The Role of Immunomodulatory Therapy with Oxiris in COVID-19 with Renal Failure and Immune Dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of hemoadsorption on the elimination of inflammatory mediators. METHODS: A prospective, bicenter, observational cohort study was conducted between March 2020 and February 2022 to explore the immunomodulatory response, demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU with severe acute respiratory failure and in need of CRRT with Oxiris® with or without AKI. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were observed between exposed and unexposed groups, in relation to the reduction in D-dimer levels -15,614 (24,848.9) versus -4,136.5 (9,913.47) (p 0.031, d: 1.59, 95% CI: -21,830, -1,126). An increase in PCT was observed 0.47 (2.08) versus -0.75 (2.3) (p 0.044 95% CI: 0.03, 2.44). No differences were found in a decrease in CRP -4.21 (7.29) versus -1.6 (9.02) (p 0.22) nor in the rest of inflammatory parameters fibrinogen, IL-6, ferritin, lymphocytes, and neutrophils. Subgroup analysis in patients exposed to therapy also showed a significant decrease in D-dimer of 55% from baseline: 6,000 (1,984.5-27,750) pre-therapy versus 2,700 (2,119.5-6,145) (95% CI: -23,000, -2,489) post-therapy with a strong effect size (p 0.001, d: 0.65). CONCLUSION: The hemoadsorptive therapy in COVID-19 was associated with a significant decrease in D-dimer parameters without showing decreases in the rest of the clinical, inflammatory parameters and severity scales analyzed.

Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with oXiris® Membrane in a Third-Level Hospital in Northeast Mexico.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic represented a global public health problem with devastating consequences that have challenged conventional medical treatments. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), based on a spectrum of modalities and dialysis membranes, can modify cytokine storms, and improve the clearance of inflammatory factors. As severe COVID-19 can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring RRT, most patients require more than one extracorporeal organ support at this point. This is due to complications that lead to organ dysfunction. The aim of our study was to assess renal recovery and survival while use of the oXiris membrane, as well as a decrease in vasopressors and hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study. The population included adult patients (aged >18 years) with a real-time PCR COVID-19 positive test, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI KDIGO 3, which required CRRT, in a hospital in northern Mexico. The primary outcomes were renal recovery and survival, and the secondary outcomes were a decrease in the vasopressor requirements and changes in the hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included from January 2020 to August 2021, all of whom met the inclusion criteria. oXiris, an AN69-modified membrane, was used for blood purification and cytokine storm control in all the patients. The primary outcome, renal recovery, and survival were observed in 23% of the patients. The secondary outcome was a decrease of 12% in the use of noradrenaline in the first 24 h of CRRT initiation with oXiris, in addition to a decrease in creatinine and C-reactive protein levels in all patients. DISCUSSION: The use of the oXiris membrane in patients with severe COVID-19 improved hemodynamic parameters, with 23% of the patients achieving renal recovery. The decrease on the requirement of vasopressors in the overall patients in the first 24 h of CRRT with oXiris was achieved. The mean decrease was of 12%, accompanied by a decrease in inflammatory markers. There is literature on the benefit of CRRT with a modified AN69 membrane in Mexico; however, studies in this regard are scarce, and our research provides valuable information on our experience in this field.

