Midwifery staffing levels, skill mix and workload were also influential. Some differences of opinion were evident between midwives working in the same obstetric units as to whether OHDC could be provided and the support they would enlist to help them provide it. Reliance on clinical guidelines appeared variable. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that there may be inequitable OHDC provision at a local level. Organisationally robust systems are required to promote safe, equitable OHDC care including skills development for midwives and precise escalation guidelines to minimise workarounds. Training for midwives must include strategies that prevent skills fade.

Maternal super obesity and risk for intensive care unit admission in the MFMU Cesarean Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a risk factor for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in nonpregnant populations. Less is known about maternal obesity and ICU admission risk. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between maternal obesity and ICU admission among women who delivered via cesarean section or vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of women who delivered via VBAC or cesarean section in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Cesarean Registry. We defined exposure as body mass index (BMI) at delivery stratified as non-obese (BMI 18.5-29.9 kg/m2 ), class I or II obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2 ), morbidly obese (BMI 40-49.9 kg/m2 ), and super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 ). The primary outcome was ICU admission. Modified Poisson regression models estimated relative risk (RR) of ICU admission by obesity strata, after adjusting for confounders. Mediation analysis was used to estimate the proportion of ICU admission risk attributable specifically to obesity. RESULTS: We included 68 455 women; 40% non-obese, 46% class I or II obese, 12% morbidly obese, and 2% super obese. Super obese women were at higher risk for ICU admission compared with non-obese women (0.7 vs. 1.3%, adjusted RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.01-2.65), after adjusting for confounders. Among super obese women, medical comorbidities mediated 58% of ICU admission risk, suggesting that a significant proportion of ICU admission is driven by maternal obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Super obese women who deliver by cesarean section or VBAC are at increased risk of peripartum ICU admission. Obstetricians and critical care specialists should consider possible ICU admission during delivery planning.

Measuring the impact of maternal critical care admission on short- and longer-term maternal and birth outcomes.

PURPOSE: Factors increasing the risk of maternal critical illness are rising in prevalence in maternity populations. Studies of general critical care populations highlight that severe illness is associated with longer-term physical and psychological morbidity. We aimed to compare short- and longer-term outcomes between women who required critical care admission during pregnancy/puerperium and those who did not. METHODS: This is a cohort study including all women delivering in Scottish hospitals between 01/01/2005 and 31/12/2018, using national healthcare databases. The primary exposure was intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while secondary exposures included high dependency unit admission. Outcomes included hospital readmission (1-year post-hospital discharge, 1-year mortality, psychiatric hospital admission, stillbirth, and neonatal critical care admission). Multivariable Cox and logistic regression were used to report hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) of association between ICU admission and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 762,918 deliveries, 1449 (0.18%) women were admitted to ICU, most commonly due to post-partum hemorrhage (225, 15.5%) followed by eclampsia/pre-eclampsia (133, 9.2%). Over-half (53.8%) required mechanical ventilation. One-year hospital readmission was more frequent in women admitted to ICU compared with non-ICU populations [24.5% (n = 299) vs 8.9% (n = 68,029)]. This association persisted after confounder adjustment (HR 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33, 2.81, p < 0.001). Furthermore, maternal ICU admission was associated with increased 1-year mortality (HR 40.06, 95% CI 24.04, 66.76, p < 0.001), stillbirth (OR 12.31, 95% CI 7.95,19.08, p < 0.001) and neonatal critical care admission (OR 6.99, 95% CI 5.64,8.67, p < 0.001) after confounder adjustment. CONCLUSION: Critical care admission increases the risk of adverse short-term and long-term maternal, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Optimizing long-term post-partum care may benefit maternal critical illness survivors.

Obstetric units' preparedness to manage critically ill women. The second report from the MaCriCare study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the availability of 31 distinct services and facilities to diagnose, resuscitate, and treat critically unwell obstetric patients. METHODS: Using a network of anesthesiologists, intensive care clinicians, obstetricians, critical care nurses, and midwives (MaCriCare) from September 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a descriptive international multicenter cross-sectional survey in centers with obstetric units (OUs) in the WHO Europe Region. RESULTS: The MaCriCare network covers 26 countries and received 1133 responses, corresponding to 2.5 million annual deliveries. The survey identified significant disparities in the availability of the measured 31 services among the OUs, with some services not immediately available and some not available at all. Point-of-care hemoglobin measurements were lacking in 13.8% of OUs. 15.2% of OUs lacked pointof-care lactate measurement, and 11% lacked transfusion services. 23.8% of OUs lacked the ability to administer hypotensive agent infusions in the labor ward. Samebuilding access to cell saver and thromboelastometry was unavailable to 45.5% and 64.4% of OUs, respectively. Access to invasive ventilation was unavailable to 3.4% of OUs, 11.7% were unable to offer same-building access to non-invasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation was unavailable to 38.3% of the OUs. CONCLUSION: Critically ill obstetric patients have access to markedly different resources in the WHO Europe Region depending on the OU where they are managed. Consensus on which facilities and services should be universally available is urgently needed.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pregnancy and peripartum: a focused review.

