Oral anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: benefits and risks.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few recent large-scale studies have evaluated the risks and benefits of continuing oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the status of continuation of OAC therapy and the association between continuation of OAC therapy and thromboembolic and bleeding events according to the CHADS2 score. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from the Japanese nationwide administrative claims database of patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2014 and March 2021. Patients without AF recurrence assessed by administrative data of the treatment modalities were divided into two groups according to continuation of OAC therapy 6 months after the index CA. The primary outcomes were thromboembolism and major bleeding after a landmark period of 6 months. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, the association between OAC continuation and outcomes was determined according to the CHADS2 score. RESULTS: Among 231 374 patients included, 69.7%, 21.6%, and 8.7% had CHADS2 scores of ≤1, 2, and ≥3, respectively. Of these, 71% continued OAC therapy at 6 months. The OAC continuation rate was higher in the high CHADS2 score group than that in the low CHADS2 score group. Among all patients, 2451 patients (0.55 per 100 person-years) had thromboembolism and 2367 (0.53 per 100 person-years) had major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≤1 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.01, P = .06] for thromboembolism and was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.27-1.80, P < .001) for major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≥3 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82, P = .001) for thromboembolism and was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.71-1.56, P = 0.81) for major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests that the benefits and risks of continuing OAC therapy after CA for AF differ based on the patient's CHADS2 score. The risk of major bleeding due to OAC continuation seems to outweigh the risk reduction of thromboembolism in patients with lower thromboembolic risk.

Atrial fibrillation accelerates functional decline in older adults: a 15-year follow-up population-based study.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with functional impairment. However, the role exerted by AF on the long-term trajectories of functional mobility remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of AF on functional mobility by tracing walking speed (WS) trajectories over 15 years of follow-up in a population-based cohort of individuals aged 60+ years. METHODS AND RESULTS: This population-based cohort study included 3141 community-dwelling participants (mean age 73.7 years; 63.6% women) from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, who were regularly examined from 2001-2004 to 2016-2019. Functional mobility was assessed by measuring WS in a standardized way. The association between AF and WS trajectories was assessed by multivariable joint models accounting for the longitudinal dropouts due to death. Stratified analyses by demographic and clinical factors were performed. The effect-modifying role of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC), incident heart failure (HF), and incident stroke was finally investigated. At baseline, 285 (9.1%) participants were ascertained to have AF. A faster annual WS decline was observed in persons with AF than in non-AF peers (adjusted ß coefficient per year = -0.011, 95% confidence interval: -0.016 to -0.005). Incident HF and stroke were associated with greater WS decline in participants with AF. OAC use was not associated with a slower functional decline. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation is associated with a faster physical function decline in older individuals. Incident HF and stroke possibly accelerate WS decline over time in AF participants.

Short-term antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy after left atrial appendage closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their inception to March 2023. Patients were divided into short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) group and antiplatelet therapy (APT) group. The incidence of events were performed using RevMan 5.4. The events including device-related thrombus (DRT), ischemic stroke/systemic embolization (SE), major bleeding, any bleeding, any major adverse event and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis were based on OAC alone or OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in OAC group. Oral anticoagulants include warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Fourteen studies with 35,166 patients were included. We found that the incidence of DRT (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, P＜0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in OAC group than APT group. However, there was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of ischemic stroke/SE (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.49-1.20, P = 0.25), major bleeding (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.27, P = 0.84), any bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.22, P = 0.34) and any major adverse event (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-1.03, P = 0.06) in the two groups. Subgroup analysis found that the incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality and any major adverse event in OAC monotherapy were lower than that in APT group (P＜0.05), but not statistically different from other outcome. The incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality, any major adverse event and any bleeding in DOAC were significantly better than APT group (P＜0.05). While warfarin only has better incidence of DRT than APT (P＜0.05), there was no statistical difference between the two groups in other outcome (P＞0.05). The incidence of DRT was significantly lower than APT group (P＜0.05), major bleeding were higher, and the rest of the outcome did not show any statistically significant differences(P＞0.05) when OAC plus SAPT. Based on the existing data, short-term OAC may be favored over APT for patients who undergo LAAC. DOAC monotherapy may be favored over warfarin monotherapy or OAC plus APT, when selecting anticoagulant therapies.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults and is responsible for 600,000 emergency department (ED) visits each year in the USA. Over 60% of these patients are admitted to inpatient units. The prevalence of AF is increasing, resulting in higher numbers of AF-related ED visits and inpatient admissions. These trends underscore the need for improvements in the efficiency of AF management in the ED. RECENT FINDINGS: Several treatment protocols have been developed to address challenges associated with AF management in the ED, including: initiation of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, cardioversion, and arranging for outpatient follow-up. Studies of these protocols have demonstrated that they can be utilized safely and effectively. Published treatment protocols for AF in the ED have been shown to reduce unnecessary hospital admissions and improve adherence to guideline-directed OAC therapy. Widespread adoption of AF treatment protocols could improve patient outcomes and reduce the costs associated with inpatient AF treatment.