Continuous renal replacement therapy with the adsorptive oXiris filter may be associated with the lower 28-day mortality in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The oXiris is a novel filter for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) featuring an adsorption coating to adsorb endotoxins and remove inflammatory mediators. Given that no consensus has been reached on its potential benefits in treating sepsis, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess its impact on the clinical outcomes of this patient population. METHODS: Eleven databases were retrieved to find relevant observational studies and randomized controlled trials. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the quality of the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. The 28-day mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were 7-, 14-, and 90-day mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality, norepinephrine (NE) dose, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and lactate levels, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. RESULTS: The meta-analysis, pooling data from 14 studies, involving 695 patients, showed significant reductions in 28-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.77, p = 0.001] and length of ICU stay [weighted mean difference (WMD) - 1.91; 95% CI - 2.56 to - 1.26, p < 0.001)] in patients with sepsis using the oXiris filter compared to other filters. Besides, the SOFA score, NE dose, IL-6 and lactate levels, and 7- and 14-day mortalities were lower in the oXiris group. However, the 90-day mortality, ICU and hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay were comparable. The quality assessment of the ten observational studies indicated intermediate to high quality (average Newcastle-Ottawa score: 7.8). However, all four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had an unclear risk of bias. The evidence for all outcomes had a low or very low level of certainty because the original study design was mainly observational studies and the RCTs included had an unclear risk of bias and a small sample size. CONCLUSION: The treatment with the oXiris filter during CRRT in sepsis patients may be associated with lower 28-, 7-, and 14-day mortalities, lactate levels, SOFA score, NE dose, and shorter length of ICU stay. However, due to the low or very low quality of evidence, the effectiveness of oXiris filters was still uncertain. Besides, no significant difference was observed for the 90-day mortality, ICU and hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Blood Purification with oXiris© in Critically Ill Children with Vasoplegic Shock.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. As such, circulating cytokines and danger- and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (such as endotoxins) are recognized as central in the pathogenesis of sepsis and organ dysfunction. Removing these compounds by extracorporeal blood filtration, commonly considered blood purification, may improve the septic patients' condition. This study aimed to assess the vaso-inotropic support evolution over time in pediatric patients with vasoplegic shock treated with oXiris©. METHODS: All patients aged below 18 years admitted at the Paris Saclay University Quaternary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit with vasoplegic shock and acute kidney injury and treated with oXiris© between October 2017 and January 2020 were included. The vaso-inotropic score and the 28-day mortality were assessed. Improvement under treatment was defined as a 50% decrease in the vaso-inotropic score following 24 h of oXiris© therapy. RESULTS: Eleven pediatric patients aged 2-15 years and weighing 11-60 kg were admitted with vasoplegic shock and acute kidney injury. They received thirteen sessions of oXiris© therapy for septic shock (N = 7) and liver failure (N = 6). Eight patients did not improve their condition during the session, and five ultimately died (37.5% survival). Five patients improved, decreasing their inotropic support by >50% in 24 h. Among them, four survived (80%). CONCLUSION: Hemofiltration and extracorporeal blood purification with oXiris© can be used in pediatric patients with vasoplegic shock with rapid improvement in hemodynamics in selected patients.

Extracorporeal Blood Purification in Moderate and Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by hyperinflammation and coagulopathy. Severe cases often develop respiratory distress, requiring mechanical ventilation and with critical cases progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Control of hyperinflammation has been proposed as a possible therapeutic avenue for COVID-19; extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) modalities offer an attractive mean to ameliorate maladaptive inflammation. With this work, we evaluated the longitudinal changes of systemic inflammatory markers in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with blood purification using AN69ST (oXiris®) haemofilter. METHODS: We performed a time-series analysis of 44 consecutive COVID-19 cases treated with the AN69ST (oXiris®) cytokine adsorbing haemofilter (CAH) according to local practice; we visualize longitudinal results of biochemical, inflammatory, blood gas, and vital sign parameters focussing on systemic levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin. RESULTS: All patients were treated with ≥1 cycle extracorporeal continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) with CAH; of these, 30 severe patients received CVVH-CAH within 4-12 h of admission after recognizing a hyper-inflammatory state. Another 14 patients admitted with mild-to-moderate symptoms progressed to severe disease and were placed on EBP during hospitalization. The treatment was associated with a reduction of ferritin, CRP, fibrinogen, several inflammatory markers, and a resolution of numerous cytopenias. The observed mortality across the cohort was 36.3%. CONCLUSION: EBP with CAH was associated with a decrease in CRP, and control of IL-6 and procalcitonin.

Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of AN69-oXiris versus AN69-ST Filter in Septic Patients: A Single-Centre Study.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of AN69-oXiris remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of AN69-oXiris and AN69-ST filters on cytokine levels and clinical improvement in septic patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study recruited septic patients who underwent blood purification in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between December 2019 and May 2020. Patients were assigned to an AN69-oXiris (oXiris) or AN69-ST (ST) group based on their preferred filter. Patients' clinical data, cytokine levels, and prognostic indicators were analysed at baseline (T0), 24 h after treatment (T1), and at the end of the treatment (T2). RESULTS: Forty-four patients participated in this study (22 patients in each group). Participants in both groups showed improvements in mean arterial pressure (MAP) values, oxygenation indices, and urinary output, and decreased vasoactive-inotropic scores (VISs), heart rates, lactic acid levels, and serum creatinine levels after blood purification. Reductions in cytokine levels were observed at T1 in both groups. Improvement the haemodynamic status was higher in the oXiris group than in the ST group at T2 (MAP: 79.0 [76.0, 85.0] vs. 77.0 [72.75, 79.25] mm Hg, p = 0.04; VISs: 9.10 [0.00, 16.69] vs. 19.05 [10.60, 26.33], p = 0.03, respectively). Patients in the oXiris group also had lower cytokine levels than those in the ST group at T1 (tumour necrosis factor-α: 24.55 [16.9, 30.15] vs. 30.15 [23.38, 34.13] pg/mL, p = 0.04; interleukin (IL)-6: 66.63 [46.21, 102.20] vs. 125.48 [79.73, 167.97] pg/mL, p = 0.01; IL-8: 53.59 [35.10, 66.01] vs. 63.60 [45.58, 83.37] pg/mL, p = 0.04; IL-10: 13.50 [10.35, 18.68] vs. 17.15 [13.80, 21.95] pg/mL, p = 0.04, respectively). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. CONCLUSION: Blood purification using the AN69-oXiris or AN69-ST filter proved useful for septic patients, which was associated with reduced cytokine levels and improved clinical condition. Patients treated with AN69-oXiris had a more remarkable improvement in haemodynamic status and lower cytokine levels than those treated with AN69-ST filter, but there were no differences in clinical outcomes. Further investigations are needed to prove this finding.

Hemoperfusion and blood purification strategies in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) ranges from asymptomatic infection to severe cases requiring admission to the intensive care unit. Together with supportive therapies (ventilation in particular), the suppression of the pro-inflammatory state has been a hypothesized target. Pharmacological therapies with corticosteroids and interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antagonists have reduced mortality. The use of extracorporeal cytokine removal, also known as hemoperfusion (HP), could be a promising non-pharmacological approach to decrease the pro-inflammatory state in COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases in order to summarize the evidence regarding HP therapy in COVID-19. We included original studies and case series enrolling at least five patients. RESULTS: We included 11 articles and describe the characteristics of the populations studied from both clinical and biological perspectives. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. Only two studies had a control group, one of which included 101 patients in total. The remaining studies had a range between 10 and 50 patients included. There was large variability in the HP techniques implemented and in clinical and biological outcomes reported. Most studies described decreasing levels of IL-6 after HP treatment. CONCLUSION: Our review does not support strong conclusions regarding the role of HP in COVID-19. Considering the very low level of clinical evidence detected, starting HP therapies in COVID-19 patients does not seem supported outside of clinical trials. Prospective randomized data are needed.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with oXiris® Membrane in Severe Ebstein-Barr Virus-Mediated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Case Report.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a life-threatening disease with uncontrolled immune activation and inflammatory reaction, often leads to a deadly cytokine storm. In severe Ebstein-Barr virus-triggered HLH receiving standard immunosuppression, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with oXiris® blood purification membrane resulted in a timely reduction of inflammatory markers and discontinuation of vasopressors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful use of the oXiris® membrane in HLH.

The absorbing filter Oxiris in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A case series.