As the medical complexity of pregnant patients increases, the rate of maternal morbidity has risen. Maternal cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality followed closely by sepsis and infection, both of which may be associated with respiratory failure. There has been an expansion in the application of extracorporeal life support in pregnant and peripartum patients which requires obstetric anesthesiologists to understand the indications, obstetric and medical considerations, relative advantages and potential complications of this invasive technology in this population. Obstetricians and anesthesiologists who care for women on the labor floor must strive to recognize at-risk and deteriorating patients, facilitate escalation of care when appropriate, and engage consultant teams to consider the need for extracorporeal support in high-risk circumstances. This article reviews the epidemiology, indications, specific considerations, potential complications, and outcomes of extracorporeal life support in pregnant and peripartum patients.

Preparedness for severe maternal morbidity in European hospitals: The MaCriCare study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate obstetric units (OUs) and intensive care units (ICUs) preparedness for severe maternal morbidity (SMM). METHODS: From September 2021 to January 2022, an international multicentre cross-sectional study surveyed OUs in 26 WHO Europe Region countries. We assessed modified early obstetric warning score usage (MEOWS), approaches to four SMM clinical scenarios, invasive monitoring availability in OUs, and access to high-dependency units (HDUs) and onsite ICUs. Within ICUs, we examined the availability of trained staff, response to obstetric emergencies, leadership, and data collection. RESULTS: 1133 responses were evaluated. MEOWS use was 34.5%. Non-obstetric early warning scores were being used. 21.4% (242) of OUs provided invasive monitoring in the OU. A quarter lacked access to onsite HDU beds. In cases of SMM, up to 13.8% of all OUs indicated the need for transfer to another hospital. The transfer rate was highest (74.0%) in small units. 81.9% of centers provided onsite ICU facilities to obstetric patients. Over 90% of the onsite ICUs provided daily specialist obstetric reviews but lacked immediate access to key resources: 3.4% - uterotonic drugs, 7.5% - neonatal resuscitation equipment, 9.2% - neonatal resuscitation team, 11.4% - perimortem cesarean section equipment. 41.2% reported obstetric data to a national database. CONCLUSION: Gaps in provision exist for obstetric patients with SMM in Europe, potentially compromising patient safety and experience. MEOWS use in OUs was low, while access to invasive monitoring and onsite HDU and ICU facilities was variable. ICUs frequently lacked resources and did not universally collect obstetric data for quality control.

Critical pregnancy at altitude: A look at Latin America.

Critical pregnancy at high altitudes increases morbidity and mortality from 2500 m above sea level. In addition to altitude, there are other influential factors such as social inequalities, cultural, prehospital barriers, and lack the appropriate development of healthcare infrastructure. The most frequent causes of critical pregnancy leading to admission to Intensive Care Units are pregnancy hypertensive disorders (native residents seem to be more protected), hemorrhages and infection/sepsis. In Latin America, there are 32 Intensive Care Units above 2500 m above sea level. Arterial blood gases at altitude are affected by changes in barometric pressure. The analysis of their values provides very useful information for the management of obstetric emergencies at very high altitude, especially respiratory and metabolic pathologies.

Anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: A case report.

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA) is a rare form of congenital heart disease often associated with other cardiac defects. The adaptations and physiologic changes in pregnancy can present maternal challenges and complications; multidisciplinary care allows for the safest management of pregnancy and delivery in these patients. We present a case of the anesthetic management of cesarean delivery in a woman with CCTGA with her pregnancy complicated by recurrent volume overload, pulmonary hypertension, and dysrhythmias.

The need for maternal critical care education, point-of-care ultrasound and critical care echocardiography in obstetric anesthesiologists training.