Epicardial standalone left atrial appendage clipping for prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation contraindicated for oral anticaogulation.

INTRODUCTION: The most appropriate treatment for stroke prevention in standalone atrial fibrillation patients with a high CHADS2VASC score contraindicated for oral anticoagulation (OAC) or novel OAC (NOAC) still needs to be defined. Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices are available, but because of their endocardial positioning need a period of antiplatelet therapy (APT). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epicardial left atrial appendage clipping in patients contraindicated for (N)OAC and APT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe a standalone totally thoracoscopic LAA clipping of forty-five consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF; 32 males; age, 73.1 ± 7.4 years; CHADVASC, 6.5 ± 1.1; HAS-BLED 4.9 ± 0.9) with absolute contraindications to (N)OAC. The patients were selected by a multidisciplinary Heart Team. Sixty percent had a previous ischemic stroke and 51% a history of the hemorrhagic event and 22% both. All patients were implanted with an LAA epicardial clip, guided by preoperative computed tomography and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. The mean procedural duration was 52.3 ± 12.6 minutes with postprocedural extubation interval of 22.8 ± 14.6 minutes. No procedure-related complications occurred. Intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed complete LAA occlusion in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 16.4 ± 9.1 months (range, 2-34), with all patients off (N)OAC or APT, no ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic complications occurred. computed tomography or TEE at follow-up demonstrated a correct LAA occlusion in all with mean stumps of 3.3 ± 2.8 mm. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic epicardial closure of the LAA with the AtriClip PRO2 device is a potentially safe and efficient treatment for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF contraindicated for anticoagulant therapy or APT.

Secondary stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study.

AIMS: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy as secondary stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unexplored and poses a clinical treatment dilemma. We assessed the long-term risk of thromboembolic events according to post-stroke OAC therapy in AF patients with CKD after their first ischaemic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified Danish AF patients with CKD who presented with first-time ischaemic stroke from 2005 to 2014. Chronic kidney disease was defined as a diagnosis code for CKD before baseline, defined as 100 days after stroke discharge. Post-stroke antithrombotic therapy (OAC therapy and antiplatelet therapy) was identified from prescription claims from discharge to baseline. Cumulative incidences and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of thromboembolic events according to post-stroke OAC therapy were examined. Of 1252 AF patients with CKD presenting with ischaemic stroke, 631 (50.4%) patients were on OAC therapy and 621 (49.6%) were on antiplatelet therapy alone at baseline [median age 76 (interquartile range, IQR 71-83) and 80 (IQR 72-86), respectively]. The median follow-up period was 1.9 years (IQR 0.8-3.6). Cumulative incidence rates of thromboembolic events and bleeding showed no significant difference between those on OAC therapy and antiplatelet therapy. The results from the multivariable analysis revealed similar results: thromboembolic risk was not modified by OAC treatment [adjusted HR 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.09] nor was the risk of bleeding (adjusted HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67-1.17). CONCLUSION: Oral anticoagulation in patients with CKD and prior stroke was not associated with a reduced risk of recurrent thromboembolic events compared with antiplatelet therapy.

Rivaroxaban in patients undergoing surgical mitral valve repair.

In patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVre), a 3-month course of anticoagulation is currently recommended. The role of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants has here been scarcely studied. In the present mixed cohort study, the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban (prospective analysis) were compared with those of warfarin (retrospective analysis) in patients undergoing MVre. Anticoagulation therapy was continued for at least 3 months, and the patients were followed for 1 year following surgery. The present study recruited 736 patients undergoing MVre with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass or surgical repair on the other valves. Concomitant valvular replacement and severe chronic kidney diseases were the most important exclusion criteria. The final analysis was conducted on 153 patients treated with rivaroxaban and 144 patients treated with warfarin. Dissimilarities in baseline characteristics necessitated propensity score matching, in which 104 patients in each group were compared. No major bleeding or cerebrovascular accident occurred during the 1-year follow-up. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was reported in 2 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 4 patients in the warfarin group, a difference non-statistically significant before and after propensity score matching (P = 0.371 and P = 0.407, respectively). The type of anticoagulation did not predict the 1-year outcome (HR 2.165, 95% CI 0.376 to 12.460; P = 0.387). In this mixed cohort study, rivaroxaban was both safe and efficient in patients with MVre. Such preliminary results should prompt larger randomized controlled trials.

Discontinuation of anticoagulants after successful surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The decision of whether to continue oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) after successful surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is challenging, and current guidelines provide no specific recommendations on whether or not it is safe to terminate OAT. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes in patients who either did or did not, receive OAT after surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. METHODS: In a prospective follow-up study, patients were included if surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation concomitantly with other cardiac surgery was done, between 2004 and 2018 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. After 12 months, OAT was discontinued if: (a) sinus rhythm was documented by electrocardiogram, (b) atrial fibrillation was absent on 5-day Holter monitoring, (c) CHADS2 score ≤2, and (d) no other indications for OAT were present. Follow-up was ended in April 2019. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients underwent surgical ablation of which 436 patients reached the baseline at 12 months; 286 patients received OAT, and 150 had OAT discontinued. Survival analysis revealed no differences between the two groups (P = .723). Mean survival time in the group receiving OAT was 5.3 ± 3.3 years, compared to 5.1 ± 3.0 years in the group where OAT was discontinued (P = .784). There was no difference in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the two groups (P = .846). CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of OAT is safe in patients with a CHADS2 score ≤2 following successful surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion. This conclusion needs to be confirmed in randomized trials.

Stroke prophylaxis in critically-ill patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation.

Despite a high incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in critically ill patients and its association with short and long-term incidence of stroke, there is limited data assessing anticoagulation on hospital discharge in these patients. We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of all adult patients admitted to non-cardiac ICUs at our institution between January 2009 and March 2016. Patients with NOAF were identified and CHA2DS2-VASc score of ICU survivors was calculated. Prescription of oral anticoagulant therapy on hospital discharge was analyzed. A total of 640 (1.7% [38,708 patients]; 95% CI 1.5%, 1.8%) patients developed NOAF during the study period. CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated for 615 patients, of which 82.2% had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. Of the 428 eligible patients, only 96 patients (22.4%) were discharged on oral anticoagulant therapy. Patients with a history of congestive heart failure (33.7% vs. 19.7%) and stroke/TIA or other thromboembolic disease (35.9% vs. 18.0%) were more likely to be discharged on an oral anticoagulant. Patients with a higher score were also more likely to be discharged on an oral anticoagulant (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.10, 1.47). NOAF is common in critically ill patients admitted to non-cardiac ICUs and a significant proportion of these patients have a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. However, only a minority of them are discharged on an oral anticoagulant. There is a need to identify ways to improve implementation of effective stroke prophylaxis in these patients.

Diagnosis and Management of Left Atrium Appendage Thrombosis in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Cardioversion.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk of stroke and thromboembolic complications. A rhythm control strategy with both electrical and pharmacological cardioversion is recommended for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulant therapy for 3-4 weeks prior to cardioversion is recommended in order to avoid thromboembolic events deriving from restoring sinus rhythm. Transesophageal echocardiography has a pivotal role in this setting, excluding the presence of left atrial appendage thrombus before cardioversion. The aim of this review is to discuss the epidemiology and risk factors for left atrial appendage thrombosis, the role of echocardiography in the decision making before cardioversion, and the efficacy of different anticoagulant regimens on the detection and treatment of left atrial appendage thrombosis.