Hypercytokines cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, which is the main reason for intensive care unit treatment and the leading cause of death in COVID-19 patients. Cytokine storm is a critical factor in the development of ARDS. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Oxiris filter in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Five patients with COVID-19 who received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in Henan provincial people's hospital between January 23, 2019 and March 28, 2020, were enrolled in this study. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygenation index (PaO2 /FiO2 ), renal function, C-reactive protein (CRP), cytokines, procalcitonin (PCT), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure score (SOFA), and prognosis were compared after CRRT. Five COVID-19 patients, three males and two females, aged 70.2 ± 19.6 years, were enrolled. After treatment, HR (101.4 ± 14.08 vs. 83.8 ± 6.22 bpm/min), CRP (183 ± 25.21 vs. 93.78 ± 70.81 mg/L), IL-6 (3234.49 (713.51, 16038.36) vs. 181.29 (82.24, 521.39) pg/mL), IL-8 (154.86 (63.97, 1476.1) vs. 67.19 (27.84, 85.57) pg/mL), and IL-10 (17.43 (9.14, 41.22) vs. 4.97 (2.39, 8.70) pg/mL), APACHE II (29 ± 4.92 vs. 18.4 ± 2.07), and SOFA (17.2 ± 1.92 vs. 11.2 ± 3.4) significantly decreased (P < .05), while MAP (75.8 ± 4.92 vs. 85.8 ± 6.18 mm Hg), and PaO2 /FiO2 (101.2 ± 7.49 vs. 132.6 ± 26.15 mm Hg) significantly increased (P < .05). Among the five patients, negative conversion of nucleic acid test was found in three cases, while two cases died. No adverse events occurred during the treatment. Our study observed a reduced level of overexpressed cytokines, stabilization of hemodynamic status, and staged improvement of organ function during the treatment with Oxiris filter.

Is there a role for blood purification therapies targeting cytokine storm syndrome in critically severe COVID-19 patients?

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has spread over many countries and regions since the end of 2019, becoming the most severe public health event at present. Most of the critical cases developed multiple organ dysfunction, including acute kidney injury (AKI). Cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) may complicate the process of severe COVID-19 patients. This manuscript reviews the different aspects of blood purification in critically ill patients with AKI and increased inflammatory factors, and examines its potential role in severe COVID-19 treatment. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been practiced in many sepsis patients with AKI. Still, the timing and dosing need further robust evidence. In addition to the traditional CRRT, the high-throughput membrane with adsorption function and cytokine adsorption column are two representatives of recently emerging novel membrane technologies. Their potential in removing inflammatory factors and other toxins prospects for the treatment of severe COVID-19.

oXiris® Use in Septic Shock: Experience of Two French Centres.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to an infection and can result in organ dysfunctions and death. Extracorporeal blood purification techniques aim to improve the prognosis of these patients by modulating the unbalanced immune response. This study reports our experience with the use of the oXiris® membrane for septic shock patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). SUMMARY: Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with septic shock and underwent CRRT with the oXiris® membrane between 2014 and 2019. We compared the observed hospital mortality with that predicted by the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II). Change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and of the main clinical and biological parameters over time were analyzed. Hospital mortality was lower than predicted for the most severe patients (60 vs. 91% for the [74-87] SAPS II quartile and 70 vs. 98% for the [87-163] SAPS II quartile, p < 0.02). There was no significant improvement in the SOFA score from 0h to 48 h. An 88% relative decrease in norepinephrine infusion was observed (median at 0 h was 1.69 [0.52-2.45] µg/kg/min; at 48 h it was 0.20 [0.09-1.14] µg/kg/min, p = 0.002). Lactataemia and pH were significantly improved over time. Patients with intra-abdominal sepsis as well as those with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infections seemed to benefit the most from the therapy. Key Messages: CRRT with the oXiris® haemofilter resulted in higher observed survival than predicted by a severity score (SAPS II) for the most severe patients. Haemodynamic status and lactataemia appeared to improve, especially in intra-abdominal sepsis and GNB infections.

