From Belly to Brain: Targeting the Ghrelin Receptor in Appetite and Food Intake Regulation.

Ghrelin is the only known peripherally-derived orexigenic hormone, increasing appetite and subsequent food intake. The ghrelinergic system has therefore received considerable attention as a therapeutic target to reduce appetite in obesity as well as to stimulate food intake in conditions of anorexia, malnutrition and cachexia. As the therapeutic potential of targeting this hormone becomes clearer, it is apparent that its pleiotropic actions span both the central nervous system and peripheral organs. Despite a wealth of research, a therapeutic compound specifically targeting the ghrelin system for appetite modulation remains elusive although some promising effects on metabolic function are emerging. This is due to many factors, ranging from the complexity of the ghrelin receptor (Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor, GHSR-1a) internalisation and heterodimerization, to biased ligand interactions and compensatory neuroendocrine outputs. Not least is the ubiquitous expression of the GHSR-1a, which makes it impossible to modulate centrallymediated appetite regulation without encroaching on the various peripheral functions attributable to ghrelin. It is becoming clear that ghrelin's central signalling is critical for its effects on appetite, body weight regulation and incentive salience of food. Improving the ability of ghrelin ligands to penetrate the blood brain barrier would enhance central delivery to GHSR-1a expressing brain regions, particularly within the mesolimbic reward circuitry.

Divergent associations between ghrelin and neural responsivity to palatable food in hyperphagic and hypophagic depression.

BACKGROUND: The neurobiological mechanisms involved in divergent appetitive phenotypes in major depressive disorder (MDD) are not well understood, although recent data suggest disruption in mesolimbic reward circuitry. Ghrelin, an orexigenic hormone, has been shown to modulate the reward circuitry. We aimed to investigate the relationship between acylated ghrelin levels and the neural response to food stimuli in individuals with hyperphagic and hypophagic MDD in remission. METHODS: Women with hyperphagic MDD (n = 10), hypophagic MDD (n = 18), and healthy controls (HC; n = 18) underwent fMRI scanning during which they viewed images of food. The fMRI session was followed by a standardized meal, appetite ratings, and serial blood draws. RESULTS: In individuals with hyperphagic MDD, greater change in acylated ghrelin in response to a meal was associated with increased BOLD response to high-calorie food in the bilateral ventral tegmental area and left hypothalamus. In contrast, negative associations were observed between acylated ghrelin AUC and BOLD activity in the right hypothalamus in the hypophagic MDD group. LIMITATIONS: Unbalanced group sizes with a relatively small sample in the hyperphagic MDD group. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of differences in absolute ghrelin levels between the hyperphagic MDD and HC groups, results in hyperphagic MDD might suggest a ghrelinergic signaling mechanism for increased appetite during an MDD episode in this group. Our findings shed light on interactions between appetite hormones and mesolimbic circuitry which could contribute to development of therapeutic targets for opposing appetite phenotypes in depression.