Randomized clinical study of the peri-implant healing to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in patients receiving anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the peri-implant bone healing between TiZr implants with hydrophilic SLActive and hydrophobic SLA implant surface in patients receiving anticoagulants, to assess the implant survival and success rate, as well as to evaluate whether small-diameter TiZr implants could be used in patients on OAT in order to avoid augmentation procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 80 small-diameter tissue-level TiZr implants with SLActive and SLA surfaces were placed in 20 anticoagulated patients, following the "split-mouth" study design. Implant stability was measured up to the third postoperative month by resonance frequency measurements (RFA). One-year implant survival and success rate were evaluated. RESULTS: After one year, 100% implant survival and success rate were observed. A significant decrease in ISQ comparing to baseline values was noted in the SLActive group from the first postoperative week, and in the SLA group, from the 3rd week after the surgery. In both groups, a statistically significant decline in ISQ was observed between second and third postoperative week. No significant differences in ISQ values between SLActive and SLA implants were noted, at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Titanium-zirconium small-diameter implants with SLActive and SLA surface predictably achieve and maintain adequate bone tissue integration in patients receiving anticoagulants. OAT appears to influence the bone healing events resulting in lower ISQ in the end of 3-month period in comparison with baseline values, although without compromising implant stability.

Patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes about oral anticoagulation and atrial fibrillation: a qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant therapy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but many patients are still not prescribed this therapy. The causes of underuse of vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants are not clear but could be related, in part, to patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes towards the benefits and downsides of this treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and synthesize patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes towards the benefits and downsides of vitamin K antagonist, in order to explore potential factors related with its underuse. METHODS: We included studies that used qualitative or mixed methods and focused on patients' and/or physicians' perceptions and attitudes towards oral anticoagulation. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, ISI WoK, and PsycINFO from their inception until May 2013. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and synthesized results using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: We included a total of nine studies. In four studies, the quality assessed was excellent and in five was moderate. We identified three themes that were of interest to both physicians and patients: information to reinforce anticoagulation use, balance of benefits and downsides, roles in decision-making and therapy management. Three additional themes were of interest to patients: knowledge and understanding, impact on daily life, and satisfaction with therapy. The main difficulties with the use of anticoagulant treatment according to physicians were the perceived uncertainty, need of individualised decision-making, and the feeling of delegated responsibility as their main concerns. The main factors for patients were the lack of information and understanding. CONCLUSION: Physicians' and patients' perceptions and attitudes might be potential factors in the underuse of treatment with vitamin K antagonists. Improving the quality and usability of clinical guidelines, developing tools to help with the decision-making, enhancing coordination between primary care and hospital care, and improving information provided to patients could help improve the underuse of anticoagulation.

Technology-assisted self-testing and management of oral anticoagulation therapy: a qualitative patient-focused study.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy requires regular blood testing to ensure therapeutic levels are maintained and excessive bleeding/clotting is avoided. Technology-assisted self-testing and management is seen as one of the key areas in which quality of care can be improved whilst reducing costs. Nevertheless, levels of patient engagement in self-testing and management remain low. To date, little research emphasis has been placed on understanding the patients' perspectives for low engagement. The typical approach adopted by healthcare providers is to provide patient education programmes, with the expectation that individual patients will change their behaviour and adopt new self-care strategies. However, if levels of patient engagement are to be increased, healthcare providers must also develop a better understanding of how their clinical service provision is perceived by patients and make adaptations. OBJECTIVE: To explore patient views, needs and expectations of an anticoagulation service and the self-testing and management services provided. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 17 patients who currently engage in international normalised ratio (INR) self-testing and management. Thematic coding and analysis were carried out on the interview transcripts. RESULTS: Four high-level themes emerged from interviews: (i) role of clinic, (ii) motivations for self-testing, (iii) managing INR and (iv) trust. The clinic was seen as adding value in terms of specifying testing frequency, dosage profiles and calibrating equipment. Prompt communication from clinic to patient was also valued, although more personalised/real-time communication would help avoid feelings of isolation. Patients felt more in control as self-tester/managers and often took decisions about treatment adjustments themselves. However, some also manipulated their own test results to avoid 'unnecessary' interventions. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: More personalised/real-time communication, pragmatic and collaborative patient-clinician partnerships and recognition of expert patient knowledge and expertise are needed if increased levels of engagement with self-testing and management service provision is to be realised.