Outcomes of extracorporeal blood purification with oXiris® membrane in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the novel oXiris® membrane in critically ill adult patients. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to 01/06/2023 for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of intervention (NRSI). The primary outcome was overall mortality. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan 5.4.1. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. (PROSPERO: CRD42023389198). RESULTS: Ten studies (2 RCTs and 8 NRSIs) with 481 patients were included. None had low risk of bias. Treatment using oXiris® was associated with reduced overall mortality (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62-0.98; p = 0.03; 6 NRSI). One RCT reported 28-day mortality, finding no significant difference between groups. Besides, pooled NRSIs results showed significant reductions in SOFA scores, norepinephrine dosage, and several inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], lactate, and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) post oXiris® treatment. However, other clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration) were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, the use of oXiris® membrane was associated with reduced overall mortality, norepinephrine dosage, CRP, IL-6, lactate levels, along with improved organ function. However, the certainty of evidence was very low, necessitating high-quality RCTs to further evaluate its efficacy in this population.

Clinical efficacy of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption in septic shock patients: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption on patients with septic shock and their prognosis. DESIGN: A retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Septic shock patients. INTERVENTIONS: The oXiris group underwent hemofiltration adsorption using oXiris hemofilters and septic shock standard treatment, while the control group received septic shock standard treatment. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: The changes in inflammatory indicators and short-term mortality rate were evaluated. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted based on the 1:2 ratio between the oXiris and control groups to account for any baseline data differences. RESULTS: Results showed that after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatment, PCT, IL-6, and hs-CRP levels in the oXiris group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in norepinephrine equivalents and organ function status (APACHE II score, SOFA score, Lac) between the two groups at the same time points. The 72-h mortality rate (21.88% vs. 34.04%) and the 7-day mortality rate (28.12% vs. 44.68%) were lower in the oXiris group compared to the control group, but not statistically significant. The 28-day mortality rate did not show a significant difference between the two groups (53.19% vs. 56.25%). CONCLUSIONS: oXiris continuous hemofiltration adsorption technology may reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in patients with septic shock; however, it does not appear to enhance organ function or improve the 28-day mortality rate in these patients.

The clinical efficacy and suitable implementation of two extracorporeal blood purification therapies: AN69-oXiris versus PMX-HP.

Purpose: In septic shock patients, pathogens and excessive endotoxins continuously overstimulate the host's immune system with a cytokine storm that can lead to multi-organ failure and even mortality. Various types of extracorporeal blood purification treatments have recently been introduced to remove excessive endotoxins and cytokines. Herein, we compared the clinical efficacy of two blood purification methods, PMX-HP and AN69-oXiris, and discussed their detailed indications according to disease severity. Materials and methods: From December 2016 to April 2023, patients who underwent emergent surgery due to septic shock secondary to peritonitis and subsequently received blood purification treatment with AN69-oXiris or PMX-HP were enrolled. Propensity score (PS)-matching was conducted to adjust for baseline characteristics between the two groups, and the changes in clinical parameters and outcomes were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed in subgroups of patients who underwent PMX-HP treatment divided according to SOFA scores into low (0-7), intermediate (8-13), and high (> 13) disease severity groups. Results: Forty patients received blood purification therapy with either PMX-HP or AN69-oXiris during the study period. After 1:2 PS matching, six patients in the AN69-oXiris group and 12 patients in the PMX-HP group were finally analyzed. Vasoactive-inotropic scores (VISs) decreased in both groups after 48 h of treatment compared to the baseline values, but the change in VISs was more pronounced in the PMX-HP group {-57.6 [interquartile range (IQR) = -166.4 - (-10)] vs. -22.9 [IQR = -64-0], respectively, p = 0.041}. Decreases in cardiovascular SOFA scores were significantly pronounced in the PMX-HP group [-1.5 (IQR = -4 - 0) vs. 0 (IQR = -1 - 1), respectively, p = 0.035]. The 7-day mortality rate was significantly lower than the predicted mortality rate in a subgroup analysis of patients treated with PMX-HP in both the low disease severity group and the intermediate disease severity group. Conclusion: PMX-HP and AN69-oXiris could be therapeutic options for refractory septic shock patients with intra-abdominal origins, especially after the surgical elimination of the infectious sources. A tailored modality choice that takes into account patient characteristics, such as disease severity and cost burden, could optimize the efficacy of this strategy.

Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.

Sepsis and septic shock are associated with high mortality, with diagnosis and treatment remaining a challenge for clinicians. Their management classically encompasses hemodynamic resuscitation, antibiotic treatment, life support, and focus control; however, there are aspects that have changed. This narrative review highlights current and avant-garde methods of handling patients experiencing septic shock based on the experience of its authors and the best available evidence in a context of uncertainty. Following the first recommendation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, it is recommended that specific sepsis care performance improvement programs are implemented in hospitals, i.e., "Sepsis Code" programs, designed ad hoc, to achieve this goal. Regarding hemodynamics, the importance of perfusion and hemodynamic coherence stand out, which allow for the recognition of different phenotypes, determination of the ideal time for commencing vasopressor treatment, and the appropriate fluid therapy dosage. At present, this is not only important for the initial timing, but also for de-resuscitation, which involves the early weaning of support therapies, directed elimination of fluids, and fluid tolerance concept. Finally, regarding blood purification therapies, those aimed at eliminating endotoxins and cytokines are attractive in the early management of patients in septic shock.

Capnocytophaga canimorsus Meningitis Complicated by Septic Shock: The Use of Extracorporeal Blood Purification Techniques.

Capnocytophaga canimorsus is a Gram-negative bacterium, commonly found as a commensal germ in the oral cavity of dogs and cats. It is an opportunistic pathogen, but, in specific situations, it can cause very severe diseases, including arthritis, pleuritis, endocarditis, sepsis, and, in extremely rare cases, meningoencephalitis. The predisposing situations include immunosuppression, liver cirrhosis, splenectomy, hemochromatosis, beta thalassemia major (Cooley's anemia), and alcohol abuse. In this report, we describe the case of a 48-year-old male patient, with a medical history of several predisposing conditions, who developed a severe case of meningoencephalitis caused by C. canimorsus, following a dog bite on his hand. The patient was successfully treated for his meningitis, but subsequently he developed a hospital-acquired septic shock from Acinetobacter baumannii, which was treated with targeted antibiotic therapy and sequential extracorporeal blood purification therapies using Oxiris™ and Toraymyxin™ hemofilters.

Effects of enhanced adsorption haemofiltration versus haemoadsorption in severe, refractory septic shock with high levels of endotoxemia: the ENDoX bicentric, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endotoxin adsorption is a promising but controversial therapy in severe, refractory septic shock and conflicting results exist on the effective capacity of available devices to reduce circulating endotoxin and inflammatory cytokine levels. METHODS: Multiarm, randomized, controlled trial in two Swiss intensive care units, with a 1:1:1 randomization of patients suffering severe, refractory septic shock with high levels of endotoxemia, defined as an endotoxin activity ≥ 0.6, a vasopressor dependency index ≥ 3, volume resuscitation of at least 30 ml/kg/24 h and at least single organ failure, to a haemoadsorption (Toraymyxin), an enhanced adsorption haemofiltration (oXiris) or a control intervention. Primary endpoint was the difference in endotoxin activity at 72-h post-intervention to baseline. In addition, inflammatory cytokine, vasopressor dependency index and SOFA-Score dynamics over the initial 72 h were assessed inter alia. RESULTS: In the 30, out of 437 screened, randomized patients (10 Standard of care, 10 oXiris, 10 Toraymyxin), endotoxin reduction at 72-h post-intervention-start did not differ among interventions (Standard of Care: 12 [1-42]%, oXiris: 21 [10-51]%, Toraymyxin: 23 [10-36]%, p = 0.82). Furthermore, no difference between groups could be observed neither for reduction of inflammatory cytokine levels (p = 0.58), nor for vasopressor weaning (p = 0.95) or reversal of organ injury (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In a highly endotoxemic, severe, refractory septic shock population neither the Toraymyxin adsorber nor the oXiris membrane could show a reduction in circulating endotoxin or cytokine levels over standard of care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01948778. Registered August 30, 2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01948778.