Globally, the increase in medically complex obstetric patients is challenging the educational approach and clinical management of critically ill obstetric patients. This increase in medical complexity calls into question the educational paradigm in which future physicians are trained. Obstetric anesthesiologists, physician experts in the perio-perative planning and management of complex obstetric patients, represent an essential workforce in the strategies to address maternal mortality. Unfortunately, the development of peri-operative medicine and maternal critical care curricula has only received minor attention in most countries. Proposed guidelines and models highlight the existing need for tiered maternity care services in which critical care infrastructure plays a central role in the delivery of high-risk peripartum care. Therefore, the development of maternal critical care models designed to prepare obstetric anesthesiologists for the clinical challenges of a medically complex patient are warranted. Key critical care topics such as advanced ultrasonography, with the inclusion of quantitative echocardiographic assessments into obstetric anesthesiology educational curricula, will serve to better prepare physicians for the realities of an increasingly complex pregnant patient population, and further reinforce the critical care infrastructure detailed in the Levels of Maternal Care consensus. Despite an increasingly complex obstetric patient population, heterogeneity of maternal critical care practices exists across the globe, warranting standardization and further development of proposed curricula.

Epoprostenol Exposure During Pregnancy.

Institutional policies restricting pregnant providers from caring for patients receiving inhaled epoprostenol exist across the nation based on little to no data to substantiate this practice. Over the last 2 decades, the use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators has expanded in patients with cardiac and respiratory disease providing more evidence for the safety of these medications in obstetrical patients. We propose a thoughtful consideration and review of the literature to remove this restriction to reduce the need to reveal early pregnancy status to employers, to alleviate undue stress for pregnant caregivers who are exposed to patients receiving epoprostenol, and to ensure safe, equal employment, and learning opportunities for pregnant providers.

The time is now: addressing the need for training in maternal critical care medicine.

Amongst many high-income countries, indirect medical conditions (e.g. cardiovascular disease, sepsis) now account for the majority of maternal deaths. In response to this concerning rise in indirect causes of maternal deaths, professional societies have developed guidelines that regionalize high-risk obstetric care and prioritize critical care expertise as a requirement for designated 'top' maternity hospitals. Critical care proficiency is mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for graduating obstetric anesthesiology fellows. Despite these requirements, no formal obstetric critical care educational curricula or fellowship pathways, combining critical care medicine and obstetric anesthesiology, currently exist. Dual subspecialty training in both obstetric anesthesiology and critical care medicine represents one strategy to improve the care of critically-ill obstetric patients and reduce maternal mortality and morbidity, which is one of the pressing healthcare issues of our time.

Pregnant and Postpartum Women Requiring Intensive Care Treatment for COVID-19-First Data from the CRONOS-Registry.

(1) Background: Data on coronavirus 2 infection during pregnancy vary. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics and clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 positive women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 during pregnancy and postpartum period based on data of a comprehensive German surveillance system in obstetric patients. (2) Methods: Data from COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS), a prospective multicenter registry for SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women, was analyzed with respect to ICU treatment. All women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 were included and compared regarding maternal characteristics, course of disease, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes. (3) Results: Of 2650 cases in CRONOS, 101 women (4%) had a documented ICU stay. Median maternal age was 33 (IQR, 30-36) years. COVID-19 was diagnosed at a median gestational age of 33 (IQR, 28-35) weeks. As the most invasive form of COVID-19 treatment interventions, patients received either continuous monitoring of vital signs without further treatment requirement (n = 6), insufflation of oxygen (n = 30), non-invasive ventilation (n = 22), invasive ventilation (n = 28), or escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 15). No significant clinical differences were identified between patients receiving different forms of ventilatory support for COVID-19. Prevalence of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women receiving invasive respiratory treatments. Four women died of COVID-19 and six fetuses were stillborn. (4) Conclusions: Our cohort shows that progression of COVID-19 is rare in pregnant and postpartum women treated in the ICU. Preterm birth rate is high and COVID-19 requiring respiratory support increases the risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcome.

[COVID-19 in obstetric anesthesia : Prospective surveillance of peripartum infections with SARS-CoV-2 and peripartum course of disease in affected women]. / COVID-19 in der geburtshilflichen Anästhesie : Prospektive Erfassung von SARS-CoV-2-Infektionen zum Zeitpunkt der Geburt sowie des peripartalen Verlaufs SARS-CoV-2-positiver Schwangerer.