Warfarin use, mortality, bleeding and stroke in haemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) is the choice treatment for thromboembolism prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), although data about OAT use in haemodialysis (HD) patients with AF are contradictory. METHODS: The effect of OAT on the risk of mortality, stroke and bleeding was prospectively evaluated in a population of HD patients with AF. All the patients of 10 HD Italian centres alive on 31 October 2010 with documented AF episode(s) were recruited and followed-up for 2 years. OAT and antiplatelet intake, age, dialytic age, comorbidities and percentage time in the target international normalized ratio (INR) range (target therapeutic range; TTR) were considered as predictors of hazard of death, thromboembolic and bleeding events. RESULTS: At recruitment, 134 patients out of 290 were taking OAT. During the follow-up, 115 patients died (4 strokes, 3 haemorrhagic and 1 thromboembolic). Antiplatelet therapy, but not OAT, was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.71, CI 1.10-2.64, P = 0.02). The estimated survival of patients always taking OAT tended to be higher than that of patients who stopped taking (68.6 versus 49.6%, P = 0.07). OAT was not correlated to a significant decreased risk of thromboembolic events (HR 0.12, CI 0.00-3.59, P = 0.20), while it was associated with an increased risk of bleeding (HR 3.96, CI 1.15-13.68, P = 0.03). Higher TTR was associated with a reduced bleeding risk (HR 0.09, CI 0.01-0.76, P = 0.03), while previous haemorrhagic events were associated with higher haemorrhagic risk (HR 2.17, CI 1.09-4.35, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In our population of HD patients with AF, the mortality is very high. OAT is not associated with increased mortality, while antiplatelet drugs are. OAT seems, on the contrary, associated with a better survival; however, it does not decrease the incidence of ischaemic stroke, whereas it increases the incidence of bleeding. Bleeding risk is lower in subjects in whom the INR is kept within the therapeutic range.

Increasing rate of atrial fibrillation from 2003 to 2011 in patients with ischaemic stroke: results from 55,551 patients in a nationwide registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The general awareness of atrial fibrillation is increasing. The key to prevent atrial fibrillation related stroke is oral anticoagulation therapy; however, it has often been proposed that oral anticoagulation therapy is under-utilized despite indication. The aim of the study was to examine the trends in atrial fibrillation rate in patients after acute ischaemic stroke and to determine whether the use of oral anticoagulation therapy increased from 2003 to 2011. METHODS: In the nationwide Danish Stroke Registry 55 551 patients (≥18 years) admitted with acute ischaemic stroke were identified. Frequency analysis and linear regression were used to assess trends in atrial fibrillation diagnosis and oral anticoagulation therapy prescription. RESULTS: A total of 17.1% (n = 9482) of ischaemic stroke patients had atrial fibrillation. The relative frequency of atrial fibrillation increased significantly during the study period (16.3%-20.1%). The prescription rate of oral anticoagulation therapy had a yearly increase five times higher than the atrial fibrillation rate. CONCLUSION: From 2003 to 2011 atrial fibrillation detection rate increased significantly, which was followed by a more marked increase in the use of oral anticoagulation therapy, most probably reflecting an increased awareness and questioning assumed current under-use of oral anticoagulation therapy in secondary stroke prevention.

Implementing evidence-based patient and family education on oral anticoagulation therapy: a community-based participatory project.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at developing and implementing evidence-based patient and family education on oral anticoagulation therapy. BACKGROUND: The number of persons with chronic diseases who live at home is increasing. They have to manage multiple diseases and complex treatments. One such treatment is oral anticoagulation therapy, a high risk variable dose medication. Adherence to oral anticoagulation therapy is jeopardised by limited information about the medications, their risk and complications, the impact of individual daily routine and the limited inclusion of family members in education. Hence, improved and tailored education is essential for patients and families to manage oral anticoagulation therapy at home. DESIGN AND METHODS: A community-based participatory research design combined with the Precede-Proceed model was used including a systematic literature review, posteducation analysis, an online nurse survey, a documentation analysis and patient/family interviews. The study was conducted between April 2010-December 2012 at a department of general internal medicine in a teaching hospital in Switzerland. Participants were the department's nursing and medical professionals including the patients and their families. RESULTS: The evidence-based patient and family education on oral anticoagulation therapy emerged comprising a learning assessment, teaching units, clarification of responsibilities of nurse professionals and documentation guidelines. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The inclusion of the whole department has contributed to the development and implementation of this evidence-based patient family education on oral anticoagulation therapy, which encompasses local characteristics and patient preferences. This education is now being used throughout the department.

Knowledge regarding oral anticoagulation therapy among patients with stroke and those at high risk of thromboembolic events.