Continuous renal replacement therapy with oXiris® in patients with hematologically malignant septic shock: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate from septic shock in patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) remains significantly higher than that in patients without HMs. A longer resuscitation time would definitely be harmful because of the irreversibly immunocompromised status of the patients. Shortening the resuscitation time through continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with oXiris® would be an attractive strategy in managing such patients. AIM: To explore the effects of CRRT and oXiris® in shortening the resuscitation time and modifying the host response by reducing inflammation mediator levels. METHODS: Forty-five patients with HM were diagnosed with septic shock and underwent CRRT between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the hemofilter used for CRRT (oXiris® group, n = 26; M150 group, n = 19). We compared the number of days of negative and total fluid balance after 7 d of CRRT between the groups. The heart rate, norepinephrine dose, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and blood lactic acid levels at different time points in the two groups were also compared. Blood levels of inflammatory mediators in the 26 patients in the oXiris® group were measured to further infer the possible mechanism. RESULTS: The average total fluid balance after 7 d of CRRT in the oXiris® group was significantly lower than that of patients in the M150 hemofilter group. The SOFA scores of patients after CRRT with oXiris® therapy were significantly lower than those before treatment on day 1 (d1), d3 and d7 after CRRT; these parameters were also significantly lower than those of the control group on d7. The lac level after oXiris® therapy was significantly lower than that before treatment on d3 and d7 after CRRT. There were no significant differences in the above parameters between the two groups at the other time points. In the oXiris® group, procalcitonin levels decreased on d7, whereas interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor levels decreased significantly on d3 and d7 after treatment. CONCLUSION: CRRT with oXiris® hemofilter may improve hemodynamics by reducing inflammatory mediators and playing a role in shortening the resuscitation period and decreasing total fluid balance in the resuscitation phases.

The effect of the AN69 ST100 versus oXiris® membrane on filter life during CRRT for non-anticoagulated liver failure patients.

BACKGROUNDS: In patients with liver failure, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) without anticoagulation may be necessary. A new heparin coated membrane (oXiris®) may prolong circuit life in this setting. OBJECTIVES: In liver failure patients not receiving anticoagulation, to compare CRRT circuit life with the oXiris® versus the AN69 ST100 (usual care) membrane. METHODS: Randomized single cross-over trial. RESULTS: We studied 20 patients and 39 circuits. Twenty-five treatments used femoral and 14 internal jugular access catheters. Median circuit life was 21 h (IQR: 8.25-35.5) with the AN69 versus 16.0 h (14-25) with the oXiris® membrane (p = 0.36). Median first circuit duration was 14 (11.25-23) h for the AN69 ST100 versus 16 (8 -26) for the oXiris® membrane. There was also no difference between the AN69 ST100 or oXiris® membrane circuits using femoral access at 13 (8 -22.5) versus 15.5 (12.5-21.5) h (p = 0.57) or internal jugular access at 28 (13-47) versus 23 (21-29) h (p = 0.79), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The oXiris® heparin-grafted membrane does not appear to prolong circuit life in liver failure patients receiving CRRT without anticoagulation.

Blood filters in children with COVID-19 and acute kidney injury: A review.

COVID-19 has challenged the global healthcare system through rapid proliferation and lack of existing treatment resulting in over 180 million cases and 3.8 million deaths since December 2019. Although pediatric patients only comprise 1%-2% of diagnosed cases, their incidence of acute kidney injury ranges from 8.2% to 18.2% compared to 49% in adults. Severe infection, initiated by dysregulated host response, can lead to multiorgan failure. In this review, we focus on the use of various blood filters approved for use in pediatric kidney replacement therapy to mitigate adverse effects of severe illness. Therapeutic effects of these blood filters range from cytokine removal (CytoSorb, HA330, HCO/MCO), endotoxin removal (Toraymyxin, CPFA), both cytokine and endotoxin removal (oXiris), and nonspecific removal of proteins (PMMA) that have already been established and can be used to mitigate the various effects of the cytokine storm syndrome in COVID-19.