BACKGROUND: In the current pandemic regarding the infection with the SARS-CoV-2-virus and COVID-19 as the disease, concerns about pregnant women, effects on childbirth and the health of the newborn remain high. Initially, due to the early manifestation of the disease in younger patients, high numbers of COVID-19 patients in women needing peripartum care were expected. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to provide a general overview over the beginning of the pandemic as well as the second wave of infections in Germany and Switzerland, regarding SARS-CoV­2 positive pregnant women hospitalized for childbirth. We therefore launched a registry to gain timely information over the dynamic situation during the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As part of the COVID-19-related Obstetric Anesthesia Longitudinal Assessment (COALA) registry, centers reported weekly birth rates, numbers of suspected SARS-CoV­2 cases, as well as the numbers of confirmed cases between 16 March and 3 May 2020. Data acquisition was continued from 18 October 2020 till 28 February 2021. The data were analyzed regarding distribution of SARS-CoV­2 positive pregnant women hospitalized for childbirth between centers, calendar weeks and birth rates as well as maternal characteristics, course of disease and outcomes of SARS-CoV­2 positive pregnant women. RESULTS: A total of 9 German centers reported 2270 deliveries over 7 weeks during the first wave of infections including 3 SARS-CoV­2 positive cases and 9 suspected cases. During the second survey period, 6 centers from Germany and Switzerland reported 41 positive cases out of 4897 deliveries. One woman presented with a severe and ultimately fatal course of the disease, while another one needed prolonged ECMO treatment. Of the women 28 presented with asymptomatic infections and 6 neonates were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit for further treatment. There was one case of neonatal SARS-CoV­2 infection. CONCLUSION: The number of pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV­2 was at a very low level at the time of delivery, with only sporadic suspected or confirmed cases. Due to the lack of comprehensive testing in the first survey period, however, a certain number of asymptomatic cases are to be assumed. Of the cases 68% presented as asymptomatic or as mild courses of disease but the data showed that even in young healthy patients without the presence of typical risk factors, serious progression can occur. These outcomes should raise awareness for anesthesiologists, obstetricians, pediatricians and intensive care physicians to identify severe cases of COVID-19 in pregnant women during childbirth and to take the necessary precautions to ensure the best treatment of mother and neonate. The prospective acquisition of data allowed a timely assessment of the highly dynamic situation and gain knowledge regarding this vulnerable group of patients.

Pregnancy related and postpartum admissions to intensive care unit in the obstetric tertiary care center - an 8-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to analyze the incidence of maternal morbidity and mortality of pregnant and postpartum women admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all pregnant and postpartum patients admitted to ICU of the obstetric tertiary care center between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients with pregnancy and postpartum related morbidity were admitted to ICU (12.56 per 1000 deliveries). It accounted for 21.08% of all adult admissions of the unit. Mean age was 30.2 ± 5.6 years, mean gestational age was 30.8 ± 7.6 weeks. Two hundred forty patients (90.23%) were primiparous, 17 (6.4%) were twin pregnancy. Main reasons of admission included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy n = 99 (37.22%; 4.68 per 1000 deliveries), hemorrhage n = 46 (17.29%; 2.17 per 1000 deliveries) and sepsis/infection n = 46 (17.29%; 2.17 per 1000 deliveries). Median length of stay was five days (IQR 4-7). Artificial ventilation was required in 91 patients (34.21%), 147 (55.26%) required vasoactive drugs, 33 (12.41%) had metabolic disturbances, 21 (7.89%) required total parenteral nutrition and 4 (1.50%) renal replacement therapy. We report four maternal deaths (1.5%; 0.19 per 1000 deliveries). CONCLUSIONS: There are three main reasons of obstetric ICU admissions: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, obstetric hemorrhage and sepsis/infection. The majority of obstetric patients admitted to ICU did not require multi-organ supportive therapy. Availability of intermediate care facility could reduce unnecessary admission to ICU.

Factors associated with non-survival from in-hospital maternal cardiac arrest: An analysis of Get With The Guidelines® (GWTG) data.