BACKGROUND: Apart from atrial fibrillation, indications for oral anticoagulation common in our clinical practice include rheumatic heart disease and mechanical heart valve replacement. Evaluation of current patient knowledge regarding oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) is the first step in improving the quality of anticoagulation therapy and patient care. The aim of the present study was to assess the knowledge regarding OAT among patients with stroke and those at high risk of thromboembolic events in a tertiary care hospital in India. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used; 240 patients on OAT because of various indications (mechanical heart valve replacement, rheumatic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke) attending the neurology and cardiology outpatient clinics and inpatient services were recruited. A structured self-developed questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge in these patients. RESULTS: Most patients (62.9%) were ignorant about the target prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) levels with only 30% having their recent INR within the target range; 50% of the patients had a poor knowledge score, and the knowledge gap was most prominent in the domains of dietary interactions followed by drug interactions, adverse effects, and PT/INR monitoring. Knowledge score also had a significant association with gender, education, monthly income, and place of residence (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Patient's knowledge about OAT was suboptimal. The findings support the need for educational interventions to improve the knowledge regarding OAT and, thereby, achieve an appropriate and safe secondary prevention of stroke.

Incidence of cerebral thromboembolic events during long-term follow-up in patients treated with transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Net clinical benefit of long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) continuation after successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still controversial. To evaluate long-term thromboembolic (TE) and haemorrhagic events incidence according to OAT strategy used after AF transcatheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three months after AF ablation, OAT was discontinued in patients with CHADS2 ≤ 1 if no recurrences were documented, while OAT was maintained in patients with CHADS2 ≥ 2 regardless of AF recurrences. CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores have been retrospectively evaluated. Seven hundred and sixty-six patients were followed for a median of 60.5 months. Six (6/267 = 2.2%) and five (5/499 = 1%) TE events occurred in the ON and the OFF-OAT patients, respectively (P = 0.145), all in concomitance with the AF recurrence. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc ≥ 2 were associated with high TE incidence (P = 0.047 and P = 0.020). Among patients with a CHADS2 score of 0 or 1, a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 2 was predictive of TE events (P = 0.014). Overall, the incidence of the TE events in patients with CHA2DS2VASc ≥ 2 was 0.6 per 100 patient-years whereas seven haemorrhagic events occurred, all of them in the ON-OAT patients (7/267 = 2.6%). CONCLUSION: Patients with AF undergoing transcatheter ablation have a lower incidence of TE events as compared with the general AF population, regardless of OAT maintenance. The unpredictable risk of AF recurrence, mandate the routine use of the CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAS-BLED scores to guide clinical decision regarding OAT management in this peculiar setting of patients. The potential protective role of rhythm control strategy in the TE events needs to be confirmed by future large randomized trials.

Prognostic impact of oral anticoagulation therapy and atrial fibrillation in patients with type B acute aortic dissection.

Background: The prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in patients with type B acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic impact of AF and OAC therapy in patients with type B AAD. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with AAD were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients with type B AAD were selected from the study population and divided into three groups: AF(+)/OAC(+), AF(+)/OAC(-), and AF(-)/OAC(-). The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, progressive aortic events, cerebral infarction, and organ malperfusion. Results: In total, 139 patients diagnosed with type B AAD were analyzed. AF was observed in 27 patients (19%). Among them, 13 patients (9%) received OAC therapy for AF. MACCE occurred in 32 patients (23%) during the observation period: all-cause death in four patients, progressive aortic events in 24 patients, cerebral infarction events in two patients, and malperfusion events in two patients. The incidence of MACCE was higher in the AF(+)/OAC(+) group than in the AF(+)/OAC(-) group (hazard ratio[HR]: 3.875; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.153-17.496). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE between the AF(+)/OAC(-) and AF(-)/OAC(-) groups (HR: 1.001, 95% CI: 0.509-1.802). Conclusion: Among patients with type B AAD, the use of OAC for AF was associated with a higher risk of MACCE.

Assessment of patient-reported treatment burden in patients with coronary artery disease.

Introduction: Patient-reported treatment burden (TBN) refers to the patient's time and effort invested in the management of their chronic health conditions. The aim of this research was to explore TBN in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic medical condition(s) were invited to complete the study questionnaires (TBN and EQ-5D). Results: Of 514 enrolled patients, 116 (22.6%) patients had CAD. The mean TBN score for CAD vs. non-CAD was 40.49 ±21.54 and 46.17 ±21.44 (p = 0.023), respectively. Conclusions: Patients with CAD could have a lower TBN in comparison to patients with other chronic medical conditions.