INTRODUCTION: Maternal mortality has risen in the United States during the 21st century. Factors influencing outcome of maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to further elucidate the factors affecting maternal death from in-hospital (IH) MCA. METHODS: Our query of the American Heart Association's GWTG®-Resuscitation voluntary registry from 2000-2017 revealed 561 index cases of IH MCA with complete outcome data. Logistic regression was performed using hospital death as the primary outcome and included variables with a p value = 0.1 or less based upon univariate analysis. Age, race, year of arrest, pre-existing conditions, first documented pulseless rhythm and location of arrest were used in the model. Sensitivity analyses and assessment of variable interaction were also performed to test model stability. Institutional review deemed this research exempt from ethical approval. RESULTS: Among 561 cases of MCA, 57.2% (321/561) did not survive to hospital discharge. IH death was not associated with maternal age, race and year of event. In the final model, IH death was significantly associated with pre-arrest hypotension/hypoperfusion (OR = 1.80 (95% CI, 1.16-2.79); p = 0.009). The occurrence of MCA outside of the delivery suite (referent group) or operating room was associated with a significantly higher risk of death: ICU/Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (OR = 3.32 (95% CI, 2.00-5.52); p < 0.001) and ER/other (OR = 1.89 (95% CI, 1.15-3.11); p = 0.012). While MCA cases with a shockable vs. non-shockable first documented pulseless rhythm had similar outcomes, those with an indeterminate rhythm were less likely to die, (OR = 0.41(95% CI, 0.20-0.84); p = 0.014). In a sensitivity analysis, removal of the indeterminate group did not alter outcomes regarding first documented pulseless rhythm or arrest location. Area under the curve for the final model was 0.715 (95% CI 0.673-0.757). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified several novel factors associated with IH death of our MCA cohort. More research is required to further understand the pathophysiologic dynamics affecting outcomes of IH MCA in this unique population.

Is training in obstetric critical care adequate? An international comparison.

Obstetric critical care is an emerging discipline which cuts across speciality boundaries. We have analysed the training curricula in the three major specialities (obstetrics, anaesthesia and intensive care medicine) likely to be involved in the care of the critically-ill obstetric patient, to assess whether it is adequate to ensure effective training on this subject.

Maternal critical care in resource-limited settings. Narrative review.

Maternal critical care reflects interdisciplinary care in any hospital area according to the severity of illness of the pregnant woman. The admission rate to intensive care units is below 1% (0.08-0.76%) of deliveries in high-income countries, and ranges from 0.13% to 4.6% in low- and middle-income countries. Mortality in these patients is high and varies from 0% to 4.9% of admissions in high-income countries, and from 2% to 43.6% in low- and middle-income countries. Obstetric haemorrhage, sepsis, preeclampsia, human immunodeficiency virus complications and tropical diseases are the main reasons for intensive care unit admission in low middle-income countries. Bedside assessment tools, such as early warning scores, may help to identify critically ill patients and those at risk of deterioration. There is a lack of uniformity in definitions, identification and treatment of critically ill pregnant patients, especially in resource-limited settings. Our aims were to (i) propose a more practical definition of maternal critical care, (ii) discuss maternal mortality in the setting of limited accessibility of critical care units, (iii) provide some accessible tools to improve identification of obstetric patients who may become critically ill, and (iv) confront challenges in providing maternal critical care in resource-limited settings. To improve maternal critical care, training programmes should embrace modern technological educational aids and incorporate new tools and technologies that assist prediction of critical illness in the pregnant patient. The goal must be improved outcomes following early interventions, early initiation of resuscitation, and early transfer to an appropriate level of care, whenever possible.

Characteristics and outcomes of maternal cardiac arrest: A descriptive analysis of Get with the guidelines data.

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality has risen in the United States in the twenty-first century, yet large cohort data of maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) are limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe contemporary characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital MCA. METHODS: We queried the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines Resuscitation voluntary registry from 2000 to 2016 to identify cases of maternal cardiac arrest. All index cardiac arrests occurring in women aged 18-50 with a patient illness category designated as obstetric or location of arrest occurring in a delivery suite were included. Institutional review deemed that this research was exempt from ethical approval. RESULTS: A total of 462 index events met criteria for MCA, with a mean age of 31 ± 7 years and a racial distribution of: 49.4% White, 35.3% Black and 15.3% Other/Unknown. While 32% had no pre-existing conditions or physiologic disorders, respiratory insufficiency (36.1%) and hypotension/hypoperfusion (33.3%) were the most common antecedent conditions. In most cases, the first documented pulseless rhythm was non-shockable; pulseless electrical activity (50.8%) or asystole (25.6%). Only 11.7% presented with a shockable rhythm; ventricular fibrillation (6.5%) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (5.2%) while the initial pulseless rhythm was unknown in 11.9% of cases. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 73.6% but 68 (14.7%) had more than one arrest. The rate of survival to discharge was 40.7% overall; 37.3% with non-shockable rhythms, 33% with shockable rhythms and 64.3% with unknown presenting rhythms. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal survival at hospital discharge in this cohort was less than 50%, lower than rates reported in other epidemiological datasets. More research is required in maternal resuscitation science and translational medicine to continue to improve outcomes and understand maternal mortality.